NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Leo-08-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    10.46    11:39:22.56 +02:03:05.2   0266 0424   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    10.42    11:39:22.58 +02:03:05.3   0272 0425   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 17.1737  2461177.6737  10.44  11:39:22.57 +02:03:05.2
265.34224  59.55717 galactic  Vir  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.0 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
20 Massalia                -1      0       1  10.7     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:39:22.57 +02:03:05.2:  15.27 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:39:22.57 +02:03:05.2:  15.34 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-08-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    13.15    11:09:31.14 +01:26:53.5   4778 1088   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    13.15    11:09:31.14 +01:26:52.4   4784 1089   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 17.1737  2461177.6737  13.15  11:09:31.14 +01:26:53.0
255.06327  54.55693 galactic  Leo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 5.9 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
120 Lachesis                -2      1       3  13.1    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:09:31.14 +01:26:53.0:  15.83 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:09:31.14 +01:26:53.0:  15.97 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-08-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    14.01    10:42:34.52 +00:45:24.4   8829 1752   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    14.02    10:42:34.49 +00:45:24.7   8835 1752   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 17.1737  2461177.6737  14.02  10:42:34.51 +00:45:24.6
247.98531  49.36990 galactic  Sex  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.0 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
420 Bertholda               -2      2       3  14.2     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:42:34.51 +00:45:24.6:  15.78 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:42:34.51 +00:45:24.6:  15.86 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-08-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    14.33    11:38:23.31 -05:04:16.8   0170 4770   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    14.26    11:38:23.39 -05:04:18.7   0175 4771   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 17.1737  2461177.6737  14.29  11:38:23.35 -05:04:17.8
271.46360  53.27774 galactic  Vir  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 5.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
193 Ambrosia                -1     -0       1  14.7    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:38:23.35 -05:04:17.8:  15.46 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:38:23.35 -05:04:17.8:  15.52 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Leo-08-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 4

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-08-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-08-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-08-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 523211 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 523211 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits_preview.png'
Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits

renamed 'Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits_preview.png'
Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 654.4630 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 463.3422 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1180.1080 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 482.6833 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1184.2971 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 479.6610 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.80317 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.006 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 27.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-16T23:09:37.3654326' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-17T04:09:37.3654326' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61177.1733491318 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-17T04:09:47.2702479' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61177.173463773 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 167.139192599347 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -1.99962041045193 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 45.5058333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 221.905833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.40055939766583 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-08' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 08 34' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-02 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29444 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29444 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 44.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 891.7 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 27.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 36.702936 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 23.801904 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/d_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits :) Spent 0.508303 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/d_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 28856.430799 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18844.5, right_median=21297.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 27.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-16T23:10:15.2906392' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-17T04:10:15.2906392' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61177.1737880786 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-17T04:10:25.1924416' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61177.1739026853 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 167.13919260445 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -1.9996204085952 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 45.4175 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 222.093888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.40267818408961 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-08' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 08 34' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-02 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29444 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29444 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 44.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 891.7 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 27.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 36.702936 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 23.801904 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/d_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits :) Spent 0.492572 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/d_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 28856.430799 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18844.5, right_median=21297.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits


fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461177.67346487 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:08:34.754 -02:02:18.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27 Second-epoch image center 11:08:34.754 -02:02:18.78 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0393 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:08:37.083 -02:02:16.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27 Second-epoch image center 11:08:37.083 -02:02:16.94 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0403 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:08:34.754 -02:02:18.78 Second-epoch second image center 11:08:37.083 -02:02:16.94 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00971 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OYVJ2BIEo4 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.efNqEhblmh Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KSzYvtN6uY Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nGAp6soYnD Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6012 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2431 to 175.0483 deg, Dec -7.3132 to +3.3154 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2431 to 175.0483 deg, Dec -7.3132 to 3.3154 deg Loaded 3840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3221 out of 3325 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3325 out of 6012 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.770800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.770800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.71 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6012 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2431 to 175.0483 deg, Dec -7.3132 to +3.3154 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2431 to 175.0483 deg, Dec -7.3132 to 3.3154 deg Loaded 3840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3221 out of 3325 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3325 out of 6012 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits (aperture=6.6) Read 6113 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2432 to 175.0831 deg, Dec -7.3134 to +3.3569 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2432 to 175.0831 deg, Dec -7.3134 to 3.3569 deg Loaded 3866 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3207 out of 3328 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3328 out of 6113 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (aperture=6.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits 2.4 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 3.3 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 3.3 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits 2.4 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits 2.4 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.1 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits 15.1 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.OYVJ2BIEo4 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=410, passed=6012 Got 6012 stars (including 5599 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6012 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5953 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5952 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5952 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.630 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.550 n_q1=220 n_q2=241 n_q3=237 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.461 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.efNqEhblmh (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=438, passed=6113 Got 6113 stars (including 5671 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6113 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6061 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6058 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6058 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.594 n_q1=219 n_q2=240 n_q3=231 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.301 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.KSzYvtN6uY (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, passed=5856 Got 5856 stars (including 5573 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5856 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5798 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5798 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5798 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=225 n_q2=213 n_q3=254 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.210 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.nGAp6soYnD (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=255, passed=5765 Got 5765 stars (including 5505 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5765 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 469 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5688 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 469 (Dec -7.7 to 3.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5687 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5687 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.391 n_q1=225 n_q2=209 n_q3=259 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits sigma_overall=0.431 worst_q_ratio=1.461 ref2=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits sigma_overall=0.456 worst_q_ratio=1.301 new1=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits sigma_overall=0.330 worst_q_ratio=1.210 new2=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits sigma_overall=0.325 worst_q_ratio=1.203 reference average sigma_overall=0.4435 worst_q_ratio=1.381 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187_astrometric_residuals.png (945 matched stars from wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094_astrometric_residuals.png (945 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:10:16.88 -02:14:59.4: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:37:43.80 +02:11:18.0: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:06:10.98 -02:25:16.4: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:05:39.61 -01:23:26.2: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:39:22.57 +02:03:05.2: 15.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:06:10.98 -02:25:16.4: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:10:16.88 -02:14:59.4: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:37:43.80 +02:11:18.0: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:39:22.57 +02:03:05.2: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:05:39.61 -01:23:26.2: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:06:10.98 -02:25:16.4: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2263 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:37:43.80 +02:11:18.0: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9159 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:16.88 -02:14:59.4: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1886 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:05:39.61 -01:23:26.2: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1959 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20386.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20386_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 Preparing report for the candidate 20386_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20495_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 20495_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    11.92    11:37:43.79 +02:11:18.1   0525 0358   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    11.92    11:37:43.81 +02:11:17.8   0531 0359   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20524_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 20524_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    12.19    11:05:39.61 -01:23:26.2   5251 2833   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    12.20    11:05:39.61 -01:23:26.2   5257 2834   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20527_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 20527_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    12.19    11:10:16.88 -02:14:59.4   4525 3306   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    12.19    11:10:16.89 -02:14:59.4   4531 3307   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20533_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 20533_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    12.23    11:06:11.00 -02:25:16.2   5134 3447   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    12.23    11:06:10.96 -02:25:16.6   5140 3448   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 11:39:22.57 +02:03:05.2 wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:08:34.754 -02:02:18.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27 Second-epoch image center 11:08:34.754 -02:02:18.78 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0393 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:08:37.083 -02:02:16.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:08:34.462 -01:59:57.27 Second-epoch image center 11:08:37.083 -02:02:16.94 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0403 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:08:34.754 -02:02:18.78 Second-epoch second image center 11:08:37.083 -02:02:16.94 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00971 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits &> /tmp/tmp.c832DT0QQn Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MG9mP79ykn Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LvtKSkL1oC Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HGhJ6PqXve Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 31985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2432 to 175.0929 deg, Dec -7.3132 to +3.3410 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2432 to 175.0929 deg, Dec -7.3132 to 3.3410 deg Loaded 3861 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3105 out of 3362 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3362 out of 31985 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.652600 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.652600 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 31985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2432 to 175.0929 deg, Dec -7.3132 to +3.3410 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2432 to 175.0929 deg, Dec -7.3132 to 3.3410 deg Loaded 3861 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3105 out of 3362 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3362 out of 31985 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits (aperture=5.1) Read 33877 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2320 to 175.0870 deg, Dec -7.3180 to +3.3671 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2320 to 175.0870 deg, Dec -7.3180 to 3.3671 deg Loaded 3877 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3086 out of 3367 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3367 out of 33877 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (aperture=5.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 35 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits 2.2 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 3.1 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 3.1 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits 15.3 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.c832DT0QQn (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1557, passed=31965 Got 31965 stars (including 30362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31965 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31589 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31588 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31588 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.616 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.539 n_q1=221 n_q2=231 n_q3=239 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.451 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.MG9mP79ykn (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=1524, passed=33848 Got 33848 stars (including 32278 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33848 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33525 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33524 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33524 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.570 n_q1=216 n_q2=238 n_q3=228 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.LvtKSkL1oC (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=864, passed=26475 Got 26475 stars (including 25575 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26475 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26287 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26286 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26286 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.349 n_q1=224 n_q2=210 n_q3=258 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.HGhJ6PqXve (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=848, passed=25859 Got 25859 stars (including 24969 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25859 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25665 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25666 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25666 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.396 n_q1=227 n_q2=207 n_q3=257 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.229 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:33:58.44 -07:05:21.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:40:39.73 +00:06:51.7: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:40:05.39 +03:01:29.0: 13.77 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:09:31.14 +01:26:53.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:38:11.66 -06:32:51.2: 14.25 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:40:15.54 -05:29:37.3: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:40:04.43 -01:44:52.7: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:39:22.74 -06:29:51.8: 14.57 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:42:34.51 +00:45:24.6: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:37:41.82 -06:07:25.9: 14.20 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:33:58.44 -07:05:21.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:58.44 -07:05:21.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:39.73 +00:06:51.7: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:09:31.14 +01:26:53.0: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:05.39 +03:01:29.0: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:39.73 +00:06:51.7: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0077 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:05.39 +03:01:29.0: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5993 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:38:11.66 -06:32:51.2: 14.44 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:11.66 -06:32:51.2: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9262 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:04.43 -01:44:52.7: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:15.54 -05:29:37.3: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:39:22.74 -06:29:51.8: 14.74 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:42:34.51 +00:45:24.6: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:15.54 -05:29:37.3: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0947 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:04.43 -01:44:52.7: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8135 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:39:22.74 -06:29:51.8: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0279 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:37:41.82 -06:07:25.9: 14.09 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:41.82 -06:07:25.9: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.8447 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:42:15.63 +02:37:31.3: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:37:33.20 -04:59:03.5: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:55:19.83 +02:51:21.6: 14.65 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:37:35.70 -05:09:35.6: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:38:23.35 -05:04:17.8: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:37:15.31 -03:49:46.0: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:32:12.05 -01:17:21.5: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:38:19.28 -02:32:33.0: 14.77 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:42:15.63 +02:37:31.3: 14.40 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:37:33.20 -04:59:03.5: 14.75 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:42:15.63 +02:37:31.3: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1050 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:55:19.83 +02:51:21.6: 14.65 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:33.20 -04:59:03.5: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0955 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:55:19.83 +02:51:21.6: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2546 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:37:35.70 -05:09:35.6: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:35.70 -05:09:35.6: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2533 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:37:15.31 -03:49:46.0: 14.87 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:32:12.05 -01:17:21.5: 14.97 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:38:19.28 -02:32:33.0: 14.66 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:38:23.35 -05:04:17.8: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:37:15.31 -03:49:46.0: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4797 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:32:12.05 -01:17:21.5: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4757 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:19.28 -02:32:33.0: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2331 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:37:32.49 -05:36:48.7: 14.77 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:40:49.15 -06:25:27.6: 14.41 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:38:46.42 -03:21:38.0: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 11:36:59.43 -02:37:20.7: 15.09 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:41:00.88 +01:00:31.4: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:41:57.42 -05:51:56.2: 14.10 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:40:49.15 -06:25:27.6: 14.48 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:37:32.49 -05:36:48.7: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:49.15 -06:25:27.6: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3546 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:32.49 -05:36:48.7: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3244 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:38:46.42 -03:21:38.0: 14.66 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:46.42 -03:21:38.0: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2593 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 11:36:59.43 -02:37:20.7: 15.05 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:36:59.43 -02:37:20.7: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5695 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:41:00.88 +01:00:31.4: 14.72 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:00.88 +01:00:31.4: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6152 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:41:57.42 -05:51:56.2: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:57.42 -05:51:56.2: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6779 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:39:59.31 -03:46:57.6: 13.90 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-27-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits at 10:38:11.25 -03:09:39.9: 13.94 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:39:59.31 -03:46:57.6: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:39:59.31 -03:46:57.6: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7267 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-07-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 10:38:11.25 -03:09:39.9: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:11.25 -03:09:39.9: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6235 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54149.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54531.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54680.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53738_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 53738_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    13.00    10:40:39.76 +00:06:52.9   9096 2159   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    13.02    10:40:39.70 +00:06:50.5   9102 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53785_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 53785_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    10.51    11:39:22.59 +02:03:05.3   0272 0425   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits **** FOUND 11:39:22.58 +02:03:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54023_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54023_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    12.61    10:38:10.55 -06:19:55.2   9225 6106   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits **** FOUND 10:38:10.51 -06:19:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54121_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54121_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    13.09    11:33:58.45 -07:05:21.7   0771 6035   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    13.10    11:33:58.43 -07:05:21.9   0777 6035   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54149_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 Preparing report for the candidate 54149_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54192_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54192_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    13.24    11:24:33.42 +00:11:57.3   2471 1700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits **** FOUND 11:24:33.38 +00:11:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54309_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54309_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    13.65    11:31:37.71 -00:49:12.1   1361 2249   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits **** FOUND 11:31:37.65 -00:49:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54349_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54349_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    13.63    10:40:05.35 +03:01:29.8   9306 0389   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    13.57    10:40:05.43 +03:01:28.2   9312 0390   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54352_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54352_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    13.45    10:38:10.82 -04:11:18.2   9309 4798   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits **** FOUND 10:38:10.85 -04:11:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54388_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54388_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    13.92    10:52:36.21 -00:13:50.7   7268 2258   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits **** FOUND 10:52:36.19 -00:13:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54414_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54414_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    13.80    10:40:04.40 -01:44:52.1   9110 3295   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    13.83    10:40:04.46 -01:44:53.3   9116 3296   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54495_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54495_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    13.93    10:38:11.67 -06:32:51.3   9207 6238   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    13.92    10:38:11.65 -06:32:51.1   9214 6238   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54531_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 Preparing report for the candidate 54531_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54535_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54535_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    14.02    10:40:15.56 -05:29:38.4   8933 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    14.21    10:40:15.51 -05:29:36.3   8939 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54536_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54536_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    14.04    10:39:22.64 -06:29:49.6   9028 6192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    14.02    10:39:22.85 -06:29:54.1   9034 6194   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54554_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54554_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    14.03    10:37:41.80 -06:07:25.9   9301 5984   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    13.74    10:37:41.85 -06:07:25.9   9306 5985   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54573_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54573_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    14.11    10:42:15.65 +02:37:32.5   8955 0616   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    14.11    10:42:15.60 +02:37:30.1   8961 0617   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54617_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54617_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    14.12    10:37:33.24 -04:59:02.4   9368 5289   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    14.08    10:37:33.16 -04:59:04.6   9374 5291   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54623_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54623_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    14.23    10:55:19.88 +02:51:21.5   6972 0365   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    14.28    10:55:19.79 +02:51:21.7   6978 0365   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54658_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54658_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    14.22    10:37:35.72 -05:09:35.3   9354 5396   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    14.30    10:37:35.68 -05:09:35.9   9360 5397   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54680_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 Preparing report for the candidate 54680_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54682_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54682_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    14.46    11:32:12.04 -01:17:22.4   1252 2527   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    14.50    11:32:12.07 -01:17:20.6   1258 2528   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54683_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54683_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    14.46    11:37:15.34 -03:49:45.2   0388 4023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    14.52    11:37:15.27 -03:49:46.8   0395 4024   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54695_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54695_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    14.30    10:38:19.25 -02:32:32.3   9347 3795   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    14.17    10:38:19.31 -02:32:33.7   9353 3796   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54699_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54699_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    14.35    10:40:49.14 -06:25:27.3   8811 6130   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    14.36    10:40:49.16 -06:25:28.0   8816 6131   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54714_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54714_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    14.33    10:37:32.52 -05:36:49.8   9344 5674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    14.32    10:37:32.47 -05:36:47.7   9351 5674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54716_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54716_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    14.34    10:38:46.47 -03:21:39.4   9245 4288   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    14.20    10:38:46.37 -03:21:36.7   9251 4288   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54726_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54726_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    14.54    11:36:59.49 -02:37:19.8   0472 3292   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    14.62    11:36:59.37 -02:37:21.6   0478 3293   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54796_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 54796_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    14.58    10:41:00.93 +01:00:33.0   9079 1612   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    14.65    10:41:00.83 +01:00:29.8   9085 1613   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 28939_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 28939_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    10.74    10:57:44.94 -04:33:25.9   6325 4814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits **** FOUND 10:57:44.95 -04:33:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 50034_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 50034_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    13.75    10:41:57.46 -05:51:55.9   8658 5776   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 3   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    13.63    10:41:57.37 -05:51:56.5   8664 5777   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 02578_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 02578_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    13.28    10:39:25.45 +02:11:56.2   9379 0901   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits **** FOUND 10:39:25.49 +02:11:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22128_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 22128_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    13.69    10:39:59.28 -03:46:57.8   9042 4531   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    13.78    10:39:59.33 -03:46:57.5   9047 4532   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21662_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 21662_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    11.16    10:38:40.42 -05:54:23.1   9165 5840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits **** FOUND 10:38:40.41 -05:54:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23417_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 The candidate 23417_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 17.17346    2461177.67346    13.57    10:38:11.24 -03:09:40.1   9343 4173   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-09-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0094.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 17.17390    2461177.67390    13.70    10:38:11.26 -03:09:39.7   9349 4173   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_231159_TTUQ1b1x1_1505585_ID0RaZCc/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_23-10-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0095.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 11:39:22.57 +02:03:05.2 11:09:31.14 +01:26:53.0 10:42:34.51 +00:45:24.6 11:38:23.35 -05:04:17.8 ########### Completed Leo-08-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 11:39:22.57 +02:03:05.2 11:09:31.14 +01:26:53.0 10:42:34.51 +00:45:24.6 11:38:23.35 -05:04:17.8 ################################################################################### 11:39:22.57 +02:03:05.2 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 11:09:31.14 +01:26:53.0 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 10:42:34.51 +00:45:24.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 11:38:23.35 -05:04:17.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461177.67346487 -observatory V36 03:46:48.29 +20:31:31.9 Mercury (-2.1mag) 05:48:29.12 +24:56:45.6 Venus (-3.9mag) 01:46:16.57 +10:09:25.0 Mars (1.2mag) 07:31:15.57 +22:11:09.5 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:42:05.23 +02:07:16.0 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:54:52.62 +20:09:46.5 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:14:25.78 +00:06:48.5 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:34:10.01 -22:57:28.5 Pluto (14.5mag) 03:47:14.04 +24:26:06.4 Moon (99.9mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 May 16 23:14 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461177.67346487: 07:31:13.54 +22:11:12.7 Io (5.9mag) 07:31:05.66 +22:11:36.1 Europa (6.1mag) 07:31:00.62 +22:11:44.8 Ganymede (5.5mag) 07:31:34.84 +22:10:27.7 Callisto (6.7mag) 07:32:53.80 +21:48:37.3 Himalia (15.5mag) 07:31:14.10 +22:11:12.7 Thebe (16.4mag) 07:33:19.94 +22:13:33.0 Elara (17.4mag) 07:32:11.06 +22:34:44.6 Pasiphae (17.6mag) 07:38:42.37 +22:11:26.3 Carme (18.7mag) 00:42:09.57 +02:07:40.7 Titan (8.7mag) 00:42:01.41 +02:07:24.5 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:42:07.41 +02:05:53.2 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:41:59.79 +02:07:02.0 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:43:12.85 +02:12:16.4 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 16 23:14 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461177.67346487: 17:07:46.51 -31:05:25.6 JWST 19:12:13.34 +15:21:13.5 Chandra 18:08:11.23 -35:05:57.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 16 23:14 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461177.67346487 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] 13:29:42.73 -27:57:20.3 14.6mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard) 06:21:55.25 +30:51:55.8 15.8mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks) 15:34:35.65 +00:51:28.6 14.7mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift) 05:13:45.46 +24:17:10.7 17.1mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr) 08:25:36.17 +22:04:38.3 17.7mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina) 18:54:18.32 -30:56:52.0 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:32:29.44 -68:29:01.5 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:41:15.30 +31:42:31.6 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:23:08.38 +13:49:38.4 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:14:49.44 +30:37:56.3 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:06:52.94 +26:43:48.6 16.3mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:15:39.40 +31:43:16.7 16.5mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:40:04.46 +02:37:04.8 17.5mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:41:27.06 +20:46:10.3 17.7mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:28:16.52 -11:06:26.8 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 08:59:49.97 -07:37:23.6 17.9mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 22:14:41.20 +65:01:00.2 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 18:35:50.87 -04:53:56.1 13.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 14:37:50.26 +87:26:35.9 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:43:01.09 +63:43:58.4 17.5mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:11:59.13 +25:17:04.8 12.7mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:55:26.24 +11:06:08.1 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:22:26.46 +24:23:47.9 14.2mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:56:01.11 -18:11:50.7 16.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:45:07.59 +38:30:42.8 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:59:34.45 +53:23:56.0 16.6mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:01:29.64 -09:12:22.4 11.3mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:42:50.56 +04:25:43.2 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 01:17:29.99 +41:31:31.0 15.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:12:15.29 -13:26:36.1 16.1mag A/2026 E1 19:42:47.27 -08:14:05.7 10.0mag 10P/Tempel 14:24:08.64 -01:07:11.6 16.8mag 24P/Schaumasse 10:59:03.23 -00:53:21.7 15.9mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:45:53.84 -02:37:26.8 17.6mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 02:37:21.17 +22:30:27.6 17.5mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:13:11.38 +29:43:18.9 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:05:38.83 -08:06:26.4 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 05:33:25.51 +29:58:58.7 16.3mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:16:40.53 +13:57:17.3 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 00:29:08.27 -00:29:21.3 15.1mag 88P/Howell 03:44:07.55 +27:34:49.8 15.1mag 93P/Lovas 05:59:30.85 +33:19:16.6 15.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:13:08.31 +24:14:06.3 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos 03:22:51.83 +17:31:29.4 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 03:49:31.16 +17:40:55.0 17.7mag 131P/Mueller 04:13:28.58 +19:34:19.1 12.0mag 141P/Machholz 04:16:55.73 +14:43:31.7 11.9mag 141P-A/Machholz 02:58:27.74 +11:18:26.7 10.5mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:41:23.94 -28:10:33.7 17.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 02:32:16.87 +14:01:48.0 14.8mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:30:45.57 -03:43:09.9 18.0mag 169P/NEAT 17:08:49.52 -10:13:10.5 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR 06:44:24.56 +35:55:04.9 17.2mag 240P/NEAT 23:35:28.98 -11:09:36.9 17.0mag 260P/McNaught 03:07:37.29 +27:57:45.2 17.7mag 295P/LINEAR 15:26:44.86 +08:19:24.3 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 07:50:56.27 +21:11:18.2 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS 06:24:10.12 +43:10:06.0 17.7mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K May 16 23:14 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 2026-05-13.41 16.8 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 2026-05-13.41 16.8 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 16 23:14 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 16 23:14 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 11:05:13.920 -00:28:49.93 AT 2026mci 2026-05-03.59 21.84 10:43:17.140 +04:09:18.06 AT 2026mch 2026-05-03.59 21.97 13:59:38.170 +00:14:00.67 AT 2026mcg 2026-04-12.73 22.18 13:22:56.780 -01:33:23.87 AT 2026mcf 2026-04-12.71 22.19 14:27:03.250 -01:08:37.27 AT 2026mce 2026-03-18.85 22.34 13:00:36.733 +01:30:56.56 AT 2026mcd 2026-05-07.71 21.3 13:33:34.230 -20:38:04.35 AT 2026mcc 2026-05-10.28 16.89 12:30:05.331 -04:12:46.40 AT 2026mcb 2026-05-07.46 20.36 15:16:07.359 +03:48:05.28 AT 2026mca 2026-05-10.32 19.8154 10:14:10.957 +74:43:32.14 AT 2026mbz 2026-05-08.20 19.8513 14:32:22.297 +06:03:53.38 AT 2026mby 2026-05-07.25 20.4511 16:13:49.469 +47:54:54.22 AT 2026mbx 2026-05-10.34 19.5733 15:37:46.542 +37:59:22.34 AT 2026mbw 2026-05-09.37 19.7777 16:01:23.989 +62:24:50.37 AT 2026mbv 2026-05-07.32 20.0951 11:48:23.834 -40:55:34.22 AT 2026mbu 2026-05-11.39 19.96 12:10:44.247 +34:44:39.26 AT 2026mbt 2026-05-09.90 19.13 10:20:00.378 -03:51:57.56 AT 2026mbs 2026-05-11.05 19.493 10:48:39.561 -06:48:28.31 AT 2026mbr 2026-05-11.38 20.26 10:50:02.082 -38:17:48.70 AT 2026mbq 2026-04-21.46 20.67 15:00:09.974 -20:41:38.57 AT 2026mbp 2026-01-15.56 19.2499 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 16 23:14 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 101 C - WARNING