This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1251 2461179.6251 12.91 06:28:20.56 +72:08:10.4
142.44662 23.98736 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J097.0861+72.1360 | 06:28:20.56 +72:08:10.4 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=1.013+/-0.038 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 06:28:20.56 +72:08:10.4: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 06:28:20.56 +72:08:10.4: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J097.0861+72.1360,2461179.6251,12.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J097.0861+72.1360 20260519.1251 12.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1251 2461179.6251 12.18 04:44:39.14 +68:54:35.1
141.40278 14.90242 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" HL Cam
Type: SR:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.700 V 13.900 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:44:39.14 +68:54:35.1: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:44:39.14 +68:54:35.1: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
HL Cam,2461179.6251,12.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
HL Cam 20260519.1251 12.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
First image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Last image: 2461179.62534223 19.05.2026 03:00:19.569 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 13
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14484
Objects passed selection criteria: 14468
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12960.2
Average stars matched: 12598 (97.2049 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 119156 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 18 22:33:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
First image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Last image: 2461179.62534223 19.05.2026 03:00:19.569 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 87
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 37 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 99832
Objects passed selection criteria: 99597
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 83206
Average stars matched: 80068.5 (96.2292 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1876848 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 18 22:36:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461179.62480415
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Image size: 931.3'x615.5' 15.5(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.84"/pix along the X axis and 5.78"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.84"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.8" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:34.023 +70:00:07.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04
Second-epoch image center 04:48:34.023 +70:00:07.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0778 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:36.642 +70:00:46.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04
Second-epoch image center 04:48:36.642 +70:00:46.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0805 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:48:34.023 +70:00:07.79
Second-epoch second image center 04:48:36.642 +70:00:46.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01145 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1SaggK1hn3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gV8d0Pbecl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1mMoNCssCk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vPlQO39Ghg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.4976 to 99.7245 deg, Dec +63.0575 to +75.4625 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.4976 to 99.7245 deg, Dec 63.0575 to 75.4625 deg
Loaded 13922 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 27 out of 37 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 37 out of 14898 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.850900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.850900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.4976 to 99.7245 deg, Dec +63.0575 to +75.4625 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.4976 to 99.7245 deg, Dec 63.0575 to 75.4625 deg
Loaded 13922 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 27 out of 37 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 37 out of 14898 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 14971 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.8025 to 99.7224 deg, Dec +63.0579 to +75.4657 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.8025 to 99.7224 deg, Dec 63.0579 to 75.4657 deg
Loaded 13849 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 25 out of 34 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 34 out of 14971 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
2.1 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
15.2 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1SaggK1hn3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1217, passed=14898
Got 14898 stars (including 13659 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012935 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010348 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.1 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 287 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 232 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 225 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3429 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.14"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.1 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 344 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.08"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.22"
Excluding outliers - 312 stars left (next iteration limit 247)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=312 sigma_overall_arcsec=9.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=26.200 sigma_q2_arcsec=7.564 sigma_q3_arcsec=24.743 sigma_q4_arcsec=7.958 n_q1=18 n_q2=140 n_q3=16 n_q4=138 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.798
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gV8d0Pbecl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1204, passed=14971
Got 14971 stars (including 13753 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14971 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012933 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010347 (37.2 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.1 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 280 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 218 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 214 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.01"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.1 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 339 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 303 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.96"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 303 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.90"
Excluding outliers - 303 stars left (next iteration limit 235)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=303 sigma_overall_arcsec=8.580 sigma_q1_arcsec=25.777 sigma_q2_arcsec=6.945 sigma_q3_arcsec=22.183 sigma_q4_arcsec=8.516 n_q1=18 n_q2=137 n_q3=17 n_q4=131 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.004
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1mMoNCssCk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=534, passed=11035
Got 11035 stars (including 10490 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11035 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.454 n_q1=251 n_q2=235 n_q3=253 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vPlQO39Ghg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=522, passed=11220
Got 11220 stars (including 10688 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11220 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.404 n_q1=252 n_q2=234 n_q3=257 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.122
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits sigma_overall=9.364 worst_q_ratio=2.798
ref2=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits sigma_overall=8.580 worst_q_ratio=3.004
new1=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.185
new2=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits sigma_overall=0.416 worst_q_ratio=1.122
reference average sigma_overall=8.972 worst_q_ratio=2.901
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257_astrometric_residuals.png (312 matched stars from wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (303 matched stars from wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21042_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 21042_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:28.94 +67:25:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21056_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 21056_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:17.10 +66:08:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21075_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 21075_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:00.49 +71:13:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21194_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 21194_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:16.02 +66:57:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21226_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 21226_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:48.84 +69:31:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21259_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 21259_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:43.71 +64:14:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21301_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 21301_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:53.12 +72:49:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21314_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 21314_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:33.18 +67:33:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00325_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 00325_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:42.30 +75:06:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Image size: 931.3'x615.5' 15.5(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.84"/pix along the X axis and 5.78"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.84"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.8" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:34.023 +70:00:07.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04
Second-epoch image center 04:48:34.023 +70:00:07.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0778 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:36.642 +70:00:46.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04
Second-epoch image center 04:48:36.642 +70:00:46.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0805 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:48:34.023 +70:00:07.79
Second-epoch second image center 04:48:36.642 +70:00:46.77
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01145 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4gbNl9Y7Lw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nm4goFopeT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4IG40KpFYb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JIWl2Hd8Py
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 107757 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.4945 to 99.7245 deg, Dec +63.0040 to +75.4780 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.4945 to 99.7245 deg, Dec 63.0040 to 75.4780 deg
Loaded 14035 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 37 out of 59 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 59 out of 107757 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.614600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.614600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 107757 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.4945 to 99.7245 deg, Dec +63.0040 to +75.4780 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.4945 to 99.7245 deg, Dec 63.0040 to 75.4780 deg
Loaded 14035 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 37 out of 59 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 59 out of 107757 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 108260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.4942 to 99.8836 deg, Dec +63.0104 to +75.4891 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.4942 to 99.8836 deg, Dec 63.0104 to 75.4891 deg
Loaded 14072 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 37 out of 57 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 57 out of 108260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 75 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
1.9 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
3.1 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
3.1 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
15.3 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4gbNl9Y7Lw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=48, blended=8978, passed=107709
Got 107709 stars (including 98551 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 107709 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012935 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010348 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.0 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 296 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 243 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.73"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 236 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21272 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.21"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 63.0 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 348 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 320 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.20"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 319 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32121 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.81"
Excluding outliers - 319 stars left (next iteration limit 259)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=319 sigma_overall_arcsec=8.666 sigma_q1_arcsec=19.275 sigma_q2_arcsec=6.823 sigma_q3_arcsec=23.141 sigma_q4_arcsec=7.694 n_q1=18 n_q2=142 n_q3=19 n_q4=140 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.670
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nm4goFopeT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=8926, passed=108230
Got 108230 stars (including 99122 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 108230 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012933 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010347 (37.2 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.0 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 293 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 240 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.07"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 233 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.99"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.0 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 350 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 317 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.96"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 317 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30524 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.71"
Excluding outliers - 317 stars left (next iteration limit 256)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=317 sigma_overall_arcsec=8.473 sigma_q1_arcsec=17.933 sigma_q2_arcsec=6.890 sigma_q3_arcsec=22.563 sigma_q4_arcsec=8.233 n_q1=17 n_q2=141 n_q3=18 n_q4=141 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.663
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4IG40KpFYb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=3160, passed=58802
Got 58802 stars (including 55566 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58802 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57699 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57699 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=253 n_q2=221 n_q3=269 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.218
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JIWl2Hd8Py (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=3348, passed=60168
Got 60168 stars (including 56761 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60168 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.418 n_q1=257 n_q2=223 n_q3=264 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.061
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-59-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0036.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_223055_TTUQ1b1x1_2074739_JkXidXL1/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 03:25:25.83 +72:36:18.0: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 03:45:58.60 +68:00:23.7: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 03:45:58.60 +68:00:23.7: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 03:25:25.83 +72:36:18.0: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:58.60 +68:00:23.7: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5250 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 03:45:35.74 +70:50:13.1: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:06:11.27 +72:02:26.6: 14.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 03:45:35.74 +70:50:13.1: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:35.74 +70:50:13.1: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1244 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 05:36:34.88 +69:09:22.1: 14.55 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:06:11.27 +72:02:26.6: 14.21 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:11.27 +72:02:26.6: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4104 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 05:36:34.88 +69:09:22.1: 14.43 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:36:34.88 +69:09:22.1: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.6960 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 06:28:20.56 +72:08:10.4: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 06:28:20.56 +72:08:10.4: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:44:39.14 +68:54:35.1: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:44:39.14 +68:54:35.1: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out127548.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04403.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78880.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127548_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 127548_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:25:25.83 +72:36:18.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.00, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.98)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127558_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 127558_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:28.11 +67:15:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127564_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 127564_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127575_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 127575_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:20.41 +64:57:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127664_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 127664_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:17.12 +66:08:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127815_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 127815_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:16.03 +66:57:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127879_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 127879_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:19.83 +66:10:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128031_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128031_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:33.75 +68:12:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128136_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128136_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:20.56 +72:25:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128137_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128137_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:50.69 +66:22:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128139_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128139_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:07.84 +66:49:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128233_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128233_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:41.52 +66:36:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128264_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128264_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:45.38 +70:46:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128300_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128300_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:40.94 +72:09:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128315_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128315_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:31.25 +69:21:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128349_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128349_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:14.58 +69:04:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128356_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128356_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:40.86 +74:39:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128399_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128399_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:54.07 +67:29:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128474_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128474_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:58.06 +72:49:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128564_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128564_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:48.10 +71:16:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128654_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128654_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:08.86 +69:34:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128676_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128676_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:38.01 +70:38:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128692_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128692_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:30.05 +68:00:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128697_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128697_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128703_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128703_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:27.37 +66:37:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128708_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128708_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:34.60 +66:16:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128744_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128744_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:21.76 +67:27:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128794_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128794_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:53.85 +67:02:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128828_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128828_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:27.35 +67:59:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128850_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128850_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:35.32 +67:04:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128891_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128891_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:03.54 +70:19:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128896_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128896_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128902_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128902_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:45.31 +67:00:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128937_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128937_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:39.53 +68:29:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128947_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128947_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:22.16 +70:17:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128983_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 128983_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:21.30 +68:15:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129028_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 129028_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:35.61 +68:00:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129089_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 129089_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:16.38 +74:37:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129097_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 129097_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:14.73 +74:39:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129210_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 129210_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129290_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 129290_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:21.33 +66:31:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129308_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 129308_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:09.93 +73:40:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129311_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 129311_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:41.05 +70:26:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129334_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 129334_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:46.85 +73:38:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129347_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 129347_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:51.55 +69:39:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129362_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 129362_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:19.32 +69:15:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129371_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 129371_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:02.14 +71:52:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129488_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 129488_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:43.29 +66:47:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129509_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 129509_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:03.61 +66:43:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129588_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 129588_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:15.59 +73:34:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129611_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 129611_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:30.91 +70:19:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129654_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 129654_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:30.21 +71:07:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129687_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 129687_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:31.37 +72:51:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129694_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 129694_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:54.79 +69:27:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129701_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 129701_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:22.51 +72:53:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12652_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 12652_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:39.76 +73:48:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04403_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
Preparing report for the candidate 04403_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68076_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 68076_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89877_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 89877_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:36.64 +66:45:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42165_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 42165_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:00.41 +71:13:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61564_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 61564_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:26.39 +69:27:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78461_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 78461_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:43.32 +68:46:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91228_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 91228_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:16.79 +66:34:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55414_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 55414_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:33.20 +67:33:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27106_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 27106_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:08.63 +71:22:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01239_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 01239_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:42.20 +75:06:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99082_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 99082_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:39.25 +66:55:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50086_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 50086_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:20.24 +69:51:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71275_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 71275_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:43.72 +64:14:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75888_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 75888_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:28.95 +67:25:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78647_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 78647_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:09.54 +68:45:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75269_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 75269_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:32.60 +68:35:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78880_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
Preparing report for the candidate 78880_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98298_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 98298_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:40.78 +67:24:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59921_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037
The candidate 59921_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_22-00-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0037 did not pass the final checks