This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2318 2461178.7318 11.65 15:19:24.80 -38:30:33.4
332.22989 15.80225 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.1" and 8.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 6006927520593304192 | 15:19:23.45 -38:30:15.5 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:19:24.80 -38:30:33.4: 13.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:19:24.80 -38:30:33.4: 13.71 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 6006927520593304192,2461178.7318,11.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 6006927520593304192 20260518.2318 11.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2318 2461178.7318 12.54 15:07:46.49 -36:42:41.9
331.22011 18.56127 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" SSS_J150746.1-364242
Type: LPV
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.590 CV Y 3.270 CV 739.098300000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:07:46.49 -36:42:41.9: 13.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:07:46.49 -36:42:41.9: 14.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.17
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
SSS_J150746.1-364242,2461178.7318,12.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
SSS_J150746.1-364242 20260518.2318 12.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2318 2461178.7318 11.12 15:54:40.02 -36:45:29.5
339.04892 12.95327 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J155440-3645.5
Type: MISC|SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.850 V Y 0.370 V 2452041.10000 85.275726000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:54:40.02 -36:45:29.5: 12.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:54:40.02 -36:45:29.5: 12.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J155440-3645.5,2461178.7318,11.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J155440-3645.5 20260518.2318 11.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2318 2461178.7318 11.36 15:06:53.30 -37:23:33.1
330.68566 18.07396 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ASAS J150653-3723.6
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.090 V Y 2.790 CV 2452355.60000 246.184145500000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:06:53.30 -37:23:33.1: 13.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:06:53.30 -37:23:33.1: 14.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.16
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J150653-3723.6,2461178.7318,11.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J150653-3723.6 20260518.2318 11.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2318 2461178.7318 10.85 15:36:25.63 -37:07:32.5
335.89813 14.96986 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J153626-3707.5
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.398 Ic Y 0.821 Ic 2453926.50000 928.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:36:25.63 -37:07:32.5: 11.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:36:25.63 -37:07:32.5: 12.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J153626-3707.5,2461178.7318,10.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J153626-3707.5 20260518.2318 10.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2318 2461178.7318 12.50 15:39:33.37 -36:00:08.2
337.12616 15.47254 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 7" ASASSN-V J153932.78-360007.7
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.780 V 14.180 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:39:33.37 -36:00:08.2: 13.54 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:39:33.37 -36:00:08.2: 13.97 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J153932.78-360007.7,2461178.7318,12.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J153932.78-360007.7 20260518.2318 12.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2318 2461178.7318 12.13 15:36:42.26 -34:40:31.1
337.50048 16.87604 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J153642.30-344029.3
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.540 V 13.930 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:36:42.26 -34:40:31.1: 13.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:36:42.26 -34:40:31.1: 13.24 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J153642.30-344029.3,2461178.7318,12.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J153642.30-344029.3 20260518.2318 12.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2318 2461178.7318 10.85 15:24:14.10 -38:44:37.5
332.90009 15.07806 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J152414-3844.7
Type: MISC|SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.630 V Y 0.630 V 2452029.10000 74.207817000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:24:14.10 -38:44:37.5: 11.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:24:14.10 -38:44:37.5: 12.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J152414-3844.7,2461178.7318,10.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J152414-3844.7 20260518.2318 10.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2318 2461178.7318 12.12 15:51:24.10 -32:51:16.1
341.16894 16.34183 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 8.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" FP Lup
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.900 V 15.100 V 2453537.00000 292.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:51:24.10 -32:51:16.1: 13.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:51:24.10 -32:51:16.1: 13.10 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
FP Lup,2461178.7318,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
FP Lup 20260518.2318 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2318 2461178.7318 12.09 15:55:42.16 -35:05:38.7
340.33707 14.06885 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J155542.25-350535.9
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.120 V 13.570 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:55:42.16 -35:05:38.7: 13.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:55:42.16 -35:05:38.7: 13.14 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J155542.25-350535.9,2461178.7318,12.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J155542.25-350535.9 20260518.2318 12.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2318 2461178.7318 11.41 15:38:41.59 -30:32:37.5
340.55538 19.84952 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J153841-3032.6
Type: MISC|SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.200 V Y 0.560 V 2452100.70000 71.957237000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:38:41.59 -30:32:37.5: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:38:41.59 -30:32:37.5: 12.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J153841-3032.6,2461178.7318,11.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J153841-3032.6 20260518.2318 11.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2318 2461178.7318 11.63 16:09:07.88 -37:06:32.6
340.99626 10.75211 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" ASAS J160908-3706.6
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.933 Ic Y 0.282 Ic 2452660.40000 174.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:09:07.88 -37:06:32.6: 12.74 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:09:07.88 -37:06:32.6: 12.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J160908-3706.6,2461178.7318,11.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J160908-3706.6 20260518.2318 11.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2318 2461178.7318 11.77 15:28:47.14 -33:16:28.7
337.01814 18.98462 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J152847.15-331627.0
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.760 V 13.220 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:28:47.14 -33:16:28.7: 12.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:28:47.14 -33:16:28.7: 12.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J152847.15-331627.0,2461178.7318,11.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J152847.15-331627.0 20260518.2318 11.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2318 2461178.7318 11.33 15:13:12.08 -31:14:00.6
335.40334 22.55395 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J151312-3114.0
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.740 V Y 1.080 V 2452350.60000 240.725418000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:13:12.08 -31:14:00.6: 12.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:13:12.08 -31:14:00.6: 12.80 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J151312-3114.0,2461178.7318,11.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J151312-3114.0 20260518.2318 11.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2318 2461178.7318 11.71 15:36:54.56 -30:10:45.9
340.48096 20.37480 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J153655-3010.8
Type: MISC|SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.860 V Y 0.650 V 2452144.20000 100.128738000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:36:54.56 -30:10:45.9: 12.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:36:54.56 -30:10:45.9: 12.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J153655-3010.8,2461178.7318,11.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J153655-3010.8 20260518.2318 11.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2318 2461178.7318 11.37 15:16:41.82 -37:40:05.1
332.25128 16.79867 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 7.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASAS J151642-3740.0
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.156 Ic Y 0.646 Ic 2452898.80000 262.900000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:16:41.82 -37:40:05.1: 12.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:16:41.82 -37:40:05.1: 12.68 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J151642-3740.0,2461178.7318,11.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J151642-3740.0 20260518.2318 11.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2318 2461178.7318 12.00 16:06:46.49 -36:27:50.9
341.09722 11.54502 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ASAS J160647-3627.8
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.200 V Y 0.710 V 2452125.70000 65.460739000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:06:46.49 -36:27:50.9: 12.99 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:06:46.49 -36:27:50.9: 12.90 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J160647-3627.8,2461178.7318,12.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J160647-3627.8 20260518.2318 12.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2318 2461178.7318 10.45 15:53:49.94 -34:50:28.3
340.21151 14.51153 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J155350-3450.4
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.620 V Y 0.590 V 2452331.30000 144.997589000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:53:49.94 -34:50:28.3: 11.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:53:49.94 -34:50:28.3: 11.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.51 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J155350-3450.4,2461178.7318,10.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J155350-3450.4 20260518.2318 10.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2318 2461178.7318 11.01 15:40:17.07 -38:00:39.4
335.96355 13.80202 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J154017-3800.7
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.640 V Y 0.660 V 2452120.00000 110.288322000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:40:17.07 -38:00:39.4: 11.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:40:17.07 -38:00:39.4: 12.22 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J154017-3800.7,2461178.7318,11.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J154017-3800.7 20260518.2318 11.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2318 2461178.7318 11.88 15:33:57.02 -38:36:42.0
334.57035 14.07827 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J153356.97-383642.0
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.400 V 13.730 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:33:57.02 -38:36:42.0: 12.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:33:57.02 -38:36:42.0: 13.07 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J153356.97-383642.0,2461178.7318,11.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J153356.97-383642.0 20260518.2318 11.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2318 2461178.7318 9.85 15:35:34.51 -35:04:59.3
337.04848 16.69524 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J153534-3505.0
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.360 V Y 0.390 V 2452275.10000 107.372940000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:35:34.51 -35:04:59.3: 10.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:35:34.51 -35:04:59.3: 11.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.88 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J153534-3505.0,2461178.7318,9.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J153534-3505.0 20260518.2318 9.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 18.2318 2461178.7318 11.30 15:36:09.18 -37:57:52.9
335.32784 14.33546 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J153609-3757.9
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.080 V Y 0.770 V 2452377.70000 178.026443000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:36:09.18 -37:57:52.9: 12.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:36:09.18 -37:57:52.9: 12.79 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J153609-3757.9,2461178.7318,11.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J153609-3757.9 20260518.2318 11.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.81684877 16.04.2026 07:36:05.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
First image: 2461146.81684877 16.04.2026 07:36:05.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Last image: 2461178.73217574 18.05.2026 05:34:09.984 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 21
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.48
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5506
Objects passed selection criteria: 5506
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5398.75
Average stars matched: 5321.25 (98.5645 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111980 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 18 01:41:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.81684877 16.04.2026 07:36:05.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
First image: 2461146.81684877 16.04.2026 07:36:05.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Last image: 2461178.73217574 18.05.2026 05:34:09.984 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 127
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 49492
Objects passed selection criteria: 49450
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 46325.8
Average stars matched: 45430.2 (98.0669 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 157608 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon May 18 01:44:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461178.73141177
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits'
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
Image size: 940.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:01.533 -34:00:50.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:01.533 -34:00:50.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0227 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
Image size: 940.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:03.964 -34:01:29.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:03.964 -34:01:29.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0294 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:39:01.533 -34:00:50.80
Second-epoch second image center 15:39:03.964 -34:01:29.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01368 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jynhWtca1m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.a2ORphupTI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SfSF9VodTU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tpJXilKJwH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Loaded 10950 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5601 out of 5758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5758 out of 7114 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.637500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.637500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Loaded 10950 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5601 out of 5758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5758 out of 7114 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 5034 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.8758 to 244.7163 deg, Dec -39.2722 to -28.3893 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.8758 to 244.7163 deg, Dec -39.2722 to -28.3893 deg
Loaded 10334 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4169 out of 4262 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4262 out of 5034 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 19 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.4 pix Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
3.9 pix fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
4.0 pix fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
13.6 mag. Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.0 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.jynhWtca1m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=539, passed=7114
Got 7114 stars (including 6567 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7014 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.466 n_q1=257 n_q2=216 n_q3=212 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.a2ORphupTI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=346, passed=5034
Got 5034 stars (including 4686 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5034 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.618 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.730 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.641 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.591 n_q1=240 n_q2=225 n_q3=198 n_q4=296 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.180
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SfSF9VodTU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=200, passed=4790
Got 4790 stars (including 4586 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4790 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4685 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.646 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.645 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.448 n_q1=224 n_q2=175 n_q3=240 n_q4=309 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.225
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tpJXilKJwH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=191, passed=4779
Got 4779 stars (including 4585 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4779 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.661 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.675 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.418 n_q1=223 n_q2=184 n_q3=236 n_q4=304 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.335
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits sigma_overall=0.450 worst_q_ratio=1.089
ref2=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits sigma_overall=0.618 worst_q_ratio=1.180
new1=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits sigma_overall=0.527 worst_q_ratio=1.225
new2=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits sigma_overall=0.506 worst_q_ratio=1.335
reference average sigma_overall=0.534 worst_q_ratio=1.1345
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697_astrometric_residuals.png (948 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:03:22.12 -33:16:01.2: 11.73 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:55:56.17 -32:41:21.2: 11.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:51:48.99 -31:20:58.5: 11.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:31:16.01 -31:07:15.8: 11.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:03:22.12 -33:16:01.2: 11.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:55:56.17 -32:41:21.2: 11.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:22.12 -33:16:01.2: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.8850 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:56.17 -32:41:21.2: ref_mag=11.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9955 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:51:48.99 -31:20:58.5: 11.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:48.99 -31:20:58.5: ref_mag=11.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0351 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:03:42.56 -29:26:27.2: 11.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:09:53.27 -29:13:34.9: 11.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:53:49.93 -34:50:28.7: 11.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:31:16.01 -31:07:15.8: 11.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:31:16.01 -31:07:15.8: ref_mag=11.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8914 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:03:42.56 -29:26:27.2: 11.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:09:53.27 -29:13:34.9: 11.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:42.56 -29:26:27.2: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2355 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:53:49.93 -34:50:28.7: 11.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:09:53.27 -29:13:34.9: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2838 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:53:49.93 -34:50:28.7: ref_mag=11.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.4406 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out03205.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20256_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 20256_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:28.80 -36:17:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20258_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 20258_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:28.05 -30:54:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20259_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 20259_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:28.68 -32:47:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20261_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 20261_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20262_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 20262_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20265_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 20265_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20269_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 20269_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20270_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 20270_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:06:49.11 -33:12:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20274_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 20274_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:05:58.56 -29:09:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20275_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 20275_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:09:15.70 -31:10:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20284_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 20284_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20288_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 20288_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03630_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 03630_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:36:35.32 -33:50:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04751_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 04751_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:14:40.88 -32:23:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03205_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 03205_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:49.93 -34:50:28.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.600 6012026265249727488 238.45858233054 -34.84073561924 9.3640 7.8821 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.600#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00641_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 00641_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:01:56.97 -38:46:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05063_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 05063_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:12:15.14 -31:10:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02919_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 02919_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:40:11.45 -35:15:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02914_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 02914_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:54:30.75 -35:24:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
Image size: 940.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:01.533 -34:00:50.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:01.533 -34:00:50.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0227 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
Image size: 940.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:03.964 -34:01:29.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:03.964 -34:01:29.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0294 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:39:01.533 -34:00:50.80
Second-epoch second image center 15:39:03.964 -34:01:29.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01368 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sji9C4qjCl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Bw3XHCCUvK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rQTRcgE98e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FoeR8QhQP7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 70289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Loaded 11081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7807 out of 8626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8626 out of 70289 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.435700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.435700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 70289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Loaded 11081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7807 out of 8626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8626 out of 70289 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 50301 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.8758 to 244.8113 deg, Dec -39.2866 to -28.3393 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.8758 to 244.8113 deg, Dec -39.2866 to -28.3393 deg
Loaded 10431 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8115 out of 8700 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8700 out of 50301 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 123 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.2 pix Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
3.5 pix fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
3.5 pix fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
13.8 mag. Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.sji9C4qjCl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3491, passed=70279
Got 70279 stars (including 66700 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.478 n_q1=260 n_q2=227 n_q3=215 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Bw3XHCCUvK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2052, passed=50294
Got 50294 stars (including 48166 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50294 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49504 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49504 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.573 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.653 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.617 n_q1=242 n_q2=233 n_q3=180 n_q4=305 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.099
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rQTRcgE98e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1466, passed=32937
Got 32937 stars (including 31435 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32937 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.699 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.750 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.417 n_q1=200 n_q2=165 n_q3=257 n_q4=325 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.447
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FoeR8QhQP7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1537, passed=33339
Got 33339 stars (including 31767 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33339 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32693 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32694 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32694 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.696 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.733 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.400 n_q1=194 n_q2=172 n_q3=253 n_q4=326 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.498
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-33-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0697.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-18_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_004306_TTUQ1b1x1_2365567_PClgpVed/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:53:19.33 -38:08:55.2: 12.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:03:15.02 -36:50:40.3: 12.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:08:26.82 -30:09:50.3: 13.15 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:00:45.22 -35:51:26.9: 11.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:19:24.80 -38:30:33.4: 13.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:01:56.44 -35:29:42.5: 11.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:36:45.53 -28:51:33.4: 11.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:53:19.33 -38:08:55.2: 12.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:03:15.02 -36:50:40.3: 12.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:00:45.22 -35:51:26.9: 11.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:01:56.44 -35:29:42.5: 11.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:08:26.82 -30:09:50.3: 13.31 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:19.33 -38:08:55.2: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0869 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:03:15.02 -36:50:40.3: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0548 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:45.22 -35:51:26.9: ref_mag=11.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.1078 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:19:24.80 -38:30:33.4: 13.71 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:56.44 -35:29:42.5: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7164 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:08:26.82 -30:09:50.3: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.1068 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:19:24.80 -38:30:33.4: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=11.6473 delta=1.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:36:45.53 -28:51:33.4: 11.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:45.53 -28:51:33.4: ref_mag=11.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4965 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:39:03.98 -38:56:28.1: 12.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:07:46.49 -36:42:41.9: 13.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:10:24.92 -29:18:39.8: 13.08 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:38:22.02 -29:03:04.0: 13.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:17:08.31 -37:48:41.3: 13.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:01:04.49 -32:48:33.1: 14.21 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:32:39.54 -29:18:57.5: 13.89 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:39:03.98 -38:56:28.1: 12.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:39:03.98 -38:56:28.1: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1405 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:07:46.49 -36:42:41.9: 14.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:07:46.49 -36:42:41.9: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=12.4921 delta=1.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:57:25.57 -33:38:45.9: 14.34 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:10:24.92 -29:18:39.8: 12.85 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:24.92 -29:18:39.8: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.1928 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:38:22.02 -29:03:04.0: 12.96 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:01:04.49 -32:48:33.1: 13.91 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:22.02 -29:03:04.0: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2279 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:32:39.54 -29:18:57.5: 14.34 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:17:08.31 -37:48:41.3: 14.06 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:01:04.49 -32:48:33.1: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.1113 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:32:39.54 -29:18:57.5: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2650 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:17:08.31 -37:48:41.3: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.6620 delta=0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:57:25.57 -33:38:45.9: 14.01 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:57:25.57 -33:38:45.9: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=12.9887 delta=1.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:47:35.41 -29:20:06.6: 14.13 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:47:58.47 -37:26:38.8: 13.85 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:00:34.27 -33:34:38.8: 14.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:24:02.26 -36:59:27.8: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:37:33.34 -29:19:04.6: 13.90 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:43:37.93 -37:02:07.9: 13.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:47:35.41 -29:20:06.6: 13.81 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:47:58.47 -37:26:38.8: 14.33 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:35.41 -29:20:06.6: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.5452 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:47:58.47 -37:26:38.8: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=12.7763 delta=1.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:00:34.27 -33:34:38.8: 14.35 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:24:02.26 -36:59:27.8: 14.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:00:34.27 -33:34:38.8: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.2566 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:37:33.34 -29:19:04.6: 13.88 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:43:37.93 -37:02:07.9: 13.86 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:37:33.34 -29:19:04.6: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7044 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:37.93 -37:02:07.9: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=12.9111 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:24:03.28 -29:25:49.6: 14.29 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:56:07.53 -31:23:13.3: 13.94 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:53:35.34 -32:42:51.8: 14.31 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:03:59.73 -30:00:22.3: 13.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:24:03.28 -29:25:49.6: 14.13 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:24:03.28 -29:25:49.6: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5566 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:25:10.87 -29:35:23.4: 14.07 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:56:07.53 -31:23:13.3: 13.93 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:53:35.34 -32:42:51.8: 14.03 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:07.53 -31:23:13.3: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5558 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:35.34 -32:42:51.8: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.3209 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:03:59.73 -30:00:22.3: 13.36 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:59.73 -30:00:22.3: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6154 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:25:10.87 -29:35:23.4: 14.40 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:25:10.87 -29:35:23.4: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5486 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:36:10.58 -36:09:53.7: 14.50 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:21:01.59 -33:37:55.3: 13.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:36:10.58 -36:09:53.7: 14.17 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:36:10.58 -36:09:53.7: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.1933 delta=1.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:06:53.30 -37:23:33.1: 13.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:54:40.02 -36:45:29.5: 12.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:21:01.59 -33:37:55.3: 13.52 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:21:01.59 -33:37:55.3: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.6847 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:39:33.37 -36:00:08.2: 13.54 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:36:25.63 -37:07:32.5: 11.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:30:04.20 -32:38:36.4: 13.57 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:06:53.30 -37:23:33.1: 14.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:06:53.30 -37:23:33.1: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=11.3489 delta=2.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:54:40.02 -36:45:29.5: 12.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:54:40.02 -36:45:29.5: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.1239 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:39:33.37 -36:00:08.2: 13.97 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:36:25.63 -37:07:32.5: 12.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:39:33.37 -36:00:08.2: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.4991 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:36:25.63 -37:07:32.5: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.8513 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:30:04.20 -32:38:36.4: 13.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:30:04.20 -32:38:36.4: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.6894 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:36:42.26 -34:40:31.1: 13.09 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:24:14.10 -38:44:37.5: 11.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:36:42.26 -34:40:31.1: 13.24 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:36:42.26 -34:40:31.1: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.1239 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:24:14.10 -38:44:37.5: 12.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:24:14.10 -38:44:37.5: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.8493 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:51:24.10 -32:51:16.1: 13.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:55:42.16 -35:05:38.7: 13.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:51:24.10 -32:51:16.1: 13.10 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:51:24.10 -32:51:16.1: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.1143 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:55:42.16 -35:05:38.7: 13.14 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:55:42.16 -35:05:38.7: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.0780 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:38:41.59 -30:32:37.5: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:38:41.59 -30:32:37.5: 12.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:38:41.59 -30:32:37.5: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.4107 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:09:07.88 -37:06:32.6: 12.74 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:09:07.88 -37:06:32.6: 12.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:09:07.88 -37:06:32.6: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=11.6270 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:28:47.14 -33:16:28.7: 12.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:13:12.08 -31:14:00.6: 12.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:28:47.14 -33:16:28.7: 12.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:28:47.14 -33:16:28.7: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.7613 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:13:12.08 -31:14:00.6: 12.80 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:13:12.08 -31:14:00.6: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.3298 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:21:08.83 -33:31:33.6: 13.77 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:36:54.56 -30:10:45.9: 12.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:47:42.45 -29:44:57.8: 13.98 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:16:41.82 -37:40:05.1: 12.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:21:08.83 -33:31:33.6: 14.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:21:08.83 -33:31:33.6: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=12.6526 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:36:54.56 -30:10:45.9: 12.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:36:54.56 -30:10:45.9: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.7167 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:47:42.45 -29:44:57.8: 13.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:42.45 -29:44:57.8: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.2473 delta=0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:16:41.82 -37:40:05.1: 12.68 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:16:41.82 -37:40:05.1: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.3696 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:52:28.79 -36:19:31.7: 13.41 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:06:46.49 -36:27:50.9: 12.99 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:52:28.79 -36:19:31.7: 13.60 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:52:28.79 -36:19:31.7: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.3501 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:06:46.49 -36:27:50.9: 12.90 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:06:46.49 -36:27:50.9: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=11.9914 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:53:49.94 -34:50:28.3: 11.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:53:49.94 -34:50:28.3: 11.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:53:49.94 -34:50:28.3: ref_mag=11.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.4442 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:40:17.07 -38:00:39.4: 11.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:40:17.07 -38:00:39.4: 12.22 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:40:17.07 -38:00:39.4: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.0045 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:33:57.02 -38:36:42.0: 12.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:33:57.02 -38:36:42.0: 13.07 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:33:57.02 -38:36:42.0: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=11.8457 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:35:34.51 -35:04:59.3: 10.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:13:47.64 -38:55:10.5: 13.01 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:13:47.64 -38:55:10.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:47.64 -38:55:10.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:36:09.18 -37:57:52.9: 12.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:35:34.51 -35:04:59.3: 11.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:35:34.51 -35:04:59.3: ref_mag=10.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=9.8530 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:36:09.18 -37:57:52.9: 12.79 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:36:09.18 -37:57:52.9: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.3054 delta=1.16 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21198.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out35701.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out49169.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out83636.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out83643.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out83653.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out83661.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out83664.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out83691.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01796.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out03996.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07996.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08038.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08790.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08792.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out14536.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16126.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out18324.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20563.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22380.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out27256.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out28956.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30232.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30315.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38312.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54371.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56592.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58877.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65243.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out83574.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out83624.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 12s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83554_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83554_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83556_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83556_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:39.79 -29:47:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83565_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83565_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83570_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83570_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:43:39.61 -29:09:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83571_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83571_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83574_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
Preparing report for the candidate 83574_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83576_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83576_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83581_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83581_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83589_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83589_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83590_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83590_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:23:58.23 -38:39:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83592_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83592_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:38:51.05 -35:44:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83595_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83595_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:11.38 -31:45:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83598_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83598_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:00.29 -35:11:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83604_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83604_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:41:33.54 -29:12:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83605_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83605_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:01:10.38 -36:01:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83606_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83606_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:38.16 -29:15:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83607_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83607_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:16:07.62 -30:43:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83608_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83608_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:17.01 -30:14:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83609_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83609_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:29:25.98 -28:51:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83613_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83613_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:19.75 -35:45:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83614_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83614_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:59.75 -30:58:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83615_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83615_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:26:26.72 -38:06:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83616_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83616_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:13:07.68 -29:37:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83617_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83617_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:36.81 -29:50:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83621_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83621_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83623_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83623_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:41.18 -33:16:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83624_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
Preparing report for the candidate 83624_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83626_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83626_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:17:02.52 -38:00:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83628_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83628_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:45:19.81 -36:27:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83631_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83631_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83634_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83634_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83636_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83636_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:01:04.49 -32:48:33.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.11)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.958 6036279945573365888 240.26848373025 -32.80900700203 12.3786 11.0291 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.958#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83638_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83638_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83639_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83639_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83641_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83641_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:04:09.76 -35:08:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83643_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83643_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:57:25.57 -33:38:45.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.296 6012206172842362368 239.35668669139 -33.64545709881 11.5580 9.8960 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.296#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83644_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83644_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:42.69 -34:41:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83649_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83649_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:28:26.85 -37:33:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83651_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83651_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83653_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83653_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:58.47 -37:26:38.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.007 6009658844919474560 236.99397644507 -37.44413232491 11.6251 10.0887 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.007#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83661_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83661_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:00:34.27 -33:34:38.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.893 6036027401498511872 240.14316376307 -33.57701980093 11.9461 10.3726 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.893#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83664_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83664_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:24:02.26 -36:59:27.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.00, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.98)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.694 6007480055245431168 231.00958912226 -36.99119027126 12.4979 10.5015 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.694#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83668_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83668_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83671_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83671_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83675_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83675_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83676_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83676_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83677_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83677_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83678_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83678_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83685_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83685_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83691_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83691_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:36:10.58 -36:09:53.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.291 6013156455820321280 234.04483256383 -36.16471887608 12.2482 10.8979 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.291#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83697_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83697_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:31:36.53 -35:16:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83700_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 83700_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:25:27.31 -34:31:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01409_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 01409_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:25:20.25 -38:44:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02397_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 02397_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:59:13.48 -37:52:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35027_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 35027_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01112_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 01112_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:00.69 -39:12:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19068_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 19068_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:04.40 -36:03:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12935_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 12935_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:21:03.97 -37:04:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26709_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 26709_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:40:11.52 -35:15:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18324_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
Preparing report for the candidate 18324_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08038_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
Preparing report for the candidate 08038_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14536_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
Preparing report for the candidate 14536_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22380_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
Preparing report for the candidate 22380_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49169_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 49169_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:30:04.20 -32:38:36.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.791 6206763518420460544 232.51767760349 -32.64328328777 11.0210 9.6311 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.791#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09028_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 09028_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:04:58.60 -38:09:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30315_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
Preparing report for the candidate 30315_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01796_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
Preparing report for the candidate 01796_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03142_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 03142_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:33:17.14 -38:42:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21823_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 21823_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:35:40.58 -36:01:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58877_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
Preparing report for the candidate 58877_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28956_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
Preparing report for the candidate 28956_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35279_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 35279_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:36:35.31 -33:50:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67563_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 67563_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:14:40.88 -32:23:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56592_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
Preparing report for the candidate 56592_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04406_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 04406_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:01:56.97 -38:46:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24711_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 24711_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:17:25.61 -35:10:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16126_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
Preparing report for the candidate 16126_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15634_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 15634_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:40:43.34 -37:03:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65124_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 65124_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:12:15.14 -31:10:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60237_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 60237_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:28.68 -32:47:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25975_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 25975_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:13:13.42 -34:51:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38312_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
Preparing report for the candidate 38312_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13276_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 13276_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:01:08.31 -36:26:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21298_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 21298_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:28.79 -36:17:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65243_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
Preparing report for the candidate 65243_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23043_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 23043_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:25.30 -36:04:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41555_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 41555_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:06:49.11 -33:12:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38903_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 38903_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:24:08.40 -33:02:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12709_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 12709_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:27:39.74 -37:16:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35701_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 35701_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:21:08.83 -33:31:33.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.693 6206461560741234560 230.28674559555 -33.52553139338 12.0469 10.5908 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.693#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58554_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 58554_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:55.73 -31:05:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54371_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
Preparing report for the candidate 54371_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07996_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
Preparing report for the candidate 07996_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50520_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 50520_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07440_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 07440_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:13.00 -38:17:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21198_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 21198_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:52:28.79 -36:19:31.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.655 6011231661943916672 238.12085111812 -36.32563524975 11.1052 9.6146 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.655#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20563_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
Preparing report for the candidate 20563_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07602_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 07602_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:28:53.78 -37:59:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30232_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
Preparing report for the candidate 30232_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26686_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 26686_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:54:30.75 -35:24:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08790_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
Preparing report for the candidate 08790_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19295_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 19295_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:25:47.67 -36:13:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11445_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 11445_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:09:25.37 -36:58:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03996_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
Preparing report for the candidate 03996_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65053_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 65053_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:34.32 -31:50:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08809_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 08809_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:19:15.40 -37:38:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27256_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
Preparing report for the candidate 27256_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03499_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 03499_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08792_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
Preparing report for the candidate 08792_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50301_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 50301_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:22:25.36 -31:31:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29883_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 29883_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:42:41.13 -34:42:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12229_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 12229_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:42:38.19 -37:25:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35521_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 35521_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:53.50 -33:57:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09350_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 09350_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:28.19 -37:55:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21593_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 21593_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:57:21.14 -36:11:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15531_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 15531_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:27:18.24 -36:46:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17381_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 17381_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:21:48.59 -36:15:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14109_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 14109_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:23:09.65 -36:51:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15086_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 15086_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:06:13.98 -36:15:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06405_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 06405_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:00:07.06 -38:23:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17721_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 17721_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:06:35.36 -36:48:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05216_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 05216_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:24.06 -38:36:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01475_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698
The candidate 01475_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0698 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:01:13.09 -38:03:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 2s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 32s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
15:24:14.10 -38:44:37.5
15:33:57.02 -38:36:42.0
15:16:41.82 -37:40:05.1
15:06:53.30 -37:23:33.1
15:40:17.07 -38:00:39.4
15:36:09.18 -37:57:52.9
15:36:25.63 -37:07:32.5
16:09:07.88 -37:06:32.6
15:54:40.02 -36:45:29.5
16:06:46.49 -36:27:50.9
15:39:33.37 -36:00:08.2
15:35:34.51 -35:04:59.3
15:55:42.16 -35:05:38.7
15:53:49.94 -34:50:28.3
15:36:42.26 -34:40:31.1
15:28:47.14 -33:16:28.7
15:36:54.56 -30:10:45.9
15:38:41.59 -30:32:37.5
15:51:24.10 -32:51:16.1
15:13:12.08 -31:14:00.6
15:19:24.80 -38:30:33.4
15:07:46.49 -36:42:41.9
########### Completed Lup-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
15:19:24.80 -38:30:33.4
15:07:46.49 -36:42:41.9
15:54:40.02 -36:45:29.5
15:06:53.30 -37:23:33.1
15:36:25.63 -37:07:32.5
15:39:33.37 -36:00:08.2
15:36:42.26 -34:40:31.1
15:24:14.10 -38:44:37.5
15:51:24.10 -32:51:16.1
15:55:42.16 -35:05:38.7
15:38:41.59 -30:32:37.5
16:09:07.88 -37:06:32.6
15:28:47.14 -33:16:28.7
15:13:12.08 -31:14:00.6
15:36:54.56 -30:10:45.9
15:16:41.82 -37:40:05.1
16:06:46.49 -36:27:50.9
15:53:49.94 -34:50:28.3
15:40:17.07 -38:00:39.4
15:33:57.02 -38:36:42.0
15:35:34.51 -35:04:59.3
15:36:09.18 -37:57:52.9
###################################################################################
15:19:24.80 -38:30:33.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
15:07:46.49 -36:42:41.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
15:54:40.02 -36:45:29.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
15:06:53.30 -37:23:33.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
15:36:25.63 -37:07:32.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
15:39:33.37 -36:00:08.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
15:36:42.26 -34:40:31.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
15:24:14.10 -38:44:37.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
15:51:24.10 -32:51:16.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
15:55:42.16 -35:05:38.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
15:38:41.59 -30:32:37.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
16:09:07.88 -37:06:32.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
15:28:47.14 -33:16:28.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
15:13:12.08 -31:14:00.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
15:36:54.56 -30:10:45.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
15:16:41.82 -37:40:05.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
16:06:46.49 -36:27:50.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
15:53:49.94 -34:50:28.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
15:40:17.07 -38:00:39.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
15:33:57.02 -38:36:42.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
15:35:34.51 -35:04:59.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
15:36:09.18 -37:57:52.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
15:06:53.30 -37:23:33.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
15:07:46.49 -36:42:41.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
15:13:12.08 -31:14:00.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
15:16:41.82 -37:40:05.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
15:19:24.80 -38:30:33.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
15:24:14.10 -38:44:37.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
15:28:47.14 -33:16:28.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
15:33:57.02 -38:36:42.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
15:35:34.51 -35:04:59.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
15:36:09.18 -37:57:52.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
15:36:25.63 -37:07:32.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
15:36:42.26 -34:40:31.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
15:36:54.56 -30:10:45.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
15:38:41.59 -30:32:37.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
15:39:33.37 -36:00:08.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
15:40:17.07 -38:00:39.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
15:51:24.10 -32:51:16.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
15:53:49.94 -34:50:28.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
15:54:40.02 -36:45:29.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
15:55:42.16 -35:05:38.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
16:06:46.49 -36:27:50.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
16:09:07.88 -37:06:32.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
15:06:53.30 -37:23:33.1 -- a known variable star
15:07:46.49 -36:42:41.9 -- a known variable star
15:13:12.08 -31:14:00.6 -- a known variable star
15:16:41.82 -37:40:05.1 -- a known variable star
15:19:24.80 -38:30:33.4 -- not a known variable star
15:24:14.10 -38:44:37.5 -- a known variable star
15:28:47.14 -33:16:28.7 -- a known variable star
15:33:57.02 -38:36:42.0 -- a known variable star
15:35:34.51 -35:04:59.3 -- a known variable star
15:36:09.18 -37:57:52.9 -- a known variable star
15:36:25.63 -37:07:32.5 -- a known variable star
15:36:42.26 -34:40:31.1 -- a known variable star
15:36:54.56 -30:10:45.9 -- a known variable star
15:38:41.59 -30:32:37.5 -- a known variable star
15:39:33.37 -36:00:08.2 -- a known variable star
15:40:17.07 -38:00:39.4 -- a known variable star
15:51:24.10 -32:51:16.1 -- a known variable star
15:53:49.94 -34:50:28.3 -- a known variable star
15:54:40.02 -36:45:29.5 -- a known variable star
15:55:42.16 -35:05:38.7 -- a known variable star
16:06:46.49 -36:27:50.9 -- a known variable star
16:09:07.88 -37:06:32.6 -- a known variable star
Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
22 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
15:06:53.30 -37:23:33.1
15:07:46.49 -36:42:41.9
15:13:12.08 -31:14:00.6
15:16:41.82 -37:40:05.1
15:19:24.80 -38:30:33.4
15:24:14.10 -38:44:37.5
15:28:47.14 -33:16:28.7
15:33:57.02 -38:36:42.0
15:35:34.51 -35:04:59.3
15:36:09.18 -37:57:52.9
15:36:25.63 -37:07:32.5
15:36:42.26 -34:40:31.1
15:36:54.56 -30:10:45.9
15:38:41.59 -30:32:37.5
15:39:33.37 -36:00:08.2
15:40:17.07 -38:00:39.4
15:51:24.10 -32:51:16.1
15:53:49.94 -34:50:28.3
15:54:40.02 -36:45:29.5
15:55:42.16 -35:05:38.7
16:06:46.49 -36:27:50.9
16:09:07.88 -37:06:32.6
15:53:49.93 -34:50:28.7
15:52:28.79 -36:19:31.7
15:21:08.83 -33:31:33.6
15:30:04.20 -32:38:36.4
16:01:04.49 -32:48:33.1
15:57:25.57 -33:38:45.9
15:47:58.47 -37:26:38.8
16:00:34.27 -33:34:38.8
15:24:02.26 -36:59:27.8
15:36:10.58 -36:09:53.7
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461178.73141177 -observatory V36
03:56:18.10 +21:11:11.7 Mercury (-2.0mag)
05:54:04.03 +25:00:00.4 Venus (-3.9mag)
01:49:17.75 +10:26:53.3 Mars (1.3mag)
07:32:01.43 +22:09:32.1 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:42:28.79 +02:09:33.8 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:55:08.03 +20:10:32.8 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:14:31.81 +00:07:24.7 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:34:08.87 -22:57:45.3 Pluto (14.5mag)
04:58:21.42 +26:52:34.4 Moon (-8.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 May 18 01:41 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461178.73141177:
07:32:08.33 +22:09:15.7 Io (5.9mag)
07:32:08.75 +22:09:15.0 Europa (6.1mag)
07:31:45.78 +22:10:15.0 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:32:29.24 +22:08:26.0 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:33:35.80 +21:46:49.3 Himalia (15.5mag)
07:32:05.69 +22:09:21.0 Thebe (16.4mag)
07:34:01.32 +22:11:21.1 Elara (17.5mag)
07:33:00.81 +22:32:33.4 Pasiphae (17.6mag)
07:39:26.03 +22:09:52.8 Carme (18.7mag)
00:42:28.69 +02:10:02.7 Titan (8.7mag)
00:42:29.69 +02:09:29.3 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:42:33.61 +02:08:19.8 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:42:27.01 +02:09:14.0 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:43:35.26 +02:14:25.8 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 18 01:41 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461178.73141177:
17:08:56.29 -31:25:18.0 JWST
15:57:19.91 +52:39:47.6 Chandra
08:24:29.95 -45:51:02.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 18 01:41 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461178.73141177 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
13:28:31.88 -27:51:23.2 14.5mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard)
06:23:41.86 +30:50:48.8 15.8mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks)
15:33:37.70 +00:55:39.9 14.7mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift)
05:15:26.60 +24:19:58.8 17.1mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr)
08:33:30.55 +21:17:08.9 17.8mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina)
18:54:00.46 -31:01:50.3 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:33:27.59 -68:27:18.6 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:41:36.61 +31:43:12.1 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:22:46.39 +13:55:07.2 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:14:50.05 +30:40:55.0 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:08:11.27 +26:44:49.2 16.3mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:16:14.61 +31:41:50.0 16.5mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:40:30.60 +02:41:35.6 17.5mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:40:52.96 +20:49:36.6 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:27:49.17 -11:05:51.0 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
08:59:46.26 -07:30:21.8 18.0mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
22:14:58.66 +65:05:36.1 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:33:46.81 -04:57:58.3 13.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
14:27:04.47 +87:16:26.3 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:44:10.78 +63:45:09.5 17.5mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:13:46.37 +25:26:18.5 12.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:54:32.99 +11:14:23.5 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:22:12.76 +24:43:20.0 14.2mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:57:03.98 -18:04:31.6 16.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:46:07.69 +38:18:28.4 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:57:37.16 +53:24:55.7 16.6mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:05:00.44 -09:22:29.6 11.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:42:34.76 +04:27:23.4 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
01:19:47.72 +41:37:58.5 15.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:11:55.32 -12:53:03.4 16.1mag A/2026 E1
19:44:46.90 -08:12:31.7 9.9mag 10P/Tempel
14:23:21.88 -01:17:25.7 16.9mag 24P/Schaumasse
10:59:05.44 -00:52:56.7 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:46:28.41 -02:36:35.2 17.6mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
02:39:00.72 +22:40:00.3 17.5mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:15:24.92 +29:27:05.0 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:06:46.06 -08:00:37.1 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
05:36:41.97 +30:12:11.7 16.3mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:19:09.69 +14:07:47.5 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels
00:31:47.41 -00:12:35.3 15.1mag 88P/Howell
03:47:27.97 +27:45:28.0 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
06:01:53.14 +33:19:46.2 15.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:14:50.90 +23:45:58.7 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos
03:24:35.38 +17:37:06.9 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
03:51:38.42 +17:45:59.9 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
04:18:56.00 +19:37:05.3 12.1mag 141P/Machholz
04:22:15.42 +14:57:11.8 12.0mag 141P-A/Machholz
03:04:06.92 +11:36:58.9 10.4mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:42:12.25 -27:59:23.6 17.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
02:35:28.73 +14:32:06.2 14.8mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:31:19.35 -03:29:49.3 17.9mag 169P/NEAT
17:08:07.36 -10:06:35.4 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR
06:46:49.87 +35:55:14.3 17.2mag 240P/NEAT
23:38:10.98 -10:46:28.7 17.0mag 260P/McNaught
03:10:11.73 +28:11:57.8 17.7mag 295P/LINEAR
15:26:09.01 +08:20:13.1 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
07:51:38.85 +21:10:22.9 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
06:25:52.48 +43:06:04.8 17.7mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K May 18 01:41 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 2026-05-13.41 16.8
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 2026-05-13.41 16.8
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 18 01:41 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 18 01:41 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
15:24:09.638 +44:04:26.94 AT 2026mgd 2026-05-07.24 20.4615
00:37:11.770 +29:37:48.99 AT 2026mgc 2026-05-07.50 18.7551
05:16:55.889 +51:31:59.34 AT 2026mgb 2026-05-09.15 17.8988
07:25:00.357 +38:20:16.78 AT 2026mga 2026-05-09.16 20.2044
21:08:35.106 +13:56:35.17 AT 2026mfz 2026-05-09.78 19.77
18:29:37.850 -51:43:35.00 AT 2026mfy 2026-05-10.32 16.1
13:34:03.642 +49:57:51.24 AT 2026mfx 2026-04-30.36 20.27
14:34:05.244 +09:55:34.18 AT 2026mfw 2026-05-06.35 20.77
00:45:05.656 +20:36:01.96 AT 2026mfv 2026-05-11.49 18.4889
23:13:56.047 +28:34:02.89 AT 2026mfu 2026-05-11.48 20.0674
21:29:58.778 +00:05:56.39 AT 2026mft 2026-05-11.47 19.8386
18:01:13.229 +10:03:03.38 AT 2026mfs 2026-05-08.43 20.2663
16:43:28.522 -11:16:06.15 AT 2026mfr 2026-05-08.35 19.7589
00:41:59.717 +50:47:29.07 AT 2026mfq 2026-05-07.49 19.4349
15:37:14.906 -12:09:25.69 AT 2026mfp 2026-05-07.37 20.2224
13:49:34.329 -03:03:36.93 AT 2026mfo 2026-05-07.29 20.3793
18:46:53.611 -51:14:17.28 AT 2026mfn 2026-05-09.66 19.6
19:08:51.668 -48:32:04.79 SN 2026mfm 2026-05-09.71 17.86
19:37:11.200 -44:20:46.81 SN 2026mfl 2026-05-09.71 18.81
19:44:56.756 -43:03:59.26 AT 2026mfk 2026-05-09.71 19.45
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 18 01:41 tns_transients_list.txt
