This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3847 2461179.8847 12.44 18:40:00.73 -33:27:48.4
1.47623 -12.38221 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V2377 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.900 V < 15.200 V 2453590.00000 211.500000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:40:00.73 -33:27:48.4: 13.70 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:40:00.73 -33:27:48.4: 13.32 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2377 Sgr,2461179.8847,12.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2377 Sgr 20260519.3847 12.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3847 2461179.8847 11.80 18:37:26.49 -35:17:12.5
359.55113 -12.65438 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V0944 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.700 V < 15.100 V 2453139.00000 206.500000000000 Me
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:37:26.49 -35:17:12.5: 12.84 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:37:26.49 -35:17:12.5: 12.81 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0944 Sgr,2461179.8847,11.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0944 Sgr 20260519.3847 11.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3847 2461179.8847 11.44 18:18:50.51 -31:40:33.7
1.13097 -7.58998 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.5" and 9.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" V1847 Sgr
Type: SRA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.400 pg 16.300 pg 2435632.00000 117.200000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:18:50.51 -31:40:33.7: 12.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:18:50.51 -31:40:33.7: 12.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1847 Sgr,2461179.8847,11.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1847 Sgr 20260519.3847 11.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3847 2461179.8847 12.20 18:49:52.83 -31:33:52.5
4.12651 -13.50533 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V0963 Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.700 V < 15.600 V 2453604.00000 262.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:49:52.83 -31:33:52.5: 13.29 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:49:52.83 -31:33:52.5: 13.25 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0963 Sgr,2461179.8847,12.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0963 Sgr 20260519.3847 12.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3847 2461179.8847 11.66 18:26:03.72 -30:10:47.5
3.18607 -8.29207 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" Gaia DR2 4047932670010782080
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.500 V < 16.000 V 2457570.00000 239.900000000000 M5
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:26:03.72 -30:10:47.5: 12.62 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:26:03.72 -30:10:47.5: 12.62 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR2 4047932670010782080,2461179.8847,11.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR2 4047932670010782080 20260519.3847 11.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461149.94101943 19.04.2026 10:34:54.079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
First image: 2461149.94101943 19.04.2026 10:34:54.079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Last image: 2461179.88497250 19.05.2026 09:14:11.624 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.81
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8146
Objects passed selection criteria: 8124
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6345
Average stars matched: 6199 (97.699 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114336 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 05:04:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461149.94101943 19.04.2026 10:34:54.079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
First image: 2461149.94101943 19.04.2026 10:34:54.079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Last image: 2461179.88497250 19.05.2026 09:14:11.624 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 109
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 83047
Objects passed selection criteria: 82955
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 70627
Average stars matched: 68003.5 (96.2854 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1937880 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 05:06:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461179.88435022
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits'
wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Image size: 937.5'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.3'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:58.796 -33:59:40.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15
Second-epoch image center 18:46:58.796 -33:59:40.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0067 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Image size: 937.3'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:57.443 -33:58:50.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15
Second-epoch image center 18:46:57.443 -33:58:50.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0202 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:46:58.796 -33:59:40.90
Second-epoch second image center 18:46:57.443 -33:58:50.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01468 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hWN4SvR2eo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CkcH83AMrU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.taQABcR9og
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4O6JXILGNM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9806 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.4475 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.4475 deg
Loaded 18922 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7477 out of 7738 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7738 out of 9806 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.538200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.538200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.81
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.73
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.73
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9806 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.4475 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.4475 deg
Loaded 18922 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7477 out of 7738 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7738 out of 9806 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits (aperture=6.9)
Read 9797 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7996 to 291.8344 deg, Dec -39.2892 to -28.4753 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7996 to 291.8344 deg, Dec -39.2892 to -28.4753 deg
Loaded 18884 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7523 out of 7775 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7775 out of 9797 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits (aperture=6.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.9 pix Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
2.9 pix Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
2.9 pix wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
2.9 pix wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.7 mag. Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
13.7 mag. Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.8 (SNR ) 10.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.hWN4SvR2eo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=719, passed=9805
Got 9805 stars (including 9075 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9805 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9447 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.98"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9442 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.13"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.121 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.945 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.056 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.497 n_q1=269 n_q2=146 n_q3=285 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.336
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CkcH83AMrU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=699, passed=9797
Got 9797 stars (including 9089 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9797 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.94"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.95"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9445 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.09"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.034 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.899 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.177 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.045 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.597 n_q1=264 n_q2=147 n_q3=291 n_q4=211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.545
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.taQABcR9og (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=198, passed=4798
Got 4798 stars (including 4594 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4798 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4620 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4620 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Excluding outliers - 908 stars left (next iteration limit 1001)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits N_match=908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.837 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.833 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.876 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.779 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.921 n_q1=203 n_q2=136 n_q3=327 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4O6JXILGNM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=197, passed=4843
Got 4843 stars (including 4641 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4843 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.2 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.2 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4696 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4696 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits N_match=911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.899 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.818 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.963 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.854 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.979 n_q1=197 n_q2=169 n_q3=313 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits sigma_overall=1.121 worst_q_ratio=1.336
ref2=Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits sigma_overall=1.034 worst_q_ratio=1.545
new1=fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits sigma_overall=0.837 worst_q_ratio=1.100
new2=fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits sigma_overall=0.899 worst_q_ratio=1.089
reference average sigma_overall=1.0775 worst_q_ratio=1.4405
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742_astrometric_residuals.png (916 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743_astrometric_residuals.png (913 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173_astrometric_residuals.png (908 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174_astrometric_residuals.png (911 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20556_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 20556_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:15.21 -37:02:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Image size: 937.5'x625.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Image size: 937.3'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:58.796 -33:59:40.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15
Second-epoch image center 18:46:58.796 -33:59:40.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0067 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Image size: 937.3'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:46:57.443 -33:58:50.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:46:58.040 -34:00:03.15
Second-epoch image center 18:46:57.443 -33:58:50.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0202 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:46:58.796 -33:59:40.90
Second-epoch second image center 18:46:57.443 -33:58:50.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01468 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F5YRuPoM1h
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits &> /tmp/tmp.H1hdgyb0Es
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1RpR33WIhv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aBz9I9pFkd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits and wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 99884 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.3528 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.3528 deg
Loaded 19095 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13575 out of 15526 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15526 out of 99884 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.220000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.220000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.76
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.76
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 99884 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.3528 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7980 to 291.8349 deg, Dec -39.2842 to -28.3528 deg
Loaded 19095 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13575 out of 15526 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15526 out of 99884 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 98625 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 271.7996 to 291.8344 deg, Dec -39.2968 to -28.3682 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 271.7996 to 291.8344 deg, Dec -39.2968 to -28.3682 deg
Loaded 19082 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13689 out of 15539 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15539 out of 98625 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 72 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
2.6 pix Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
2.6 pix wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
2.6 pix wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.8 mag. Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
13.7 mag. Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 12.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.F5YRuPoM1h (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=8993, passed=99876
Got 99876 stars (including 90761 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99876 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 97064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.90"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 97063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.90"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 96945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.02"
Excluding outliers - 921 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits N_match=921 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.077 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.918 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.261 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.177 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.424 n_q1=270 n_q2=134 n_q3=311 n_q4=206 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.322
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.H1hdgyb0Es (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=8693, passed=98618
Got 98618 stars (including 89803 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.93"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.00"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits N_match=919 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.054 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.987 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.201 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.149 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.428 n_q1=268 n_q2=142 n_q3=308 n_q4=201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.355
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits -region wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1RpR33WIhv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=2293, passed=55381
Got 55381 stars (including 52995 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55381 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54211 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54211 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54192 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits N_match=911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.831 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.885 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.866 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.762 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.866 n_q1=202 n_q2=133 n_q3=332 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.066
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aBz9I9pFkd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2264, passed=56018
Got 56018 stars (including 53686 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56018 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.2 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55229 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.2 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55232 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits N_match=917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.885 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.799 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.952 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.833 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.985 n_q1=196 n_q2=167 n_q3=314 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-13-17_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_045936_TTUQ2b1x1_2789141_k4v7J2Cg/wcs_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:44:26.64 -31:52:46.3: 12.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:37:53.81 -35:18:21.8: 11.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:24:58.10 -30:10:46.1: 12.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:22:40.52 -30:58:09.3: 12.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:33:09.62 -32:15:29.7: 11.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:40:17.58 -32:33:29.4: 11.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:31:24.42 -32:08:22.0: 11.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:44:26.64 -31:52:46.3: 12.64 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:44:26.64 -31:52:46.3: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5334 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:17:19.75 -31:13:58.1: 11.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:24:58.10 -30:10:46.1: 12.33 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:24:58.10 -30:10:46.1: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.3105 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:20:53.17 -35:22:59.2: 11.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:37:53.81 -35:18:21.8: 11.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:22:40.52 -30:58:09.3: 12.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:33:09.62 -32:15:29.7: 11.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:37:53.81 -35:18:21.8: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9117 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:22:40.52 -30:58:09.3: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.3158 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:33:09.62 -32:15:29.7: ref_mag=11.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2760 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:31:24.42 -32:08:22.0: 11.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:40:17.58 -32:33:29.4: 11.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:31:24.42 -32:08:22.0: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0827 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:40:17.58 -32:33:29.4: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9351 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:17:19.75 -31:13:58.1: 11.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:20:53.17 -35:22:59.2: 11.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:17:19.75 -31:13:58.1: ref_mag=11.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.8314 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:20:53.17 -35:22:59.2: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.8785 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:35:37.76 -29:56:57.9: 12.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:35:37.76 -29:56:57.9: 12.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:26:39.14 -30:44:29.5: 11.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:35:37.76 -29:56:57.9: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.1170 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:42:30.65 -33:29:13.3: 11.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:26:39.14 -30:44:29.5: 11.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:26:39.14 -30:44:29.5: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.8628 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:20:47.68 -29:59:57.3: 11.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:42:30.65 -33:29:13.3: 11.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:30.65 -33:29:13.3: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.8347 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:48:54.03 -30:59:29.0: 11.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:20:47.68 -29:59:57.3: 11.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:20:47.68 -29:59:57.3: ref_mag=11.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4987 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:48:54.03 -30:59:29.0: 11.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:54.03 -30:59:29.0: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9561 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:14:19.15 -36:08:42.2: 11.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:14:19.15 -36:08:42.2: 11.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:14:19.15 -36:08:42.2: ref_mag=11.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2651 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:15:46.84 -32:50:46.9: 11.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:37:10.76 -36:04:06.1: 11.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:15:46.84 -32:50:46.9: 11.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:15:46.84 -32:50:46.9: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8170 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:37:10.76 -36:04:06.1: 12.01 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:37:10.76 -36:04:06.1: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0062 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:40:00.73 -33:27:48.4: 13.70 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:50:08.57 -33:36:41.2: 12.60 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:39:00.41 -31:08:55.4: 13.21 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:44:31.55 -31:29:39.1: 13.57 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:43:37.27 -31:24:47.5: 13.97 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:50:08.57 -33:36:41.2: 12.65 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:40:00.73 -33:27:48.4: 13.32 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:08.57 -33:36:41.2: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.5800 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:40:00.73 -33:27:48.4: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.4347 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:39:00.41 -31:08:55.4: 13.27 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:39:00.41 -31:08:55.4: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.8584 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:44:31.55 -31:29:39.1: 13.43 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:44:31.55 -31:29:39.1: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2657 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:43:37.27 -31:24:47.5: 14.08 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:43:37.27 -31:24:47.5: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.0067 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:18:50.51 -31:40:33.7: 12.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:37:26.49 -35:17:12.5: 12.84 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:49:52.83 -31:33:52.5: 13.29 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:18:50.51 -31:40:33.7: 12.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:37:26.49 -35:17:12.5: 12.81 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:18:50.51 -31:40:33.7: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=11.4145 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:37:26.49 -35:17:12.5: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=11.7858 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:49:52.83 -31:33:52.5: 13.25 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:49:52.83 -31:33:52.5: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.1923 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-34-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0742.fits at 18:26:03.72 -30:10:47.5: 12.62 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-35-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0743.fits at 18:26:03.72 -30:10:47.5: 12.62 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:26:03.72 -30:10:47.5: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=11.6604 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out119957.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out119840.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23807.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77394.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88630.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out96568.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119276_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119276_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119277_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119277_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:35.44 -37:18:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119293_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119293_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119303_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119303_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:29.92 -32:37:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119305_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119305_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:36.13 -30:44:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119306_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119306_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119308_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119308_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119318_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119318_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:27.38 -32:19:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119321_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119321_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:49.95 -30:42:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119324_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119324_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119325_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119325_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119327_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119327_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119328_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119328_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119329_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119329_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:49.43 -31:54:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119330_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119330_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119331_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119331_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119333_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119333_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119334_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119334_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119344_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119344_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:17.63 -30:24:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119346_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119346_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119349_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119349_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:34.63 -35:20:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119355_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119355_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119359_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119359_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:26.33 -35:00:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119360_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119360_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:07.22 -32:52:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119362_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119362_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:41.92 -35:33:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119430_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119430_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:20.90 -36:58:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119444_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119444_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:46.82 -37:35:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119461_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119461_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:53.65 -34:34:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119484_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119484_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:20.54 -32:25:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119509_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119509_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:43.39 -31:55:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119514_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119514_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119525_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119525_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:46.93 -31:30:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119542_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119542_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:03.42 -31:32:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119562_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119562_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:05.24 -37:10:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119570_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119570_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:26.80 -32:31:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119595_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119595_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:30.62 -30:18:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119597_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119597_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:38.07 -33:02:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119641_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119641_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:21.37 -32:58:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119645_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119645_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119648_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119648_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:34.96 -34:20:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119657_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119657_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:09.58 -30:15:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119664_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119664_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:11.24 -33:35:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119688_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119688_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:20.27 -36:49:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119691_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119691_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:00:52.68 -34:52:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119718_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119718_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:29.71 -31:28:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119730_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119730_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119773_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119773_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:06.32 -31:16:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119779_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119779_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:09.10 -34:24:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119780_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119780_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:28.18 -30:19:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119783_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119783_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:13.03 -32:41:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119794_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119794_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:59.24 -33:50:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119800_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119800_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:52.17 -33:56:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119831_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119831_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:24.46 -36:23:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119840_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
Preparing report for the candidate 119840_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119848_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119848_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:20.94 -35:06:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119861_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119861_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119887_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119887_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:11.76 -29:40:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119926_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119926_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119957_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119957_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:37.27 -31:24:47.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.01, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.99)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.139 6737147444955769472 280.90488816207 -31.41271019680 12.3282 11.0299 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.139#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119963_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119963_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:04.73 -29:52:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119981_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 119981_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114635_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 114635_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:45.41 -33:05:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37937_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 37937_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:06.64 -33:48:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23807_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
Preparing report for the candidate 23807_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96568_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
Preparing report for the candidate 96568_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77394_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
Preparing report for the candidate 77394_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88630_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
Preparing report for the candidate 88630_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35575_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 35575_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:44.14 -34:00:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118753_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 118753_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:48.33 -31:18:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10750_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 10750_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:15.20 -37:02:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86721_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 86721_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:09.47 -29:55:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10015_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174
The candidate 10015_fd_Sgr-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-19_04-14-11_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0174 did not pass the final checks