This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 15.3107 2461175.8107 14.65 14:27:27.12 +02:39:38.1
350.24593 56.44052 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.986 Amelia 2 -1 2 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:27:27.12 +02:39:38.1: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:27:27.12 +02:39:38.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 15.3108* 14 27 27.12 +02 39 38.1 14.7 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461175.8107,14.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260515.3107 14.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 15.3107 2461175.8107 14.74 14:32:56.55 +07:28:53.3
358.38012 58.94169 galactic Boo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.816 Juliana 1 1 2 14.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:32:56.55 +07:28:53.3: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:32:56.55 +07:28:53.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461175.8107,14.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260515.3107 14.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461120.98046007 21.03.2026 11:31:41.750 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
First image: 2461120.98046007 21.03.2026 11:31:41.750 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Last image: 2461175.81101963 15.05.2026 07:27:42.096 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4818
Objects passed selection criteria: 4817
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4725.25
Average stars matched: 4683 (99.1059 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111408 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 15 06:04:29 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461120.98046007 21.03.2026 11:31:41.750 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
First image: 2461120.98046007 21.03.2026 11:31:41.750 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Last image: 2461175.81101963 15.05.2026 07:27:42.096 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 71
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 39 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 29446
Objects passed selection criteria: 29386
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 28356.2
Average stars matched: 27797 (98.0278 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 133836 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri May 15 06:06:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461175.81047416
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits'
wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:10.737 +06:00:06.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:17.411 +06:00:09.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:10.737 +06:00:06.66
Second-epoch image center 14:34:17.411 +06:00:09.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0277 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:14.941 +06:00:17.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:10.737 +06:00:06.66
Second-epoch image center 14:34:14.941 +06:00:17.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0177 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:17.411 +06:00:09.73
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:14.941 +06:00:17.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01046 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FT9XgGB6nN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Julj6OljF2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7OliCpCZyO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PkSoOKpI7h
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits and wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits and wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits and wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6881 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.6514 to 226.5542 deg, Dec +0.6415 to +11.2850 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.6514 to 226.5542 deg, Dec 0.6415 to 11.2850 deg
Loaded 4024 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3275 out of 3419 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3419 out of 6881 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.897100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.897100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6881 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.6514 to 226.5542 deg, Dec +0.6415 to +11.2850 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.6514 to 226.5542 deg, Dec 0.6415 to 11.2850 deg
Loaded 4024 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3275 out of 3419 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3419 out of 6881 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 5944 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.5926 to 226.4838 deg, Dec +0.6132 to +11.2719 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.5926 to 226.4838 deg, Dec 0.6132 to 11.2719 deg
Loaded 4037 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3275 out of 3377 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3377 out of 5944 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
2.5 pix Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
2.3 pix fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
15.0 mag. Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FT9XgGB6nN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=442, passed=6878
Got 6878 stars (including 6429 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6878 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6692 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6692 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.596 n_q1=257 n_q2=237 n_q3=249 n_q4=195 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.311
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits -region wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Julj6OljF2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=368, passed=5944
Got 5944 stars (including 5569 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5944 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5847 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5847 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits N_match=932 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.595 n_q1=252 n_q2=226 n_q3=251 n_q4=203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.494
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits -region wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7OliCpCZyO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=317, passed=5671
Got 5671 stars (including 5348 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5671 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5563 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.790 n_q1=257 n_q2=227 n_q3=248 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.930
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PkSoOKpI7h (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=310, passed=5461
Got 5461 stars (including 5147 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5461 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5369 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.701 n_q1=258 n_q2=220 n_q3=261 n_q4=194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.882
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits sigma_overall=0.455 worst_q_ratio=1.311
ref2=Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits sigma_overall=0.399 worst_q_ratio=1.494
new1=fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits sigma_overall=0.410 worst_q_ratio=1.930
new2=fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.882
reference average sigma_overall=0.427 worst_q_ratio=1.4025
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629_astrometric_residuals.png (932 matched stars from wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030_astrometric_residuals.png (930 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20142_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 20142_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:58:01.42 +09:24:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20145_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 20145_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:34:10.16 +04:51:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04795_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 04795_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:21:51.90 +03:54:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:10.737 +06:00:06.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:17.411 +06:00:09.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:10.737 +06:00:06.66
Second-epoch image center 14:34:17.411 +06:00:09.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0277 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:14.941 +06:00:17.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:10.737 +06:00:06.66
Second-epoch image center 14:34:14.941 +06:00:17.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0177 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:17.411 +06:00:09.73
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:14.941 +06:00:17.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01046 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nlT1YskiBn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e0QdQEYee5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6XzOvEx2LD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ik0unbwVZ2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits and wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits and wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits and wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 39488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.6471 to 226.5782 deg, Dec +0.6415 to +11.2955 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.6471 to 226.5782 deg, Dec 0.6415 to 11.2955 deg
Loaded 4037 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3115 out of 3434 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3434 out of 39488 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.770800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.770800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 39488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.6471 to 226.5782 deg, Dec +0.6415 to +11.2955 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.6471 to 226.5782 deg, Dec 0.6415 to 11.2955 deg
Loaded 4037 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3115 out of 3434 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3434 out of 39488 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 34124 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.5529 to 226.4852 deg, Dec +0.6132 to +11.2746 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.5529 to 226.4852 deg, Dec 0.6132 to 11.2746 deg
Loaded 4053 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3173 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 34124 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 45 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
2.2 pix Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
15.2 mag. Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nlT1YskiBn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1720, passed=39467
Got 39467 stars (including 37694 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39467 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.578 n_q1=262 n_q2=239 n_q3=244 n_q4=193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.302
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits -region wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.e0QdQEYee5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1344, passed=34105
Got 34105 stars (including 32730 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34105 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33362 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33363 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.570 n_q1=242 n_q2=246 n_q3=243 n_q4=199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.430
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits -region wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6XzOvEx2LD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1301, passed=31181
Got 31181 stars (including 29834 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31181 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30564 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30565 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits N_match=936 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.848 n_q1=263 n_q2=225 n_q3=260 n_q4=188 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.121
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ik0unbwVZ2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1249, passed=30496
Got 30496 stars (including 29206 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30496 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1024)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits N_match=931 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.730 n_q1=261 n_q2=213 n_q3=274 n_q4=183 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.968
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-26-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0030.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-15_CI_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_023953_TTUQ2b1x1_580133_8OhEoeR3/wcs_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:57:43.55 +04:38:15.5: 15.00 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:55:46.21 +04:49:31.7: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:49:04.64 +05:41:43.9: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:59:58.86 +08:10:49.7: 15.46 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:45:00.20 +03:28:55.1: 14.29 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 15:01:15.31 +01:47:50.7: 14.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:37:01.33 +04:30:58.0: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:57:43.55 +04:38:15.5: 15.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:43.55 +04:38:15.5: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8025 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:59:58.86 +08:10:49.7: 14.54 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:49:04.64 +05:41:43.9: 14.31 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:04.64 +05:41:43.9: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3604 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:58.86 +08:10:49.7: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6089 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 15:01:15.31 +01:47:50.7: 15.02 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:15.31 +01:47:50.7: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7522 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:58:20.71 +07:38:41.5: 14.79 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:40:39.26 +02:00:04.8: 15.17 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:37:01.33 +04:30:58.0: 14.11 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:01.33 +04:30:58.0: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4712 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:55:46.21 +04:49:31.7: 15.13 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:46.21 +04:49:31.7: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=14.7303 delta=-1.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:45:00.20 +03:28:55.1: 14.22 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:45:00.20 +03:28:55.1: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2098 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:40:39.26 +02:00:04.8: 15.23 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:58:20.71 +07:38:41.5: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:40:39.26 +02:00:04.8: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6300 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:20.71 +07:38:41.5: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8183 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:57:25.73 +04:56:16.1: 14.78 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:51:04.75 +07:06:51.9: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:27:27.12 +02:39:38.1: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:59:45.98 +04:19:26.4: 15.13 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:57:25.73 +04:56:16.1: 15.20 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:58:09.97 +04:06:06.1: 15.30 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:25.73 +04:56:16.1: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7112 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:51:04.75 +07:06:51.9: 15.34 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:04.75 +07:06:51.9: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6644 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:59:45.98 +04:19:26.4: 15.45 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:45.98 +04:19:26.4: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.8463 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:56:38.59 +06:53:27.5: 15.05 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:52:51.74 +01:44:52.4: 15.44 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:27:27.12 +02:39:38.1: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:59:38.99 +04:57:25.3: 15.08 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:58:09.97 +04:06:06.1: 14.94 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:59:46.07 +04:56:55.3: 14.69 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:09.97 +04:06:06.1: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6969 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:46:45.91 +02:44:03.7: 15.29 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:56:38.59 +06:53:27.5: 15.24 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:52:51.74 +01:44:52.4: 15.01 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:51.74 +01:44:52.4: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8416 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:38.59 +06:53:27.5: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8496 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:59:46.07 +04:56:55.3: 14.97 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:46.07 +04:56:55.3: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8548 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:59:38.99 +04:57:25.3: 15.25 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:38.99 +04:57:25.3: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8984 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:46:45.91 +02:44:03.7: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:46:45.91 +02:44:03.7: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7566 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:42:47.41 +10:10:34.0: 15.38 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 15:00:56.67 +08:24:12.1: 15.22 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:42:47.41 +10:10:34.0: 15.58 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:42:47.41 +10:10:34.0: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8610 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:53:51.57 +02:03:26.9: 15.39 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:59:44.20 +06:15:05.3: 14.86 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 15:00:56.67 +08:24:12.1: 15.37 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:56.67 +08:24:12.1: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8666 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 15:01:18.45 +06:17:48.5: 14.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:32:56.55 +07:28:53.3: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:57:04.76 +06:56:50.9: 15.07 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:53:51.57 +02:03:26.9: 15.20 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 15:01:18.45 +06:17:48.5: 15.14 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:51.57 +02:03:26.9: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9315 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:59:44.20 +06:15:05.3: 14.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:18.45 +06:17:48.5: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8205 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:44.20 +06:15:05.3: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6024 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:49:05.41 +03:41:07.9: 14.91 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:32:56.55 +07:28:53.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:58:14.09 +05:12:08.1: 15.74 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:57:04.76 +06:56:50.9: 15.17 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:42:42.42 +08:37:19.9: 15.31 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:04.76 +06:56:50.9: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8075 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:49:05.41 +03:41:07.9: 15.22 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:05.41 +03:41:07.9: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8409 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:48:02.41 +03:37:15.1: 15.68 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:58:14.09 +05:12:08.1: 15.15 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:42:42.42 +08:37:19.9: 15.74 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:14.09 +05:12:08.1: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.9815 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:42:42.42 +08:37:19.9: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9901 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:55:44.19 +04:32:19.6: 15.13 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:43:07.34 +02:40:38.1: 15.26 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:50:11.39 +07:14:39.0: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:48:02.41 +03:37:15.1: 15.15 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:02.41 +03:37:15.1: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9631 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:43:07.34 +02:40:38.1: 15.59 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:43:07.34 +02:40:38.1: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9784 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:51:48.74 +05:21:25.4: 15.19 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:55:44.19 +04:32:19.6: 15.16 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:50:11.39 +07:14:39.0: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:44.19 +04:32:19.6: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9649 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:11.39 +07:14:39.0: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8026 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:47:17.76 +08:15:59.8: 15.55 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_06-31-41_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0529.fits at 14:37:47.15 +02:04:33.5: 15.10 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:51:48.74 +05:21:25.4: 15.27 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:48.74 +05:21:25.4: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9464 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:47:17.76 +08:15:59.8: 15.08 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:47:17.76 +08:15:59.8: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9658 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-11-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0629.fits at 14:37:47.15 +02:04:33.5: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:37:47.15 +02:04:33.5: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8243 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51535.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51640.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51417_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51417_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51423_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51423_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51425_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51425_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51443_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51443_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:00:11.50 +07:38:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51456_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51456_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51501_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51501_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51502_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51502_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:51:34.93 +03:33:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51514_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51514_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51516_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51516_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51519_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51519_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51523_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51523_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:48:17.12 +01:49:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51524_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51524_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51525_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51525_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51529_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51529_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51530_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51530_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51535_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
Preparing report for the candidate 51535_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51536_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51536_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51543_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51543_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:49:11.18 +08:02:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51555_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51555_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51559_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51559_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51560_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51560_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51573_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51573_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51575_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51575_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51577_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51577_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51588_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51588_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:53:58.84 +05:03:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51591_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51591_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51598_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51598_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51599_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51599_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51601_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51601_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51604_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51604_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51610_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51610_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:53:38.76 +02:54:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51626_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51626_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:56:23.96 +04:44:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51631_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51631_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51640_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
Preparing report for the candidate 51640_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51646_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51646_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51649_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51649_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51652_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51652_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51671_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51671_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51676_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51676_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51696_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51696_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51704_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51704_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51710_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51710_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51716_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51716_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51723_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 51723_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27326_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031
The candidate 27326_fd_Vir-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_02-27-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0031 did not pass the final checks