This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2488 2461178.7488 13.79 14:37:40.80 -01:48:10.1
348.66313 51.38176 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 3.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1278 Kenya 4 1 4 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:37:40.80 -01:48:10.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:37:40.80 -01:48:10.1: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.2488* 14 37 40.80 -01 48 10.1 13.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.7488,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.2488 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2488 2461178.7488 14.32 14:29:54.12 -05:05:16.3
343.08151 49.94968 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 3.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1107 Lictoria 1 -2 2 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:29:54.12 -05:05:16.3: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:29:54.12 -05:05:16.3: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.2488* 14 29 54.12 -05 05 16.3 14.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.7488,14.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.2488 14.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2488 2461178.7488 14.47 14:49:13.69 +01:17:41.9
355.45273 51.73123 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 3.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1926 Demiddelaer 1 -1 1 14.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:49:13.69 +01:17:41.9: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:49:13.69 +01:17:41.9: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.2488* 14 49 13.69 +01 17 41.9 14.5 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.7488,14.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.2488 14.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2488 2461178.7488 14.57 14:43:54.66 -02:38:23.0
349.69152 49.73960 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 3.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.598 Octavia 2 -1 3 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:43:54.66 -02:38:23.0: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:43:54.66 -02:38:23.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 18.2488* 14 43 54.66 -02 38 23.0 14.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.7488,14.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.2488 14.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
First image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Last image: 2461178.74905465 18.05.2026 05:58:28.322 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4963
Objects passed selection criteria: 4962
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4900
Average stars matched: 4800.75 (97.9745 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111552 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 18 01:07:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
First image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Last image: 2461178.74905465 18.05.2026 05:58:28.322 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 79
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 31184
Objects passed selection criteria: 31143
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 30521.2
Average stars matched: 29658 (97.1716 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 135856 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 18 01:09:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461178.74861462
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:07.799 -02:02:27.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:07.799 -02:02:27.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0754 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:08.992 -02:02:20.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:08.992 -02:02:20.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0701 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:07.799 -02:02:27.07
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:08.992 -02:02:20.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00533 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8RtJJwGONT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits &> /tmp/tmp.52VHGaxNXe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1NPFaU9cTl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JtHVCrpS8Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to +3.7684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to 3.7684 deg
Loaded 4534 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3368 out of 3527 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3527 out of 6865 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.858600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.858600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to +3.7684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to 3.7684 deg
Loaded 4534 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3368 out of 3527 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3527 out of 6865 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 6283 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.6881 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3215 to +3.3059 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.6881 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3215 to 3.3059 deg
Loaded 4006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3333 out of 3439 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3439 out of 6283 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.3 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
15.0 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8RtJJwGONT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, passed=6865
Got 6865 stars (including 6349 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=272 n_q2=182 n_q3=211 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.52VHGaxNXe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=429, passed=6283
Got 6283 stars (including 5846 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6283 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.593 n_q1=261 n_q2=207 n_q3=204 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.399
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1NPFaU9cTl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=335, passed=5974
Got 5974 stars (including 5634 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5974 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.529 n_q1=259 n_q2=202 n_q3=201 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.292
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JtHVCrpS8Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=305, passed=5880
Got 5880 stars (including 5572 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5880 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.512 n_q1=262 n_q2=201 n_q3=202 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.396
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.118
ref2=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits sigma_overall=0.424 worst_q_ratio=1.399
new1=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits sigma_overall=0.413 worst_q_ratio=1.292
new2=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits sigma_overall=0.368 worst_q_ratio=1.396
reference average sigma_overall=0.3795 worst_q_ratio=1.2585
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267_astrometric_residuals.png (935 matched stars from wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574_astrometric_residuals.png (930 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575_astrometric_residuals.png (931 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:34:29.88 -00:24:09.1: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:34:29.88 -00:24:09.1: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:29.88 -00:24:09.1: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2629 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20336_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 20336_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:07.799 -02:02:27.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:07.799 -02:02:27.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0754 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:08.992 -02:02:20.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:08.992 -02:02:20.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0701 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:07.799 -02:02:27.07
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:08.992 -02:02:20.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00533 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lmCMUd2RfF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1mEYAGY0p8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MrHW6GFQJS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VZeYo1s16Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to +3.7692 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to 3.7692 deg
Loaded 4538 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3208 out of 3567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3567 out of 43198 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.715350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.715350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to +3.7692 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to 3.7692 deg
Loaded 4538 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3208 out of 3567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3567 out of 43198 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 36035 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.6882 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3235 to +3.3190 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.6882 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3235 to 3.3190 deg
Loaded 4013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3249 out of 3501 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3501 out of 36035 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 60 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.2 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
15.2 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lmCMUd2RfF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1997, passed=43174
Got 43174 stars (including 41107 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43174 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=266 n_q2=181 n_q3=215 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1mEYAGY0p8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1833, passed=36031
Got 36031 stars (including 34149 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36031 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.619 n_q1=275 n_q2=191 n_q3=213 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.475
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MrHW6GFQJS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1624, passed=34327
Got 34327 stars (including 32659 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34327 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33711 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1018)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits N_match=926 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=274 n_q2=193 n_q3=210 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.406
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VZeYo1s16Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1481, passed=33312
Got 33312 stars (including 31792 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33312 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32757 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits N_match=924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.506 n_q1=278 n_q2=192 n_q3=206 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.485
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-57-50_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1574.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_010143_TTUQ2b1x1_541846_mVp0Aazy/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:20.51 -04:42:26.7: 14.52 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:33:59.71 +00:01:02.9: 14.49 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:30:07.02 -04:14:06.5: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:17:18.08 -00:36:04.5: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:55:03.00 +02:02:18.8: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:52:54.54 +00:59:43.8: 14.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:55:03.00 +02:02:18.8: 14.08 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:03.00 +02:02:18.8: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1271 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:00:20.51 -04:42:26.7: 14.72 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:33:59.71 +00:01:02.9: 14.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:17:18.08 -00:36:04.5: 14.14 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:30:07.02 -04:14:06.5: 14.21 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:20.51 -04:42:26.7: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4804 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:33:59.71 +00:01:02.9: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5635 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:17:18.08 -00:36:04.5: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4067 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:52:54.54 +00:59:43.8: 14.61 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:30:07.02 -04:14:06.5: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3187 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:54.54 +00:59:43.8: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5707 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:37:40.80 -01:48:10.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:50:14.70 -03:53:04.7: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:29:54.12 -05:05:16.3: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:43.24 -02:20:37.8: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:37:40.80 -01:48:10.1: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:50:14.70 -03:53:04.7: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:14.70 -03:53:04.7: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8083 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:54:10.71 -02:49:17.1: 14.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:50.05 -05:02:18.7: 14.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:22.32 -02:59:14.0: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:43:54.66 -02:38:23.0: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:49:13.69 +01:17:41.9: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:29:54.12 -05:05:16.3: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:43.24 -02:20:37.8: 14.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:43.24 -02:20:37.8: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4053 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:49:11.59 -04:16:55.4: 14.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:54:10.71 -02:49:17.1: 14.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:00:50.05 -05:02:18.7: 15.05 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:10.71 -02:49:17.1: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7732 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:50.05 -05:02:18.7: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5245 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:22.32 -02:59:14.0: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:43:54.66 -02:38:23.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:49:13.69 +01:17:41.9: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:46:41.56 +00:36:27.1: 15.18 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:49:11.59 -04:16:55.4: 15.07 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:11.59 -04:16:55.4: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7477 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:48.86 +01:31:20.1: 15.13 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:48:31.03 -01:51:24.2: 15.30 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:46:41.56 +00:36:27.1: 15.11 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:48:22.36 -04:46:56.8: 15.02 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:46:41.56 +00:36:27.1: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7673 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:48.86 +01:31:20.1: 14.89 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:48.86 +01:31:20.1: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6160 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:40:57.56 -05:37:35.5: 15.39 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:48:31.03 -01:51:24.2: 15.12 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:48:22.36 -04:46:56.8: 15.46 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:31.03 -01:51:24.2: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6667 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:22.36 -04:46:56.8: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7008 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:59.25 -04:57:09.1: 14.97 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:40:57.56 -05:37:35.5: 15.30 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:40:57.56 -05:37:35.5: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7568 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:12.68 -01:16:22.5: 14.76 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:53.86 -00:44:02.9: 15.12 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:59.25 -04:57:09.1: 14.99 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:59.25 -04:57:09.1: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7845 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:51:27.25 -05:41:19.9: 15.08 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:12.68 -01:16:22.5: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:12.68 -01:16:22.5: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7219 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:50:43.96 -01:45:43.0: 15.70 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:53.86 -00:44:02.9: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:53.86 -00:44:02.9: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8252 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:53:18.66 -00:50:03.6: 15.89 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:51:27.25 -05:41:19.9: 14.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:27.25 -05:41:19.9: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6833 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:50:43.96 -01:45:43.0: 15.30 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:43.96 -01:45:43.0: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.7896 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:53.53 -02:28:46.7: 15.14 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:49:01.25 +00:54:04.9: 15.16 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:53:18.66 -00:50:03.6: 15.34 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.53 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:18.66 -00:50:03.6: ref_mag=15.53 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.8782 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:45:44.86 +01:51:44.5: 15.34 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:53.53 -02:28:46.7: 15.16 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:21.06 -02:12:25.9: 15.18 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:53.53 -02:28:46.7: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8553 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:49:01.25 +00:54:04.9: 15.33 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:01.25 +00:54:04.9: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7866 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:54.17 -00:38:17.7: 14.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:45:44.86 +01:51:44.5: 15.18 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:45:44.86 +01:51:44.5: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8703 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:46:10.42 -00:48:00.0: 14.91 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:21.06 -02:12:25.9: 15.38 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:21.06 -02:12:25.9: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8693 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:54.17 -00:38:17.7: 14.91 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:54.17 -00:38:17.7: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5355 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:44:22.81 -05:29:45.0: 14.84 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:46:10.42 -00:48:00.0: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:46:10.42 -00:48:00.0: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8294 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:37.58 -02:49:12.4: 14.91 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:52.23 -03:30:28.9: 15.20 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:44:22.81 -05:29:45.0: 14.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:22.81 -05:29:45.0: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8563 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:16:21.61 -03:10:27.4: 14.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:37.58 -02:49:12.4: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:37.58 -02:49:12.4: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7995 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:53:38.73 +01:24:43.5: 15.41 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:52.23 -03:30:28.9: 14.89 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:52.23 -03:30:28.9: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7150 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:16:21.61 -03:10:27.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:16.74 +00:42:56.9: 15.18 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:16:21.61 -03:10:27.4: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8389 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:53:38.73 +01:24:43.5: 15.05 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:38.73 +01:24:43.5: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8162 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:27:12.43 -01:20:55.8: 14.91 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:00:16.74 +00:42:56.9: 14.90 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:06.12 -00:26:13.0: 15.25 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:16.74 +00:42:56.9: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7243 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:47:54.29 -05:03:21.1: 15.32 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:27:12.43 -01:20:55.8: 14.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:27:12.43 -01:20:55.8: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8432 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:06.12 -00:26:13.0: 14.72 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:06.12 -00:26:13.0: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8929 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:47:54.29 -05:03:21.1: 15.13 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:47:54.29 -05:03:21.1: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9669 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52616.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52491.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52563.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52567.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52593.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52399_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52399_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52402_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52402_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52405_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52405_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52406_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52406_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52408_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52408_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52410_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52410_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:35:21.25 -03:07:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52414_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52414_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52415_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52415_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:00:51.24 -04:32:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52419_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52419_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:22:28.63 +00:49:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52420_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52420_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:41:46.78 -05:16:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52424_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52424_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52425_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52425_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52440_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52440_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52444_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52444_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52459_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52459_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52462_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52462_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:06.29 -04:19:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52479_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52479_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52483_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52483_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:41:52.59 -03:30:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52491_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
Preparing report for the candidate 52491_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52507_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52507_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52508_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52508_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:52:52.66 -01:12:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52512_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52512_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52563_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
Preparing report for the candidate 52563_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52566_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52566_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52567_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
Preparing report for the candidate 52567_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52588_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52588_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52593_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
Preparing report for the candidate 52593_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52601_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52601_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52616_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52616_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:58:22.32 -02:59:14.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.788 6339329711231925888 224.59252215537 -02.98708490592 15.0534 14.5951 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.788#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52619_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52619_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52630_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52630_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52640_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52640_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52641_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52641_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52651_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52651_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52658_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52658_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52661_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52661_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52663_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52663_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52670_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52670_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52671_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52671_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52673_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52673_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52674_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52674_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52683_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52683_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:29:42.24 -02:27:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52688_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52688_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52691_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52691_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52696_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52696_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:47:55.91 +01:43:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52699_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52699_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52709_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52709_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52710_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52710_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52720_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52720_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52725_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52725_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52732_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52732_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52736_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52736_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52750_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52750_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52757_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52757_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52759_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52759_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52768_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52768_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52770_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52770_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52772_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52772_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52782_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52782_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52830_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575
The candidate 52830_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_00-58-28_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1575 did not pass the final checks