This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1168 2461179.6168 13.14 07:11:41.57 +26:43:43.6
190.66139 15.97671 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.42 Isis 2 -0 2 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:11:41.57 +26:43:43.6: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:11:41.57 +26:43:43.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.6168,13.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.1168 13.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1168 2461179.6168 13.46 07:22:40.21 +31:16:27.5
187.14645 19.88039 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.98 Ianthe 1 -1 1 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:22:40.21 +31:16:27.5: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:22:40.21 +31:16:27.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461179.6168,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260519.1168 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 19.1168 2461179.6168 10.49 06:26:14.22 +29:07:06.3
184.16113 7.84923 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" NSVS J0626140+290705
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.986 R1 Y 0.547 R1 350.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:26:14.22 +29:07:06.3: 11.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:26:14.22 +29:07:06.3: 11.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.45 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0626140+290705,2461179.6168,10.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0626140+290705 20260519.1168 10.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461179.61705782 19.05.2026 02:48:23.796 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22980
Objects passed selection criteria: 22890
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16740
Average stars matched: 16269.5 (97.1894 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 126700 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 18 22:01:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461179.61705782 19.05.2026 02:48:23.796 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 76
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 26 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 153675
Objects passed selection criteria: 153307
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 109329
Average stars matched: 105031 (96.0683 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2839540 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon May 18 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-60-gf8f75ec6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-18)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 18 22:04:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461179.61655355
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:08.969 +29:59:56.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:08.969 +29:59:56.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0313 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:08.533 +30:00:27.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:08.533 +30:00:27.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0319 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:08.969 +29:59:56.76
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:08.533 +30:00:27.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00867 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6P2GJFtgTi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hIWOSqssqb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gx4vi5ML4S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7DJkIaauj4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10842 out of 11962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11962 out of 24243 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.910050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.910050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10842 out of 11962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11962 out of 24243 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2309 to 114.2881 deg, Dec +24.1931 to +35.3694 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2309 to 114.2881 deg, Dec 24.1931 to 35.3694 deg
Loaded 15192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10819 out of 11947 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11947 out of 24037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
3.7 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
3.7 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.6P2GJFtgTi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2293, passed=24243
Got 24243 stars (including 21925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.349 n_q1=224 n_q2=254 n_q3=246 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hIWOSqssqb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2282, passed=24037
Got 24037 stars (including 21723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=224 n_q2=252 n_q3=245 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gx4vi5ML4S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=490, passed=9408
Got 9408 stars (including 8914 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9408 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9232 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.481 n_q1=222 n_q2=252 n_q3=232 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7DJkIaauj4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=491, passed=9693
Got 9693 stars (including 9193 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9693 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9502 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.478 n_q1=221 n_q2=257 n_q3=230 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.249
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits sigma_overall=0.401 worst_q_ratio=1.184
ref2=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.192
new1=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits sigma_overall=0.477 worst_q_ratio=1.242
new2=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits sigma_overall=0.480 worst_q_ratio=1.249
reference average sigma_overall=0.391 worst_q_ratio=1.188
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227_astrometric_residuals.png (942 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020_astrometric_residuals.png (932 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021_astrometric_residuals.png (936 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31404_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 31404_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:36.96 +31:52:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31405_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 31405_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.45 +31:35:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31585_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 31585_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:51.94 +31:52:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31607_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 31607_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:40.93 +27:59:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31614_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 31614_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:03.55 +30:13:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31628_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 31628_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:42.69 +30:33:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.29 +33:22:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 08118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:40.67 +27:36:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.12 +30:16:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.23 +27:57:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:08.969 +29:59:56.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:08.969 +29:59:56.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0313 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.3'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:08.533 +30:00:27.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:08.533 +30:00:27.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0319 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:08.969 +29:59:56.76
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:08.533 +30:00:27.44
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00867 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1Akf6S0cST
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y5lfVapFD2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dYFYq6CL7V
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lxpMMeUtPj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec +24.1448 to +35.3665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec 24.1448 to 35.3665 deg
Loaded 15341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8753 out of 12230 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12230 out of 167542 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.776200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.776200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec +24.1448 to +35.3665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec 24.1448 to 35.3665 deg
Loaded 15341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8753 out of 12230 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12230 out of 167542 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 166985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2108 to 114.3113 deg, Dec +24.1637 to +35.3763 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2108 to 114.3113 deg, Dec 24.1637 to 35.3763 deg
Loaded 15283 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8658 out of 12221 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12221 out of 166985 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 73 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
3.4 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
3.4 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1Akf6S0cST (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=53, blended=20873, passed=167489
Got 167489 stars (including 146338 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167489 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=226 n_q2=249 n_q3=235 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Y5lfVapFD2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20907, passed=166934
Got 166934 stars (including 145740 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 166934 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=222 n_q2=245 n_q3=237 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.195
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dYFYq6CL7V (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2589, passed=51936
Got 51936 stars (including 49304 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51936 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.612 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.498 n_q1=216 n_q2=255 n_q3=241 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lxpMMeUtPj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2627, passed=53434
Got 53434 stars (including 50764 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53434 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52549 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52549 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=222 n_q2=256 n_q3=242 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-47-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0020.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_215859_TTUQ1b1x1_1486945_S6V9KTQ6/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:30:59.38 +26:17:59.7: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:30:59.38 +26:17:59.7: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:59.38 +26:17:59.7: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5796 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:35:23.16 +32:12:18.3: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:21:40.02 +25:50:51.6: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:35:23.16 +32:12:18.3: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:23.16 +32:12:18.3: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8068 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:12:43.21 +25:31:53.8: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:09:13.49 +30:08:40.8: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:37:03.74 +32:44:39.3: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:21:40.02 +25:50:51.6: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:40.02 +25:50:51.6: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9391 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:11:41.57 +26:43:43.6: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:12:43.21 +25:31:53.8: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:09:13.49 +30:08:40.8: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:43.21 +25:31:53.8: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0312 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:13.49 +30:08:40.8: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0097 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:37:03.74 +32:44:39.3: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:03.74 +32:44:39.3: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9678 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:22:40.21 +31:16:27.5: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:11:41.57 +26:43:43.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:22:40.21 +31:16:27.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:26:14.22 +29:07:06.3: 11.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:26:14.22 +29:07:06.3: 11.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.45 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:26:14.22 +29:07:06.3: ref_mag=11.45 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4922 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193856.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out194159.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out85332.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192058_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 192058_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192062_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 192062_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:32.87 +31:01:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192072_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 192072_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:31.01 +28:48:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192098_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 192098_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:36.95 +31:52:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192160_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 192160_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:20.61 +24:47:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192330_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 192330_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:42.17 +27:55:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192559_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 192559_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:54.59 +27:49:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192850_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 192850_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:18.77 +29:41:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192915_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 192915_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:43.88 +29:29:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192999_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 192999_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:39.20 +27:38:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193025_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193025_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:16.88 +28:00:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193035_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193035_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:11.01 +29:45:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193065_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193065_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:34.11 +28:18:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193213_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193213_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:28.00 +31:40:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193227_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193227_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:39.06 +27:46:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193238_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193238_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:05.38 +28:00:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193240_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193240_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.57 +32:29:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193261_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193261_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:20.49 +26:22:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193271_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193271_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:00.61 +29:47:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193274_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193274_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193277_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193277_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:22.58 +25:23:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193355_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193355_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:06.62 +29:16:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193364_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193364_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.28 +26:03:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193378_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193378_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.78 +25:33:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193394_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193394_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:00.45 +27:03:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193398_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193398_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:36.53 +25:30:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193400_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193400_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:27.21 +25:34:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193408_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193408_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:51.10 +32:48:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193412_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193412_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193449_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193449_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:52.91 +33:40:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193456_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193456_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:04.85 +27:12:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193491_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193491_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:15.66 +27:12:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193541_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193541_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:12.53 +30:33:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193576_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193576_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:47.88 +25:27:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:16.61 +26:58:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193619_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193619_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:13.34 +26:25:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193633_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193633_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193635_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193635_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193638_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193638_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:06.28 +25:37:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193702_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193702_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:49.34 +32:38:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193735_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193735_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193764_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193764_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.20 +32:21:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193777_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193777_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:49.45 +33:53:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193806_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193806_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:46.91 +34:14:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193856_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 193856_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193869_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193869_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:52.46 +28:23:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193895_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193895_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:47.22 +27:58:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193902_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193902_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:31.41 +29:02:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193961_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 193961_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:31.44 +30:38:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194126_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 194126_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:02.93 +29:43:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194136_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 194136_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:25.86 +31:14:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194159_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 194159_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178285_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 178285_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:15.98 +29:41:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 108118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:42.68 +30:33:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80230_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 80230_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:14.24 +29:06:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121816_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 121816_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:32.72 +33:21:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.24 +27:57:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36451_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 36451_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:47.97 +26:59:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104221_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 104221_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:42.62 +30:34:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156398_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 156398_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:10.25 +34:19:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67957_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 67957_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:12.75 +28:30:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25119_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 25119_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:48.65 +25:58:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130557_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 130557_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:36.83 +32:44:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55671_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 55671_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:40.68 +27:36:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.12 +30:16:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.45 +31:35:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:12.42 +26:47:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56485_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 56485_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.60 +27:29:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104378_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 104378_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:09.24 +30:22:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114325_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 114325_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:01.59 +31:18:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46991_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 46991_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:28.63 +27:25:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021
The candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_21-48-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0021 did not pass the final checks