This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.2447 2461176.7447 12.54 15:02:04.91 -05:27:31.9
351.94349 44.62676 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.498 Tokio 2 -1 3 12.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:02:04.91 -05:27:31.9: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:02:04.91 -05:27:31.9: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461176.7447,12.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260516.2447 12.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.2447 2461176.7447 14.40 14:51:00.07 +01:23:18.2
356.06236 51.48275 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1926 Demiddelaer 2 -0 2 14.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:51:00.07 +01:23:18.2: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:51:00.07 +01:23:18.2: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 16.2447* 14 51 00.07 +01 23 18.2 14.4 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461176.7447,14.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260516.2447 14.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.2447 2461176.7447 14.50 14:45:32.70 -02:40:20.7
350.13631 49.44898 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.598 Octavia 2 -1 3 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:45:32.70 -02:40:20.7: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:45:32.70 -02:40:20.7: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 16.2447* 14 45 32.70 -02 40 20.7 14.5 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461176.7447,14.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260516.2447 14.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.2447 2461176.7447 14.48 14:39:43.70 -01:48:09.4
349.29053 51.05383 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1278 Kenya 1 -0 1 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:39:43.70 -01:48:09.4: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:39:43.70 -01:48:09.4: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 16.2447* 14 39 43.70 -01 48 09.4 14.5 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461176.7447,14.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260516.2447 14.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.2447 2461176.7447 14.52 14:31:15.36 -05:08:29.7
343.45971 49.71084 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1107 Lictoria 0 -1 1 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:31:15.36 -05:08:29.7: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:31:15.36 -05:08:29.7: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 16.2447* 14 31 15.36 -05 08 29.7 14.5 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461176.7447,14.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260516.2447 14.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.2447 2461176.7447 14.76 14:27:41.19 -02:28:42.8
344.80279 52.38895 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3002 Delasalle 1 0 1 14.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:27:41.19 -02:28:42.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:27:41.19 -02:28:42.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 16.2447* 14 27 41.19 -02 28 42.8 14.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461176.7447,14.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260516.2447 14.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
First image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Last image: 2461176.74493027 16.05.2026 05:52:31.975 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6207
Objects passed selection criteria: 6206
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6015.5
Average stars matched: 5900 (98.08 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112260 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 01:07:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
First image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Last image: 2461176.74493027 16.05.2026 05:52:31.975 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 74
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 38695
Objects passed selection criteria: 38617
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 37509.5
Average stars matched: 36423.5 (97.1047 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 140684 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat May 16 01:09:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461176.74439978
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:07.800 -01:59:52.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:07.800 -01:59:52.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0683 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:10.846 -02:00:25.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:10.846 -02:00:25.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0549 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:07.800 -01:59:52.03
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:10.846 -02:00:25.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01567 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.70YsTdtASj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7qIoxHraxa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lbEr1eQB2s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3ncc7ppYny
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to +3.7684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to 3.7684 deg
Loaded 4534 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3368 out of 3527 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3527 out of 6865 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.858600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.858600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to +3.7684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to 3.7684 deg
Loaded 4534 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3368 out of 3527 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3527 out of 6865 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 6283 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.6881 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3215 to +3.3059 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.6881 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3215 to 3.3059 deg
Loaded 4006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3333 out of 3439 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3439 out of 6283 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.3 pix Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
15.0 mag. Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.70YsTdtASj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, passed=6865
Got 6865 stars (including 6349 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=272 n_q2=182 n_q3=211 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7qIoxHraxa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=429, passed=6283
Got 6283 stars (including 5846 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6283 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.576 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.596 n_q1=260 n_q2=206 n_q3=204 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.404
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lbEr1eQB2s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=360, passed=5648
Got 5648 stars (including 5284 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5648 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5546 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5546 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5546 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.230 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.250 n_q1=282 n_q2=197 n_q3=207 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3ncc7ppYny (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=366, passed=5518
Got 5518 stars (including 5149 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5518 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=276 n_q2=203 n_q3=203 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.118
ref2=Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits sigma_overall=0.425 worst_q_ratio=1.404
new1=fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits sigma_overall=0.256 worst_q_ratio=1.162
new2=fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits sigma_overall=0.292 worst_q_ratio=1.169
reference average sigma_overall=0.38 worst_q_ratio=1.261
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267_astrometric_residuals.png (935 matched stars from wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614_astrometric_residuals.png (932 matched stars from wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071_astrometric_residuals.png (935 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072_astrometric_residuals.png (936 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:33:07.20 -00:32:23.4: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:33:07.20 -00:32:23.4: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:33:07.20 -00:32:23.4: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1925 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20430_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 20430_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:07.800 -01:59:52.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:07.800 -01:59:52.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0683 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:10.846 -02:00:25.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:10.846 -02:00:25.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0549 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:07.800 -01:59:52.03
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:10.846 -02:00:25.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01567 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Fsey1SE8gE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fcLrkiM6CA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MdazFeDBN5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8RP6Wy3fpY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to +3.7692 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to 3.7692 deg
Loaded 4538 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3208 out of 3567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3567 out of 43198 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.725950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.725950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to +3.7692 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to 3.7692 deg
Loaded 4538 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3208 out of 3567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3567 out of 43198 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 36035 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.6882 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3235 to +3.3190 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.6882 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3235 to 3.3190 deg
Loaded 4013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3249 out of 3501 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3501 out of 36035 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 57 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.2 pix Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
2.0 pix fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
15.1 mag. Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Fsey1SE8gE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=1997, passed=43167
Got 43167 stars (including 41100 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.310 n_q1=265 n_q2=181 n_q3=216 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fcLrkiM6CA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1833, passed=36030
Got 36030 stars (including 34148 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36030 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.608 n_q1=271 n_q2=194 n_q3=212 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.426
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MdazFeDBN5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1238, passed=35576
Got 35576 stars (including 34275 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35576 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.228 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.258 n_q1=284 n_q2=195 n_q3=206 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8RP6Wy3fpY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1304, passed=36356
Got 36356 stars (including 34994 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36356 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35482 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35483 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35483 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.287 n_q1=281 n_q2=190 n_q3=208 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-51-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0071.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-16_CI_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_010522_TTUQ1b1x1_2005913_x0OpXTpj/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:42:34.65 -03:33:18.1: 14.48 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:33:59.96 +00:00:45.5: 14.69 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:22:28.67 +00:49:04.9: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:17:18.16 -00:36:05.4: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:02:04.91 -05:27:31.9: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:22.23 -02:17:57.6: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:52:52.67 -01:12:42.5: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:22:28.67 +00:49:04.9: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:42:34.65 -03:33:18.1: 14.69 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:22:28.67 +00:49:04.9: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4155 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:42:34.65 -03:33:18.1: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5848 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:33:59.96 +00:00:45.5: 14.48 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:02:04.91 -05:27:31.9: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:17:18.16 -00:36:05.4: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:01:15.59 -04:41:40.6: 13.10 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:22.23 -02:17:57.6: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:33:59.96 +00:00:45.5: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6133 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:17:18.16 -00:36:05.4: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2119 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:22.23 -02:17:57.6: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3078 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:41:52.60 -03:30:29.0: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:52:52.67 -01:12:42.5: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:52.67 -01:12:42.5: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7922 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:01:15.59 -04:41:40.6: 13.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:15.59 -04:41:40.6: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5157 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:55:02.96 +02:02:17.1: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:32:44.87 +03:07:45.5: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:41:52.60 -03:30:29.0: 13.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:52.60 -03:30:29.0: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7110 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:37:20.80 -03:13:31.7: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:50:14.76 -03:53:04.7: 13.75 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:55:02.96 +02:02:17.1: 14.04 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:02.96 +02:02:17.1: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1553 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:51:00.07 +01:23:18.2: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:16:49.97 -02:37:24.8: 14.24 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:04:38.21 +02:17:46.9: 14.93 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:32:44.87 +03:07:45.5: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:32:44.87 +03:07:45.5: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9829 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:37:20.80 -03:13:31.7: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:50:14.76 -03:53:04.7: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:20.80 -03:13:31.7: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9942 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:14.76 -03:53:04.7: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9484 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:43.27 -02:20:37.2: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:51:00.07 +01:23:18.2: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:46:22.88 +01:15:48.0: 14.67 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:16:49.97 -02:37:24.8: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:16:49.97 -02:37:24.8: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2985 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:04:38.21 +02:17:46.9: 14.90 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:04:38.21 +02:17:46.9: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5765 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:43.27 -02:20:37.2: 14.58 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:43.27 -02:20:37.2: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3629 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:45:32.70 -02:40:20.7: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:39:43.70 -01:48:09.4: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:46:22.88 +01:15:48.0: 14.99 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:46:22.88 +01:15:48.0: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6471 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:55:51.85 +02:11:06.6: 15.02 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:05:37.30 +02:28:17.7: 14.62 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:05:37.30 +02:28:17.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:37.30 +02:28:17.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:45:32.70 -02:40:20.7: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:31:15.36 -05:08:29.7: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:23.84 +00:47:55.9: 15.18 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:39:43.70 -01:48:09.4: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:55:51.85 +02:11:06.6: 14.90 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:51.85 +02:11:06.6: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7485 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:09:10.48 -01:23:19.8: 14.78 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:21:45.94 +01:44:46.7: 15.08 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:31:15.36 -05:08:29.7: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:23.84 +00:47:55.9: 15.03 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:23.84 +00:47:55.9: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7989 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:09:10.48 -01:23:19.8: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:09:10.48 -01:23:19.8: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6618 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:27:41.19 -02:28:42.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:54.23 -00:38:17.2: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:21:45.94 +01:44:46.7: 15.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:21:45.94 +01:44:46.7: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7011 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:27:41.19 -02:28:42.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:54.23 -00:38:17.2: 14.87 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:01:17.08 +01:43:06.5: 14.86 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:54.23 -00:38:17.2: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7074 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:14:43.11 -03:29:36.2: 15.05 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:01:17.08 +01:43:06.5: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:54:28.61 +02:03:23.2: 15.17 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:17.08 +01:43:06.5: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.7568 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:14:43.11 -03:29:36.2: 15.15 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:14:43.11 -03:29:36.2: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8053 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:08:43.37 +02:14:15.3: 14.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:54:28.61 +02:03:23.2: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:28.61 +02:03:23.2: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8968 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:55:12.05 -00:58:49.6: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:08:43.37 +02:14:15.3: 15.17 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:08:43.37 +02:14:15.3: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8631 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:14:27.55 +01:49:05.8: 14.97 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:55:12.05 -00:58:49.6: 15.16 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:12.05 -00:58:49.6: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8761 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:10:52.38 -01:50:20.8: 14.94 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:14:27.55 +01:49:05.8: 14.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:14:27.55 +01:49:05.8: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9058 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:10:52.38 -01:50:20.8: 15.06 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:53.88 -00:44:04.9: 15.09 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:10:52.38 -01:50:20.8: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7657 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:53.88 -00:44:04.9: 14.98 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:53.88 -00:44:04.9: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8981 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:17:44.76 -03:07:30.5: 15.32 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:13:18.74 +03:15:27.8: 15.22 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:13:18.74 +03:15:27.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:13:18.74 +03:15:27.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:12.76 -01:16:21.1: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:17:44.76 -03:07:30.5: 14.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:17:44.76 -03:07:30.5: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8885 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:02.52 +00:14:39.8: 14.77 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:12.76 -01:16:21.1: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:12.76 -01:16:21.1: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9193 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:14:52.22 -03:05:28.5: 15.40 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:00:02.52 +00:14:39.8: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:02.52 +00:14:39.8: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8169 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:14:52.22 -03:05:28.5: 15.16 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:14:52.22 -03:05:28.5: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9218 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:32:06.37 -02:47:25.8: 14.98 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:15:42.16 -02:58:14.2: 15.34 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:32:06.37 -02:47:25.8: 14.86 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:32:06.37 -02:47:25.8: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7867 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:04:10.18 -05:46:60.0: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:15:42.16 -02:58:14.2: 15.15 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:04:23.62 -05:09:04.1: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:15:42.16 -02:58:14.2: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8382 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:04:10.18 -05:46:60.0: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:04:10.18 -05:46:60.0: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8838 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:04:23.62 -05:09:04.1: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:04:23.62 -05:09:04.1: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0015 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:05:03.69 -06:21:52.9: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:04:47.42 +01:59:48.0: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:05:03.69 -06:21:52.9: 13.76 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:05:03.69 -06:21:52.9: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3900 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:04:47.42 +01:59:48.0: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:04:47.42 +01:59:48.0: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5525 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52835.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52982.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53021.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53022.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53043.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53068.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52794_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52794_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52796_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52796_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:17:35.57 +02:19:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52797_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52797_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52799_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52799_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52803_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52803_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52833_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52833_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:42:08.68 +02:59:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52835_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
Preparing report for the candidate 52835_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52859_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52859_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:32:24.65 -01:02:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52862_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52862_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:06.42 -04:19:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52863_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52863_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52882_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52882_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52892_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52892_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:55:09.81 -07:16:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52898_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52898_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:33:50.04 +02:33:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52905_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52905_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52909_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52909_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52929_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52929_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:28:13.18 -02:15:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52932_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52932_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52939_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52939_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:58:39.39 -02:53:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52943_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52943_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52944_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52944_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52952_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52952_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52966_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52966_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:28:11.80 -02:15:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52982_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
Preparing report for the candidate 52982_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52994_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52994_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52995_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52995_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52996_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 52996_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53016_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53016_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53021_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
Preparing report for the candidate 53021_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53022_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
Preparing report for the candidate 53022_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53024_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53024_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53036_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53036_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53043_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
Preparing report for the candidate 53043_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53050_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53050_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53061_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53061_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53065_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53065_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53066_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53066_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:49:01.12 +00:54:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53068_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
Preparing report for the candidate 53068_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53090_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53090_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53097_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53097_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53100_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53100_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53101_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53101_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53109_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53109_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53110_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53110_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53114_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53114_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53116_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53116_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53128_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53128_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53142_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53142_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53143_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53143_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53157_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53157_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53164_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53164_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53191_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53191_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53194_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53194_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53206_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 53206_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50105_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 50105_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50082_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 50082_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50042_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 50042_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50023_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072
The candidate 50023_fd_Vir-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_00-52-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0072 did not pass the final checks
