This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1285 2461177.6285 13.19 07:08:48.94 +26:47:51.4
190.33617 15.41175 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.42 Isis 2 1 2 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:08:48.94 +26:47:51.4: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:08:48.94 +26:47:51.4: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6285,13.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1285 13.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1285 2461177.6285 13.48 07:18:28.28 +31:33:41.1
186.52810 19.14201 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.9" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.98 Ianthe -1 -0 1 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:18:28.28 +31:33:41.1: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:18:28.28 +31:33:41.1: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6285,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1285 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1285 2461177.6285 13.52 06:42:22.72 +29:12:54.3
185.63240 11.06159 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.94 Aurora 3 -0 3 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:42:22.72 +29:12:54.3: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:42:22.72 +29:12:54.3: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6285,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1285 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1285 2461177.6285 13.85 07:31:39.45 +29:39:38.6
189.47662 21.14160 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.146 Lucina 2 -1 2 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:31:39.45 +29:39:38.6: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:31:39.45 +29:39:38.6: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6285,13.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1285 13.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1285 2461177.6285 13.39 06:36:35.70 +28:34:42.5
185.66557 9.64504 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.87 Sylvia 7 -1 7 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:36:35.70 +28:34:42.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:36:35.70 +28:34:42.5: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6285,13.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1285 13.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1285 2461177.6285 11.50 06:38:36.83 +32:44:37.3
182.02044 11.81596 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0638368+324439
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.596 R1 Y 0.495 R1 730.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:38:36.83 +32:44:37.3: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:38:36.83 +32:44:37.3: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0638368+324439,2461177.6285,11.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0638368+324439 20260517.1285 11.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1285 2461177.6285 12.72 06:42:01.62 +31:18:06.9
183.66769 11.86978 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" NSVS J0642013+311809
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.691 R1 Y 0.387 R1 95.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:42:01.62 +31:18:06.9: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:42:01.62 +31:18:06.9: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0642013+311809,2461177.6285,12.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0642013+311809 20260517.1285 12.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461177.62875853 17.05.2026 03:05:14.737 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 23433
Objects passed selection criteria: 23394
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 20706.2
Average stars matched: 20122.5 (97.1808 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 126700 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 22:08:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461177.62875853 17.05.2026 03:05:14.737 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 115
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 64 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 155463
Objects passed selection criteria: 155141
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 127246
Average stars matched: 122494 (96.2659 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1916456 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 22:12:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461177.62820041
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.181 +29:59:13.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:00.181 +29:59:13.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0085 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:57.607 +29:58:41.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 06:59:57.607 +29:58:41.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0200 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:00.181 +29:59:13.54
Second-epoch second image center 06:59:57.607 +29:58:41.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01285 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.68rZqMvi56
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.btJ1UQhwy9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RBt3YEOcc9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sP1YkZYYJc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10842 out of 11962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11962 out of 24243 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.910050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.910050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10842 out of 11962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11962 out of 24243 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2309 to 114.2881 deg, Dec +24.1931 to +35.3694 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2309 to 114.2881 deg, Dec 24.1931 to 35.3694 deg
Loaded 15192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10819 out of 11947 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11947 out of 24037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
3.4 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
3.4 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.68rZqMvi56 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2293, passed=24243
Got 24243 stars (including 21925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.349 n_q1=224 n_q2=254 n_q3=246 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.btJ1UQhwy9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2282, passed=24037
Got 24037 stars (including 21723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=224 n_q2=252 n_q3=245 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RBt3YEOcc9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=833, passed=17427
Got 17427 stars (including 16580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17427 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.433 n_q1=220 n_q2=255 n_q3=234 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sP1YkZYYJc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=863, passed=17645
Got 17645 stars (including 16766 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17645 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.441 n_q1=218 n_q2=255 n_q3=235 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.236
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits sigma_overall=0.401 worst_q_ratio=1.184
ref2=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.192
new1=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits sigma_overall=0.434 worst_q_ratio=1.245
new2=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits sigma_overall=0.431 worst_q_ratio=1.236
reference average sigma_overall=0.391 worst_q_ratio=1.188
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227_astrometric_residuals.png (942 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026_astrometric_residuals.png (936 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:01:59.24 +30:29:41.6: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:07:21.49 +26:10:30.4: 10.69 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:01:59.24 +30:29:41.6: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:07:21.49 +26:10:30.4: 10.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:59.24 +30:29:41.6: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1915 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.70 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:21.49 +26:10:30.4: ref_mag=10.70 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2617 delta=-0.57 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31382_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 31382_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:04.46 +26:29:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31383_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 31383_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31404_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 31404_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:36.97 +31:52:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31406_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 31406_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.44 +31:35:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31608_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 31608_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:40.91 +27:59:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31628_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 31628_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:42.69 +30:33:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31846_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 31846_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.60 +33:41:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31853_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 31853_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:42.60 +33:55:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32124_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 32124_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32231_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 32231_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:58.18 +26:55:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.24 +27:57:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15012_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 15012_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:09.26 +30:22:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 08118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:40.68 +27:36:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.26 +33:22:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.09 +30:16:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.181 +29:59:13.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:00.181 +29:59:13.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0085 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:59:57.607 +29:58:41.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 06:59:57.607 +29:58:41.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0200 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:00.181 +29:59:13.54
Second-epoch second image center 06:59:57.607 +29:58:41.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01285 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GZY8XtZoiN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ol2OQxRmdG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0gu7nJ3iv5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits &> /tmp/tmp.piLgIZbAc8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec +24.1448 to +35.3665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec 24.1448 to 35.3665 deg
Loaded 15341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8753 out of 12230 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12230 out of 167542 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.776200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.776200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec +24.1448 to +35.3665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec 24.1448 to 35.3665 deg
Loaded 15341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8753 out of 12230 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12230 out of 167542 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 166985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2108 to 114.3113 deg, Dec +24.1637 to +35.3763 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2108 to 114.3113 deg, Dec 24.1637 to 35.3763 deg
Loaded 15283 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8658 out of 12221 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12221 out of 166985 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 113 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
3.3 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
3.3 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.GZY8XtZoiN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=53, blended=20873, passed=167489
Got 167489 stars (including 146338 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167489 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=226 n_q2=249 n_q3=235 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ol2OQxRmdG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20907, passed=166934
Got 166934 stars (including 145740 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 166934 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=937 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=222 n_q2=245 n_q3=237 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.195
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0gu7nJ3iv5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=6489, passed=88351
Got 88351 stars (including 81751 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88351 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.428 n_q1=224 n_q2=256 n_q3=237 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.290
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.piLgIZbAc8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=6648, passed=89152
Got 89152 stars (including 82419 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 89152 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87671 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.485 n_q1=226 n_q2=253 n_q3=240 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.338
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-04-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0026.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_220604_TTUQ1b1x1_225043_MPhUH4YO/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:11:01.34 +34:49:58.4: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:24:52.88 +31:22:22.6: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:41:31.25 +27:54:14.9: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:41:31.25 +27:54:14.9: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:24:52.88 +31:22:22.6: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:31.25 +27:54:14.9: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7456 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:11:01.34 +34:49:58.4: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:52.88 +31:22:22.6: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4597 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:01.34 +34:49:58.4: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0156 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:08:48.94 +26:47:51.4: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:18:28.28 +31:33:41.1: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:08:48.94 +26:47:51.4: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:18:28.28 +31:33:41.1: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:42:22.72 +29:12:54.3: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:42:22.72 +29:12:54.3: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:31:39.45 +29:39:38.6: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:31:39.45 +29:39:38.6: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:57:53.13 +26:35:13.8: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:57:53.13 +26:35:13.8: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:53.13 +26:35:13.8: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8455 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:36:35.70 +28:34:42.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:36:35.70 +28:34:42.5: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:38:36.83 +32:44:37.3: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:38:36.83 +32:44:37.3: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:38:36.83 +32:44:37.3: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5004 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:25:16.04 +33:10:51.6: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:25:16.04 +33:10:51.6: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:16.04 +33:10:51.6: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5634 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:42:01.62 +31:18:06.9: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:42:01.62 +31:18:06.9: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:42:01.62 +31:18:06.9: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7170 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out114325.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130557.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193871.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out194085.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out194629.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out194955.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70991.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192078_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 192078_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192079_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 192079_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:29.77 +32:45:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192085_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 192085_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:59.91 +31:09:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192091_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 192091_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192095_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 192095_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:18.61 +29:11:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192097_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 192097_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192103_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 192103_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:23.47 +26:48:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192127_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 192127_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:36.95 +31:52:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192188_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 192188_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:20.57 +24:47:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192355_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 192355_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:42.16 +27:55:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192602_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 192602_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:54.57 +27:49:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193076_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 193076_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:28.05 +31:40:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193141_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 193141_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:00.56 +29:47:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193174_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 193174_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:05.50 +28:00:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193343_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 193343_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:51.10 +32:48:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193380_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 193380_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:52.03 +29:43:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193404_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 193404_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:15.57 +27:12:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193531_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 193531_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:27.39 +25:34:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193553_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 193553_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:05.06 +34:09:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193602_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 193602_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:47.89 +25:27:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193630_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 193630_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:23.54 +26:08:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193649_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 193649_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:49.31 +32:38:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193711_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 193711_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.12 +32:21:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193755_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 193755_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:47.05 +34:14:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193766_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 193766_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:39.41 +26:48:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193806_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 193806_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:12.65 +30:33:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193838_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 193838_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:47.18 +27:58:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193871_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 193871_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193891_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 193891_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:08.97 +34:08:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193975_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 193975_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:31.39 +30:38:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193997_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 193997_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:30.77 +32:10:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194008_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194008_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:20.75 +27:15:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194060_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194060_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:39.53 +28:12:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:59.30 +33:13:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194076_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194076_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:31.44 +29:02:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194085_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 194085_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194094_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194094_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:03.20 +27:02:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194185_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194185_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:49.06 +25:18:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194197_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194197_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.58 +26:19:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194218_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194218_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:35.28 +31:07:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194245_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194245_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:13.83 +28:32:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194247_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194247_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:57.18 +30:18:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194260_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194260_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:02.83 +25:10:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194339_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194339_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.45 +26:04:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194348_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194348_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:32.23 +34:46:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194374_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194374_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:20.89 +30:56:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194408_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194408_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:44.11 +25:53:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194416_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194416_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:25.67 +24:59:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194444_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194444_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:47.13 +34:48:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194466_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194466_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:26.92 +33:15:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194469_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194469_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:55.93 +27:08:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194478_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194478_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:46.50 +26:19:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194536_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194536_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:28.64 +25:50:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194567_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194567_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:31.32 +27:14:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194573_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194573_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:29.68 +29:19:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194603_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194603_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:15.71 +25:49:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194616_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194616_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:11.74 +26:58:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194629_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 194629_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194673_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194673_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:53.26 +26:47:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194679_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194679_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:52.10 +27:10:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194693_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194693_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:02.21 +31:46:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194709_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194709_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:12.97 +30:35:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194752_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194752_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:40.99 +32:38:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194788_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194788_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:39.33 +25:35:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:58.76 +27:40:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194862_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194862_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:53.39 +28:54:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194865_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194865_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:09.16 +27:46:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194875_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194875_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:14.87 +31:35:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194877_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194877_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:23.20 +31:15:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194878_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194878_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:20.72 +29:56:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194913_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194913_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:53.72 +31:36:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194946_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194946_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:36.10 +32:49:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194955_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 194955_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194970_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 194970_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:31.78 +30:51:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195016_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 195016_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:56.26 +26:45:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195079_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 195079_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:15.34 +30:35:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195119_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 195119_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:08.41 +27:43:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195148_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 195148_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:50.14 +27:27:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195204_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 195204_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195246_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 195246_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:16.83 +26:52:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195309_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 195309_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:06.17 +33:41:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195341_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 195341_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:36.59 +29:17:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195399_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 195399_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:04.21 +28:04:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195406_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 195406_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:56.80 +27:37:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195407_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 195407_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:04.36 +28:25:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195417_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 195417_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:56.82 +27:21:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195423_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 195423_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:18.96 +29:12:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195485_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 195485_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:10.02 +28:24:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195486_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 195486_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:44.06 +31:28:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195682_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 195682_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:35.62 +28:46:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36451_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 36451_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:47.94 +26:59:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80592_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 80592_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:31.49 +29:28:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.24 +27:57:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80230_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 80230_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:14.24 +29:06:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15305_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 15305_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:03.00 +25:19:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 108118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:42.69 +30:33:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70991_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 70991_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104221_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 104221_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:42.60 +30:34:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121816_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 121816_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:32.69 +33:21:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67957_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 67957_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:12.73 +28:30:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.09 +30:16:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25119_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 25119_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:48.69 +25:58:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130557_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 130557_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55671_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 55671_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:40.69 +27:36:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114070_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 114070_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:29.49 +31:24:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56485_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 56485_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.59 +27:29:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.44 +31:35:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119566_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 119566_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 32881_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:12.43 +26:47:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104378_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 104378_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:09.26 +30:22:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46991_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 46991_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:28.61 +27:25:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114325_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 114325_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027
The candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_22-05-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0027 did not pass the final checks
