######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242 STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=local (lib/catalogs/local_star_catalog -> local copy: Gaia DR2 gaia_source, G < 19.0, built from https://cdn.gea.esac.esa.int/Gaia/gdr2/gaia_source/csv on 2026-11-04) The APASS known-star check of the candidates is disabled (see the note in util/transients/report_transient.sh) WARNING: VizieR is unreachable (no mirror answered the test query) - the online identification of candidates is degraded for this run INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: UMa-07-Q2b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting UMa-07-Q2b1x1 ########### Processing UMa-07-Q2b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 529639 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 529639 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits_preview.png'
UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
renamed 'UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits_preview.png'
UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. Field altitude during imaging: 15.1 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits Field altitude during imaging: 15.3 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 446.9961 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 504.2603 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1504.2701 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 475.0277 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1498.2881 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 475.2495 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.36529 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 9.93000030517578 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 10.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-05T01:38:32.9608877' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T07:38:32.9608877' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.3184370371 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T07:38:42.8638088' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.3185516549 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 169.41068166993 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 53.9999246734318 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.1358333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 34.3819444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.77811486898862 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-07' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 17 39' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20682 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20682 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 9.93000030517578 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 9.93000030517578 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 83.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.21 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 10.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 26.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/d_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits :) Spent 0.519889 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/d_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 10.1599998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 10.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-05T01:39:35.5122210' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T07:39:35.5122210' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.3191610184 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T07:39:45.4161736' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.3192756483 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 169.410681579633 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 53.9999247233552 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.2577777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 34.4775 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.7494831450052 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-07' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 17 39' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20682 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20682 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 10.1599998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 10.1599998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 83.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.21 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 10.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 26.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/d_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits :) Spent 0.532359 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/d_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits
fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461349.81855278 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:17:41.843 +54:00:08.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits Image size: 940.7'x624.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:17:39.769 +54:00:28.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:17:41.843 +54:00:08.79 Second-epoch image center 11:17:39.769 +54:00:28.69 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0075 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits Image size: 940.7'x624.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:17:38.187 +54:00:54.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:17:41.843 +54:00:08.79 Second-epoch image center 11:17:38.187 +54:00:54.45 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0155 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:17:39.769 +54:00:28.69 Second-epoch second image center 11:17:38.187 +54:00:54.45 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00814 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7Idq3SaIrF Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tZ9RRv18Ks Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eS9ESxHAi0 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HgsbTUGZai Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6940 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 154.0154 to 183.7806 deg, Dec +47.6705 to +59.4175 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 154.0154 to 183.7806 deg, Dec 47.6705 to 59.4175 deg Loaded 5255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3490 out of 3670 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3670 out of 6940 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.919350 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.919350 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.70 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.70
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6940 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 154.0154 to 183.7806 deg, Dec +47.6705 to +59.4175 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 154.0154 to 183.7806 deg, Dec 47.6705 to 59.4175 deg Loaded 5255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3490 out of 3670 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3670 out of 6940 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits (aperture=6.4) Read 6962 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 154.0154 to 183.7805 deg, Dec +47.6704 to +59.4175 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 154.0154 to 183.7805 deg, Dec 47.6704 to 59.4175 deg Loaded 5255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3487 out of 3667 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3667 out of 6962 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits 2.3 pix UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 2.5 pix fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits 2.5 pix fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits 15.7 mag. UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 14.7 mag. fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits 14.7 mag. fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.7Idq3SaIrF (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=476, bad_region=1575, passed=6940 Got 6940 stars (including 5000 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6940 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4823 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5684 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5684 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5684 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 4823 stars left (next iteration limit 5305) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits N_match=4823 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.406 n_q1=1499 n_q2=840 n_q3=1571 n_q4=913 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4823 N_valid=4823 bias_ra_arcsec=0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.335 p95_sep_arcsec=0.809 n_q1=1499 n_q2=840 n_q3=1571 n_q4=913 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.tZ9RRv18Ks (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=475, bad_region=1575, passed=6962 Got 6962 stars (including 5017 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6962 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4826 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5695 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5695 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4825 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5695 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 4825 stars left (next iteration limit 5308) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits N_match=4825 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=1506 n_q2=831 n_q3=1589 n_q4=899 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4825 N_valid=4825 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.335 p95_sep_arcsec=0.824 n_q1=1506 n_q2=831 n_q3=1589 n_q4=899 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.eS9ESxHAi0 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=186, bad_region=679, passed=3621 Got 3621 stars (including 2783 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3621 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2716 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2713 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3060 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2716 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3060 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3060 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 2712 stars left (next iteration limit 2983) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2712 robust_rms=6.714 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.059 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.059 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2712 robust_rms=0.638 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.688 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.633 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2712 robust_rms=0.451 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.566 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.470 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2712 robust_rms_before=1.615 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.359 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.451 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.457 worst_region_rms_after=0.566 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.526 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.470 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.457 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.457 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.359 arcsec matched=2712 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits N_match=2712 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=891 n_q2=438 n_q3=931 n_q4=452 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.029 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2712 N_valid=2712 bias_ra_arcsec=0.705 bias_dec_arcsec=0.427 median_sep_arcsec=1.444 p95_sep_arcsec=2.827 n_q1=891 n_q2=438 n_q3=931 n_q4=452 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.HgsbTUGZai (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=195, bad_region=686, passed=3627 Got 3627 stars (including 2775 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3627 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2710 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2707 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3058 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 2710 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3058 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3058 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 2707 stars left (next iteration limit 2977) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2707 robust_rms=6.614 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.188 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.188 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2707 robust_rms=0.552 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.687 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.579 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2707 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.481 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.458 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2707 robust_rms_before=1.502 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.359 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.404 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.457 worst_region_rms_after=0.481 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.427 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.458 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.457 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.457 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.359 arcsec matched=2707 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits N_match=2707 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.376 n_q1=878 n_q2=442 n_q3=938 n_q4=449 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=2707 N_valid=2707 bias_ra_arcsec=0.709 bias_dec_arcsec=0.435 median_sep_arcsec=1.325 p95_sep_arcsec=2.690 n_q1=878 n_q2=442 n_q3=938 n_q4=449 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits sigma_overall=0.418 worst_q_ratio=1.135 ref2=UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits sigma_overall=0.424 worst_q_ratio=1.095 new1=fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits sigma_overall=0.360 worst_q_ratio=1.029 new2=fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.112 reference average sigma_overall=0.421 worst_q_ratio=1.115 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288_astrometric_residuals.png (4823 matched stars from wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289_astrometric_residuals.png (4825 matched stars from wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418_astrometric_residuals.png (2712 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419_astrometric_residuals.png (2707 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:17:41.843 +54:00:08.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits Image size: 940.7'x624.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:17:39.769 +54:00:28.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:17:41.843 +54:00:08.79 Second-epoch image center 11:17:39.769 +54:00:28.69 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0075 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits Image size: 940.7'x624.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 11:17:38.187 +54:00:54.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 11:17:41.843 +54:00:08.79 Second-epoch image center 11:17:38.187 +54:00:54.45 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0155 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 11:17:39.769 +54:00:28.69 Second-epoch second image center 11:17:38.187 +54:00:54.45 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00814 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rd8r1g8ARy Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A4yGgIwDef Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YeVtpUfara Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0EiG9o1MCd Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits and wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 34820 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 153.9032 to 183.8194 deg, Dec +47.5865 to +59.4409 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 153.9032 to 183.8194 deg, Dec 47.5865 to 59.4409 deg Loaded 5330 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3330 out of 3678 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3678 out of 34820 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.804950 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.804950 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.93 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.87 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.87
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 34820 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 153.9032 to 183.8194 deg, Dec +47.5865 to +59.4409 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 153.9032 to 183.8194 deg, Dec 47.5865 to 59.4409 deg Loaded 5330 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3330 out of 3678 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3678 out of 34820 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits (aperture=5.0) Read 34891 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 153.9031 to 183.7805 deg, Dec +47.5448 to +59.4321 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 153.9031 to 183.7805 deg, Dec 47.5448 to 59.4321 deg Loaded 5335 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3329 out of 3674 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3674 out of 34891 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (aperture=5.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 111 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits 2.1 pix UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.9 mag. UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits 15.9 mag. UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 14.8 mag. fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits 14.8 mag. fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.rd8r1g8ARy (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1580, bad_region=6464, passed=34807 Got 34807 stars (including 27048 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34807 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4813 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29725 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29725 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29725 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4813 stars left (next iteration limit 5294) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits N_match=4813 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.376 n_q1=1502 n_q2=811 n_q3=1601 n_q4=899 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4813 N_valid=4813 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.000 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.007 median_sep_arcsec=0.325 p95_sep_arcsec=0.784 n_q1=1502 n_q2=811 n_q3=1601 n_q4=899 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.A4yGgIwDef (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1579, bad_region=6463, passed=34873 Got 34873 stars (including 27122 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34873 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4813 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29815 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29815 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29815 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4813 stars left (next iteration limit 5294) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits N_match=4813 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=1491 n_q2=818 n_q3=1608 n_q4=896 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4813 N_valid=4813 bias_ra_arcsec=0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.006 median_sep_arcsec=0.328 p95_sep_arcsec=0.770 n_q1=1491 n_q2=818 n_q3=1608 n_q4=896 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -region wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.YeVtpUfara (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=535, bad_region=2870, passed=19352 Got 19352 stars (including 15999 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19352 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4747 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4736 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4736 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17202 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4745 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4735 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17202 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4735 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17202 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4735 stars left (next iteration limit 5209) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4735 robust_rms=6.655 arcsec worst_region_rms=10.149 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=10.149 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4735 robust_rms=0.659 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.684 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.684 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4735 robust_rms=0.482 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.608 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.511 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4735 robust_rms_before=1.636 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.384 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.482 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.508 worst_region_rms_after=0.608 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.518 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.511 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.508 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.508 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.384 arcsec matched=4735 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits N_match=4735 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.373 n_q1=1551 n_q2=729 n_q3=1623 n_q4=832 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.030 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4735 N_valid=4735 bias_ra_arcsec=0.662 bias_dec_arcsec=0.474 median_sep_arcsec=1.472 p95_sep_arcsec=2.851 n_q1=1551 n_q2=729 n_q3=1623 n_q4=832 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.0EiG9o1MCd (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=569, bad_region=2953, passed=19750 Got 19750 stars (including 16292 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19750 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4742 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4732 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4733 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4732 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17533 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4742 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4732 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17533 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4732 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17533 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4732 stars left (next iteration limit 5205) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4732 robust_rms=6.535 arcsec worst_region_rms=9.994 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=9.994 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4732 robust_rms=0.577 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.650 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.613 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4732 robust_rms=0.434 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.512 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.496 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4732 robust_rms_before=1.510 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.373 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.434 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.482 worst_region_rms_after=0.512 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.424 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.496 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.482 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.482 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.373 arcsec matched=4732 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits N_match=4732 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.351 n_q1=1544 n_q2=735 n_q3=1624 n_q4=829 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4732 N_valid=4732 bias_ra_arcsec=0.677 bias_dec_arcsec=0.470 median_sep_arcsec=1.348 p95_sep_arcsec=2.689 n_q1=1544 n_q2=735 n_q3=1624 n_q4=829 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/wcs_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:16:41.81 +53:12:22.8: 12.59 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 11:33:45.39 +55:34:31.5: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:16:41.81 +53:12:22.8: 12.57 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:16:41.81 +53:12:22.8: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8897 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 10:54:39.08 +54:18:19.7: 13.22 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 11:33:45.39 +55:34:31.5: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:45.39 +55:34:31.5: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8281 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:54:39.08 +54:18:19.7: 13.20 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:54:39.08 +54:18:19.7: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0757 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0288.fits at 10:36:00.98 +51:17:55.9: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-42-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 10:36:00.98 +51:17:55.9: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:36:00.98 +51:17:55.9: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8377 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51923_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 51923_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.89 10:54:41.10 +53:33:07.9 2726 3066 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 10:54:41.15 +53:33:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51925_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 51925_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.31855 2461349.81855 13.10 11:16:41.76 +53:12:22.9 4685 2715 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.76 11:16:41.86 +53:12:22.7 4687 2710 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51944_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 51944_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 10.37 11:45:15.12 +51:50:29.3 7319 1924 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51955_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 51955_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=4. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=4. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 10.75 11:42:54.30 +51:14:17.4 7119 1546 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51956_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 51956_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 10.95 11:07:18.51 +54:00:14.7 3875 3235 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52003_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52003_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 11.77 10:51:43.10 +57:41:32.7 2777 5588 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52019_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52019_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 11.96 11:43:20.00 +57:34:04.9 6950 5374 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52036_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52036_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.23 10:39:20.68 +57:44:06.8 1784 5768 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52040_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52040_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.08 11:40:44.21 +50:19:24.0 6939 0981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52042_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52042_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.15 11:08:21.67 +58:02:10.5 4133 5663 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52050_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52050_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.12 11:41:31.95 +50:37:32.0 7007 1168 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52060_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52060_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.28 11:12:32.10 +57:57:14.5 4464 5593 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52086_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52086_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.42 11:02:20.67 +58:02:02.7 3652 5700 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52087_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52087_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.41 11:36:41.52 +50:06:59.2 6552 0840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52107_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52107_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.55 11:35:43.83 +53:43:30.8 6397 3020 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52120_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52120_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.62 11:23:51.25 +57:01:37.7 5364 5003 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52121_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52121_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.73 10:43:56.89 +57:26:51.7 2128 5532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52130_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52130_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.50 11:34:39.20 +55:00:14.5 6282 3789 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52134_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52134_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.74 10:57:34.58 +55:57:40.4 3139 4487 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52135_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52135_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.71 11:24:05.83 +54:17:53.1 5363 3354 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52139_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52139_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.62 11:33:33.59 +53:43:57.1 6203 3019 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52143_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52143_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.67 11:36:47.47 +54:32:47.9 6476 3519 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52146_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52146_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.66 11:47:41.34 +56:22:07.1 7355 4673 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52154_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52154_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.74 11:07:52.17 +57:33:59.3 4074 5381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52159_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52159_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.76 11:05:27.76 +54:26:03.9 3732 3506 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52167_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52167_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.31855 2461349.81855 12.81 11:33:45.35 +55:34:31.1 6195 4136 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.85 11:33:45.44 +55:34:31.9 6197 4132 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52168_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52168_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.62 11:33:30.93 +57:54:27.5 6148 5544 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52172_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52172_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.76 11:32:53.03 +55:42:15.7 6121 4208 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52178_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52178_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.96 11:18:26.08 +53:28:33.8 4849 2868 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52188_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52188_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.83 11:47:03.49 +54:01:38.1 7398 3255 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52189_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52189_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.92 11:15:39.63 +56:40:32.4 4682 4807 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52190_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52190_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 12.77 11:41:00.24 +56:24:24.4 6793 4659 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52194_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52194_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.00 11:00:24.41 +51:28:26.2 3117 1761 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 11:00:24.41 +51:28:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52201_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52201_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.18 11:19:08.83 +56:40:54.9 4971 4801 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52206_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52206_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.31855 2461349.81855 13.04 10:54:39.01 +54:18:18.4 2774 3524 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.11 10:54:39.16 +54:18:20.9 2777 3519 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52209_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52209_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=2.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.02 10:52:22.78 +52:31:33.0 2443 2474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 10:52:22.79 +52:31:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52231_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52231_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.06 11:21:37.00 +57:04:11.6 5181 5031 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 11:21:37.00 +57:04:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52237_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52237_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.20 10:52:38.97 +57:25:18.6 2832 5415 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52255_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52255_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.07 11:45:23.50 +53:05:35.8 7285 2681 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52258_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52258_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.13 11:36:25.02 +52:07:13.6 6488 2053 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52280_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52280_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.04 11:34:55.94 +55:08:37.3 6304 3874 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52290_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52290_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.03 11:47:07.69 +52:21:47.5 7473 2251 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52300_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52300_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.40 11:03:40.08 +57:20:57.8 3723 5276 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52305_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52305_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.26 11:30:20.22 +50:33:30.8 5933 1095 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52320_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52320_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.28 11:30:10.44 +56:57:27.2 5884 4962 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52331_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52331_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.39 11:18:25.31 +56:55:54.9 4916 4954 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52340_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52340_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.58 11:12:39.22 +57:03:25.0 4445 5049 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52343_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52343_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.42 11:23:10.55 +56:29:21.3 5303 4678 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52354_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52354_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.66 11:11:34.69 +57:42:34.8 4379 5449 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52358_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52358_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.41 11:39:50.07 +54:41:25.7 6739 3617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52359_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52359_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.55 11:17:06.29 +54:54:28.1 4762 3735 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52362_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52362_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.45 11:33:04.53 +57:14:31.2 6120 5139 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52364_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52364_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.77 10:41:23.64 +52:57:13.4 1478 2871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 10:41:23.52 +52:57:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52366_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52366_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.66 11:06:17.84 +57:14:25.9 3932 5193 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52367_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52367_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.48 10:56:44.54 +53:07:03.7 2882 2785 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 10:56:44.60 +53:07:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52369_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52369_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.08 11:40:17.67 +56:14:24.0 6738 4555 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52370_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52370_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.50 11:16:34.31 +55:22:51.1 4727 4022 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52372_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52372_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.53 11:43:17.43 +49:44:00.9 7206 0635 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52378_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52378_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.65 11:26:55.38 +57:26:22.7 5617 5252 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52390_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52390_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.68 11:29:59.49 +51:20:47.4 5896 1572 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52398_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52398_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.52 11:21:28.58 +56:49:58.6 5166 4888 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52403_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52403_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.69 11:13:10.76 +55:00:01.4 4425 3805 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52416_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52416_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.84 11:15:36.52 +53:33:57.7 4598 2931 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52420_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52420_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.74 11:18:36.59 +55:16:06.3 4899 3948 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 11:18:36.63 +55:16:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52421_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52421_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.50 11:45:30.25 +56:23:04.5 7171 4669 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52422_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52422_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.31855 2461349.81855 13.83 10:36:01.02 +51:17:56.6 0802 1967 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-38-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0418.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.85 10:36:00.93 +51:17:55.3 0804 1962 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52424_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52424_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.94 11:29:31.25 +50:27:45.0 5855 1036 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52426_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52426_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.72 11:27:44.09 +54:40:38.7 5683 3582 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52427_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52427_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.58 11:46:14.56 +56:36:48.9 7224 4812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52432_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52432_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.72 11:30:01.22 +58:05:29.8 5866 5650 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52433_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52433_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.62 11:44:08.85 +49:50:51.1 7286 0709 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52451_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52451_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.03 11:40:30.94 +52:56:39.9 6846 2566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52454_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52454_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.88 11:11:16.16 +58:01:26.3 4365 5641 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52456_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52456_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.69 11:08:22.35 +57:49:07.2 4125 5531 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52464_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52464_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.72 11:45:38.55 +49:56:00.8 7429 0770 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52495_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52495_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.88 11:19:22.16 +54:10:05.3 4945 3283 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52496_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52496_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.87 11:33:55.39 +52:28:44.4 6252 2263 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52503_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52503_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.09 10:42:43.74 +55:54:02.3 1881 4619 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 10:42:43.72 +55:54:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52505_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52505_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.22 10:52:24.50 +57:33:00.7 2822 5495 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52506_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52506_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.90 11:36:24.53 +51:26:03.6 6500 1638 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52511_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52511_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.00 11:29:20.95 +57:34:38.9 5814 5337 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52515_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52515_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.29 10:59:23.43 +55:43:41.4 3278 4331 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52518_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52518_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.68 11:14:16.02 +55:21:15.5 4529 4014 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52520_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52520_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.96 11:46:52.22 +54:03:32.6 7380 3273 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52522_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52522_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.85 11:35:58.91 +53:45:01.8 6419 3036 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52524_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52524_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.97 11:22:01.46 +55:18:54.9 5193 3970 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52532_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52532_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.18 11:27:50.88 +54:17:22.6 5693 3348 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52537_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52537_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.96 11:33:45.00 +54:35:18.5 6209 3536 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52541_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52541_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.10 11:38:58.86 +53:09:43.2 6701 2691 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52551_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52551_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.27 11:35:04.87 +55:08:05.3 6317 3869 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52558_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52558_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.12 11:37:27.96 +53:38:00.0 6554 2970 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52567_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52567_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.08 11:24:02.83 +52:25:13.7 5344 2221 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52570_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52570_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.11 11:41:09.32 +50:53:32.4 6963 1328 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52571_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52571_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.31 11:12:31.92 +56:54:02.9 4430 4955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52574_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52574_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.12 11:08:49.13 +56:26:32.6 4106 4696 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52576_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52576_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.21 11:15:34.91 +57:05:12.6 4686 5056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52578_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52578_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.35 11:38:02.48 +55:40:08.7 6561 4201 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52580_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52580_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.36 11:03:12.83 +57:32:31.7 3696 5396 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52585_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52585_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.39 11:12:45.29 +56:40:02.9 4441 4813 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52601_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52601_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.27 11:09:10.60 +54:48:44.3 4072 3711 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52603_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52603_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.34 11:06:10.99 +57:35:58.2 3939 5411 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52604_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52604_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.61 11:45:11.62 +57:32:51.6 7102 5372 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52605_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52605_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.30 11:17:30.48 +53:51:00.4 4774 3096 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52606_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52606_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.44 10:58:47.65 +56:28:25.0 3273 4785 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52613_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52613_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.53 10:48:56.94 +55:03:19.5 2337 4032 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52616_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52616_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.56 11:22:33.15 +50:56:14.3 5190 1326 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52624_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52624_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.71 10:36:55.89 +54:50:58.2 1278 4074 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52630_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52630_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.31 11:36:18.54 +55:12:05.6 6422 3913 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52633_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 52633_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 14.51 11:11:41.45 +54:06:11.8 4266 3271 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31789_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 31789_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.49 10:32:37.56 +55:10:43.8 0943 4341 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 26524_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 The candidate 26524_fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461093.77948: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461093.77995: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.31928 2461349.81928 13.02 11:27:03.91 +58:19:18.7 5630 5788 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_020603_TTUQ2b1x1_3314779_cjyoP4T9/fd_UMa-07-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-39-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0419.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-07-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.81855278 -observatory V36 14:33:37.89 -15:12:18.2 Mercury (6.2mag) 13:23:16.07 -12:50:53.9 Venus (-4.5mag) 09:33:23.75 +16:17:35.3 Mars (0.8mag) 09:47:57.52 +14:02:06.8 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:35:59.33 +00:58:10.6 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:08:43.37 +20:49:19.7 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:08:11.50 -00:39:09.0 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:32.76 -23:41:13.2 Pluto (14.5mag) 11:43:25.79 -01:06:02.6 Moon (-9.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Nov 5 02:10 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.81855278: 09:47:51.07 +14:02:44.5 Io (6.0mag) 09:48:07.67 +14:01:08.2 Europa (6.1mag) 09:47:44.69 +14:03:22.2 Ganymede (5.5mag) 09:48:25.88 +13:59:26.5 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:49:32.67 +14:10:18.9 Himalia (15.5mag) 09:47:54.16 +14:02:25.9 Thebe (16.3mag) 09:47:50.26 +14:27:12.4 Elara (17.4mag) 09:48:33.45 +13:30:31.6 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 09:44:51.65 +14:34:19.3 Carme (18.7mag) 00:36:11.44 +00:57:55.8 Titan (8.3mag) 00:35:54.36 +00:58:01.4 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:36:32.37 +00:59:12.4 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:35:55.74 +00:57:39.5 Hyperion (14.2mag) 00:34:12.61 +00:46:05.6 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Nov 5 02:10 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.81855278: 04:41:07.94 +16:51:45.5 JWST 19:21:52.40 -06:17:26.7 Chandra 06:56:49.71 -02:57:19.4 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Nov 5 02:10 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.81855278 -observatory V36 03:32:12.81 +19:53:59.3 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:47:12.14 +38:31:24.7 17.8mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill) 07:47:17.53 +38:31:11.9 17.8mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 07:46:35.72 +38:31:32.4 17.8mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill) 05:01:22.07 +38:46:20.6 17.7mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski) 18:50:14.01 -32:49:06.1 15.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:45:23.03 -74:01:35.3 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:10:57.84 +35:21:38.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 21:43:02.45 +20:29:07.1 17.9mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:35:51.06 +25:20:24.5 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:08:41.80 +38:48:24.6 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:38:18.21 +40:51:28.1 17.5mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:42:24.05 -13:30:43.5 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 14:17:22.45 -04:44:05.6 16.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 20:21:52.43 +51:49:25.5 15.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 13:09:22.38 +17:15:24.1 17.7mag A/2026 E1 15:55:55.48 -66:31:53.1 14.7mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 19:35:57.12 -05:23:39.0 17.1mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS) 10:46:58.66 +02:36:25.0 17.5mag P/2026 U1 (Gafton) 23:24:32.44 +13:33:36.4 16.9mag 2P/Encke 23:28:32.63 -25:14:11.2 15.5mag 10P/Tempel 02:42:14.12 +29:32:38.8 16.5mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:27:20.15 -10:11:20.8 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:10:02.61 -08:59:09.7 15.9mag 65P/Gunn 08:01:37.10 +13:23:53.2 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 20:56:46.40 -24:19:22.2 16.5mag 84P/Giclas 10:41:53.05 +13:12:14.1 17.6mag 93P/Lovas 09:06:00.95 +46:21:19.1 16.8mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:54:40.36 +04:52:11.9 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 12:30:33.26 +07:37:27.7 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 23:26:13.74 -00:57:15.0 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 19:44:46.01 +14:53:53.9 10.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 11:16:04.75 -03:26:24.7 16.3mag 169P/NEAT 09:42:20.87 +23:24:44.0 18.0mag 186P/Garradd 03:08:52.56 +02:03:32.1 15.4mag 220P/McNaught 06:22:40.99 +50:05:25.2 15.9mag 260P/McNaught 07:58:23.38 +25:02:33.9 17.5mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Nov 5 02:10 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:58:35.28 +22:20:06.50 ASASSN-26fs 2026-11-2.4 12.31 02:29:41.13 -71:57:55.60 ASASSN-26fr 2026-11-1.22 13.7 21:27:22.43 -18:15:42.10 SN 2026agsu 2026-10-29.85 -1.08 17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92 10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27 21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82 01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9 01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88 00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77 22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42 01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3 18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Nov 5 02:10 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag 05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag 05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Nov 5 02:10 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 22:29:52.275 +18:34:19.42 AT 2026afzp 2026-10-14.36 20.48 02:39:11.125 +17:41:15.14 AT 2026afzo 2026-10-14.38 21.95 02:27:41.006 +23:04:08.87 AT 2026afzn 2026-10-14.38 20.75 23:41:28.246 +15:22:55.44 AT 2026afzm 2026-10-14.42 20.55 05:57:09.596 -21:44:23.09 AT 2026afzl 2026-10-17.60 20.86 06:39:03.694 -23:31:00.11 AT 2026afzk 2026-10-17.61 20.62 00:27:26.818 +29:16:40.85 AT 2026afzj 2026-10-19.27 20.83 18:22:09.520 +25:34:07.56 AT 2026afzi 2026-10-19.22 20.74 22:54:46.804 +38:52:38.17 AT 2026afzh 2026-10-19.25 20.81 22:15:16.031 +35:30:23.42 AT 2026afzg 2026-10-19.24 20.32 01:33:58.403 +22:17:36.22 AT 2026afzf 2026-10-19.32 21.11 00:11:26.192 +27:26:48.54 AT 2026afze 2026-10-19.28 20.29 02:50:45.989 +30:17:57.81 AT 2026afzd 2026-10-19.37 20.98 04:03:41.821 +30:40:43.11 AT 2026afzc 2026-10-19.46 21.47 02:58:55.564 -03:52:08.16 AT 2026afzb 2026-10-19.49 20.93 01:55:10.544 +04:10:57.79 AT 2026afza 2026-10-19.41 20.67 01:01:52.348 +00:04:56.03 AT 2026afyz 2026-10-20.38 21.03 03:32:22.207 +22:40:19.08 AT 2026afyy 2026-10-19.41 20.9 03:38:00.600 -06:45:14.10 AT 2026afyx 2026-10-19.49 21.27 01:28:24.132 +05:07:56.12 AT 2026afyw 2026-10-19.40 20.4 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Nov 5 02:10 tns_transients_list.txt
JD 2461093.77948: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461093.77995: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81855: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81928: SE_FLAGS=0.
