This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.3764 2461174.8764 10.12 17:23:44.38 +59:05:17.4
87.75330 34.18927 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 5.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSVS J1723442+590516
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.087 R1 Y 0.359 R1 153.000000000000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:23:44.38 +59:05:17.4: 11.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:23:44.38 +59:05:17.4: 11.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.05 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1723442+590516,2461174.8764,10.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1723442+590516 20260514.3764 10.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.3764 2461174.8764 13.32 17:33:31.19 +61:16:08.9
90.28439 32.85463 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" LINEAR 20801695
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.160 CV Y 0.880 CV 0.601058000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:33:31.19 +61:16:08.9: 14.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:33:31.19 +61:16:08.9: 14.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
LINEAR 20801695,2461174.8764,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
LINEAR 20801695 20260514.3764 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 05 14.3764 2461174.8764 13.77 17:27:10.70 +61:45:29.6
90.92564 33.57788 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" Karachurin 12
Type: UGZ
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.800 V 14.900 V B2
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:27:10.70 +61:45:29.6: 14.83 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:27:10.70 +61:45:29.6: 14.81 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Karachurin 12,2461174.8764,13.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Karachurin 12 20260514.3764 13.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.90256731 16.04.2026 09:39:31.816 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
First image: 2461146.90256731 16.04.2026 09:39:31.816 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
Last image: 2461174.87662312 14.05.2026 09:02:10.238 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 27
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11650
Objects passed selection criteria: 11646
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11018.8
Average stars matched: 10792.2 (97.9444 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116672 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 14 04:40:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.90256731 16.04.2026 09:39:31.816 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
First image: 2461146.90256731 16.04.2026 09:39:31.816 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
Last image: 2461174.87662312 14.05.2026 09:02:10.238 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 42
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.14
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 32 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 66295
Objects passed selection criteria: 66139
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 60052.8
Average stars matched: 58497.8 (97.4106 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 165696 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed May 13 17:47:49 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-54-ga455e386
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-05-13)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu May 14 04:42:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461174.87611389
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits'
wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.982 +61:59:53.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:09:04.950 +61:59:55.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:34.982 +61:59:53.07
Second-epoch image center 17:09:04.950 +61:59:55.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0586 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:09:03.651 +61:59:26.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:34.982 +61:59:53.07
Second-epoch image center 17:09:03.651 +61:59:26.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0566 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:09:04.950 +61:59:55.75
Second-epoch second image center 17:09:03.651 +61:59:26.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00847 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3mGyimzWmS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QS9BnWy4WA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mtR6iYb32W
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0tniu5nl6w
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits and wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits and wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits and wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11909 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 238.2254 to 277.0333 deg, Dec +55.4669 to +67.3466 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 238.2254 to 277.0333 deg, Dec 55.4669 to 67.3466 deg
Loaded 9879 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5974 out of 6361 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6361 out of 11909 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.862150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.862150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11909 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 238.2254 to 277.0333 deg, Dec +55.4669 to +67.3466 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 238.2254 to 277.0333 deg, Dec 55.4669 to 67.3466 deg
Loaded 9879 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5974 out of 6361 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6361 out of 11909 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 238.2254 to 277.0335 deg, Dec +55.4669 to +67.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 238.2254 to 277.0335 deg, Dec 55.4669 to 67.3458 deg
Loaded 9878 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5974 out of 6371 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6371 out of 11927 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 27 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
2.2 pix Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
3.0 pix fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
3.1 pix fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
15.4 mag. Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3mGyimzWmS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=889, passed=11909
Got 11909 stars (including 11009 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11909 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=238 n_q2=239 n_q3=227 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.221
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits -region wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QS9BnWy4WA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=902, passed=11927
Got 11927 stars (including 11013 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11744 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.376 n_q1=235 n_q2=241 n_q3=225 n_q4=269 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits -region wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mtR6iYb32W (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=452, passed=10346
Got 10346 stars (including 9885 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10346 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=293 n_q2=258 n_q3=230 n_q4=184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.198
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0tniu5nl6w (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=441, passed=10167
Got 10167 stars (including 9718 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10033 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=314 n_q2=239 n_q3=239 n_q4=174 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.221
ref2=Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits sigma_overall=0.361 worst_q_ratio=1.181
new1=fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits sigma_overall=0.325 worst_q_ratio=1.198
new2=fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits sigma_overall=0.351 worst_q_ratio=1.113
reference average sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.201
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Distribution of catalog-matched stars across the image:
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 16:48:20.48 +62:25:16.8: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:10:19.37 +62:58:18.7: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:20:08.31 +61:35:34.7: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:13:47.41 +62:07:05.4: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 18:13:46.38 +62:35:11.9: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:23:54.27 +63:13:47.8: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:10:19.36 +62:47:18.8: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 16:55:13.62 +63:25:30.7: 12.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:19:28.23 +63:00:26.1: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:16:18.57 +62:49:55.2: 12.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 16:48:20.48 +62:25:16.8: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:20:08.31 +61:35:34.7: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:13:47.41 +62:07:05.4: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:10:19.37 +62:58:18.7: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:23:54.27 +63:13:47.8: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 18:13:46.38 +62:35:11.9: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 16:55:13.62 +63:25:30.7: 12.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:10:19.36 +62:47:18.8: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:08.31 +61:35:34.7: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2605 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:20.48 +62:25:16.8: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2802 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:13:47.41 +62:07:05.4: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3044 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.54 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:19.37 +62:58:18.7: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3277 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:23:54.27 +63:13:47.8: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2907 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:13:46.38 +62:35:11.9: ref_mag=11.54 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8778 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:13.62 +63:25:30.7: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4063 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:19.36 +62:47:18.8: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3876 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:19:28.23 +63:00:26.1: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:19:28.23 +63:00:26.1: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4070 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:16:18.57 +62:49:55.2: 12.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:16:18.57 +62:49:55.2: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4195 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:26:53.18 +62:02:29.7: 12.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:14:01.13 +61:19:04.0: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:17:45.06 +61:59:25.9: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:20:12.22 +62:07:52.3: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:27:32.91 +62:25:58.4: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:28:28.75 +63:08:14.9: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:52:42.47 +60:21:59.6: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:21:50.39 +62:54:32.0: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:18:41.24 +62:41:19.7: 12.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:27:12.83 +61:55:53.9: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:17:45.06 +61:59:25.9: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:27:32.91 +62:25:58.4: 12.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:20:12.22 +62:07:52.3: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:52:42.47 +60:21:59.6: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:28:28.75 +63:08:14.9: 12.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:26:53.18 +62:02:29.7: 12.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:14:01.13 +61:19:04.0: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:17:45.06 +61:59:25.9: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3973 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:27:32.91 +62:25:58.4: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4313 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:12.22 +62:07:52.3: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4026 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:52:42.47 +60:21:59.6: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4440 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:28:28.75 +63:08:14.9: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4298 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:26:53.18 +62:02:29.7: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4762 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:14:01.13 +61:19:04.0: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4883 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:18:41.24 +62:41:19.7: 12.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:21:50.39 +62:54:32.0: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:18:41.24 +62:41:19.7: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5014 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:21:50.39 +62:54:32.0: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5335 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:27:12.83 +61:55:53.9: 12.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:27:12.83 +61:55:53.9: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5224 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:16:50.58 +62:12:50.8: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:44:02.08 +59:26:05.1: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:14:03.91 +60:58:58.6: 12.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:44:02.08 +59:26:05.1: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:16:50.58 +62:12:50.8: 12.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:14:03.91 +60:58:58.6: 12.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:44:02.08 +59:26:05.1: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5320 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:14:03.91 +60:58:58.6: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5087 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:16:50.58 +62:12:50.8: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5098 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20610_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20610_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:55.67 +56:24:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20646_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20646_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20657_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20657_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:44.40 +61:51:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20664_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20664_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20666_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20666_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20667_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20667_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20668_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20668_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20670_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20670_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20671_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20671_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20672_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20672_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20673_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20673_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20678_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20678_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20680_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20680_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20681_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20681_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20686_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20686_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:23.35 +61:13:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20689_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20689_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20691_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20691_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20696_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20696_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20704_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20704_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20705_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20705_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20717_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20717_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20718_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20718_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20719_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20719_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20726_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20726_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20735_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20735_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20738_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 20738_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11463_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 11463_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:34.39 +65:57:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.982 +61:59:53.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:09:04.950 +61:59:55.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:34.982 +61:59:53.07
Second-epoch image center 17:09:04.950 +61:59:55.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0586 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:09:03.651 +61:59:26.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:34.982 +61:59:53.07
Second-epoch image center 17:09:03.651 +61:59:26.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0566 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:09:04.950 +61:59:55.75
Second-epoch second image center 17:09:03.651 +61:59:26.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00847 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iBaDJTElHJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fIEroPzU0f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NN7LVZBeDu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qA4CXk3Vdd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits and wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits and wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits and wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 71451 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 238.1199 to 277.0472 deg, Dec +55.4670 to +67.3533 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 238.1199 to 277.0472 deg, Dec 55.4670 to 67.3533 deg
Loaded 9914 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5400 out of 6419 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6419 out of 71451 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.738300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.738300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.14
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 71451 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 238.1199 to 277.0472 deg, Dec +55.4670 to +67.3533 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 238.1199 to 277.0472 deg, Dec 55.4670 to 67.3533 deg
Loaded 9914 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5400 out of 6419 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6419 out of 71451 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 71604 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 238.1202 to 277.0335 deg, Dec +55.4669 to +67.3474 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 238.1202 to 277.0335 deg, Dec 55.4669 to 67.3474 deg
Loaded 9909 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5403 out of 6424 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6424 out of 71604 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 38 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
2.0 pix Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
2.8 pix fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
2.8 pix fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
15.6 mag. Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.iBaDJTElHJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=4544, passed=71422
Got 71422 stars (including 66756 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71422 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70376 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70377 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70377 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=250 n_q2=237 n_q3=232 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits -region wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fIEroPzU0f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=40, blended=4607, passed=71564
Got 71564 stars (including 66840 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71564 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.415 n_q1=247 n_q2=239 n_q3=238 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits -region wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NN7LVZBeDu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2369, passed=49950
Got 49950 stars (including 47544 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49950 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48996 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48998 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48998 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.272 n_q1=280 n_q2=255 n_q3=233 n_q4=197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.247
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qA4CXk3Vdd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2272, passed=49009
Got 49009 stars (including 46676 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49009 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=298 n_q2=243 n_q3=239 n_q4=184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.132
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-01-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0219.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-05-14_CI_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_043455_TTUQ1b1x1_1668085_nepeU3ps/wcs_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:49:55.51 +60:05:10.0: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 18:03:31.47 +63:48:08.7: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:20:01.55 +64:42:17.5: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 18:07:44.69 +62:33:36.7: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:34:22.94 +60:34:38.8: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:49:29.31 +59:31:34.8: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:16:48.48 +62:33:51.5: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 18:03:31.47 +63:48:08.7: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:49:55.51 +60:05:10.0: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:03:31.47 +63:48:08.7: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7687 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:49:55.51 +60:05:10.0: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0225 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:20:01.55 +64:42:17.5: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:34:22.94 +60:34:38.8: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 18:07:44.69 +62:33:36.7: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:49:29.31 +59:31:34.8: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:01.55 +64:42:17.5: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9004 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:34:22.94 +60:34:38.8: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9754 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:07:44.69 +62:33:36.7: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9702 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:49:29.31 +59:31:34.8: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5986 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 18:09:12.47 +59:45:29.2: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 16:19:04.53 +56:44:46.0: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:16:48.48 +62:33:51.5: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:16:48.48 +62:33:51.5: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0360 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:29:27.20 +63:52:11.2: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 18:09:12.47 +59:45:29.2: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:09:12.47 +59:45:29.2: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6098 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 16:19:04.53 +56:44:46.0: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:04.53 +56:44:46.0: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5790 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 16:32:39.69 +62:52:49.5: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 18:04:09.99 +61:34:34.0: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 16:50:46.20 +63:08:33.3: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 16:32:46.77 +66:46:42.2: 14.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:28:26.99 +59:02:56.9: 14.23 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:29:27.20 +63:52:11.2: 14.29 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:29:27.20 +63:52:11.2: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8530 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 16:32:39.69 +62:52:49.5: 13.88 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:39.69 +62:52:49.5: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8543 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 16:50:46.20 +63:08:33.3: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 18:04:09.99 +61:34:34.0: 14.33 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:50:46.20 +63:08:33.3: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7861 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:28:26.99 +59:02:56.9: 14.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:04:09.99 +61:34:34.0: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8549 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 16:32:46.77 +66:46:42.2: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:28:26.99 +59:02:56.9: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8620 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:46.77 +66:46:42.2: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0333 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 16:49:34.79 +59:03:29.8: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:41:45.02 +64:07:10.9: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 18:03:20.54 +59:40:59.0: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:55:26.73 +59:33:22.3: 14.97 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 16:36:59.52 +66:05:47.2: 15.34 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 16:49:34.79 +59:03:29.8: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:49:34.79 +59:03:29.8: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9396 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:41:45.02 +64:07:10.9: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:55:26.73 +59:33:22.3: 14.74 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:41:45.02 +64:07:10.9: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0864 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 18:03:20.54 +59:40:59.0: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:55:26.73 +59:33:22.3: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3485 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:03:20.54 +59:40:59.0: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1370 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 16:37:10.16 +64:57:44.1: 15.37 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 16:16:12.62 +64:32:43.6: 15.41 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:23:44.38 +59:05:17.4: 11.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 16:36:59.52 +66:05:47.2: 14.91 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:33:31.19 +61:16:08.9: 14.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:59.52 +66:05:47.2: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6232 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:27:10.70 +61:45:29.6: 14.83 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 16:37:10.16 +64:57:44.1: 15.21 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:10.16 +64:57:44.1: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9053 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 16:16:12.62 +64:32:43.6: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:12.62 +64:32:43.6: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7855 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:23:44.38 +59:05:17.4: 11.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.05 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:23:44.38 +59:05:17.4: ref_mag=11.05 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1126 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:33:31.19 +61:16:08.9: 14.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:33:31.19 +61:16:08.9: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3196 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:27:10.70 +61:45:29.6: 14.81 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-39-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0320.fits at 17:08:59.55 +62:53:54.8: 14.74 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:27:10.70 +61:45:29.6: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.7529 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-40-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0321.fits at 17:08:59.55 +62:53:54.8: 14.64 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:59.55 +62:53:54.8: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4294 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16404.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34031.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36657.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87106_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87106_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87109_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87109_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87110_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87110_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87111_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87111_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87114_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87114_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87170_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87170_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:14.08 +58:13:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87186_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87186_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87198_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87198_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:42.61 +56:25:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87216_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87216_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87217_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87217_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:32:53.18 +62:50:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87224_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87224_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:09:50.70 +59:50:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87235_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87235_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87254_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87254_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:28.23 +64:29:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87278_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87278_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:51.99 +60:58:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87294_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87294_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87295_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87295_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:39.64 +59:44:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87297_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87297_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87311_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87311_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87316_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87316_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87323_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87323_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:28.93 +59:02:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87324_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87324_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87326_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87326_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87341_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87341_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87344_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87344_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87352_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87352_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:39.80 +64:18:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87354_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87354_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:27.78 +65:27:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87365_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87365_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87373_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87373_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87390_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87390_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87404_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87404_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87423_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87423_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87442_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87442_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87459_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 87459_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16404_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
Preparing report for the candidate 16404_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34031_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
Preparing report for the candidate 34031_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36657_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
Preparing report for the candidate 36657_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45484_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 45484_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:34.33 +65:57:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81474_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220
The candidate 81474_fd_Dra-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_04-02-10_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0220 did not pass the final checks