This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3076 2461176.8076 10.46 16:42:46.56 -20:46:41.1
358.49436 16.33330 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.21 Lutetia 2 -1 2 10.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:42:46.56 -20:46:41.1: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:42:46.56 -20:46:41.1: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461176.8076,10.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260516.3076 10.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3076 2461176.8076 11.98 16:57:43.56 -14:12:04.3
6.23224 17.38969 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 1 -1 1 12.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:57:43.56 -14:12:04.3: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:57:43.56 -14:12:04.3: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461176.8076,11.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260516.3076 11.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3076 2461176.8076 13.97 16:42:31.78 -17:20:26.1
1.30094 18.48955 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.358 Apollonia 1 -0 1 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:42:31.78 -17:20:26.1: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:42:31.78 -17:20:26.1: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461176.8076,13.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260516.3076 13.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3076 2461176.8076 14.09 16:44:38.81 -14:34:11.8
3.96830 19.74822 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.741 Botolphia 2 -1 2 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:44:38.81 -14:34:11.8: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:44:38.81 -14:34:11.8: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461176.8076,14.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260516.3076 14.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.3076 2461176.8076 13.39 16:40:59.80 -15:43:30.0
2.42495 19.76132 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.364 Isara 1 -1 2 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:40:59.80 -15:43:30.0: 15.33 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:40:59.80 -15:43:30.0: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.35
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461176.8076,13.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260516.3076 13.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
First image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Last image: 2461176.80786196 16.05.2026 07:23:09.273 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 12
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4775
Objects passed selection criteria: 4775
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4647
Average stars matched: 4290.25 (92.323 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111476 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 02:47:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
First image: 2461148.85630580 18.04.2026 08:32:54.821 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Last image: 2461176.80786196 16.05.2026 07:23:09.273 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 144
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 39 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 57284
Objects passed selection criteria: 57191
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 54558.8
Average stars matched: 49468.8 (90.6706 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 162364 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 02:50:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461176.80735656
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:20.952 -17:59:38.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:20.952 -17:59:38.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0374 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:23.509 -17:59:31.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:23.509 -17:59:31.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0434 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:20.952 -17:59:38.82
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:23.509 -17:59:31.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01034 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uWgxkzUEQF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zSIh9dy5Uh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LGQTKR0RVl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wngOqsLtZh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Loaded 6041 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4269 out of 4396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4396 out of 6602 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.624800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.624800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.49
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.49
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9581 to 261.8337 deg, Dec -23.2408 to -12.5108 deg
Loaded 6041 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4269 out of 4396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4396 out of 6602 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 7698 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.4593 to 261.6825 deg, Dec -23.5868 to -12.1003 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.4593 to 261.6825 deg, Dec -23.5868 to -12.1003 deg
Loaded 6563 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4621 out of 4787 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4787 out of 7698 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
2.5 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uWgxkzUEQF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, passed=6602
Got 6602 stars (including 6214 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.2 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.2 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.618 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.760 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.601 n_q1=163 n_q2=377 n_q3=156 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.229
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zSIh9dy5Uh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=483, passed=7698
Got 7698 stars (including 7205 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7698 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=181 n_q2=332 n_q3=168 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.064
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LGQTKR0RVl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=364, passed=7429
Got 7429 stars (including 7059 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7429 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.730 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.938 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.616 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.871 n_q1=157 n_q2=356 n_q3=148 n_q4=280 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wngOqsLtZh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=338, passed=7112
Got 7112 stars (including 6769 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7112 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.744 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.942 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.926 n_q1=154 n_q2=358 n_q3=148 n_q4=282 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.267
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits sigma_overall=0.618 worst_q_ratio=1.229
ref2=Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.064
new1=fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits sigma_overall=0.730 worst_q_ratio=1.284
new2=fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits sigma_overall=0.744 worst_q_ratio=1.267
reference average sigma_overall=0.506 worst_q_ratio=1.1465
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160_astrometric_residuals.png (942 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:00:33.53 -14:35:08.6: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:42:46.56 -20:46:41.1: 15.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:00:33.53 -14:35:08.6: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:33.53 -14:35:08.6: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3302 delta=0.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:42:46.56 -20:46:41.1: 15.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21115.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21115_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
Preparing report for the candidate 21115_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21118_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 21118_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:39.86 -19:08:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21120_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 21120_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21130_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 21130_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:51.64 -18:32:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21132_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 21132_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:37.60 -18:06:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21133_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 21133_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:18.98 -16:23:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21135_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 21135_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:22.63 -17:36:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21136_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 21136_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:21.94 -17:20:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03060_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 03060_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:56.50 -18:48:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20641_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 20641_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.03 -20:12:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20177_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 20177_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:15.29 -17:09:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:42:46.56 -20:46:41.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:20.952 -17:59:38.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:20.952 -17:59:38.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0374 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:23.509 -17:59:31.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:14.795 -17:57:56.98
Second-epoch image center 16:53:23.509 -17:59:31.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0434 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:20.952 -17:59:38.82
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:23.509 -17:59:31.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01034 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nloEjUDCYy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dwSExuGE5N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nCx2pSxAK4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits &> /tmp/tmp.udGiuvlHSW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 76360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Loaded 6087 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4580 out of 5201 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5201 out of 76360 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.389800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.389800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 76360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.9179 to 261.8708 deg, Dec -23.2533 to -12.4729 deg
Loaded 6087 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4580 out of 5201 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5201 out of 76360 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 90958 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.4593 to 261.6928 deg, Dec -23.6085 to -12.1003 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.4593 to 261.6928 deg, Dec -23.6085 to -12.1003 deg
Loaded 6585 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4745 out of 5431 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5431 out of 90958 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (aperture=4.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 108 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.1 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nloEjUDCYy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=4634, passed=76351
Got 76351 stars (including 71611 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76351 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.673 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.782 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.638 n_q1=166 n_q2=382 n_q3=135 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dwSExuGE5N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh: line 136: echo: write error: Broken pipe
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=5325, passed=90948
Got 90948 stars (including 85458 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 90948 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.442 n_q1=182 n_q2=326 n_q3=175 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.065
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nCx2pSxAK4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=4593, passed=73023
Got 73023 stars (including 68358 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73023 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71600 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71600 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.692 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.896 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.609 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.881 n_q1=171 n_q2=331 n_q3=167 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.296
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.udGiuvlHSW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=4243, passed=71412
Got 71412 stars (including 67099 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71412 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.719 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.899 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.593 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.895 n_q1=166 n_q2=329 n_q3=164 n_q4=285 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-22-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_023929_TTUQ2b1x1_379027_751WSmfa/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:46:49.51 -18:11:45.0: 14.34 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:52:49.21 -17:19:18.6: 14.00 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:11:59.32 -20:29:36.3: 14.30 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:11:03.76 -16:52:28.7: 13.68 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:48:40.89 -18:08:55.3: 14.03 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:47:22.19 -15:00:39.5: 14.19 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:04:30.85 -15:48:37.3: 14.06 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:52:49.21 -17:19:18.6: 14.14 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:46:49.51 -18:11:45.0: 14.43 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:53:31.02 -16:51:23.0: 14.12 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:52:49.21 -17:19:18.6: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1803 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:49.51 -18:11:45.0: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2806 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:11:59.32 -20:29:36.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:11:03.76 -16:52:28.7: 14.03 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:59.32 -20:29:36.3: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.0059 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:11:03.76 -16:52:28.7: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1111 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:48:40.89 -18:08:55.3: 14.07 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:40.89 -18:08:55.3: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2345 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:47:22.19 -15:00:39.5: 14.10 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:22.19 -15:00:39.5: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3259 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:04:30.85 -15:48:37.3: 14.10 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:04:30.85 -15:48:37.3: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0970 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:53:31.02 -16:51:23.0: 14.41 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:53:31.02 -16:51:23.0: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3497 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:00:52.57 -22:02:16.5: 13.51 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:12:05.03 -19:20:37.8: 13.60 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:30:19.59 -15:38:18.8: 12.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:57:43.56 -14:12:04.3: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:34:11.12 -17:05:33.5: 13.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:00:52.57 -22:02:16.5: 13.67 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:52.57 -22:02:16.5: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7716 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:12:05.03 -19:20:37.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:05.03 -19:20:37.8: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7943 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:34:11.12 -17:05:33.5: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:57:43.56 -14:12:04.3: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:30:19.59 -15:38:18.8: 12.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:19.59 -15:38:18.8: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0260 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:11.12 -17:05:33.5: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2001 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:31:34.01 -17:42:50.3: 13.86 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:44:38.81 -14:34:11.8: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:42:31.78 -17:20:26.1: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:31:34.01 -17:42:50.3: 13.72 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:34.01 -17:42:50.3: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.7370 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:44:38.81 -14:34:11.8: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:42:31.78 -17:20:26.1: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:58:04.76 -22:14:59.9: 14.05 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:40:19.15 -14:20:16.4: 14.56 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:12:15.47 -21:55:01.4: 13.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:58:04.76 -22:14:59.9: 14.13 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:04.76 -22:14:59.9: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9920 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:40:19.15 -14:20:16.4: 14.64 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:19.15 -14:20:16.4: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3271 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:12:15.47 -21:55:01.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:15.47 -21:55:01.4: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7782 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:01:34.40 -16:25:40.9: 14.62 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:31:24.03 -17:57:37.6: 14.12 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:01:34.40 -16:25:40.9: 14.40 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:34.40 -16:25:40.9: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1824 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:06:58.00 -14:33:57.4: 14.02 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:39:28.81 -15:23:47.5: 14.44 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:31:24.03 -17:57:37.6: 14.06 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:24.03 -17:57:37.6: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1955 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:10:17.97 -15:53:53.0: 14.51 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:10:06.83 -15:44:40.7: 14.41 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:58:01.96 -22:05:59.3: 14.23 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:06:58.00 -14:33:57.4: 14.31 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:39:28.81 -15:23:47.5: 14.18 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:06:58.00 -14:33:57.4: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9698 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:28.81 -15:23:47.5: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3557 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:10:17.97 -15:53:53.0: 15.03 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:17.97 -15:53:53.0: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2380 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:10:06.83 -15:44:40.7: 14.36 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:06.83 -15:44:40.7: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2190 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:58:01.96 -22:05:59.3: 14.53 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:01.96 -22:05:59.3: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1269 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:05:05.79 -14:41:10.3: 14.03 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:12:06.71 -20:49:00.1: 14.90 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:36:10.64 -17:33:49.0: 14.90 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:05:05.79 -14:41:10.3: 14.16 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:05:05.79 -14:41:10.3: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2027 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:12:06.71 -20:49:00.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.29
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:12:06.71 -20:49:00.1: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.29 new_mean_mag=13.9830 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:56:05.73 -16:50:38.6: 14.50 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:10:55.38 -15:18:37.4: 14.81 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:36:10.64 -17:33:49.0: 14.38 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:10.64 -17:33:49.0: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4188 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:58:22.10 -20:08:47.5: 14.31 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:56:05.73 -16:50:38.6: 14.62 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:56:05.73 -16:50:38.6: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3337 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:05:15.66 -16:30:21.9: 14.79 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:10:55.38 -15:18:37.4: 15.22 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:55.38 -15:18:37.4: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.3026 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:58:22.10 -20:08:47.5: 14.20 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:22.10 -20:08:47.5: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2102 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:05:15.66 -16:30:21.9: 14.62 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:05:15.66 -16:30:21.9: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2450 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:46:41.97 -21:48:49.6: 14.62 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:09:38.32 -18:01:44.6: 14.32 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:12:04.44 -19:52:47.3: 14.09 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:46:41.97 -21:48:49.6: 14.68 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:41.97 -21:48:49.6: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2627 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:53:37.95 -20:39:49.7: 14.59 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:12:04.44 -19:52:47.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:04.44 -19:52:47.3: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.1222 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:09:38.32 -18:01:44.6: 14.34 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:38.32 -18:01:44.6: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1688 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:12:04.81 -18:26:18.4: 14.17 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:53:37.95 -20:39:49.7: 14.71 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:53:37.95 -20:39:49.7: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2913 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:12:04.81 -18:26:18.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:04.81 -18:26:18.4: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2501 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:12:03.11 -19:14:29.9: 14.14 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:00:08.94 -21:24:22.2: 14.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:10:24.17 -18:54:54.1: 14.03 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:00:05.59 -21:23:36.9: 14.55 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 17:01:14.21 -22:02:36.6: 14.62 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:12:03.11 -19:14:29.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:00:08.94 -21:24:22.2: 14.29 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:03.11 -19:14:29.9: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.0782 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:08.94 -21:24:22.2: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1423 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:10:24.17 -18:54:54.1: 14.20 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:24.17 -18:54:54.1: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3331 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:00:05.59 -21:23:36.9: 14.68 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:00:05.59 -21:23:36.9: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2706 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 17:01:14.21 -22:02:36.6: 14.80 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:01:14.21 -22:02:36.6: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2161 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-32-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 16:40:59.80 -15:43:30.0: 15.33 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-42-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits at 16:40:59.80 -15:43:30.0: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.35
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:40:59.80 -15:43:30.0: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.35 new_mean_mag=13.3899 delta=1.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103419.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101891.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103243.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103316.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103321.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103164_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103164_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103171_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103171_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:08.74 -21:55:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103174_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103174_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103177_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103177_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103178_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103178_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103179_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103179_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103183_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103183_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103185_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103185_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103191_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103191_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:12.67 -20:10:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103192_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103192_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103198_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103198_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:49.53 -17:33:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103204_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103204_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:32.52 -16:02:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103206_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103206_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103208_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103208_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103221_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103221_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103223_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103223_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103227_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103227_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:46.58 -20:46:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103243_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
Preparing report for the candidate 103243_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103249_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103249_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:46.33 -18:20:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103252_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103252_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:47.17 -20:30:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103255_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103255_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:56.27 -16:08:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103256_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103256_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:13.43 -20:44:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103285_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103285_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:52.60 -21:44:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103292_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103292_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:23.49 -20:33:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103293_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103293_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:52.15 -20:05:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103294_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103294_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:08.97 -15:54:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103295_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103295_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:04.93 -16:39:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103300_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103300_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:34.31 -16:51:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103306_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103306_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:02.34 -20:30:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103307_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103307_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103313_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103313_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:15.03 -19:06:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103316_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
Preparing report for the candidate 103316_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103317_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103317_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:43.77 -20:53:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103321_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
Preparing report for the candidate 103321_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103323_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103323_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:47.15 -20:22:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103324_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103324_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:46.33 -13:55:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103326_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103326_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:19.47 -15:23:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103331_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103331_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:21.91 -20:46:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103336_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103336_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:22.13 -21:35:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103341_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103341_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:57.65 -14:40:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103345_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103345_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:53.56 -15:19:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103346_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103346_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:14.82 -19:53:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103348_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103348_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:12.88 -19:41:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103353_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103353_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:06.88 -20:33:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103355_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103355_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103356_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103356_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:21.77 -16:18:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103358_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103358_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103359_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103359_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103360_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103360_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:21.90 -14:10:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103365_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103365_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:15.56 -14:22:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103366_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103366_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:11.27 -16:35:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103369_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103369_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:10.00 -19:43:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103377_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103377_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103382_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103382_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103384_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103384_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:17.79 -21:45:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103385_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103385_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103387_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103387_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103394_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103394_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103400_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103400_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103401_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103401_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103411_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103411_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103413_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103413_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:36.82 -22:05:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103415_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103415_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:06.65 -19:18:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103418_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103418_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:23.19 -20:27:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103419_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103419_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:06.71 -20:49:00.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.009 4116042914151110784 258.02899671790 -20.81769140270 13.3566 11.8794 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.009#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103422_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103422_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:31.50 -21:46:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103425_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103425_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103426_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103426_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:08.53 -19:43:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103431_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103431_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:07.70 -15:21:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103434_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103434_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103452_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103452_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103461_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103461_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103479_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103479_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103480_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103480_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103483_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103483_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:29.65 -18:06:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103484_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103484_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103486_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103486_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103520_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103520_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103521_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103521_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:01.99 -21:02:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103526_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103526_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103532_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103532_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:25.02 -18:29:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103550_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103550_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103556_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103556_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:29.09 -19:33:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103565_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103565_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:39.55 -17:30:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103570_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103570_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103580_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103580_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103618_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103618_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103633_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103633_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103664_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103664_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103751_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 103751_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:44.16 -20:51:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33988_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 33988_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:16.02 -18:56:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70330_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 70330_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:07.29 -15:27:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42070_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 42070_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:37.61 -18:06:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31039_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 31039_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:39.83 -19:08:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94594_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 94594_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:25.19 -19:53:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11549_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 11549_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:59.03 -21:22:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49054_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 49054_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:21.94 -17:20:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13120_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 13120_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:29.89 -21:07:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22381_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 22381_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.04 -20:12:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50122_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 50122_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:15.29 -17:09:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101891_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
Preparing report for the candidate 101891_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89638_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 89638_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:51.62 -18:32:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34085_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 34085_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:56.46 -18:48:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89327_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 89327_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:20.08 -20:59:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41466_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 41466_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:31.56 -18:05:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10122_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 10122_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:09.29 -21:29:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27251_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 27251_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:05.62 -19:40:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88925_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160
The candidate 88925_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-16_02-23-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0160 did not pass the final checks