This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.1270 2461176.6270 10.21 07:48:38.49 +00:16:59.7
219.30520 12.83189 galactic CMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J074839+0017.1
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.320 V Y 0.450 V 2452151.30000 100.913035000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:48:38.49 +00:16:59.7: 11.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:48:38.49 +00:16:59.7: 11.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.23 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J074839+0017.1,2461176.6270,10.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J074839+0017.1 20260516.1270 10.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.1270 2461176.6270 11.44 07:29:21.17 +00:49:53.2
216.53889 8.81043 galactic CMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 2.5 pix
The object was found in VSX19" NSVS 12691747
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.680 R1 Y 0.100 R1
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:29:21.17 +00:49:53.2: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:29:21.17 +00:49:53.2: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 12691747,2461176.6270,11.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 12691747 20260516.1270 11.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.1270 2461176.6270 12.16 07:45:16.02 +01:10:51.4
218.08878 12.50190 galactic CMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 2.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" UW CMi
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.600 V 15.000 : V 2454935.00000 344.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:45:16.02 +01:10:51.4: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:45:16.02 +01:10:51.4: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
UW CMi,2461176.6270,12.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
UW CMi 20260516.1270 12.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.1270 2461176.6270 11.19 07:46:54.16 +00:59:16.5
218.45816 12.77485 galactic CMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 2.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J074654+0059.3
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.430 V Y 0.520 V 2452315.60000 123.811123000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:46:54.16 +00:59:16.5: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:46:54.16 +00:59:16.5: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J074654+0059.3,2461176.6270,11.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J074654+0059.3 20260516.1270 11.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.1270 2461176.6270 12.69 07:28:45.53 +02:05:50.5
215.33046 9.25798 galactic CMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 2.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 8" NSVS 12690901
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.070 R1 Y 0.120 R1
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:28:45.53 +02:05:50.5: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:28:45.53 +02:05:50.5: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 12690901,2461176.6270,12.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 12690901 20260516.1270 12.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.71842801 11.02.2026 05:14:22.180 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
First image: 2461082.71842801 11.02.2026 05:14:22.180 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Last image: 2461176.62722206 16.05.2026 03:03:01.986 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.87
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18023
Objects passed selection criteria: 17933
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12601
Average stars matched: 12288.2 (97.5181 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 125440 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 15 22:05:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.71842801 11.02.2026 05:14:22.180 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
First image: 2461082.71842801 11.02.2026 05:14:22.180 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Last image: 2461176.62722206 16.05.2026 03:03:01.986 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 179
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 39 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 128414
Objects passed selection criteria: 128072
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 92868.5
Average stars matched: 89240.2 (96.0931 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1972860 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 15 22:10:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461176.62678941
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits'
wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits'
wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:42:52.058 -02:00:25.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:42:41.451 -02:01:53.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:42:52.058 -02:00:25.11
Second-epoch image center 07:42:41.451 -02:01:53.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0505 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:42:42.015 -02:02:04.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:42:52.058 -02:00:25.11
Second-epoch image center 07:42:42.015 -02:02:04.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0502 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:42:41.451 -02:01:53.17
Second-epoch second image center 07:42:42.015 -02:02:04.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00403 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TvnECkp6Fa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6nZ5GXCMkh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VhTIpOd3eX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F8Tr1M72Pw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29353 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 107.8097 to 123.6686 deg, Dec -7.3144 to +3.3249 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 107.8097 to 123.6686 deg, Dec -7.3144 to 3.3249 deg
Loaded 18107 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13867 out of 15465 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15465 out of 29353 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.877600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.877600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.87
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.01
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.01
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29353 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 107.8097 to 123.6686 deg, Dec -7.3144 to +3.3249 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 107.8097 to 123.6686 deg, Dec -7.3144 to 3.3249 deg
Loaded 18107 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13867 out of 15465 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15465 out of 29353 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 29091 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 107.8035 to 123.6655 deg, Dec -7.3214 to +3.3156 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 107.8035 to 123.6655 deg, Dec -7.3214 to 3.3156 deg
Loaded 18126 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13772 out of 15443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15443 out of 29091 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.5 pix Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
2.4 pix fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
2.4 pix fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
15.0 mag. Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.TvnECkp6Fa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3313, passed=29353
Got 29353 stars (including 26003 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29353 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.460 n_q1=180 n_q2=252 n_q3=201 n_q4=323 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.018
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits -region wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6nZ5GXCMkh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3386, passed=29091
Got 29091 stars (including 25669 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29091 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.571 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.458 n_q1=173 n_q2=253 n_q3=209 n_q4=324 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.099
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits -region wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VhTIpOd3eX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=399, passed=6917
Got 6917 stars (including 6514 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6917 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6601 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6601 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.635 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.907 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.609 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.143 n_q1=319 n_q2=256 n_q3=297 n_q4=71 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.800
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.F8Tr1M72Pw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=341, passed=6609
Got 6609 stars (including 6265 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6609 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6310 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.809 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.410 n_q1=310 n_q2=278 n_q3=287 n_q4=72 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits sigma_overall=0.457 worst_q_ratio=1.018
ref2=Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits sigma_overall=0.519 worst_q_ratio=1.099
new1=fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits sigma_overall=0.635 worst_q_ratio=1.800
new2=fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits sigma_overall=0.620 worst_q_ratio=2.274
reference average sigma_overall=0.488 worst_q_ratio=1.0585
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 2nd new image (fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits) flagged: sigma=0.620 (ref avg 0.488), ratio=2.274 (ref avg 1.0585), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 6299 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2550893.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2550893.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 60.1426 (1.31702e+26), 12 match, 0 conflict, 40 distractors, 47 index.
RA,Dec = (115.69,-2.0221), pixel scale 5.93147 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +-----+--+--+--+---+-+--+--+--+--------+-----------+(best)---------------------------------------------+--
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2550893.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2550893.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (115.675723, -2.033532) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:42:42.174, -02:02:00.714).
Field size: 15.7332 x 10.53 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.275 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits' -> 'fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 15 22:07 fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 15 22:07 out2550893.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits (fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2550893.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2550893.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.6583 degrees of RA,Dec (115.675,-2.03437)
log-odds ratio 34.2855 (7.76229e+14), 4 match, 0 conflict, 1 distractors, 17 index.
RA,Dec = (115.68,-2.03287), pixel scale 5.94674 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++-+(best)---+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2550893.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2550893.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (115.673365, -2.032727) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:42:41.608, -02:01:57.817).
Field size: 15.7339 x 10.5302 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.272 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M May 15 22:07 fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K May 15 22:07 out2550893.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 35470 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.3666, 949.904] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 33.8895 (5.22433e+14), 12 match, 0 conflict, 229 distractors, 12 index.
RA,Dec = (115.674,-2.03189), pixel scale 5.95178 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --------------+--+----------+-----+--+--------------------+----------------+------------------------
--> log-odds 33.8895
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 86.2011 (2.73321e+37), 17 match, 0 conflict, 447 distractors, 17 index.
RA,Dec = (115.674,-2.03189), pixel scale 5.95178 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+----------+--+----------++----+--+--------------------+------------+---+------------------------
--> log-odds 86.2011
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 263.394 (2.45769e+114), 39 match, 0 conflict, 202 distractors, 48 index.
RA,Dec = (115.674,-2.03189), pixel scale 5.95178 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++-----+---+--+-++--+----++----+-++---+-----+----------+------+-----+---+-----------------+------
--> log-odds 263.394
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 565.935 (6.06038e+245), 81 match, 0 conflict, 476 distractors, 90 index.
RA,Dec = (115.674,-2.03189), pixel scale 5.95178 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++--+--+---++-++++-++-+--+++---+-++---+-----+---+---++-+----+-+-----+---+--++-+----+-----++------
--> log-odds 565.935
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1123.98 (inf), 160 match, 0 conflict, 669 distractors, 198 index.
RA,Dec = (115.674,-2.03189), pixel scale 5.95178 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++-++-++++-++++-++-++-+++---++++---+++---+---+++-+-++++-++-++-+--+---+--++++--+++---+-++++--+-
--> log-odds 1123.98
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 2047.49 (inf), 291 match, 1 conflict, 855 distractors, 368 index.
RA,Dec = (115.674,-2.03189), pixel scale 5.95178 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++-+++++++-+++++++-++++++---++++++++++++-+--++++-+--++++++-+++++++--++-++++++-+++---++++++--++
--> log-odds 2047.49
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3450.04 (inf), 570 match, 2 conflict, 2538 distractors, 731 index.
RA,Dec = (115.674,-2.03189), pixel scale 5.95178 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++-+++++++-+++++++-++++++---++++++++++++-+--++++-+--++++++-+++++-+--++++++-++++++---++++++--++
--> log-odds 3450.04
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6417.32 (inf), 1159 match, 2 conflict, 4850 distractors, 1448 index.
RA,Dec = (115.674,-2.03189), pixel scale 5.95178 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++-+++++++-+++++++-++++++---++++++++++++-+--++++++--++++++-+++++++--++++++-++++++---++++++--++
--> log-odds 6417.32
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.3666, 949.904] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 33.8895 (5.22433e+14), 12 match, 0 conflict, 229 distractors, 12 index.
RA,Dec = (115.674,-2.03189), pixel scale 5.95178 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --------------+--+----------+-----+--+--------------------+----------------+------------------------
--> log-odds 33.8895
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 86.2011 (2.73321e+37), 17 match, 0 conflict, 447 distractors, 17 index.
RA,Dec = (115.674,-2.03189), pixel scale 5.95178 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+----------+--+----------++----+--+--------------------+------------+---+------------------------
--> log-odds 86.2011
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 263.394 (2.45769e+114), 39 match, 0 conflict, 202 distractors, 48 index.
RA,Dec = (115.674,-2.03189), pixel scale 5.95178 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++-----+---+--+-++--+----++----+-++---+-----+----------+------+-----+---+-----------------+------
--> log-odds 263.394
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 565.935 (6.06038e+245), 81 match, 0 conflict, 476 distractors, 90 index.
RA,Dec = (115.674,-2.03189), pixel scale 5.95178 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++--+--+---++-++++-++-+--+++---+-++---+-----+---+---++-+----+-+-----+---+--++-+----+-----++------
--> log-odds 565.935
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1123.98 (inf), 160 match, 0 conflict, 669 distractors, 198 index.
RA,Dec = (115.674,-2.03189), pixel scale 5.95178 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++-++-++++-++++-++-++-+++---++++---+++---+---+++-+-++++-++-++-+--+---+--++++--+++---+-++++--+-
--> log-odds 1123.98
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 2047.49 (inf), 291 match, 1 conflict, 855 distractors, 368 index.
RA,Dec = (115.674,-2.03189), pixel scale 5.95178 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++-+++++++-+++++++-++++++---++++++++++++-+--++++-+--++++++-+++++++--++-++++++-+++---++++++--++
--> log-odds 2047.49
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3450.04 (inf), 570 match, 2 conflict, 2538 distractors, 731 index.
RA,Dec = (115.674,-2.03189), pixel scale 5.95178 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++-+++++++-+++++++-++++++---++++++++++++-+--++++-+--++++++-+++++-+--++++++-++++++---++++++--++
--> log-odds 3450.04
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6417.32 (inf), 1159 match, 2 conflict, 4850 distractors, 1448 index.
RA,Dec = (115.674,-2.03189), pixel scale 5.95178 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+++++++-+++++++-+++++++-++++++---++++++++++++-+--++++++--++++++-+++++++--++++++-++++++---++++++--++
--> log-odds 6417.32
Got 16 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (115.675650, -2.033865) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:42:42.156, -02:02:01.916).
Field size: 15.7341 x 10.531 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 179.273 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Image size: 939.7'x625.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:42:41.960 -02:02:04.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6609 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2554510.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=341, passed=6609
Got 6609 stars (including 6265 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6609 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013051 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010441 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.02"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.17"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6213 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.03"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.04"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 987)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=2.013 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.225 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.576 sigma_q4_arcsec=2.241 n_q1=306 n_q2=275 n_q3=281 n_q4=71 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 2nd new image (fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits): sigma 0.620->2.013, ratio 2.274->1.114; reverting to order 3
WARNING: 2nd new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=2.013 -- 4.12x the reference average (0.488); plate solution may be of low accuracy
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:25:16.46 -04:37:01.3: 9.37 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:48:38.49 +00:16:59.7: 11.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:25:16.46 -04:37:01.3: 9.37 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.37 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:16.46 -04:37:01.3: ref_mag=9.37 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5056 delta=-1.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:48:38.49 +00:16:59.7: 11.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.23 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:48:38.49 +00:16:59.7: ref_mag=11.23 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2015 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07212.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31212_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 31212_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:00.78 -02:35:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31218_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 31218_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:47.54 -05:13:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31224_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 31224_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31227_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 31227_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:46.12 -05:52:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07212_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 07212_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08913_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 08913_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:04.49 -00:23:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20606_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 20606_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:58:59.09 -04:30:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Mon-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:48:38.49 +00:16:59.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:42:52.058 -02:00:25.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:42:41.451 -02:01:53.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:42:52.058 -02:00:25.11
Second-epoch image center 07:42:41.451 -02:01:53.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0505 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:42:42.015 -02:02:04.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:42:52.058 -02:00:25.11
Second-epoch image center 07:42:42.015 -02:02:04.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0502 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:42:41.451 -02:01:53.17
Second-epoch second image center 07:42:42.015 -02:02:04.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00403 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NL8s6hsbD2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZuhXhdwEdR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9LTV1eOtzw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits &> /tmp/tmp.D5npC7n3xY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits and wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 193105 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 107.8048 to 123.6800 deg, Dec -7.3160 to +3.3248 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 107.8048 to 123.6800 deg, Dec -7.3160 to 3.3248 deg
Loaded 18131 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10814 out of 16280 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16280 out of 193105 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.694900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.694900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 193105 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 107.8048 to 123.6800 deg, Dec -7.3160 to +3.3248 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 107.8048 to 123.6800 deg, Dec -7.3160 to 3.3248 deg
Loaded 18131 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10814 out of 16280 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16280 out of 193105 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 195942 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 107.7949 to 123.6675 deg, Dec -7.3254 to +3.3168 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 107.7949 to 123.6675 deg, Dec -7.3254 to 3.3168 deg
Loaded 18158 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10668 out of 16287 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16287 out of 195942 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 103 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.1 pix Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
2.4 pix fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
2.4 pix fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
15.2 mag. Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.NL8s6hsbD2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=41, blended=29687, passed=193064
Got 193064 stars (including 163113 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 193064 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.425 n_q1=186 n_q2=227 n_q3=242 n_q4=297 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits -region wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZuhXhdwEdR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=40, blended=30373, passed=195902
Got 195902 stars (including 165212 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 195902 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 190561 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 190558 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 190551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.460 n_q1=182 n_q2=237 n_q3=250 n_q4=286 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.073
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits -region wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9LTV1eOtzw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=3428, passed=51186
Got 51186 stars (including 47709 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51186 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48385 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.642 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.898 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.610 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.390 n_q1=330 n_q2=233 n_q3=314 n_q4=68 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.164
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.D5npC7n3xY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=3222, passed=48904
Got 48904 stars (including 45634 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48904 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.608 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.849 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.386 n_q1=325 n_q2=247 n_q3=310 n_q4=62 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.282
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-02-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0002.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_220337_TTUQ2b1x1_2531054_DqkRqyid/wcs_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:40:07.31 +00:38:33.1: 11.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:25:08.16 -04:25:14.3: 11.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 08:09:56.34 +01:33:23.1: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:25:16.44 -04:37:01.4: 9.35 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:26:49.71 -05:14:27.5: 10.07 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:25:59.37 -04:47:01.1: 10.13 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:40:07.31 +00:38:33.1: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.31 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:07.31 +00:38:33.1: ref_mag=11.31 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7080 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:25:08.16 -04:25:14.3: 11.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 08:09:56.34 +01:33:23.1: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:08.16 -04:25:14.3: ref_mag=11.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2481 delta=-0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:09:56.34 +01:33:23.1: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6050 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:25:16.44 -04:37:01.4: 9.36 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.36 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:16.44 -04:37:01.4: ref_mag=9.36 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5132 delta=-1.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:25:52.63 -04:55:34.9: 10.07 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:26:49.71 -05:14:27.5: 10.07 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:25:59.37 -04:47:01.1: 10.13 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.07 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:49.71 -05:14:27.5: ref_mag=10.07 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3569 delta=-1.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.13 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:59.37 -04:47:01.1: ref_mag=10.13 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2374 delta=-1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:27:21.73 -05:12:30.2: 10.77 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:25:52.63 -04:55:34.9: 10.08 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.08 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:52.63 -04:55:34.9: ref_mag=10.08 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3276 delta=-1.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:25:43.46 -04:43:47.2: 11.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:26:08.00 -04:43:26.0: 10.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:25:36.41 -04:50:39.0: 10.71 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:47:41.60 +01:11:47.5: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:25:41.45 -04:40:41.0: 11.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:27:21.73 -05:12:30.2: 10.75 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.76 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:21.73 -05:12:30.2: ref_mag=10.76 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3720 delta=-0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:25:43.46 -04:43:47.2: 11.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:26:08.00 -04:43:26.0: 10.93 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.08 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.93 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:43.46 -04:43:47.2: ref_mag=11.08 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8664 delta=-0.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:25:36.41 -04:50:39.0: 10.71 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:08.00 -04:43:26.0: ref_mag=10.93 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7566 delta=-0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.71 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:36.41 -04:50:39.0: ref_mag=10.71 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8202 delta=-1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:47:41.60 +01:11:47.5: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:47:41.60 +01:11:47.5: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4203 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:25:41.45 -04:40:41.0: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.30 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:41.45 -04:40:41.0: ref_mag=11.30 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8966 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:25:39.34 -04:53:43.9: 10.82 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:25:27.11 -04:57:12.0: 10.81 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:33:15.24 +00:08:47.4: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:25:39.34 -04:53:43.9: 10.83 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:39:02.37 +00:58:30.0: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.83 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:39.34 -04:53:43.9: ref_mag=10.83 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9252 delta=-1.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:25:27.11 -04:57:12.0: 10.83 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.82 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:27.11 -04:57:12.0: ref_mag=10.82 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.0033 delta=-1.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:43:28.15 -04:40:14.6: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:26:07.20 -04:57:03.4: 10.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:33:15.24 +00:08:47.4: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:39:02.37 +00:58:30.0: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:15.24 +00:08:47.4: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2681 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:39:02.37 +00:58:30.0: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6358 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:43:28.15 -04:40:14.6: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:43:28.15 -04:40:14.6: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4352 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:26:07.20 -04:57:03.4: 10.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.82 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:07.20 -04:57:03.4: ref_mag=10.82 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7595 delta=-0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:26:11.74 -04:58:03.5: 10.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:25:08.78 -05:31:35.8: 9.07 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:44:58.27 -01:19:20.2: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:26:11.74 -04:58:03.5: 10.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.91 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:11.74 -04:58:03.5: ref_mag=10.91 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9946 delta=-1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:25:57.79 -05:01:08.7: 11.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:25:08.78 -05:31:35.8: 9.09 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.08 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:08.78 -05:31:35.8: ref_mag=9.08 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.3223 delta=-3.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:44:58.27 -01:19:20.2: 12.72 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:44:58.27 -01:19:20.2: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9256 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:25:57.79 -05:01:08.7: 11.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.33 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:57.79 -05:01:08.7: ref_mag=11.33 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.4105 delta=-1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:50:43.30 -00:07:59.0: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:53:39.29 -05:05:45.8: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:26:11.86 -04:56:17.3: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:27:09.56 -05:34:43.3: 9.33 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:29:53.35 -05:42:28.6: 10.60 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:50:43.30 -00:07:59.0: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:50:43.30 -00:07:59.0: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0936 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:53:39.29 -05:05:45.8: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:53:39.29 -05:05:45.8: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8947 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:26:11.01 -04:48:43.1: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:26:29.82 -05:03:30.6: 11.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:26:11.86 -04:56:17.3: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:27:09.56 -05:34:43.3: 9.33 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:11.86 -04:56:17.3: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3908 delta=-0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:29:53.35 -05:42:28.6: 10.58 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.33 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:09.56 -05:34:43.3: ref_mag=9.33 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.4729 delta=-3.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.59 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:53.35 -05:42:28.6: ref_mag=10.59 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.6091 delta=-2.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:26:11.01 -04:48:43.1: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:11.01 -04:48:43.1: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6593 delta=-0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:26:29.82 -05:03:30.6: 11.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:29.82 -05:03:30.6: ref_mag=11.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5107 delta=-1.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:29:21.17 +00:49:53.2: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:26:59.72 -04:48:58.4: 11.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:53:29.65 -06:04:17.1: 11.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:29:21.17 +00:49:53.2: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:29:21.17 +00:49:53.2: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4282 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:45:16.02 +01:10:51.4: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:26:59.72 -04:48:58.4: 11.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.15 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:59.72 -04:48:58.4: ref_mag=11.15 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.2299 delta=-1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:46:54.16 +00:59:16.5: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:26:04.57 -04:41:13.5: 11.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:53:29.65 -06:04:17.1: 11.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:53:29.65 -06:04:17.1: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3015 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:25:27.17 -04:26:17.9: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:45:16.02 +01:10:51.4: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:45:16.02 +01:10:51.4: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1632 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:46:54.16 +00:59:16.5: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:46:54.16 +00:59:16.5: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1933 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:26:04.57 -04:41:13.5: 11.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.07 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:04.57 -04:41:13.5: ref_mag=11.07 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.0815 delta=-1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:25:27.17 -04:26:17.9: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:27.17 -04:26:17.9: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3932 delta=-0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-14-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0184.fits at 07:28:45.53 +02:05:50.5: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_23-15-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0185.fits at 07:28:45.53 +02:05:50.5: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:28:45.53 +02:05:50.5: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6924 delta=1.24 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16812.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31880.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35323.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36607.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217216_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217216_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:45.09 -00:00:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217226_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217226_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:18.41 -00:09:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217228_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217228_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217231_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217231_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:14.62 +01:30:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217232_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217232_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217236_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217236_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217237_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217237_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:00.78 -02:35:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217244_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217244_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:47.52 -05:13:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217250_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217250_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217253_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217253_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:46.09 -05:52:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217255_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217255_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217259_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217259_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:08:36.91 -02:57:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217260_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217260_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:06.31 +00:01:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217270_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217270_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217271_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217271_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:46.38 -00:35:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217280_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217280_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217281_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217281_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:15.57 -05:57:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217283_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217283_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217284_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217284_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217290_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217290_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:54.29 -05:25:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217293_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217293_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:04:59.74 +00:04:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217295_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217295_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217301_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217301_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:07.48 -06:19:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217307_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217307_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217308_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217308_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217309_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217309_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217310_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217310_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:28.68 +00:35:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217311_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217311_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217314_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217314_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217315_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217315_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:10.17 -03:04:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217316_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217316_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:02:07.40 -00:27:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217320_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217320_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:54.42 +00:38:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217321_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217321_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:23.89 -00:17:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217323_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217323_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217324_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217324_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:52.70 -05:24:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217325_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217325_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217326_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217326_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217331_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217331_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217334_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217334_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:02:41.34 -02:07:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217336_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217336_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217338_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217338_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:56.35 -05:31:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217340_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217340_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217341_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217341_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:36.28 +01:45:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217342_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217342_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:59.88 +00:04:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217346_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217346_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217347_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217347_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:08:22.83 +00:27:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217348_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217348_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217353_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217353_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:04:45.27 -00:06:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217364_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217364_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:03.56 -00:15:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217365_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217365_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:14.66 +00:54:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217368_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217368_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:13.38 -02:37:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217371_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217371_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217372_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217372_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217375_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217375_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:18.28 +01:45:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217381_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217381_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:59:44.32 -03:42:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217386_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217386_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:08:01.40 -03:42:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217389_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217389_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217396_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217396_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:04.47 -03:39:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217399_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217399_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:32.46 +00:28:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217401_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217401_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:01.03 -02:42:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217402_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217402_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217403_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217403_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.88 +00:39:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217405_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217405_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:18.90 +02:10:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217407_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217407_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217414_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217414_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217416_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217416_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.26 -05:30:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217425_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217425_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:06:50.99 -05:16:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217426_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217426_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:55.03 -00:14:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217427_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217427_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:58:11.54 -00:47:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217429_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217429_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:22.39 -02:02:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217430_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217430_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:14.96 +00:36:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217431_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217431_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:07:54.20 -01:19:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217432_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217432_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:48.22 +00:50:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217434_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217434_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:34.46 -06:00:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217437_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217437_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217443_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217443_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:43.32 -04:35:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217444_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217444_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217448_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217448_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:49.31 -00:02:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217451_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217451_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217454_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217454_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:49.12 -00:16:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217457_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217457_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217466_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217466_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217469_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217469_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:58.95 +00:05:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217479_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217479_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:58.85 +00:06:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217482_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217482_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217484_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217484_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:22.55 +00:53:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217488_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217488_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217495_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 217495_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:19.19 -00:07:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47462_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 47462_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:38.47 +00:16:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36607_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 36607_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148640_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 148640_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94541_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 94541_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:25.27 -02:18:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66719_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 66719_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:36.59 -00:53:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31880_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 31880_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141008_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 141008_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:58:59.13 -04:30:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172606_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 172606_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35323_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 35323_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59094_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 59094_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:04.49 -00:23:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63856_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 63856_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:05.21 -00:43:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204796_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 204796_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204794_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 204794_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38666_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003
The candidate 38666_fd_Mon-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-03-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0003 did not pass the final checks
