NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Gem-05-Q2b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 05 16.12573    2461176.62573    13.22    07:08:43.31 +15:12:41.7   4512 2475   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.28    07:08:43.31 +15:12:41.3   4518 2478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 16.1260  2461176.6260  13.25  07:08:43.31 +15:12:41.5
201.16914  10.62314 galactic  Gem  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
80 Sappho                   1      2       2  13.4    -0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:08:43.31 +15:12:41.5:  16.11 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:08:43.31 +15:12:41.5:  15.84 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Gem-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Reference image   2026 02 11.14009    2461082.64009    14.04    06:51:17.95 +12:43:16.3   2506 2499   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Discovery image 1   2026 04 05.14643    2461135.64643    13.67    06:51:18.26 +12:43:20.3   7070 3917   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12573    2461176.62573    12.68    06:51:18.10 +12:43:22.1   7099 3925   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Discovery image 3   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    12.76    06:51:18.08 +12:43:23.2   7106 3927   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 16.1260  2461176.6260  12.72  06:51:18.09 +12:43:22.6
201.55515   5.73385 galactic  Gem  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.7 pix   
The object was found in VSX
 3"  ASASSN-V J065117.99+124320.3  
Type: SR
#   Max.           Min./Amp.       JD0           Period
    14.400   V            15.170   V         2457675.00000        172.000000000000                                
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:51:18.09 +12:43:22.6:  14.03 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:51:18.09 +12:43:22.6:  13.62 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.78 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Gem-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Reference image   2026 02 11.14009    2461082.64009    13.75    07:10:50.71 +12:22:14.3   5372 2196   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Discovery image 1   2026 04 05.14643    2461135.64643    13.71    07:10:50.85 +12:22:16.0   4189 4189   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12573    2461176.62573    12.65    07:10:50.52 +12:22:18.8   4219 4195   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Discovery image 3   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    12.65    07:10:50.58 +12:22:17.9   4225 4198   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 16.1260  2461176.6260  12.65  07:10:50.55 +12:22:18.3
203.99710   9.85832 galactic  Gem  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.8 pix   
The object was found in VSX
 3"  ASASSN-V J071050.68+122216.0  
Type: SR
#   Max.           Min./Amp.       JD0           Period
    13.660   V            14.800   V         2458375.51950        126.197049200000                                
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:10:50.55 +12:22:18.3:  13.72 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:10:50.55 +12:22:18.3:  13.66 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.69 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Gem-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Reference image   2026 02 11.14009    2461082.64009    14.16    06:52:25.99 +13:03:04.5   2682 2691   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Discovery image 1   2026 04 05.14643    2461135.64643    14.09    06:52:26.13 +13:03:06.0   6896 3723   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12573    2461176.62573    13.16    06:52:26.11 +13:03:06.6   6926 3731   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Discovery image 3   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.12    06:52:26.16 +13:03:09.0   6932 3733   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 16.1260  2461176.6260  13.14  06:52:26.13 +13:03:07.8
201.38304   6.12813 galactic  Gem  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 6.4 pix   
The object was found in VSX
 2"  ASASSN-V J065226.02+130306.0  
Type: SR
#   Max.           Min./Amp.       JD0           Period
    14.510   V            15.050   V         2458492.00220         72.311923300000                                
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:52:26.13 +13:03:07.8:  14.11 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:52:26.13 +13:03:07.8:  14.00 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.06 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Gem-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Reference image   2026 02 11.14009    2461082.64009    13.67    06:49:23.54 +12:46:58.3   2227 2548   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Discovery image 1   2026 04 05.14643    2461135.64643    13.44    06:49:23.73 +12:47:00.7   7352 3871   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12573    2461176.62573    12.45    06:49:23.74 +12:47:01.3   7381 3880   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits
Discovery image 3   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    12.50    06:49:23.73 +12:47:02.2   7387 3882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 05 16.1260  2461176.6260  12.47  06:49:23.74 +12:47:01.7
201.29142   5.34559 galactic  Gem  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.6 pix   
The object was found in VSX
 2"  NSVS 9854286                  
Type: L
#   Max.           Min./Amp.       JD0           Period
    11.800   R1           12.300   R1                                                                             
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:23.74 +12:47:01.7:  13.64 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:23.74 +12:47:01.7:  13.34 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.49 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Gem-05-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 5

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Gem-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Gem-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Gem-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 725169 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 725169 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.png' -> 'transient_report/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits_preview.png'
Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits

renamed 'Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.png' -> 'transient_report/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits_preview.png'
Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 630.2893 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 835.9389 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1848.2371 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 571.5120 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1772.0818 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 592.9801 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.93236 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.036 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 22.8899993896484 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 23.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-15T22:00:52.8728081' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-16T03:00:52.8728081' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61176.1256119446 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-16T03:01:02.7750395' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61176.1257265625 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 106.666513880681 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9997334191522 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 24.0775 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 271.100555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.43925378896746 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Gem-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '07 06 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20414 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20414 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.8899993896484 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.8899993896484 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 2.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 25.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 893.09 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 23.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 28.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.200576 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/d_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits :) Spent 0.616991 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/d_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 27778.751589 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18343.5, right_median=21629.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 22.8199996948242 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 23.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-05-15T22:01:44.3034432' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-05-16T03:01:44.3034432' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61176.1262072106 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-05-16T03:01:54.2030902' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61176.126321794 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 106.666513894024 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9997334264268 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 23.8969444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 271.219722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.45637925721764 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Gem-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '07 06 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20414 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20414 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.8199996948242 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.8199996948242 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 2.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 25.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 893.09 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 23.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 28.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.200576 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/d_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits :) Spent 0.626470 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-05-13.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/d_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 27778.751589 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=18343.5, right_median=21629.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-11.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits


fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461176.62572769 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits' wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:06:53.386 +14:00:50.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80 Second-epoch image center 07:06:53.386 +14:00:50.84 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0469 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:06:55.862 +14:01:06.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80 Second-epoch image center 07:06:55.862 +14:01:06.75 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0575 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 07:06:53.386 +14:00:50.84 Second-epoch second image center 07:06:55.862 +14:01:06.75 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01094 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.siesyOBItl Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HJaQ4VUpLl Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eS6dy3h4xK Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hurkl3B3uU Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec +8.4660 to +19.3435 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec 8.4660 to 19.3435 deg Loaded 18981 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13233 out of 14919 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 14919 out of 28861 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.900200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.900200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.14
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec +8.4660 to +19.3435 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec 8.4660 to 19.3435 deg Loaded 18981 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13233 out of 14919 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 14919 out of 28861 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=6.3) Read 25465 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3423 to 114.8448 deg, Dec +8.5622 to +19.2817 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3423 to 114.8448 deg, Dec 8.5622 to 19.2817 deg Loaded 18666 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13861 out of 14947 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 14947 out of 25465 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 2.5 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 2.6 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits 2.5 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 2.5 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 14.9 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 13.9 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits 14.0 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.siesyOBItl (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3379, passed=28861 Got 28861 stars (including 25451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28178 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28180 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28159 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1027) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.453 n_q1=224 n_q2=241 n_q3=224 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178 The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.HJaQ4VUpLl (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2216, passed=25458 Got 25458 stars (including 23222 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25458 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25080 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25078 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25079 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67" Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1016) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=924 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.699 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.856 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.781 n_q1=186 n_q2=289 n_q3=176 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224 The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.eS6dy3h4xK (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=474, passed=8373 Got 8373 stars (including 7893 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8373 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 892 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8167 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8168 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8168 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67" Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.662 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.666 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.157 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.639 n_q1=53 n_q2=257 n_q3=298 n_q4=307 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.749 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.hurkl3B3uU (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=648, passed=10034 Got 10034 stars (including 9381 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10034 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9773 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9770 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9770 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59" Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1007) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.613 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.895 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.599 n_q1=112 n_q2=267 n_q3=272 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.461 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits sigma_overall=0.497 worst_q_ratio=1.178 ref2=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits sigma_overall=0.699 worst_q_ratio=1.224 new1=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits sigma_overall=0.662 worst_q_ratio=1.749 new2=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits sigma_overall=0.613 worst_q_ratio=1.461 reference average sigma_overall=0.598 worst_q_ratio=1.201 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034_astrometric_residuals.png (924 matched stars from wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000_astrometric_residuals.png (915 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001_astrometric_residuals.png (915 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34443_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 34443_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    10.31    07:00:39.33 +10:34:53.5   5750 5259   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:00:39.32 +10:34:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34447_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 34447_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    11.37    06:59:27.60 +12:18:56.8   5906 4204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 06:59:27.60 +12:18:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:06:53.386 +14:00:50.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80 Second-epoch image center 07:06:53.386 +14:00:50.84 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0469 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:06:55.862 +14:01:06.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80 Second-epoch image center 07:06:55.862 +14:01:06.75 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0575 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 07:06:53.386 +14:00:50.84 Second-epoch second image center 07:06:55.862 +14:01:06.75 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01094 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FsiCkDdLLR Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LdOXDWmJdl Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6feHx9Z0Z9 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.591gc3r1xI Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec +8.4571 to +19.3472 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec 8.4571 to 19.3472 deg Loaded 19031 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10041 out of 15738 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 15738 out of 208537 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.735000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.735000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec +8.4571 to +19.3472 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec 8.4571 to 19.3472 deg Loaded 19031 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10041 out of 15738 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 15738 out of 208537 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=4.6) Read 174030 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3423 to 114.8515 deg, Dec +8.5562 to +19.2862 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3423 to 114.8515 deg, Dec 8.5562 to 19.2862 deg Loaded 18685 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11872 out of 16121 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 16121 out of 174030 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=4.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 63 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 2.2 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 2.5 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits 2.4 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 2.0 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 15.2 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 14.0 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits 14.2 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.FsiCkDdLLR (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=42, blended=33805, passed=208495 Got 208495 stars (including 174392 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 208495 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204251 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204248 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204249 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54" Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.467 n_q1=233 n_q2=236 n_q3=201 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.187 The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.LdOXDWmJdl (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=45, blended=23358, passed=173985 Got 173985 stars (including 150470 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173985 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171617 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171615 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171612 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61" Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1020) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.650 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.864 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.806 n_q1=202 n_q2=267 n_q3=177 n_q4=281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.330 The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.6feHx9Z0Z9 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=5649, passed=60165 Got 60165 stars (including 54477 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60165 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 885 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58497 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58497 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58497 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64" Excluding outliers - 910 stars left (next iteration limit 1001) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits N_match=910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.741 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.835 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.184 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.740 n_q1=66 n_q2=233 n_q3=309 n_q4=302 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.598 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.591gc3r1xI (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=6756, passed=71333 Got 71333 stars (including 64530 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71333 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 883 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69033 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69032 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69030 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54" Excluding outliers - 905 stars left (next iteration limit 995) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.612 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.934 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.578 n_q1=122 n_q2=235 n_q3=299 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.525 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:05:55.13 +11:38:05.5: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:53:27.47 +10:51:26.3: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:54:27.55 +14:22:40.3: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:02:08.67 +10:45:44.8: 15.06 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:50:24.89 +14:53:24.9: 13.10 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:59:04.48 +13:06:36.8: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:50:24.89 +14:53:24.9: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:05:55.13 +11:38:05.5: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:54:27.55 +14:22:40.3: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:53:27.47 +10:51:26.3: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:02:08.67 +10:45:44.8: 15.22 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:59:04.48 +13:06:36.8: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:50:24.89 +14:53:24.9: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8382 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:55.13 +11:38:05.5: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2954 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:27.55 +14:22:40.3: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3837 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:02:08.67 +10:45:44.8: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.0967 delta=2.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:27.47 +10:51:26.3: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1962 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:04.48 +13:06:36.8: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0578 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:13:57.97 +11:51:49.0: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:55.34 +11:53:56.1: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:05:28.28 +10:33:03.1: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:23:10.17 +10:19:45.7: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:55.34 +11:53:56.1: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:13:57.97 +11:51:49.0: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:55.34 +11:53:56.1: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9051 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:57.97 +11:51:49.0: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0745 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:05:28.28 +10:33:03.1: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:23:10.17 +10:19:45.7: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:28.28 +10:33:03.1: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1762 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:10.17 +10:19:45.7: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4004 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:08:43.31 +15:12:41.5: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:17:01.69 +14:07:50.6: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:17:01.69 +14:07:50.6: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:08:43.31 +15:12:41.5: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:01.69 +14:07:50.6: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2656 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:04:48.33 +13:59:08.1: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:01:32.81 +14:55:18.1: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:51:18.09 +12:43:22.6: 14.03 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:10:50.55 +12:22:18.3: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:52:26.13 +13:03:07.8: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:02:36.74 +14:56:10.0: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:01:32.81 +14:55:18.1: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:51:18.09 +12:43:22.6: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:32.81 +14:55:18.1: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9387 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:51:18.09 +12:43:22.6: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.7242 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:04:48.33 +13:59:08.1: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:48.33 +13:59:08.1: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3830 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:10:50.55 +12:22:18.3: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:10:50.55 +12:22:18.3: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6481 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:52:26.13 +13:03:07.8: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:52:26.13 +13:03:07.8: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1406 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:02:36.74 +14:56:10.0: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:36.74 +14:56:10.0: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0638 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:49:23.74 +12:47:01.7: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:49:23.74 +12:47:01.7: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:49:23.74 +12:47:01.7: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4718 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out249090.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out249220.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72111.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82670.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84373.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out89457.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249064_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249064_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.71    07:10:23.62 +11:08:01.7   4299 4947   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:10:23.61 +11:08:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249068_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249068_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 16.12573    2461176.62573    13.55    07:05:55.10 +11:38:05.9   4952 4631   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.20    07:05:55.16 +11:38:05.1   4958 4634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249070_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249070_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 16.12573    2461176.62573    13.36    06:53:27.50 +10:51:25.5   6812 5066   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.14    06:53:27.45 +10:51:27.1   6818 5068   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249072_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249072_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 16.12573    2461176.62573    13.31    06:54:27.49 +14:22:41.8   6606 2936   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.47    06:54:27.60 +14:22:38.9   6612 2939   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249075_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249075_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.20    07:23:12.27 +12:44:24.6   2397 3985   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:23:12.22 +12:44:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249078_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249078_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 16.12573    2461176.62573    13.10    06:50:24.85 +14:53:24.9   7190 2608   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    12.75    06:50:24.92 +14:53:24.9   7196 2611   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249080_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249080_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.72    07:23:36.73 +10:57:52.8   2331 5063   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:23:36.73 +10:57:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249082_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249082_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.13    07:17:01.37 +13:45:28.4   3310 3367   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:17:01.38 +13:45:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249083_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249083_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 16.12573    2461176.62573    13.20    06:59:04.50 +13:06:36.8   5946 3720   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    12.98    06:59:04.46 +13:06:36.8   5952 3723   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249090_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249090_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.19    07:02:08.64 +10:45:45.4   5527 5153   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:02:08.67 +10:45:44.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.503 3159649251728059008 105.53566827694 +10.76191343011 12.1156 10.3718 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.503#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249104_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249104_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    12.39    07:17:53.66 +11:05:30.4   3185 4982   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:17:53.63 +11:05:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249115_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249115_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    11.92    07:17:14.26 +13:51:38.9   3278 3304   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:17:14.24 +13:51:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249130_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249130_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    12.28    07:00:08.13 +16:04:48.0   5759 1930   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:00:08.06 +16:04:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249133_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249133_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    12.66    07:20:13.21 +15:07:56.8   2840 2536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:20:13.21 +15:07:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249134_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249134_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    12.62    07:19:05.71 +13:23:37.3   3005 3588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:19:05.68 +13:23:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249135_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249135_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    12.50    07:14:29.12 +12:08:48.0   3688 4339   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:14:29.08 +12:08:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249143_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249143_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    12.52    07:03:50.03 +12:33:45.3   5257 4068   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:03:50.03 +12:33:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249154_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249154_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    12.74    07:02:16.53 +15:18:32.3   5456 2403   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:02:16.53 +15:18:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249161_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249161_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    12.82    06:53:14.38 +10:36:52.9   6855 5215   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 06:53:14.37 +10:36:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249162_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249162_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    12.56    07:00:40.71 +16:56:21.7   5670 1411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:00:40.67 +16:56:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249164_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249164_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    12.71    06:51:13.87 +15:03:09.2   7074 2516   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 06:51:13.82 +15:03:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249165_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249165_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    12.96    07:08:31.41 +10:56:43.1   4578 5058   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:08:31.35 +10:56:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249170_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249170_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 16.12573    2461176.62573    12.99    07:13:57.94 +11:51:48.4   3760 4507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.18    07:13:58.01 +11:51:49.5   3766 4510   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249171_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249171_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.15    07:15:06.00 +11:00:47.2   3600 5027   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:15:06.00 +11:00:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249173_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249173_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    12.89    07:05:09.29 +14:14:05.5   5047 3060   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:05:09.35 +14:14:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249177_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249177_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.08    07:04:57.08 +14:13:59.0   5077 3061   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:04:57.08 +14:13:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249182_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249182_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 16.12573    2461176.62573    12.87    06:49:55.27 +11:53:55.8   7320 4419   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    12.95    06:49:55.40 +11:53:56.4   7326 4421   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249184_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249184_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.22    07:07:05.24 +12:20:26.5   4780 4210   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:07:05.28 +12:20:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249186_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249186_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    12.98    07:00:54.09 +12:25:23.8   5691 4144   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:00:53.95 +12:25:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249188_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249188_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 16.12573    2461176.62573    13.10    07:05:28.31 +10:33:02.9   5028 5288   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.28    07:05:28.25 +10:33:03.3   5034 5290   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249194_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249194_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 16.12573    2461176.62573    13.36    07:23:10.11 +10:19:45.8   2389 5447   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.45    07:23:10.23 +10:19:45.6   2396 5450   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249201_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249201_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.14    07:01:28.28 +15:40:21.2   5569 2181   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:01:28.23 +15:40:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249203_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249203_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.33    07:20:59.39 +13:05:48.4   2725 3768   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:20:59.38 +13:05:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249204_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249204_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.60    07:22:07.38 +10:23:25.0   2553 5412   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:22:07.36 +10:23:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249205_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249205_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.62    07:19:32.82 +10:25:34.3   2938 5389   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:19:32.79 +10:25:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249215_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249215_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.46    07:13:25.28 +13:44:09.9   3839 3377   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:13:25.32 +13:44:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249216_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249216_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.50    07:20:07.93 +13:38:42.1   2852 3436   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:20:08.05 +13:38:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249217_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249217_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 05 16.12573    2461176.62573    13.29    07:17:01.70 +14:07:50.7   3302 3138   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.25    07:17:01.68 +14:07:50.5   3308 3141   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249220_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 Preparing report for the candidate 249220_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249227_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249227_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.37    07:03:30.05 +10:54:47.0   5324 5066   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:03:30.02 +10:54:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249230_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249230_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.31    07:07:35.77 +14:21:35.2   4689 2990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:07:35.80 +14:21:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249238_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249238_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.42    07:15:03.81 +11:01:43.5   3606 5018   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:15:03.75 +11:01:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249241_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249241_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.31    07:05:29.67 +13:42:47.0   5002 3376   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:05:29.81 +13:42:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249264_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249264_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.86    07:17:04.93 +11:07:45.9   3305 4959   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:17:04.95 +11:07:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249269_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249269_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.49    07:11:18.50 +11:43:33.0   4160 4590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:11:18.47 +11:43:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249272_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249272_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.67    07:19:52.29 +13:23:00.6   2891 3594   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:19:52.31 +13:23:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249281_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249281_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.77    07:17:18.09 +14:02:41.3   3268 3193   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:17:18.02 +14:02:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249293_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249293_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.91    07:08:00.86 +15:10:05.0   4622 2503   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:08:00.91 +15:10:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249307_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249307_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.90    07:17:22.31 +12:22:08.3   3261 4207   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:17:22.35 +12:22:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 249311_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 249311_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.82    07:17:00.48 +13:46:19.3   3312 3358   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:17:00.57 +13:46:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 129521_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 129521_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12573    2461176.62573    10.89    07:01:32.81 +14:55:17.9   5561 2633   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits Discovery image 3   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    10.99    07:01:32.81 +14:55:18.3   5567 2635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 227393_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 227393_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    11.51    07:03:29.69 +13:18:05.2   5300 3620   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:03:29.63 +13:18:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 107020_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 107020_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12573    2461176.62573    13.29    07:04:48.31 +13:59:07.1   5094 3208   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits Discovery image 3   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.54    07:04:48.35 +13:59:09.0   5100 3210   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 82670_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 Preparing report for the candidate 82670_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 72111_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 Preparing report for the candidate 72111_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 234162_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 234162_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    11.48    07:01:35.30 +15:01:00.6   5560 2578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:01:35.28 +15:01:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 106125_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    12.72    07:04:57.37 +13:56:49.8   5079 3234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:04:57.40 +13:56:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 89457_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 Preparing report for the candidate 89457_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 127269_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 127269_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 05 16.12573    2461176.62573    13.06    07:02:36.71 +14:56:10.4   5405 2627   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-00-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0000.fits Discovery image 3   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    13.07    07:02:36.77 +14:56:09.5   5411 2630   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 223754_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 223754_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    10.37    07:00:39.32 +10:34:53.6   5750 5259   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 07:00:39.23 +10:34:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 223266_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 223266_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    11.40    06:59:27.57 +12:18:56.7   5906 4204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 06:59:27.57 +12:18:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 100402_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 The candidate 100402_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 05 16.12632    2461176.62632    11.69    06:50:23.66 +13:32:20.7   7225 3429   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220222_TTUQ2b1x1_2486841_zCtOTCEg/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits **** FOUND 06:50:23.66 +13:32:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 84373_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 Preparing report for the candidate 84373_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_22-01-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0001 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 07:08:43.31 +15:12:41.5 07:10:50.55 +12:22:18.3 06:51:18.09 +12:43:22.6 06:49:23.74 +12:47:01.7 06:52:26.13 +13:03:07.8 ########### Completed Gem-05-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 07:08:43.31 +15:12:41.5 06:51:18.09 +12:43:22.6 07:10:50.55 +12:22:18.3 06:52:26.13 +13:03:07.8 06:49:23.74 +12:47:01.7 ################################################################################### 07:08:43.31 +15:12:41.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 06:51:18.09 +12:43:22.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) 07:10:50.55 +12:22:18.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) 06:52:26.13 +13:03:07.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) 06:49:23.74 +12:47:01.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 06:49:23.74 +12:47:01.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) 06:51:18.09 +12:43:22.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) 06:52:26.13 +13:03:07.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) 07:10:50.55 +12:22:18.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 06:49:23.74 +12:47:01.7 -- a known variable star 06:51:18.09 +12:43:22.6 -- a known variable star 06:52:26.13 +13:03:07.8 -- a known variable star 07:10:50.55 +12:22:18.3 -- a known variable star Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 4 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 06:49:23.74 +12:47:01.7 06:51:18.09 +12:43:22.6 06:52:26.13 +13:03:07.8 07:10:50.55 +12:22:18.3 07:02:08.67 +10:45:44.8 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461176.62572769 -observatory V36 03:37:27.98 +19:50:05.9 Mercury (-2.3mag) 05:42:57.54 +24:52:45.7 Venus (-3.9mag) 01:43:17.27 +09:51:59.4 Mars (1.2mag) 07:30:30.60 +22:12:44.1 Jupiter (-1.9mag) 00:41:41.69 +02:04:57.8 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:54:37.37 +20:09:00.6 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:14:19.71 +00:06:12.0 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:34:11.01 -22:57:12.3 Pluto (14.5mag) 02:41:03.67 +20:03:59.4 Moon (-8.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 May 15 22:05 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461176.62572769: 07:30:30.17 +22:12:47.5 Io (5.9mag) 07:30:31.02 +22:12:40.8 Europa (6.1mag) 07:30:28.86 +22:12:42.5 Ganymede (5.5mag) 07:30:38.59 +22:12:32.1 Callisto (6.7mag) 07:32:12.62 +21:50:23.2 Himalia (15.5mag) 07:30:32.82 +22:12:39.6 Thebe (16.4mag) 07:32:39.31 +22:15:41.9 Elara (17.4mag) 07:31:22.20 +22:36:52.8 Pasiphae (17.6mag) 07:37:59.55 +22:12:57.2 Carme (18.7mag) 00:41:49.87 +02:05:15.4 Titan (8.7mag) 00:41:41.61 +02:05:13.1 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:41:41.25 +02:03:27.1 Iapetus (11.4mag) 00:41:33.22 +02:04:51.4 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:42:50.42 +02:10:06.7 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 May 15 22:05 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461176.62572769: 17:06:24.96 -30:45:06.6 JWST 17:27:01.13 +41:18:40.7 Chandra 08:01:59.21 -39:49:03.2 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 May 15 22:05 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461176.62572769 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] 13:30:54.66 -28:03:05.8 14.6mag D/1884 O1 (Barnard) 06:20:10.28 +30:52:58.6 15.8mag D/1886 K1 (Brooks) 15:35:32.62 +00:47:09.4 14.8mag D/1895 Q1 (Swift) 05:12:05.41 +24:14:20.2 17.1mag D/1918 W1 (Schorr) 08:17:45.18 +22:49:48.7 17.7mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina) 18:54:34.46 -30:51:57.7 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:31:32.22 -68:30:46.4 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:40:54.37 +31:41:52.4 17.4mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:23:29.85 +13:44:07.2 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:14:48.23 +30:34:59.1 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:05:35.41 +26:42:46.7 16.3mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:15:05.13 +31:44:39.8 16.5mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:39:39.01 +02:32:32.3 17.5mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:42:00.32 +20:42:40.1 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:28:43.65 -11:07:03.9 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 08:59:54.37 -07:44:28.2 17.9mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 22:14:22.15 +64:56:26.9 17.7mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 18:37:51.41 -04:50:03.4 13.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 14:50:02.34 +87:36:06.5 17.9mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:41:53.14 +63:42:50.5 17.5mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:10:12.33 +25:07:42.4 12.7mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:56:18.86 +10:57:50.2 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:22:38.75 +24:04:29.3 14.2mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:54:58.95 -18:19:10.5 16.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:44:08.16 +38:42:54.8 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 12:01:36.05 +53:22:27.6 16.5mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 05:57:43.86 -09:01:01.2 11.2mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:43:06.75 +04:23:58.8 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 01:15:12.30 +41:25:00.4 15.5mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:12:37.08 -14:00:22.2 16.1mag A/2026 E1 19:40:48.49 -08:15:49.2 10.0mag 10P/Tempel 14:24:57.14 -00:57:06.1 16.7mag 24P/Schaumasse 10:59:01.65 -00:53:49.8 15.8mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:45:20.65 -02:38:26.4 17.5mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 02:35:42.57 +22:20:57.4 17.5mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 08:10:59.39 +29:59:17.8 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:04:31.69 -08:12:17.0 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 05:30:11.67 +29:45:34.0 16.3mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 02:14:13.09 +13:46:47.5 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 00:26:29.65 -00:46:04.9 15.1mag 88P/Howell 03:40:49.52 +27:24:02.1 15.1mag 93P/Lovas 05:57:10.51 +33:18:40.0 15.9mag 123P/West-Hartley 09:11:27.30 +24:41:59.7 16.4mag 124P/Mrkos 03:21:09.43 +17:25:51.8 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 03:47:25.16 +17:35:47.1 17.6mag 131P/Mueller 04:08:02.34 +19:30:56.8 11.9mag 141P/Machholz 04:11:37.66 +14:29:28.5 11.8mag 141P-A/Machholz 02:52:52.10 +10:59:43.8 10.5mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:40:36.04 -28:21:44.2 17.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 02:29:07.59 +13:31:38.0 14.9mag 162P/SidingSpring 17:09:30.09 -10:19:49.1 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR 06:42:00.74 +35:54:46.6 17.2mag 240P/NEAT 07:57:57.66 -02:35:35.1 18.0mag 242P/Spahr 23:32:48.70 -11:32:19.9 17.0mag 260P/McNaught 03:05:05.23 +27:43:35.1 17.7mag 295P/LINEAR 15:27:20.42 +08:18:27.5 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 07:50:14.59 +21:12:10.9 17.8mag 450P/LONEOS 06:22:28.97 +43:14:03.3 17.7mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K May 15 22:05 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.80 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.34 13.72 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 2026-05-13.41 16.8 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 2026-05-13.41 16.8 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.96 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-18.8 16.32 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K May 15 22:05 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K May 15 22:05 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 14:36:21.491 +29:55:10.64 AT 2026man 2026-05-10.41 19.7749 12:04:17.976 -00:20:39.59 AT 2026mam 2026-04-10.36 18.5394 14:46:55.250 -18:19:26.38 AT 2026mal 2026-04-17.35 18.7819 23:49:29.770 +44:49:32.29 AT 2026mak 2026-04-20.50 18.6921 11:28:07.319 +09:29:46.44 AT 2026maj 2026-04-25.29 19.155 00:41:43.621 +40:34:44.59 AT 2026mai 2026-05-09.49 19.1405 18:57:15.805 -16:48:32.51 AT 2026mah 2026-05-08.39 19.4824 10:01:41.879 +74:03:48.71 AT 2026mag 2026-05-07.20 20.3827 23:23:43.954 +04:50:08.99 AT 2026maf 2026-05-09.48 18.935 00:03:06.946 +27:39:26.49 AT 2026mae 2026-05-09.49 19.5011 11:19:18.104 +10:50:11.49 AT 2026mad 2026-05-09.25 20.4219 13:49:39.550 -06:05:33.46 AT 2026mac 2026-05-09.31 21.05 22:34:01.697 -02:38:29.42 AT 2026mab 2026-04-29.49 18.9009 16:50:45.559 +22:21:18.64 AT 2026maa 2026-05-07.33 19.4442 18:04:04.420 +24:34:06.67 AT 2026lzz 2026-05-01.81 20.84 12:36:23.380 +43:35:54.40 AT 2026lzy 2026-04-24.82 20.04 15:19:27.800 +28:06:32.24 AT 2026lzx 2026-04-19.90 20.41 13:18:25.550 +26:57:36.76 AT 2026lzw 2026-04-15.87 20.74 13:03:51.840 +23:18:47.04 AT 2026lzv 2026-04-11.88 19.88 15:03:29.710 +53:31:32.85 AT 2026lzu 2026-04-05.77 20.7 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K May 15 22:05 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 92 C