This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.1260 2461176.6260 13.25 07:08:43.31 +15:12:41.5
201.16914 10.62314 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.80 Sappho 1 2 2 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:08:43.31 +15:12:41.5: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:08:43.31 +15:12:41.5: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461176.6260,13.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260516.1260 13.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.1260 2461176.6260 12.72 06:51:18.09 +12:43:22.6
201.55515 5.73385 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J065117.99+124320.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.400 V 15.170 V 2457675.00000 172.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:51:18.09 +12:43:22.6: 14.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:51:18.09 +12:43:22.6: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J065117.99+124320.3,2461176.6260,12.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J065117.99+124320.3 20260516.1260 12.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.1260 2461176.6260 12.65 07:10:50.55 +12:22:18.3
203.99710 9.85832 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J071050.68+122216.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.660 V 14.800 V 2458375.51950 126.197049200000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:10:50.55 +12:22:18.3: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:10:50.55 +12:22:18.3: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J071050.68+122216.0,2461176.6260,12.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J071050.68+122216.0 20260516.1260 12.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.1260 2461176.6260 13.14 06:52:26.13 +13:03:07.8
201.38304 6.12813 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J065226.02+130306.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.510 V 15.050 V 2458492.00220 72.311923300000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:52:26.13 +13:03:07.8: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:52:26.13 +13:03:07.8: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J065226.02+130306.0,2461176.6260,13.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J065226.02+130306.0 20260516.1260 13.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 16.1260 2461176.6260 12.47 06:49:23.74 +12:47:01.7
201.29142 5.34559 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS 9854286
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.800 R1 12.300 R1
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:23.74 +12:47:01.7: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:23.74 +12:47:01.7: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 9854286,2461176.6260,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 9854286 20260516.1260 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461176.62632295 16.05.2026 03:01:44.303 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15762
Objects passed selection criteria: 15714
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14119.5
Average stars matched: 12996 (92.0429 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 126020 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 15 22:05:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461176.62632295 16.05.2026 03:01:44.303 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 76
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 48 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 122016
Objects passed selection criteria: 121661
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 107205
Average stars matched: 99410.8 (92.7298 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1983164 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 15 22:08:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461176.62572769
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:53.386 +14:00:50.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:53.386 +14:00:50.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0469 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:55.862 +14:01:06.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:55.862 +14:01:06.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0575 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:53.386 +14:00:50.84
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:55.862 +14:01:06.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01094 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.siesyOBItl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HJaQ4VUpLl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eS6dy3h4xK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hurkl3B3uU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec +8.4660 to +19.3435 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec 8.4660 to 19.3435 deg
Loaded 18981 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13233 out of 14919 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14919 out of 28861 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.900200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.900200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec +8.4660 to +19.3435 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec 8.4660 to 19.3435 deg
Loaded 18981 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13233 out of 14919 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14919 out of 28861 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 25465 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3423 to 114.8448 deg, Dec +8.5622 to +19.2817 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3423 to 114.8448 deg, Dec 8.5622 to 19.2817 deg
Loaded 18666 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13861 out of 14947 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14947 out of 25465 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.6 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
14.9 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.siesyOBItl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3379, passed=28861
Got 28861 stars (including 25451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28178 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.453 n_q1=224 n_q2=241 n_q3=224 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HJaQ4VUpLl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2216, passed=25458
Got 25458 stars (including 23222 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25080 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.699 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.856 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.781 n_q1=186 n_q2=289 n_q3=176 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eS6dy3h4xK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=474, passed=8373
Got 8373 stars (including 7893 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8373 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8168 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8168 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.662 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.666 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.157 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.639 n_q1=53 n_q2=257 n_q3=298 n_q4=307 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.749
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hurkl3B3uU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=648, passed=10034
Got 10034 stars (including 9381 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10034 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.613 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.895 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.599 n_q1=112 n_q2=267 n_q3=272 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.461
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits sigma_overall=0.497 worst_q_ratio=1.178
ref2=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits sigma_overall=0.699 worst_q_ratio=1.224
new1=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits sigma_overall=0.662 worst_q_ratio=1.749
new2=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits sigma_overall=0.613 worst_q_ratio=1.461
reference average sigma_overall=0.598 worst_q_ratio=1.201
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034_astrometric_residuals.png (924 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000_astrometric_residuals.png (915 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001_astrometric_residuals.png (915 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34443_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 34443_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:39.32 +10:34:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34447_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 34447_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:27.60 +12:18:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:53.386 +14:00:50.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:53.386 +14:00:50.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0469 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:55.862 +14:01:06.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:55.862 +14:01:06.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0575 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:53.386 +14:00:50.84
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:55.862 +14:01:06.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01094 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FsiCkDdLLR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LdOXDWmJdl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6feHx9Z0Z9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.591gc3r1xI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec +8.4571 to +19.3472 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec 8.4571 to 19.3472 deg
Loaded 19031 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10041 out of 15738 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15738 out of 208537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.735000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.735000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec +8.4571 to +19.3472 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec 8.4571 to 19.3472 deg
Loaded 19031 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10041 out of 15738 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15738 out of 208537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 174030 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3423 to 114.8515 deg, Dec +8.5562 to +19.2862 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3423 to 114.8515 deg, Dec 8.5562 to 19.2862 deg
Loaded 18685 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11872 out of 16121 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16121 out of 174030 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 63 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.2 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FsiCkDdLLR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=42, blended=33805, passed=208495
Got 208495 stars (including 174392 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 208495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204249 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.467 n_q1=233 n_q2=236 n_q3=201 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.187
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LdOXDWmJdl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=45, blended=23358, passed=173985
Got 173985 stars (including 150470 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173985 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171617 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171615 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171612 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.650 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.864 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.806 n_q1=202 n_q2=267 n_q3=177 n_q4=281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.330
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6feHx9Z0Z9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=5649, passed=60165
Got 60165 stars (including 54477 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60165 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58497 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58497 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58497 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 910 stars left (next iteration limit 1001)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits N_match=910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.741 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.835 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.184 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.740 n_q1=66 n_q2=233 n_q3=309 n_q4=302 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.598
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.591gc3r1xI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=6756, passed=71333
Got 71333 stars (including 64530 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71333 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69033 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69030 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 905 stars left (next iteration limit 995)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.612 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.934 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.578 n_q1=122 n_q2=235 n_q3=299 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.525
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:05:55.13 +11:38:05.5: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:53:27.47 +10:51:26.3: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:54:27.55 +14:22:40.3: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:02:08.67 +10:45:44.8: 15.06 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:50:24.89 +14:53:24.9: 13.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:59:04.48 +13:06:36.8: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:50:24.89 +14:53:24.9: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:05:55.13 +11:38:05.5: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:54:27.55 +14:22:40.3: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:53:27.47 +10:51:26.3: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:02:08.67 +10:45:44.8: 15.22 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:59:04.48 +13:06:36.8: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:50:24.89 +14:53:24.9: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8382 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:55.13 +11:38:05.5: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2954 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:27.55 +14:22:40.3: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3837 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:02:08.67 +10:45:44.8: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.0967 delta=2.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:27.47 +10:51:26.3: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1962 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:04.48 +13:06:36.8: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0578 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:13:57.97 +11:51:49.0: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:55.34 +11:53:56.1: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:05:28.28 +10:33:03.1: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:23:10.17 +10:19:45.7: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:55.34 +11:53:56.1: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:13:57.97 +11:51:49.0: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:55.34 +11:53:56.1: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9051 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:57.97 +11:51:49.0: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0745 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:05:28.28 +10:33:03.1: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:23:10.17 +10:19:45.7: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:28.28 +10:33:03.1: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1762 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:10.17 +10:19:45.7: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4004 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:08:43.31 +15:12:41.5: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:17:01.69 +14:07:50.6: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:17:01.69 +14:07:50.6: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:08:43.31 +15:12:41.5: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:01.69 +14:07:50.6: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2656 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:04:48.33 +13:59:08.1: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:01:32.81 +14:55:18.1: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:51:18.09 +12:43:22.6: 14.03 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:10:50.55 +12:22:18.3: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:52:26.13 +13:03:07.8: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:02:36.74 +14:56:10.0: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:01:32.81 +14:55:18.1: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:51:18.09 +12:43:22.6: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:32.81 +14:55:18.1: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9387 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:51:18.09 +12:43:22.6: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.7242 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:04:48.33 +13:59:08.1: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:48.33 +13:59:08.1: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3830 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:10:50.55 +12:22:18.3: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:10:50.55 +12:22:18.3: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6481 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:52:26.13 +13:03:07.8: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:52:26.13 +13:03:07.8: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1406 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:02:36.74 +14:56:10.0: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:36.74 +14:56:10.0: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0638 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:23.74 +12:47:01.7: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:23.74 +12:47:01.7: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:49:23.74 +12:47:01.7: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4718 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out249090.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out249220.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72111.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82670.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84373.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out89457.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249064_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249064_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:23.61 +11:08:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249068_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249068_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249070_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249070_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249072_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249072_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249075_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249075_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:12.22 +12:44:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249078_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249078_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249080_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249080_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:36.73 +10:57:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249082_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249082_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:01.38 +13:45:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249083_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249083_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249090_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249090_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:08.67 +10:45:44.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.503 3159649251728059008 105.53566827694 +10.76191343011 12.1156 10.3718 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.503#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249104_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249104_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:53.63 +11:05:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249115_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249115_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:14.24 +13:51:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249130_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249130_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:08.06 +16:04:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249133_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249133_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:13.21 +15:07:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249134_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249134_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:05.68 +13:23:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249135_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249135_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:29.08 +12:08:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249143_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249143_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:50.03 +12:33:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249154_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249154_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:16.53 +15:18:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249161_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249161_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:14.37 +10:36:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249162_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249162_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:40.67 +16:56:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249164_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249164_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:13.82 +15:03:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249165_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249165_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:31.35 +10:56:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249170_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249170_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249171_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249171_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:06.00 +11:00:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249173_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249173_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:09.35 +14:14:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249177_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249177_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.08 +14:13:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249182_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249182_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249184_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249184_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:05.28 +12:20:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249186_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249186_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:53.95 +12:25:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249188_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249188_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249194_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249194_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249201_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249201_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:28.23 +15:40:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249203_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249203_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:59.38 +13:05:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249204_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249204_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:07.36 +10:23:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249205_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249205_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:32.79 +10:25:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249215_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249215_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:25.32 +13:44:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249216_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249216_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:08.05 +13:38:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249217_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249217_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249220_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 249220_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249227_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249227_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:30.02 +10:54:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249230_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249230_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:35.80 +14:21:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249238_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249238_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:03.75 +11:01:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249241_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249241_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:29.81 +13:42:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249264_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249264_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:04.95 +11:07:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249269_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249269_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:18.47 +11:43:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249272_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249272_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:52.31 +13:23:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249281_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249281_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:18.02 +14:02:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249293_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249293_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:00.91 +15:10:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249307_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249307_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:22.35 +12:22:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249311_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 249311_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:00.57 +13:46:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129521_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 129521_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227393_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 227393_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:29.63 +13:18:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107020_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 107020_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82670_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 82670_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72111_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 72111_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 234162_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 234162_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:35.28 +15:01:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.40 +13:56:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89457_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
Preparing report for the candidate 89457_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127269_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 127269_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223754_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 223754_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:39.23 +10:34:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223266_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 223266_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:27.57 +12:18:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100402_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001
The candidate 100402_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks