This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1855 2461179.6855 10.63 15:26:18.20 -21:52:42.0
344.18360 28.32581 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.70 Panopaea 2 -1 2 10.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:26:18.20 -21:52:42.0: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:26:18.20 -21:52:42.0: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.6855,10.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.1855 10.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1855 2461179.6855 12.69 14:54:21.64 -22:10:01.8
337.03869 32.44046 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.362 Havnia 2 -0 2 12.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:54:21.64 -22:10:01.8: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:54:21.64 -22:10:01.8: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.6855,12.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.1855 12.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1855 2461179.6855 13.51 15:46:31.33 -21:27:37.3
348.46033 25.54935 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.229 Adelinda 3 -2 3 14.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:46:31.33 -21:27:37.3: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:46:31.33 -21:27:37.3: 15.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.6855,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.1855 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1855 2461179.6855 13.40 15:29:12.10 -24:01:59.5
343.23516 26.23343 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.541 Deborah 3 0 3 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:29:12.10 -24:01:59.5: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:29:12.10 -24:01:59.5: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.6855,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.1855 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1855 2461179.6855 13.87 15:22:31.04 -21:15:58.3
343.84184 29.35530 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1343 Nicole 4 -1 4 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:22:31.04 -21:15:58.3: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:22:31.04 -21:15:58.3: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.6855,13.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.1855 13.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461140.90679434 10.04.2026 09:45:37.031 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
First image: 2461140.90679434 10.04.2026 09:45:37.031 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Last image: 2461179.68572227 19.05.2026 04:27:16.404 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 36
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7251
Objects passed selection criteria: 7250
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7004.25
Average stars matched: 6712 (95.8275 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112920 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 00:15:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461140.90679434 10.04.2026 09:45:37.031 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
First image: 2461140.90679434 10.04.2026 09:45:37.031 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Last image: 2461179.68572227 19.05.2026 04:27:16.404 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 42
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.87
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 53767
Objects passed selection criteria: 53665
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 48788
Average stars matched: 47251.2 (96.8501 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 156540 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue May 19 00:17:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461179.68523433
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits'
wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:46.981 -26:00:11.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Image size: 941.2'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:35.807 -25:59:15.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:21:46.981 -26:00:11.01
Second-epoch image center 15:21:35.807 -25:59:15.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0446 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:33.307 -25:59:01.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:21:46.981 -26:00:11.01
Second-epoch image center 15:21:33.307 -25:59:01.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0548 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:21:35.807 -25:59:15.71
Second-epoch second image center 15:21:33.307 -25:59:01.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01020 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lgcD7b4kD8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BHS1V3bLfM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sKoe2TSLN3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OAvvpeXumg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7201 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 220.9749 to 239.2375 deg, Dec -31.5358 to -20.0642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 220.9749 to 239.2375 deg, Dec -31.5358 to -20.0642 deg
Loaded 7943 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5052 out of 5263 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5263 out of 7201 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.691100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.691100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.54
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.54
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7201 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 220.9749 to 239.2375 deg, Dec -31.5358 to -20.0642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 220.9749 to 239.2375 deg, Dec -31.5358 to -20.0642 deg
Loaded 7943 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5052 out of 5263 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5263 out of 7201 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 7308 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 221.4484 to 239.5880 deg, Dec -31.2802 to -20.4463 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 221.4484 to 239.5880 deg, Dec -31.2802 to -20.4463 deg
Loaded 7407 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5126 out of 5277 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5277 out of 7308 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 30 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
2.3 pix Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
3.3 pix fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
3.3 pix fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
14.4 mag. Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lgcD7b4kD8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=570, passed=7201
Got 7201 stars (including 6619 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7201 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7039 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=209 n_q2=212 n_q3=296 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -region wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BHS1V3bLfM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=471, passed=7308
Got 7308 stars (including 6831 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7308 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7219 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.697 n_q1=219 n_q2=256 n_q3=251 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sKoe2TSLN3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=300, passed=6855
Got 6855 stars (including 6553 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6855 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=244 n_q2=257 n_q3=239 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OAvvpeXumg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=302, passed=6819
Got 6819 stars (including 6516 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6819 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=240 n_q2=259 n_q3=239 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits sigma_overall=0.433 worst_q_ratio=1.245
ref2=Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits sigma_overall=0.581 worst_q_ratio=1.201
new1=fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits sigma_overall=0.333 worst_q_ratio=1.217
new2=fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.145
reference average sigma_overall=0.507 worst_q_ratio=1.223
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:00:42.49 -20:34:24.6: 11.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:54:35.52 -20:28:00.4: 11.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:26:18.20 -21:52:42.0: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:19:37.13 -25:13:50.3: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:48:00.37 -25:49:11.5: 12.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:51:05.77 -20:39:07.4: 11.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:28:34.12 -24:29:59.6: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:25:36.75 -26:01:27.6: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:38:08.06 -28:10:30.4: 11.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:51:05.77 -20:39:07.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:05.77 -20:39:07.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:54:35.52 -20:28:00.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:35.52 -20:28:00.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:00:42.49 -20:34:24.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:42.49 -20:34:24.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:55:28.59 -20:38:08.2: 11.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:55:28.59 -20:38:08.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:28.59 -20:38:08.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:26:18.20 -21:52:42.0: 15.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:25:36.75 -26:01:27.6: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:19:37.13 -25:13:50.3: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:25:36.75 -26:01:27.6: ref_mag=11.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5199 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:19:37.13 -25:13:50.3: ref_mag=11.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5027 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:38:08.06 -28:10:30.4: 11.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:48:00.37 -25:49:11.5: 12.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:28:34.12 -24:29:59.6: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:08.06 -28:10:30.4: ref_mag=11.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4783 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:00.37 -25:49:11.5: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4043 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:28:34.12 -24:29:59.6: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5134 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:17:12.31 -25:25:04.1: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:11:53.92 -20:45:32.0: 11.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:18:34.44 -26:18:08.0: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:14:58.92 -24:38:24.9: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:15:53.20 -24:53:03.0: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:18:59.45 -26:19:57.7: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:17:03.64 -25:26:25.6: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:13:34.70 -25:05:37.8: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:05:27.41 -20:35:36.8: 11.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:17:12.31 -25:25:04.1: 11.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:11:53.92 -20:45:32.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:11:53.92 -20:45:32.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:17:12.31 -25:25:04.1: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6165 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:05:27.41 -20:35:36.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:27.41 -20:35:36.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:18:34.44 -26:18:08.0: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:34.44 -26:18:08.0: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6146 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:14:58.92 -24:38:24.9: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:14:58.92 -24:38:24.9: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6272 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:15:53.20 -24:53:03.0: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:15:53.20 -24:53:03.0: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6421 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:18:59.45 -26:19:57.7: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:17:03.64 -25:26:25.6: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:13:34.70 -25:05:37.8: 11.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:59.45 -26:19:57.7: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6118 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:17:03.64 -25:26:25.6: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6372 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:13:34.70 -25:05:37.8: ref_mag=11.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6330 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:19:47.68 -23:59:12.0: 11.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:17:25.31 -21:40:51.8: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:17:45.15 -25:19:02.2: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:14:05.63 -25:07:20.6: 11.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:14:41.83 -25:49:30.0: 11.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:23:31.04 -27:59:45.3: 11.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:27:37.64 -27:19:58.9: 11.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:19:47.68 -23:59:12.0: 11.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:17:45.15 -25:19:02.2: 11.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:17:25.31 -21:40:51.8: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:19:47.68 -23:59:12.0: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6653 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:17:45.15 -25:19:02.2: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6507 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:17:25.31 -21:40:51.8: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6739 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:14:05.63 -25:07:20.6: 11.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:14:05.63 -25:07:20.6: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6676 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:14:41.83 -25:49:30.0: 11.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:23:31.04 -27:59:45.3: 11.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:27:37.64 -27:19:58.9: 11.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:14:41.83 -25:49:30.0: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6780 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:23:31.04 -27:59:45.3: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6373 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:27:37.64 -27:19:58.9: ref_mag=11.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6836 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20930.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20930_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
Preparing report for the candidate 20930_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20934_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20934_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:01:52.49 -25:20:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20935_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20935_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20940_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20940_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20941_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20941_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20942_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20942_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20943_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20943_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20944_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20944_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20945_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20945_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20948_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20948_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20949_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20949_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20952_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20952_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:36:12.70 -21:09:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20954_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20954_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20956_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20956_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20957_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20957_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20959_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20959_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20960_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20960_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20962_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20962_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20963_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20963_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20966_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20966_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20967_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20967_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20968_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20968_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20970_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20970_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20971_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20971_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20972_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20972_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20973_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20973_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:31:29.18 -25:40:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20974_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20974_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20975_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20975_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20977_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 20977_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06318_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 06318_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:01:46.31 -30:14:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
15:26:18.20 -21:52:42.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:46.981 -26:00:11.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Image size: 941.2'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:35.807 -25:59:15.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:21:46.981 -26:00:11.01
Second-epoch image center 15:21:35.807 -25:59:15.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0446 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:33.307 -25:59:01.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:21:46.981 -26:00:11.01
Second-epoch image center 15:21:33.307 -25:59:01.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0548 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:21:35.807 -25:59:15.71
Second-epoch second image center 15:21:33.307 -25:59:01.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01020 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n3ihd7b8in
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2I0wo8Ard0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mgjijstPWi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yKgw6pvEcz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62827 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 220.9429 to 239.2479 deg, Dec -31.5417 to -20.0548 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 220.9429 to 239.2479 deg, Dec -31.5417 to -20.0548 deg
Loaded 7989 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5812 out of 6412 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6412 out of 62827 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.545900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.545900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.87
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.68
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.68
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62827 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 220.9429 to 239.2479 deg, Dec -31.5417 to -20.0548 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 220.9429 to 239.2479 deg, Dec -31.5417 to -20.0548 deg
Loaded 7989 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5812 out of 6412 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6412 out of 62827 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 57360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 221.3900 to 239.5974 deg, Dec -31.2822 to -20.4459 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 221.3900 to 239.5974 deg, Dec -31.2822 to -20.4459 deg
Loaded 7433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5759 out of 6269 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6269 out of 57360 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 29 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
2.1 pix Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
3.2 pix fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
3.2 pix fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
14.6 mag. Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.n3ihd7b8in (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2899, passed=62803
Got 62803 stars (including 59788 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62803 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61258 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61261 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61261 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.400 n_q1=213 n_q2=212 n_q3=289 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.226
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits -region wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2I0wo8Ard0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2875, passed=57345
Got 57345 stars (including 54370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57345 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.557 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.671 n_q1=226 n_q2=247 n_q3=263 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mgjijstPWi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1618, passed=38474
Got 38474 stars (including 36812 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38474 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=237 n_q2=244 n_q3=251 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yKgw6pvEcz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1558, passed=38025
Got 38025 stars (including 36430 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38025 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=239 n_q2=246 n_q3=250 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-26-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-19_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_001051_TTUQ1b1x1_1375583_1AeIkFLF/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:54:21.64 -22:10:01.8: 15.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:47:42.42 -29:44:56.6: 13.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:55:24.80 -20:33:38.9: 14.21 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:46:31.33 -21:27:37.3: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:55:24.80 -20:33:38.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:24.80 -20:33:38.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:29:12.10 -24:01:59.5: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:22:31.04 -21:15:58.3: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:33:22.69 -27:09:42.7: 12.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:54:21.64 -22:10:01.8: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:47:42.42 -29:44:56.6: 13.70 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:42.42 -29:44:56.6: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.8698 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:51:46.03 -20:48:33.2: 14.52 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 15:25:05.32 -22:02:22.0: 14.39 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:55:17.13 -20:53:10.6: 14.75 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:29:12.10 -24:01:59.5: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:22:31.04 -21:15:58.3: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:46:31.33 -21:27:37.3: 15.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:33:22.69 -27:09:42.7: 12.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:33:22.69 -27:09:42.7: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1764 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:51:46.03 -20:48:33.2: 14.26 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:25:05.32 -22:02:22.0: 14.12 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:46.03 -20:48:33.2: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1059 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:25:05.32 -22:02:22.0: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0147 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:55:17.13 -20:53:10.6: 14.56 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:17.13 -20:53:10.6: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.1060 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:47:06.48 -28:11:05.8: 12.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:48:00.20 -26:48:32.6: 12.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-10_04-45-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0247.fits at 14:49:21.73 -27:41:49.5: 12.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:47:06.48 -28:11:05.8: 12.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:47:06.48 -28:11:05.8: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4656 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:48:00.20 -26:48:32.6: 12.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:00.20 -26:48:32.6: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6058 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:49:21.73 -27:41:49.5: 13.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:21.73 -27:41:49.5: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8574 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78726.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78761.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78762.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78808.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78695_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 78695_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:46:35.67 -29:57:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78698_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 78698_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:50:19.23 -29:30:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78703_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 78703_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:26:18.20 -21:52:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78726_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
Preparing report for the candidate 78726_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78727_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 78727_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:37.96 -29:15:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78740_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 78740_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:31:07.31 -23:38:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78741_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 78741_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:56.47 -27:54:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78742_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 78742_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:41.38 -25:17:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78744_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 78744_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:51:19.71 -20:37:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78746_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 78746_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78755_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 78755_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78761_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
Preparing report for the candidate 78761_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78762_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
Preparing report for the candidate 78762_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78767_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 78767_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:27:02.53 -24:30:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78775_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 78775_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:07:24.36 -25:36:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78777_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 78777_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:27:43.54 -25:09:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78784_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 78784_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78808_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
Preparing report for the candidate 78808_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78810_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 78810_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78812_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 78812_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78824_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 78824_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72954_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 72954_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:48:14.60 -29:23:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45047_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 45047_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:56:01.77 -26:42:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72960_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 72960_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72934_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 72934_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:47:55.34 -29:17:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72929_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 72929_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:47:23.33 -29:24:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72927_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 72927_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72899_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 72899_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40998_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121
The candidate 40998_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_23-27-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks