This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1568 2461179.6568 11.96 09:33:32.88 +11:42:11.0
221.31024 41.20806 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.41 Daphne -3 2 3 12.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:33:32.88 +11:42:11.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:33:32.88 +11:42:11.0: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 19.1568* 09 33 32.88 +11 42 11.0 12.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.6568,11.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.1568 11.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1568 2461179.6568 13.21 09:48:12.33 +09:24:33.3
226.29787 43.35986 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.67 Asia -5 2 5 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:48:12.33 +09:24:33.3: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:48:12.33 +09:24:33.3: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 19.1568* 09 48 12.33 +09 24 33.3 13.2 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.6568,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.1568 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1568 2461179.6568 13.31 10:03:09.32 +15:12:52.7
221.12201 49.21494 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.103 Hera -3 1 3 13.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:03:09.32 +15:12:52.7: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:03:09.32 +15:12:52.7: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 19.1568* 10 03 09.32 +15 12 52.7 13.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.6568,13.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.1568 13.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1568 2461179.6568 13.91 10:14:51.08 +15:30:43.7
222.51728 51.90811 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 0.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.161 Athor -2 1 2 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:14:51.08 +15:30:43.7: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:14:51.08 +15:30:43.7: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 19.1568* 10 14 51.08 +15 30 43.7 13.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.6568,13.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.1568 13.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1568 2461179.6568 13.96 09:49:10.73 +15:03:08.2
219.31611 46.06468 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 0.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.47 Aglaja -3 1 3 14.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:49:10.73 +15:03:08.2: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:49:10.73 +15:03:08.2: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 19.1568* 09 49 10.73 +15 03 08.2 14.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.6568,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.1568 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1568 2461179.6568 14.27 09:18:44.53 +16:13:24.8
213.95888 39.76207 galactic Cnc Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 1.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.203 Pompeja -4 2 4 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:18:44.53 +16:13:24.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:18:44.53 +16:13:24.8: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.6568,14.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.1568 14.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1568 2461179.6568 14.46 09:38:30.38 +18:42:57.8
213.10172 45.05554 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 1.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.213 Lilaea -2 1 2 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:38:30.38 +18:42:57.8: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:38:30.38 +18:42:57.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 19.1568* 09 38 30.38 +18 42 57.8 14.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.6568,14.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.1568 14.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1568 2461179.6568 14.77 10:08:27.31 +18:08:31.5
217.64771 51.51118 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 1.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.380 Fiducia -3 3 4 15.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:08:27.31 +18:08:31.5: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:08:27.31 +18:08:31.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 19.1568* 10 08 27.31 +18 08 31.5 14.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.6568,14.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.1568 14.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1568 2461179.6568 14.63 09:22:42.69 +09:56:23.8
221.82625 38.04093 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.4" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:22:42.69 +09:56:23.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:22:42.69 +09:56:23.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:22:42.69 +09:56:23.8: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 19.1568* 09 22 42.69 +09 56 23.8 14.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461179.6568,14.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260519.1568 14.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.68287475 20.03.2026 04:23:10.378 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461119.68287475 20.03.2026 04:23:10.378 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461179.65698554 19.05.2026 03:45:53.551 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7207
Objects passed selection criteria: 7205
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7010.75
Average stars matched: 6906 (98.5059 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113092 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 18 22:53:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.68287475 20.03.2026 04:23:10.378 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461119.68287475 20.03.2026 04:23:10.378 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461179.65698554 19.05.2026 03:45:53.551 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 115
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 41313
Objects passed selection criteria: 41201
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 39994.2
Average stars matched: 38336 (95.8538 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 141224 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 18 22:55:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461179.65660074
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:52.006 +14:00:40.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63
Second-epoch image center 09:46:52.006 +14:00:40.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0819 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:52.350 +14:00:38.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63
Second-epoch image center 09:46:52.350 +14:00:38.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0833 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:46:52.006 +14:00:40.09
Second-epoch second image center 09:46:52.350 +14:00:38.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00148 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00148 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wiP3mBxOYR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DOcpeFOnzP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fRh6Z3nxdA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uOeUT5rbyY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7795 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4789 to 154.9675 deg, Dec +8.5563 to +19.3047 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4789 to 154.9675 deg, Dec 8.5563 to 19.3047 deg
Loaded 4793 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3886 out of 4074 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4074 out of 7795 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.915650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.915650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7795 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4789 to 154.9675 deg, Dec +8.5563 to +19.3047 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4789 to 154.9675 deg, Dec 8.5563 to 19.3047 deg
Loaded 4793 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3886 out of 4074 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4074 out of 7795 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 7228 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4295 to 155.2660 deg, Dec +8.1771 to +19.5842 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4295 to 155.2660 deg, Dec 8.1771 to 19.5842 deg
Loaded 5215 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3899 out of 4084 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4084 out of 7228 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.1 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.wiP3mBxOYR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=485, passed=7795
Got 7795 stars (including 7304 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7795 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 906 stars left (next iteration limit 996)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.483 n_q1=277 n_q2=221 n_q3=218 n_q4=190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DOcpeFOnzP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=490, passed=7228
Got 7228 stars (including 6724 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7228 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits N_match=912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=202 n_q2=221 n_q3=206 n_q4=283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.190
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fRh6Z3nxdA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=417, passed=6646
Got 6646 stars (including 6217 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6646 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6439 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6438 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6438 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits N_match=912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=197 n_q2=224 n_q3=216 n_q4=275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uOeUT5rbyY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=421, passed=6554
Got 6554 stars (including 6122 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6554 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6343 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6343 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=195 n_q2=221 n_q3=216 n_q4=281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.455 worst_q_ratio=1.272
ref2=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits sigma_overall=0.309 worst_q_ratio=1.190
new1=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits sigma_overall=0.277 worst_q_ratio=1.118
new2=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits sigma_overall=0.317 worst_q_ratio=1.104
reference average sigma_overall=0.382 worst_q_ratio=1.231
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (906 matched stars from wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138_astrometric_residuals.png (912 matched stars from wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078_astrometric_residuals.png (912 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079_astrometric_residuals.png (913 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:33:32.88 +11:42:11.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:33:32.88 +11:42:11.0: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20373.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20373_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 20373_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
09:33:32.88 +11:42:11.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:52.006 +14:00:40.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63
Second-epoch image center 09:46:52.006 +14:00:40.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0819 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:52.350 +14:00:38.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:31.742 +14:00:33.63
Second-epoch image center 09:46:52.350 +14:00:38.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0833 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:46:52.006 +14:00:40.09
Second-epoch second image center 09:46:52.350 +14:00:38.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00148 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00148 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ICyxiojvPp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wywIeciErL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LJlsw4FCnH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lt0suH9jI9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 41224 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4723 to 154.9674 deg, Dec +8.5474 to +19.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4723 to 154.9674 deg, Dec 8.5474 to 19.3051 deg
Loaded 4805 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3684 out of 4105 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4105 out of 41224 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.791850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.791850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 41224 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4723 to 154.9674 deg, Dec +8.5474 to +19.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4723 to 154.9674 deg, Dec 8.5474 to 19.3051 deg
Loaded 4805 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3684 out of 4105 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4105 out of 41224 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 42226 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.3858 to 155.2947 deg, Dec +8.1221 to +19.5907 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.3858 to 155.2947 deg, Dec 8.1221 to 19.5907 deg
Loaded 5272 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3734 out of 4128 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4128 out of 42226 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 98 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.0 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ICyxiojvPp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1984, passed=41202
Got 41202 stars (including 39163 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41202 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 904 stars left (next iteration limit 994)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=280 n_q2=223 n_q3=203 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wywIeciErL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1796, passed=42210
Got 42210 stars (including 40354 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42210 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits N_match=911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=204 n_q2=213 n_q3=207 n_q4=287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LJlsw4FCnH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1752, passed=38834
Got 38834 stars (including 37021 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38834 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 910 stars left (next iteration limit 1001)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits N_match=910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.287 n_q1=203 n_q2=221 n_q3=213 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Lt0suH9jI9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=1573, passed=38865
Got 38865 stars (including 37228 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38865 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits N_match=911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=201 n_q2=222 n_q3=212 n_q4=276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.099
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0078.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_225050_TTUQ1b1x1_2871414_rm0MwCTb/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:53:05.24 +15:05:36.3: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:09:47.29 +12:53:37.0: 14.50 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:07:28.46 +11:36:49.6: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:17:39.93 +18:08:04.8: 14.37 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:09:47.29 +12:53:37.0: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:53:05.24 +15:05:36.3: 14.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:07:28.46 +11:36:49.6: 14.40 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:47.29 +12:53:37.0: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5207 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:53:05.24 +15:05:36.3: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4894 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:17:39.93 +18:08:04.8: 14.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:07:28.46 +11:36:49.6: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4903 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:17:39.93 +18:08:04.8: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7242 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:03:09.32 +15:12:52.7: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:48:12.33 +09:24:33.3: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:58:39.28 +10:26:54.5: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:03:09.32 +15:12:52.7: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:48:12.33 +09:24:33.3: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:14:51.08 +15:30:43.7: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:49:10.73 +15:03:08.2: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:58:39.28 +10:26:54.5: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:58:39.28 +10:26:54.5: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5786 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:14:51.08 +15:30:43.7: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:49:10.73 +15:03:08.2: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:18:44.53 +16:13:24.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:06:37.23 +17:54:43.3: 14.34 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:38:30.38 +18:42:57.8: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:18:44.53 +16:13:24.8: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:06:37.23 +17:54:43.3: 14.38 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:06:37.23 +17:54:43.3: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3324 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:15:06.36 +09:07:01.0: 14.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:38:30.38 +18:42:57.8: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:15:06.36 +09:07:01.0: 14.28 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:15:06.36 +09:07:01.0: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2333 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:18:08.74 +16:21:14.4: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:18:08.74 +16:21:14.4: 14.80 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:18:08.74 +16:21:14.4: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6702 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:13:55.66 +12:09:26.8: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:13:55.66 +12:09:26.8: 14.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:13:55.66 +12:09:26.8: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6937 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:08:27.31 +18:08:31.5: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:19:00.35 +14:24:36.3: 15.03 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:08:27.31 +18:08:31.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:11:09.22 +13:42:11.1: 15.16 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:21:39.03 +19:08:28.8: 15.26 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:19:00.35 +14:24:36.3: 14.71 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:19:00.35 +14:24:36.3: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8127 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:11:09.22 +13:42:11.1: 15.28 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:09.22 +13:42:11.1: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7618 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:21:39.03 +19:08:28.8: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:21:39.03 +19:08:28.8: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9082 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:14:53.37 +10:54:27.4: 15.08 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:47:42.68 +18:27:00.5: 14.68 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:15:02.20 +16:18:07.1: 14.87 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:14:53.37 +10:54:27.4: 15.40 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:14:53.37 +10:54:27.4: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7820 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:47:42.68 +18:27:00.5: 15.08 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:47:42.68 +18:27:00.5: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7580 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:15:02.20 +16:18:07.1: 14.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:15:02.20 +16:18:07.1: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8432 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:47:41.59 +17:32:45.6: 14.93 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:02:07.24 +14:58:48.1: 14.77 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:47:41.59 +17:32:45.6: 14.91 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:47:41.59 +17:32:45.6: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9097 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:21:39.75 +14:04:47.7: 14.99 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:02:07.24 +14:58:48.1: 14.67 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:02:07.24 +14:58:48.1: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8101 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:21:39.75 +14:04:47.7: 15.09 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:21:39.75 +14:04:47.7: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7267 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:08:28.66 +10:46:40.5: 15.26 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:08:51.01 +13:07:59.7: 15.44 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:08:28.66 +10:46:40.5: 15.15 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:28.66 +10:46:40.5: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8417 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:22:42.69 +09:56:23.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:08:51.01 +13:07:59.7: 15.41 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:51.01 +13:07:59.7: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8957 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:22:42.69 +09:56:23.8: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:10:48.36 +10:38:08.4: 15.32 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:16:58.62 +09:37:07.1: 14.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:10:48.36 +10:38:08.4: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:48.36 +10:38:08.4: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8787 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:16:58.62 +09:37:07.1: 15.42 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:58.62 +09:37:07.1: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6291 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54851.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54852.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54885.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54905.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55068.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55132.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55228.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55278.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54809_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54809_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54810_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54810_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54812_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54812_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54813_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54813_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54814_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54814_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:26.43 +14:13:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54822_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54822_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54827_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54827_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54828_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54828_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54829_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54829_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:33:32.88 +11:42:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54831_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54831_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54834_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54834_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54836_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54836_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54837_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54837_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54838_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54838_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:51:35.86 +17:28:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54841_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54841_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54843_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54843_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54846_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54846_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54848_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54848_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54851_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 54851_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54852_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 54852_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54854_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54854_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54855_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54855_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:59:33.29 +09:20:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54860_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54860_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54861_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54861_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54866_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54866_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54868_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54868_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54873_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54873_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54878_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54878_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54883_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54883_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54885_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 54885_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54889_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54889_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54890_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54890_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54892_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54892_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:05:35.48 +15:44:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54893_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54893_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54905_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 54905_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54932_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54932_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54945_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54945_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54960_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54960_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54983_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 54983_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55001_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55001_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55019_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55019_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55029_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55029_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55062_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55062_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55068_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 55068_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55089_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55089_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55112_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55112_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55129_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55129_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55132_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 55132_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55133_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55133_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55134_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55134_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55149_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55149_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55174_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55174_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55175_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55175_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55178_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55178_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55179_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55179_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55180_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55180_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55184_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55184_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55186_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55186_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55188_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55188_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55192_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55192_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55194_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55194_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55195_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55195_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55198_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55198_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55200_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55200_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:31:38.01 +18:48:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55201_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55201_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55205_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55205_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55208_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55208_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55210_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55210_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55211_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55211_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55212_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55212_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55213_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55213_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55214_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55214_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55215_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55215_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55217_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55217_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55219_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55219_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55221_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55221_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55224_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55224_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:18:22.94 +13:28:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55225_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55225_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:38:19.50 +17:28:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55228_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 55228_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55234_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55234_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:17:08.24 +10:32:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55240_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55240_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55246_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55246_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55249_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55249_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55252_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55252_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55253_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55253_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55255_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55255_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55257_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55257_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55258_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55258_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55262_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55262_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55263_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55263_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55264_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55264_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55265_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55265_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55271_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55271_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55272_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55272_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55278_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
Preparing report for the candidate 55278_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55284_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55284_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55287_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55287_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55334_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079
The candidate 55334_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-45-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0079 did not pass the final checks
