util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242 STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=local (lib/catalogs/local_star_catalog -> local copy: Gaia DR2 gaia_source, G < 19.0, built from https://cdn.gea.esac.esa.int/Gaia/gdr2/gaia_source/csv on 2026-11-04) The APASS known-star check of the candidates is disabled (see the note in util/transients/report_transient.sh) WARNING: VizieR is unreachable (no mirror answered the test query) - the online identification of candidates is degraded for this run INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: UMa-10-Q2b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting UMa-10-Q2b1x1 ########### Processing UMa-10-Q2b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 531310 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 531310 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits_preview.png'
UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
renamed 'UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits_preview.png'
UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. Field altitude during imaging: 14.9 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits Field altitude during imaging: 15.0 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 431.5825 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 529.1146 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1521.1166 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 475.8685 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1517.0963 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 476.4736 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.52451 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 10.1300001144409 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 10.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-05T01:42:17.5058692' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T07:42:17.5058692' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.3210359374 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T07:42:27.4092379' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.3211505669 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 161.999555702679 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9998695555838 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.9055555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 44.3394444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.83342105763876 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 48 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20682 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20682 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 10.1300001144409 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 10.1300001144409 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 84.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.11 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 10.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 19.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/d_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits :) Spent 0.516002 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/d_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 10.1300001144409 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 10.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-05T01:43:01.2939113' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T07:43:01.2939113' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.3215427431 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T07:43:11.1981552' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.3216573843 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 161.999555641871 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9998695863252 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.0125 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 44.4125 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.8075315194995 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 48 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20682 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20682 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 10.1300001144409 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 10.1300001144409 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 84.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.11 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 10.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 19.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/d_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits :) Spent 0.509023 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/d_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits
fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461349.82115168 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits Image size: 941.2'x624.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:22.768 +46:01:28.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34 Second-epoch image center 10:48:22.768 +46:01:28.69 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0664 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits Image size: 941.2'x624.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:23.202 +46:00:57.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34 Second-epoch image center 10:48:23.202 +46:00:57.86 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0651 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:48:22.768 +46:01:28.69 Second-epoch second image center 10:48:23.202 +46:00:57.86 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00865 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RZ66RCyI7H Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BwTtJckJtw Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZBrkOREdAs Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v1PpV0oEAp Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2888 to 173.9091 deg, Dec +39.8237 to +51.3878 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2888 to 173.9091 deg, Dec 39.8237 to 51.3878 deg Loaded 4562 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3121 out of 3300 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3300 out of 6977 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.924200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.924200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.72
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2888 to 173.9091 deg, Dec +39.8237 to +51.3878 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2888 to 173.9091 deg, Dec 39.8237 to 51.3878 deg Loaded 4562 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3121 out of 3300 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3300 out of 6977 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (aperture=6.4) Read 6367 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.7463 to 174.3149 deg, Dec +40.3417 to +51.2581 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.7463 to 174.3149 deg, Dec 40.3417 to 51.2581 deg Loaded 4272 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3192 out of 3282 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3282 out of 6367 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 2.4 pix UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 15.6 mag. UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 14.7 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits 14.7 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.RZ66RCyI7H (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=476, bad_region=1600, passed=6977 Got 6977 stars (including 5031 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4824 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5701 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5701 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5701 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4824 stars left (next iteration limit 5306) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits N_match=4824 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=1486 n_q2=875 n_q3=1621 n_q4=842 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4824 N_valid=4824 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.000 median_sep_arcsec=0.321 p95_sep_arcsec=0.823 n_q1=1486 n_q2=875 n_q3=1621 n_q4=842 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.BwTtJckJtw (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=355, bad_region=1639, passed=6367 Got 6367 stars (including 4435 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6367 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4292 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4289 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4289 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4289 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5041 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4291 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4288 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5041 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4288 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5041 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4288 stars left (next iteration limit 4717) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits N_match=4288 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.379 n_q1=1338 n_q2=864 n_q3=1337 n_q4=749 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4288 N_valid=4288 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.039 bias_dec_arcsec=0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.311 p95_sep_arcsec=0.900 n_q1=1338 n_q2=864 n_q3=1337 n_q4=749 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.ZBrkOREdAs (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=192, bad_region=695, passed=3546 Got 3546 stars (including 2688 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3546 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2622 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2621 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2621 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2621 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2982 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2623 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2621 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2982 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2621 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2982 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 2621 stars left (next iteration limit 2883) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2621 robust_rms=6.812 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.227 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.227 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2621 robust_rms=0.678 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.378 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.590 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2621 robust_rms=0.433 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.813 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.482 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2621 robust_rms_before=1.758 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.349 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.433 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.427 worst_region_rms_after=0.813 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.510 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.482 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.427 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.427 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.349 arcsec matched=2621 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits N_match=2621 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=850 n_q2=450 n_q3=906 n_q4=415 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.038 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2621 N_valid=2621 bias_ra_arcsec=0.807 bias_dec_arcsec=0.404 median_sep_arcsec=1.573 p95_sep_arcsec=3.014 n_q1=850 n_q2=450 n_q3=906 n_q4=415 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.v1PpV0oEAp (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=193, bad_region=703, passed=3593 Got 3593 stars (including 2725 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3593 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2659 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2658 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2658 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2658 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3022 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2660 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2658 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3022 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2658 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3022 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 2658 stars left (next iteration limit 2923) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2658 robust_rms=6.639 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.033 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.033 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2658 robust_rms=0.558 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.590 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.552 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2658 robust_rms=0.382 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.473 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.403 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2658 robust_rms_before=1.562 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.339 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.382 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.409 worst_region_rms_after=0.473 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.403 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.403 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.409 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.409 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.339 arcsec matched=2658 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits N_match=2658 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=879 n_q2=446 n_q3=912 n_q4=421 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.048 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2658 N_valid=2658 bias_ra_arcsec=0.644 bias_dec_arcsec=0.409 median_sep_arcsec=1.368 p95_sep_arcsec=2.871 n_q1=879 n_q2=446 n_q3=912 n_q4=421 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits sigma_overall=0.388 worst_q_ratio=1.125 ref2=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits sigma_overall=0.374 worst_q_ratio=1.083 new1=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits sigma_overall=0.354 worst_q_ratio=1.038 new2=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.048 reference average sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.104 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300_astrometric_residuals.png (4824 matched stars from wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183_astrometric_residuals.png (4288 matched stars from wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422_astrometric_residuals.png (2621 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423_astrometric_residuals.png (2658 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits Image size: 941.2'x624.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:22.768 +46:01:28.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34 Second-epoch image center 10:48:22.768 +46:01:28.69 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0664 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits Image size: 941.2'x624.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:23.202 +46:00:57.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:48:01.277 +46:00:05.34 Second-epoch image center 10:48:23.202 +46:00:57.86 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0651 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:48:22.768 +46:01:28.69 Second-epoch second image center 10:48:23.202 +46:00:57.86 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00865 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LW2PFWJZBI Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fe665P7HPF Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w817eHwEdk Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6NhSeapMGZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 34182 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2608 to 173.9091 deg, Dec +39.8237 to +51.4075 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2608 to 173.9091 deg, Dec 39.8237 to 51.4075 deg Loaded 4576 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2959 out of 3310 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3310 out of 34182 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.810500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.810500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.91 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.90 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.90
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 34182 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2608 to 173.9091 deg, Dec +39.8237 to +51.4075 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2608 to 173.9091 deg, Dec 39.8237 to 51.4075 deg Loaded 4576 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2959 out of 3310 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3310 out of 34182 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (aperture=5.0) Read 30481 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.6960 to 174.3149 deg, Dec +40.3147 to +51.2657 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.6960 to 174.3149 deg, Dec 40.3147 to 51.2657 deg Loaded 4300 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3058 out of 3292 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3292 out of 30481 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits (aperture=5.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 38 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 2.2 pix UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.9 mag. UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 15.8 mag. UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 14.8 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits 14.9 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.LW2PFWJZBI (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1513, bad_region=6370, passed=34166 Got 34166 stars (including 26567 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34166 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4826 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29176 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29176 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29176 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4826 stars left (next iteration limit 5308) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits N_match=4826 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=1477 n_q2=852 n_q3=1645 n_q4=852 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4826 N_valid=4826 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.000 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.308 p95_sep_arcsec=0.778 n_q1=1477 n_q2=852 n_q3=1645 n_q4=852 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.fe665P7HPF (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1294, bad_region=5941, passed=30466 Got 30466 stars (including 23568 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30466 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4811 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4809 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4808 stars left (next iteration limit 5289) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits N_match=4808 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=1523 n_q2=964 n_q3=1455 n_q4=866 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4808 N_valid=4808 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.048 bias_dec_arcsec=0.014 median_sep_arcsec=0.312 p95_sep_arcsec=0.879 n_q1=1523 n_q2=964 n_q3=1455 n_q4=866 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.w817eHwEdk (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=544, bad_region=2722, passed=19107 Got 19107 stars (including 15908 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19107 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4736 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4732 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4732 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4732 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17065 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4738 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4732 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17065 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4732 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17065 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4732 stars left (next iteration limit 5205) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4732 robust_rms=6.718 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.425 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.425 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4732 robust_rms=0.698 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.356 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.700 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4732 robust_rms=0.468 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.834 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.509 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4732 robust_rms_before=1.777 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.376 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.468 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.489 worst_region_rms_after=0.834 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.550 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.509 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.489 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.489 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.376 arcsec matched=4732 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits N_match=4732 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.350 n_q1=1526 n_q2=771 n_q3=1643 n_q4=792 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.037 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4732 N_valid=4732 bias_ra_arcsec=0.796 bias_dec_arcsec=0.438 median_sep_arcsec=1.595 p95_sep_arcsec=2.995 n_q1=1526 n_q2=771 n_q3=1643 n_q4=792 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.6NhSeapMGZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=540, bad_region=2783, passed=19215 Got 19215 stars (including 15961 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19215 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4737 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4732 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4732 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4732 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17146 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4740 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4733 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17146 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4733 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17146 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4733 stars left (next iteration limit 5205) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4733 robust_rms=6.551 arcsec worst_region_rms=8.955 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=8.955 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4733 robust_rms=0.601 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.667 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.667 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4733 robust_rms=0.425 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.503 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.477 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4733 robust_rms_before=1.574 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.425 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.484 worst_region_rms_after=0.503 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.498 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.477 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.484 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.484 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.370 arcsec matched=4733 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits N_match=4733 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=1525 n_q2=767 n_q3=1651 n_q4=790 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.064 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4733 N_valid=4733 bias_ra_arcsec=0.672 bias_dec_arcsec=0.426 median_sep_arcsec=1.396 p95_sep_arcsec=2.854 n_q1=1525 n_q2=767 n_q3=1651 n_q4=790 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:20:33.95 +46:35:20.6: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:22:08.63 +41:31:50.5: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:09:56.47 +44:28:31.8: 10.62 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:16:31.95 +45:24:41.9: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:20:33.95 +46:35:20.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:33.95 +46:35:20.6: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0765 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:22:08.63 +41:31:50.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 11:09:56.47 +44:28:31.8: 10.63 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.63 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:22:08.63 +41:31:50.5: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5799 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:56.47 +44:28:31.8: ref_mag=10.63 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7523 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:16:31.95 +45:24:41.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:31.95 +45:24:41.9: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1880 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56753_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 56753_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 12.85 10:59:42.38 +50:10:38.5 5962 5702 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 10:59:42.53 +50:10:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56754_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 56754_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.32115 2461349.82115 13.24 10:20:34.05 +46:35:20.9 1917 3744 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 12.97 10:20:33.85 +46:35:20.3 1916 3749 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56767_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 56767_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.32115 2461349.82115 10.75 11:09:56.46 +44:28:31.9 7082 2275 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 10.76 11:09:56.48 +44:28:31.7 7081 2280 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56774_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 56774_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 10.97 10:15:11.27 +41:32:45.6 0940 0773 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56780_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 56780_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 11.29 10:12:02.54 +42:59:55.2 0711 1700 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56812_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 56812_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 12.11 10:23:01.97 +42:00:21.4 1865 0953 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56839_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 56839_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 12.35 10:24:57.01 +41:55:26.2 2076 0882 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56867_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 56867_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.32115 2461349.82115 12.59 10:22:08.63 +41:31:50.1 1732 0669 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 12.57 10:22:08.63 +41:31:50.9 1732 0674 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56871_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 56871_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 12.59 10:34:32.76 +41:45:49.7 3150 0697 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56877_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 56877_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 12.69 10:10:12.93 +44:12:58.8 0620 2464 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56923_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 56923_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 12.83 10:34:22.12 +41:58:55.8 3140 0831 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56939_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 56939_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 12.96 10:12:19.94 +42:28:03.5 0696 1374 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56946_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 56946_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.32115 2461349.82115 13.12 10:16:31.93 +45:24:41.5 1404 3087 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-42-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0422.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 13.28 10:16:31.96 +45:24:42.3 1403 3092 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56977_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 56977_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 13.33 10:17:09.41 +43:16:27.5 1302 1794 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56982_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 56982_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 13.47 10:18:54.83 +42:07:24.6 1409 1074 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56983_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 56983_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 13.23 10:27:52.75 +42:58:48.7 2468 1492 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 10:27:52.76 +42:58:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56998_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 56998_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 13.45 10:13:51.10 +42:28:47.2 0868 1359 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57005_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 57005_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 13.56 10:14:24.74 +41:35:19.9 0855 0810 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57021_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 57021_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 13.63 10:15:07.84 +43:05:04.6 1062 1707 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57026_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 57026_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 13.55 10:13:39.89 +45:00:45.7 1064 2892 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57043_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 57043_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 13.63 10:25:56.05 +42:17:37.5 2210 1096 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57064_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 57064_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 13.74 10:13:55.61 +43:34:50.0 0971 2024 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 10:13:55.59 +43:34:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57084_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 57084_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 13.96 10:13:53.54 +42:40:55.6 0890 1481 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57093_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 57093_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 13.76 10:16:55.51 +42:03:15.0 1179 1058 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57112_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 57112_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 13.88 10:22:32.81 +41:57:37.7 1807 0931 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57127_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 57127_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 13.78 10:56:05.59 +43:25:21.6 5585 1617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 10:56:05.71 +43:25:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57134_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 57134_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=1.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 13.74 10:54:31.85 +45:27:50.6 5428 2851 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 10:54:31.88 +45:27:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57141_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 57141_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 14.02 10:19:43.24 +43:15:17.4 1584 1749 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57157_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 57157_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 13.98 10:34:41.97 +41:56:00.9 3175 0799 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57160_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 57160_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 14.26 10:16:48.38 +41:18:54.0 1106 0610 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57202_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 57202_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 14.39 10:14:24.25 +44:31:04.9 1102 2583 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57208_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 57208_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 14.69 10:41:32.26 +44:19:38.0 4020 2204 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57217_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 57217_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 14.42 10:44:16.48 +44:41:00.1 4324 2406 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 10:44:16.46 +44:40:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57235_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 57235_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 14.44 10:55:54.79 +42:25:11.6 5561 1009 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 12397_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 12397_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 13.09 10:15:00.37 +44:02:41.2 1128 2289 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 12647_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 12647_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461093.78749: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 13.38 10:14:07.11 +44:04:48.1 1034 2323 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56512_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 56512_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461093.78749: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 13.73 11:08:33.73 +42:54:44.3 6963 1328 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 18841_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 The candidate 18841_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461171.71117: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.32166 2461349.82166 13.63 10:14:00.74 +45:57:31.9 1181 3457 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_020757_TTUQ2b1x1_3342128_gl30uOJt/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-43-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0423.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-10-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.82115168 -observatory V36 14:33:37.18 -15:12:11.4 Mercury (6.2mag) 13:23:15.95 -12:50:50.6 Venus (-4.5mag) 09:33:24.06 +16:17:34.1 Mars (0.8mag) 09:47:57.59 +14:02:06.5 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:35:59.30 +00:58:10.4 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:08:43.34 +20:49:19.6 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:08:11.48 -00:39:09.1 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:32.77 -23:41:13.2 Pluto (14.5mag) 11:43:34.60 -01:07:00.3 Moon (-9.2mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Nov 5 02:10 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.82115168: 09:47:51.15 +14:02:44.2 Io (6.0mag) 09:48:07.76 +14:01:07.7 Europa (6.1mag) 09:47:44.74 +14:03:22.0 Ganymede (5.5mag) 09:48:25.94 +13:59:26.3 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:49:32.75 +14:10:18.5 Himalia (15.5mag) 09:47:54.22 +14:02:25.7 Thebe (16.3mag) 09:47:50.34 +14:27:12.1 Elara (17.4mag) 09:48:33.51 +13:30:31.3 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 09:44:51.71 +14:34:19.0 Carme (18.7mag) 00:36:11.41 +00:57:55.6 Titan (8.3mag) 00:35:54.35 +00:58:01.1 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:36:32.34 +00:59:12.2 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:35:55.72 +00:57:39.3 Hyperion (14.2mag) 00:34:12.57 +00:46:05.4 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Nov 5 02:10 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.82115168: 04:41:07.60 +16:51:43.9 JWST 19:22:45.86 -06:38:45.1 Chandra 06:57:20.88 -03:20:21.3 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Nov 5 02:10 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.82115168 -observatory V36 03:32:12.68 +19:53:59.0 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:47:12.18 +38:31:25.4 17.8mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill) 07:47:17.57 +38:31:12.6 17.8mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 07:46:35.76 +38:31:33.1 17.8mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill) 05:01:22.01 +38:46:18.9 17.7mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski) 18:50:14.19 -32:49:05.8 15.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:45:23.03 -74:01:35.8 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:10:57.80 +35:21:38.3 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 21:43:02.42 +20:29:05.9 17.9mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:35:51.07 +25:20:24.5 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:08:41.81 +38:48:26.0 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:38:18.32 +40:51:28.0 17.5mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:42:23.99 -13:30:43.3 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 14:17:22.63 -04:44:06.3 16.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 20:21:53.01 +51:49:19.2 15.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 13:09:22.53 +17:15:25.5 17.7mag A/2026 E1 15:55:55.12 -66:31:58.1 14.7mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 19:35:57.28 -05:23:39.1 17.1mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS) 10:46:58.86 +02:36:23.7 17.5mag P/2026 U1 (Gafton) 23:24:32.09 +13:33:33.9 16.9mag 2P/Encke 23:28:32.83 -25:14:08.4 15.5mag 10P/Tempel 02:42:14.27 +29:32:33.5 16.5mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:27:20.24 -10:11:21.6 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:10:02.56 -08:59:09.5 15.9mag 65P/Gunn 08:01:37.21 +13:23:52.3 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 20:56:46.64 -24:19:21.2 16.5mag 84P/Giclas 10:41:53.23 +13:12:12.8 17.6mag 93P/Lovas 09:06:01.45 +46:21:21.2 16.8mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:54:40.64 +04:52:08.3 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 12:30:33.56 +07:37:25.6 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 23:26:13.72 -00:57:15.2 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 19:44:45.69 +14:53:56.1 10.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 11:16:05.07 -03:26:26.3 16.3mag 169P/NEAT 09:42:20.93 +23:24:43.6 18.0mag 186P/Garradd 03:08:52.41 +02:03:31.5 15.4mag 220P/McNaught 06:22:40.97 +50:05:26.8 15.9mag 260P/McNaught 07:58:23.53 +25:02:33.8 17.5mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Nov 5 02:10 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:58:35.28 +22:20:06.50 ASASSN-26fs 2026-11-2.4 12.31 02:29:41.13 -71:57:55.60 ASASSN-26fr 2026-11-1.22 13.7 21:27:22.43 -18:15:42.10 SN 2026agsu 2026-10-29.85 -1.08 17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92 10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27 21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82 01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9 01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88 00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77 22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42 01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3 18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Nov 5 02:10 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag 05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag 05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Nov 5 02:10 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 22:29:52.275 +18:34:19.42 AT 2026afzp 2026-10-14.36 20.48 02:39:11.125 +17:41:15.14 AT 2026afzo 2026-10-14.38 21.95 02:27:41.006 +23:04:08.87 AT 2026afzn 2026-10-14.38 20.75 23:41:28.246 +15:22:55.44 AT 2026afzm 2026-10-14.42 20.55 05:57:09.596 -21:44:23.09 AT 2026afzl 2026-10-17.60 20.86 06:39:03.694 -23:31:00.11 AT 2026afzk 2026-10-17.61 20.62 00:27:26.818 +29:16:40.85 AT 2026afzj 2026-10-19.27 20.83 18:22:09.520 +25:34:07.56 AT 2026afzi 2026-10-19.22 20.74 22:54:46.804 +38:52:38.17 AT 2026afzh 2026-10-19.25 20.81 22:15:16.031 +35:30:23.42 AT 2026afzg 2026-10-19.24 20.32 01:33:58.403 +22:17:36.22 AT 2026afzf 2026-10-19.32 21.11 00:11:26.192 +27:26:48.54 AT 2026afze 2026-10-19.28 20.29 02:50:45.989 +30:17:57.81 AT 2026afzd 2026-10-19.37 20.98 04:03:41.821 +30:40:43.11 AT 2026afzc 2026-10-19.46 21.47 02:58:55.564 -03:52:08.16 AT 2026afzb 2026-10-19.49 20.93 01:55:10.544 +04:10:57.79 AT 2026afza 2026-10-19.41 20.67 01:01:52.348 +00:04:56.03 AT 2026afyz 2026-10-20.38 21.03 03:32:22.207 +22:40:19.08 AT 2026afyy 2026-10-19.41 20.9 03:38:00.600 -06:45:14.10 AT 2026afyx 2026-10-19.49 21.27 01:28:24.132 +05:07:56.12 AT 2026afyw 2026-10-19.40 20.4 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Nov 5 02:10 tns_transients_list.txt
JD 2461093.78749: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82115: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.82166: SE_FLAGS=0.