This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1737 2461177.6737 10.44 11:39:22.57 +02:03:05.2
265.34224 59.55717 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.20 Massalia -1 0 1 10.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:39:22.57 +02:03:05.2: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:39:22.57 +02:03:05.2: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 17.1737* 11 39 22.57 +02 03 05.2 10.4 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6737,10.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1737 10.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1737 2461177.6737 13.15 11:09:31.14 +01:26:53.0
255.06327 54.55693 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.120 Lachesis -2 1 3 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:09:31.14 +01:26:53.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:09:31.14 +01:26:53.0: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 17.1737* 11 09 31.14 +01 26 53.0 13.2 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6737,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1737 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1737 2461177.6737 14.02 10:42:34.51 +00:45:24.6
247.98531 49.36990 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.420 Bertholda -2 2 3 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:42:34.51 +00:45:24.6: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:42:34.51 +00:45:24.6: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 17.1737* 10 42 34.51 +00 45 24.6 14.0 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6737,14.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1737 14.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1737 2461177.6737 14.29 11:38:23.35 -05:04:17.8
271.46360 53.27774 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.193 Ambrosia -1 -0 1 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:38:23.35 -05:04:17.8: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:38:23.35 -05:04:17.8: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 17.1737* 11 38 23.35 -05 04 17.8 14.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6737,14.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1737 14.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461139.72774068 09.04.2026 05:27:46.795 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
First image: 2461139.72774068 09.04.2026 05:27:46.795 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Last image: 2461177.67390382 17.05.2026 04:10:15.290 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.71
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6252
Objects passed selection criteria: 6248
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5884.75
Average stars matched: 5697.75 (96.8223 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111888 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 23:14:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461139.72774068 09.04.2026 05:27:46.795 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
First image: 2461139.72774068 09.04.2026 05:27:46.795 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Last image: 2461177.67390382 17.05.2026 04:10:15.290 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 41
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 31516
Objects passed selection criteria: 31441
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 29298.8
Average stars matched: 28028.8 (95.6653 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 133744 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 23:15:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461177.67346487
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits'
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.754 -02:02:18.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27
Second-epoch image center 11:08:34.754 -02:02:18.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0393 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:37.083 -02:02:16.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27
Second-epoch image center 11:08:37.083 -02:02:16.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0403 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:34.754 -02:02:18.78
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:37.083 -02:02:16.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00971 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OYVJ2BIEo4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.efNqEhblmh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KSzYvtN6uY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nGAp6soYnD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6012 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2431 to 175.0483 deg, Dec -7.3132 to +3.3154 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2431 to 175.0483 deg, Dec -7.3132 to 3.3154 deg
Loaded 3840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3221 out of 3325 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3325 out of 6012 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.770800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.770800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.71
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6012 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2431 to 175.0483 deg, Dec -7.3132 to +3.3154 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2431 to 175.0483 deg, Dec -7.3132 to 3.3154 deg
Loaded 3840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3221 out of 3325 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3325 out of 6012 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 6113 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2432 to 175.0831 deg, Dec -7.3134 to +3.3569 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2432 to 175.0831 deg, Dec -7.3134 to 3.3569 deg
Loaded 3866 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3207 out of 3328 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3328 out of 6113 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
2.4 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
3.3 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
3.3 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
15.1 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.OYVJ2BIEo4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=410, passed=6012
Got 6012 stars (including 5599 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6012 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.630 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.550 n_q1=220 n_q2=241 n_q3=237 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.461
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.efNqEhblmh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=438, passed=6113
Got 6113 stars (including 5671 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6113 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.594 n_q1=219 n_q2=240 n_q3=231 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.301
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KSzYvtN6uY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, passed=5856
Got 5856 stars (including 5573 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5856 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=225 n_q2=213 n_q3=254 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.210
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nGAp6soYnD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=255, passed=5765
Got 5765 stars (including 5505 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5765 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 469 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 469 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=225 n_q2=209 n_q3=259 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits sigma_overall=0.431 worst_q_ratio=1.461
ref2=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits sigma_overall=0.456 worst_q_ratio=1.301
new1=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits sigma_overall=0.330 worst_q_ratio=1.210
new2=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits sigma_overall=0.325 worst_q_ratio=1.203
reference average sigma_overall=0.4435 worst_q_ratio=1.381
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187_astrometric_residuals.png (945 matched stars from wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094_astrometric_residuals.png (945 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:10:16.88 -02:14:59.4: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:37:43.80 +02:11:18.0: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:06:10.98 -02:25:16.4: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:05:39.61 -01:23:26.2: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:39:22.57 +02:03:05.2: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:06:10.98 -02:25:16.4: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:10:16.88 -02:14:59.4: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:37:43.80 +02:11:18.0: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:39:22.57 +02:03:05.2: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:05:39.61 -01:23:26.2: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:06:10.98 -02:25:16.4: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2263 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:37:43.80 +02:11:18.0: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9159 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:16.88 -02:14:59.4: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1886 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:05:39.61 -01:23:26.2: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1959 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20386.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20386_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 20386_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20495_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 20495_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20524_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 20524_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20527_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 20527_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20533_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 20533_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:39:22.57 +02:03:05.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.754 -02:02:18.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27
Second-epoch image center 11:08:34.754 -02:02:18.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0393 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:37.083 -02:02:16.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27
Second-epoch image center 11:08:37.083 -02:02:16.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0403 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:34.754 -02:02:18.78
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:37.083 -02:02:16.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00971 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits &> /tmp/tmp.c832DT0QQn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MG9mP79ykn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LvtKSkL1oC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HGhJ6PqXve
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2432 to 175.0929 deg, Dec -7.3132 to +3.3410 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2432 to 175.0929 deg, Dec -7.3132 to 3.3410 deg
Loaded 3861 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3105 out of 3362 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3362 out of 31985 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.652600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.652600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 31985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2432 to 175.0929 deg, Dec -7.3132 to +3.3410 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2432 to 175.0929 deg, Dec -7.3132 to 3.3410 deg
Loaded 3861 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3105 out of 3362 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3362 out of 31985 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 33877 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2320 to 175.0870 deg, Dec -7.3180 to +3.3671 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2320 to 175.0870 deg, Dec -7.3180 to 3.3671 deg
Loaded 3877 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3086 out of 3367 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3367 out of 33877 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 35 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
2.2 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
3.1 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
3.1 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.c832DT0QQn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1557, passed=31965
Got 31965 stars (including 30362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31965 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31588 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31588 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.616 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.539 n_q1=221 n_q2=231 n_q3=239 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.451
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MG9mP79ykn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=1524, passed=33848
Got 33848 stars (including 32278 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33848 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33524 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33524 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.570 n_q1=216 n_q2=238 n_q3=228 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LvtKSkL1oC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=864, passed=26475
Got 26475 stars (including 25575 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26475 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.349 n_q1=224 n_q2=210 n_q3=258 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HGhJ6PqXve (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=848, passed=25859
Got 25859 stars (including 24969 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25859 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25665 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=227 n_q2=207 n_q3=257 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.229
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:33:58.44 -07:05:21.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:40:39.73 +00:06:51.7: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:40:05.39 +03:01:29.0: 13.77 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:09:31.14 +01:26:53.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:38:11.66 -06:32:51.2: 14.25 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:40:15.54 -05:29:37.3: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:40:04.43 -01:44:52.7: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:39:22.74 -06:29:51.8: 14.57 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:42:34.51 +00:45:24.6: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:37:41.82 -06:07:25.9: 14.20 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:33:58.44 -07:05:21.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:58.44 -07:05:21.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:39.73 +00:06:51.7: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:09:31.14 +01:26:53.0: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:05.39 +03:01:29.0: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:39.73 +00:06:51.7: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0077 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:05.39 +03:01:29.0: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5993 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:38:11.66 -06:32:51.2: 14.44 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:11.66 -06:32:51.2: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9262 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:04.43 -01:44:52.7: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:15.54 -05:29:37.3: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:39:22.74 -06:29:51.8: 14.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:42:34.51 +00:45:24.6: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:15.54 -05:29:37.3: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0947 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:04.43 -01:44:52.7: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8135 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:39:22.74 -06:29:51.8: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0279 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:37:41.82 -06:07:25.9: 14.09 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:41.82 -06:07:25.9: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.8447 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:42:15.63 +02:37:31.3: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:37:33.20 -04:59:03.5: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:55:19.83 +02:51:21.6: 14.65 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:37:35.70 -05:09:35.6: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:38:23.35 -05:04:17.8: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:37:15.31 -03:49:46.0: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:32:12.05 -01:17:21.5: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:38:19.28 -02:32:33.0: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:42:15.63 +02:37:31.3: 14.40 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:37:33.20 -04:59:03.5: 14.75 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:42:15.63 +02:37:31.3: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1050 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:55:19.83 +02:51:21.6: 14.65 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:33.20 -04:59:03.5: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0955 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:55:19.83 +02:51:21.6: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2546 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:37:35.70 -05:09:35.6: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:35.70 -05:09:35.6: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2533 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:37:15.31 -03:49:46.0: 14.87 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:32:12.05 -01:17:21.5: 14.97 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:38:19.28 -02:32:33.0: 14.66 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:38:23.35 -05:04:17.8: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:37:15.31 -03:49:46.0: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4797 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:32:12.05 -01:17:21.5: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4757 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:19.28 -02:32:33.0: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2331 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:37:32.49 -05:36:48.7: 14.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:40:49.15 -06:25:27.6: 14.41 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:38:46.42 -03:21:38.0: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:36:59.43 -02:37:20.7: 15.09 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:41:00.88 +01:00:31.4: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:41:57.42 -05:51:56.2: 14.10 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:49.15 -06:25:27.6: 14.48 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:37:32.49 -05:36:48.7: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:49.15 -06:25:27.6: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3546 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:32.49 -05:36:48.7: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3244 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:38:46.42 -03:21:38.0: 14.66 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:46.42 -03:21:38.0: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2593 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:36:59.43 -02:37:20.7: 15.05 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:36:59.43 -02:37:20.7: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5695 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:41:00.88 +01:00:31.4: 14.72 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:00.88 +01:00:31.4: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6152 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:41:57.42 -05:51:56.2: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:57.42 -05:51:56.2: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6779 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:39:59.31 -03:46:57.6: 13.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:38:11.25 -03:09:39.9: 13.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:39:59.31 -03:46:57.6: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:39:59.31 -03:46:57.6: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7267 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:38:11.25 -03:09:39.9: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:11.25 -03:09:39.9: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6235 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54149.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54531.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54680.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53738_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53738_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53785_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 53785_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:39:22.58 +02:03:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54023_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54023_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:38:10.51 -06:19:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54121_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54121_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54149_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 54149_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54192_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54192_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:24:33.38 +00:11:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54309_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54309_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:37.65 -00:49:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54349_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54349_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54352_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54352_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:38:10.85 -04:11:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54388_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54388_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:52:36.19 -00:13:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54414_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54414_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54495_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54495_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54531_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 54531_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54535_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54535_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54536_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54536_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54554_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54554_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54573_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54573_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54617_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54617_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54623_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54623_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54658_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54658_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54680_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
Preparing report for the candidate 54680_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54682_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54682_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54683_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54683_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54695_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54695_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54699_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54699_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54714_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54714_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54716_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54716_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54726_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54726_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54796_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 54796_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28939_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 28939_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:57:44.95 -04:33:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50034_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 50034_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02578_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 02578_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:39:25.49 +02:11:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22128_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 22128_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21662_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 21662_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:38:40.41 -05:54:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23417_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095
The candidate 23417_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks