This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.3601 2461174.8601 13.84 14:41:41.30 -01:48:49.3
349.87084 50.72827 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1278 Kenya 2 -0 2 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:41:41.30 -01:48:49.3: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:41:41.30 -01:48:49.3: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 14.3601* 14 41 41.30 -01 48 49.3 13.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461174.8601,13.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260514.3601 13.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.3601 2461174.8601 14.25 14:52:42.18 +01:27:47.3
356.62422 51.23099 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1926 Demiddelaer 1 -1 1 14.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:52:42.18 +01:27:47.3: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:52:42.18 +01:27:47.3: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 14.3601* 14 52 42.18 +01 27 47.3 14.2 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461174.8601,14.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260514.3601 14.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.3601 2461174.8601 14.48 14:32:33.83 -05:11:54.0
343.81690 49.47495 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1107 Lictoria 1 -0 1 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:32:33.83 -05:11:54.0: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:32:33.83 -05:11:54.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 14.3601* 14 32 33.83 -05 11 54.0 14.5 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461174.8601,14.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260514.3601 14.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.3601 2461174.8601 14.55 14:29:16.33 -02:29:49.4
345.30362 52.13749 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3002 Delasalle 1 -0 1 14.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:29:16.33 -02:29:49.4: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:29:16.33 -02:29:49.4: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 05 14.3601* 14 29 16.33 -02 29 49.4 14.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461174.8601,14.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260514.3601 14.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
First image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Last image: 2461174.86034942 14.05.2026 08:38:44.190 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5100
Objects passed selection criteria: 5100
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4984
Average stars matched: 4874.5 (97.803 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111584 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 14 04:51:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
First image: 2461146.84997773 16.04.2026 08:23:48.076 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Last image: 2461174.86034942 14.05.2026 08:38:44.190 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 115
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 32188
Objects passed selection criteria: 32145
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 31409.8
Average stars matched: 30338 (96.5878 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 136332 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 14 04:52:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461174.85983574
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:17.773 -01:59:54.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:17.773 -01:59:54.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0276 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:20.955 -01:59:38.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:20.955 -01:59:38.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0186 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:17.773 -01:59:54.00
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:20.955 -01:59:38.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01393 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kMtjpXt3Zc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JfUkXV3seV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0bXHJU0kHB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zevJ1E3EcE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to +3.7684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to 3.7684 deg
Loaded 4534 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3368 out of 3527 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3527 out of 6865 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.858600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.858600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to +3.7684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3753 to 226.8090 deg, Dec -7.7656 to 3.7684 deg
Loaded 4534 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3368 out of 3527 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3527 out of 6865 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 6283 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.6881 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3215 to +3.3059 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.6881 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3215 to 3.3059 deg
Loaded 4006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3333 out of 3439 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3439 out of 6283 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.3 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
2.3 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
15.0 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.kMtjpXt3Zc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, passed=6865
Got 6865 stars (including 6349 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6865 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=272 n_q2=182 n_q3=211 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JfUkXV3seV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=429, passed=6283
Got 6283 stars (including 5846 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6283 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.593 n_q1=261 n_q2=207 n_q3=204 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.399
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0bXHJU0kHB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=366, passed=5941
Got 5941 stars (including 5572 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5941 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.520 n_q1=273 n_q2=192 n_q3=218 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.323
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zevJ1E3EcE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=339, passed=5583
Got 5583 stars (including 5239 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5583 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits N_match=928 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.449 n_q1=292 n_q2=177 n_q3=223 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.342
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.118
ref2=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits sigma_overall=0.424 worst_q_ratio=1.399
new1=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits sigma_overall=0.393 worst_q_ratio=1.323
new2=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.342
reference average sigma_overall=0.3795 worst_q_ratio=1.2585
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267_astrometric_residuals.png (935 matched stars from wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169_astrometric_residuals.png (930 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170_astrometric_residuals.png (928 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:29:02.79 -04:26:09.7: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:29:02.79 -04:26:09.7: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:29:02.79 -04:26:09.7: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2658 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20326_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 20326_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:41:19.10 -02:06:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20329_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 20329_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:33:07.26 -00:32:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20330_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 20330_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:17.773 -01:59:54.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:17.773 -01:59:54.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0276 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:20.955 -01:59:38.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:24.038 -02:00:26.77
Second-epoch image center 14:34:20.955 -01:59:38.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0186 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:17.773 -01:59:54.00
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:20.955 -01:59:38.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01393 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bAESua7z4o
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BZBy59u41I
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.slMsfjtvgn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hxpxBcHh26
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits and wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to +3.7692 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to 3.7692 deg
Loaded 4538 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3208 out of 3567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3567 out of 43198 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.715350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.715350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to +3.7692 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.3729 to 226.8089 deg, Dec -7.7694 to 3.7692 deg
Loaded 4538 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3208 out of 3567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3567 out of 43198 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 36035 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.6882 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3235 to +3.3190 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.6882 to 226.5265 deg, Dec -7.3235 to 3.3190 deg
Loaded 4013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3249 out of 3501 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3501 out of 36035 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 66 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.2 pix Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
15.2 mag. Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.bAESua7z4o (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1997, passed=43174
Got 43174 stars (including 41107 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43174 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=266 n_q2=181 n_q3=215 n_q4=268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BZBy59u41I (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1833, passed=36031
Got 36031 stars (including 34149 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36031 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits N_match=927 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.583 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.619 n_q1=275 n_q2=191 n_q3=213 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.475
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits -region wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.slMsfjtvgn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1629, passed=35009
Got 35009 stars (including 33330 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35009 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 921 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits N_match=921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.487 n_q1=282 n_q2=183 n_q3=225 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.382
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hxpxBcHh26 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1502, passed=33322
Got 33322 stars (including 31786 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33322 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32457 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1014)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits N_match=922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.453 n_q1=301 n_q2=166 n_q3=232 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.447
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-37-59_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_044445_TTUQ2b1x1_3176659_HIZzJn5o/wcs_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:52:42.18 +01:27:47.3: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:52:54.63 +00:59:44.2: 14.70 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:41:41.30 -01:48:49.3: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:43.19 -02:20:37.1: 14.65 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:45:08.25 -05:28:46.6: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:37.71 -02:49:13.1: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:54:17.82 -05:16:55.8: 14.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:03.92 -03:16:43.8: 14.16 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:32:33.83 -05:11:54.0: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:52:42.18 +01:27:47.3: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:52:54.63 +00:59:44.2: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:41:41.30 -01:48:49.3: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:54.63 +00:59:44.2: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7200 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:43.19 -02:20:37.1: 14.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:45:08.25 -05:28:46.6: 14.49 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:43.19 -02:20:37.1: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4011 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:45:08.25 -05:28:46.6: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5298 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:24:10.54 -04:36:10.0: 15.00 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:54:17.82 -05:16:55.8: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:37.71 -02:49:13.1: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:32:33.83 -05:11:54.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:03.92 -03:16:43.8: 14.61 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:17.82 -05:16:55.8: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5084 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:03.92 -03:16:43.8: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4602 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:37.71 -02:49:13.1: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6080 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:24:10.54 -04:36:10.0: 15.03 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:24:10.54 -04:36:10.0: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5388 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:49.99 -05:02:19.0: 14.55 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:43.45 +02:13:46.8: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:49:24.70 -05:18:06.1: 15.32 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:02.44 +00:14:39.1: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:03.27 -05:35:52.1: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:00:49.99 -05:02:19.0: 15.09 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:17.53 -05:44:25.7: 14.63 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:49:24.70 -05:18:06.1: 15.21 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:43.45 +02:13:46.8: 14.90 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:49.99 -05:02:19.0: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6045 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:24.70 -05:18:06.1: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7326 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:43.45 +02:13:46.8: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7279 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:55:53.52 +01:49:15.5: 15.23 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:03.27 -05:35:52.1: 14.97 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:00:02.44 +00:14:39.1: 14.75 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:03.27 -05:35:52.1: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5905 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:02.44 +00:14:39.1: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8434 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:17.53 -05:44:25.7: 14.55 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:17.53 -05:44:25.7: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6483 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:55:53.52 +01:49:15.5: 15.02 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:53.52 +01:49:15.5: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8864 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:29:16.33 -02:29:49.4: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:51:27.25 -05:41:19.4: 15.08 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:48:29.14 -04:12:40.8: 14.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:29:16.33 -02:29:49.4: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:51:27.25 -05:41:19.4: 14.96 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:48:29.14 -04:12:40.8: 14.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:27.25 -05:41:19.4: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6303 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:29.14 -04:12:40.8: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7066 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:53:35.35 -04:32:03.0: 15.00 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:48:52.79 -05:20:03.6: 14.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:53.92 -04:17:01.4: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:27.88 -00:51:37.0: 15.19 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:53:35.35 -04:32:03.0: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:35.35 -04:32:03.0: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8637 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:48:52.79 -05:20:03.6: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:52.79 -05:20:03.6: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4530 delta=-1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:53.92 -04:17:01.4: 15.27 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:53.92 -04:17:01.4: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8253 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:27.88 -00:51:37.0: 15.04 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:55:52.89 +00:25:10.3: 14.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:27.88 -00:51:37.0: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8134 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:50:25.72 -02:34:37.5: 14.79 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:55:52.89 +00:25:10.3: 15.09 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:52.89 +00:25:10.3: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7825 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:50:25.72 -02:34:37.5: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:56:13.34 -02:22:22.3: 14.91 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:25.72 -02:34:37.5: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8603 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:52:37.72 -04:26:41.4: 14.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:16.63 +00:42:56.8: 15.19 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:50:34.98 +00:41:21.9: 15.22 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:56:13.34 -02:22:22.3: 15.11 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:13.34 -02:22:22.3: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7927 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:52:37.72 -04:26:41.4: 14.59 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:37.72 -04:26:41.4: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8311 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:00:16.63 +00:42:56.8: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:16.63 +00:42:56.8: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7789 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:50:34.98 +00:41:21.9: 15.19 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:34.98 +00:41:21.9: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8982 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:15.51 -00:44:47.1: 15.11 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:44.55 -05:19:27.3: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:15.51 -00:44:47.1: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:15.51 -00:44:47.1: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8211 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:54.12 -00:38:17.6: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:48:31.07 -01:51:24.4: 15.30 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:44.55 -05:19:27.3: 14.93 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:44.55 -05:19:27.3: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7036 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:29:21.26 +01:27:13.4: 15.43 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:29:38.28 -02:13:31.2: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:54.12 -00:38:17.6: 14.92 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:48:31.07 -01:51:24.4: 15.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:54.12 -00:38:17.6: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8340 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:31.07 -01:51:24.4: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9348 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:29:21.26 +01:27:13.4: 15.30 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:48:22.34 -04:46:57.7: 15.01 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:29:21.26 +01:27:13.4: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8027 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:29:38.28 -02:13:31.2: 15.22 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:29:38.28 -02:13:31.2: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9047 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:26.22 +02:07:31.6: 15.18 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:48:22.34 -04:46:57.7: 15.47 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:22.34 -04:46:57.7: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8975 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:26.22 +02:07:31.6: 15.48 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:26.22 +02:07:31.6: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9548 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:49:40.11 -06:13:15.5: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:56:13.23 -02:14:55.1: 15.04 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:12.75 -01:16:22.7: 14.77 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:01:26.94 -03:53:32.8: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:12.75 -01:16:22.7: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:12.75 -01:16:22.7: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7776 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:58:22.33 -02:59:13.9: 15.79 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:49:40.11 -06:13:15.5: 15.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:40.11 -06:13:15.5: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7335 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:45:34.71 +01:51:30.3: 15.73 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:01:26.94 -03:53:32.8: 14.86 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:56:13.23 -02:14:55.1: 15.37 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:26.94 -03:53:32.8: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8606 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:13.23 -02:14:55.1: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8604 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:58:22.33 -02:59:13.9: 15.61 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.70 +/- 0.26
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:22.33 -02:59:13.9: ref_mag=15.70 +/- 0.26 new_mean_mag=14.8367 delta=0.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:45:34.71 +01:51:30.3: 15.24 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:45:34.71 +01:51:30.3: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.8585 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:45:05.00 -06:13:15.6: 15.30 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:45:05.00 -06:13:15.6: 15.36 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:45:05.00 -06:13:15.6: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8917 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:44:00.77 -05:14:02.2: 14.99 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:57:53.61 -02:28:46.6: 15.08 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:54:59.56 +00:22:29.9: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:39.34 -00:45:58.0: 15.17 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:44:00.77 -05:14:02.2: 15.34 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:00.77 -05:14:02.2: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8629 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:57:53.61 -02:28:46.6: 15.18 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:53.61 -02:28:46.6: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9276 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:27:45.16 -01:33:25.1: 15.10 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:39.34 -00:45:58.0: 15.17 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:39.34 -00:45:58.0: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8846 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:54:59.56 +00:22:29.9: 14.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:39.98 -03:48:44.3: 15.28 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:59.56 +00:22:29.9: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9266 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:27:45.16 -01:33:25.1: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:27:45.16 -01:33:25.1: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8435 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:39.98 -03:48:44.3: 14.94 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:39.98 -03:48:44.3: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8549 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:01:19.75 -02:30:34.2: 14.98 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:52:00.20 -05:53:54.2: 15.33 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 15:00:16.07 -04:19:55.7: 15.10 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:01:19.75 -02:30:34.2: 14.93 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:19.75 -02:30:34.2: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9683 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:52:00.20 -05:53:54.2: 14.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:00.20 -05:53:54.2: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8035 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:49:43.70 -00:46:40.6: 15.21 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:59:54.19 -03:27:28.4: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 15:00:16.07 -04:19:55.7: 15.33 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:16.07 -04:19:55.7: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9133 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:50:06.16 -05:10:55.5: 15.22 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:59:54.19 -03:27:28.4: 15.02 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:54.19 -03:27:28.4: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9490 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:49:43.70 -00:46:40.6: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:49:43.70 -00:46:40.6: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9698 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:50:06.16 -05:10:55.5: 15.20 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:06.16 -05:10:55.5: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8381 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:27:09.95 -06:08:30.8: 14.73 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:41:59.94 -04:23:45.7: 14.93 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-16_03-23-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0267.fits at 14:46:46.84 -05:55:00.3: 15.34 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:27:09.95 -06:08:30.8: 15.15 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:27:09.95 -06:08:30.8: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7979 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:41:59.94 -04:23:45.7: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_02-52-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0614.fits at 14:46:46.84 -05:55:00.3: 15.09 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:59.94 -04:23:45.7: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9658 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:46:46.84 -05:55:00.3: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8955 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52479.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52503.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52516.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52626.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52412_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52412_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52413_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52413_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:42:34.48 -03:33:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52414_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52414_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52419_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52419_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:35:21.26 -03:07:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52420_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52420_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:00:51.23 -04:32:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52422_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52422_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:22:28.65 +00:49:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52479_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
Preparing report for the candidate 52479_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52503_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
Preparing report for the candidate 52503_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52504_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52504_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:43:03.62 -02:22:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52510_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52510_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52512_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52512_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:30:24.11 -06:13:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52516_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
Preparing report for the candidate 52516_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52528_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52528_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52546_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52546_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52552_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52552_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52555_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52555_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52567_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52567_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52584_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52584_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52599_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52599_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52604_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52604_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52609_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52609_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52614_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52614_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52620_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52620_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52621_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52621_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52626_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
Preparing report for the candidate 52626_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52629_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52629_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52642_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52642_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52644_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52644_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52647_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52647_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52648_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52648_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52664_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52664_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52666_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52666_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52668_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52668_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52669_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52669_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52671_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52671_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52673_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52673_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52692_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52692_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52694_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52694_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52717_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52717_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52719_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52719_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52721_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52721_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52722_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52722_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52732_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52732_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52735_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52735_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52738_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52738_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52739_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52739_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52744_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52744_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52745_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52745_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52747_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52747_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52758_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52758_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52765_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52765_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52767_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52767_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52770_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52770_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52785_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52785_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52791_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52791_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52802_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52802_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52803_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52803_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52817_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52817_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52819_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52819_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52821_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52821_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52824_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52824_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52826_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52826_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52890_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52890_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52904_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52904_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52923_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52923_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52935_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170
The candidate 52935_fd_Vir-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-14_03-38-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170 did not pass the final checks