This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1165 2461177.6165 13.17 06:52:07.64 +15:48:21.4
198.86492 7.28338 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.107 Camilla 3 6 6 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:52:07.64 +15:48:21.4: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:52:07.64 +15:48:21.4: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6165,13.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1165 13.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1165 2461177.6165 13.61 07:32:11.51 +13:02:57.6
205.65845 14.85171 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.194 Prokne 0 4 4 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:32:11.51 +13:02:57.6: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:32:11.51 +13:02:57.6: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6165,13.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1165 13.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 17.1165 2461177.6165 13.53 07:10:20.38 +15:11:11.4
201.36270 10.96492 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.80 Sappho 1 3 3 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:10:20.38 +15:11:11.4: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:10:20.38 +15:11:11.4: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461177.6165,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260517.1165 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461177.61676074 17.05.2026 02:47:58.128 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24941
Objects passed selection criteria: 24893
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 20188.2
Average stars matched: 19804.5 (98.0991 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 129400 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 21:50:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461177.61676074 17.05.2026 02:47:58.128 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 111
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 46 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 167233
Objects passed selection criteria: 166821
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 134495
Average stars matched: 131436 (97.7259 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1935284 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 21:54:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461177.61622970
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:37.408 +13:59:26.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:37.408 +13:59:26.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0243 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:40.371 +13:59:27.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:40.371 +13:59:27.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0170 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:37.408 +13:59:26.64
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:40.371 +13:59:27.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01198 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KhqKFnIAH2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fjiyS0ZSvu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZRfRzLreYS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UwQO3TpCe0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec +8.4660 to +19.3435 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec 8.4660 to 19.3435 deg
Loaded 18981 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13233 out of 14919 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14919 out of 28861 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.907000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.907000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec +8.4660 to +19.3435 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec 8.4660 to 19.3435 deg
Loaded 18981 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13233 out of 14919 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14919 out of 28861 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 25465 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3423 to 114.8448 deg, Dec +8.5622 to +19.2817 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3423 to 114.8448 deg, Dec 8.5622 to 19.2817 deg
Loaded 18666 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13861 out of 14947 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14947 out of 25465 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
3.4 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
3.4 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
14.9 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KhqKFnIAH2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3379, passed=28861
Got 28861 stars (including 25451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28178 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.452 n_q1=224 n_q2=241 n_q3=224 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.182
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fjiyS0ZSvu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2216, passed=25458
Got 25458 stars (including 23222 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.699 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.862 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.782 n_q1=188 n_q2=287 n_q3=176 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZRfRzLreYS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=711, passed=13236
Got 13236 stars (including 12519 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13236 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13009 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 909 stars left (next iteration limit 1001)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits N_match=909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.672 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.567 n_q1=213 n_q2=243 n_q3=219 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UwQO3TpCe0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=738, passed=13715
Got 13715 stars (including 12965 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13715 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13478 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 910 stars left (next iteration limit 1001)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits N_match=910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.752 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.565 n_q1=216 n_q2=240 n_q3=221 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.401
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits sigma_overall=0.495 worst_q_ratio=1.182
ref2=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits sigma_overall=0.699 worst_q_ratio=1.234
new1=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits sigma_overall=0.534 worst_q_ratio=1.258
new2=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits sigma_overall=0.537 worst_q_ratio=1.401
reference average sigma_overall=0.597 worst_q_ratio=1.208
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034_astrometric_residuals.png (924 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004_astrometric_residuals.png (909 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005_astrometric_residuals.png (910 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30938_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 30938_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:04.42 +18:15:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31084_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 31084_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:39.25 +10:34:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31151_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 31151_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:50.34 +17:58:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31376_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 31376_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:35.19 +15:01:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18995_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 18995_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:36.07 +15:35:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24160_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 24160_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:40.86 +17:29:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:37.408 +13:59:26.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:37.408 +13:59:26.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0243 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:40.371 +13:59:27.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:40.371 +13:59:27.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0170 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:37.408 +13:59:26.64
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:40.371 +13:59:27.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01198 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FuRvcWauJE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YpDrCPlQwt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WseQdlbDhs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits &> /tmp/tmp.souyRMvYms
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec +8.4571 to +19.3472 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec 8.4571 to 19.3472 deg
Loaded 19031 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10041 out of 15738 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15738 out of 208537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.747700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.747700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec +8.4571 to +19.3472 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec 8.4571 to 19.3472 deg
Loaded 19031 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10041 out of 15738 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15738 out of 208537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 174030 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3423 to 114.8515 deg, Dec +8.5562 to +19.2862 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3423 to 114.8515 deg, Dec 8.5562 to 19.2862 deg
Loaded 18685 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11872 out of 16121 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16121 out of 174030 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 101 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
3.2 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
3.2 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FuRvcWauJE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=64, blended=33805, passed=208473
Got 208473 stars (including 174370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 208473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204246 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204244 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.628 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.557 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.461 n_q1=232 n_q2=237 n_q3=201 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YpDrCPlQwt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=102, blended=23358, passed=173928
Got 173928 stars (including 150413 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173928 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171540 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171536 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.649 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.865 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.540 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.794 n_q1=200 n_q2=269 n_q3=177 n_q4=281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.332
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WseQdlbDhs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=5044, passed=77915
Got 77915 stars (including 72800 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77915 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 906 stars left (next iteration limit 996)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits N_match=906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.658 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.491 n_q1=219 n_q2=229 n_q3=223 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.350
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.souyRMvYms (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=5392, passed=80449
Got 80449 stars (including 74971 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80449 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79402 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 906 stars left (next iteration limit 996)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits N_match=906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.716 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.492 n_q1=218 n_q2=234 n_q3=224 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.501
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_214841_TTUQ1b1x1_3797317_YW4DKfwM/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:19:45.67 +17:04:09.7: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:04:24.93 +12:19:43.9: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:01:07.59 +10:10:16.7: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:26:50.07 +14:40:15.6: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:34:28.26 +16:22:22.7: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:30:04.01 +15:49:52.8: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:34:28.26 +16:22:22.7: 12.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:28.26 +16:22:22.7: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8968 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:19:45.67 +17:04:09.7: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:04:24.93 +12:19:43.9: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:01:07.59 +10:10:16.7: 13.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:30:04.01 +15:49:52.8: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:24.93 +12:19:43.9: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2458 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:45.67 +17:04:09.7: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2596 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:07.59 +10:10:16.7: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2268 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:26:50.07 +14:40:15.6: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:04.01 +15:49:52.8: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2032 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:50.07 +14:40:15.6: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0885 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:16:40.79 +16:09:07.3: 11.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:16:40.79 +16:09:07.3: 11.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:40.79 +16:09:07.3: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2267 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:34:24.26 +13:14:22.9: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:51:13.61 +15:03:13.3: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:25:37.32 +13:03:27.0: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:33:43.98 +18:19:33.5: 13.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:25:29.03 +13:04:45.6: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:34:24.26 +13:14:22.9: 13.36 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:24.26 +13:14:22.9: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0650 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:19:01.77 +14:04:54.4: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:51:13.61 +15:03:13.3: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:13.61 +15:03:13.3: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8045 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:25:37.32 +13:03:27.0: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:37.32 +13:03:27.0: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9975 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:33:43.98 +18:19:33.5: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:43.98 +18:19:33.5: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1475 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:25:29.03 +13:04:45.6: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:29.03 +13:04:45.6: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1308 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:05:28.28 +10:32:59.3: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:19:01.77 +14:04:54.4: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:01.77 +14:04:54.4: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1058 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:05:28.28 +10:32:59.3: 13.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:28.28 +10:32:59.3: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1741 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:19:29.49 +15:03:54.5: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:52:07.64 +15:48:21.4: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:15:15.79 +15:08:41.4: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:05:05.33 +14:13:08.1: 13.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:19:29.49 +15:03:54.5: 13.37 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:52:07.64 +15:48:21.4: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:29.49 +15:03:54.5: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2557 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:17:16.25 +13:51:26.9: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:15:15.79 +15:08:41.4: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:15.79 +15:08:41.4: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2847 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:16:19.37 +09:39:39.6: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:05:05.33 +14:13:08.1: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:32:11.51 +13:02:57.6: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:05.33 +14:13:08.1: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3303 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:27:28.64 +12:56:36.6: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:17:16.25 +13:51:26.9: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:16.25 +13:51:26.9: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4343 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:10:20.38 +15:11:11.4: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:16:19.37 +09:39:39.6: 13.55 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:19.37 +09:39:39.6: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4588 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:32:11.51 +13:02:57.6: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:27:28.64 +12:56:36.6: 13.81 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:28.64 +12:56:36.6: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5823 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:10:20.38 +15:11:11.4: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:50:23.53 +13:32:19.8: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:50:23.53 +13:32:19.8: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:50:23.53 +13:32:19.8: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8327 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:35:12.13 +12:52:40.1: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:35:12.13 +12:52:40.1: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:35:12.13 +12:52:40.1: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0102 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229654.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out230066.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out230151.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227623_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 227623_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227624_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 227624_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227629_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 227629_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:49.26 +16:09:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227631_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 227631_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:24.77 +12:53:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227632_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 227632_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227633_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 227633_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227634_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 227634_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:32.17 +09:50:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227635_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 227635_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227638_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 227638_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227639_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 227639_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:50.55 +12:12:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227640_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 227640_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:50.89 +16:18:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227645_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 227645_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:11.00 +18:24:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227855_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 227855_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:50.39 +17:58:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227902_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 227902_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:09.93 +16:09:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227977_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 227977_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228122_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 228122_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:25.82 +16:11:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228165_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 228165_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:14.27 +13:51:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228171_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 228171_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:56.17 +13:15:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228247_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 228247_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:44.24 +16:43:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228399_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 228399_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.54 +19:12:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228461_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 228461_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:07.42 +12:46:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228523_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 228523_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:59.40 +09:55:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228529_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 228529_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:06.73 +12:33:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228555_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 228555_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:13.22 +15:07:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228643_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 228643_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:47.42 +10:59:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228696_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 228696_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:08.27 +16:04:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228708_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 228708_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:33.52 +12:07:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228738_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 228738_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:02.83 +09:18:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228771_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 228771_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:30.73 +16:25:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228772_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 228772_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:46.72 +17:48:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228787_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 228787_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:40.68 +16:56:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228808_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 228808_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:01.41 +14:10:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228817_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 228817_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:29.20 +12:08:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228820_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 228820_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:04.46 +09:51:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228886_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 228886_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:55.37 +17:12:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228955_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 228955_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:55.90 +16:27:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229033_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229033_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:50.10 +12:33:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229108_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229108_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:51.70 +09:15:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229116_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229116_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:17.23 +09:01:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229148_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229148_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:16.57 +15:18:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229151_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229151_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:27.57 +12:51:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229155_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229155_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229172_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229172_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:19.20 +13:20:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229182_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229182_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:26.30 +11:13:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229183_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229183_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:23.74 +10:37:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229228_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229228_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:37.61 +10:34:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229234_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229234_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229306_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229306_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229329_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229329_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:14.62 +10:36:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229350_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229350_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:08.10 +10:07:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229377_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229377_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:50.75 +16:55:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229387_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229387_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:45.67 +09:23:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229390_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229390_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229427_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229427_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:31.46 +10:56:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229430_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229430_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229461_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229461_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229464_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229464_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:13.46 +16:09:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229546_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229546_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:41.06 +15:51:60.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229584_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229584_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229596_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229596_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:52.22 +12:24:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229606_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229606_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:12.03 +10:11:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229610_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229610_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:11.09 +17:50:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229616_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229616_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:55.50 +13:57:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229617_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229617_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:25.07 +16:09:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229622_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229622_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:06.13 +11:00:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229624_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229624_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.20 +14:13:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229626_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229626_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:54.08 +12:25:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229648_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229648_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:11.83 +16:34:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229654_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 229654_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229695_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229695_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:33.33 +17:27:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229699_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229699_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229725_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229725_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:23.39 +18:07:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229788_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229788_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:19.51 +15:47:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229798_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229798_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229802_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229802_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:01.47 +13:45:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229838_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229838_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229899_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229899_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:59.64 +13:05:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229942_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229942_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:11.37 +16:01:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229950_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229950_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229973_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 229973_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:05.41 +12:20:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230049_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 230049_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:30.22 +10:54:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230062_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 230062_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230066_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 230066_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230106_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 230106_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230151_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 230151_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58482_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 58482_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:00.15 +11:44:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219639_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 219639_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:22.63 +09:24:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219954_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 219954_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:29.62 +13:18:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19340_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 19340_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:32.85 +09:25:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89197_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 89197_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:55.69 +12:58:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136204_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 136204_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:05.13 +15:06:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100402_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 100402_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72111_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 72111_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:50.70 +12:22:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180972_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 180972_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:40.88 +17:29:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14964_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 14964_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:09.55 +09:26:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.49 +13:56:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220513_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 220513_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:35.28 +15:01:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219819_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 219819_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:39.30 +10:34:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219681_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 219681_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:58.62 +09:25:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219452_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 219452_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140414_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 140414_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_21-47-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks