This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6295,6.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1295 6.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6295,7.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1295 7.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6295,7.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1295 7.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6295,7.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1295 7.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6295,7.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1295 7.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6295,7.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1295 7.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6295,7.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1295 7.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6295,7.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1295 7.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1295 2461177.6295 13.15 07:25:10.33 +22:09:24.0
196.29749 17.02920 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.17 Thetis 1 1 1 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:25:10.33 +22:09:24.0: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:25:10.33 +22:09:24.0: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6295,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1295 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461177.6295,13.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260517.1295 13.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1295 2461177.6295 13.68 07:44:58.29 +22:25:32.0
197.87293 21.36901 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.200 Dynamene 1 0 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:44:58.29 +22:25:32.0: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:44:58.29 +22:25:32.0: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6295,13.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1295 13.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1295 2461177.6295 13.69 07:41:12.33 +17:44:15.7
202.12314 18.75680 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.34 Circe -0 2 2 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:41:12.33 +17:44:15.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:12.33 +17:44:15.7: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6295,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1295 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1295 2461177.6295 14.08 07:41:13.21 +22:33:04.7
197.40460 20.61041 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.133 Cyrene -1 1 1 14.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:41:13.21 +22:33:04.7: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:13.21 +22:33:04.7: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6295,14.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1295 14.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1295 2461177.6295 14.16 07:47:33.64 +20:30:07.3
200.02958 21.21122 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.206 Hersilia 0 3 3 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:47:33.64 +20:30:07.3: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:47:33.64 +20:30:07.3: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6295,14.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1295 14.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1295 2461177.6295 14.26 07:11:41.09 +19:59:10.2
197.04744 13.27622 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.352 Gisela -3 2 3 15.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:11:41.09 +19:59:10.2: 15.45 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:41.09 +19:59:10.2: 15.38 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.13
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6295,14.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1295 14.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1295 2461177.6295 14.53 07:41:23.78 +21:48:52.4
198.15051 20.37321 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.9" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.382 Dodona -1 -1 1 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:41:23.78 +21:48:52.4: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:23.78 +21:48:52.4: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6295,14.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1295 14.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461177.62982703 17.05.2026 03:06:47.055 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 13
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 21666
Objects passed selection criteria: 21642
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 20388.5
Average stars matched: 19480.2 (95.5453 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 127584 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 22:10:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461177.62982703 17.05.2026 03:06:47.055 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 114
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 54 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 138256
Objects passed selection criteria: 137948
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 120004
Average stars matched: 115035 (95.8595 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2290980 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 22:13:50 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461177.62925468
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:59.908 +21:58:55.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:22:59.908 +21:58:55.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0222 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:02.940 +21:59:06.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:02.940 +21:59:06.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0316 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:22:59.908 +21:58:55.31
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:02.940 +21:59:06.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01211 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.emVNddcDw9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2flQoUHl5c
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RasJYBJ1oH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dAr0vakI3O
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.904800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.904800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec +16.4807 to +27.2946 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec 16.4807 to 27.2946 deg
Loaded 13969 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10670 out of 11761 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11761 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 12 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
3.4 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
3.4 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.emVNddcDw9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2218, passed=22550
Got 22550 stars (including 20300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=221 n_q2=247 n_q3=258 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.064
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2flQoUHl5c (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.362 n_q1=167 n_q2=275 n_q3=215 n_q4=293 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RasJYBJ1oH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=908, passed=17841
Got 17841 stars (including 16920 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17841 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17443 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.455 n_q1=195 n_q2=253 n_q3=237 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.240
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dAr0vakI3O (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=966, passed=18032
Got 18032 stars (including 17054 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18032 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.434 n_q1=192 n_q2=255 n_q3=239 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits sigma_overall=0.378 worst_q_ratio=1.064
ref2=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.413 worst_q_ratio=1.154
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits sigma_overall=0.450 worst_q_ratio=1.240
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits sigma_overall=0.459 worst_q_ratio=1.181
reference average sigma_overall=0.3955 worst_q_ratio=1.109
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (950 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028_astrometric_residuals.png (935 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029_astrometric_residuals.png (936 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:07:33.28 +21:20:39.9: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:40:03.61 +24:19:01.4: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:48:54.48 +20:44:59.9: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:15:50.54 +20:02:57.7: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:22:13.06 +26:19:51.5: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:03.61 +24:19:01.4: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:33.28 +21:20:39.9: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:48:54.48 +20:44:59.9: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:03.61 +24:19:01.4: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3461 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:33.28 +21:20:39.9: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2212 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:48:54.48 +20:44:59.9: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3224 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:50.54 +20:02:57.7: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:50.54 +20:02:57.7: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3200 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:22:13.06 +26:19:51.5: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:22:13.06 +26:19:51.5: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3827 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33131_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 33131_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33132_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 33132_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33133_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 33133_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33135_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 33135_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33392_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 33392_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:14.81 +18:30:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33506_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 33506_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:14.61 +21:59:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 33507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33517_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 33517_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33525_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 33525_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33527_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 33527_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33541_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 33541_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14622_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 14622_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.47 +23:26:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:59.908 +21:58:55.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:22:59.908 +21:58:55.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0222 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:02.940 +21:59:06.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:02.940 +21:59:06.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0316 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:22:59.908 +21:58:55.31
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:02.940 +21:59:06.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01211 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NVusJEyapQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Oq7xy22LkR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fZWxS0vXPM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8tH41POUOR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.769600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.769600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec +16.4751 to +27.2973 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec 16.4751 to 27.2973 deg
Loaded 14001 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8799 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 109 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
3.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
3.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.NVusJEyapQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=17863, passed=153629
Got 153629 stars (including 135492 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153629 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151026 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.272 n_q1=232 n_q2=238 n_q3=246 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Oq7xy22LkR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=46, blended=17705, passed=151450
Got 151450 stars (including 133487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148362 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=182 n_q2=266 n_q3=224 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.058
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fZWxS0vXPM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=6575, passed=88074
Got 88074 stars (including 81407 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88074 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86565 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86565 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.441 n_q1=198 n_q2=257 n_q3=247 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.253
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8tH41POUOR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=6599, passed=90174
Got 90174 stars (including 83473 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 90174 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88683 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88684 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88684 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.405 n_q1=196 n_q2=257 n_q3=249 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-57_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_220800_TTUQ1b1x1_289732_6D6K3AYk/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:40:42.19 +23:37:40.1: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:21:22.18 +19:43:07.5: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:24:26.28 +20:19:38.8: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:02:23.31 +19:57:21.2: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:05:01.30 +19:41:48.7: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:42.19 +23:37:40.1: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:42.19 +23:37:40.1: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1141 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:24:26.28 +20:19:38.8: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:22.18 +19:43:07.5: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:26.28 +20:19:38.8: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0437 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:02:23.31 +19:57:21.2: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:01.30 +19:41:48.7: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:22.18 +19:43:07.5: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5560 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:01.30 +19:41:48.7: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9272 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:23.31 +19:57:21.2: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9936 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:25:10.33 +22:09:24.0: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:25:10.33 +22:09:24.0: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:44:58.29 +22:25:32.0: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:44:58.29 +22:25:32.0: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:41:12.33 +17:44:15.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:12.33 +17:44:15.7: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:42:32.63 +17:07:59.2: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:42:32.63 +17:07:59.2: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:42:32.63 +17:07:59.2: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7755 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:32:27.65 +22:47:24.9: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:27.65 +22:47:24.9: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:32:27.65 +22:47:24.9: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7223 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:29:33.14 +20:12:13.6: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:15:38.30 +19:51:28.4: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:33.14 +20:12:13.6: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:33.14 +20:12:13.6: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8280 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:38.30 +19:51:28.4: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:38.30 +19:51:28.4: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8001 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:41:13.21 +22:33:04.7: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:50:23.33 +24:44:58.6: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:13.21 +22:33:04.7: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:50:23.33 +24:44:58.6: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:50:23.33 +24:44:58.6: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0374 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:47:33.64 +20:30:07.3: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:47:33.64 +20:30:07.3: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:11:41.09 +19:59:10.2: 15.45 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:43:54.99 +20:07:12.4: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:31:13.40 +21:02:58.0: 14.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:41.09 +19:59:10.2: 15.38 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:11:41.09 +19:59:10.2: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2330 delta=1.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:43:54.99 +20:07:12.4: 14.48 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:41:23.78 +21:48:52.4: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:43:54.99 +20:07:12.4: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3674 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:13.40 +21:02:58.0: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:13.40 +21:02:58.0: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3905 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:23.78 +21:48:52.4: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:33:45.86 +24:39:28.5: 15.08 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:33:45.86 +24:39:28.5: 15.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:45.86 +24:39:28.5: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6901 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:07:02.00 +19:48:09.9: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:02.00 +19:48:09.9: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:02.00 +19:48:09.9: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6614 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182029.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182406.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182444.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182732.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182875.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182982.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out183136.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 9s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181120_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181120_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181122_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181122_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:41.96 +23:03:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181129_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181129_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181130_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181130_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181134_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181134_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181144_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181144_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:25.84 +17:43:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181153_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181153_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:59.54 +25:31:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181154_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181154_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:12.03 +22:07:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181155_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181155_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:25.81 +22:06:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181156_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181156_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181157_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 181157_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181158_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 181158_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181159_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 181159_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181160_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 181160_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181480_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181480_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.67 +19:12:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181511_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181511_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.16 +22:38:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181566_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181566_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:14.49 +22:23:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181699_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181699_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.36 +25:56:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181769_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181769_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:27.44 +25:34:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181771_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181771_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.80 +23:56:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181807_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181807_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181819_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181819_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:53.90 +20:58:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181824_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181824_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.37 +26:03:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181864_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181864_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:55.67 +22:17:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181892_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181892_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.19 +24:32:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181894_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181894_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:49.62 +25:29:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181912_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181912_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.89 +18:51:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181922_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181922_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:02.36 +26:11:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181932_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181932_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:53.22 +24:07:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181938_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181938_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.37 +21:47:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181975_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 181975_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.36 +21:31:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182003_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182003_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:49.47 +24:54:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182005_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182005_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:49.17 +22:02:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182029_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 182029_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182074_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182074_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:12.92 +20:54:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182125_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182125_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:33.15 +18:14:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182140_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182140_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:22.31 +23:05:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182216_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182216_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:50.10 +17:03:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182218_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182218_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.47 +20:05:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182230_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182230_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.68 +26:19:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182265_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 182265_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182301_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182301_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.52 +20:31:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182306_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182306_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.07 +20:06:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182342_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182342_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:55.18 +24:28:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182350_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182350_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:55.52 +20:35:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182356_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182356_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:04.72 +18:53:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182363_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182363_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:39.84 +18:21:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182377_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182377_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:31.25 +19:14:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182378_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182378_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:02.33 +25:10:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182384_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182384_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.75 +19:56:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182396_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182396_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:28.62 +25:50:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182401_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182401_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:43.64 +26:07:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182402_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182402_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:13.59 +22:40:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182403_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182403_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:29.30 +18:53:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182406_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 182406_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182417_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182417_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:09.59 +19:03:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182425_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182425_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:54.80 +20:22:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182426_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182426_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:49.10 +25:18:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182433_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182433_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:22.54 +20:00:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182444_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 182444_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182455_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182455_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:24.60 +19:09:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182458_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182458_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.75 +21:27:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182467_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182467_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182471_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182471_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:25.21 +26:03:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182484_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182484_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:15.77 +25:49:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182485_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182485_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:54.00 +23:53:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182499_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182499_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.05 +21:35:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182500_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182500_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:53.86 +18:55:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182513_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182513_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:33.10 +19:14:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182542_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182542_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:27.95 +25:27:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182548_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182548_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:40.78 +21:21:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182553_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182553_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.81 +20:49:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182554_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182554_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182562_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182562_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:22.70 +24:42:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182601_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182601_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:39.65 +26:00:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182607_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182607_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:03.67 +20:16:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182616_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182616_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:26.09 +25:37:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182637_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182637_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182655_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182655_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:03.27 +27:09:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182665_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182665_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182669_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182669_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:49.61 +17:39:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182671_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182671_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:35.41 +22:37:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182684_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182684_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:41.68 +19:34:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182709_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182709_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:42.18 +18:24:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182721_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182721_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.43 +20:49:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182727_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182727_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:40.08 +20:41:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182732_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 182732_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182743_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182743_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:20.05 +18:22:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182761_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182761_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:01.55 +18:18:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182769_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182769_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:30.03 +22:53:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182790_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182790_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182793_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182793_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:22.28 +21:13:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182799_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182799_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:39.21 +25:35:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182802_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182802_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:33.85 +23:02:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182820_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182820_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:12.65 +17:29:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182875_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 182875_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182914_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182914_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:31.21 +19:26:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182929_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182929_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.08 +22:26:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182936_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182936_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:22.85 +17:52:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182962_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 182962_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:00.58 +25:44:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182982_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 182982_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183037_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 183037_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183110_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 183110_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183136_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 183136_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183172_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 183172_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102023_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 102023_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.47 +23:26:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168691_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 168691_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:57:29.36 +26:03:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119081_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 119081_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:12.46 +26:47:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49208_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 49208_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-06-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
