This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.4352 2461177.9352 12.41 15:41:59.61 +01:34:21.8
8.27066 41.83415 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.173 Ino 2 -1 2 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:41:59.61 +01:34:21.8: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:41:59.61 +01:34:21.8: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 17.4352* 15 41 59.61 +01 34 21.8 12.4 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.9352,12.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.4352 12.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.4352 2461177.9352 12.77 15:00:57.70 -05:25:58.2
351.67809 44.83376 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.498 Tokio 2 -0 2 12.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:00:57.70 -05:25:58.2: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:00:57.70 -05:25:58.2: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.9352,12.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.4352 12.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461059.01719699 18.01.2026 12:24:35.820 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
First image: 2461059.01719699 18.01.2026 12:24:35.820 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Last image: 2461177.93546009 17.05.2026 10:26:53.752 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.80
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6481
Objects passed selection criteria: 6481
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6104.25
Average stars matched: 6022.25 (98.6567 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112372 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 17 05:45:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461059.01719699 18.01.2026 12:24:35.820 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
First image: 2461059.01719699 18.01.2026 12:24:35.820 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Last image: 2461177.93546009 17.05.2026 10:26:53.752 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 44
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 41707
Objects passed selection criteria: 41626
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 38560
Average stars matched: 37641.8 (97.6186 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 143460 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun May 17 05:48:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461177.93488059
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.902 -01:59:27.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:31.072 -01:58:58.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.902 -01:59:27.52
Second-epoch image center 15:25:31.072 -01:58:58.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0540 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:33.457 -01:59:37.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.902 -01:59:27.52
Second-epoch image center 15:25:33.457 -01:59:37.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0436 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:31.072 -01:58:58.55
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:33.457 -01:59:37.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01466 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OUn6Gk69Cz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4gmtPmDhvw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits &> /tmp/tmp.x3H8yZyL7k
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits &> /tmp/tmp.99jwrGNvMT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5366 to 239.3536 deg, Dec -7.2904 to +3.3083 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5366 to 239.3536 deg, Dec -7.2904 to 3.3083 deg
Loaded 4433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3882 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3882 out of 7163 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.882000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.882000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.80
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.08
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.08
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5366 to 239.3536 deg, Dec -7.2904 to +3.3083 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5366 to 239.3536 deg, Dec -7.2904 to 3.3083 deg
Loaded 4433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3702 out of 3882 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3882 out of 7163 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 6302 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5176 to 239.3462 deg, Dec -7.3035 to +3.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5176 to 239.3462 deg, Dec -7.3035 to 3.2884 deg
Loaded 4440 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3648 out of 3812 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3812 out of 6302 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.3 pix Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
2.7 pix fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
2.7 pix fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
14.9 mag. Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.OUn6Gk69Cz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=576, passed=7163
Got 7163 stars (including 6581 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7163 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7111 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.221 n_q1=214 n_q2=242 n_q3=239 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.196
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4gmtPmDhvw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=467, passed=6302
Got 6302 stars (including 5831 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6302 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6256 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.279 n_q1=222 n_q2=240 n_q3=243 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.x3H8yZyL7k (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=239, passed=5585
Got 5585 stars (including 5339 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5585 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.228 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.364 n_q1=270 n_q2=235 n_q3=246 n_q4=215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.202
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.99jwrGNvMT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=270, passed=5548
Got 5548 stars (including 5274 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5548 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5509 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5509 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5509 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=271 n_q2=234 n_q3=247 n_q4=215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits sigma_overall=0.255 worst_q_ratio=1.196
ref2=Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits sigma_overall=0.354 worst_q_ratio=1.145
new1=fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits sigma_overall=0.303 worst_q_ratio=1.202
new2=fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits sigma_overall=0.306 worst_q_ratio=1.141
reference average sigma_overall=0.3045 worst_q_ratio=1.1705
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20147_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 20147_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:35.31 +02:06:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20233_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 20233_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:12:47.95 -06:05:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00961_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 00961_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:11:41.30 -06:00:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.902 -01:59:27.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:31.072 -01:58:58.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.902 -01:59:27.52
Second-epoch image center 15:25:31.072 -01:58:58.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0540 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:33.457 -01:59:37.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.902 -01:59:27.52
Second-epoch image center 15:25:33.457 -01:59:37.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0436 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:31.072 -01:58:58.55
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:33.457 -01:59:37.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01466 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u4M5OBPGVo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vp3ZhT7tHM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ChfDdMqeSI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KIq2zQ1O3V
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits and wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 46653 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5338 to 239.3761 deg, Dec -7.2904 to +3.3116 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5338 to 239.3761 deg, Dec -7.2904 to 3.3116 deg
Loaded 4445 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3595 out of 3963 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3963 out of 46653 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.755200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.755200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 46653 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5338 to 239.3761 deg, Dec -7.2904 to +3.3116 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5338 to 239.3761 deg, Dec -7.2904 to 3.3116 deg
Loaded 4445 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3595 out of 3963 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3963 out of 46653 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 41513 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.5174 to 239.3605 deg, Dec -7.3041 to +3.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.5174 to 239.3605 deg, Dec -7.3041 to 3.2945 deg
Loaded 4445 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3614 out of 3966 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3966 out of 41513 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 43 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.2 pix Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
2.5 pix fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
2.5 pix fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
15.0 mag. Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.u4M5OBPGVo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=8, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1904, passed=46633
Got 46633 stars (including 44634 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46633 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.233 n_q1=212 n_q2=244 n_q3=235 n_q4=276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vp3ZhT7tHM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1690, passed=41498
Got 41498 stars (including 39727 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41498 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=215 n_q2=243 n_q3=237 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits -region wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ChfDdMqeSI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=999, passed=33765
Got 33765 stars (including 32714 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33765 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.226 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=274 n_q2=234 n_q3=246 n_q4=210 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.190
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KIq2zQ1O3V (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1119, passed=33538
Got 33538 stars (including 32366 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33538 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.351 n_q1=272 n_q2=233 n_q3=247 n_q4=212 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0468.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-17_CI_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_054019_TTUQ1b1x1_3563866_bqPa4fQw/wcs_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:28:38.69 +00:26:27.8: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:43:05.15 -01:30:27.6: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:09:31.04 +01:49:04.8: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:35:44.16 -02:12:27.8: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:41:59.61 +01:34:21.8: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:34:15.82 +01:20:50.5: 11.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:24:59.51 +01:43:27.4: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:00:57.70 -05:25:58.2: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:13:20.94 +01:53:00.4: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:09:31.04 +01:49:04.8: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:41:59.61 +01:34:21.8: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:28:38.69 +00:26:27.8: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:34:15.82 +01:20:50.5: 11.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:24:59.51 +01:43:27.4: 14.04 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:00:57.70 -05:25:58.2: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:43:05.15 -01:30:27.6: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:09:31.04 +01:49:04.8: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6224 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:28:38.69 +00:26:27.8: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9963 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:35:44.16 -02:12:27.8: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:34:15.82 +01:20:50.5: ref_mag=11.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0640 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:24:59.51 +01:43:27.4: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2836 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:05.15 -01:30:27.6: ref_mag=11.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8219 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:44.16 -02:12:27.8: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1305 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:08:31.81 -00:59:07.5: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:13:20.94 +01:53:00.4: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:13:20.94 +01:53:00.4: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1535 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:08:31.81 -00:59:07.5: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:08:31.81 -00:59:07.5: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3855 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:37:28.60 -04:25:36.6: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:18:08.22 +00:47:37.2: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 14:58:33.71 -06:24:55.0: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:25:49.52 -01:15:43.0: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:54:45.15 -06:22:22.2: 13.66 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:49:39.77 +02:41:09.9: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:39:45.99 -00:56:17.7: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:18:08.22 +00:47:37.2: 13.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:54:45.15 -06:22:22.2: 13.60 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:08.22 +00:47:37.2: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6422 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:45.15 -06:22:22.2: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6405 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:37:28.60 -04:25:36.6: 13.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 14:58:33.71 -06:24:55.0: 13.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:49:39.77 +02:41:09.9: 13.48 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:25:49.52 -01:15:43.0: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:33.71 -06:24:55.0: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3809 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:37:28.60 -04:25:36.6: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7396 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:39.77 +02:41:09.9: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8711 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:25:49.52 -01:15:43.0: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6985 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:39:45.99 -00:56:17.7: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:39:45.99 -00:56:17.7: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8982 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:56:21.38 -01:12:14.1: 13.63 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:56:21.38 -01:12:14.1: 14.20 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:51:13.32 -00:06:22.0: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:44:06.32 +02:48:41.3: 14.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:54:34.64 +01:03:08.1: 14.67 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:48:30.85 +01:06:24.9: 15.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:49:09.50 -01:54:10.3: 14.60 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:21.38 -01:12:14.1: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0726 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:48:08.88 +02:16:28.3: 14.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:53:32.35 -01:43:04.3: 14.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:54:34.64 +01:03:08.1: 15.03 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:49:09.50 -01:54:10.3: 14.63 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:51:13.32 -00:06:22.0: 14.89 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:48:30.85 +01:06:24.9: 14.91 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:34.64 +01:03:08.1: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4123 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:13.32 -00:06:22.0: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3763 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:09.50 -01:54:10.3: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4600 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:30.85 +01:06:24.9: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4734 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:44:06.32 +02:48:41.3: 14.77 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:06.32 +02:48:41.3: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5247 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:48:08.88 +02:16:28.3: 14.67 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:53:32.35 -01:43:04.3: 14.47 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:08.88 +02:16:28.3: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6453 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:32.35 -01:43:04.3: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7079 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:49:29.84 +02:29:15.2: 14.91 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:49:29.84 +02:29:15.2: 14.75 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:47:35.07 -00:41:03.4: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:50:08.00 +01:06:33.1: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:51:25.15 +01:46:44.2: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:42:29.72 -02:55:27.9: 14.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:29.84 +02:29:15.2: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5595 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:52:10.17 +02:28:13.5: 15.26 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:49:09.62 +01:37:32.0: 15.13 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:36:38.11 -00:45:40.8: 15.39 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:51:25.15 +01:46:44.2: 14.52 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:47:35.07 -00:41:03.4: 14.56 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:50:08.00 +01:06:33.1: 14.99 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:42:29.72 -02:55:27.9: 15.20 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:35.07 -00:41:03.4: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6371 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:25.15 +01:46:44.2: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6333 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:29.72 -02:55:27.9: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6110 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:08.00 +01:06:33.1: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7114 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:52:10.17 +02:28:13.5: 14.69 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:10.17 +02:28:13.5: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6122 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:49:09.62 +01:37:32.0: 14.74 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:09.62 +01:37:32.0: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7261 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:36:38.11 -00:45:40.8: 15.21 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:38.11 -00:45:40.8: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.6120 delta=0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:23:04.11 +03:09:32.1: 14.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:44:19.25 +00:21:54.0: 15.09 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_06-24-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 15:44:12.95 -04:38:36.8: 14.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:23:04.11 +03:09:32.1: 14.75 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:23:04.11 +03:09:32.1: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6762 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:44:19.25 +00:21:54.0: 14.94 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_03-01-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0433.fits at 15:44:12.95 -04:38:36.8: 14.62 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:19.25 +00:21:54.0: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6123 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:12.95 -04:38:36.8: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6171 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51954.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52139.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51741_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 51741_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51742_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 51742_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51744_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 51744_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51748_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 51748_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51749_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 51749_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51750_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 51750_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51808_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 51808_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:35.30 +02:06:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51954_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 51954_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52094_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52094_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:14:57.73 -05:31:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52139_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 52139_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52226_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52226_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52236_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52236_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:28.00 -00:08:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52347_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52347_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52367_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52367_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52394_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52394_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52397_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52397_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52403_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52403_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52410_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52410_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52426_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52426_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52547_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52547_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52575_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52575_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52586_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52586_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52642_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52642_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:09:50.09 -02:24:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52733_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52733_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52743_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52743_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52839_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52839_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52844_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52844_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52845_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52845_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52881_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52881_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52883_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52883_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52886_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52886_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52907_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52907_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52924_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52924_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52928_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52928_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52939_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52939_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52942_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52942_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52954_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52954_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52960_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52960_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52971_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52971_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52994_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 52994_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53000_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 53000_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05382_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 05382_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:12:47.96 -06:05:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05579_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469
The candidate 05579_fd_Ser-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_05-26-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0469 did not pass the final checks