This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1368 2461177.6368 13.75 04:46:45.63 +70:24:07.0
140.30027 15.96580 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.1" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 04:46:45.63 +70:24:07.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:46:45.63 +70:24:07.0: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:46:45.63 +70:24:07.0: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461177.6368,13.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260517.1368 13.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1368 2461177.6368 10.87 03:49:42.60 +68:10:23.8
138.33614 10.81028 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" CG Cam
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.500 V 14.000 V 2451345.00000 258.500000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 03:49:42.60 +68:10:23.8: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 03:49:42.60 +68:10:23.8: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CG Cam,2461177.6368,10.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CG Cam 20260517.1368 10.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
First image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Last image: 2461177.63712891 17.05.2026 03:17:17.938 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14431
Objects passed selection criteria: 14408
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12617.2
Average stars matched: 12269.8 (97.2458 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 119156 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 22:30:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
First image: 2461082.77180627 11.02.2026 06:31:14.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Last image: 2461177.63712891 17.05.2026 03:17:17.938 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 89
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 99598
Objects passed selection criteria: 99353
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 80246
Average stars matched: 77207.2 (96.2132 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1931420 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 22:32:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461177.63654454
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Image size: 931.3'x615.5' 15.5(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.84"/pix along the X axis and 5.78"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.84"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.8" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:24.099 +70:00:29.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04
Second-epoch image center 04:48:24.099 +70:00:29.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0630 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:26.836 +69:59:57.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04
Second-epoch image center 04:48:26.836 +69:59:57.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0682 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:48:24.099 +70:00:29.57
Second-epoch second image center 04:48:26.836 +69:59:57.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00961 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Bx3dt6BcMt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l6snPNjvOf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6k4uMveCB9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits &> /tmp/tmp.D3EFZyhejM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.4976 to 99.7245 deg, Dec +63.0575 to +75.4625 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.4976 to 99.7245 deg, Dec 63.0575 to 75.4625 deg
Loaded 13922 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 27 out of 37 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 37 out of 14898 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.850900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.850900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.4976 to 99.7245 deg, Dec +63.0575 to +75.4625 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.4976 to 99.7245 deg, Dec 63.0575 to 75.4625 deg
Loaded 13922 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 27 out of 37 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 37 out of 14898 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 14971 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.8025 to 99.7224 deg, Dec +63.0579 to +75.4657 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.8025 to 99.7224 deg, Dec 63.0579 to 75.4657 deg
Loaded 13849 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 25 out of 34 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 34 out of 14971 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
2.1 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
3.1 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
3.2 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
15.2 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Bx3dt6BcMt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1217, passed=14898
Got 14898 stars (including 13659 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14898 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012935 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010348 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.1 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 287 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 232 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 225 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3429 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.14"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.1 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 344 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.08"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.22"
Excluding outliers - 312 stars left (next iteration limit 247)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=312 sigma_overall_arcsec=9.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=26.200 sigma_q2_arcsec=7.564 sigma_q3_arcsec=24.743 sigma_q4_arcsec=7.958 n_q1=18 n_q2=140 n_q3=16 n_q4=138 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.798
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.l6snPNjvOf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1204, passed=14971
Got 14971 stars (including 13753 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14971 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012933 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010347 (37.2 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.1 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 280 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 218 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 169 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 214 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.01"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.1 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 339 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 303 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.96"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 303 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4810 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.90"
Excluding outliers - 303 stars left (next iteration limit 235)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=303 sigma_overall_arcsec=8.580 sigma_q1_arcsec=25.777 sigma_q2_arcsec=6.945 sigma_q3_arcsec=22.183 sigma_q4_arcsec=8.516 n_q1=18 n_q2=137 n_q3=17 n_q4=131 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.004
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6k4uMveCB9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=405, passed=10383
Got 10383 stars (including 9968 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10383 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.491 n_q1=267 n_q2=230 n_q3=265 n_q4=202 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.D3EFZyhejM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=407, passed=10486
Got 10486 stars (including 10073 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10486 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.612 n_q1=266 n_q2=235 n_q3=257 n_q4=204 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits sigma_overall=9.364 worst_q_ratio=2.798
ref2=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits sigma_overall=8.580 worst_q_ratio=3.004
new1=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits sigma_overall=0.446 worst_q_ratio=1.100
new2=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits sigma_overall=0.480 worst_q_ratio=1.274
reference average sigma_overall=8.972 worst_q_ratio=2.901
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257_astrometric_residuals.png (312 matched stars from wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (303 matched stars from wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042_astrometric_residuals.png (964 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21042_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 21042_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:28.94 +67:25:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21062_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 21062_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:17.03 +66:08:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21082_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 21082_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:00.42 +71:13:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21212_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 21212_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:16.03 +66:57:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21235_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 21235_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:43.74 +64:14:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21245_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 21245_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:48.89 +69:31:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21273_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 21273_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:33.20 +67:32:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21299_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 21299_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:53.15 +72:49:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00325_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 00325_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:42.35 +75:06:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12630_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 12630_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:31.90 +65:31:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Image size: 931.3'x615.5' 15.5(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.84"/pix along the X axis and 5.78"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.84"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.8" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:24.099 +70:00:29.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04
Second-epoch image center 04:48:24.099 +70:00:29.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0630 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:48:26.836 +69:59:57.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:40.089 +70:00:51.04
Second-epoch image center 04:48:26.836 +69:59:57.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0682 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:48:24.099 +70:00:29.57
Second-epoch second image center 04:48:26.836 +69:59:57.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00961 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ic3Jwb0ggk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bPZhakBKF4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WQm9kDLO9T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iXb6iwPC8b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 107757 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.4945 to 99.7245 deg, Dec +63.0040 to +75.4780 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.4945 to 99.7245 deg, Dec 63.0040 to 75.4780 deg
Loaded 14035 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 37 out of 59 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 59 out of 107757 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.614600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.614600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 107757 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.4945 to 99.7245 deg, Dec +63.0040 to +75.4780 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.4945 to 99.7245 deg, Dec 63.0040 to 75.4780 deg
Loaded 14035 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 37 out of 59 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 59 out of 107757 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 108260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 44.4942 to 99.8836 deg, Dec +63.0104 to +75.4891 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 44.4942 to 99.8836 deg, Dec 63.0104 to 75.4891 deg
Loaded 14072 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 37 out of 57 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 57 out of 108260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 72 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
1.9 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
3.2 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
15.3 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Ic3Jwb0ggk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=48, blended=8978, passed=107709
Got 107709 stars (including 98551 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 107709 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012935 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010348 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.0 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 296 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 243 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.73"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 236 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21272 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.21"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 63.0 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 348 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 320 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.20"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 319 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32121 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.81"
Excluding outliers - 319 stars left (next iteration limit 259)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits N_match=319 sigma_overall_arcsec=8.666 sigma_q1_arcsec=19.275 sigma_q2_arcsec=6.823 sigma_q3_arcsec=23.141 sigma_q4_arcsec=7.694 n_q1=18 n_q2=142 n_q3=19 n_q4=140 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.670
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bPZhakBKF4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=8926, passed=108230
Got 108230 stars (including 99122 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 108230 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012933 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010347 (37.2 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.0 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 293 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 240 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.07"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 233 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.99"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 765 to 829 (Dec 63.0 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 350 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 317 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.96"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 317 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30524 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.71"
Excluding outliers - 317 stars left (next iteration limit 256)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=317 sigma_overall_arcsec=8.473 sigma_q1_arcsec=17.933 sigma_q2_arcsec=6.890 sigma_q3_arcsec=22.563 sigma_q4_arcsec=8.233 n_q1=17 n_q2=141 n_q3=18 n_q4=141 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.663
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WQm9kDLO9T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=2958, passed=54409
Got 54409 stars (including 51394 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 54409 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.530 n_q1=268 n_q2=229 n_q3=266 n_q4=202 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iXb6iwPC8b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=2780, passed=52764
Got 52764 stars (including 49927 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52764 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.558 n_q1=275 n_q2=225 n_q3=262 n_q4=202 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-16-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_222806_TTUQ1b1x1_856633_yAVfjENT/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 06:10:29.76 +69:34:46.1: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 04:46:45.63 +70:24:07.0: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 06:10:29.76 +69:34:46.1: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 04:46:45.63 +70:24:07.0: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 03:54:54.10 +70:13:00.4: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 03:45:35.95 +70:50:11.0: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 03:54:54.10 +70:13:00.4: 13.25 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:54.10 +70:13:00.4: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9162 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 03:45:35.95 +70:50:11.0: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:35.95 +70:50:11.0: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3260 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0257.fits at 03:49:42.60 +68:10:23.8: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-31-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 03:49:42.60 +68:10:23.8: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:49:42.60 +68:10:23.8: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=10.8632 delta=1.84 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out127553.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out127550.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74350.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127550_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
Preparing report for the candidate 127550_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127553_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 127553_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:29.76 +69:34:46.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.931 1107187357107516928 092.62474075806 +69.57946391908 13.9111 13.2798 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.931#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.8#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127556_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 127556_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:11.11 +65:17:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127567_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 127567_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:20.26 +64:57:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127641_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 127641_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:11.72 +64:49:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127661_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 127661_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:17.00 +66:08:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127682_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 127682_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:33:37.73 +64:50:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127823_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 127823_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:16.07 +66:57:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127896_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 127896_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:19.74 +66:10:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128020_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128020_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:33.65 +68:11:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128052_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128052_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:35.93 +65:02:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128063_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128063_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:32:28.29 +64:55:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128088_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128088_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:32:45.14 +64:53:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128133_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128133_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:07.98 +66:49:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128182_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128182_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:41.53 +66:36:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128226_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128226_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:45.53 +70:46:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128307_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128307_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:17.69 +64:45:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128316_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128316_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:40.81 +72:09:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128337_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128337_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:41.12 +74:39:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128347_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128347_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:54.09 +67:29:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128380_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128380_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:31.27 +69:21:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128407_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128407_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:47.02 +73:40:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128408_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128408_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:14.59 +69:04:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128425_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128425_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:58.25 +72:49:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128503_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128503_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:49.02 +64:54:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128559_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128559_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:38.01 +70:38:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128597_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128597_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:34.55 +66:16:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128635_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128635_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:08.89 +69:34:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128666_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128666_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:16.21 +74:37:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128688_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128688_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128729_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128729_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:54.09 +67:02:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128733_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128733_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:57.26 +69:25:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128749_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128749_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:59.06 +65:46:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128759_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128759_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:35.37 +67:04:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128770_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128770_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:45.28 +67:00:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128794_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128794_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:25.68 +69:50:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128882_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128882_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:36.05 +68:00:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128903_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128903_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:39.86 +68:29:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128995_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 128995_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129118_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 129118_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:06.70 +64:47:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129280_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 129280_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:43.23 +66:47:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129305_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 129305_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:30.81 +68:42:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129312_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 129312_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:51.38 +69:39:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129384_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 129384_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:01.83 +72:56:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129448_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 129448_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:19.50 +69:15:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99082_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 99082_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:39.30 +66:55:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42165_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 42165_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:00.34 +71:13:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89877_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 89877_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:36.62 +66:45:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55414_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 55414_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:33.22 +67:32:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61564_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 61564_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:26.37 +69:27:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78461_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 78461_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:43.43 +68:46:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12652_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 12652_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:39.79 +73:48:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27106_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 27106_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:08.69 +71:22:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74350_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
Preparing report for the candidate 74350_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50086_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 50086_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:20.24 +69:51:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05660_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 05660_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:56.19 +74:46:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75888_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 75888_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:28.94 +67:25:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98298_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 98298_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:40.74 +67:24:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71275_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 71275_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:43.72 +64:14:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84357_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 84357_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:09.17 +66:10:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01239_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 01239_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:42.27 +75:06:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78647_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 78647_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:09.55 +68:45:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75269_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 75269_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:32.29 +68:35:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59921_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 59921_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:48.92 +69:31:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88581_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 88581_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:02.93 +66:20:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75239_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 75239_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:03.45 +68:40:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44082_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 44082_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:14.30 +70:52:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30148_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 30148_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:19.98 +71:51:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38799_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 38799_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:22.27 +71:19:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85634_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 85634_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:01.38 +67:12:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66857_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 66857_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:40.28 +65:08:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70988_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043
The candidate 70988_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-17-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0043 did not pass the final checks