This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3446 2461176.8446 9.82 04:14:44.51 +74:52:02.0
135.15372 17.06218 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSV 1494
Type: SR:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.400 pg 13.000 pg 225.000000000000 M8III
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 04:14:44.51 +74:52:02.0: 10.75 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 04:14:44.51 +74:52:02.0: 10.76 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.75 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 1494,2461176.8446,9.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 1494 20260516.3446 9.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3446 2461176.8446 9.56 04:05:55.75 +74:46:52.3
134.79281 16.59245 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS 481593
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.500 R1 8.950 R1 M6/7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 04:05:55.75 +74:46:52.3: 10.47 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 04:05:55.75 +74:46:52.3: 10.49 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.48 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 481593,2461176.8446,9.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 481593 20260516.3446 9.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3446 2461176.8446 10.72 03:37:05.13 +73:50:19.6
133.90004 14.60659 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J033705.00+735019.2
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.680 V 12.140 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 03:37:05.13 +73:50:19.6: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 03:37:05.13 +73:50:19.6: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 16.3446* 03 37 05.13 +73 50 19.6 10.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J033705.00+735019.2,2461176.8446,10.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J033705.00+735019.2 20260516.3446 10.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3446 2461176.8446 12.94 04:22:00.19 +73:29:27.4
136.55598 16.48248 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0421565+732914
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.190 g Y 0.770 g 2459523.82600 115.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 04:22:00.19 +73:29:27.4: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 04:22:00.19 +73:29:27.4: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0421565+732914,2461176.8446,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0421565+732914 20260516.3446 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3446 2461176.8446 13.29 04:20:30.18 +76:56:12.3
133.81174 18.72791 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 7.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J042030.29+765612.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.120 g Y 0.790 g 2459413.09100 469.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 04:20:30.18 +76:56:12.3: 14.33 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 04:20:30.18 +76:56:12.3: 14.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J042030.29+765612.5,2461176.8446,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J042030.29+765612.5 20260516.3446 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3446 2461176.8446 13.12 02:56:05.66 +78:09:27.6
129.30301 16.85756 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J025605.61+780929.2
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.210 V 14.650 V 2457402.80000 53.130000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 02:56:05.66 +78:09:27.6: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 02:56:05.66 +78:09:27.6: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J025605.61+780929.2,2461176.8446,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J025605.61+780929.2 20260516.3446 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3446 2461176.8446 12.20 02:25:23.01 +78:33:25.5
127.66337 16.55775 galactic Cep Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0225225+783327
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.532 R1 Y 0.467 R1 157.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 02:25:23.01 +78:33:25.5: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 02:25:23.01 +78:33:25.5: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0225225+783327,2461176.8446,12.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0225225+783327 20260516.3446 12.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3446 2461176.8446 13.60 02:46:53.74 +75:45:41.6
129.97619 14.49360 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" NSVS J0246533+754544
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.857 r Y 0.494 r 2458369.19270 116.662371400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 02:46:53.74 +75:45:41.6: 14.60 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 02:46:53.74 +75:45:41.6: 14.68 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 16.3446* 02 46 53.74 +75 45 41.6 13.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0246533+754544,2461176.8446,13.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0246533+754544 20260516.3446 13.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.69447938 09.01.2026 04:39:53.018 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
First image: 2461049.69447938 09.01.2026 04:39:53.018 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Last image: 2461176.84483566 16.05.2026 08:16:23.801 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 14
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 16091
Objects passed selection criteria: 16061
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13273.2
Average stars matched: 12806.8 (96.4854 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 120324 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 03:47:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.69447938 09.01.2026 04:39:53.018 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
First image: 2461049.69447938 09.01.2026 04:39:53.018 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Last image: 2461176.84483566 16.05.2026 08:16:23.801 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 105
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 63 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 104789
Objects passed selection criteria: 104516
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 80347.5
Average stars matched: 76853.5 (95.6514 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1934224 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 03:52:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461176.84426571
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits'
wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:01.055 +77:29:57.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Image size: 940.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:29.807 +77:28:37.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:00:01.055 +77:29:57.29
Second-epoch image center 03:59:29.807 +77:28:37.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0359 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
Image size: 940.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:27.754 +77:27:54.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:00:01.055 +77:29:57.29
Second-epoch image center 03:59:27.754 +77:27:54.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0454 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:59:29.807 +77:28:37.20
Second-epoch second image center 03:59:27.754 +77:27:54.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01189 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nsFRpdP43r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits &> /tmp/tmp.px7xOoNzgY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LIve7ZVRRy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits &> /tmp/tmp.URmJkApSk5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits and wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits and wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits and wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16361 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 10.9999 to 103.4512 deg, Dec +69.5819 to +83.1399 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 10.9999 to 103.4512 deg, Dec 69.5819 to 83.1399 deg
Loaded 18140 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8370 out of 9000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9000 out of 16361 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.901900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.901900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16361 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 10.9999 to 103.4512 deg, Dec +69.5819 to +83.1399 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 10.9999 to 103.4512 deg, Dec 69.5819 to 83.1399 deg
Loaded 18140 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8370 out of 9000 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9000 out of 16361 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 16218 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 10.9568 to 103.5000 deg, Dec +69.5819 to +83.1564 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 10.9568 to 103.5000 deg, Dec 69.5819 to 83.1564 deg
Loaded 18163 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8337 out of 8977 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8977 out of 16218 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
2.0 pix Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
3.8 pix fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
3.8 pix fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nsFRpdP43r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1344, passed=16361
Got 16361 stars (including 14997 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16361 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=221 n_q2=262 n_q3=230 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits -region wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.px7xOoNzgY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1323, passed=16218
Got 16218 stars (including 14876 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16218 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15983 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=219 n_q2=268 n_q3=229 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.056
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits -region wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LIve7ZVRRy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=461, passed=10402
Got 10402 stars (including 9939 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10402 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10232 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=208 n_q2=220 n_q3=256 n_q4=282 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.196
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.URmJkApSk5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=449, passed=10394
Got 10394 stars (including 9940 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10394 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10235 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10234 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10234 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=209 n_q2=221 n_q3=256 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.298
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits sigma_overall=0.368 worst_q_ratio=1.148
ref2=Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.056
new1=fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits sigma_overall=0.431 worst_q_ratio=1.196
new2=fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits sigma_overall=0.416 worst_q_ratio=1.298
reference average sigma_overall=0.3755 worst_q_ratio=1.102
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 06:05:49.89 +75:44:42.3: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 06:05:49.89 +75:44:42.3: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:49.89 +75:44:42.3: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1173 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 04:14:44.51 +74:52:02.0: 10.75 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 04:14:44.51 +74:52:02.0: 10.76 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.75 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:14:44.51 +74:52:02.0: ref_mag=10.75 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8212 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11036.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20927_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 20927_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:41:57.08 +76:56:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20928_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 20928_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:28:03.15 +79:32:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21044_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 21044_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:20:15.32 +78:45:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21375_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 21375_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:28:19.62 +76:43:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21393_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 21393_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:07.71 +79:43:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21454_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 21454_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:04.56 +79:14:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21483_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 21483_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:16:52.66 +80:09:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21795_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 21795_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09204_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 09204_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:12:18.15 +76:51:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04865_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 04865_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:46.88 +77:31:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05365_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 05365_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:42.19 +79:06:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12895_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 12895_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:11:57.26 +74:23:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11036_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
Preparing report for the candidate 11036_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
04:14:44.51 +74:52:02.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:00:01.055 +77:29:57.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Image size: 940.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:29.807 +77:28:37.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:00:01.055 +77:29:57.29
Second-epoch image center 03:59:29.807 +77:28:37.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0359 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
Image size: 940.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:27.754 +77:27:54.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:00:01.055 +77:29:57.29
Second-epoch image center 03:59:27.754 +77:27:54.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0454 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:59:29.807 +77:28:37.20
Second-epoch second image center 03:59:27.754 +77:27:54.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01189 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gZLDNLRKlh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XJ4xSTC7VR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U2RezVpPFD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n8Bp46m9qH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits and wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits and wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits and wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 111259 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 10.9605 to 103.8707 deg, Dec +69.5589 to +83.1453 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 10.9605 to 103.8707 deg, Dec 69.5589 to 83.1453 deg
Loaded 18250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7278 out of 9109 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9109 out of 111259 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.773250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.773250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 111259 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 10.9605 to 103.8707 deg, Dec +69.5589 to +83.1453 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 10.9605 to 103.8707 deg, Dec 69.5589 to 83.1453 deg
Loaded 18250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7278 out of 9109 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9109 out of 111259 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 111565 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 10.9567 to 104.0455 deg, Dec +69.5819 to +83.1563 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 10.9567 to 104.0455 deg, Dec 69.5819 to 83.1563 deg
Loaded 18244 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7245 out of 9101 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9101 out of 111565 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 96 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
1.9 pix Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
15.5 mag. Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.gZLDNLRKlh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=9167, passed=111229
Got 111229 stars (including 101869 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 111229 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109982 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=226 n_q2=264 n_q3=236 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits -region wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XJ4xSTC7VR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=9221, passed=111540
Got 111540 stars (including 102140 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 111540 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 867 (Dec 69.6 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 110299 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=228 n_q2=271 n_q3=223 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.073
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits -region wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.U2RezVpPFD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=3092, passed=50449
Got 50449 stars (including 47308 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50449 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.376 n_q1=194 n_q2=219 n_q3=264 n_q4=288 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.305
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.n8Bp46m9qH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=3082, passed=50443
Got 50443 stars (including 47301 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50443 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49620 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49622 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.548 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=194 n_q2=219 n_q3=266 n_q4=287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.287
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-15-34_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0240.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_034149_TTUQ1b1x1_2356751_zAorYUzf/wcs_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 02:12:58.84 +72:27:35.7: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 03:23:35.59 +74:23:28.8: 13.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 03:07:43.10 +73:08:50.7: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 02:18:40.09 +72:58:20.8: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 04:33:52.96 +73:18:42.7: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 03:53:39.04 +73:17:38.2: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 04:45:27.78 +72:15:42.1: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 02:12:58.84 +72:27:35.7: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:12:58.84 +72:27:35.7: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9364 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 02:18:40.09 +72:58:20.8: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 03:07:43.10 +73:08:50.7: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 04:45:27.78 +72:15:42.1: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 03:23:35.59 +74:23:28.8: 13.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:18:40.09 +72:58:20.8: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3265 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 03:53:39.04 +73:17:38.2: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 04:33:52.96 +73:18:42.7: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:43.10 +73:08:50.7: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8718 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:27.78 +72:15:42.1: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9526 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:35.59 +74:23:28.8: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0602 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:39.04 +73:17:38.2: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9343 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:52.96 +73:18:42.7: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8837 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 02:26:59.28 +72:25:01.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 04:54:26.46 +79:05:43.8: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 02:26:59.28 +72:25:01.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:26:59.28 +72:25:01.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 04:54:26.46 +79:05:43.8: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:26.46 +79:05:43.8: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0115 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 05:44:33.20 +74:34:20.7: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 05:25:47.86 +78:25:41.8: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 04:04:04.49 +81:53:25.1: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 05:44:33.20 +74:34:20.7: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:44:33.20 +74:34:20.7: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9347 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 05:25:47.86 +78:25:41.8: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 04:04:04.49 +81:53:25.1: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:25:47.86 +78:25:41.8: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6024 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:04.49 +81:53:25.1: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8082 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 03:42:35.66 +77:39:17.2: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 04:05:55.75 +74:46:52.3: 10.47 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 03:42:35.66 +77:39:17.2: 13.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:35.66 +77:39:17.2: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6795 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 04:20:30.18 +76:56:12.3: 14.33 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 03:37:05.13 +73:50:19.6: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 04:22:00.19 +73:29:27.4: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 02:56:05.66 +78:09:27.6: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 04:05:55.75 +74:46:52.3: 10.49 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.48 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:05:55.75 +74:46:52.3: ref_mag=10.48 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.5588 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 02:25:23.01 +78:33:25.5: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 04:20:30.18 +76:56:12.3: 14.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 03:37:05.13 +73:50:19.6: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:20:30.18 +76:56:12.3: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2797 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:37:05.13 +73:50:19.6: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7218 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 04:22:00.19 +73:29:27.4: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 02:56:05.66 +78:09:27.6: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:22:00.19 +73:29:27.4: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9313 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:56:05.66 +78:09:27.6: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1238 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 02:25:23.01 +78:33:25.5: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:25:23.01 +78:33:25.5: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1934 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 02:14:32.38 +73:59:07.2: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 02:14:32.38 +73:59:07.2: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:14:32.38 +73:59:07.2: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8145 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-39-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0167.fits at 02:46:53.74 +75:45:41.6: 14.60 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-40-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits at 02:46:53.74 +75:45:41.6: 14.68 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 02:46:53.74 +75:45:41.6: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5804 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out132971.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101638.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out105555.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out43371.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out49474.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54889.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out89346.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out93419.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130968_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 130968_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130970_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 130970_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130971_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 130971_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130972_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 130972_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130973_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 130973_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130975_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 130975_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130977_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 130977_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130980_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 130980_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130983_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 130983_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:20.82 +72:25:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130984_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 130984_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130985_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 130985_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:28:03.18 +79:32:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131441_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 131441_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:07.75 +79:43:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131499_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 131499_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:36.36 +80:18:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131574_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 131574_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:16:52.70 +80:09:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132017_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 132017_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132360_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 132360_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:06:48.05 +79:26:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132426_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 132426_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:14.81 +76:27:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132593_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 132593_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132663_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 132663_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:18:03.19 +79:03:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132677_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 132677_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:23.59 +80:51:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132707_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 132707_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:36:37.90 +81:39:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132726_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 132726_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:29.77 +80:19:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132763_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 132763_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:36:46.73 +73:40:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132834_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 132834_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:15.73 +80:02:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132865_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 132865_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:09:10.92 +80:04:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132967_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 132967_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:09.79 +75:57:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132971_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 132971_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:33.20 +74:34:20.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.805 499848916680749568 086.13751136682 +74.57246348330 12.9436 11.6104 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.805#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133117_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 133117_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:36.02 +78:21:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133146_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 133146_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:26.05 +80:31:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133343_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 133343_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:55:07.96 +82:23:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133359_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 133359_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:58:31.23 +77:04:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133416_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 133416_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:01:21.08 +79:39:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133453_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 133453_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:13.82 +76:18:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133549_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 133549_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:32:34.43 +77:23:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133575_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 133575_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:50.02 +78:20:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133700_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 133700_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133740_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 133740_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:09.78 +75:18:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133796_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 133796_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:44:04.84 +81:02:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133921_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 133921_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:21.35 +79:18:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133928_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 133928_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:03.80 +80:00:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133951_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 133951_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133970_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 133970_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:00.09 +79:46:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133992_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 133992_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134357_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 134357_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:24:07.28 +75:35:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66745_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 66745_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:38:02.36 +72:49:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75652_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 75652_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:11:57.18 +74:23:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33067_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 33067_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:06:08.47 +79:25:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52461_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 52461_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:20:21.42 +77:44:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106008_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 106008_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:39:25.22 +75:44:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121484_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 121484_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101638_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
Preparing report for the candidate 101638_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89346_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
Preparing report for the candidate 89346_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103799_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 103799_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:44.56 +74:52:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93419_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
Preparing report for the candidate 93419_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54889_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
Preparing report for the candidate 54889_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49474_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
Preparing report for the candidate 49474_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62490_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 62490_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:12:18.22 +76:51:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43371_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
Preparing report for the candidate 43371_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88814_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 88814_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:12:48.88 +73:56:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33685_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 33685_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:42.22 +79:06:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53878_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 53878_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:41:50.23 +76:56:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30319_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 30319_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:46.90 +77:31:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92101_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 92101_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:13.72 +72:45:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53968_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 53968_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:41:57.58 +76:56:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08882_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 08882_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:55.39 +81:55:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108190_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 108190_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:19:23.79 +75:51:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11463_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 11463_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:26:18.26 +81:40:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92294_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 92294_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88158_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 88158_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:22:57.22 +73:40:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40462_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 40462_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:20:15.36 +78:45:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55347_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 55347_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:39:27.64 +77:26:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105555_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
Preparing report for the candidate 105555_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121549_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 121549_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:43.05 +75:00:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63198_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 63198_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:28:19.66 +76:43:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93033_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 93033_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:31.21 +72:48:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77157_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 77157_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:02:13.98 +74:52:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100292_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 100292_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:21.23 +74:12:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100624_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 100624_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:25.91 +74:38:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96724_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 96724_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:07.25 +74:32:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94129_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 94129_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:36.18 +74:04:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22365_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 22365_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:49:29.96 +80:19:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74060_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 74060_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:10.98 +73:59:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56655_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 56655_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:49.53 +75:56:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91574_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 91574_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:14:17.31 +74:14:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70099_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 70099_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:58:02.66 +72:43:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87770_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 87770_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:15:07.69 +73:52:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74265_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 74265_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:38.00 +71:42:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109752_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 109752_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:19.21 +74:16:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108748_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 108748_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:39.22 +74:04:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81244_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 81244_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:58.80 +73:42:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87310_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 87310_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:30.58 +72:31:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46205_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 46205_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:43.11 +75:02:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107282_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 107282_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:12.28 +73:45:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107283_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 107283_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:12.86 +73:16:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79985_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 79985_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:05:32.27 +76:06:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110372_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241
The candidate 110372_fd_Cam-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_03-16-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0241 did not pass the final checks
