Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 20.1209  2461180.6209  13.72  07:36:22.40 +29:30:20.9
190.00739  22.05354 galactic  Gem  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 1.3 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
146 Lucina                  -2     -0       2  14.1     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:36:22.40 +29:30:20.9:  16.06 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:36:22.40 +29:30:20.9:  16.08 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits


fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits


fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits  wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits -crosshair 7885.23877 3602.88550 image    wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits -crosshair 7883.98926 3603.00562 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 20.12093 07 36 22.40 +29 30 20.9          13.7 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 20.12073 07 36 22.31 +29 30 21.3          13.7 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 05 20.12113 07 36 22.50 +29 30 20.5          13.7 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 05 20.1209*  07 36 22.40 +29 30 20.9  13.7 U             Gem       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.6209,13.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.1209 13.72CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 20.1209  2461180.6209  14.43  08:31:17.70 +30:08:04.8
193.25551  33.62641 galactic  Cnc  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 0.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 08:31:17.70 +30:08:04.8 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:31:17.70 +30:08:04.8:  15.94 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:31:17.70 +30:08:04.8:  15.91 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits


fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits


fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits  wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits -crosshair 725.02612 2731.98193 image    wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits -crosshair 724.48468 2731.99390 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 20.12093 08 31 17.70 +30 08 04.8          14.4 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 20.12073 08 31 17.75 +30 08 05.0          14.4 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 05 20.12113 08 31 17.66 +30 08 04.5          14.4 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 05 20.1209*  08 31 17.70 +30 08 04.8  14.4 U             Cnc       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461180.6209,14.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260520.1209 14.43CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 20.1209  2461180.6209  14.28  08:10:47.26 +28:30:52.5
193.66643  28.88558 galactic  Cnc  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 0.9 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
432 Pythia                  -2     -1       3  14.4    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:10:47.26 +28:30:52.5:  16.15 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:10:47.26 +28:30:52.5:  16.11 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits


fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits


fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits  wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits -crosshair 3322.29712 3990.23608 image    wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits -crosshair 3321.43262 3990.24780 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 20.12093 08 10 47.26 +28 30 52.5          14.3 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 20.12073 08 10 47.24 +28 30 52.9          14.3 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 05 20.12113 08 10 47.29 +28 30 52.2          14.3 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 05 20.1209*  08 10 47.26 +28 30 52.5  14.3 U             Cnc       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461180.6209,14.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260520.1209 14.28CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 20.1209  2461180.6209  11.61  08:18:27.40 +31:08:44.9
191.27256  31.20852 galactic  Cnc  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 0.7 pix   
The object was found in VSX
 1"  NSVS J0818276+310848          
Type: L:
#   Max.           Min./Amp.       JD0           Period
    10.239   R1      Y     0.752   R1                             248.000000000000   M7?                          
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:18:27.40 +31:08:44.9:  12.55 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:18:27.40 +31:08:44.9:  12.55 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.55 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits


Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits


fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits


fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs   wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -crosshair 2428.38110 2431.97900 image    wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -crosshair 2427.64429 2434.92578 image    wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits -crosshair 2467.19238 2317.65381 image    wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits -crosshair 2466.46680 2317.54565 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 20.12093 08 18 27.40 +31 08 44.9          11.6 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 05 20.12073 08 18 27.39 +31 08 44.8          11.6 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 05 20.12113 08 18 27.40 +31 08 44.9          11.6 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 05 20.1209*  08 18 27.40 +31 08 44.9  11.6 U             Cnc       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0818276+310848,2461180.6209,11.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0818276+310848 20260520.1209 11.61CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
First image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Last  image: 2461180.62113198 20.05.2026 02:54:15.803   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  14008
Objects passed selection criteria:  13975
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.2    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.2    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 11545.8
Average stars matched: 11282.5 (97.7199 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   118884 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue May 19 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-63-g0e0f9022
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue May 19 22:00:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
First image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Last  image: 2461180.62113198 20.05.2026 02:54:15.803   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 109
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.29
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 22 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  78033
Objects passed selection criteria:  77832
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 61377
Average stars matched: 59415.5 (96.8042 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:  1924316 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue May 19 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-63-g0e0f9022
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-19)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue May 19 22:02:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Gem-02-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Gem-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Gem-02-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1256561 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1256561 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.png' -> 'transient_report/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits_preview.png'

Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits


renamed 'Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.png' -> 'transient_report/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits_preview.png'

Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 516.5709
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 634.3629
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2210.0330
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 703.8203
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2164.2642
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 697.9388
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.27828
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.008
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 17.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-19T21:53:41.4737850' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-20T02:53:41.4737850' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61180.1206189003 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-20T02:53:51.3740037' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61180.1207334953 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     119.997750093513 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     29.9998725735801 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     40.4755555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     282.631111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.53850153408541 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Gem-02'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29420 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29420 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  4.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 44.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                902.2 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 17.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                306.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            10.400832 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/d_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits :)

Spent 0.607308 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/d_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 17.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-19T21:54:15.8036175' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-20T02:54:15.8036175' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61180.1210162384 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-20T02:54:25.7046636' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61180.1211308334 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     119.997750091844 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     29.9998725756145 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     40.3602777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     282.688055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.54212464620331 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Gem-02'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29420 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29420 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     18.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  4.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 44.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                902.2 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 17.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                306.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            20.201616 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            10.400832 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/d_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits :)

Spent 0.591666 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/d_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 38180.487059
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24939.0, right_median=28319.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-12.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits



fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461180.62073464
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:05.127 +30:00:18.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:05.127 +30:00:18.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0281 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:04.786 +30:00:18.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:04.786 +30:00:18.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0286 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  08:00:05.127 +30:00:18.58
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:04.786 +30:00:18.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00123 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00123 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5yRFgr87nV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uocBgjRZjy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ogk3ooWavd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xgy5DtdEGE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat 
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3035 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3035 deg
Loaded 9467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7183 out of 7679 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7679 out of 14578 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.915000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.915000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.33

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.33

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3035 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3035 deg
Loaded 9467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7183 out of 7679 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7679 out of 14578 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 14611 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6189 to 129.5920 deg, Dec +24.4256 to +35.3044 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6189 to 129.5920 deg, Dec 24.4256 to 35.3044 deg
Loaded 9463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7187 out of 7676 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7676 out of 14611 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.4 pix  Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
 2.3 pix  Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
 4.1 pix  fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
 4.1 pix  fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
 2.4 pix  wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
 2.3 pix  wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.3 mag.  Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
 15.3 mag.  Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
 14.3 mag.  fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
 14.3 mag.  fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.3 (SNR )  11.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5yRFgr87nV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1032, passed=14578
Got 14578 stars (including 13536 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" 
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.698 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.551 n_q1=222 n_q2=286 n_q3=200 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.393
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uocBgjRZjy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1022, passed=14611
Got 14611 stars (including 13580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14611 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" 
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.675 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=225 n_q2=287 n_q3=197 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.324
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ogk3ooWavd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=365, passed=8612
Got 8612 stars (including 8244 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8612 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8574 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8574 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8574 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=221 n_q2=270 n_q3=225 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xgy5DtdEGE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=364, passed=8676
Got 8676 stars (including 8309 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8676 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8645 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.344 n_q1=224 n_q2=273 n_q3=221 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits sigma_overall=0.501 worst_q_ratio=1.393
ref2=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits sigma_overall=0.510 worst_q_ratio=1.324
new1=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.155
new2=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.151
reference average sigma_overall=0.5055 worst_q_ratio=1.3585
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20775_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 20775_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    11.96    08:29:47.77 +27:35:48.0   0728 4286   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  08:29:47.74 +27:35:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20906_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 20906_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    11.43    08:17:11.24 +24:47:45.7   2252 6161   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  08:17:11.25 +24:47:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20921_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 20921_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    11.55    08:10:23.19 +25:29:18.9   3222 5819   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  08:10:23.19 +25:29:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02413_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 02413_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    9.20    07:26:13.95 +33:22:17.1   9204 1247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  07:26:13.94 +33:22:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:05.127 +30:00:18.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:05.127 +30:00:18.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0281 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.1'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:04.786 +30:00:18.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:04.786 +30:00:18.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0286 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  08:00:05.127 +30:00:18.58
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:04.786 +30:00:18.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00123 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00123 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vf2uU1nfRL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1YPXXVHarD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P15qIi5eK8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits &> /tmp/tmp.im2uW1zzjb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat 
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 84052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3079 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3079 deg
Loaded 9496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6463 out of 7799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7799 out of 84052 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.787800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.787800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.50

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.50

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 84052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3079 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3079 deg
Loaded 9496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6463 out of 7799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7799 out of 84052 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 84140 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6089 to 129.6124 deg, Dec +24.4256 to +35.3113 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6089 to 129.6124 deg, Dec 24.4256 to 35.3113 deg
Loaded 9485 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6460 out of 7793 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7793 out of 84140 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 94 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
 2.1 pix  Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
 3.6 pix  fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
 3.6 pix  fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
 15.5 mag.  Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
 14.3 mag.  fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
 14.3 mag.  fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.3 (SNR )  13.7 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Vf2uU1nfRL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=41, blended=6475, passed=84011
Got 84011 stars (including 77428 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84011 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" 
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.517 n_q1=233 n_q2=286 n_q3=193 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.269
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1YPXXVHarD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=41, blended=6514, passed=84099
Got 84099 stars (including 77496 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84099 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83130 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" 
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.488 n_q1=230 n_q2=290 n_q3=191 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.P15qIi5eK8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1578, passed=39302
Got 39302 stars (including 37701 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39302 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39102 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39102 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39102 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=225 n_q2=266 n_q3=227 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.208
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.im2uW1zzjb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1783, passed=40054
Got 40054 stars (including 38241 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40054 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39842 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=224 n_q2=265 n_q3=227 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:33:18.05 +32:32:23.4:  13.47 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:24:08.80 +34:06:44.3:  13.34 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:56:13.07 +29:49:18.6:  12.78 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:24:08.80 +34:06:44.3:  13.29 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:33:18.05 +32:32:23.4:  13.42 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:08.80 +34:06:44.3: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0838 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:18.05 +32:32:23.4: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2554 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:28:40.86 +28:18:40.8:  12.96 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:56:13.07 +29:49:18.6:  12.70 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:56:13.07 +29:49:18.6: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5920 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:23:35.80 +25:05:38.6:  13.10 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:20:25.94 +26:46:30.3:  13.06 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:28:40.86 +28:18:40.8:  12.95 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:28:40.86 +28:18:40.8: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0805 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:29:36.10 +25:32:12.0:  13.37 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:29:50.36 +27:00:51.1:  13.40 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:23:35.80 +25:05:38.6:  13.08 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:23:35.80 +25:05:38.6: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0751 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:20:25.94 +26:46:30.3:  12.99 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:20:25.94 +26:46:30.3: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0807 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:29:36.10 +25:32:12.0:  13.35 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:29:36.10 +25:32:12.0: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4368 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:29:50.36 +27:00:51.1:  13.44 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:29:50.36 +27:00:51.1: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3554 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:36:22.40 +29:30:20.9:  16.06 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:19:26.73 +30:13:17.1:  13.90 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:36:22.40 +29:30:20.9:  16.08 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:10:47.26 +28:30:52.5:  16.15 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:31:17.70 +30:08:04.8:  15.94 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:19:26.73 +30:13:17.1:  13.77 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:19:26.73 +30:13:17.1: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9230 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:10:47.26 +28:30:52.5:  16.11 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:31:17.70 +30:08:04.8:  15.91 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 08:18:27.40 +31:08:44.9:  12.55 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 08:18:27.40 +31:08:44.9:  12.55 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:18:27.40 +31:08:44.9: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6047 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101503.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101579.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101582.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out29915.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100534_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 100534_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 20.12073    2461180.62073    13.35    07:33:18.01 +32:32:21.6   8297 1766   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.22    07:33:18.09 +32:32:25.2   8296 1766   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100539_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 100539_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 20.12073    2461180.62073    13.10    07:24:08.76 +34:06:44.7   9466 0787   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.07    07:24:08.84 +34:06:44.0   9465 0787   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100541_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 100541_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.10    07:29:13.67 +34:16:35.5   8816 0702   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  07:29:13.63 +34:16:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100544_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 100544_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    12.01    08:29:47.78 +27:35:48.0   0727 4286   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  08:29:47.74 +27:35:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100616_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 100616_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    10.34    07:24:39.69 +27:22:56.4   9470 4893   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  07:24:39.68 +27:22:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100670_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 100670_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    11.05    07:34:52.06 +31:52:34.4   8092 2169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  07:34:52.07 +31:52:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100704_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 100704_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    11.47    08:04:50.96 +32:11:39.4   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100787_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 100787_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    12.06    07:55:00.12 +26:22:04.9   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100792_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 100792_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    12.04    07:43:57.76 +25:46:41.3   6828 5841   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  07:43:57.74 +25:46:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100860_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 100860_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    12.35    07:27:00.25 +26:26:14.0   9157 5472   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  07:27:00.25 +26:26:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100918_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 100918_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    12.61    08:14:34.94 +26:43:06.2   2719 5028   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  08:14:34.94 +26:43:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100925_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 100925_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 20.12073    2461180.62073    12.52    07:56:13.05 +29:49:18.5   5286 3333   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    12.70    07:56:13.09 +29:49:18.6   5285 3333   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100938_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 100938_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    12.69    08:35:49.54 +34:19:13.4   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100949_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 100949_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    12.45    07:43:37.21 +32:27:29.8   6971 1804   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  07:43:37.18 +32:27:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100975_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 100975_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    12.44    07:28:14.21 +33:29:29.6   8945 1179   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  07:28:14.14 +33:29:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100988_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 100988_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    12.61    07:26:25.33 +25:56:22.5   9243 5777   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  07:26:25.39 +25:56:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100996_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 100996_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    12.66    07:24:51.18 +26:41:38.3   9452 5314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  07:24:51.15 +26:41:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100997_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 100997_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    12.59    07:34:48.38 +31:51:50.8   8099 2176   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  07:34:48.37 +31:51:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100999_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 100999_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    12.64    07:56:56.07 +31:10:02.2   5235 2520   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  07:56:56.10 +31:10:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101022_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101022_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.03    08:08:36.96 +25:14:21.8   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101026_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101026_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 20.12073    2461180.62073    13.02    08:28:40.81 +28:18:40.9   0933 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.16    08:28:40.90 +28:18:40.6   0932 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101027_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101027_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.03    08:20:11.93 +31:29:34.6   2263 2085   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  08:20:11.96 +31:29:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101039_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101039_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    12.65    07:31:04.86 +32:36:02.8   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101043_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101043_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    12.81    08:00:01.86 +30:42:53.7   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101045_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101045_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    12.79    07:31:00.34 +34:23:55.2   8590 0631   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  07:31:00.38 +34:23:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101048_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101048_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 20.12073    2461180.62073    13.10    08:23:35.84 +25:05:38.3   1390 5895   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.06    08:23:35.76 +25:05:38.8   1389 5895   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101059_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101059_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    12.90    07:27:52.37 +27:05:13.9   9032 5076   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101070_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101070_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.13    08:16:55.85 +30:20:13.4   2616 2823   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  08:16:55.83 +30:20:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101075_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101075_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 20.12073    2461180.62073    13.10    08:20:25.92 +26:46:30.8   1934 4920   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.07    08:20:25.97 +26:46:29.8   1934 4921   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101076_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101076_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    12.78    07:42:50.73 +34:00:37.6   7093 0866   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  07:42:50.68 +34:00:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101079_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101079_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.14    08:29:10.53 +29:28:10.5   0953 3168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  08:29:10.55 +29:28:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101084_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101084_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    12.88    07:26:24.84 +32:21:11.7   9188 1869   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  07:26:24.88 +32:21:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101104_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101104_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.11    08:24:58.58 +28:34:19.8   1445 3773   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  08:24:58.56 +28:34:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101137_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101137_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.25    08:00:22.43 +25:02:54.3   4568 6181   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  08:00:22.52 +25:02:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101141_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101141_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 20.12073    2461180.62073    13.37    08:29:36.21 +25:32:13.0   0595 5537   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.53    08:29:35.99 +25:32:11.0   0595 5537   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101142_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101142_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 20.12073    2461180.62073    13.36    08:29:50.37 +27:00:51.3   0677 4638   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.35    08:29:50.34 +27:00:50.8   0677 4638   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101167_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101167_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.44    08:32:48.15 +26:43:37.3   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101169_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101169_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.53    08:29:25.35 +31:21:38.7   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101173_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101173_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.26    08:19:59.67 +27:14:37.8   2023 4643   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  08:19:59.63 +27:14:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101185_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101185_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.17    07:46:57.03 +26:00:40.0   6424 5686   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  07:46:56.92 +26:00:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101186_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101186_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.28    08:24:56.06 +31:23:22.3   1646 2079   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101190_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101190_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.27    08:06:37.00 +26:56:10.6   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101204_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101204_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    12.99    07:34:08.88 +33:01:04.5   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101222_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101222_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.39    08:29:53.20 +30:32:50.7   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101234_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101234_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.22    07:35:34.77 +27:12:40.4   7981 4995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  07:35:34.69 +27:12:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101241_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101241_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.42    08:33:06.86 +28:01:50.3   0314 3969   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  08:33:06.84 +28:01:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101247_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101247_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.37    08:11:45.57 +25:43:15.0   3047 5664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  08:11:45.58 +25:43:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101255_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101255_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.59    08:31:33.32 +30:37:32.9   0729 2432   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  08:31:33.29 +30:37:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101263_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101263_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.55    08:35:47.15 +30:06:02.2   0129 2673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101265_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101265_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.44    08:19:55.47 +26:51:55.8   2008 4873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  08:19:55.41 +26:51:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101272_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101272_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.68    08:32:00.90 +28:16:39.0   0482 3839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101286_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101286_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.58    08:33:04.12 +28:23:00.9   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101311_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101311_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.59    08:03:06.93 +27:56:46.3   4311 4407   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  08:03:06.89 +27:56:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101332_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101332_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.42    08:31:35.28 +25:19:24.1   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101341_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101341_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.56    08:30:22.58 +27:46:45.9   0663 4167   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  08:30:22.57 +27:46:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101342_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101342_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.64    08:33:51.80 +27:31:17.8   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101353_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101353_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.74    08:35:09.66 +30:58:12.2   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101369_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101369_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.75    08:10:57.62 +25:47:03.8   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101371_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101371_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.33    07:53:12.12 +27:54:07.8   5627 4508   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  07:53:12.11 +27:54:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101372_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101372_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.51    08:31:47.10 +32:59:50.9   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101381_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101381_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.68    08:31:27.00 +34:19:06.4   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101388_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101388_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.48    08:03:55.13 +28:01:03.3   4208 4357   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  08:03:55.10 +28:01:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101420_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101420_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.65    08:05:30.65 +32:29:47.6   4191 1651   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  08:05:30.61 +32:29:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101425_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101425_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.76    08:13:01.68 +25:18:08.2   2852 5903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  08:13:01.65 +25:18:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101426_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101426_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.73    08:20:47.75 +26:57:37.0   1896 4804   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  08:20:47.72 +26:57:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101452_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101452_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.57    07:27:10.17 +28:10:36.4   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101453_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101453_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.83    08:28:24.13 +25:43:25.7   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101461_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101461_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.87    08:30:43.22 +29:15:20.7   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101464_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101464_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.79    08:25:16.21 +33:07:41.8   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101479_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101479_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.85    08:32:25.34 +27:12:29.7   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101493_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101493_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.99    08:26:09.07 +30:08:12.3   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101503_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 101503_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101518_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101518_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.77    08:05:40.66 +27:30:27.0   3952 4648   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  08:05:40.65 +27:30:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101520_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101520_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.85    07:39:54.45 +32:53:46.4   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101521_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101521_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    14.23    08:34:40.27 +29:05:46.1   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101524_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101524_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.80    07:59:33.67 +32:49:23.2   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101532_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101532_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 05 20.12073    2461180.62073    14.05    08:19:26.72 +30:13:17.1   2282 2860   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-53-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.84    08:19:26.74 +30:13:17.2   2282 2860   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101536_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101536_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    14.03    08:25:27.45 +29:37:26.4   1455 3133   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101544_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101544_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.94    08:02:29.35 +35:01:26.1   4674 0150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101548_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101548_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.79    08:36:36.77 +32:05:34.3   0189 1455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101562_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101562_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    14.04    08:28:53.16 +30:59:25.3   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101566_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101566_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    14.24    08:21:22.32 +30:02:33.0   2019 2941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101570_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101570_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    14.56    08:31:31.86 +32:29:23.8   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101571_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101571_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    14.06    08:09:26.31 +33:15:19.1   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101572_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101572_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    14.31    07:54:28.50 +32:39:15.0   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101578_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101578_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    14.46    08:17:36.37 +25:25:23.7   2233 5775   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101579_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 101579_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101581_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 101581_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    14.24    08:13:28.13 +25:52:24.5   2823 5552   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101582_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 101582_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56633_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 56633_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    12.47    07:32:32.78 +26:47:15.5   8394 5257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  07:32:32.78 +26:47:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34685_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 34685_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    12.29    07:45:27.52 +30:46:40.7   6708 2813   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  07:45:27.53 +30:46:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25529_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 25529_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    13.20    08:34:56.58 +31:26:50.8   0352 1876   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11699_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 11699_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 05 20.12113    2461180.62113    9.23    07:26:13.97 +33:22:17.0   9204 1247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_215801_TTUQ1b1x1_2462878_TRgVtnvj/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits

**** FOUND  07:26:13.96 +33:22:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29915_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 29915_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_21-54-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 24s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:36:22.40 +29:30:20.9
08:31:17.70 +30:08:04.8
08:10:47.26 +28:30:52.5
08:18:27.40 +31:08:44.9
########### Completed Gem-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
07:36:22.40 +29:30:20.9
08:31:17.70 +30:08:04.8
08:10:47.26 +28:30:52.5
08:18:27.40 +31:08:44.9
###################################################################################
07:36:22.40 +29:30:20.9  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
08:31:17.70 +30:08:04.8  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:10:47.26 +28:30:52.5  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
08:18:27.40 +31:08:44.9  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
08:18:27.40 +31:08:44.9  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:31:17.70 +30:08:04.8  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
08:18:27.40 +31:08:44.9  -- a known variable star
08:31:17.70 +30:08:04.8  -- not a known variable star
Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
2 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO   ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
08:18:27.40 +31:08:44.9
08:31:17.70 +30:08:04.8
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461180.62073464 -observatory V36
04:13:20.66 +22:15:59.4 Mercury (-1.7mag)
06:04:01.84 +25:03:52.2 Venus (-3.9mag)
01:54:41.33 +10:57:46.0 Mars (1.3mag)
07:33:24.41 +22:06:34.5 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:43:10.21 +02:13:35.6 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:55:35.60 +20:11:55.6 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:14:42.30 +00:08:27.5 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:34:06.49 -22:58:16.2 Pluto (14.5mag)
07:04:21.40 +25:59:28.2 Moon (-9.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 May 19 22:00 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461180.62073464:
07:33:32.28 +22:06:14.5 Io (5.9mag)
07:33:17.09 +22:06:52.6 Europa (6.1mag)
07:33:33.84 +22:06:15.3 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:33:56.82 +22:05:10.3 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:34:51.85 +21:43:34.6 Himalia (15.5mag)
07:33:24.84 +22:06:35.0 Thebe (16.4mag)
07:35:16.06 +22:07:22.2 Elara (17.5mag)
07:34:30.67 +22:28:35.1 Pasiphae (17.6mag)
07:40:44.99 +22:07:01.9 Carme (18.7mag)
00:43:03.03 +02:14:02.4 Titan (8.7mag)
00:43:13.46 +02:13:46.6 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:43:19.68 +02:12:38.7 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:43:15.37 +02:13:10.9 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:44:14.63 +02:18:12.3 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 19 22:00 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461180.62073464:
17:11:25.13 -31:52:47.7 JWST
20:27:20.97 -10:50:15.6 Chandra
08:02:23.20 -40:02:59.2 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 19 22:00 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461180.62073464 -observatory V36
13:26:30.63 -27:40:26.6 14.5mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard)
06:26:53.80 +30:48:40.8 15.8mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks)
15:31:53.77 +01:02:41.3 14.7mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift)
05:18:27.54 +24:24:49.9 17.1mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr)
08:47:33.34 +19:48:04.9 17.8mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina)
18:53:25.11 -31:10:43.6 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:35:12.08 -68:24:22.8 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:42:15.05 +31:44:25.5 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:22:06.32 +14:04:38.6 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:14:49.38 +30:46:11.7 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:10:31.20 +26:46:33.8 16.3mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:17:19.03 +31:39:09.0 16.5mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:41:18.43 +02:49:27.7 17.6mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:39:50.85 +20:55:30.6 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:27:00.60 -11:04:50.9 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
08:59:41.34 -07:18:04.6 18.0mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
22:15:25.24 +65:13:46.8 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:29:59.78 -05:05:28.7 13.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
14:11:12.43 +86:57:06.5 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:46:17.72 +63:47:26.1 17.5mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:16:56.31 +25:42:15.2 12.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:52:57.91 +11:28:50.7 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:21:45.05 +25:18:14.6 14.2mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:58:56.42 -17:51:40.4 16.1mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:47:54.99 +37:56:50.1 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:54:21.57 +53:25:38.3 16.7mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:10:39.72 -09:37:49.7 11.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:42:08.29 +04:30:08.5 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
01:23:50.01 +41:49:13.2 15.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:11:24.82 -11:54:34.6 16.2mag A/2026 E1
19:48:20.00 -08:10:10.7 9.8mag 10P/Tempel
14:22:04.71 -01:35:48.5 17.1mag 24P/Schaumasse
10:59:11.17 -00:52:22.5 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:47:32.77 -02:35:23.5 17.6mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
02:41:58.31 +22:56:56.3 17.5mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:19:24.06 +28:57:53.1 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:08:44.63 -07:50:24.2 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
05:42:34.39 +30:35:01.4 16.4mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:23:36.46 +14:26:18.3 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels
00:36:28.66 +00:17:02.2 15.2mag 88P/Howell
03:53:26.79 +28:03:48.7 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
06:06:08.62 +33:20:22.2 15.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:17:55.58 +22:55:54.1 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos
03:27:40.40 +17:47:00.5 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
03:55:25.55 +17:54:49.6 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
04:28:35.11 +19:40:30.1 12.3mag 141P/Machholz
04:31:42.03 +15:20:18.2 12.2mag 141P-A/Machholz
03:14:12.55 +12:09:08.1 10.5mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:43:38.13 -27:39:44.9 17.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
02:41:12.89 +15:25:48.1 14.8mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:32:16.10 -03:05:28.4 17.8mag 169P/NEAT
17:06:49.65 -09:55:08.0 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR
06:51:09.43 +35:55:11.5 17.3mag 240P/NEAT
23:43:00.34 -10:04:39.3 16.9mag 260P/McNaught
03:14:49.54 +28:37:06.3 17.7mag 295P/LINEAR
21:01:25.80 -34:05:39.6 17.9mag 320P/McNaught
15:25:05.34 +08:21:18.3 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
07:52:56.04 +21:08:39.2 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
06:28:55.54 +42:58:52.6 17.7mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K May 19 22:00 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.12 16.24
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10    2026-05-13.41 16.8
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10    2026-05-13.41 16.8
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00  SN2026fwt  2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20  ASASSN-26ce  2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50  AT2026hiy  2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80  ASASSN-26cg  2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20  SN2026fzb  2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30  ASASSN-26cd  2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70  AT2026gzl  2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50  ASASSN-26cf  2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60  SN 2026evz  2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50  ASASSN-26bx  2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10  ASASSN-26bw  2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80  ASASSN-26ca  2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20  SN 2026fvx  2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60  ASASSN-26bz  2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80  ASASSN-26cc  2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20  SN 2026fmh  2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50  ASASSN-26cb  2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50  ASASSN-26by  2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60  SN2026fjc  2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20  ASASSN-26bv  2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40  ASASSN-26bt  2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10  ASASSN-26bu  2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00  SN 2026eza  2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90  AT2026fsf  2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30  SN 2026enn  2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00  AT 2026ezy  2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30  ASASSN-26bs  2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20  ASASSN-26br  2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40  AT 2023uk  2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10  AT2026fhw  2026-03-14.06 SDSS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 19 22:00 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3  TCP J17432974+1124003  2026-02-22.3773  13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7  PNV J09550159+6908427  2026-02-20.893  19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1  TCP J07032576-1241401  2026-03-10.4268  15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8  PNV J00423682+4116058  2026-03-12.5744  17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1  TCP J07264579-2745141  2026-03-17.4417  14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7  TCP J17571956-2808147  2026-03-19.7972  14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7  TCP J08460573+1047397  2026-03-21.1936  14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7  PNV J09553883+6905217  2026-04-01.893  19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7  TCP J19324367-2239307  2026-04-05.4395  13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9  TCP J16163603+4452289  2026-04-05.6655  14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8  PNV J09550289+6902138  2026-05-18.925  20.7mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 19 22:00 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
07:10:35.982 -68:41:17.89  AT 2026mli  2026-05-12.97 19.219
17:52:46.431 +47:52:46.86  AT 2026mlh  2026-05-08.38 20.1882
14:13:17.140 -79:34:21.34  SN 2026mlg  2026-05-13.16 19.098
13:01:56.482 -31:45:10.71  SN 2026mlf  2026-05-12.13 19.007
07:54:45.643 -77:42:34.01  AT 2026mle  2026-05-13.07 19.016
20:30:20.180 -54:23:56.77  AT 2026mld  2026-05-13.27 18.409
22:04:13.307 -62:36:12.13  AT 2026mlc  2026-05-13.37 18.826
05:26:12.032 -40:06:08.32  AT 2026mlb  2026-05-13.00 18.67
19:42:54.081 +00:48:22.14  AT 2026mla  2026-05-13.45 19.82
19:30:52.401 +01:28:25.46  AT 2026mkz  2026-05-10.43 18.98
19:16:53.816 +07:01:58.07  AT 2026mky  2026-05-13.38 19.79
18:26:55.952 +08:19:11.34  AT 2026mkx  2026-05-09.34 18.11
18:46:00.564 +05:06:38.95  AT 2026mkw  2026-05-08.40 19.71
14:09:28.410 +14:24:05.48  AT 2026mkv  2026-05-13.26 20.45
10:19:49.459 +35:57:58.03  AT 2026mku  2026-05-08.16 20.5914
08:06:09.530 +34:06:49.84  AT 2026mkt  2026-05-09.16 19.864
10:53:32.277 +43:02:13.19  AT 2026mks  2026-05-08.20 19.7954
18:01:16.824 +61:44:43.86  AT 2026mkr  2026-05-11.93 20.08
18:17:49.524 +02:21:23.22  AT 2026mkq  2026-05-09.38 19.93
18:01:57.479 +12:50:56.84  AT 2026mkp  2026-05-12.38 20.49
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 19 22:00 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Tue May 19 21:59:55 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 3 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 6s (0.10 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 25s (0.42 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 41s (0.68 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 1s (0.02 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 74s (1.23 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 11 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 4 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 4 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 58s (0.97 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 103s (1.72 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 24s (0.40 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 190s (3.17 min)
FIELD_Gem-02-Q1b1x1: 277s (4.62 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 280s (4.67 min)
Finished: Tue May 19 22:04:35 CDT 2026