This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 15.2989 2461175.7989 11.88 16:05:23.26 -13:36:37.6
358.27329 27.77520 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.346 Hermentaria 2 -1 2 11.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:05:23.26 -13:36:37.6: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:05:23.26 -13:36:37.6: 15.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461175.7989,11.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260515.2989 11.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 15.2989 2461175.7989 12.48 15:47:27.02 -08:50:40.6
359.05124 34.22528 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.776 Berbericia 1 -1 2 12.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:47:27.02 -08:50:40.6: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:47:27.02 -08:50:40.6: 15.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461175.7989,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260515.2989 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 15.2989 2461175.7989 12.79 16:37:00.45 -05:21:41.4
10.96617 26.60572 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.97 Klotho 2 -1 2 12.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:37:00.45 -05:21:41.4: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:37:00.45 -05:21:41.4: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461175.7989,12.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260515.2989 12.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 15.2989 2461175.7989 12.87 16:07:17.50 -08:18:13.2
3.28781 30.81947 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.559 Nanon 2 -1 2 13.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:07:17.50 -08:18:13.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:07:17.50 -08:18:13.2: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461175.7989,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260515.2989 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 15.2989 2461175.7989 13.04 15:56:39.64 -13:34:18.8
356.69762 29.38278 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.563 Suleika 5 -4 6 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:56:39.64 -13:34:18.8: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:56:39.64 -13:34:18.8: 14.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461175.7989,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260515.2989 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 15.2989 2461175.7989 14.27 16:41:11.85 -05:57:24.6
11.06397 25.40852 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1723 Klemola 2 -3 4 14.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:41:11.85 -05:57:24.6: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:41:11.85 -05:57:24.6: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461175.7989,14.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260515.2989 14.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 15.2989 2461175.7989 13.01 15:59:53.28 -14:23:31.6
356.60711 28.25165 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 15:59:53.28 -14:23:31.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:59:53.28 -14:23:31.6: 14.11 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:59:53.28 -14:23:31.6: 14.06 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461175.7989,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260515.2989 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 15.2989 2461175.7989 12.79 15:48:55.88 -13:01:22.7
355.68200 31.13440 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.8" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J237.2268-13.0260 | 15:48:55.88 -13:01:22.7 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:48:55.88 -13:01:22.7: 14.27 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:48:55.88 -13:01:22.7: 13.79 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J237.2268-13.0260,2461175.7989,12.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J237.2268-13.0260 20260515.2989 12.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461098.97005181 27.02.2026 11:16:42.476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
First image: 2461098.97005181 27.02.2026 11:16:42.476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Last image: 2461175.79920459 15.05.2026 07:10:41.277 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 69
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.84
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7189
Objects passed selection criteria: 7186
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6675.25
Average stars matched: 6530.25 (97.8278 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113100 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 15 05:07:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461098.97005181 27.02.2026 11:16:42.476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
First image: 2461098.97005181 27.02.2026 11:16:42.476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Last image: 2461175.79920459 15.05.2026 07:10:41.277 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 103
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 45465
Objects passed selection criteria: 45387
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 44283.2
Average stars matched: 43709.8 (98.7049 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 150516 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 15 05:09:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461175.79865972
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits'
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:24.121 -09:59:38.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66
Second-epoch image center 16:17:24.121 -09:59:38.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0621 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:22.868 -09:59:07.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66
Second-epoch image center 16:17:22.868 -09:59:07.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0584 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:24.121 -09:59:38.23
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:22.868 -09:59:07.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01008 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mf9sHkPwAS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mSq9VLK4lC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uQgge4eyYe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oPjrOcpCGb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1744 to 252.3750 deg, Dec -15.2624 to -4.6754 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1744 to 252.3750 deg, Dec -15.2624 to -4.6754 deg
Loaded 4809 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3998 out of 4171 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4171 out of 7722 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.912750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.912750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.84
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.07
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.07
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1744 to 252.3750 deg, Dec -15.2624 to -4.6754 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1744 to 252.3750 deg, Dec -15.2624 to -4.6754 deg
Loaded 4809 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3998 out of 4171 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4171 out of 7722 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits (aperture=5.8)
Read 5066 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.2082 to 252.3187 deg, Dec -15.2481 to -4.6756 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.2082 to 252.3187 deg, Dec -15.2481 to -4.6756 deg
Loaded 4791 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3538 out of 3621 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3621 out of 5066 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 67 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
2.4 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
3.8 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
3.8 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
14.5 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.mf9sHkPwAS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=451, passed=7719
Got 7719 stars (including 7254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7719 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=262 n_q2=215 n_q3=262 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mSq9VLK4lC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=289, passed=5066
Got 5066 stars (including 4773 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5066 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.567 n_q1=279 n_q2=221 n_q3=254 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.174
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uQgge4eyYe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=277, passed=7039
Got 7039 stars (including 6760 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7039 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=253 n_q2=214 n_q3=275 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.327
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oPjrOcpCGb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=259, passed=7026
Got 7026 stars (including 6761 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7026 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=254 n_q2=215 n_q3=276 n_q4=218 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits sigma_overall=0.301 worst_q_ratio=1.096
ref2=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits sigma_overall=0.483 worst_q_ratio=1.174
new1=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.327
new2=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.304
reference average sigma_overall=0.392 worst_q_ratio=1.135
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041_astrometric_residuals.png (964 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:16:21.66 -12:11:58.7: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:31:20.40 -05:16:00.2: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:16:58.94 -14:57:21.9: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:05:23.26 -13:36:37.6: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:16:58.94 -14:57:21.9: 12.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:31:20.40 -05:16:00.2: 12.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:58.94 -14:57:21.9: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8455 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:20.40 -05:16:00.2: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7103 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:21:19.68 -11:35:03.5: 11.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:48:00.85 -08:21:40.3: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:10:52.02 -11:13:46.1: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:16:21.66 -12:11:58.7: 11.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:21.66 -12:11:58.7: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9240 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:05:12.99 -08:37:14.2: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:21:19.68 -11:35:03.5: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:48:00.85 -08:21:40.3: 11.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:19.68 -11:35:03.5: ref_mag=11.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8527 delta=-0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:00.85 -08:21:40.3: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9008 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:13:43.95 -10:53:07.2: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:05:23.26 -13:36:37.6: 15.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:10:52.02 -11:13:46.1: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:52.02 -11:13:46.1: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9569 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:18:38.81 -05:46:01.8: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:05:12.99 -08:37:14.2: 12.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:12.99 -08:37:14.2: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0144 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:13:43.95 -10:53:07.2: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:43.95 -10:53:07.2: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9385 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:17:31.19 -09:06:24.8: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:18:38.81 -05:46:01.8: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:38.81 -05:46:01.8: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9598 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:16:43.55 -11:53:35.3: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:23:41.28 -10:10:27.4: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:17:31.19 -09:06:24.8: 12.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:31.19 -09:06:24.8: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0107 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:05:05.27 -08:10:50.3: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:16:43.55 -11:53:35.3: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:43.55 -11:53:35.3: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9832 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:23:41.28 -10:10:27.4: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:23:41.28 -10:10:27.4: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0015 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:21:49.16 -08:12:59.6: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:43:58.41 -15:10:35.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:50:41.46 -08:06:15.1: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:05:05.27 -08:10:50.3: 12.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:57:50.58 -08:52:48.8: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:12:38.50 -05:30:48.8: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:05.27 -08:10:50.3: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0301 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:43:58.41 -15:10:35.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:58.41 -15:10:35.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:21:49.16 -08:12:59.6: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:49.16 -08:12:59.6: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0192 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:57:50.58 -08:52:48.8: 12.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:12:38.50 -05:30:48.8: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:50.58 -08:52:48.8: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0774 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:38.50 -05:30:48.8: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0323 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:13:34.77 -09:30:35.7: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:50:41.46 -08:06:15.1: 12.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:41.46 -08:06:15.1: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0673 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:03:33.59 -10:11:37.8: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:07:23.77 -07:24:04.6: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:13:34.77 -09:30:35.7: 12.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:34.77 -09:30:35.7: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0651 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:08:49.75 -07:04:19.2: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:07:23.77 -07:24:04.6: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:03:33.59 -10:11:37.8: 12.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:23.77 -07:24:04.6: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0611 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:33.59 -10:11:37.8: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0410 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:11:39.63 -09:27:02.9: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:16:00.18 -07:33:25.3: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:00:39.60 -08:36:46.4: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:30:24.57 -06:03:24.2: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:14:08.06 -09:45:34.1: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:08:49.75 -07:04:19.2: 12.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:49.75 -07:04:19.2: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0743 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:16:00.18 -07:33:25.3: 12.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:00.18 -07:33:25.3: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0781 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:00:39.60 -08:36:46.4: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:06:22.97 -10:31:29.0: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:39.60 -08:36:46.4: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1089 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:11:39.63 -09:27:02.9: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:39.63 -09:27:02.9: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0661 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:30:24.57 -06:03:24.2: 12.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:24.57 -06:03:24.2: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0725 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:14:08.06 -09:45:34.1: 12.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:08.06 -09:45:34.1: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0929 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:06:17.35 -10:24:59.8: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:14:39.15 -07:29:29.0: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:06:22.97 -10:31:29.0: 12.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:22.97 -10:31:29.0: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1077 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:06:17.35 -10:24:59.8: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:08:25.64 -07:14:56.7: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:14:39.15 -07:29:29.0: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:17.35 -10:24:59.8: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0866 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:22:20.70 -08:21:40.8: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:39.15 -07:29:29.0: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1481 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:11:43.02 -06:45:48.2: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:20:09.45 -08:31:56.6: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:05:39.98 -08:44:21.5: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:08:25.64 -07:14:56.7: 12.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:19:33.54 -06:45:21.3: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:22:20.70 -08:21:40.8: 12.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:25.64 -07:14:56.7: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1292 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:20.70 -08:21:40.8: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1244 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:11:43.02 -06:45:48.2: 12.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:43.02 -06:45:48.2: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1510 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:05:25.05 -08:55:49.5: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:20:09.45 -08:31:56.6: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:09.45 -08:31:56.6: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1037 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:05:39.98 -08:44:21.5: 12.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:40:55.95 -14:37:45.5: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:39.98 -08:44:21.5: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1360 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:19:33.54 -06:45:21.3: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:12:28.17 -05:52:01.2: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:33.54 -06:45:21.3: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1395 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:05:25.05 -08:55:49.5: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:40:55.95 -14:37:45.5: 12.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:25.05 -08:55:49.5: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1404 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:55.95 -14:37:45.5: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1686 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:12:28.17 -05:52:01.2: 12.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:28.17 -05:52:01.2: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1429 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:31:40.09 -08:00:39.7: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:06:48.58 -06:18:38.8: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:52:06.97 -07:50:30.0: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:31:40.09 -08:00:39.7: 12.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:40.09 -08:00:39.7: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1346 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:06:48.58 -06:18:38.8: 12.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:48.58 -06:18:38.8: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1149 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:09:09.74 -08:53:57.1: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:01:20.62 -08:57:10.6: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:52:06.97 -07:50:30.0: 12.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:18:01.18 -05:06:12.5: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:06.97 -07:50:30.0: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1482 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:54:36.04 -07:19:38.8: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:09:09.74 -08:53:57.1: 12.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:09.74 -08:53:57.1: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1519 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:02:15.22 -08:36:58.4: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:01:20.62 -08:57:10.6: 12.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:18:01.18 -05:06:12.5: 12.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:20.62 -08:57:10.6: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1520 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:01.18 -05:06:12.5: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1317 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:54:36.04 -07:19:38.8: 12.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:36.04 -07:19:38.8: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1888 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:02:15.22 -08:36:58.4: 12.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:15.22 -08:36:58.4: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1560 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20147.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20020_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20020_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:47.42 -06:31:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20050_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20050_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:21:24.41 -07:42:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20124_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20124_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:44.27 -13:06:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20137_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20137_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20138_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20138_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:19.17 -12:47:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20145_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20145_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20146_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20146_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20147_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
Preparing report for the candidate 20147_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20148_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20148_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20155_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20155_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20163_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20163_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20164_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20164_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20166_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20166_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20175_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20175_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20177_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20177_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:27.39 -11:46:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20178_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20178_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20179_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20179_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20181_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20181_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:50.93 -06:52:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20182_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20182_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20185_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20185_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:47.87 -06:41:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20188_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20188_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20189_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20189_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20191_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20191_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20192_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20192_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20193_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20193_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20194_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20194_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20197_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20197_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20198_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20198_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20199_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20199_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20200_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20200_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20201_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20201_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20203_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20203_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20206_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20206_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20207_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20207_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20208_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20208_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20209_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20209_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20212_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20212_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20213_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20213_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20214_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20214_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:40.31 -08:07:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20218_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20218_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20219_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20219_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:26.77 -05:33:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20221_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20221_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20222_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20222_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:11.55 -05:55:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20224_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20224_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:54:29.37 -06:19:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20226_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20226_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20227_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20227_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20228_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20228_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20229_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20229_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:35.57 -05:51:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20232_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20232_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20234_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20234_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20235_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20235_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20237_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20237_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20238_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20238_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20240_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20240_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20241_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20241_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:51.70 -06:40:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20244_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20244_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:09.40 -06:20:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20246_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20246_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20248_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20248_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:39.37 -05:59:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20249_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20249_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:31.87 -10:26:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20250_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20250_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20253_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20253_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20254_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20254_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20255_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20255_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:37.31 -08:26:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20256_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20256_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20257_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 20257_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03492_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 03492_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:20.81 -10:30:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06325_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 06325_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:41.26 -06:40:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:05:23.26 -13:36:37.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:24.121 -09:59:38.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66
Second-epoch image center 16:17:24.121 -09:59:38.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0621 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:22.868 -09:59:07.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:09.052 -09:59:57.66
Second-epoch image center 16:17:22.868 -09:59:07.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0584 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:24.121 -09:59:38.23
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:22.868 -09:59:07.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01008 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XXmgF1q2Bb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WxNNOBpC0s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wwKLvE9oX9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8mFuBrOecp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62439 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1591 to 252.4002 deg, Dec -15.2898 to -4.6725 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1591 to 252.4002 deg, Dec -15.2898 to -4.6725 deg
Loaded 4831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3832 out of 4290 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4290 out of 62439 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.794400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.794400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62439 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1591 to 252.4002 deg, Dec -15.2898 to -4.6725 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1591 to 252.4002 deg, Dec -15.2898 to -4.6725 deg
Loaded 4831 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3832 out of 4290 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4290 out of 62439 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 40555 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.1835 to 252.3628 deg, Dec -15.2669 to -4.6542 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.1835 to 252.3628 deg, Dec -15.2669 to -4.6542 deg
Loaded 4815 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3958 out of 4238 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4238 out of 40555 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 80 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
2.1 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
3.5 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
3.5 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
14.7 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.XXmgF1q2Bb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2730, passed=62428
Got 62428 stars (including 59597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62428 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=269 n_q2=218 n_q3=263 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WxNNOBpC0s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1580, passed=40542
Got 40542 stars (including 38911 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40542 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.552 n_q1=281 n_q2=231 n_q3=232 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wwKLvE9oX9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1944, passed=37915
Got 37915 stars (including 35933 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37915 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37151 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37150 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=242 n_q2=204 n_q3=283 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.362
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8mFuBrOecp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1864, passed=37616
Got 37616 stars (including 35716 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37616 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.351 n_q1=242 n_q2=205 n_q3=282 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-09-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0041.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_024907_TTUQ1b1x1_1089092_PPpTglDo/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:20:48.13 -14:59:56.4: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:59:57.14 -13:43:32.4: 13.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:19:00.49 -15:00:04.5: 14.14 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:46:02.04 -08:47:17.9: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:45:45.57 -05:55:41.2: 13.75 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:47:27.46 -09:26:27.2: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:57:40.00 -14:00:10.1: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:51:38.66 -13:31:11.1: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:59:57.14 -13:43:32.4: 13.81 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:19:00.49 -15:00:04.5: 14.03 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:20:48.13 -14:59:56.4: 13.61 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:57.14 -13:43:32.4: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7530 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:00.49 -15:00:04.5: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4138 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:46:02.04 -08:47:17.9: 13.80 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:48.13 -14:59:56.4: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5745 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:45:45.57 -05:55:41.2: 13.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:51:38.66 -13:31:11.1: 13.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:02.04 -08:47:17.9: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8761 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:45.57 -05:55:41.2: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9367 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:38.66 -13:31:11.1: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7097 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:47:27.46 -09:26:27.2: 13.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:57:40.00 -14:00:10.1: 13.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:27.46 -09:26:27.2: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1626 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:40.00 -14:00:10.1: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5718 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:48:56.79 -13:36:55.6: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:47:27.02 -08:50:40.6: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:07:17.50 -08:18:13.2: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:37:00.45 -05:21:41.4: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:56:39.64 -13:34:18.8: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:48:56.79 -13:36:55.6: 12.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:56.79 -13:36:55.6: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6528 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:45:31.62 -10:55:02.1: 13.80 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:47:27.02 -08:50:40.6: 15.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:37:00.45 -05:21:41.4: 15.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:07:17.50 -08:18:13.2: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:56:39.64 -13:34:18.8: 14.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:46:14.18 -06:10:46.5: 14.80 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:45:25.64 -06:10:10.2: 14.52 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:44:34.47 -06:39:59.7: 14.51 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:45:31.62 -10:55:02.1: 13.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:31.62 -10:55:02.1: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.5595 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:46:14.18 -06:10:46.5: 14.27 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:45:25.64 -06:10:10.2: 14.24 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:14.18 -06:10:46.5: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1578 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:25.64 -06:10:10.2: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0421 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:41:11.85 -05:57:24.6: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:44:34.47 -06:39:59.7: 14.26 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:34.47 -06:39:59.7: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2775 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:43:44.15 -05:22:02.7: 14.40 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:41:11.85 -05:57:24.6: 15.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:42:18.92 -05:34:49.6: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:43:44.15 -05:22:02.7: 14.46 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:47:22.32 -07:53:01.1: 14.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:47:58.02 -06:37:45.4: 14.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:44.15 -05:22:02.7: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1684 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:43:45.32 -05:17:49.3: 14.70 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:42:18.92 -05:34:49.6: 14.78 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:18.92 -05:34:49.6: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.3644 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:47:22.32 -07:53:01.1: 14.96 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:47:58.02 -06:37:45.4: 14.63 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:22.32 -07:53:01.1: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4058 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:58.02 -06:37:45.4: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2874 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:43:45.32 -05:17:49.3: 14.90 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:45.32 -05:17:49.3: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4245 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:43:22.28 -09:21:12.4: 14.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:25:27.25 -11:52:34.0: 15.24 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:35:02.61 -05:13:14.4: 14.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:33:17.51 -06:35:51.6: 14.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:43:22.28 -09:21:12.4: 14.67 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:22.28 -09:21:12.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4328 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:46:47.85 -06:34:24.2: 14.85 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:25:27.25 -11:52:34.0: 15.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:25:27.25 -11:52:34.0: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.2057 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:33:17.51 -06:35:51.6: 14.32 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:17.51 -06:35:51.6: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3991 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:35:02.61 -05:13:14.4: 14.74 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:02.61 -05:13:14.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5306 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:46:47.85 -06:34:24.2: 14.34 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:47.85 -06:34:24.2: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5102 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:37:32.75 -06:00:42.9: 14.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:41:38.60 -06:23:44.8: 14.80 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:38:12.56 -07:47:22.7: 14.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:37:32.75 -06:00:42.9: 14.46 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:32.75 -06:00:42.9: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6090 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:41:38.60 -06:23:44.8: 14.37 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:38.60 -06:23:44.8: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5850 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:38:12.56 -07:47:22.7: 14.57 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:12.56 -07:47:22.7: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4108 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:46:03.33 -05:41:36.4: 14.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:36:41.02 -05:19:56.0: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:46:03.33 -05:41:36.4: 14.55 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:03.33 -05:41:36.4: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2989 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:46:45.15 -05:35:38.2: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:39:56.68 -05:32:07.3: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:38:12.60 -05:53:39.6: 14.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:36:41.02 -05:19:56.0: 14.44 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:41.02 -05:19:56.0: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6181 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:39:56.68 -05:32:07.3: 14.93 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:46:45.15 -05:35:38.2: 14.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:56.68 -05:32:07.3: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5739 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:45.15 -05:35:38.2: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4285 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:38:12.60 -05:53:39.6: 14.58 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:12.60 -05:53:39.6: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7106 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:40:30.89 -07:50:56.7: 14.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:33:52.75 -06:51:27.1: 14.75 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:38:04.34 -06:19:19.9: 14.98 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:33:52.75 -06:51:27.1: 14.52 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:52.75 -06:51:27.1: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6363 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:40:30.89 -07:50:56.7: 14.54 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:30.89 -07:50:56.7: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6024 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:33:53.00 -06:41:11.9: 14.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:38:04.34 -06:19:19.9: 14.57 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:04.34 -06:19:19.9: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4094 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:33:53.00 -06:41:11.9: 15.11 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:53.00 -06:41:11.9: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5484 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:18:42.98 -05:12:02.6: 14.66 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:18:42.98 -05:12:02.6: 14.63 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:42.98 -05:12:02.6: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6695 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:33:34.33 -06:27:54.8: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:16:44.14 -08:04:56.0: 14.89 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:37:05.83 -08:40:07.6: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:33:34.33 -06:27:54.8: 14.85 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:16:44.14 -08:04:56.0: 14.95 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:34.33 -06:27:54.8: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7449 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:44.14 -08:04:56.0: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5828 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:25:15.91 -06:51:51.6: 15.13 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:37:05.83 -08:40:07.6: 14.62 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:05.83 -08:40:07.6: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5727 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:27:04.61 -06:14:26.0: 14.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:25:15.91 -06:51:51.6: 14.84 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:15.91 -06:51:51.6: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5955 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:27:04.61 -06:14:26.0: 14.85 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:04.61 -06:14:26.0: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6356 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:30:19.37 -06:56:40.5: 14.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 16:22:01.78 -06:47:26.2: 14.80 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:30:19.37 -06:56:40.5: 14.54 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:19.37 -06:56:40.5: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7505 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 16:22:01.78 -06:47:26.2: 15.02 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:01.78 -06:47:26.2: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5522 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:59:53.28 -14:23:31.6: 14.11 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:59:53.28 -14:23:31.6: 14.06 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:59:53.28 -14:23:31.6: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.9987 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-27_05-16-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0019.fits at 15:48:55.88 -13:01:22.7: 14.27 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-26_02-37-18_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0581.fits at 15:48:55.88 -13:01:22.7: 13.79 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:48:55.88 -13:01:22.7: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.7847 delta=1.28 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out73941.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04483.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out12398.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73172.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73197.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73259.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73365.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out73854.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72904_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 72904_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72905_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 72905_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72911_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 72911_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72916_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 72916_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72918_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 72918_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:14.47 -05:31:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72920_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 72920_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72921_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 72921_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72922_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 72922_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72930_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 72930_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72931_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 72931_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:26.58 -05:25:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72934_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 72934_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:38.94 -12:45:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72935_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 72935_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:50.73 -12:29:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72936_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 72936_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:45:41.90 -12:41:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72938_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 72938_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:22.63 -05:35:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72941_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 72941_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72943_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 72943_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:26.72 -05:44:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73081_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73081_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:23.25 -13:36:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73164_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73164_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.26 -06:11:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73172_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
Preparing report for the candidate 73172_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73197_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
Preparing report for the candidate 73197_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73199_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73199_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:27.80 -14:10:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73259_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
Preparing report for the candidate 73259_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73365_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
Preparing report for the candidate 73365_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73367_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73367_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:57.34 -14:40:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73416_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73416_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:45:35.63 -14:21:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73423_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73423_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:19.97 -10:46:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73604_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73604_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:32.27 -11:18:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73615_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73615_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73776_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73776_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:32.00 -06:10:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73784_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73784_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73813_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73813_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73823_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73823_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:44.89 -05:25:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73828_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73828_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73849_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73849_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:44.30 -12:58:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73854_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
Preparing report for the candidate 73854_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73856_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73856_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73872_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73872_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73873_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73873_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73898_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73898_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73903_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73903_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73919_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73919_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73941_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73941_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:27.25 -11:52:34.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.543 4331579727534892672 246.36339050509 -11.87614009373 14.8591 14.3070 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.543#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73957_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73957_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73967_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73967_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73976_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73976_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73986_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73986_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73992_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 73992_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74003_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 74003_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74004_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 74004_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:47.79 -06:37:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74016_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 74016_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74029_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 74029_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74030_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 74030_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:14.19 -11:20:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74044_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 74044_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74045_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 74045_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74062_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 74062_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74064_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 74064_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:22.48 -10:42:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74068_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 74068_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74081_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 74081_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74086_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 74086_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74088_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 74088_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74089_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 74089_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74094_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 74094_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74111_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 74111_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74114_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 74114_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74125_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 74125_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74146_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 74146_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74155_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 74155_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74158_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 74158_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74162_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 74162_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06174_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 06174_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:00.89 -13:58:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04483_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
Preparing report for the candidate 04483_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27745_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 27745_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:29.02 -10:37:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27688_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 27688_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:20.81 -10:30:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25303_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 25303_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:54:29.32 -10:52:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49470_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 49470_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:21:24.41 -07:42:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14434_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 14434_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:19.18 -12:47:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25898_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 25898_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:54:08.82 -10:50:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12258_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 12258_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:44.28 -13:06:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51698_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042
The candidate 51698_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-15_02-10-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0042 did not pass the final checks
