fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 05.38017 | 2461349.88017 | 12.46 | 10:29:20.26 +16:02:48.4 | 3278 4506 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 05.38065 | 2461349.88065 | 12.40 | 10:29:20.30 +16:02:47.9 | 3277 4511 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits |
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 05.3804 2461349.8804 12.43 10:29:20.28 +16:02:48.1
224.13859 55.30049 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
196 Philomela -2 -1 2 12.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:29:20.28 +16:02:48.1: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:29:20.28 +16:02:48.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 05.38017 | 2461349.88017 | 13.51 | 10:45:09.83 +13:13:12.8 | 5547 2750 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 05.38065 | 2461349.88065 | 13.55 | 10:45:09.81 +13:13:11.3 | 5545 2755 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits |
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 05.3804 2461349.8804 13.53 10:45:09.82 +13:13:12.1
231.85065 57.40153 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
351 Yrsa -2 -0 2 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:45:09.82 +13:13:12.1: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:45:09.82 +13:13:12.1: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 05.38017 | 2461349.88017 | 13.73 | 10:32:15.10 +12:45:52.8 | 3644 2511 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 05.38065 | 2461349.88065 | 13.86 | 10:32:15.18 +12:45:52.6 | 3643 2516 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits |
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 05.3804 2461349.8804 13.79 10:32:15.14 +12:45:52.7
229.78079 54.44235 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
487 Venetia -1 -1 1 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:32:15.14 +12:45:52.7: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:32:15.14 +12:45:52.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 05.38017 | 2461349.88017 | 13.78 | 10:36:17.22 +15:15:54.3 | 4275 4007 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 05.38065 | 2461349.88065 | 13.65 | 10:36:17.27 +15:15:53.5 | 4274 4011 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits |
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 05.3804 2461349.8804 13.71 10:36:17.24 +15:15:53.9
226.68200 56.47337 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
134 Sophrosyne -0 -1 1 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:36:17.24 +15:15:53.9: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:36:17.24 +15:15:53.9: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 05.38017 | 2461349.88017 | 14.37 | 10:29:48.80 +14:24:16.4 | 3316 3511 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 05.38065 | 2461349.88065 | 14.26 | 10:29:48.87 +14:24:16.6 | 3315 3516 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits |
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 05.3804 2461349.8804 14.31 10:29:48.84 +14:24:16.5
226.80329 54.68932 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
209 Dido -2 -0 2 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:29:48.84 +14:24:16.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:29:48.84 +14:24:16.5: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 05.38017 | 2461349.88017 | 14.44 | 10:24:30.38 +14:52:05.0 | 2548 3817 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 05.38065 | 2461349.88065 | 14.31 | 10:24:30.47 +14:52:06.4 | 2548 3822 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits |
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 05.3804 2461349.8804 14.38 10:24:30.43 +14:52:05.7
225.11834 53.74472 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
535 Montague -1 -1 1 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:24:30.43 +14:52:05.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:24:30.43 +14:52:05.7: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242 STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=local (lib/catalogs/local_star_catalog -> local copy: Gaia DR2 gaia_source, G < 19.0, built from https://cdn.gea.esac.esa.int/Gaia/gdr2/gaia_source/csv on 2026-11-04) The APASS known-star check of the candidates is disabled (see the note in util/transients/report_transient.sh) WARNING: VizieR is unreachable (no mirror answered the test query) - the online identification of candidates is degraded for this run INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Leo-05-Q2b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Leo-05-Q2b1x1 ########### Processing Leo-05-Q2b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 503774 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 503774 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits_preview.png'
Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
renamed 'Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits_preview.png'
Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. Field altitude during imaging: 15.2 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits Field altitude during imaging: 15.4 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 542.1009 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 438.8695 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1590.6019 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 464.4865 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1587.4615 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 463.4881 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.93414 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 8.15999984741211 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 9.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-05T03:07:16.5121006' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T09:07:16.5121006' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.3800522224 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T09:07:26.4126401' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.3801668053 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 159.997326593767 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9994663828685 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.2072222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 83.2858333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.76129916692501 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 40 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20663 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20663 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 8.15999984741211 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 8.15999984741211 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 89.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.11 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 9.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/d_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits :) Spent 0.504474 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/d_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 8.21000003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 9.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-05T03:07:58.5230988' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T09:07:58.5230988' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.3805384608 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T09:08:08.4243791' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.3806530554 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 159.997326549134 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9994664037262 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.3519444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 83.3783333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.72767565981416 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 40 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20663 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20663 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 8.21000003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 8.21000003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 89.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.11 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 9.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/d_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits :) Spent 0.482373 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/d_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits
fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461349.88016796 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits Image size: 941.1'x624.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:39:56.196 +13:56:19.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 Second-epoch image center 10:39:56.196 +13:56:19.61 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0667 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits Image size: 941.0'x624.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:39:56.634 +13:55:51.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 Second-epoch image center 10:39:56.634 +13:55:51.44 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0739 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:39:56.196 +13:56:19.61 Second-epoch second image center 10:39:56.634 +13:55:51.44 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00802 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wByzGaJNWZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q1TReOyI79 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ugk8aXfsL0 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CpgJgZvhaa Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2604 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2604 deg Loaded 4240 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3428 out of 3506 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3506 out of 5744 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.709950 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.709950 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2604 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7220 to 168.1826 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2604 deg Loaded 4240 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3428 out of 3506 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3506 out of 5744 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (aperture=6.3) Read 5709 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7036 to 168.1827 deg, Dec +8.6403 to +19.2435 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7036 to 168.1827 deg, Dec 8.6403 to 19.2435 deg Loaded 4243 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3432 out of 3504 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3504 out of 5709 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 2.4 pix Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 2.4 pix fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits 2.4 pix fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 15.4 mag. Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.wByzGaJNWZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=319, bad_region=1440, passed=5744 Got 5744 stars (including 4050 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5744 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3634 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3630 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3630 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3630 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4590 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3633 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4590 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4590 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 3629 stars left (next iteration limit 3993) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits N_match=3629 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=1157 n_q2=636 n_q3=1245 n_q4=591 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3629 N_valid=3629 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.013 bias_dec_arcsec=0.014 median_sep_arcsec=0.296 p95_sep_arcsec=0.964 n_q1=1157 n_q2=636 n_q3=1245 n_q4=591 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Q1TReOyI79 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=309, bad_region=1424, passed=5709 Got 5709 stars (including 4039 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5709 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3628 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3625 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3625 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3625 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4562 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3628 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3622 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4562 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3622 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4562 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 3622 stars left (next iteration limit 3987) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits N_match=3622 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.364 n_q1=1144 n_q2=651 n_q3=1241 n_q4=586 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.032 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3622 N_valid=3622 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.027 bias_dec_arcsec=0.008 median_sep_arcsec=0.298 p95_sep_arcsec=0.965 n_q1=1144 n_q2=651 n_q3=1241 n_q4=586 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.ugk8aXfsL0 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=202, bad_region=673, passed=3652 Got 3652 stars (including 2798 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3652 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 547 (Dec 8.5 to 19.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2406 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2399 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2399 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3102 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 547 (Dec 8.5 to 19.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2406 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2401 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3102 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2401 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3102 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 2401 stars left (next iteration limit 2638) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2401 robust_rms=6.731 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.103 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.103 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2401 robust_rms=0.508 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.692 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.576 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2401 robust_rms=0.411 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.533 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.475 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2401 robust_rms_before=1.668 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.377 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.411 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.500 worst_region_rms_after=0.533 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.663 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.475 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.500 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.500 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.377 arcsec matched=2401 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits N_match=2401 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.368 n_q1=790 n_q2=424 n_q3=761 n_q4=426 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2401 N_valid=2401 bias_ra_arcsec=0.432 bias_dec_arcsec=0.646 median_sep_arcsec=1.463 p95_sep_arcsec=3.344 n_q1=790 n_q2=424 n_q3=761 n_q4=426 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.CpgJgZvhaa (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=204, bad_region=677, passed=3661 Got 3661 stars (including 2805 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3661 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 547 (Dec 8.5 to 19.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2423 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2415 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2415 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2415 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3110 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 547 (Dec 8.5 to 19.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2423 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2416 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3110 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2416 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3110 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 2416 stars left (next iteration limit 2656) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2416 robust_rms=6.832 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.031 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.031 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2416 robust_rms=0.473 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.552 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.552 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2416 robust_rms=0.398 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.483 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.464 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2416 robust_rms_before=1.708 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.375 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.398 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.503 worst_region_rms_after=0.483 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.725 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.464 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.503 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.503 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.375 arcsec matched=2416 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits N_match=2416 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=794 n_q2=427 n_q3=758 n_q4=437 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2416 N_valid=2416 bias_ra_arcsec=0.507 bias_dec_arcsec=0.586 median_sep_arcsec=1.542 p95_sep_arcsec=3.267 n_q1=794 n_q2=427 n_q3=758 n_q4=437 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits sigma_overall=0.365 worst_q_ratio=1.077 ref2=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits sigma_overall=0.354 worst_q_ratio=1.032 new1=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits sigma_overall=0.384 worst_q_ratio=1.160 new2=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.114 reference average sigma_overall=0.3595 worst_q_ratio=1.0545 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141_astrometric_residuals.png (3629 matched stars from wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142_astrometric_residuals.png (3622 matched stars from wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488_astrometric_residuals.png (2401 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489_astrometric_residuals.png (2416 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits Image size: 941.1'x624.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:39:56.196 +13:56:19.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 Second-epoch image center 10:39:56.196 +13:56:19.61 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0667 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits Image size: 941.0'x624.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:39:56.634 +13:55:51.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:40:00.118 +14:00:12.76 Second-epoch image center 10:39:56.634 +13:55:51.44 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0739 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:39:56.196 +13:56:19.61 Second-epoch second image center 10:39:56.634 +13:55:51.44 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00802 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jGk6eRfsd2 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7vmPj3VBG8 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nq0lnkwKoc Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OIa1CzbZJJ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 29548 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2694 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2694 deg Loaded 4250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3390 out of 3597 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3597 out of 29548 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.581200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.581200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 29548 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec +8.6400 to +19.2694 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7119 to 168.2363 deg, Dec 8.6400 to 19.2694 deg Loaded 4250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3390 out of 3597 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3597 out of 29548 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (aperture=4.9) Read 29453 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.7036 to 168.1940 deg, Dec +8.6403 to +19.2611 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.7036 to 168.1940 deg, Dec 8.6403 to 19.2611 deg Loaded 4245 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3386 out of 3596 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3596 out of 29453 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (aperture=4.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 151 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 2.2 pix Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 2.3 pix fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits 2.3 pix fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 15.5 mag. Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.jGk6eRfsd2 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1176, bad_region=5538, passed=29533 Got 29533 stars (including 23167 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29533 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4505 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4499 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4499 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4499 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25250 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4506 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4496 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25250 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4496 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25241 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4496 stars left (next iteration limit 4948) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits N_match=4496 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=1458 n_q2=789 n_q3=1504 n_q4=745 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.053 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4496 N_valid=4496 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.031 bias_dec_arcsec=0.016 median_sep_arcsec=0.302 p95_sep_arcsec=0.933 n_q1=1458 n_q2=789 n_q3=1504 n_q4=745 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.7vmPj3VBG8 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1170, bad_region=5455, passed=29442 Got 29442 stars (including 23120 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29442 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4505 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4495 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4495 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4495 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25215 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4505 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4493 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25215 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4493 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25215 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4493 stars left (next iteration limit 4944) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits N_match=4493 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.367 n_q1=1453 n_q2=776 n_q3=1521 n_q4=743 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.030 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4493 N_valid=4493 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.045 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.305 p95_sep_arcsec=0.939 n_q1=1453 n_q2=776 n_q3=1521 n_q4=743 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.nq0lnkwKoc (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=623, bad_region=2603, passed=19640 Got 19640 stars (including 16534 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19640 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4211 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4199 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4199 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4199 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17657 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4211 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4202 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17657 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4202 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17657 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 4202 stars left (next iteration limit 4618) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4202 robust_rms=6.704 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.640 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.640 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4202 robust_rms=0.522 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.677 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.599 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4202 robust_rms=0.436 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.556 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.488 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4202 robust_rms_before=1.687 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.391 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.436 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.520 worst_region_rms_after=0.556 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.673 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.488 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.520 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.520 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.391 arcsec matched=4202 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits N_match=4202 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=1402 n_q2=684 n_q3=1355 n_q4=761 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4202 N_valid=4202 bias_ra_arcsec=0.431 bias_dec_arcsec=0.655 median_sep_arcsec=1.480 p95_sep_arcsec=3.230 n_q1=1402 n_q2=684 n_q3=1355 n_q4=761 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.OIa1CzbZJJ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=610, bad_region=2567, passed=19682 Got 19682 stars (including 16596 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19682 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4199 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4189 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4189 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4189 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17725 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4200 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4190 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17725 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4190 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17725 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 4190 stars left (next iteration limit 4607) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4190 robust_rms=6.759 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.597 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.597 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4190 robust_rms=0.502 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.613 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.584 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4190 robust_rms=0.426 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.527 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.509 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4190 robust_rms_before=1.729 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.401 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.426 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.502 worst_region_rms_after=0.527 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.728 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.509 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.502 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.502 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.401 arcsec matched=4190 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits N_match=4190 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=1375 n_q2=684 n_q3=1356 n_q4=775 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4190 N_valid=4190 bias_ra_arcsec=0.520 bias_dec_arcsec=0.598 median_sep_arcsec=1.558 p95_sep_arcsec=3.192 n_q1=1375 n_q2=684 n_q3=1356 n_q4=775 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:31:01.78 +17:50:08.0: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:29:20.28 +16:02:48.1: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:29:20.28 +16:02:48.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:31:01.78 +17:50:08.0: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:31:01.78 +17:50:08.0: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3208 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:45:09.82 +13:13:12.1: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:32:15.14 +12:45:52.7: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:36:17.24 +15:15:53.9: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:45:09.82 +13:13:12.1: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:32:15.14 +12:45:52.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:36:17.24 +15:15:53.9: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:29:48.84 +14:24:16.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-23-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0141.fits at 10:24:30.43 +14:52:05.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:24:30.43 +14:52:05.7: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-24-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0142.fits at 10:29:48.84 +14:24:16.5: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33055.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35178.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35332.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35576.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36775.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36777.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31745_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 31745_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.88 10:38:02.50 +15:16:43.1 4529 4014 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31747_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 31747_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.38017 2461349.88017 12.42 10:31:01.74 +17:50:07.9 3555 5583 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0488.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.25 10:31:01.81 +17:50:08.2 3554 5588 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32095_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 32095_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 10.38 10:57:14.34 +11:51:58.1 7319 1924 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32151_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 32151_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 10.57 10:55:54.06 +11:14:31.0 7119 1546 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32253_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 32253_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 11.14 10:33:41.55 +13:57:52.3 3875 3235 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32267_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 32267_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 11.16 10:30:02.41 +13:25:28.1 3330 2923 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32583_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 32583_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 11.87 10:25:39.31 +17:47:24.7 2777 5588 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32742_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 32742_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 11.90 10:54:36.77 +17:33:39.4 6950 5374 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32760_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 32760_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 11.95 10:34:51.97 +12:15:50.6 4020 2204 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32864_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 32864_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 11.80 10:54:42.55 +10:18:38.1 6939 0981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32904_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 32904_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.24 10:35:02.01 +17:59:07.1 4133 5663 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32942_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 32942_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.05 10:54:39.09 +13:32:47.7 6941 2942 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32997_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 32997_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.34 10:37:20.72 +17:52:59.0 4464 5593 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33003_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33003_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.30 10:22:05.82 +10:00:04.8 2076 0882 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33055_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 Preparing report for the candidate 33055_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33056_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33056_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.16 10:52:07.27 +10:04:27.5 6552 0840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33110_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33110_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.59 10:23:42.87 +14:56:44.7 2433 3873 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33172_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33172_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.59 10:31:41.27 +18:01:26.6 3652 5700 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33196_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33196_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.36 10:33:43.88 +13:18:55.6 3870 2843 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33205_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33205_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.54 10:23:23.93 +11:52:28.8 2316 2015 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33270_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33270_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.40 10:36:10.89 +11:08:37.3 4197 1522 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33279_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33279_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.63 10:22:06.42 +16:49:53.9 2241 5026 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33342_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33342_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.46 10:50:06.43 +14:56:37.4 6282 3789 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33366_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33366_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.59 10:43:40.14 +16:56:12.3 5364 5003 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33381_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33381_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.80 10:34:40.42 +17:31:08.1 4074 5381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33395_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33395_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.46 10:30:27.86 +10:06:36.0 3330 0914 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33396_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33396_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.37 10:50:56.69 +13:40:19.6 6397 3020 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33414_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33414_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.56 10:29:18.35 +09:44:47.0 3150 0697 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33476_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33476_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.76 10:28:23.90 +15:59:59.1 3139 4487 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33487_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33487_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.55 10:57:25.56 +16:24:16.3 7355 4673 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33501_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33501_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.50 10:49:37.35 +13:40:06.0 6203 3019 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33535_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33535_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.76 10:43:51.11 +14:12:31.7 5363 3354 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33541_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33541_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.65 10:48:58.23 +15:38:07.0 6121 4208 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33550_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33550_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.63 10:51:27.19 +14:29:55.1 6476 3519 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33596_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33596_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.83 10:32:39.82 +14:24:24.6 3732 3506 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33702_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33702_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.88 10:38:58.59 +16:35:41.7 4682 4807 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33714_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33714_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.99 10:26:50.33 +14:23:01.5 2879 3517 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33724_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33724_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.71 10:49:02.93 +17:50:22.4 6148 5544 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33736_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33736_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.62 10:53:33.85 +16:23:01.7 6793 4659 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33737_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33737_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.64 10:57:44.96 +14:03:49.6 7398 3255 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33868_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33868_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.19 10:22:30.65 +16:31:58.1 2293 4842 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33887_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33887_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.70 10:51:37.32 +12:04:25.1 6488 2053 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33900_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33900_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.83 10:40:24.02 +13:23:25.9 4849 2868 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33968_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 33968_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.95 10:46:19.20 +10:57:35.2 5696 1386 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34047_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34047_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.06 10:22:30.58 +11:43:15.0 2180 1926 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34058_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34058_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.86 10:54:22.72 +13:00:26.8 6899 2616 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34061_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34061_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.33 10:40:58.52 +16:35:37.4 4971 4801 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34160_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34160_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.14 10:44:26.51 +16:21:45.3 5470 4654 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34166_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34166_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.74 10:58:16.32 +12:24:21.2 7473 2251 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34181_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34181_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.23 10:25:54.43 +12:49:25.6 2709 2578 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34188_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34188_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.54 10:21:43.62 +16:04:37.0 2168 4570 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34243_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34243_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.22 10:26:27.78 +13:23:53.7 2803 2923 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34260_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34260_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 12.95 10:56:59.63 +13:06:57.1 7285 2681 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34305_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34305_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.08 10:50:15.13 +15:05:04.3 6304 3874 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34309_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34309_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.24 10:26:04.52 +17:30:35.0 2832 5415 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34366_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34366_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.20 10:29:32.68 +10:52:52.9 3208 1386 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34375_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34375_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.42 10:24:35.47 +13:18:13.9 2525 2875 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34386_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34386_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.24 10:28:26.24 +10:48:59.2 3042 1351 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34550_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34550_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.66 10:30:37.03 +12:57:06.0 3406 2635 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34642_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34642_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.40 10:26:58.06 +14:29:14.2 2900 3579 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34656_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34656_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.21 10:47:56.60 +10:29:04.4 5933 1095 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34686_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34686_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.73 10:23:37.62 +10:21:26.1 2314 1092 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34723_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34723_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.59 10:32:15.73 +17:19:48.7 3723 5276 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34767_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34767_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.28 10:40:34.44 +16:50:40.9 4916 4954 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34839_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34839_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.55 10:22:55.82 +10:21:31.2 2210 1096 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34854_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34854_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.29 10:47:16.30 +16:52:41.0 5884 4962 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34875_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34875_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.46 10:34:08.07 +11:49:29.9 3905 1941 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34884_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34884_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.16 10:57:02.39 +09:51:59.7 7286 0709 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34908_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34908_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.62 10:47:39.19 +11:16:13.9 5896 1572 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34917_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34917_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.37 10:29:05.54 +12:12:19.7 3167 2190 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34919_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34919_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.57 10:36:46.68 +17:38:34.9 4379 5449 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34948_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34948_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.33 10:53:14.72 +14:39:43.9 6739 3617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 34961_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 34961_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.51 10:47:04.89 +18:00:39.7 5866 5650 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35012_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35012_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.72 10:32:10.90 +16:57:07.7 3705 5047 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35046_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35046_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.52 10:37:21.60 +14:55:44.9 4425 3805 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35052_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35052_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.68 10:33:43.43 +17:12:11.4 3932 5193 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35058_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35058_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.55 10:26:01.89 +11:27:57.3 2698 1755 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35069_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35069_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.53 10:37:18.00 +16:59:10.9 4445 5049 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35086_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35086_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.49 10:39:41.03 +14:49:26.7 4762 3735 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35093_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35093_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.49 10:39:24.10 +15:17:54.0 4727 4022 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35095_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35095_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.72 10:50:00.58 +12:25:05.0 6252 2263 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35131_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35131_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.35 10:39:19.95 +12:02:05.0 4675 2052 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35173_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35173_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.83 10:27:11.10 +14:00:10.3 2922 3285 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35178_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 Preparing report for the candidate 35178_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35232_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35232_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.73 10:24:37.73 +10:16:20.8 2462 1036 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35244_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35244_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.52 10:43:17.13 +16:23:55.8 5303 4678 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35272_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35272_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.67 10:45:23.62 +17:21:07.8 5617 5252 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35275_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35275_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.70 10:38:08.69 +10:39:53.0 4481 1226 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35306_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35306_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.64 10:22:39.43 +11:10:49.1 2189 1597 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35332_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 Preparing report for the candidate 35332_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35365_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35365_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.65 10:56:09.78 +16:23:57.3 7171 4669 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35374_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35374_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.55 10:34:09.29 +09:52:32.3 3876 0759 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35414_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35414_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.59 10:40:19.02 +13:44:11.5 4841 3077 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35472_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35472_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.66 10:35:00.09 +17:46:04.4 4125 5531 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35475_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35475_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.19 10:56:30.37 +09:44:40.7 7206 0635 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35477_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35477_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.54 10:38:40.76 +13:29:14.4 4598 2931 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35479_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35479_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.82 10:29:27.05 +09:54:53.5 3175 0799 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35552_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35552_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.07 10:35:21.59 +13:03:17.6 4105 2680 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35576_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 Preparing report for the candidate 35576_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35615_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35615_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.74 10:42:18.77 +16:44:32.5 5166 4888 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35640_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35640_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.73 10:26:50.60 +10:13:30.7 2792 0998 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35676_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35676_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.86 10:32:12.12 +10:00:00.0 3587 0841 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35677_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35677_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.39 10:22:37.18 +16:42:55.0 2313 4952 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35705_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35705_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.75 10:57:59.68 +09:58:03.4 7429 0770 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35715_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35715_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.94 10:36:54.08 +18:09:13.4 4404 5759 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35761_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35761_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.77 10:49:14.15 +14:22:46.6 6151 3449 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35854_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35854_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.62 10:35:00.44 +12:47:04.5 4049 2518 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35872_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35872_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.53 10:54:01.30 +12:55:28.4 6846 2566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35909_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35909_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.03 10:36:38.96 +17:57:30.0 4365 5641 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35915_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35915_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.84 10:43:09.37 +10:45:16.5 5225 1268 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35925_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35925_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.53 10:38:56.39 +11:25:16.5 4609 1682 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35954_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35954_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.76 10:46:45.05 +17:29:42.8 5814 5337 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35967_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35967_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.72 10:47:25.38 +10:23:09.4 5855 1036 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 35980_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 35980_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.10 10:46:01.16 +14:35:34.3 5683 3582 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36012_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36012_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.07 10:23:17.72 +14:24:00.9 2359 3545 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36026_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36026_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.99 10:51:05.64 +13:41:55.9 6419 3036 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36067_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36067_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.54 10:54:51.53 +10:52:54.5 6963 1328 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36150_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36150_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.02 10:43:51.04 +12:19:55.5 5344 2221 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36156_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36156_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.79 10:44:08.45 +11:03:06.6 5374 1446 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36189_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36189_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.79 10:46:06.63 +14:12:19.8 5693 3348 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36195_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36195_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.91 10:57:37.60 +14:05:37.0 7380 3273 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36217_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36217_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.28 10:24:04.02 +16:13:47.2 2513 4649 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36246_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36246_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.67 10:35:22.73 +10:56:35.3 4075 1403 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36276_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36276_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.08 10:30:19.50 +17:48:59.6 3452 5580 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36279_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36279_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.22 10:41:14.92 +14:13:27.1 4983 3369 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36314_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36314_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.37 10:32:03.12 +17:31:34.9 3696 5396 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36447_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36447_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.73 10:51:43.59 +11:23:18.7 6500 1638 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36457_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36457_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.06 10:23:08.85 +10:50:30.6 2254 1389 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36470_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36470_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.18 10:45:28.36 +09:48:02.4 5560 0684 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36569_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36569_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.37 10:34:57.27 +14:45:38.5 4072 3711 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36633_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36633_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.51 10:25:59.28 +17:38:25.4 2822 5495 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36729_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36729_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.28 10:35:00.93 +16:23:26.4 4106 4696 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36740_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36740_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.85 10:52:01.08 +13:35:26.6 6554 2970 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36775_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 Preparing report for the candidate 36775_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36777_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 Preparing report for the candidate 36777_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36780_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36780_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.62 10:35:26.90 +13:14:56.9 4121 2797 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36817_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36817_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.40 10:37:12.66 +16:49:50.7 4430 4955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36827_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36827_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.06 10:57:52.53 +13:45:58.7 7416 3075 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36873_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36873_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 13.89 10:49:37.56 +14:31:27.2 6209 3536 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36875_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36875_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.43 10:33:43.96 +17:33:44.7 3939 5411 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36881_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36881_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.03 10:53:01.93 +13:07:49.2 6701 2691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36888_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36888_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.01 10:44:50.17 +10:24:57.2 5471 1059 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36903_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36903_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.05 10:57:38.61 +14:56:39.2 7384 3788 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36911_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36911_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.40 10:39:14.76 +13:38:02.7 4683 3018 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36919_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36919_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.63 10:29:23.19 +15:44:58.7 3278 4331 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36933_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36933_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.18 10:55:11.70 +10:28:19.4 7012 1079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36953_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36953_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.43 10:36:13.37 +11:39:32.5 4211 1834 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36992_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36992_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.61 10:30:43.79 +12:06:30.8 3407 2125 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 36993_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 36993_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.48 10:39:51.41 +13:45:58.7 4774 3096 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 37016_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 37016_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 14.57 10:51:59.69 +15:37:38.2 6561 4201 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 15259_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 The candidate 15259_fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.38065 2461349.88065 10.74 10:53:37.26 +13:42:53.0 6790 3044 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_030828_TTUQ2b1x1_2265115_XbjZhUdu/fd_Leo-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_03-07-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0489.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 10:53:37.22 +13:42:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 10:29:20.28 +16:02:48.1 10:45:09.82 +13:13:12.1 10:32:15.14 +12:45:52.7 10:36:17.24 +15:15:53.9 10:29:48.84 +14:24:16.5 10:24:30.43 +14:52:05.7 ########### Completed Leo-05-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 10:29:20.28 +16:02:48.1 10:45:09.82 +13:13:12.1 10:32:15.14 +12:45:52.7 10:36:17.24 +15:15:53.9 10:29:48.84 +14:24:16.5 10:24:30.43 +14:52:05.7 ################################################################################### 10:29:20.28 +16:02:48.1 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 10:45:09.82 +13:13:12.1 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 10:32:15.14 +12:45:52.7 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 10:36:17.24 +15:15:53.9 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 10:29:48.84 +14:24:16.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 10:24:30.43 +14:52:05.7 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.88016796 -observatory V36 14:33:21.07 -15:09:37.1 Mercury (6.1mag) 13:23:13.07 -12:49:34.7 Venus (-4.5mag) 09:33:30.97 +16:17:05.8 Mars (0.8mag) 09:47:59.14 +14:01:59.5 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:35:58.51 +00:58:06.1 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:08:42.76 +20:49:18.2 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:08:11.22 -00:39:10.6 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:32.91 -23:41:12.5 Pluto (14.5mag) 11:46:42.84 -01:28:57.2 Moon (-9.2mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Nov 5 03:09 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.88016796: 09:47:53.10 +14:02:34.7 Io (6.0mag) 09:48:09.71 +14:00:58.6 Europa (6.1mag) 09:47:45.71 +14:03:18.3 Ganymede (5.5mag) 09:48:27.20 +13:59:20.9 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:49:34.53 +14:10:09.0 Himalia (15.5mag) 09:47:56.05 +14:02:17.3 Thebe (16.3mag) 09:47:52.08 +14:27:05.1 Elara (17.4mag) 09:48:34.75 +13:30:25.7 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 09:44:53.02 +14:34:12.4 Carme (18.7mag) 00:36:10.61 +00:57:51.8 Titan (8.3mag) 00:35:53.91 +00:57:56.0 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:36:31.63 +00:59:08.6 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:35:55.20 +00:57:34.8 Hyperion (14.2mag) 00:34:11.80 +00:46:01.2 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Nov 5 03:09 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.88016796: 04:40:59.39 +16:50:53.5 JWST 19:48:28.99 -16:22:30.4 Chandra 07:07:42.91 -11:24:29.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Nov 5 03:09 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.88016796 -observatory V36 03:32:09.87 +19:53:53.4 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:47:13.14 +38:31:41.4 17.8mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill) 07:47:18.53 +38:31:28.5 17.8mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 07:46:36.71 +38:31:49.1 17.8mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill) 05:01:20.74 +38:45:40.3 17.7mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski) 18:50:18.26 -32:48:59.0 15.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:45:23.09 -74:01:49.3 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:10:56.80 +35:21:44.1 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 21:43:01.78 +20:28:38.6 17.9mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:35:51.25 +25:20:24.9 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:08:41.94 +38:48:57.4 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:38:20.84 +40:51:26.6 17.5mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:42:22.66 -13:30:38.1 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 14:17:26.57 -04:44:22.7 16.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 20:22:06.20 +51:46:55.5 15.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 13:09:25.86 +17:15:56.2 17.7mag A/2026 E1 15:55:46.85 -66:33:52.5 14.7mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 19:36:00.85 -05:23:41.6 17.1mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS) 10:47:03.42 +02:35:52.8 17.5mag P/2026 U1 (Gafton) 23:24:24.08 +13:32:37.5 16.9mag 2P/Encke 23:28:37.40 -25:13:06.9 15.5mag 10P/Tempel 02:42:17.84 +29:30:34.7 16.5mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:27:22.43 -10:11:38.6 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:10:01.41 -08:59:04.8 15.9mag 65P/Gunn 08:01:39.68 +13:23:31.7 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 20:56:52.19 -24:18:58.2 16.5mag 84P/Giclas 10:41:57.39 +13:11:42.6 17.6mag 93P/Lovas 09:06:12.73 +46:22:07.9 16.8mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:54:47.10 +04:50:47.6 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 12:30:40.39 +07:36:38.9 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 23:26:13.40 -00:57:20.4 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 19:44:38.46 +14:54:48.0 10.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 11:16:12.26 -03:27:03.0 16.3mag 169P/NEAT 09:42:22.31 +23:24:34.5 18.0mag 186P/Garradd 03:08:48.86 +02:03:17.9 15.4mag 220P/McNaught 06:22:40.46 +50:06:03.0 15.9mag 260P/McNaught 07:58:26.92 +25:02:30.7 17.5mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Nov 5 03:09 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:58:35.28 +22:20:06.50 ASASSN-26fs 2026-11-2.4 12.31 02:29:41.13 -71:57:55.60 ASASSN-26fr 2026-11-1.22 13.7 21:27:22.43 -18:15:42.10 SN 2026agsu 2026-10-29.85 -1.08 17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92 10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27 21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82 01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9 01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88 00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77 22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42 01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3 18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Nov 5 03:09 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag 05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag 05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Nov 5 03:09 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 22:29:52.275 +18:34:19.42 AT 2026afzp 2026-10-14.36 20.48 02:39:11.125 +17:41:15.14 AT 2026afzo 2026-10-14.38 21.95 02:27:41.006 +23:04:08.87 AT 2026afzn 2026-10-14.38 20.75 23:41:28.246 +15:22:55.44 AT 2026afzm 2026-10-14.42 20.55 05:57:09.596 -21:44:23.09 AT 2026afzl 2026-10-17.60 20.86 06:39:03.694 -23:31:00.11 AT 2026afzk 2026-10-17.61 20.62 00:27:26.818 +29:16:40.85 AT 2026afzj 2026-10-19.27 20.83 18:22:09.520 +25:34:07.56 AT 2026afzi 2026-10-19.22 20.74 22:54:46.804 +38:52:38.17 AT 2026afzh 2026-10-19.25 20.81 22:15:16.031 +35:30:23.42 AT 2026afzg 2026-10-19.24 20.32 01:33:58.403 +22:17:36.22 AT 2026afzf 2026-10-19.32 21.11 00:11:26.192 +27:26:48.54 AT 2026afze 2026-10-19.28 20.29 02:50:45.989 +30:17:57.81 AT 2026afzd 2026-10-19.37 20.98 04:03:41.821 +30:40:43.11 AT 2026afzc 2026-10-19.46 21.47 02:58:55.564 -03:52:08.16 AT 2026afzb 2026-10-19.49 20.93 01:55:10.544 +04:10:57.79 AT 2026afza 2026-10-19.41 20.67 01:01:52.348 +00:04:56.03 AT 2026afyz 2026-10-20.38 21.03 03:32:22.207 +22:40:19.08 AT 2026afyy 2026-10-19.41 20.9 03:38:00.600 -06:45:14.10 AT 2026afyx 2026-10-19.49 21.27 01:28:24.132 +05:07:56.12 AT 2026afyw 2026-10-19.40 20.4 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Nov 5 03:09 tns_transients_list.txt
JD 2461171.68284: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461171.68348: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88017: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.88065: SE_FLAGS=0.
