This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3934 2461179.8934 10.44 16:39:59.59 -20:45:13.3
358.09217 16.85790 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.21 Lutetia 2 -0 2 10.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:39:59.59 -20:45:13.3: 15.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:39:59.59 -20:45:13.3: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.8934,10.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.3934 10.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3934 2461179.8934 11.84 16:38:47.43 -22:40:59.2
356.34510 15.86255 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.24 Themis 0 0 0 11.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:38:47.43 -22:40:59.2: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:38:47.43 -22:40:59.2: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.8934,11.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.3934 11.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3934 2461179.8934 12.02 16:55:35.13 -14:03:38.4
6.04075 17.89540 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 1 -0 1 12.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:55:35.13 -14:03:38.4: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:55:35.13 -14:03:38.4: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.8934,12.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.3934 12.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3934 2461179.8934 12.21 17:10:59.21 -16:17:21.8
6.32361 13.57107 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.119 Althaea 1 -0 1 12.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:10:59.21 -16:17:21.8: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:10:59.21 -16:17:21.8: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.8934,12.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.3934 12.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3934 2461179.8934 12.87 17:05:55.73 -22:44:03.2
0.21610 10.86326 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.121 Hermione 2 -0 2 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:05:55.73 -22:44:03.2: 14.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:05:55.73 -22:44:03.2: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.8934,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.3934 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3934 2461179.8934 13.52 16:37:53.87 -15:40:05.0
1.99113 20.38859 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.364 Isara 2 -1 2 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:37:53.87 -15:40:05.0: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:37:53.87 -15:40:05.0: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.8934,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.3934 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.3934 2461179.8934 13.95 16:40:06.70 -17:13:34.6
1.02478 19.01667 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.358 Apollonia 2 0 2 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:40:06.70 -17:13:34.6: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:40:06.70 -17:13:34.6: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.8934,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.3934 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
First image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Last image: 2461179.89369111 19.05.2026 09:26:44.912 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 17
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.11
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6929
Objects passed selection criteria: 6929
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6682
Average stars matched: 6266 (93.7743 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112696 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 04:29:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
First image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Last image: 2461179.89369111 19.05.2026 09:26:44.912 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 123
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 32 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 75880
Objects passed selection criteria: 75806
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 71458.2
Average stars matched: 65609.2 (91.8148 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1867000 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 04:32:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461179.89318714
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Image size: 941.3'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:20.143 -17:59:54.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:20.143 -17:59:54.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0390 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Image size: 941.3'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:17.508 -17:59:16.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:17.508 -17:59:16.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0247 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:20.143 -17:59:54.97
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:17.508 -17:59:16.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01487 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E1uTP2JBon
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TOkuvstiw4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jfR646ZbDo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qQfzZM1vBk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Loaded 6041 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4269 out of 4396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4396 out of 6602 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.617200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.617200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.11
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Loaded 6041 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4269 out of 4396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4396 out of 6602 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7698 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.4593 to 261.6825 deg, Dec -23.5868 to -12.1003 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.4593 to 261.6825 deg, Dec -23.5868 to -12.1003 deg
Loaded 6563 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4621 out of 4787 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4787 out of 7698 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 17 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.6 mag. Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.E1uTP2JBon (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, passed=6602
Got 6602 stars (including 6214 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.2 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.2 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.617 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.760 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.602 n_q1=163 n_q2=379 n_q3=154 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TOkuvstiw4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=483, passed=7698
Got 7698 stars (including 7205 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7698 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=181 n_q2=332 n_q3=168 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.064
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jfR646ZbDo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=219, passed=6123
Got 6123 stars (including 5892 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6123 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.583 n_q1=297 n_q2=148 n_q3=342 n_q4=151 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qQfzZM1vBk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=261, passed=6496
Got 6496 stars (including 6228 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6496 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.579 n_q1=295 n_q2=152 n_q3=341 n_q4=151 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.253
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits sigma_overall=0.617 worst_q_ratio=1.232
ref2=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.064
new1=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits sigma_overall=0.498 worst_q_ratio=1.171
new2=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits sigma_overall=0.462 worst_q_ratio=1.253
reference average sigma_overall=0.5055 worst_q_ratio=1.148
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:39:59.59 -20:45:13.3: 15.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:24:06.45 -18:06:40.8: 11.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:02:18.94 -16:23:32.2: 11.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:39:59.59 -20:45:13.3: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:02:18.94 -16:23:32.2: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:24:06.45 -18:06:40.8: 11.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:18.94 -16:23:32.2: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6675 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:24:06.45 -18:06:40.8: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6775 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21504.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21504_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
Preparing report for the candidate 21504_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21510_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 21510_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:39.97 -19:08:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21512_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 21512_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:33.56 -14:35:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21516_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 21516_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:06.12 -16:58:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21517_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 21517_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:14.13 -22:01:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21521_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 21521_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:24.87 -20:41:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21523_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 21523_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:51.80 -18:32:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21524_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 21524_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:21.94 -17:20:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21525_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 21525_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:37.58 -18:06:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21528_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 21528_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:49.14 -17:14:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21529_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 21529_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21530_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 21530_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21532_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 21532_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:25.96 -16:42:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03060_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 03060_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:56.56 -18:48:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20284_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 20284_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:15.25 -17:09:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20839_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 20839_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:49.95 -20:12:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04925_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 04925_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:45.66 -16:05:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:39:59.59 -20:45:13.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Image size: 941.3'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:20.143 -17:59:54.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:20.143 -17:59:54.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0390 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Image size: 941.3'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:17.508 -17:59:16.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:17.508 -17:59:16.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0247 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:20.143 -17:59:54.97
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:17.508 -17:59:16.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01487 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PPOHBo3qn7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fcPLewixiI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8h8fotpsgG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t4hcVIYbZa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 76360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Loaded 6087 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4580 out of 5201 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5201 out of 76360 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.389800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.389800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.66
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 76360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Loaded 6087 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4580 out of 5201 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5201 out of 76360 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 90958 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.4593 to 261.6928 deg, Dec -23.6085 to -12.1003 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.4593 to 261.6928 deg, Dec -23.6085 to -12.1003 deg
Loaded 6585 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4745 out of 5431 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5431 out of 90958 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 112 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.1 pix Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PPOHBo3qn7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=4634, passed=76351
Got 76351 stars (including 71611 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76351 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.673 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.782 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.638 n_q1=166 n_q2=382 n_q3=135 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fcPLewixiI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=5325, passed=90947
Got 90947 stars (including 85457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 90947 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89497 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.446 n_q1=182 n_q2=325 n_q3=175 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.072
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8h8fotpsgG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=2458, passed=57191
Got 57191 stars (including 54651 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57191 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56007 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.615 n_q1=293 n_q2=159 n_q3=333 n_q4=156 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.253
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.t4hcVIYbZa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2855, passed=63352
Got 63352 stars (including 60398 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63352 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61739 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61737 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61737 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.603 n_q1=292 n_q2=157 n_q3=342 n_q4=149 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.311
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0355.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_042718_TTUQ1b1x1_624674_plUSdLXb/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:10:04.65 -20:49:19.3: 13.45 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:49:12.80 -17:48:06.5: 14.00 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:25:26.87 -19:17:01.7: 13.51 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:11:20.41 -16:58:21.5: 13.70 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:13:02.99 -14:29:14.9: 13.98 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:17:24.75 -18:59:47.1: 12.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:05:44.36 -20:06:05.7: 13.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:55:35.13 -14:03:38.4: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:38:47.43 -22:40:59.2: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:10:59.21 -16:17:21.8: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:49:12.80 -17:48:06.5: 13.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:11:20.41 -16:58:21.5: 13.84 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:10:04.65 -20:49:19.3: 13.40 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:25:26.87 -19:17:01.7: 13.64 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:17:24.75 -18:59:47.1: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:13:02.99 -14:29:14.9: 14.32 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:49:12.80 -17:48:06.5: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8709 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:20.41 -16:58:21.5: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9656 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:04.65 -20:49:19.3: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5096 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:13:02.99 -14:29:14.9: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0581 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:17:24.75 -18:59:47.1: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8249 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:26.87 -19:17:01.7: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5075 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:05:44.36 -20:06:05.7: 13.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:05:44.36 -20:06:05.7: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8892 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:55:35.13 -14:03:38.4: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:10:59.21 -16:17:21.8: 15.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:38:47.43 -22:40:59.2: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:14:25.12 -17:28:34.3: 12.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:07:27.36 -19:15:01.7: 12.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:05:55.73 -22:44:03.2: 14.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:14:25.12 -17:28:34.3: 13.02 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:14:25.12 -17:28:34.3: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9160 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:07:27.36 -19:15:01.7: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:05:55.73 -22:44:03.2: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:27.36 -19:15:01.7: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9144 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:37:53.87 -15:40:05.0: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:25:19.15 -20:08:36.5: 14.20 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:37:53.87 -15:40:05.0: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:21:14.15 -22:52:15.4: 14.49 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:25:19.15 -20:08:36.5: 14.13 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:19.15 -20:08:36.5: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4535 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:21:14.15 -22:52:15.4: 14.18 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:14.15 -22:52:15.4: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6325 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:56:16.21 -15:22:49.8: 13.62 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:24:16.35 -13:42:40.1: 14.22 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:25:17.78 -16:22:14.5: 13.94 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:56:16.21 -15:22:49.8: 13.67 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:56:16.21 -15:22:49.8: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7547 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:24:16.35 -13:42:40.1: 14.56 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:24:16.35 -13:42:40.1: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8773 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:25:17.78 -16:22:14.5: 14.13 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:17.78 -16:22:14.5: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8627 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:23:35.44 -17:45:45.4: 13.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:23:35.44 -17:45:45.4: 14.07 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:40:06.70 -17:13:34.6: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:23:35.44 -17:45:45.4: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7009 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:24:55.07 -13:35:05.9: 14.51 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:02:19.41 -15:23:57.4: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:16:16.03 -20:46:12.3: 14.03 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:40:06.70 -17:13:34.6: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:24:55.07 -13:35:05.9: 14.87 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:24:55.07 -13:35:05.9: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.1013 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:02:19.41 -15:23:57.4: 15.09 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.24
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:02:19.41 -15:23:57.4: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.24 new_mean_mag=13.9332 delta=1.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:16:16.03 -20:46:12.3: 14.08 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:16:16.03 -20:46:12.3: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6421 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:20:55.26 -18:30:18.2: 14.41 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:20:55.26 -18:30:18.2: 14.34 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:55.26 -18:30:18.2: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9950 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:21:44.47 -19:14:42.7: 14.37 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:21:44.47 -19:14:42.7: 14.76 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:44.47 -19:14:42.7: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0422 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:57:18.37 -19:03:03.7: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:21:32.12 -17:24:20.7: 14.02 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:57:18.37 -19:03:03.7: 14.77 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:18.37 -19:03:03.7: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.0085 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:21:32.12 -17:24:20.7: 14.62 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:32.12 -17:24:20.7: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0184 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:34:44.39 -12:55:22.1: 14.89 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:56:57.74 -14:11:41.2: 14.49 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:34:44.39 -12:55:22.1: 14.33 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:44.39 -12:55:22.1: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2748 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:56:57.74 -14:11:41.2: 14.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:56:57.74 -14:11:41.2: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2748 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:22:46.05 -14:46:03.7: 14.57 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:12:20.50 -15:48:08.6: 14.95 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:12:16.10 -18:46:58.1: 14.45 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:22:46.05 -14:46:03.7: 14.48 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:12:20.50 -15:48:08.6: 15.23 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:22:46.05 -14:46:03.7: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1685 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:12:20.50 -15:48:08.6: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.0554 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:12:16.10 -18:46:58.1: 14.68 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:16.10 -18:46:58.1: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.1096 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:25:41.41 -14:15:00.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:25:41.41 -14:15:00.3: 12.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:41.41 -14:15:00.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out108605.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out108687.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108219.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108220.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108226.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108310.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108411.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out108601.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108162_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108162_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108166_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108166_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108169_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108169_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108175_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108175_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108178_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108178_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108179_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108179_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:01.25 -21:52:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108180_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108180_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:21.84 -14:23:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108187_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108187_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108190_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108190_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108194_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108194_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:59.60 -20:45:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108219_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
Preparing report for the candidate 108219_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108220_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
Preparing report for the candidate 108220_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108226_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
Preparing report for the candidate 108226_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108243_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108243_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:56.51 -16:08:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108246_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108246_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:06.15 -21:13:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108247_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108247_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:46.48 -18:21:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108265_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108265_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:13.48 -20:44:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108294_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108294_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:25.16 -14:20:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108302_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108302_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108308_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108308_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:59.97 -21:58:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108310_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
Preparing report for the candidate 108310_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108311_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108311_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:29.23 -22:42:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108312_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108312_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:24.04 -16:12:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108314_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108314_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:41.20 -18:31:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108322_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108322_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108324_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108324_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:52.70 -21:44:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108348_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108348_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:34.28 -16:44:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108358_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108358_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:55.53 -13:09:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108359_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108359_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:38.13 -14:37:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108363_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108363_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:22.99 -14:00:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108366_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108366_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108379_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108379_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:29.74 -16:41:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108393_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108393_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:09.06 -15:54:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108400_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108400_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:52.34 -20:05:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108401_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108401_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:10.04 -13:55:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108411_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
Preparing report for the candidate 108411_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108414_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108414_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:15.21 -19:06:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108419_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108419_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:55.22 -13:37:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108427_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108427_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:35.88 -22:43:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108433_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108433_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:30.13 -18:54:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108440_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108440_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:57.67 -14:40:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108446_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108446_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:02.34 -20:30:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108454_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108454_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:46.42 -13:55:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108475_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108475_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108481_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108481_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:59.66 -17:22:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108482_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108482_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:45.21 -15:50:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108499_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108499_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:32.64 -16:23:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108504_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108504_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108505_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108505_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:39.81 -18:00:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108509_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108509_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:55.31 -13:45:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108514_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108514_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:33.63 -21:18:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108524_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108524_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:35.86 -14:18:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108530_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108530_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108531_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108531_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:21.86 -16:18:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108534_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108534_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108551_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108551_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:47.38 -20:22:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108568_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108568_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108573_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108573_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:46.36 -21:21:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108579_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108579_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:22.22 -21:35:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108581_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108581_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108587_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108587_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:11.26 -16:35:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108592_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108592_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:46.14 -14:09:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108601_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
Preparing report for the candidate 108601_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108603_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108603_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108605_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108605_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:19.41 -15:23:57.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.268 4139300643064675456 255.58105500785 -15.39897123911 13.1642 11.8522 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.268#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108607_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108607_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108633_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108633_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108640_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108640_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:17.59 -14:31:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108644_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108644_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108646_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108646_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:00.37 -16:22:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108647_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108647_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108657_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108657_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108659_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108659_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108676_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108676_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108679_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108679_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:31.57 -14:58:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108684_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108684_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:29.61 -18:06:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108687_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108687_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:20.50 -15:48:08.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.07, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.05)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.683 4136308425254941952 258.08528834728 -15.80165401834 12.4029 10.8539 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.683#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108689_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108689_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108690_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 108690_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48402_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 48402_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:49.15 -17:14:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50158_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 50158_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:06.12 -16:58:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10122_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 10122_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:09.51 -21:29:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21070_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 21070_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:17.03 -20:06:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70330_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 70330_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:07.46 -15:27:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87647_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 87647_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22381_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 22381_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:49.96 -20:12:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68411_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 68411_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:38.90 -15:05:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50122_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 50122_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:15.22 -17:09:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41742_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 41742_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:14.80 -17:55:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61883_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 61883_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:38.51 -14:09:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91355_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 91355_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:51.80 -18:32:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33988_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 33988_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:16.00 -18:56:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27251_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 27251_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:05.72 -19:40:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90880_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 90880_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:20.14 -20:59:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41466_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 41466_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:31.57 -18:05:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98135_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 98135_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:25.21 -19:53:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16217_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 16217_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:24.84 -20:41:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74166_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 74166_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:45.67 -16:05:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90241_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 90241_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:08.10 -20:30:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90161_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 90161_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:45.44 -15:48:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64188_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 64188_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:33.56 -14:35:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34085_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 34085_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:56.56 -18:48:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02167_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 02167_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:09.48 -22:44:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13120_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 13120_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:29.90 -21:07:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31039_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 31039_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:39.96 -19:08:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27220_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 27220_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:20.09 -19:22:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01697_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 01697_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:55.31 -22:43:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47842_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 47842_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:44.35 -17:15:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88848_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 88848_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:49.91 -23:11:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49054_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 49054_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:21.94 -17:20:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05907_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 05907_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:14.13 -22:01:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42070_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356
The candidate 42070_fd_Oph-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_04-26-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356 did not pass the final checks
