NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cet-07-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    10.93    01:46:03.73 -13:12:48.0   4260 5118   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    10.91    01:46:03.69 -13:12:48.1   4262 5112   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 11 05.3148  2461349.8148  10.92  01:46:03.71 -13:12:48.0
168.17091 -71.11334 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.9 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
532 Herculina               -1     -1       1  10.9     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:46:03.71 -13:12:48.0:  15.80 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:46:03.71 -13:12:48.0:  15.80 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-07-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    11.91    02:08:40.56 -05:44:06.1   1023 0485   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    11.87    02:08:40.53 -05:44:06.6   1026 0479   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 11 05.3148  2461349.8148  11.89  02:08:40.55 -05:44:06.3
167.05505 -61.79773 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
622 Esther                  -1     -1       1  12.1     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:08:40.55 -05:44:06.3:  15.63 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:08:40.55 -05:44:06.3:  15.59 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-07-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.13    01:49:17.41 -08:18:01.2   3898 2142   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.13    01:49:17.40 -08:18:01.4   3900 2136   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 11 05.3148  2461349.8148  12.13  01:49:17.40 -08:18:01.3
161.63667 -66.71982 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
360 Carlova                 -1     -0       1  12.2     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:49:17.40 -08:18:01.3:  15.91 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:49:17.40 -08:18:01.3:  15.94 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-07-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    13.23    01:51:18.73 -07:03:47.8   3623 1384   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    13.21    01:51:18.65 -07:03:46.7   3626 1378   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 11 05.3148  2461349.8148  13.22  01:51:18.69 -07:03:47.3
160.96155 -65.41345 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.0 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
1093 Freda                   -1     -0       1  13.2    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:51:18.69 -07:03:47.3:  16.03 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:51:18.69 -07:03:47.3:  16.04 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-07-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    14.15    01:48:12.94 -10:06:43.1   4016 3238   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    14.17    01:48:12.84 -10:06:44.8   4019 3232   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 11 05.3148  2461349.8148  14.16  01:48:12.89 -10:06:43.9
163.80605 -68.35290 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 6.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
891 Gunhild                 -0      0       0  14.2     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:48:12.89 -10:06:43.9:  16.01 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:48:12.89 -10:06:43.9:  16.08 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-07-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    14.33    01:48:45.33 -06:11:39.0   4025 0874   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    14.38    01:48:45.30 -06:11:39.1   4028 0867   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 11 05.3148  2461349.8148  14.36  01:48:45.31 -06:11:39.0
158.57048 -65.02140 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
3066 McFadden                 1     -1       1  14.2    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:48:45.31 -06:11:39.0:  16.02 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:48:45.31 -06:11:39.0:  16.00 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-07-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 6

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-07-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Field Cet-07-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
Field Cet-07-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits
Field Cet-07-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=local (lib/catalogs/local_star_catalog -> local copy: Gaia DR2 gaia_source, G < 19.0, built from https://cdn.gea.esac.esa.int/Gaia/gdr2/gaia_source/csv on 2026-11-04)
The APASS known-star check of the candidates is disabled (see the note in util/transients/report_transient.sh)
WARNING: VizieR is unreachable (no mirror answered the test query) - the online identification of candidates is degraded for this run
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-07-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-07-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-07-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 545139 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 545139 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits_preview.png'
Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits

renamed 'Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits_preview.png'
Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. Field altitude during imaging: 38.0 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Field altitude during imaging: 37.9 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 846.8130 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 499.7854 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1253.1213 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 530.1913 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1253.4356 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 529.7232 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.47981 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 12.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 10.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-05T01:32:39.9308773' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T07:32:39.9308773' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.3143510418 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T07:32:49.8329553' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.314465648 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 25.7140656231258 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.99972008351136 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 38.01 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 218.405833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.62136170953547 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-07' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '01 42 51' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29449 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29449 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 12.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 12.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 83.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.21 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 10.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 26.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/d_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits :) Spent 0.491806 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/d_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 13.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 10.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-05T01:33:30.6767541' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T07:33:30.6767541' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.3149383795 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T07:33:40.5788585' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.3150529861 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 25.7140656334848 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -9.9997200589292 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 37.9016666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 218.628055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.6252770716942 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-07' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '01 42 51' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29449 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29449 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 13.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 13.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 83.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.21 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 10.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 26.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/d_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits :) Spent 0.504482 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/d_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits


fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461349.81446678 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 01:42:51.887 -10:01:12.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 01:43:00.765 -09:59:20.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 01:42:51.887 -10:01:12.35 Second-epoch image center 01:43:00.765 -09:59:20.73 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0478 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 01:43:01.737 -09:59:58.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 01:42:51.887 -10:01:12.35 Second-epoch image center 01:43:01.737 -09:59:58.48 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0453 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 01:43:00.765 -09:59:20.73 Second-epoch second image center 01:43:01.737 -09:59:58.48 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01122 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SZkusnZCeg Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OJr10p4KJU Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f9fFozvOKJ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VAbIoEaiMI Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits and wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits and wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits and wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 5413 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.6951 to 33.9052 deg, Dec -15.3338 to -4.6054 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.6951 to 33.9052 deg, Dec -15.3338 to -4.6054 deg Loaded 4186 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3306 out of 3435 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3435 out of 5413 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.915050 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.915050 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 5413 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.6951 to 33.9052 deg, Dec -15.3338 to -4.6054 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.6951 to 33.9052 deg, Dec -15.3338 to -4.6054 deg Loaded 4186 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3306 out of 3435 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3435 out of 5413 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits (aperture=5.8) Read 5432 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.7140 to 33.9201 deg, Dec -15.3337 to -4.6054 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.7140 to 33.9201 deg, Dec -15.3337 to -4.6054 deg Loaded 4184 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3435 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3435 out of 5432 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits (aperture=5.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 48 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits 2.0 pix Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits 4.4 pix fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits 4.4 pix fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits 15.4 mag. Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.SZkusnZCeg (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=369, bad_region=0, passed=5413 Got 5413 stars (including 5039 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5413 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5413 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5413 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5413 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.240 n_q1=1185 n_q2=1227 n_q3=1231 n_q4=1250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4893 N_valid=4893 bias_ra_arcsec=0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=0.000 median_sep_arcsec=0.232 p95_sep_arcsec=0.640 n_q1=1185 n_q2=1227 n_q3=1231 n_q4=1250 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits -region wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.OJr10p4KJU (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=371, bad_region=0, passed=5432 Got 5432 stars (including 5057 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5432 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5432 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5432 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5432 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.236 n_q1=1186 n_q2=1241 n_q3=1226 n_q4=1237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.256 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4890 N_valid=4890 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.234 p95_sep_arcsec=0.651 n_q1=1186 n_q2=1241 n_q3=1226 n_q4=1237 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits -region wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.f9fFozvOKJ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=240, bad_region=0, passed=5640 Got 5640 stars (including 5400 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5640 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.4 to -4.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.4 to -4.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5640 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5384) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=13.050 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.288 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.288 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=0.491 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.735 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.735 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=0.375 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.524 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.524 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4896 robust_rms_before=1.698 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.364 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.375 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.535 worst_region_rms_after=0.524 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.179 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.524 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.535 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.535 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.364 arcsec matched=4896 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.412 n_q1=1369 n_q2=1101 n_q3=1283 n_q4=1143 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4896 N_valid=4896 bias_ra_arcsec=-1.215 bias_dec_arcsec=0.758 median_sep_arcsec=1.551 p95_sep_arcsec=3.109 n_q1=1369 n_q2=1101 n_q3=1283 n_q4=1143 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.VAbIoEaiMI (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=239, bad_region=0, passed=5653 Got 5653 stars (including 5412 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5653 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 429 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5653 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 429 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5653 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5653 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5386) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=13.170 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.554 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.554 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=0.479 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.718 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.718 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4896 robust_rms=0.364 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.496 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.496 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4896 robust_rms_before=1.687 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.362 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.364 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.521 worst_region_rms_after=0.496 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.306 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.496 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.521 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.521 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.362 arcsec matched=4896 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=1358 n_q2=1106 n_q3=1279 n_q4=1153 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4896 N_valid=4896 bias_ra_arcsec=-1.219 bias_dec_arcsec=0.753 median_sep_arcsec=1.541 p95_sep_arcsec=3.116 n_q1=1358 n_q2=1106 n_q3=1279 n_q4=1153 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits sigma_overall=0.269 worst_q_ratio=1.279 ref2=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits sigma_overall=0.266 worst_q_ratio=1.256 new1=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.128 new2=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.136 reference average sigma_overall=0.2675 worst_q_ratio=1.2675 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111_astrometric_residuals.png (4893 matched stars from wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:57:13.50 -07:50:10.3: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:46:03.71 -13:12:48.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:42:46.76 -10:34:39.5: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:52:33.42 -10:55:02.1: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:54:22.82 -11:52:39.5: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:06:43.45 -09:14:17.6: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:08:40.55 -05:44:06.3: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:12:02.81 -08:08:18.3: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:46:12.74 -09:51:36.5: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:00:40.54 -08:35:45.8: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:06:43.45 -09:14:17.6: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:52:33.42 -10:55:02.1: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:54:22.82 -11:52:39.5: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:57:13.50 -07:50:10.3: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:06:43.45 -09:14:17.6: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0731 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:52:33.42 -10:55:02.1: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0980 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:08:40.55 -05:44:06.3: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:42:46.76 -10:34:39.5: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:46:03.71 -13:12:48.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:54:22.82 -11:52:39.5: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0727 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:57:13.50 -07:50:10.3: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7873 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:42:46.76 -10:34:39.5: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1054 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:12:02.81 -08:08:18.3: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:12:02.81 -08:08:18.3: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0964 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:00:40.54 -08:35:45.8: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:46:12.74 -09:51:36.5: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:00:40.54 -08:35:45.8: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0905 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:46:12.74 -09:51:36.5: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1512 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:44:32.01 -09:43:33.4: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:55:59.26 -09:04:31.6: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:49:17.40 -08:18:01.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:43:28.12 -08:55:25.1: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:48:11.38 -09:59:56.3: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:54:22.26 -11:00:27.2: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:46:23.67 -09:28:43.5: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:45:28.67 -11:07:22.3: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:49:17.40 -08:18:01.3: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:55:59.26 -09:04:31.6: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:48:11.38 -09:59:56.3: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:48:11.38 -09:59:56.3: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1587 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:43:28.12 -08:55:25.1: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:44:32.01 -09:43:33.4: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:55:59.26 -09:04:31.6: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1848 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:54:22.26 -11:00:27.2: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:44:32.01 -09:43:33.4: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1487 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:43:28.12 -08:55:25.1: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1664 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:54:22.26 -11:00:27.2: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1401 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:46:23.67 -09:28:43.5: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:45:28.67 -11:07:22.3: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:46:23.67 -09:28:43.5: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1443 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:45:28.67 -11:07:22.3: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1561 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:44:35.61 -08:17:58.8: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:51:52.20 -09:18:48.0: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:45:05.34 -09:27:53.1: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:51:27.66 -10:37:58.3: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:45:05.34 -09:27:53.1: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:44:35.61 -08:17:58.8: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:55:46.15 -08:03:21.1: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:56:40.21 -10:49:35.7: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:44:35.61 -08:17:58.8: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1588 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:45:05.34 -09:27:53.1: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1906 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:51:52.20 -09:18:48.0: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:51:52.20 -09:18:48.0: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1597 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:42:50.03 -08:07:04.6: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:51:27.66 -10:37:58.3: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:55:46.15 -08:03:21.1: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:51:27.66 -10:37:58.3: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1928 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:55:46.15 -08:03:21.1: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2126 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:56:40.21 -10:49:35.7: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:56:40.21 -10:49:35.7: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1750 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:42:50.03 -08:07:04.6: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:42:50.03 -08:07:04.6: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1892 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:45:48.38 -10:39:38.5: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:05:44.06 -05:33:01.5: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:54:27.00 -09:40:03.0: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:45:48.38 -10:39:38.5: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:45:48.38 -10:39:38.5: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1976 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:05:44.06 -05:33:01.5: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:05:44.06 -05:33:01.5: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2392 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:49:33.85 -06:48:00.2: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:56:10.74 -08:33:32.3: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:54:27.00 -09:40:03.0: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:54:27.00 -09:40:03.0: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2050 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:42:59.79 -09:09:46.0: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:56:10.74 -08:33:32.3: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:56:10.74 -08:33:32.3: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2025 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:41:36.08 -09:04:32.4: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:49:33.85 -06:48:00.2: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:49:33.85 -06:48:00.2: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1977 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:42:59.79 -09:09:46.0: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:42:59.79 -09:09:46.0: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2098 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:41:36.08 -09:04:32.4: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:41:36.08 -09:04:32.4: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2199 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:43:19.54 -08:55:34.2: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:49:56.55 -08:11:43.6: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:02:19.95 -09:03:24.6: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:10:54.73 -06:15:22.3: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:02:19.95 -09:03:24.6: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:02:19.95 -09:03:24.6: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2062 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:43:19.54 -08:55:34.2: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:49:56.55 -08:11:43.6: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:08:47.65 -08:54:54.4: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:49:56.55 -08:11:43.6: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2335 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:43:19.54 -08:55:34.2: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2252 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:10:54.73 -06:15:22.3: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:10:54.73 -06:15:22.3: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1869 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:12:16.93 -05:57:30.0: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:09:24.52 -10:08:08.5: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:08:47.65 -08:54:54.4: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:08:47.65 -08:54:54.4: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1968 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:12:16.93 -05:57:30.0: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:12:16.93 -05:57:30.0: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2371 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:09:24.52 -10:08:08.5: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:09:24.52 -10:08:08.5: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2408 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:49:59.53 -09:25:39.8: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:47:15.14 -09:01:54.0: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:14:04.18 -06:52:48.8: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 02:10:40.22 -06:52:33.8: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:49:59.53 -09:25:39.8: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:49:59.53 -09:25:39.8: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2567 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:58:43.59 -08:21:02.9: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:14:04.18 -06:52:48.8: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:47:15.14 -09:01:54.0: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:14:04.18 -06:52:48.8: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2358 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:47:15.14 -09:01:54.0: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2393 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 02:10:40.22 -06:52:33.8: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:10:40.22 -06:52:33.8: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2511 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:55:02.65 -07:24:32.6: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:58:43.59 -08:21:02.9: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:58:43.59 -08:21:02.9: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2420 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:55:02.65 -07:24:32.6: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:55:02.65 -07:24:32.6: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2713 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20273.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20336.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20366.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20273_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 Preparing report for the candidate 20273_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20324_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20324_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    11.79    01:57:13.49 -07:50:10.1   2722 1819   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    11.79    01:57:13.50 -07:50:10.5   2725 1813   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20336_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 Preparing report for the candidate 20336_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20350_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20350_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.02    01:45:16.18 -08:24:35.4   4496 2225   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

**** FOUND 01:45:16.18 -08:24:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20352_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20352_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.06    02:06:43.46 -09:14:17.4   1272 2623   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.09    02:06:43.45 -09:14:17.9   1274 2617   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20353_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20353_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.01    02:11:18.19 -09:14:20.5   0582 2601   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=1.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=1.

**** FOUND 02:11:18.20 -09:14:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20355_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20355_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.08    02:12:06.81 -07:49:25.8   0476 1737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

**** FOUND 02:12:06.82 -07:49:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20356_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20356_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.10    01:42:46.74 -10:34:39.2   4809 3550   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.12    01:42:46.79 -10:34:39.7   4811 3544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20357_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20357_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.10    01:52:33.42 -10:55:02.4   3355 3699   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.10    01:52:33.42 -10:55:01.8   3358 3693   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20358_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20358_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.10    01:54:22.81 -11:52:39.5   3066 4269   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.05    01:54:22.84 -11:52:39.4   3068 4263   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20360_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20360_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.10    02:00:40.55 -08:35:45.7   2191 2261   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.09    02:00:40.53 -08:35:45.8   2194 2255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20362_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20362_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.10    02:12:02.81 -08:08:18.1   0480 1935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.09    02:12:02.82 -08:08:18.5   0482 1929   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20365_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20365_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.14    01:46:12.73 -09:51:37.0   4319 3098   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.17    01:46:12.75 -09:51:36.0   4321 3092   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20366_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 Preparing report for the candidate 20366_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20369_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20369_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.14    01:43:28.12 -08:55:25.0   4749 2551   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.20    01:43:28.13 -08:55:25.3   4751 2545   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20371_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20371_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.14    01:54:22.25 -11:00:27.3   3085 3745   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.14    01:54:22.28 -11:00:27.2   3088 3739   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20373_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20373_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.15    01:44:32.01 -09:43:33.5   4571 3027   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.15    01:44:32.01 -09:43:33.4   4573 3021   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20374_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20374_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.15    01:55:59.26 -09:04:31.5   2883 2573   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.23    01:55:59.26 -09:04:31.7   2886 2567   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20376_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20376_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.16    01:48:11.38 -09:59:56.3   4022 3170   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.16    01:48:11.38 -09:59:56.3   4025 3164   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20377_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20377_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.16    01:45:28.65 -11:07:22.4   4397 3862   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.16    01:45:28.68 -11:07:22.2   4399 3855   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20378_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20378_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.16    01:46:23.64 -09:28:43.4   4301 2868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.13    01:46:23.69 -09:28:43.6   4303 2861   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20382_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20382_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.17    01:45:05.34 -09:27:52.9   4495 2867   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.21    01:45:05.34 -09:27:53.2   4497 2861   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20383_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20383_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.17    01:44:35.59 -08:17:58.7   4597 2169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.15    01:44:35.63 -08:17:58.8   4600 2163   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20384_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20384_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.18    01:51:52.22 -09:18:48.3   3491 2737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.14    01:51:52.19 -09:18:47.8   3494 2731   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20385_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20385_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.18    01:56:40.23 -10:49:35.7   2748 3625   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.17    01:56:40.20 -10:49:35.8   2750 3619   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20386_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20386_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.19    01:42:50.02 -08:07:04.5   4863 2071   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.19    01:42:50.03 -08:07:04.6   4866 2064   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20387_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20387_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.19    01:51:27.66 -10:37:58.5   3524 3534   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.19    01:51:27.65 -10:37:58.1   3526 3528   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20389_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20389_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.20    01:55:46.14 -08:03:21.0   2936 1959   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.22    01:55:46.17 -08:03:21.3   2938 1953   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20390_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20390_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.20    01:45:48.37 -10:39:38.6   4359 3582   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.20    01:45:48.38 -10:39:38.3   4362 3576   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20391_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20391_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.21    01:54:27.00 -09:40:03.1   3100 2937   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.20    01:54:27.00 -09:40:02.9   3103 2931   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20392_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20392_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.21    02:05:44.05 -05:33:01.7   1474 0387   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.27    02:05:44.07 -05:33:01.2   1477 0381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20393_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20393_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.20    01:49:33.85 -06:48:00.3   3890 1235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.19    01:49:33.86 -06:48:00.1   3893 1229   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20394_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20394_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.21    01:56:10.74 -08:33:32.5   2865 2261   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.20    01:56:10.73 -08:33:32.2   2867 2254   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20395_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20395_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.21    01:42:59.78 -09:09:46.2   4813 2698   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.21    01:42:59.80 -09:09:45.8   4815 2692   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20396_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20396_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.22    01:41:36.06 -09:04:32.7   5022 2655   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.22    01:41:36.10 -09:04:32.1   5025 2648   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20397_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20397_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.23    01:49:56.54 -08:11:43.5   3803 2075   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.24    01:49:56.56 -08:11:43.8   3805 2069   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20400_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20400_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.21    02:02:19.95 -09:03:24.3   1935 2532   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.20    02:02:19.95 -09:03:24.9   1937 2526   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20401_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20401_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.23    01:43:19.54 -08:55:34.0   4770 2554   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.22    01:43:19.55 -08:55:34.3   4772 2548   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20402_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20402_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.21    02:10:54.73 -06:15:22.2   0675 0792   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.16    02:10:54.73 -06:15:22.4   0677 0786   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20403_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20403_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.21    02:08:47.65 -08:54:54.5   0964 2419   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.19    02:08:47.65 -08:54:54.2   0966 2413   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20404_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20404_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.22    02:09:24.54 -10:08:09.3   0854 3158   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.26    02:09:24.50 -10:08:07.7   0857 3151   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20405_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20405_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.23    02:12:16.93 -05:57:30.1   0468 0604   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.25    02:12:16.93 -05:57:29.9   0471 0597   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20406_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20406_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.23    01:49:59.53 -09:25:39.7   3768 2816   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.29    01:49:59.52 -09:25:39.9   3771 2810   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20407_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20407_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.23    02:14:04.15 -06:52:48.6   0184 1159   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.24    02:14:04.21 -06:52:49.0   0187 1153   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20409_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20409_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.24    01:47:15.14 -09:01:54.2   4184 2594   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.24    01:47:15.14 -09:01:53.7   4187 2587   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20411_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20411_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.25    02:10:40.21 -06:52:33.6   0705 1172   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.25    02:10:40.24 -06:52:34.1   0707 1166   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20412_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20412_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.24    01:58:43.59 -08:21:03.0   2487 2122   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.24    01:58:43.60 -08:21:02.8   2490 2116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20414_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 20414_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    12.25    01:55:02.66 -07:24:32.8   3057 1572   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.29    01:55:02.63 -07:24:32.4   3060 1566   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 01:46:03.71 -13:12:48.0 02:08:40.55 -05:44:06.3 01:49:17.40 -08:18:01.3 wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 01:42:51.887 -10:01:12.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 01:43:00.765 -09:59:20.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 01:42:51.887 -10:01:12.35 Second-epoch image center 01:43:00.765 -09:59:20.73 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0478 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 01:43:01.737 -09:59:58.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 01:42:51.887 -10:01:12.35 Second-epoch image center 01:43:01.737 -09:59:58.48 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0453 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 01:43:00.765 -09:59:20.73 Second-epoch second image center 01:43:01.737 -09:59:58.48 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01122 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8OmTEUxjsO Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fUOX6sBwpf Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KlheA1DDi2 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ed0Vh8PHCk Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits and wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits and wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits and wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 28292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.6948 to 33.9309 deg, Dec -15.3404 to -4.5625 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.6948 to 33.9309 deg, Dec -15.3404 to -4.5625 deg Loaded 4228 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3275 out of 3520 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3520 out of 28292 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.828500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.828500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 28292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.6948 to 33.9309 deg, Dec -15.3404 to -4.5625 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.6948 to 33.9309 deg, Dec -15.3404 to -4.5625 deg Loaded 4228 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3275 out of 3520 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3520 out of 28292 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 28381 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 17.6971 to 33.9326 deg, Dec -15.3394 to -4.5622 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 17.6971 to 33.9326 deg, Dec -15.3394 to -4.5622 deg Loaded 4228 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3270 out of 3519 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3519 out of 28381 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits (aperture=4.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 19 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits 1.9 pix Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits 3.9 pix fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits 4.0 pix fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits 15.6 mag. Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.8OmTEUxjsO (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1018, bad_region=4, passed=28287 Got 28287 stars (including 27224 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28287 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28287 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28287 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28287 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.233 n_q1=1255 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1251 n_q4=1190 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4895 N_valid=4895 bias_ra_arcsec=0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.229 p95_sep_arcsec=0.635 n_q1=1255 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1251 n_q4=1190 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits -region wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.fUOX6sBwpf (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1046, bad_region=4, passed=28368 Got 28368 stars (including 27282 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28368 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28368 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28368 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28368 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.230 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.238 n_q1=1255 n_q2=1189 n_q3=1250 n_q4=1206 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4900 N_valid=4900 bias_ra_arcsec=0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.230 p95_sep_arcsec=0.637 n_q1=1255 n_q2=1189 n_q3=1250 n_q4=1206 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits -region wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.KlheA1DDi2 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=867, bad_region=48, passed=20905 Got 20905 stars (including 19970 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20905 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.4 to -4.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20905 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.4 to -4.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20905 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20905 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5358) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=13.086 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.368 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.368 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.492 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.735 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.735 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.375 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.516 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.516 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4871 robust_rms_before=1.714 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.364 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.375 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.530 worst_region_rms_after=0.516 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.182 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.516 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.530 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.530 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.364 arcsec matched=4871 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.414 n_q1=1355 n_q2=1098 n_q3=1281 n_q4=1137 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4871 N_valid=4871 bias_ra_arcsec=-1.227 bias_dec_arcsec=0.782 median_sep_arcsec=1.569 p95_sep_arcsec=3.146 n_q1=1355 n_q2=1098 n_q3=1281 n_q4=1137 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Ed0Vh8PHCk (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=883, bad_region=48, passed=20921 Got 20921 stars (including 19978 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20921 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20921 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20921 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20921 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=13.101 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.804 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.804 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.482 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.716 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.716 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.362 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.493 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.493 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4875 robust_rms_before=1.704 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.362 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.362 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.516 worst_region_rms_after=0.493 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.303 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.493 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.516 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.516 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.362 arcsec matched=4875 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.413 n_q1=1360 n_q2=1101 n_q3=1287 n_q4=1127 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4875 N_valid=4875 bias_ra_arcsec=-1.232 bias_dec_arcsec=0.770 median_sep_arcsec=1.558 p95_sep_arcsec=3.113 n_q1=1360 n_q2=1101 n_q3=1287 n_q4=1127 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/wcs_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:48:12.89 -10:06:43.9: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:48:45.31 -06:11:39.0: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:51:18.69 -07:03:47.3: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:33:13.25 -13:13:56.3: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:37:08.54 -04:53:38.0: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits at 01:32:45.31 -07:40:25.1: 14.96 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:51:18.69 -07:03:47.3: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:48:45.31 -06:11:39.0: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:37:08.54 -04:53:38.0: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:48:12.89 -10:06:43.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:33:13.25 -13:13:56.3: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:37:08.54 -04:53:38.0: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1371 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:33:13.25 -13:13:56.3: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7981 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_21-27-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0112.fits at 01:32:45.31 -07:40:25.1: 14.86 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:32:45.31 -07:40:25.1: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7270 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32245.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32680.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32744.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31872_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 31872_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    14.22    01:37:08.62 -04:53:37.9   5803 0158   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    14.08    01:37:08.45 -04:53:38.1   5806 0152   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=2.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31880_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 31880_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    14.06    01:33:13.26 -13:13:54.8   6143 5215   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    13.67    01:33:13.24 -13:13:57.7   6146 5209   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 31944_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 31944_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    10.93    01:46:03.69 -13:12:48.1   4262 5112   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

**** FOUND 01:46:03.71 -13:12:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32012_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 32012_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.07    02:08:40.53 -05:44:06.6   1026 0479   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

**** FOUND 02:08:40.55 -05:44:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32034_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 32034_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    12.24    01:49:17.40 -08:18:01.4   3900 2136   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

**** FOUND 01:49:17.41 -08:18:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32245_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 Preparing report for the candidate 32245_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32314_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 32314_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    13.55    01:54:25.91 -11:51:24.1   3061 4250   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

**** FOUND 01:54:25.94 -11:51:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32655_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 32655_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    13.76    01:17:03.54 -06:11:18.7   8801 1083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32680_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 Preparing report for the candidate 32680_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32744_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 Preparing report for the candidate 32744_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 32956_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 32956_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 11 05.31447    2461349.81447    14.73    01:32:45.31 -07:40:25.4   6379 1870   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-32-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0318.fits Discovery image 2   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    14.72    01:32:45.32 -07:40:24.9   6382 1864   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 08941_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 08941_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    6.69    01:24:01.59 -08:11:04.2   7673 2238   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461032.64393: SE_FLAGS=4. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.
JD 2461032.64433: SE_FLAGS=4. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=4. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=4. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.

**** FOUND 01:24:01.59 -08:11:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 13619_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 13619_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    13.39    01:15:22.12 -09:37:36.4   8924 3185   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461032.64393: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461032.64433: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23583_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 23583_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    7.07    01:41:44.96 -11:19:34.6   4944 4001   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461032.64393: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461032.64433: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=0.

**** FOUND 01:41:44.95 -11:19:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 16551_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 16551_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    7.00    01:49:34.64 -10:41:08.1   3804 3569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461032.64393: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461032.64433: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=2.

**** FOUND 01:49:34.64 -10:41:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 15360_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 15360_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    6.98    01:51:27.53 -10:20:03.5   3533 3348   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461032.64393: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461032.64433: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=2.

**** FOUND 01:51:27.54 -10:20:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 10426_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 10426_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    6.82    02:00:26.66 -08:31:27.1   2230 2212   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461032.64393: SE_FLAGS=4. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.
JD 2461032.64433: SE_FLAGS=4. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=4. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=4. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.

**** FOUND 02:00:26.66 -08:31:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 19430_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 19430_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    6.65    01:25:37.44 -14:35:51.5   7220 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461032.64393: SE_FLAGS=4. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.
JD 2461032.64433: SE_FLAGS=4. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=4. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=4. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.

**** FOUND 01:25:37.43 -14:35:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 08319_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 The candidate 08319_fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 11 05.31505    2461349.81505    6.71    01:14:24.37 -07:55:13.4   9137 2158   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_013421_TTUQ1b1x1_3012134_FRujXeHY/fd_Cet-07-Q1b1x1_2026-11-05_01-33-30_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0319.fits

SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461032.64393: SE_FLAGS=7. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.
JD 2461032.64433: SE_FLAGS=7. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.
JD 2461349.81447: SE_FLAGS=7. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.
JD 2461349.81505: SE_FLAGS=7. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.

**** FOUND 01:14:24.38 -07:55:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 01:46:03.71 -13:12:48.0 02:08:40.55 -05:44:06.3 01:49:17.40 -08:18:01.3 01:51:18.69 -07:03:47.3 01:48:12.89 -10:06:43.9 01:48:45.31 -06:11:39.0 ########### Completed Cet-07-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 01:46:03.71 -13:12:48.0 02:08:40.55 -05:44:06.3 01:49:17.40 -08:18:01.3 01:51:18.69 -07:03:47.3 01:48:12.89 -10:06:43.9 01:48:45.31 -06:11:39.0 ################################################################################### 01:46:03.71 -13:12:48.0 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 02:08:40.55 -05:44:06.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 01:49:17.40 -08:18:01.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 01:51:18.69 -07:03:47.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 01:48:12.89 -10:06:43.9 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 01:48:45.31 -06:11:39.0 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.81446678 -observatory V36 14:33:39.00 -15:12:28.9 Mercury (6.2mag) 13:23:16.27 -12:50:59.2 Venus (-4.5mag) 09:33:23.27 +16:17:37.3 Mars (0.8mag) 09:47:57.42 +14:02:07.3 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:35:59.39 +00:58:10.9 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:08:43.41 +20:49:19.8 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:08:11.51 -00:39:08.9 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:32.75 -23:41:13.2 Pluto (14.5mag) 11:43:11.87 -01:04:32.0 Moon (-9.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Nov 5 01:45 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.81446678: 09:47:50.95 +14:02:45.1 Io (6.0mag) 09:48:07.53 +14:01:08.8 Europa (6.1mag) 09:47:44.63 +14:03:22.4 Ganymede (5.5mag) 09:48:25.79 +13:59:26.9 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:49:32.54 +14:10:19.5 Himalia (15.5mag) 09:47:54.07 +14:02:26.2 Thebe (16.3mag) 09:47:50.14 +14:27:12.9 Elara (17.4mag) 09:48:33.36 +13:30:32.0 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 09:44:51.56 +14:34:19.7 Carme (18.7mag) 00:36:11.50 +00:57:56.0 Titan (8.3mag) 00:35:54.40 +00:58:01.7 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:36:32.42 +00:59:12.6 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:35:55.78 +00:57:39.9 Hyperion (14.2mag) 00:34:12.66 +00:46:05.9 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Nov 5 01:45 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.81446678: 04:41:08.47 +16:51:47.9 JWST 19:20:30.21 -05:44:31.7 Chandra 06:55:59.94 -02:20:47.9 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Nov 5 01:45 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.81446678 -observatory V36 03:32:13.00 +19:53:59.6 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:47:12.07 +38:31:23.6 17.8mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill) 07:47:17.46 +38:31:10.7 17.8mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 07:46:35.66 +38:31:31.3 17.8mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill) 05:01:22.15 +38:46:23.2 17.7mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski) 18:50:13.73 -32:49:06.6 15.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:45:23.03 -74:01:34.3 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:10:57.91 +35:21:37.6 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 21:43:02.50 +20:29:09.0 17.9mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:35:51.05 +25:20:24.5 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:08:41.79 +38:48:22.4 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:38:18.04 +40:51:28.2 17.5mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:42:24.14 -13:30:43.9 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 14:17:22.18 -04:44:04.5 16.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 20:21:51.52 +51:49:35.5 15.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 13:09:22.15 +17:15:22.0 17.7mag A/2026 E1 15:55:56.05 -66:31:45.2 14.7mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 19:35:56.88 -05:23:38.9 17.1mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS) 10:46:58.35 +02:36:27.2 17.5mag P/2026 U1 (Gafton) 23:24:33.00 +13:33:40.3 16.9mag 2P/Encke 23:28:32.32 -25:14:15.4 15.5mag 10P/Tempel 02:42:13.87 +29:32:46.9 16.5mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:27:19.99 -10:11:19.6 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:10:02.69 -08:59:10.0 15.9mag 65P/Gunn 08:01:36.93 +13:23:54.6 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 20:56:46.02 -24:19:23.8 16.5mag 84P/Giclas 10:41:52.76 +13:12:16.2 17.6mag 93P/Lovas 09:06:00.17 +46:21:15.9 16.8mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:54:39.91 +04:52:17.5 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 12:30:32.79 +07:37:30.9 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 23:26:13.76 -00:57:14.7 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 19:44:46.51 +14:53:50.3 10.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 11:16:04.25 -03:26:22.2 16.3mag 169P/NEAT 09:42:20.77 +23:24:44.6 18.0mag 186P/Garradd 03:08:52.81 +02:03:33.1 15.4mag 220P/McNaught 06:22:41.02 +50:05:22.7 15.9mag 260P/McNaught 07:58:23.15 +25:02:34.1 17.5mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Nov 5 01:45 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:58:35.28 +22:20:06.50 ASASSN-26fs 2026-11-2.4 12.31 02:29:41.13 -71:57:55.60 ASASSN-26fr 2026-11-1.22 13.7 21:27:22.43 -18:15:42.10 SN 2026agsu 2026-10-29.85 -1.08 17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92 10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27 21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82 01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9 01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88 00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77 22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42 01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3 18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Nov 5 01:45 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag 05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag 05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Nov 5 01:45 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 22:29:52.275 +18:34:19.42 AT 2026afzp 2026-10-14.36 20.48 02:39:11.125 +17:41:15.14 AT 2026afzo 2026-10-14.38 21.95 02:27:41.006 +23:04:08.87 AT 2026afzn 2026-10-14.38 20.75 23:41:28.246 +15:22:55.44 AT 2026afzm 2026-10-14.42 20.55 05:57:09.596 -21:44:23.09 AT 2026afzl 2026-10-17.60 20.86 06:39:03.694 -23:31:00.11 AT 2026afzk 2026-10-17.61 20.62 00:27:26.818 +29:16:40.85 AT 2026afzj 2026-10-19.27 20.83 18:22:09.520 +25:34:07.56 AT 2026afzi 2026-10-19.22 20.74 22:54:46.804 +38:52:38.17 AT 2026afzh 2026-10-19.25 20.81 22:15:16.031 +35:30:23.42 AT 2026afzg 2026-10-19.24 20.32 01:33:58.403 +22:17:36.22 AT 2026afzf 2026-10-19.32 21.11 00:11:26.192 +27:26:48.54 AT 2026afze 2026-10-19.28 20.29 02:50:45.989 +30:17:57.81 AT 2026afzd 2026-10-19.37 20.98 04:03:41.821 +30:40:43.11 AT 2026afzc 2026-10-19.46 21.47 02:58:55.564 -03:52:08.16 AT 2026afzb 2026-10-19.49 20.93 01:55:10.544 +04:10:57.79 AT 2026afza 2026-10-19.41 20.67 01:01:52.348 +00:04:56.03 AT 2026afyz 2026-10-20.38 21.03 03:32:22.207 +22:40:19.08 AT 2026afyy 2026-10-19.41 20.9 03:38:00.600 -06:45:14.10 AT 2026afyx 2026-10-19.49 21.27 01:28:24.132 +05:07:56.12 AT 2026afyw 2026-10-19.40 20.4 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Nov 5 01:45 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 88 C