This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3084 2461176.8084 10.50 16:42:46.53 -20:46:41.0
358.49431 16.33341 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.21 Lutetia 2 -1 2 10.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:42:46.53 -20:46:41.0: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:42:46.53 -20:46:41.0: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461176.8084,10.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260516.3084 10.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3084 2461176.8084 12.01 16:57:43.52 -14:12:04.3
6.23214 17.38982 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 1 -1 1 12.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:57:43.52 -14:12:04.3: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:57:43.52 -14:12:04.3: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461176.8084,12.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260516.3084 12.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3084 2461176.8084 14.13 16:42:31.66 -17:20:26.5
1.30054 18.48986 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.358 Apollonia 0 -1 1 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:42:31.66 -17:20:26.5: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:42:31.66 -17:20:26.5: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461176.8084,14.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260516.3084 14.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3084 2461176.8084 14.28 16:44:38.75 -14:34:12.0
3.96810 19.74838 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.741 Botolphia 1 -1 2 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:44:38.75 -14:34:12.0: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:44:38.75 -14:34:12.0: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461176.8084,14.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260516.3084 14.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3084 2461176.8084 13.44 16:40:59.75 -15:43:30.7
2.42465 19.76136 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.364 Isara 1 -2 2 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:40:59.75 -15:43:30.7: 15.30 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:40:59.75 -15:43:30.7: 15.45 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.24
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461176.8084,13.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260516.3084 13.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
First image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Last image: 2461176.80865683 16.05.2026 07:24:17.950 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4616
Objects passed selection criteria: 4616
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4523.75
Average stars matched: 4186.75 (92.5504 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111348 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 03:14:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
First image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Last image: 2461176.80865683 16.05.2026 07:24:17.950 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 120
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 83 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 56163
Objects passed selection criteria: 56073
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 53546
Average stars matched: 48637 (90.8322 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 160820 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 03:19:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461176.80815046
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:23.228 -17:59:26.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:23.228 -17:59:26.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0417 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:20.167 -17:59:07.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:20.167 -17:59:07.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0289 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:23.228 -17:59:26.49
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:20.167 -17:59:07.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01323 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4whBheVvAL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yQb8GiqlYD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mXtBynzpEH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5u7NA36HgK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 571 arcmin.
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
The reference image (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Loaded 6041 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4269 out of 4396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4396 out of 6602 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.624800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.624800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.49
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.49
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Loaded 6041 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4269 out of 4396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4396 out of 6602 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 7698 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.4593 to 261.6825 deg, Dec -23.5868 to -12.1003 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.4593 to 261.6825 deg, Dec -23.5868 to -12.1003 deg
Loaded 6563 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4621 out of 4787 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4787 out of 7698 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4whBheVvAL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, passed=6602
Got 6602 stars (including 6214 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.2 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.2 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.618 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.760 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.601 n_q1=163 n_q2=377 n_q3=156 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.229
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yQb8GiqlYD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=483, passed=7698
Got 7698 stars (including 7205 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7698 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=181 n_q2=332 n_q3=168 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.064
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mXtBynzpEH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=328, passed=6985
Got 6985 stars (including 6649 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6985 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.793 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.925 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.670 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.918 n_q1=156 n_q2=357 n_q3=147 n_q4=283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5u7NA36HgK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=329, passed=6835
Got 6835 stars (including 6498 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6835 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6601 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.735 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.962 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.573 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.884 n_q1=150 n_q2=356 n_q3=146 n_q4=287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.309
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits sigma_overall=0.618 worst_q_ratio=1.229
ref2=Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.064
new1=fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.793 worst_q_ratio=1.166
new2=fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits sigma_overall=0.735 worst_q_ratio=1.309
reference average sigma_overall=0.506 worst_q_ratio=1.1465
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162_astrometric_residuals.png (939 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:42:46.53 -20:46:41.0: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:42:46.53 -20:46:41.0: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:00:33.52 -14:35:08.7: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:00:33.52 -14:35:08.7: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:33.52 -14:35:08.7: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3170 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21115.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21115_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
Preparing report for the candidate 21115_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21118_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 21118_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:39.87 -19:08:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21124_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 21124_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21128_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 21128_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:14.71 -20:10:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21131_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 21131_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:18.96 -16:23:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21133_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 21133_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:51.63 -18:32:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21137_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 21137_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:34.64 -17:39:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20177_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 20177_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:15.29 -17:09:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03060_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 03060_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:56.49 -18:48:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20641_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 20641_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.02 -20:12:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:42:46.53 -20:46:41.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:23.228 -17:59:26.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:23.228 -17:59:26.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0417 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:20.167 -17:59:07.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:20.167 -17:59:07.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0289 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:23.228 -17:59:26.49
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:20.167 -17:59:07.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01323 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Nbj0ppNDay
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5uFVFUOy4M
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iFavQAAB8b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YswKFFuA2v
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 76360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Loaded 6087 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4580 out of 5201 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5201 out of 76360 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.389800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.389800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 76360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Loaded 6087 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4580 out of 5201 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5201 out of 76360 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 90958 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.4593 to 261.6928 deg, Dec -23.6085 to -12.1003 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.4593 to 261.6928 deg, Dec -23.6085 to -12.1003 deg
Loaded 6585 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4745 out of 5431 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5431 out of 90958 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (aperture=4.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 82 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.1 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
2.2 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Nbj0ppNDay (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=4634, passed=76351
Got 76351 stars (including 71611 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76351 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.673 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.782 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.638 n_q1=166 n_q2=382 n_q3=135 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5uFVFUOy4M (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=5325, passed=90948
Got 90948 stars (including 85458 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 90948 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.442 n_q1=182 n_q2=326 n_q3=175 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.065
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iFavQAAB8b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=4232, passed=70892
Got 70892 stars (including 66584 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70892 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69110 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.726 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.867 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.906 n_q1=163 n_q2=332 n_q3=159 n_q4=289 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.248
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YswKFFuA2v (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=4022, passed=68245
Got 68245 stars (including 64157 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68245 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.705 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.859 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.912 n_q1=154 n_q2=332 n_q3=156 n_q4=297 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.293
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-34_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_025922_TTUQ2b1x1_1973986_b9ZHljsA/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:55:53.17 -21:08:28.3: 13.32 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:57:43.52 -14:12:04.3: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:09:18.46 -21:40:59.5: 13.65 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:43:23.54 -17:39:21.4: 13.71 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:02:37.48 -21:36:29.0: 13.87 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:30:19.64 -15:38:18.4: 12.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:46:44.44 -15:57:00.6: 13.87 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:05:37.57 -20:34:48.1: 14.09 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:55:53.17 -21:08:28.3: 13.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:53.17 -21:08:28.3: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3720 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:57:43.52 -14:12:04.3: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:43:23.54 -17:39:21.4: 13.77 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:09:18.46 -21:40:59.5: 13.93 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:30:19.64 -15:38:18.4: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:23.54 -17:39:21.4: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0150 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:18.46 -21:40:59.5: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.5772 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:02:37.48 -21:36:29.0: 13.92 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:19.64 -15:38:18.4: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1426 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:37.48 -21:36:29.0: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9867 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:46:44.44 -15:57:00.6: 13.77 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:44.44 -15:57:00.6: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1179 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:05:37.57 -20:34:48.1: 14.39 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:05:37.57 -20:34:48.1: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2633 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:38:38.85 -18:50:43.8: 13.54 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:31:34.10 -17:42:51.2: 13.84 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:57:34.88 -16:16:32.7: 13.66 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:38:38.85 -18:50:43.8: 13.49 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:38.85 -18:50:43.8: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6883 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:31:34.10 -17:42:51.2: 13.70 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:34.10 -17:42:51.2: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.8019 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:26:08.28 -17:02:23.4: 14.14 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:57:34.88 -16:16:32.7: 13.98 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:34.88 -16:16:32.7: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9817 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:26:08.28 -17:02:23.4: 14.14 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:42:31.66 -17:20:26.5: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:08.28 -17:02:23.4: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1015 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:06:00.14 -21:54:00.4: 14.06 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:44:38.75 -14:34:12.0: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:42:31.66 -17:20:26.5: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:06:00.14 -21:54:00.4: 14.05 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:00.14 -21:54:00.4: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7842 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:44:38.75 -14:34:12.0: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:11:28.13 -21:28:53.5: 14.17 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:04:30.75 -15:48:37.1: 14.11 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:07:19.72 -21:42:27.4: 14.29 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:04:30.75 -15:48:37.1: 14.14 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:11:28.13 -21:28:53.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:04:30.75 -15:48:37.1: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1160 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:28.13 -21:28:53.5: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8694 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:06:57.92 -14:33:58.7: 14.07 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:37:32.72 -17:45:15.6: 14.01 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:07:19.72 -21:42:27.4: 14.34 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:19.72 -21:42:27.4: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.9379 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:00:09.01 -21:24:21.4: 14.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:52:05.82 -19:41:36.4: 14.45 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:06:57.92 -14:33:58.7: 14.31 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:57.92 -14:33:58.7: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1911 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:37:32.72 -17:45:15.6: 14.03 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:32.72 -17:45:15.6: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2425 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:00:09.01 -21:24:21.4: 14.28 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:52:05.82 -19:41:36.4: 14.42 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:09.01 -21:24:21.4: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0664 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:05.82 -19:41:36.4: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1780 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:33:57.56 -16:57:37.8: 13.98 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:00:53.88 -16:45:07.0: 14.29 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:33:57.56 -16:57:37.8: 14.32 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:57.56 -16:57:37.8: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3180 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:57:09.20 -21:22:54.1: 14.38 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:00:53.88 -16:45:07.0: 14.25 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:53.88 -16:45:07.0: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2731 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:10:26.76 -17:36:07.5: 14.19 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:57:09.20 -21:22:54.1: 14.31 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:09.20 -21:22:54.1: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1318 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:09:58.81 -16:51:52.3: 14.45 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:10:26.76 -17:36:07.5: 14.41 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:26.76 -17:36:07.5: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2168 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:06:30.18 -21:53:31.5: 13.99 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:09:58.81 -16:51:52.3: 15.28 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:58.81 -16:51:52.3: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3578 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:48:53.81 -21:52:51.6: 14.33 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:12:15.37 -21:55:00.3: 13.95 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:06:30.18 -21:53:31.5: 14.22 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:30.18 -21:53:31.5: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1260 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:48:09.76 -22:04:06.5: 14.43 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:48:53.81 -21:52:51.6: 14.26 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:53.81 -21:52:51.6: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1237 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:12:15.37 -21:55:00.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:50:22.02 -22:02:22.5: 14.43 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:15.37 -21:55:00.3: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.9307 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:48:09.76 -22:04:06.5: 14.26 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:09.76 -22:04:06.5: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1804 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:50:22.02 -22:02:22.5: 14.37 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:22.02 -22:02:22.5: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3081 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:40:59.75 -15:43:30.7: 15.30 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:40:59.75 -15:43:30.7: 15.45 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.24
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:40:59.75 -15:43:30.7: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.24 new_mean_mag=13.4278 delta=1.95 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101891.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103233.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103358.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103372.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103151_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103151_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103183_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103183_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103185_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103185_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103187_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103187_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:12.64 -20:10:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103193_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103193_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103201_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103201_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103208_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103208_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103214_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103214_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103216_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103216_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:46.53 -20:46:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103233_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
Preparing report for the candidate 103233_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103240_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103240_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:46.32 -18:20:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103247_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103247_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:56.32 -16:08:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103251_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103251_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:13.51 -20:44:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103269_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103269_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:27.43 -19:14:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103270_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103270_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:52.60 -21:44:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103278_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103278_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:08.87 -15:54:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103285_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103285_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:23.36 -20:33:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103286_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103286_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:52.15 -20:05:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103295_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103295_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:29.26 -18:07:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103302_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103302_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:43.76 -20:53:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103303_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103303_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:14.96 -19:06:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103307_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103307_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103310_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103310_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103312_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103312_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:02.23 -20:30:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103317_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103317_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:21.98 -20:46:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103319_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103319_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:14.75 -19:53:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103322_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103322_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103325_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103325_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:02.14 -16:11:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103327_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103327_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:47.23 -20:22:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103330_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103330_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:26.51 -21:21:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103343_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103343_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:31.53 -21:46:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103349_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103349_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103352_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103352_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:22.14 -21:35:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103356_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103356_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:15.47 -14:22:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103357_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103357_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103358_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
Preparing report for the candidate 103358_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103362_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103362_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:19.41 -15:23:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103372_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
Preparing report for the candidate 103372_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103373_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103373_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:46.34 -13:55:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103375_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103375_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:21.75 -16:18:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103376_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103376_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:57.67 -14:40:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103377_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103377_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103378_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103378_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103383_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103383_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:11.15 -16:35:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103387_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103387_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103396_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103396_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103403_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103403_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103404_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103404_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103405_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103405_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103410_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103410_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103416_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103416_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103417_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103417_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:55.28 -18:02:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103435_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103435_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103448_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103448_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:39.46 -17:30:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103487_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103487_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103493_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103493_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103500_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103500_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103527_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103527_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:18.79 -19:55:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103551_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103551_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103568_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103568_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:12.95 -19:41:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103592_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103592_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103599_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103599_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103613_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103613_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103633_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 103633_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33988_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 33988_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:16.00 -18:56:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70330_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 70330_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:07.29 -15:27:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11549_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 11549_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:59.04 -21:22:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42070_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 42070_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:37.60 -18:06:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13120_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 13120_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:29.86 -21:07:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31039_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 31039_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:39.83 -19:08:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101891_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
Preparing report for the candidate 101891_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22381_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 22381_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.02 -20:12:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49054_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 49054_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:21.93 -17:20:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50122_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 50122_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:15.30 -17:09:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89638_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 89638_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:51.61 -18:32:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41466_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 41466_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:31.55 -18:05:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94594_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 94594_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:25.28 -19:53:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34085_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 34085_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:56.49 -18:48:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89327_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 89327_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:20.04 -20:59:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88925_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 88925_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:08.14 -20:30:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10122_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 10122_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:09.31 -21:29:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27251_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162
The candidate 27251_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-24-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0162 did not pass the final checks