This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 15.3282 2461175.8282 12.24 15:56:06.45 -33:28:05.1
341.51613 15.23061 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J155606-3328.0
Type: MISC|SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.710 V Y 1.630 V 2452434.20000 156.814514000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:56:06.45 -33:28:05.1: 13.24 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:56:06.45 -33:28:05.1: 13.08 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J155606-3328.0,2461175.8282,12.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J155606-3328.0 20260515.3282 12.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 15.3282 2461175.8282 12.57 15:55:54.58 -32:57:53.5
341.83165 15.63365 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J155554-3257.9
Type: MISC|SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.700 V Y 0.780 V 2452110.70000 103.734596000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:55:54.58 -32:57:53.5: 13.79 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:55:54.58 -32:57:53.5: 13.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J155554-3257.9,2461175.8282,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J155554-3257.9 20260515.3282 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 15.3282 2461175.8282 12.33 15:47:34.18 -31:50:55.3
341.21371 17.63205 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 9.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ASASSN-V J154734.45-315053.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.020 V 13.390 V 2456796.90000 95.800000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:47:34.18 -31:50:55.3: 13.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:47:34.18 -31:50:55.3: 13.19 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J154734.45-315053.1,2461175.8282,12.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J154734.45-315053.1 20260515.3282 12.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.81684877 16.04.2026 07:36:05.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
First image: 2461146.81684877 16.04.2026 07:36:05.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Last image: 2461175.82846615 15.05.2026 07:52:49.475 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4552
Objects passed selection criteria: 4551
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3748
Average stars matched: 3467.75 (92.5227 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111168 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 15 03:02:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.81684877 16.04.2026 07:36:05.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
First image: 2461146.81684877 16.04.2026 07:36:05.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Last image: 2461175.82846615 15.05.2026 07:52:49.475 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 39
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.10
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 44809
Objects passed selection criteria: 44763
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 38025.2
Average stars matched: 35143.5 (92.4215 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 149928 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 15 03:05:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461175.82791120
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits'
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:08.440 -34:00:49.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:08.440 -34:00:49.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0206 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.1'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:07.183 -34:00:01.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:07.183 -34:00:01.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0073 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:39:08.440 -34:00:49.73
Second-epoch second image center 15:39:07.183 -34:00:01.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01414 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2POyqizvRe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8VEy9JYG9Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XXYTAM50qU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pNFoX2Ux85
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Loaded 10950 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5601 out of 5758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5758 out of 7114 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.629800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.629800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Loaded 10950 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5601 out of 5758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5758 out of 7114 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 5034 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.8758 to 244.7163 deg, Dec -39.2722 to -28.3893 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.8758 to 244.7163 deg, Dec -39.2722 to -28.3893 deg
Loaded 10334 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4169 out of 4262 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4262 out of 5034 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.4 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.4 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
2.3 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
13.5 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.9 (SNR ) 10.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.2POyqizvRe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=539, passed=7114
Got 7114 stars (including 6567 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.447 n_q1=257 n_q2=217 n_q3=212 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.080
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8VEy9JYG9Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=346, passed=5034
Got 5034 stars (including 4686 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5034 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.726 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.639 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.589 n_q1=240 n_q2=223 n_q3=198 n_q4=296 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.173
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XXYTAM50qU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=168, passed=3079
Got 3079 stars (including 2910 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3079 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2979 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2980 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2980 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.681 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.571 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.801 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.856 n_q1=277 n_q2=179 n_q3=226 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pNFoX2Ux85 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=218, passed=3876
Got 3876 stars (including 3657 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3876 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.845 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.797 n_q1=290 n_q2=204 n_q3=226 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.411
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits sigma_overall=0.440 worst_q_ratio=1.080
ref2=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits sigma_overall=0.619 worst_q_ratio=1.173
new1=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits sigma_overall=0.681 worst_q_ratio=1.257
new2=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits sigma_overall=0.599 worst_q_ratio=1.411
reference average sigma_overall=0.5295 worst_q_ratio=1.1265
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081_astrometric_residuals.png (957 matched stars from wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:40:29.36 -34:15:12.7: 11.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:43:08.59 -34:34:53.4: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:40:29.36 -34:15:12.7: 11.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:40:29.36 -34:15:12.7: ref_mag=11.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8869 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:43:08.59 -34:34:53.4: 11.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:08.59 -34:34:53.4: ref_mag=11.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8967 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20891_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 20891_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20902_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 20902_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02914_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 02914_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:54:30.72 -35:24:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:08.440 -34:00:49.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:08.440 -34:00:49.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0206 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:07.183 -34:00:01.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:07.183 -34:00:01.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0073 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:39:08.440 -34:00:49.73
Second-epoch second image center 15:39:07.183 -34:00:01.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01414 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DeFaF7Key6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ov2mALWFYi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Kjsm6hFTo0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A8sIt3wGOl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 70289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Loaded 11081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7807 out of 8626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8626 out of 70289 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.435700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.435700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.10
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 70289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Loaded 11081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7807 out of 8626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8626 out of 70289 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 50301 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.8758 to 244.8113 deg, Dec -39.2866 to -28.3393 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.8758 to 244.8113 deg, Dec -39.2866 to -28.3393 deg
Loaded 10431 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8115 out of 8700 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8700 out of 50301 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 33 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.2 pix Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
2.4 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
2.2 pix fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
13.8 mag. Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DeFaF7Key6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3491, passed=70279
Got 70279 stars (including 66700 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.478 n_q1=260 n_q2=227 n_q3=215 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ov2mALWFYi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2052, passed=50294
Got 50294 stars (including 48166 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50294 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49504 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49504 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.573 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.653 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.617 n_q1=242 n_q2=233 n_q3=180 n_q4=305 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.099
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Kjsm6hFTo0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1036, passed=29746
Got 29746 stars (including 28677 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29746 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.655 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.822 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.849 n_q1=283 n_q2=171 n_q3=240 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.296
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.A8sIt3wGOl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1490, passed=37831
Got 37831 stars (including 36300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37831 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.584 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.837 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.844 n_q1=309 n_q2=195 n_q3=239 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.445
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_025802_TTUQ2b1x1_2537668_n3essbxS/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:49:33.24 -31:04:01.8: 11.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:35:29.18 -37:10:19.9: 12.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:58:21.06 -34:19:51.5: 14.03 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:58:30.72 -32:53:39.1: 13.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:50:57.00 -34:14:56.4: 14.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:52:05.22 -34:43:58.7: 14.37 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:56:51.94 -33:27:21.5: 14.23 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:52:16.45 -34:20:31.9: 14.20 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:49:33.24 -31:04:01.8: 11.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:35:29.18 -37:10:19.9: 12.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:33.24 -31:04:01.8: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9017 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:29.18 -37:10:19.9: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4794 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:50:18.58 -34:30:12.7: 14.34 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:48:20.17 -34:12:47.4: 14.10 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:58:21.06 -34:19:51.5: 14.10 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:21.06 -34:19:51.5: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.2984 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:56:51.94 -33:27:21.5: 13.81 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:51.94 -33:27:21.5: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.3193 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:58:30.72 -32:53:39.1: 13.80 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:52:05.22 -34:43:58.7: 14.28 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:50:57.00 -34:14:56.4: 13.92 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:52:16.45 -34:20:31.9: 14.15 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:52:05.22 -34:43:58.7: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.4314 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:30.72 -32:53:39.1: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3033 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:57.00 -34:14:56.4: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.3379 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:16.45 -34:20:31.9: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.2938 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:50:18.58 -34:30:12.7: 14.03 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:18.58 -34:30:12.7: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.4358 delta=0.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:48:20.17 -34:12:47.4: 14.39 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:20.17 -34:12:47.4: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.3177 delta=0.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:50:49.48 -35:17:41.0: 14.32 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:53:36.58 -33:41:43.0: 14.56 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:41:46.53 -34:24:49.9: 14.22 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:53:59.04 -33:34:12.5: 14.59 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:50:49.48 -35:17:41.0: 14.15 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:53:36.58 -33:41:43.0: 14.43 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:49.48 -35:17:41.0: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.4755 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:53:36.58 -33:41:43.0: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.5042 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:41:46.53 -34:24:49.9: 14.11 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:46.53 -34:24:49.9: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.4523 delta=0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:21:08.82 -33:31:33.4: 13.77 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:53:59.04 -33:34:12.5: 14.09 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:59.04 -33:34:12.5: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=13.4957 delta=0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:56:06.45 -33:28:05.1: 13.24 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:01:01.74 -35:22:10.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:27:39.74 -37:16:03.7: 13.65 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:55:54.58 -32:57:53.5: 13.79 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:21:08.82 -33:31:33.4: 14.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:56:06.45 -33:28:05.1: 13.08 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:21:08.82 -33:31:33.4: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=12.8741 delta=0.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:56:06.45 -33:28:05.1: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.2465 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:47:34.18 -31:50:55.3: 13.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 16:01:01.74 -35:22:10.9: 13.30 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:01:01.74 -35:22:10.9: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=12.3814 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:27:39.74 -37:16:03.7: 14.20 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:27:39.74 -37:16:03.7: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.6026 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:55:54.58 -32:57:53.5: 13.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:55:54.58 -32:57:53.5: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.5645 delta=1.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-47-45_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0081.fits at 15:47:34.18 -31:50:55.3: 13.19 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:47:34.18 -31:50:55.3: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.2792 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out12709.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out81804.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out89156.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out89225.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out39443.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out49087.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out65053.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82481_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 82481_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83398_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 83398_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:42:41.80 -32:11:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85322_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 85322_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85710_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 85710_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:38:51.23 -35:44:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85928_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 85928_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:00.38 -35:11:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86718_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 86718_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:29.75 -34:02:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86901_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 86901_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:41.32 -33:16:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87372_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 87372_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:57:19.14 -34:25:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88204_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 88204_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:45:19.84 -36:27:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88637_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 88637_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:59.74 -30:58:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88652_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 88652_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:01.28 -32:53:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88915_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 88915_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88951_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 88951_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89103_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 89103_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:45:12.16 -33:28:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89107_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 89107_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89148_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 89148_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89156_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 89156_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:52:05.22 -34:43:58.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.256 6011670195282061056 238.02139963249 -34.73316918157 14.0176 13.3099 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.256#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89173_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 89173_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89209_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 89209_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89214_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 89214_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89215_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 89215_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89225_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 89225_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:36.58 -33:41:43.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.294 6012159374878102528 238.40237209345 -33.69520511910 13.9500 13.3380 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.294#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89239_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 89239_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89241_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 89241_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26686_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 26686_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:54:30.72 -35:24:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21298_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 21298_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:28.77 -36:17:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12935_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 12935_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:21:04.02 -37:04:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39443_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
Preparing report for the candidate 39443_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35701_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 35701_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81804_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 81804_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:01:01.74 -35:22:10.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.446 6011058454504194688 240.25734014780 -35.36959479827 12.2754 11.4699 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.446#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12709_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 12709_fd_Lup-01-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-52-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks