Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461178.6710,11.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260518.1710 11.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Leo-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 359524 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 359524 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits_preview.png'
Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits

renamed 'Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits_preview.png'
Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 534.9247
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 496.4573
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 990.4616
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 466.5285
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 991.8366
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 465.8481
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.85159
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 23.0200004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 23.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-17T23:05:38.8382017' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-18T04:05:38.8382017' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61178.170588403 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-18T04:05:48.7410250' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61178.1707030209 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 159.996486675661 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 13.9998527961929 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 52.5638888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 246.501388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.25862507613835 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 40 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20447 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20447 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.0200004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.0200004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= -6.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 13.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 890.32 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 23.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 24.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 16.601328 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 12.200976 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/d_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits :)
Spent 0.593155 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/d_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 27778.751589
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18343.5, right_median=21629.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 23.0200004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 23.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-17T23:06:26.2102850' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-18T04:06:26.2102850' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61178.1711366898 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-18T04:06:36.1131825' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61178.1712513077 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 159.996486678872 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 13.9998527972509 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 52.4108333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 246.699166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.26120151809095 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 40 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20447 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20447 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.0200004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.0200004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= -6.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 13.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 890.32 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 23.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 24.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 16.601328 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 12.200976 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/d_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits :)
Spent 0.573106 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/d_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 27778.751589
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18343.5, right_median=21629.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits

fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461178.67070414
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits'
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:00.483 +14:00:12.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13
Second-epoch image center 10:40:00.483 +14:00:12.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0486 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:57.592 +14:00:49.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13
Second-epoch image center 10:39:57.592 +14:00:49.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0333 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:40:00.483 +14:00:12.49
Second-epoch second image center 10:39:57.592 +14:00:49.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01550 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zyLrTpxsAZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qW8qVSjPT5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kn9CG9HR05
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L2GYbAPmX6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6682 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7675 to 168.2412 deg, Dec +8.6439 to +19.2936 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7675 to 168.2412 deg, Dec 8.6439 to 19.2936 deg
Loaded 4244 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3452 out of 3573 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3573 out of 6682 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.918700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.918700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6682 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7675 to 168.2412 deg, Dec +8.6439 to +19.2936 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7675 to 168.2412 deg, Dec 8.6439 to 19.2936 deg
Loaded 4244 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3452 out of 3573 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3573 out of 6682 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 6275 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.6959 to 168.1623 deg, Dec +8.5198 to +19.2643 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.6959 to 168.1623 deg, Dec 8.5198 to 19.2643 deg
Loaded 4298 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3432 out of 3542 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3542 out of 6275 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits (aperture=6.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
2.5 pix Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
2.4 pix fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
2.4 pix fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
15.2 mag. Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zyLrTpxsAZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=396, passed=6682
Got 6682 stars (including 6282 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6682 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6521 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6521 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6521 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 870 stars left (next iteration limit 957)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits N_match=870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=207 n_q2=258 n_q3=194 n_q4=211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qW8qVSjPT5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, passed=6275
Got 6275 stars (including 5894 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6275 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6135 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6139 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 864 stars left (next iteration limit 950)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits N_match=864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.492 n_q1=199 n_q2=224 n_q3=235 n_q4=206 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kn9CG9HR05 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=448, passed=6074
Got 6074 stars (including 5620 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6074 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 871 stars left (next iteration limit 958)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits N_match=871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.562 n_q1=204 n_q2=224 n_q3=234 n_q4=209 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.354
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.L2GYbAPmX6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=307, passed=5950
Got 5950 stars (including 5635 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5950 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 868 stars left (next iteration limit 954)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits N_match=868 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.520 n_q1=205 n_q2=223 n_q3=238 n_q4=202 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits sigma_overall=0.350 worst_q_ratio=1.238
ref2=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits sigma_overall=0.450 worst_q_ratio=1.095
new1=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits sigma_overall=0.415 worst_q_ratio=1.354
new2=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits sigma_overall=0.414 worst_q_ratio=1.258
reference average sigma_overall=0.4 worst_q_ratio=1.1665
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218_astrometric_residuals.png (870 matched stars from wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178_astrometric_residuals.png (864 matched stars from wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458_astrometric_residuals.png (871 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459_astrometric_residuals.png (868 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:22:21.70 +14:22:49.7: 15.27 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:22:21.70 +14:22:49.7: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:22:21.70 +14:22:49.7: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=11.5826 delta=3.69 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21492.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21492_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459
Preparing report for the candidate 21492_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21509_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459
The candidate 21509_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.17125 | 2461178.67125 | 12.45 | 10:22:13.61 +17:06:04.7 | 7350 1281 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits |
**** FOUND 10:22:13.64 +17:06:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:22:21.70 +14:22:49.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:00.483 +14:00:12.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13
Second-epoch image center 10:40:00.483 +14:00:12.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0486 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:57.592 +14:00:49.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:39:50.454 +14:01:49.13
Second-epoch image center 10:39:57.592 +14:00:49.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0333 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:40:00.483 +14:00:12.49
Second-epoch second image center 10:39:57.592 +14:00:49.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01550 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PSSH5Rl5pq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jLMV6sWRcV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits &> /tmp/tmp.c426nSVUcM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6ogMTKoHUg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32385 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7675 to 168.2695 deg, Dec +8.6169 to +19.3027 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7675 to 168.2695 deg, Dec 8.6169 to 19.3027 deg
Loaded 4269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3332 out of 3598 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3598 out of 32385 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.814000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.814000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32385 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7675 to 168.2695 deg, Dec +8.6169 to +19.3027 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7675 to 168.2695 deg, Dec 8.6169 to 19.3027 deg
Loaded 4269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3332 out of 3598 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3598 out of 32385 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits (aperture=5.2)
Read 31779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.6728 to 168.1777 deg, Dec +8.5198 to +19.2712 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.6728 to 168.1777 deg, Dec 8.5198 to 19.2712 deg
Loaded 4310 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3341 out of 3603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3603 out of 31779 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
2.2 pix Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
2.3 pix fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
2.3 pix fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PSSH5Rl5pq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1352, passed=32368
Got 32368 stars (including 30973 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32368 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 874 stars left (next iteration limit 961)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits N_match=874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.344 n_q1=204 n_q2=264 n_q3=190 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.200
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jLMV6sWRcV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1252, passed=31766
Got 31766 stars (including 30476 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31766 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 865 stars left (next iteration limit 951)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits N_match=865 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.465 n_q1=199 n_q2=236 n_q3=222 n_q4=208 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.022
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.c426nSVUcM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=6, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1236, passed=29213
Got 29213 stars (including 27944 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29213 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28628 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 872 stars left (next iteration limit 959)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits N_match=872 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.503 n_q1=208 n_q2=226 n_q3=233 n_q4=205 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.223
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6ogMTKoHUg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1180, passed=29136
Got 29136 stars (including 27917 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29136 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 872 stars left (next iteration limit 959)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits N_match=872 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.533 n_q1=213 n_q2=223 n_q3=237 n_q4=199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.352
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:47:19.21 +10:09:14.2: 15.21 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:54:47.59 +16:09:18.3: 14.81 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:55:00.58 +10:09:14.8: 15.12 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:57:36.10 +10:34:11.8: 14.78 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-28-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0218.fits at 10:56:19.20 +09:50:08.6: 15.12 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:47:19.21 +10:09:14.2: 15.13 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:47:19.21 +10:09:14.2: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9500 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:55:00.58 +10:09:14.8: 15.44 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:55:00.58 +10:09:14.8: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9704 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:57:36.10 +10:34:11.8: 15.29 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:54:47.59 +16:09:18.3: 14.79 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_00-19-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0178.fits at 10:56:19.20 +09:50:08.6: 15.33 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:57:36.10 +10:34:11.8: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8057 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:54:47.59 +16:09:18.3: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8178 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:56:19.20 +09:50:08.6: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8140 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57145_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459
The candidate 57145_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.17070 | 2461178.67070 | 14.78 | 10:54:47.57 +16:09:19.2 | 2631 1886 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.17125 | 2461178.67125 | 14.87 | 10:54:47.60 +16:09:17.4 | 2623 1893 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57194_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459
The candidate 57194_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.17125 | 2461178.67125 | 13.67 | 10:28:21.52 +15:46:16.4 | 6472 2111 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits |
**** FOUND 10:28:21.55 +15:46:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57211_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459
The candidate 57211_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.17125 | 2461178.67125 | 13.98 | 10:48:08.15 +14:13:05.8 | 3591 3073 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits |
**** FOUND 10:48:08.12 +14:13:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57222_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459
The candidate 57222_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.17125 | 2461178.67125 | 14.26 | 10:39:15.32 +14:46:15.3 | 4889 2737 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits |
**** FOUND 10:39:15.32 +14:46:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57234_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459
The candidate 57234_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.17125 | 2461178.67125 | 14.46 | 10:40:48.10 +17:55:17.4 | 4655 0829 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits |
**** FOUND 10:40:48.09 +17:55:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57501_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459
The candidate 57501_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.17070 | 2461178.67070 | 14.96 | 10:47:19.24 +10:09:13.3 | 3711 5530 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.17125 | 2461178.67125 | 14.93 | 10:47:19.18 +10:09:15.1 | 3704 5536 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57520_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459
The candidate 57520_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.17070 | 2461178.67070 | 14.87 | 10:56:19.20 +09:50:07.5 | 2362 5721 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.17125 | 2461178.67125 | 14.77 | 10:56:19.20 +09:50:09.7 | 2354 5727 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57530_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459
The candidate 57530_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.17070 | 2461178.67070 | 14.89 | 10:57:36.13 +10:34:12.8 | 2175 5272 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.17125 | 2461178.67125 | 14.74 | 10:57:36.08 +10:34:10.7 | 2168 5278 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57553_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459
The candidate 57553_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 05 18.17070 | 2461178.67070 | 14.98 | 10:55:00.53 +10:09:15.3 | 2561 5527 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-05-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1458.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 05 18.17125 | 2461178.67125 | 14.95 | 10:55:00.62 +10:09:14.3 | 2554 5534 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17688_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459
The candidate 17688_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 05 18.17125 | 2461178.67125 | 11.65 | 10:22:21.71 +14:22:49.6 | 7369 2934 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_231542_TTUQ2b1x1_1431113_4JdisnrY/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_23-06-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1459.fits |
**** FOUND 10:22:21.71 +14:22:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:22:21.70 +14:22:49.7
########### Completed Leo-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
10:22:21.70 +14:22:49.7
###################################################################################
10:22:21.70 +14:22:49.7 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461178.67070414 -observatory V36
03:55:45.20 +21:08:59.3 Mercury (-2.0mag)
05:53:44.76 +24:59:51.3 Venus (-3.9mag)
01:49:07.27 +10:25:53.4 Mars (1.3mag)
07:31:58.80 +22:09:37.9 Jupiter (-1.9mag)
00:42:27.42 +02:09:25.9 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:55:07.15 +20:10:30.2 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:14:31.46 +00:07:22.6 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:34:08.93 -22:57:44.3 Pluto (14.5mag)
04:53:20.03 +26:54:12.6 Moon (-8.5mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 May 17 23:20 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461178.67070414:
07:32:04.75 +22:09:24.3 Io (5.9mag)
07:32:05.09 +22:09:23.6 Europa (6.1mag)
07:31:42.76 +22:10:21.4 Ganymede (5.5mag)
07:32:26.21 +22:08:33.0 Callisto (6.7mag)
07:33:33.38 +21:46:55.7 Himalia (15.5mag)
07:32:01.68 +22:09:31.3 Thebe (16.4mag)
07:33:58.94 +22:11:28.9 Elara (17.5mag)
07:32:57.94 +22:32:41.1 Pasiphae (17.6mag)
07:39:23.52 +22:09:58.3 Carme (18.7mag)
00:42:27.59 +02:09:54.7 Titan (8.7mag)
00:42:27.92 +02:09:21.9 Rhea (10.0mag)
00:42:32.09 +02:08:11.4 Iapetus (11.4mag)
00:42:25.42 +02:09:06.5 Hyperion (14.7mag)
00:43:33.96 +02:14:18.4 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 17 23:20 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461178.67070414:
17:09:03.22 -31:22:32.8 JWST
15:46:48.69 +53:25:14.4 Chandra
08:10:56.64 -42:41:54.8 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 17 23:20 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461178.67070414 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
13:28:36.08 -27:51:44.0 14.5mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard)
06:23:35.71 +30:50:53.1 15.8mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks)
15:33:41.12 +00:55:25.7 14.7mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift)
05:15:20.76 +24:19:49.5 17.1mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr)
08:33:03.46 +21:19:57.0 17.8mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina)
18:54:01.53 -31:01:32.7 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:33:24.23 -68:27:24.6 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:41:35.37 +31:43:09.9 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:22:47.68 +13:54:48.4 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:14:50.00 +30:40:44.6 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:08:06.75 +26:44:46.0 16.3mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:16:12.59 +31:41:55.2 16.5mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:40:29.09 +02:41:20.2 17.5mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:40:54.93 +20:49:24.8 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:27:50.77 -11:05:53.0 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
08:59:46.47 -07:30:45.9 18.0mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
22:14:57.65 +65:05:20.0 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
18:33:54.01 -04:57:44.1 13.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
14:27:39.85 +87:17:02.0 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:44:06.74 +63:45:05.8 17.5mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:13:40.21 +25:25:47.4 12.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:54:36.08 +11:13:55.2 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:22:13.57 +24:42:12.4 14.2mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:57:00.35 -18:04:56.7 16.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:46:04.22 +38:19:10.7 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:57:43.88 +53:24:53.4 16.6mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:04:48.71 -09:21:57.1 11.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:42:35.69 +04:27:17.8 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
01:19:39.77 +41:37:36.4 15.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:11:56.48 -12:54:58.1 16.1mag A/2026 E1
19:44:40.03 -08:12:36.4 9.9mag 10P/Tempel
14:23:24.67 -01:16:50.4 16.9mag 24P/Schaumasse
10:59:05.31 -00:52:58.0 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:46:26.45 -02:36:38.0 17.6mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
02:38:54.96 +22:39:27.6 17.5mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
08:15:17.26 +29:28:01.6 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:06:42.17 -08:00:57.0 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
05:36:30.64 +30:11:27.2 16.3mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
02:19:01.06 +14:07:11.6 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels
00:31:38.22 -00:13:32.8 15.1mag 88P/Howell
03:47:16.39 +27:44:52.0 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
06:01:44.93 +33:19:45.1 15.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
09:14:45.05 +23:47:36.1 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos
03:24:29.39 +17:36:47.7 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
03:51:31.07 +17:45:42.7 17.7mag 131P/Mueller
04:18:37.20 +19:36:57.1 12.1mag 141P/Machholz
04:21:57.04 +14:56:25.8 12.0mag 141P-A/Machholz
03:03:47.35 +11:35:55.8 10.4mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:42:09.42 -28:00:01.9 17.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
02:35:17.62 +14:30:22.2 14.8mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:31:17.45 -03:30:35.4 17.9mag 169P/NEAT
17:08:09.89 -10:06:57.6 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR
06:46:41.51 +35:55:14.5 17.2mag 240P/NEAT
23:38:01.60 -10:47:48.5 17.0mag 260P/McNaught
03:10:02.78 +28:11:09.2 17.7mag 295P/LINEAR
15:26:11.10 +08:20:10.5 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
07:51:36.40 +21:10:26.2 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS
06:25:46.58 +43:06:19.0 17.7mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K May 17 23:20 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 2026-05-13.41 16.8
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 2026-05-13.41 16.8
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 17 23:20 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 17 23:20 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
13:34:03.642 +49:57:51.24 AT 2026mfx 2026-04-30.36 20.27
14:34:05.244 +09:55:34.18 AT 2026mfw 2026-05-06.35 20.77
00:45:05.656 +20:36:01.96 AT 2026mfv 2026-05-11.49 18.4889
23:13:56.047 +28:34:02.89 AT 2026mfu 2026-05-11.48 20.0674
21:29:58.778 +00:05:56.39 AT 2026mft 2026-05-11.47 19.8386
18:01:13.229 +10:03:03.38 AT 2026mfs 2026-05-08.43 20.2663
16:43:28.522 -11:16:06.15 AT 2026mfr 2026-05-08.35 19.7589
00:41:59.717 +50:47:29.07 AT 2026mfq 2026-05-07.49 19.4349
15:37:14.906 -12:09:25.69 AT 2026mfp 2026-05-07.37 20.2224
13:49:34.329 -03:03:36.93 AT 2026mfo 2026-05-07.29 20.3793
18:46:53.611 -51:14:17.28 AT 2026mfn 2026-05-09.66 19.6
19:08:51.668 -48:32:04.79 SN 2026mfm 2026-05-09.71 17.86
19:37:11.200 -44:20:46.81 SN 2026mfl 2026-05-09.71 18.81
19:44:56.756 -43:03:59.26 AT 2026mfk 2026-05-09.71 19.45
20:07:09.779 -55:24:02.93 AT 2026mfj 2026-05-09.74 19.73
21:34:20.625 -53:28:23.12 AT 2026mfi 2026-05-05.76 19.54
21:46:07.248 -56:40:38.39 AT 2026mfh 2026-05-05.76 18.9
10:48:27.292 +32:35:39.15 AT 2026mfg 2026-05-05.88 19.78
11:15:35.886 +40:46:38.37 AT 2026mff 2026-05-09.89 19.57
10:38:50.771 +39:13:06.38 AT 2026mfe 2026-05-02.18 19.3692
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 17 23:20 tns_transients_list.txt