######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242 STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=local (lib/catalogs/local_star_catalog -> local copy: Gaia DR2 gaia_source, G < 19.0, built from https://cdn.gea.esac.esa.int/Gaia/gdr2/gaia_source/csv on 2026-11-04) The APASS known-star check of the candidates is disabled (see the note in util/transients/report_transient.sh) WARNING: VizieR is unreachable (no mirror answered the test query) - the online identification of candidates is degraded for this run INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: UMa-09-Q2b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting UMa-09-Q2b1x1 ########### Processing UMa-09-Q2b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 559398 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 559398 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits_preview.png'
UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
renamed 'UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits_preview.png'
UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. Field altitude during imaging: 20.3 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits Field altitude during imaging: 20.5 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 449.0147 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 524.3424 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1336.0311 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 486.3234 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1331.9734 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 486.0270 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.97547 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 10.0600004196167 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 10.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-05T01:06:44.7749862' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T07:06:44.7749862' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.2963515511 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T07:06:54.6799187' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.2964661922 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 143.999999415431 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9998505070512 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 20.3308333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 47.6919444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.85766065408592 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20682 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20682 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 10.0600004196167 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 10.0600004196167 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 83.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.11 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 10.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 12.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.800144 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/d_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits :) Spent 0.602923 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/d_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 10.039999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 10.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-05T01:07:43.7552792' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T07:07:43.7552792' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.2970342012 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T07:07:53.6567427' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.2971487963 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 143.999999322466 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9998505350325 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 20.48 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 47.7761111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.83806171102569 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20682 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20682 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 10.039999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 10.039999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 83.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.11 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 10.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 12.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 1.800144 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.800144 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/d_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits :) Spent 0.666219 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/d_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461349.79646729 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:00.615 +46:00:07.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits Image size: 939.0'x624.3' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:07.243 +46:01:53.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:00.615 +46:00:07.35 Second-epoch image center 09:36:07.243 +46:01:53.47 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0352 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits Image size: 939.0'x624.3' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:05.491 +46:01:25.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:00.615 +46:00:07.35 Second-epoch image center 09:36:05.491 +46:01:25.57 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0259 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:36:07.243 +46:01:53.47 Second-epoch second image center 09:36:05.491 +46:01:25.57 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00926 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.utrNTVIAEN Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DDiTqKoXT4 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jqYaxOUdpK Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DoaKN6u5Oo Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3113 to 155.8121 deg, Dec +39.8601 to +51.4110 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3113 to 155.8121 deg, Dec 39.8601 to 51.4110 deg Loaded 5371 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3775 out of 3982 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3982 out of 8167 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.900200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.900200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.17 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.73 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.73
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3113 to 155.8121 deg, Dec +39.8601 to +51.4110 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3113 to 155.8121 deg, Dec 39.8601 to 51.4110 deg Loaded 5371 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3775 out of 3982 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3982 out of 8167 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=6.1) Read 8217 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3113 to 155.8120 deg, Dec +39.8857 to +51.4193 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3113 to 155.8120 deg, Dec 39.8857 to 51.4193 deg Loaded 5368 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3781 out of 3990 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3990 out of 8217 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (aperture=6.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 2.1 pix UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 2.5 pix fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 15.7 mag. UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 15.0 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits 15.0 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.utrNTVIAEN (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=568, bad_region=1781, passed=8167 Got 8167 stars (including 5926 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6756 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6756 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6756 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4917 stars left (next iteration limit 5409) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=4917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=1548 n_q2=901 n_q3=1628 n_q4=840 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4917 N_valid=4917 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.000 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.277 p95_sep_arcsec=0.776 n_q1=1548 n_q2=901 n_q3=1628 n_q4=840 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.DDiTqKoXT4 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=561, bad_region=1781, passed=8217 Got 8217 stars (including 5974 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8217 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4916 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6817 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6817 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6817 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4916 stars left (next iteration limit 5407) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits N_match=4916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1541 n_q2=890 n_q3=1645 n_q4=840 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4916 N_valid=4916 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.263 p95_sep_arcsec=0.733 n_q1=1541 n_q2=890 n_q3=1645 n_q4=840 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.jqYaxOUdpK (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=280, bad_region=956, passed=5231 Got 5231 stars (including 4035 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5231 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013042 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010433 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3970 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4478 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4478 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4478 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 3970 stars left (next iteration limit 4365) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3970 robust_rms=7.431 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.219 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.219 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3970 robust_rms=0.593 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.670 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.670 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3970 robust_rms=0.369 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.502 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.502 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3970 robust_rms_before=1.214 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.322 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.369 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.467 worst_region_rms_after=0.502 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.240 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.502 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.467 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.467 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.322 arcsec matched=3970 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits N_match=3970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=1296 n_q2=695 n_q3=1345 n_q4=634 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.020 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3970 N_valid=3970 bias_ra_arcsec=0.416 bias_dec_arcsec=0.702 median_sep_arcsec=1.171 p95_sep_arcsec=1.945 n_q1=1296 n_q2=695 n_q3=1345 n_q4=634 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.DoaKN6u5Oo (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=291, bad_region=966, passed=5213 Got 5213 stars (including 3999 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5213 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013042 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010433 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4450 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4450 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4450 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 3933 stars left (next iteration limit 4328) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3933 robust_rms=7.304 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.121 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.121 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3933 robust_rms=0.508 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.692 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.692 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3933 robust_rms=0.355 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.463 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.463 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3933 robust_rms_before=1.063 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.316 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.355 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.464 worst_region_rms_after=0.463 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.189 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.463 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.464 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.464 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.316 arcsec matched=3933 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits N_match=3933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=1276 n_q2=691 n_q3=1332 n_q4=634 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.045 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3933 N_valid=3933 bias_ra_arcsec=0.396 bias_dec_arcsec=0.728 median_sep_arcsec=1.032 p95_sep_arcsec=1.709 n_q1=1276 n_q2=691 n_q3=1332 n_q4=634 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits sigma_overall=0.348 worst_q_ratio=1.271 ref2=UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits sigma_overall=0.325 worst_q_ratio=1.217 new1=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits sigma_overall=0.329 worst_q_ratio=1.020 new2=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits sigma_overall=0.323 worst_q_ratio=1.045 reference average sigma_overall=0.3365 worst_q_ratio=1.244 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332_astrometric_residuals.png (4917 matched stars from wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333_astrometric_residuals.png (4916 matched stars from wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386_astrometric_residuals.png (3970 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387_astrometric_residuals.png (3933 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 09:29:11.88 +43:17:59.8: 10.91 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 09:29:11.88 +43:17:59.8: 10.92 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.92 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:29:11.88 +43:17:59.8: ref_mag=10.92 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4379 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20352_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 20352_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 11 05.29647 2461349.79647 11.51 09:29:11.86 +43:18:00.7 3983 1572 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 11.38 09:29:11.91 +43:17:59.0 3986 1577 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20397_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 20397_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 11.26 09:08:48.07 +42:09:22.4 1661 1056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 09:08:48.05 +42:09:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:00.615 +46:00:07.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits Image size: 939.0'x624.3' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:07.243 +46:01:53.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:00.615 +46:00:07.35 Second-epoch image center 09:36:07.243 +46:01:53.47 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0352 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits Image size: 939.0'x624.3' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:05.491 +46:01:25.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:00.615 +46:00:07.35 Second-epoch image center 09:36:05.491 +46:01:25.57 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0259 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:36:07.243 +46:01:53.47 Second-epoch second image center 09:36:05.491 +46:01:25.57 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00926 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T0FOTH0jzq Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cxpDywpcPo Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oZyusuj463 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RZKxmo6GMo Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0..fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 43830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.1869 to 155.9247 deg, Dec +39.8064 to +51.4126 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.1869 to 155.9247 deg, Dec 39.8064 to 51.4126 deg Loaded 5468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3552 out of 3993 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3993 out of 43830 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.793400 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.793400 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.89 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.90 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.90
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 43830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.1869 to 155.9247 deg, Dec +39.8064 to +51.4126 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.1869 to 155.9247 deg, Dec 39.8064 to 51.4126 deg Loaded 5468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3552 out of 3993 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3993 out of 43830 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 43644 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.2439 to 155.9246 deg, Dec +39.8187 to +51.4195 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.2439 to 155.9246 deg, Dec 39.8187 to 51.4195 deg Loaded 5438 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3552 out of 3999 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3999 out of 43644 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (aperture=4.8) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 61 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 2.0 pix UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.9 mag. UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 15.9 mag. UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 15.1 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits 15.1 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.T0FOTH0jzq (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2151, bad_region=7381, passed=43815 Got 43815 stars (including 34536 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43815 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4915 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38043 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38043 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38043 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4915 stars left (next iteration limit 5406) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=4915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=1535 n_q2=898 n_q3=1648 n_q4=834 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.300 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4915 N_valid=4915 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.265 p95_sep_arcsec=0.751 n_q1=1535 n_q2=898 n_q3=1648 n_q4=834 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.cxpDywpcPo (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2132, bad_region=7360, passed=43635 Got 43635 stars (including 34374 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43635 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37880 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37880 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37880 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1534 n_q2=893 n_q3=1650 n_q4=834 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4911 N_valid=4911 bias_ra_arcsec=0.000 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.256 p95_sep_arcsec=0.736 n_q1=1534 n_q2=893 n_q3=1650 n_q4=834 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.oZyusuj463 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1012, bad_region=3633, passed=27572 Got 27572 stars (including 23069 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27572 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013042 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010433 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24858 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24858 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24858 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4881 stars left (next iteration limit 5369) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=7.381 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.600 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.600 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.591 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.727 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.727 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4881 robust_rms=0.376 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.516 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.516 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4881 robust_rms_before=1.222 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.332 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.376 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.461 worst_region_rms_after=0.516 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.232 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.516 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.461 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.461 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.332 arcsec matched=4881 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits N_match=4881 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=1617 n_q2=823 n_q3=1634 n_q4=807 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.028 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4881 N_valid=4881 bias_ra_arcsec=0.413 bias_dec_arcsec=0.704 median_sep_arcsec=1.179 p95_sep_arcsec=1.941 n_q1=1617 n_q2=823 n_q3=1634 n_q4=807 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.RZKxmo6GMo (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1029, bad_region=3659, passed=27960 Got 27960 stars (including 23413 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27960 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013042 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010433 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25238 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25238 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25238 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5360) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=7.236 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.236 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.236 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.510 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.700 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.700 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.362 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.467 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.467 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4873 robust_rms_before=1.068 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.325 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.362 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.450 worst_region_rms_after=0.467 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.183 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.467 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.450 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.450 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.325 arcsec matched=4873 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=1605 n_q2=829 n_q3=1636 n_q4=803 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.029 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4873 N_valid=4873 bias_ra_arcsec=0.416 bias_dec_arcsec=0.727 median_sep_arcsec=1.037 p95_sep_arcsec=1.703 n_q1=1605 n_q2=829 n_q3=1636 n_q4=803 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits at 08:58:27.63 +47:16:01.5: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits at 08:58:27.63 +47:16:01.5: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:58:27.63 +47:16:01.5: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9266 delta=-0.54 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52410_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52410_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 14.12 09:27:28.75 +46:28:37.4 3903 3505 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 09:27:28.81 +46:28:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52418_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52418_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.29647 2461349.79647 13.89 08:58:27.57 +47:16:00.5 0947 4279 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-06-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.98 08:58:27.68 +47:16:02.4 0950 4284 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52479_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52479_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 11.53 08:59:55.92 +48:25:55.0 1201 4964 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52484_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52484_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 11.58 09:09:06.89 +47:32:24.0 2065 4304 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52487_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52487_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 11.67 09:00:15.02 +46:46:54.1 1093 3964 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52518_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52518_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 12.19 09:04:53.42 +49:28:09.2 1779 5522 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52538_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52538_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 12.32 09:04:37.95 +49:52:11.2 1784 5768 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52539_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52539_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 12.36 09:08:55.83 +47:36:39.5 2051 4349 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52575_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52575_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 12.62 09:00:13.83 +48:04:35.3 1201 4745 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52579_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52579_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 12.65 09:10:03.34 +48:45:13.1 2241 5026 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52590_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52590_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 12.74 08:58:23.38 +47:21:50.7 0951 4343 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52603_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52603_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 12.71 09:04:53.33 +46:24:40.7 1547 3676 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52614_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52614_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 12.78 09:08:22.13 +49:33:26.9 2128 5532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52628_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52628_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 12.89 08:57:54.79 +44:14:07.9 0620 2464 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52629_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52629_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 12.89 08:57:54.96 +44:56:17.1 0684 2888 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52632_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52632_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.00 09:03:03.04 +49:24:01.7 1592 5505 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52640_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52640_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 12.93 08:57:43.68 +47:43:24.5 0915 4570 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52645_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52645_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 12.88 09:03:01.13 +49:05:14.3 1564 5316 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52668_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52668_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.14 09:07:28.11 +48:18:21.3 1951 4786 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52708_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52708_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.24 08:56:26.56 +47:15:48.6 0741 4313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52712_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52712_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.23 09:05:24.31 +48:33:40.7 1762 4966 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 09:05:24.34 +48:33:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52719_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52719_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.16 09:05:10.03 +47:20:16.7 1646 4231 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52721_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52721_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.31 09:05:02.48 +46:54:50.3 1601 3977 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52749_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52749_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.43 09:09:49.66 +47:59:40.0 2168 4570 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52764_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52764_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.25 09:15:34.23 +49:29:28.3 2832 5415 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52819_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52819_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.68 09:01:22.37 +45:01:49.4 1064 2892 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52824_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52824_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.60 08:54:43.13 +48:51:51.4 0716 5307 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52850_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52850_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.68 08:59:33.05 +49:45:43.7 1277 5774 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52866_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52866_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.96 09:29:54.43 +46:11:09.5 4146 3316 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 09:29:54.41 +46:11:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52890_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52890_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.62 08:58:19.03 +47:21:31.8 0943 4341 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52923_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52923_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.99 08:56:03.53 +48:02:39.4 0774 4790 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52936_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52936_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.87 09:43:56.30 +45:51:40.3 5610 3086 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 09:43:56.29 +45:51:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52945_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52945_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 14.01 09:33:43.10 +47:30:49.0 4572 4102 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 09:33:43.12 +47:30:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52951_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52951_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 14.04 09:09:53.30 +49:51:00.3 2297 5692 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 09:09:53.26 +49:51:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52956_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52956_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.90 09:01:44.05 +45:58:34.3 1181 3457 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52958_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52958_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.75 09:44:57.71 +43:14:48.7 5719 1504 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 09:44:57.69 +43:14:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52965_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52965_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.92 09:27:33.16 +42:47:01.0 3788 1273 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 09:27:33.22 +42:47:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52981_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 52981_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=1.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=1.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.98 09:00:38.92 +48:00:43.5 1238 4700 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53000_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 53000_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.84 09:50:21.37 +43:59:02.8 6305 1956 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53018_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 53018_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=2.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 14.00 08:54:47.13 +47:51:02.0 0626 4694 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53025_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 53025_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 14.19 08:55:09.24 +47:34:55.0 0638 4526 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53027_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 53027_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.94 09:14:49.50 +46:38:18.5 2597 3699 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 09:14:49.49 +46:38:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53029_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 53029_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 14.14 08:59:17.65 +48:25:57.3 1137 4974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53037_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 53037_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 14.20 09:02:37.13 +45:39:48.2 1249 3256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53073_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 53073_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 14.26 09:22:31.64 +45:00:53.7 3326 2654 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 09:22:31.62 +45:00:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53088_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 53088_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 14.21 09:10:50.79 +48:38:45.2 2313 4952 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53098_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 53098_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 14.52 09:08:15.29 +49:06:50.8 2086 5265 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53133_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 53133_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 14.65 09:12:01.21 +47:08:35.9 2337 4032 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53152_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 53152_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 14.63 09:02:06.31 +44:32:07.9 1102 2583 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53159_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 53159_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 14.54 09:05:49.15 +48:37:15.7 1808 4997 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53177_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 53177_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 14.38 09:15:23.74 +49:37:14.1 2822 5495 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53184_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 53184_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 14.78 09:17:48.58 +48:10:33.5 2985 4599 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53203_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 53203_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 14.63 08:55:23.48 +49:35:00.1 0851 5731 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53207_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 53207_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 14.57 09:04:07.91 +46:39:30.2 1487 3835 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53218_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 53218_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 14.52 08:56:19.03 +46:44:03.0 0679 3996 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53233_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 53233_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 14.73 08:59:26.89 +46:22:19.2 0974 3729 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53236_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 53236_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 14.68 08:56:57.47 +47:08:26.4 0783 4231 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53242_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 53242_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 14.90 09:02:21.21 +43:19:18.2 1029 1846 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07744_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 07744_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 11.45 09:08:48.10 +42:09:22.6 1661 1056 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 09:08:48.08 +42:09:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 41630_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 41630_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461058.82251: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461058.82304: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 12.84 09:01:12.83 +47:17:45.8 1236 4260 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 13696_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 The candidate 13696_fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461058.82251: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.29715 2461349.79715 13.15 09:35:19.82 +44:07:38.4 4675 2052 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-05_CI_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_011157_TTUQ2b1x1_2844665_pc3bwwlt/fd_UMa-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-05_01-07-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0387.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.3") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-09-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.79646729 -observatory V36 14:33:43.92 -15:13:16.1 Mercury (6.2mag) 13:23:17.12 -12:51:22.6 Venus (-4.5mag) 09:33:21.15 +16:17:45.9 Mars (0.8mag) 09:47:56.94 +14:02:09.5 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:35:59.63 +00:58:12.2 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:08:43.59 +20:49:20.2 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:08:11.59 -00:39:08.4 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:32.71 -23:41:13.4 Pluto (14.5mag) 11:42:09.37 -00:57:53.6 Moon (-9.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Nov 5 01:19 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.79646729: 09:47:50.42 +14:02:47.6 Io (6.0mag) 09:48:06.91 +14:01:11.8 Europa (6.1mag) 09:47:44.34 +14:03:23.5 Ganymede (5.5mag) 09:48:25.40 +13:59:28.6 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:49:32.00 +14:10:22.4 Himalia (15.5mag) 09:47:53.76 +14:02:27.4 Thebe (16.3mag) 09:47:49.60 +14:27:15.0 Elara (17.4mag) 09:48:32.98 +13:30:33.7 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 09:44:51.15 +14:34:21.7 Carme (18.7mag) 00:36:11.74 +00:57:57.2 Titan (8.3mag) 00:35:54.53 +00:58:03.3 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:36:32.64 +00:59:13.7 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:35:55.94 +00:57:41.3 Hyperion (14.2mag) 00:34:12.90 +00:46:07.2 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Nov 5 01:19 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.79646729: 04:41:10.67 +16:51:56.9 JWST 19:14:53.22 -03:27:19.4 Chandra 06:52:08.62 +00:24:47.2 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Nov 5 01:19 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.79646729 -observatory V36 03:32:13.86 +19:54:01.3 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:47:11.78 +38:31:18.7 17.8mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill) 07:47:17.16 +38:31:05.9 17.8mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 07:46:35.36 +38:31:26.4 17.8mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill) 05:01:22.54 +38:46:34.9 17.7mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski) 18:50:12.49 -32:49:08.7 15.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:45:23.00 -74:01:30.2 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:10:58.22 +35:21:35.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 21:43:02.70 +20:29:17.3 17.9mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:35:50.99 +25:20:24.4 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:08:41.74 +38:48:12.8 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:38:17.28 +40:51:28.6 17.5mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:42:24.54 -13:30:45.4 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 14:17:20.98 -04:43:59.5 16.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 20:21:47.51 +51:50:19.4 15.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 13:09:21.13 +17:15:12.6 17.7mag A/2026 E1 15:55:58.58 -66:31:10.4 14.7mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 19:35:55.79 -05:23:38.1 17.1mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS) 10:46:56.95 +02:36:36.6 17.5mag P/2026 U1 (Gafton) 23:24:35.46 +13:33:57.5 16.9mag 2P/Encke 23:28:30.94 -25:14:34.1 15.5mag 10P/Tempel 02:42:12.80 +29:33:22.9 16.5mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:27:19.33 -10:11:14.4 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:10:03.05 -08:59:11.4 15.9mag 65P/Gunn 08:01:36.17 +13:24:00.9 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 20:56:44.34 -24:19:30.8 16.5mag 84P/Giclas 10:41:51.48 +13:12:25.4 17.6mag 93P/Lovas 09:05:56.71 +46:21:01.6 16.8mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:54:37.92 +04:52:42.1 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 12:30:30.70 +07:37:45.2 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 23:26:13.87 -00:57:13.1 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 19:44:48.73 +14:53:34.5 10.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 11:16:02.04 -03:26:11.0 16.3mag 169P/NEAT 09:42:20.34 +23:24:47.4 18.0mag 186P/Garradd 03:08:53.89 +02:03:37.3 15.4mag 220P/McNaught 06:22:41.15 +50:05:11.5 15.9mag 260P/McNaught 07:58:22.10 +25:02:35.0 17.5mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Nov 5 01:19 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:58:35.28 +22:20:06.50 ASASSN-26fs 2026-11-2.4 12.31 02:29:41.13 -71:57:55.60 ASASSN-26fr 2026-11-1.22 13.7 21:27:22.43 -18:15:42.10 SN 2026agsu 2026-10-29.85 -1.08 17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92 10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27 21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82 01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9 01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88 00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77 22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42 01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3 18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Nov 5 01:19 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag 05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag 05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Nov 5 01:19 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 17:53:40.597 +65:17:02.64 AT 2026afyq 2026-09-27.00 27.37 17:54:09.428 +65:16:55.00 AT 2026afyp 2026-09-27.00 26.33 17:53:48.917 +65:14:08.09 AT 2026afyo 2026-09-27.00 28.45 17:54:06.374 +65:12:07.03 AT 2026afyn 2026-09-27.00 27.53 17:54:12.378 +65:11:36.46 AT 2026afym 2026-09-27.00 27.72 17:54:06.270 +65:11:07.40 AT 2026afyl 2026-09-27.00 25.92 17:53:27.005 +65:10:54.26 AT 2026afyk 2026-09-27.00 27.33 17:54:11.180 +65:09:41.88 AT 2026afyj 2026-09-27.00 26.3 17:53:38.059 +65:08:44.42 AT 2026afyi 2026-09-27.00 27.21 17:54:21.568 +65:08:31.22 AT 2026afyh 2026-09-27.00 24.81 17:54:22.489 +65:08:12.98 AT 2026afyg 2026-09-27.00 27.34 17:54:12.363 +65:07:56.68 AT 2026afyf 2026-09-27.00 25.37 17:53:32.198 +65:12:13.26 AT 2026afye 2026-08-07.00 27.52 17:54:17.450 +65:10:55.80 AT 2026afyd 2026-08-07.00 26.19 17:53:34.001 +65:15:33.76 AT 2026afyc 2026-05-27.00 27.28 17:53:39.791 +65:16:43.84 AT 2026afyb 2026-03-28.00 26.7 01:07:23.505 +32:00:53.10 AT 2026afya 2026-10-11.48 20.5 06:56:31.236 +52:33:55.44 AT 2026afxz 2026-10-06.58 20.74 04:59:34.078 -09:52:21.92 AT 2026afxy 2026-10-12.52 19.8 01:14:09.805 -13:39:55.41 AT 2026afxx 2026-10-06.43 19.69 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Nov 5 01:19 tns_transients_list.txt
JD 2461058.82251: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461058.82304: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.79647: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.79715: SE_FLAGS=0.
