This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3979 2461179.8979 12.57 00:30:30.78 +59:50:48.6
120.30352 -2.91808 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 5.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J003030.91+595049.2
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.940 V 14.320 V 2458654.54770 83.826584100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits at 00:30:30.78 +59:50:48.6: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 00:30:30.78 +59:50:48.6: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 19.3980* 00 30 30.78 +59 50 48.6 12.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J003030.91+595049.2,2461179.8979,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J003030.91+595049.2 20260519.3979 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3979 2461179.8979 12.52 00:02:04.85 +59:23:32.2
116.67745 -2.87878 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 5.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ZTF J000205.05+592333.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.745 r Y 0.196 r 2458657.89150 40.783330300000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits at 00:02:04.85 +59:23:32.2: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 00:02:04.85 +59:23:32.2: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 19.3980* 00 02 04.85 +59 23 32.2 12.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J000205.05+592333.5,2461179.8979,12.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J000205.05+592333.5 20260519.3979 12.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3979 2461179.8979 12.60 23:04:17.43 +61:58:06.4
110.69896 1.66860 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2015172717979553024 | 23:04:17.36 +61:58:07.6 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=1.580+/-0.043 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits at 23:04:17.43 +61:58:06.4: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 23:04:17.43 +61:58:06.4: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2015172717979553024,2461179.8979,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2015172717979553024 20260519.3979 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.56554947 21.01.2026 01:34:13.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
First image: 2461061.56554947 21.01.2026 01:34:13.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Last image: 2461179.89824045 19.05.2026 09:33:17.975 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.70
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24759
Objects passed selection criteria: 24653
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 17403.8
Average stars matched: 17244 (99.0821 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 129932 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 04:36:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.56554947 21.01.2026 01:34:13.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
First image: 2461061.56554947 21.01.2026 01:34:13.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Last image: 2461179.89824045 19.05.2026 09:33:17.975 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 86
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 44 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 181475
Objects passed selection criteria: 180917
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 123334
Average stars matched: 120294 (97.5356 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1943604 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 04:42:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461179.89765537
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits'
wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Image size: 943.5'x628.6' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:58.597 +61:59:18.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.91"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:40.885 +61:59:27.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:58.597 +61:59:18.65
Second-epoch image center 23:59:40.885 +61:59:27.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0348 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:41.894 +61:59:58.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:58.597 +61:59:18.65
Second-epoch image center 23:59:41.894 +61:59:58.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0345 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:40.885 +61:59:27.95
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:41.894 +61:59:58.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00860 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kxDqcFhXTk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vV4o2VQPHA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YJ0D41vl6X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VmJ2SnqX2I
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30227 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0004 to 359.9985 deg, Dec +55.3299 to +67.4069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0004 to 359.9985 deg, Dec 55.3299 to 67.4069 deg
Loaded 133369 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1543 out of 1717 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 1717 out of 30227 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.70
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 30227 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0004 to 359.9985 deg, Dec +55.3299 to +67.4069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0004 to 359.9985 deg, Dec 55.3299 to 67.4069 deg
Loaded 133369 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1543 out of 1717 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 1717 out of 30227 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 25266 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0007 to 359.9981 deg, Dec +55.2924 to +67.4366 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0007 to 359.9981 deg, Dec 55.2924 to 67.4366 deg
Loaded 134115 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14213 out of 15744 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15744 out of 25266 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
2.1 pix Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
3.2 pix fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
15.0 mag. Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.8 (SNR ) 10.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.kxDqcFhXTk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3557, passed=30223
Got 30223 stars (including 26629 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30223 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013104 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010483 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.1650 through 0 to 19.9057, gap 19.9057 to 341.1650
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.1694 through 0 to 19.9053, gap 19.9053 to 341.1694
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28288 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.26"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=2.121 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.575 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.684 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.545 n_q1=166 n_q2=270 n_q3=234 n_q4=297 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.794
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits -region wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vV4o2VQPHA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2950, passed=25266
Got 25266 stars (including 22295 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25266 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.2805 through 0 to 20.0270, gap 20.0270 to 341.2805
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.2799 through 0 to 20.0270, gap 20.0270 to 341.2799
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.573 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=201 n_q2=259 n_q3=232 n_q4=287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits -region wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YJ0D41vl6X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=247, passed=7042
Got 7042 stars (including 6790 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7042 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.9910 through 0 to 19.6885, gap 19.6885 to 340.9910
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 787 (Dec 55.6 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6811 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.9893 through 0 to 19.6888, gap 19.6888 to 340.9893
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 787 (Dec 55.6 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.642 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.660 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.587 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.723 n_q1=229 n_q2=489 n_q3=135 n_q4=119 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VmJ2SnqX2I (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=240, passed=7523
Got 7523 stars (including 7278 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7523 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.9912 through 0 to 18.1714, gap 18.1714 to 340.9912
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7309 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.9900 through 0 to 18.1717, gap 18.1717 to 340.9900
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.651 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.508 n_q1=207 n_q2=257 n_q3=337 n_q4=169 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.200
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits sigma_overall=2.121 worst_q_ratio=0.794
ref2=Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits sigma_overall=0.476 worst_q_ratio=1.205
new1=fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.642 worst_q_ratio=1.127
new2=fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits sigma_overall=0.543 worst_q_ratio=1.200
reference average sigma_overall=1.2985 worst_q_ratio=0.9995
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009_astrometric_residuals.png (979 matched stars from wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15755_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 15755_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:48:13.88 +61:01:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28896_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 28896_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:19:03.03 +57:43:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Image size: 943.5'x628.6' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:58.597 +61:59:18.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.91"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:40.885 +61:59:27.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:58.597 +61:59:18.65
Second-epoch image center 23:59:40.885 +61:59:27.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0348 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:41.894 +61:59:58.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:58.597 +61:59:18.65
Second-epoch image center 23:59:41.894 +61:59:58.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0345 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:40.885 +61:59:27.95
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:41.894 +61:59:58.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00860 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vkwc7yqkeA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZmuLI0LoCA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gSJMrIxWLZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TvXN4PXfeO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 212671 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0000 to 359.9999 deg, Dec +55.2738 to +67.4144 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0000 to 359.9999 deg, Dec 55.2738 to 67.4144 deg
Loaded 134222 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1171 out of 1789 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 1789 out of 212671 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.816100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.816100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 212671 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0000 to 359.9999 deg, Dec +55.2738 to +67.4144 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0000 to 359.9999 deg, Dec 55.2738 to 67.4144 deg
Loaded 134222 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1171 out of 1789 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 1789 out of 212671 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 192191 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0000 to 360.0000 deg, Dec +55.2822 to +67.4366 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0000 to 360.0000 deg, Dec 55.2822 to 67.4366 deg
Loaded 134240 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11418 out of 16934 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16934 out of 192191 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 64 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
1.9 pix Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
3.2 pix fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
15.2 mag. Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 12.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Vkwc7yqkeA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=34581, passed=212618
Got 212618 stars (including 177731 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 212618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013104 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010483 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.1650 through 0 to 20.0662, gap 20.0662 to 341.1650
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 200391 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.1693 through 0 to 20.0648, gap 20.0648 to 341.1693
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 200407 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.25"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.839 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.521 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.513 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.591 n_q1=175 n_q2=256 n_q3=245 n_q4=284 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.865
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits -region wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZmuLI0LoCA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=49, blended=28937, passed=192142
Got 192142 stars (including 162924 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 192142 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.2056 through 0 to 20.1629, gap 20.1629 to 341.2056
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 187484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.2051 through 0 to 20.1627, gap 20.1627 to 341.2051
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 187481 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 187484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.403 n_q1=192 n_q2=254 n_q3=245 n_q4=287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits -region wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gSJMrIxWLZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2333, passed=42328
Got 42328 stars (including 39939 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42328 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.9363 through 0 to 19.7972, gap 19.7972 to 340.9363
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40528 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.9341 through 0 to 19.7973, gap 19.7973 to 340.9341
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.612 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.625 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.647 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.631 n_q1=233 n_q2=468 n_q3=146 n_q4=125 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.057
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TvXN4PXfeO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2364, passed=48974
Got 48974 stars (including 46566 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48974 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.9357 through 0 to 19.0355, gap 19.0355 to 340.9357
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.9345 through 0 to 19.0357, gap 19.0357 to 340.9345
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47735 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47735 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.631 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.509 n_q1=215 n_q2=251 n_q3=342 n_q4=160 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-32-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0363.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043421_TTUQ1b1x1_867021_R9lyDs17/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits at 23:59:25.70 +57:41:17.8: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits at 23:55:16.93 +58:06:29.5: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits at 23:24:20.94 +61:36:22.6: 13.28 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits at 23:28:16.37 +60:02:35.9: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 23:59:25.70 +57:41:17.8: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 23:55:16.93 +58:06:29.5: 12.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:59:25.70 +57:41:17.8: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3566 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 23:24:20.94 +61:36:22.6: 12.97 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 23:28:16.37 +60:02:35.9: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:16.93 +58:06:29.5: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3676 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:20.94 +61:36:22.6: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.4416 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:16.37 +60:02:35.9: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3481 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits at 00:30:30.78 +59:50:48.6: 14.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits at 00:25:15.62 +60:23:10.4: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 00:30:30.78 +59:50:48.6: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:30:30.78 +59:50:48.6: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5233 delta=1.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 00:25:15.62 +60:23:10.4: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:15.62 +60:23:10.4: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1315 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits at 00:02:04.85 +59:23:32.2: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-34-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0015.fits at 23:04:17.43 +61:58:06.4: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 00:02:04.85 +59:23:32.2: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:02:04.85 +59:23:32.2: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4371 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_20-23-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0009.fits at 23:04:17.43 +61:58:06.4: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:04:17.43 +61:58:06.4: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6089 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130564.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out153411.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90889.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233217_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 233217_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:16:12.75 +60:59:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233270_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 233270_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:28:33.37 +56:53:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233322_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 233322_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:21:25.48 +59:13:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233431_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 233431_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:56:38.24 +59:13:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233434_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 233434_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:24:56.04 +61:36:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233440_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 233440_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:56:22.13 +60:44:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233526_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 233526_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:36:19.59 +60:18:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233529_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 233529_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:55:26.59 +58:05:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233536_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 233536_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:12:15.51 +57:19:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233545_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 233545_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:24:24.32 +61:38:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233681_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 233681_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:24:38.41 +61:37:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233709_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 233709_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:24:23.64 +61:37:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233727_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 233727_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233735_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 233735_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233809_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 233809_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233846_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 233846_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:25:04.68 +61:35:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233899_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 233899_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:38:41.38 +61:19:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233901_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 233901_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:14:09.64 +62:12:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233913_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 233913_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234026_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 234026_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:04:36.52 +64:05:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234081_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 234081_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:20:43.28 +61:14:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234127_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 234127_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:42:41.29 +61:39:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180344_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 180344_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:19:03.06 +57:43:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163271_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 163271_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:08:55.56 +57:03:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117478_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 117478_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:28:08.39 +60:29:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130564_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
Preparing report for the candidate 130564_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120989_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 120989_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120176_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 120176_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:48:13.92 +61:01:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93380_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 93380_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:53:02.59 +60:35:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143480_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 143480_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:00:37.02 +59:53:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123855_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 123855_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114699_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 114699_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:58:00.69 +59:33:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131202_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 131202_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:04:40.28 +60:22:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118210_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 118210_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126783_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 126783_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:53:41.85 +59:14:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16087_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 16087_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99677_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 99677_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:46:09.74 +60:35:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187990_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 187990_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:24:11.87 +57:57:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153411_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
Preparing report for the candidate 153411_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133125_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 133125_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:04:36.12 +60:18:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141748_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 141748_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:54:53.77 +58:33:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132850_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 132850_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:16:55.16 +60:26:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90889_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
Preparing report for the candidate 90889_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118027_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 118027_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:41:27.12 +60:04:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83681_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 83681_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153050_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 153050_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:00:30.68 +59:33:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89168_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 89168_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:24:47.29 +61:49:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162682_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 162682_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:09:12.36 +59:08:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168999_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 168999_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:06:16.63 +58:26:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58089_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 58089_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:32:59.64 +62:55:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189532_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 189532_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:47:03.89 +58:39:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130434_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 130434_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:30:19.85 +59:58:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92638_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 92638_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:24:50.67 +62:16:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117512_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 117512_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:36:27.22 +60:19:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 212487_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 212487_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:54:23.08 +57:29:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98602_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 98602_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:20:14.59 +61:58:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 211698_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 211698_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:47:02.02 +57:27:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144365_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 144365_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:22:32.77 +60:08:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187709_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 187709_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:30:02.25 +58:32:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95617_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 95617_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:56:42.31 +60:42:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99570_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 99570_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:56:47.02 +60:21:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97430_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 97430_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:55:18.59 +60:21:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86195_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 86195_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:53:03.80 +61:07:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155571_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364
The candidate 155571_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-33-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0364 did not pass the final checks