This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.4495 2461177.9495 13.80 17:51:42.14 +01:11:36.7
27.08370 13.81585 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.780 Armenia -1 0 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:51:42.14 +01:11:36.7: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:51:42.14 +01:11:36.7: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.9495,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.4495 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.4495 2461177.9495 12.07 17:51:51.97 -05:01:17.4
21.50158 10.83312 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J175152-0501.3
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.990 Ic Y 0.291 Ic 2452504.80000 83.880000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:51:51.97 -05:01:17.4: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:51:51.97 -05:01:17.4: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J175152-0501.3,2461177.9495,12.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J175152-0501.3 20260517.4495 12.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.4495 2461177.9495 12.79 17:46:01.09 +00:39:29.1
25.91072 14.82275 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS J1746009+003930
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.793 R1 Y 0.266 R1 96.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:46:01.09 +00:39:29.1: 13.86 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:46:01.09 +00:39:29.1: 13.68 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1746009+003930,2461177.9495,12.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1746009+003930 20260517.4495 12.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.4495 2461177.9495 9.29 17:43:16.10 -03:53:29.2
21.45144 13.25526 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" V2057 Oph
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.990 V Y 0.420 V 2452136.90000 83.643829000000 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:43:16.10 -03:53:29.2: 10.35 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:43:16.10 -03:53:29.2: 10.34 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.34 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2057 Oph,2461177.9495,9.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2057 Oph 20260517.4495 9.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.4495 2461177.9495 11.95 17:42:30.97 +02:09:37.0
26.86605 16.29776 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" ASAS J174231+0209.7
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.070 V Y 0.270 V 2452041.20000 53.716079000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:42:30.97 +02:09:37.0: 12.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:42:30.97 +02:09:37.0: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J174231+0209.7,2461177.9495,11.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J174231+0209.7 20260517.4495 11.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.4495 2461177.9495 12.24 17:43:19.42 -03:30:19.5
21.80528 13.43039 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" V2607 Oph
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.500 V 14.700 V 120.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:43:19.42 -03:30:19.5: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:43:19.42 -03:30:19.5: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2607 Oph,2461177.9495,12.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2607 Oph 20260517.4495 12.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461140.81141503 10.04.2026 07:28:16.259 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
First image: 2461140.81141503 10.04.2026 07:28:16.259 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Last image: 2461177.94978628 17.05.2026 10:47:31.535 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 20
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.10
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7053
Objects passed selection criteria: 7029
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5423.25
Average stars matched: 5004.5 (92.2786 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112164 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 17 06:36:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461140.81141503 10.04.2026 07:28:16.259 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
First image: 2461140.81141503 10.04.2026 07:28:16.259 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Last image: 2461177.94978628 17.05.2026 10:47:31.535 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 68
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 69751
Objects passed selection criteria: 69590
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 53970.2
Average stars matched: 49799.8 (92.2726 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 165760 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 17 06:39:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461177.94914741
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Image size: 942.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:57.293 -01:59:39.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.91"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:00.114 -01:59:53.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:57.293 -01:59:39.12
Second-epoch image center 18:00:00.114 -01:59:53.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0124 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:58.785 -02:00:28.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:57.293 -01:59:39.12
Second-epoch image center 17:59:58.785 -02:00:28.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0151 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:00:00.114 -01:59:53.51
Second-epoch second image center 17:59:58.785 -02:00:28.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01121 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UQ16nDUBAY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LieyZEgjeW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qkH9ywla7u
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eTmuAazEQI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7172 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.8147 to 278.1309 deg, Dec -7.7350 to +3.7732 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.8147 to 278.1309 deg, Dec -7.7350 to 3.7732 deg
Loaded 6284 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4103 out of 4269 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4269 out of 7172 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.673900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.673900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.10
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7172 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.8147 to 278.1309 deg, Dec -7.7350 to +3.7732 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.8147 to 278.1309 deg, Dec -7.7350 to 3.7732 deg
Loaded 6284 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4103 out of 4269 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4269 out of 7172 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7201 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.7679 to 278.1309 deg, Dec -7.7362 to +3.7460 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.7679 to 278.1309 deg, Dec -7.7362 to 3.7460 deg
Loaded 6269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4104 out of 4265 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4265 out of 7201 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 17 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.3 pix Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
2.9 pix fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
2.9 pix fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
14.6 mag. Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.UQ16nDUBAY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=510, passed=7172
Got 7172 stars (including 6656 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7172 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.417 n_q1=194 n_q2=137 n_q3=324 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LieyZEgjeW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=504, passed=7201
Got 7201 stars (including 6687 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7201 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits N_match=909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=191 n_q2=141 n_q3=322 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qkH9ywla7u (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=472, passed=6036
Got 6036 stars (including 5561 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6036 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.2 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.697 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.015 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.959 n_q1=311 n_q2=289 n_q3=146 n_q4=167 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.457
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eTmuAazEQI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=459, passed=5690
Got 5690 stars (including 5226 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5690 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5533 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.688 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.949 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.922 n_q1=306 n_q2=296 n_q3=148 n_q4=163 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.380
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits sigma_overall=0.451 worst_q_ratio=1.126
ref2=Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits sigma_overall=0.448 worst_q_ratio=1.087
new1=fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits sigma_overall=0.697 worst_q_ratio=1.457
new2=fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits sigma_overall=0.688 worst_q_ratio=1.380
reference average sigma_overall=0.4495 worst_q_ratio=1.1065
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163_astrometric_residuals.png (909 matched stars from wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164_astrometric_residuals.png (909 matched stars from wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335_astrometric_residuals.png (913 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336_astrometric_residuals.png (913 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:01:14.80 -02:53:40.5: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:17:59.32 +02:15:49.4: 12.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:02:51.15 -03:27:46.7: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:06:02.13 +00:20:14.0: 11.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:06:29.80 -01:53:37.7: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:11:03.87 -00:59:03.6: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:06:14.47 -04:03:49.5: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:01:03.25 -00:41:42.9: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:04:40.41 -03:09:46.2: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:00:19.94 -00:47:45.1: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:02:51.15 -03:27:46.7: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:06:02.13 +00:20:14.0: 11.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:06:29.80 -01:53:37.7: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:17:59.32 +02:15:49.4: 12.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:01:14.80 -02:53:40.5: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:02:51.15 -03:27:46.7: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6781 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:06:02.13 +00:20:14.0: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7143 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:06:29.80 -01:53:37.7: ref_mag=11.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6008 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:17:59.32 +02:15:49.4: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.1960 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:01:14.80 -02:53:40.5: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5386 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:11:03.87 -00:59:03.6: 11.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:01:03.25 -00:41:42.9: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:06:14.47 -04:03:49.5: 11.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:00:19.94 -00:47:45.1: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:11:03.87 -00:59:03.6: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6933 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:04:40.41 -03:09:46.2: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:01:03.25 -00:41:42.9: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7449 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:06:14.47 -04:03:49.5: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7123 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:00:19.94 -00:47:45.1: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7223 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:04:40.41 -03:09:46.2: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7398 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:59:21.79 +00:19:21.2: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:59:21.79 +00:19:21.2: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:59:21.79 +00:19:21.2: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7631 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21004.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20892_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 20892_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:47.43 +01:59:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21004_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 21004_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:59.32 +02:15:49.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.962 4277511041389527808 274.49792876332 +02.26451684423 12.0337 10.1064 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.962#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21155_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 21155_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:22.77 +00:34:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21212_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 21212_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21217_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 21217_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:16.90 -01:43:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21262_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 21262_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21298_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 21298_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:30.86 -00:06:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21317_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 21317_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:28.05 +02:04:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21340_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 21340_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21342_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 21342_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21344_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 21344_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21351_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 21351_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21373_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 21373_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21385_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 21385_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21398_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 21398_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21399_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 21399_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:37.02 -01:20:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21403_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 21403_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Image size: 942.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:57.293 -01:59:39.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.91"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:00.114 -01:59:53.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:57.293 -01:59:39.12
Second-epoch image center 18:00:00.114 -01:59:53.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0124 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:58.785 -02:00:28.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:57.293 -01:59:39.12
Second-epoch image center 17:59:58.785 -02:00:28.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0151 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:00:00.114 -01:59:53.51
Second-epoch second image center 17:59:58.785 -02:00:28.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01121 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NAcsVxHnA2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kH8xVNBfRd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9gEQu7bM45
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4Moz5Gsmao
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits and wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 77266 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.7732 to 278.1783 deg, Dec -7.7395 to +3.7731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.7732 to 278.1783 deg, Dec -7.7395 to 3.7731 deg
Loaded 6323 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4079 out of 4760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4760 out of 77266 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.478700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.478700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.82
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.82
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 77266 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.7732 to 278.1783 deg, Dec -7.7395 to +3.7731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.7732 to 278.1783 deg, Dec -7.7395 to 3.7731 deg
Loaded 6323 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4079 out of 4760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4760 out of 77266 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 77640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 261.7550 to 278.1766 deg, Dec -7.7392 to +3.7673 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 261.7550 to 278.1766 deg, Dec -7.7392 to 3.7673 deg
Loaded 6321 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4094 out of 4757 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4757 out of 77640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 54 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.0 pix Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
2.6 pix fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
2.6 pix fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
14.8 mag. Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.NAcsVxHnA2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=4817, passed=77247
Got 77247 stars (including 72311 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77247 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75605 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.376 n_q1=198 n_q2=154 n_q3=300 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kH8xVNBfRd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4938, passed=77627
Got 77627 stars (including 72566 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77627 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits N_match=911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=194 n_q2=152 n_q3=296 n_q4=269 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits -region wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9gEQu7bM45 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=3654, passed=47629
Got 47629 stars (including 43909 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47629 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits N_match=909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.681 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.946 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.929 n_q1=329 n_q2=261 n_q3=164 n_q4=155 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.390
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4Moz5Gsmao (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=3403, passed=45212
Got 45212 stars (including 41758 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45212 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 908 stars left (next iteration limit 998)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits N_match=908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.683 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.927 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.547 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.972 n_q1=325 n_q2=261 n_q3=167 n_q4=155 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.424
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-46-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1335.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_062832_TTUQ2b1x1_134738_sB4QKZNf/wcs_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:49:13.28 -05:22:06.9: 13.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:57:14.92 +00:49:06.9: 13.77 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:58:48.33 -04:38:56.9: 13.86 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:02:18.68 -02:22:42.3: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:49:13.28 -05:22:06.9: 13.26 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:49:13.28 -05:22:06.9: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2877 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:57:14.92 +00:49:06.9: 13.65 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:58:48.33 -04:38:56.9: 13.84 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:02:18.68 -02:22:42.3: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:57:14.92 +00:49:06.9: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6263 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:58:48.33 -04:38:56.9: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8940 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:02:18.68 -02:22:42.3: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8817 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:14:56.78 +02:09:40.9: 14.40 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:00:57.20 +01:36:43.3: 14.94 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:05:48.55 -00:43:04.8: 14.63 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:03:10.85 +01:32:13.5: 15.03 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:16:49.94 +00:39:39.7: 14.18 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:15:43.60 -00:02:34.6: 15.09 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:14:56.78 +02:09:40.9: 14.70 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:05:48.55 -00:43:04.8: 14.64 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:14:56.78 +02:09:40.9: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7911 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:05:48.55 -00:43:04.8: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7423 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:03:10.85 +01:32:13.5: 15.04 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:47:19.86 -05:09:38.7: 14.91 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:03:10.85 +01:32:13.5: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.9004 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:52:15.61 +01:20:12.6: 14.56 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:49:11.60 -03:26:39.8: 14.58 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:16:49.94 +00:39:39.7: 14.37 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:51:42.14 +01:11:36.7: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:16:49.94 +00:39:39.7: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9792 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:00:57.20 +01:36:43.3: 14.90 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:00:57.20 +01:36:43.3: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.8129 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:15:43.60 -00:02:34.6: 14.83 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:15:43.60 -00:02:34.6: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.9989 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:47:19.86 -05:09:38.7: 14.76 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:52:15.61 +01:20:12.6: 14.62 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:47:19.86 -05:09:38.7: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.9173 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:51:42.14 +01:11:36.7: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:49:11.60 -03:26:39.8: 14.94 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:52:15.61 +01:20:12.6: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8798 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:49:11.60 -03:26:39.8: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8095 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:17:34.36 -00:31:55.2: 14.71 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 18:14:23.86 -04:49:33.0: 14.59 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:17:34.36 -00:31:55.2: 15.04 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 18:14:23.86 -04:49:33.0: 14.53 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:17:34.36 -00:31:55.2: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.3059 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:14:23.86 -04:49:33.0: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3036 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:50:13.79 -00:13:54.3: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:43:03.02 +01:35:33.4: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:50:13.79 -00:13:54.3: 15.03 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:50:13.79 -00:13:54.3: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0974 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:43:03.02 +01:35:33.4: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:55:24.53 +00:09:45.3: 14.11 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:51:51.97 -05:01:17.4: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:46:01.09 +00:39:29.1: 13.86 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:43:16.10 -03:53:29.2: 10.35 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:55:24.53 +00:09:45.3: 13.99 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:42:30.97 +02:09:37.0: 12.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:55:24.53 +00:09:45.3: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.1463 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-28-16_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 17:43:19.42 -03:30:19.5: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:51:51.97 -05:01:17.4: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:51:51.97 -05:01:17.4: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0748 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:46:01.09 +00:39:29.1: 13.68 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:46:01.09 +00:39:29.1: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.7863 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:43:16.10 -03:53:29.2: 10.34 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.34 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:43:16.10 -03:53:29.2: ref_mag=10.34 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.2943 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:42:30.97 +02:09:37.0: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-10_02-29-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0164.fits at 17:43:19.42 -03:30:19.5: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:42:30.97 +02:09:37.0: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.9443 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:43:19.42 -03:30:19.5: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2284 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101630.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101742.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101760.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out102440.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103033.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102481.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out10680.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out15221.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out17439.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out46827.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out50012.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94439_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 94439_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94440_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 94440_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94447_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 94447_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94454_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 94454_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94455_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 94455_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:01.30 +01:00:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94458_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 94458_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:59.63 +02:14:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94459_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 94459_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96947_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 96947_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:35.69 -02:15:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97000_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 97000_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:06.45 -02:32:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97777_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 97777_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:38.43 +00:52:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98305_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 98305_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:31.23 +00:59:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98315_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 98315_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:10.39 +00:04:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98369_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 98369_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:42.09 +01:22:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98562_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 98562_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:37.60 -02:14:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99411_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 99411_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:59.57 +00:03:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100396_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 100396_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:35.53 -03:55:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100426_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 100426_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:11.73 -05:30:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100512_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 100512_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:03.87 -00:35:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100611_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 100611_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:33.80 -05:58:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100659_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 100659_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:16.94 -00:28:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100714_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 100714_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:57.91 +00:18:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100873_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 100873_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:59.85 -04:10:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100916_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 100916_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101126_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 101126_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101205_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 101205_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101266_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 101266_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:05.80 -01:37:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101481_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 101481_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:49.96 -01:45:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101630_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 101630_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:57.20 +01:36:43.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.164 4468033007495649536 270.23825220522 +01.61234083461 12.3449 10.8263 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.164#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101742_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 101742_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:43.60 -00:02:34.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.00, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.98)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.881 4274809124698315648 273.93211389301 -00.04267445890 14.0659 12.4315 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.881#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101746_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 101746_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:59.48 -04:24:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101760_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 101760_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:10.85 +01:32:13.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.177 4467832380985239808 270.79525510406 +01.53709834646 12.7316 11.2764 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.177#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101798_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 101798_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101983_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 101983_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102217_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 102217_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102440_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 102440_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:19.86 -05:09:38.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.177 4175362936531022080 266.83209217117 -05.16134113519 12.3754 10.7572 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.177#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102481_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
Preparing report for the candidate 102481_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102743_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 102743_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102845_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 102845_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102914_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 102914_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:06.37 -05:27:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102930_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 102930_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103033_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 103033_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:03.02 +01:35:33.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.03, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.01)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.780 4375838304667968384 265.76164691603 +01.59355286767 12.3597 10.6470 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.780#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87647_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 87647_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:45.30 -01:31:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49459_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 49459_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:00.21 +00:32:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23120_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 23120_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:52.79 -02:25:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46908_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 46908_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:47.43 +01:59:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88241_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 88241_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:59.47 +01:37:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49806_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 49806_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:22.78 +00:34:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74157_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 74157_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10680_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
Preparing report for the candidate 10680_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75283_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336
The candidate 75283_fd_Ser-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-47-31_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1336 did not pass the final checks
