Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 11 05.2176  2461349.7176  12.22  23:31:46.44 -08:36:30.9
 73.72655 -63.58392 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 8.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
106 Dione                   -1      0       1  12.3     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:46.44 -08:36:30.9:  15.21 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:46.44 -08:36:30.9:  15.22 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits -crosshair 9085.14160 2587.83838 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits -crosshair 9079.57324 2581.33716 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 11 05.21763 23 31 46.44 -08 36 30.9          12.2 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 11 05.21732 23 31 46.44 -08 36 30.9          12.2 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 11 05.21795 23 31 46.45 -08 36 30.8          12.2 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 11 05.2176*  23 31 46.44 -08 36 30.9  12.2 U             Aqr       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461349.7176,12.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261105.2176 12.22CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 11 05.2176  2461349.7176  13.54  23:52:49.58 -10:05:36.5
 81.11215 -68.06821 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
217 Eudora                  -1     -0       1  13.4     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:49.58 -10:05:36.5:  15.50 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:49.58 -10:05:36.5:  15.53 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits -crosshair 5883.66943 3308.99829 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits -crosshair 5878.03711 3302.63892 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 11 05.21763 23 52 49.58 -10 05 36.5          13.5 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 11 05.21732 23 52 49.55 -10 05 36.3          13.6 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 11 05.21795 23 52 49.62 -10 05 36.6          13.5 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 11 05.2176*  23 52 49.58 -10 05 36.5  13.5 U             Aqr       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461349.7176,13.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261105.2176 13.54CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 11 05.2176  2461349.7176  14.04  00:01:05.80 -08:27:49.6
 88.05350 -67.85878 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 8.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
906 Repsolda                -1      0       1  13.8     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:01:05.80 -08:27:49.6:  15.56 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:01:05.80 -08:27:49.6:  15.57 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits -crosshair 4701.96631 2273.49902 image    wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits -crosshair 4696.35352 2267.04370 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 11 05.21763 00 01 05.80 -08 27 49.6          14.0 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 11 05.21732 00 01 05.76 -08 27 50.0          14.1 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 11 05.21795 00 01 05.83 -08 27 49.2          14.0 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 11 05.2176*  00 01 05.80 -08 27 49.6  14.0 U             Cet       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461349.7176,14.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261105.2176 14.04CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
First image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Last  image: 2461349.71794856 05.11.2026 05:13:40.756   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  5200
Objects passed selection criteria:  5195
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 4848.25
Average stars matched: 4491.25 (92.6365 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   232032 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 16.2.1_p20260926 p1) 16.2.1 20260926
VaST compiled on  Wed Nov  4 18:14:02 CST 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-248-g4e5ec110
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-11-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed Nov  4 23:17:28 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
First image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Last  image: 2461349.71794856 05.11.2026 05:13:40.756   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 56
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  28751
Objects passed selection criteria:  28660
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 26531.5
Average stars matched: 23688 (89.2826 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   250800 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 16.2.1_p20260926 p1) 16.2.1 20260926
VaST compiled on  Wed Nov  4 18:14:02 CST 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-248-g4e5ec110
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-11-04)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed Nov  4 23:18:11 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU
HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=local (lib/catalogs/local_star_catalog -> local copy: Gaia DR2 gaia_source, G < 19.0, built from https://cdn.gea.esac.esa.int/Gaia/gdr2/gaia_source/csv on 2026-11-04)
The APASS known-star check of the candidates is disabled (see the note in util/transients/report_transient.sh)
WARNING: VizieR is unreachable (no mirror answered the test query) - the online identification of candidates is degraded for this run
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 604735 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 604735 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits_preview.png'

Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits


renamed 'Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits_preview.png'

Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
Field altitude during imaging: 42.3 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT)  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Field altitude during imaging: 42.2 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT)  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 765.4159
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 439.5498
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1270.0961
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 538.9550
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1266.5840
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 537.8931
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.65935
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =      14.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 11.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-04T23:12:46.4634387' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T05:12:46.4634387' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61349.2172044329 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T05:12:56.3647050' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =      61349.217319028 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.999795586718 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     -9.9996315282985 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     42.2777777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     207.686666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.48474767140303 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29467 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29467 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =      14.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=      14.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  7.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 76.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               896.61 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 11.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                  1.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             5.800464 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits :)

Spent 0.483930 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =      14.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 11.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-04T23:13:40.7561556' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T05:13:40.7561556' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61349.2178328242 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T05:13:50.6595237' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61349.2179474421 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.999795621859 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -9.99963150578806 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     42.1902777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =             207.9625 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =      1.4872373085209 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29467 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29467 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =      14.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=      14.289999961853 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  7.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 76.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               896.61 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 11.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                  1.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             5.800464 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits :)

Spent 0.487112 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/d_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits



fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461349.71732017
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:14.496 -09:59:16.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:14.496 -09:59:16.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0593 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:12.174 -09:59:52.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:12.174 -09:59:52.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0483 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:00:14.496 -09:59:16.32
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:12.174 -09:59:52.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01392 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kwpTRPGGhu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Hm1sE3BSkw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wuHJIi7pAV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zFc966etpg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.569700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.569700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.95

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.95

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=7.1)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3202 out of 3251 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3251 out of 4358 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.6 pix  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 2.3 pix  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.9 mag.  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 15.0 mag.  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 15.5 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
 15.4 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.4 (SNR )  11.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.kwpTRPGGhu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=0, passed=4374
Got 4374 stars (including 4092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0780, gap 8.0780 to 351.9535
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0777, gap 8.0777 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 3991 stars left (next iteration limit 4390)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=3991 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1080 n_q2=969 n_q3=999 n_q4=943 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3991 N_valid=3991 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.020 bias_dec_arcsec=0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.307 p95_sep_arcsec=1.472 n_q1=1080 n_q2=969 n_q3=999 n_q4=943 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Hm1sE3BSkw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, bad_region=0, passed=4358
Got 4358 stars (including 4088 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0779, gap 8.0779 to 351.9535
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0776, gap 8.0776 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Excluding outliers - 3988 stars left (next iteration limit 4386)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=3988 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1022 n_q2=971 n_q3=1079 n_q4=916 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.078
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3988 N_valid=3988 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.008 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.006 median_sep_arcsec=0.264 p95_sep_arcsec=1.131 n_q1=1022 n_q2=971 n_q3=1079 n_q4=916 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wuHJIi7pAV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=380, bad_region=0, passed=5426
Got 5426 stars (including 5040 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5426 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7417 through 0 to 8.1392, gap 8.1392 to 351.7417
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.4 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7414 through 0 to 8.1395, gap 8.1395 to 351.7414
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.4 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 4879 stars left (next iteration limit 5366)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=13.938 arcsec worst_region_rms=26.689 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=26.689 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.511 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.643 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.643 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.299 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.359 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.275 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4879 robust_rms_before=1.123 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.299 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.299 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.350 worst_region_rms_after=0.359 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.140 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.275
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.350 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.350 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.299 arcsec matched=4879
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits N_match=4879 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=1148 n_q2=1247 n_q3=1220 n_q4=1264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4879 N_valid=4879 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.713 bias_dec_arcsec=0.481 median_sep_arcsec=1.050 p95_sep_arcsec=1.830 n_q1=1148 n_q2=1247 n_q3=1220 n_q4=1264 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zFc966etpg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, bad_region=0, passed=5374
Got 5374 stars (including 4989 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7417 through 0 to 8.1149, gap 8.1149 to 351.7417
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7413 through 0 to 8.1151, gap 8.1151 to 351.7413
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 4859 stars left (next iteration limit 5344)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4859 robust_rms=13.906 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.915 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.915 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4859 robust_rms=0.526 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.638 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.638 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4859 robust_rms=0.309 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.355 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.283 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4859 robust_rms_before=1.153 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.313 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.309 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.340 worst_region_rms_after=0.355 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.135 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.283
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.340 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.340 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.313 arcsec matched=4859
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits N_match=4859 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1121 n_q2=1228 n_q3=1237 n_q4=1273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4859 N_valid=4859 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.725 bias_dec_arcsec=0.478 median_sep_arcsec=1.072 p95_sep_arcsec=1.904 n_q1=1121 n_q2=1228 n_q3=1237 n_q4=1273 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits sigma_overall=0.350 worst_q_ratio=1.109
ref2=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.078
new1=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits sigma_overall=0.307 worst_q_ratio=1.115
new2=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits sigma_overall=0.314 worst_q_ratio=1.079
reference average sigma_overall=0.3205 worst_q_ratio=1.0935
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021_astrometric_residuals.png (3991 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490_astrometric_residuals.png (3988 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208_astrometric_residuals.png (4879 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209_astrometric_residuals.png (4859 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:14:37.61 -07:49:20.8:  11.90 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:14:37.61 -07:49:20.8:  11.89 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:14:37.61 -07:49:20.8: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8692 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20311_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 20311_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    11.88    00:14:37.63 -07:49:20.7   2698 1808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    11.86    00:14:37.60 -07:49:20.9   2693 1802   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00255_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 00255_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    8.77    00:02:07.42 -14:40:33.0   4386 6003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461242.93905: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461243.93528: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

**** FOUND  00:02:07.41 -14:40:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:14.496 -09:59:16.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:14.496 -09:59:16.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0593 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:12.174 -09:59:52.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:12.174 -09:59:52.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0483 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:00:14.496 -09:59:16.32
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:12.174 -09:59:52.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01392 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hinzQGqfJL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RtdShRksUf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zxiXeitx3t
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iGSRZa1KE5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.388800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.388800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.08

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.08

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=5.3)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 23415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4212 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3459 out of 3633 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 23415 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 46 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.4 pix  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 2.2 pix  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 2.0 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
 2.0 pix  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.1 mag.  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
 15.1 mag.  Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
 15.6 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
 15.6 mag.  fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.6 (SNR )  14.2 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.hinzQGqfJL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=913, bad_region=0, passed=22729
Got 22729 stars (including 21779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22729 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9459 through 0 to 8.0985, gap 8.0985 to 351.9459
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9463 through 0 to 8.0982, gap 8.0982 to 351.9463
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5350)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1176 n_q4=1179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4864 N_valid=4864 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.007 median_sep_arcsec=0.320 p95_sep_arcsec=1.370 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1176 n_q4=1179 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.RtdShRksUf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=831, bad_region=0, passed=23408
Got 23408 stars (including 22542 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23408 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9462 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9462
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9465 through 0 to 8.0899, gap 8.0899 to 351.9465
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5346)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1259 n_q2=1185 n_q3=1245 n_q4=1171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4860 N_valid=4860 bias_ra_arcsec=0.000 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.016 median_sep_arcsec=0.269 p95_sep_arcsec=1.063 n_q1=1259 n_q2=1185 n_q3=1245 n_q4=1171 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zxiXeitx3t (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1133, bad_region=46, passed=30420
Got 30420 stars (including 29193 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30420 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7393 through 0 to 8.1522, gap 8.1522 to 351.7393
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.4 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7391 through 0 to 8.1529, gap 8.1529 to 351.7391
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 4848 stars left (next iteration limit 5332)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4848 robust_rms=13.842 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.279 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.279 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4848 robust_rms=0.518 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.665 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.665 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4848 robust_rms=0.300 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.362 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.275 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4848 robust_rms_before=1.119 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.299 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.300 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.349 worst_region_rms_after=0.362 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.134 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.275
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.349 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.349 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.299 arcsec matched=4848
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits N_match=4848 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.283 n_q1=1179 n_q2=1264 n_q3=1194 n_q4=1211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4848 N_valid=4848 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.703 bias_dec_arcsec=0.506 median_sep_arcsec=1.055 p95_sep_arcsec=1.814 n_q1=1179 n_q2=1264 n_q3=1194 n_q4=1211 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.iGSRZa1KE5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1185, bad_region=47, passed=30515
Got 30515 stars (including 29227 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30515 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7304 through 0 to 8.1373, gap 8.1373 to 351.7304
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.7302 through 0 to 8.1378, gap 8.1378 to 351.7302
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4844 robust_rms=13.728 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.167 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.167 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4844 robust_rms=0.534 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.688 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.688 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4844 robust_rms=0.308 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.357 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.279 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4844 robust_rms_before=1.152 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.306 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.308 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.343 worst_region_rms_after=0.357 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.135 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.279
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.343 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.343 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.306 arcsec matched=4844
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.268 n_q1=1182 n_q2=1268 n_q3=1184 n_q4=1210 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4844 N_valid=4844 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.719 bias_dec_arcsec=0.513 median_sep_arcsec=1.083 p95_sep_arcsec=1.895 n_q1=1182 n_q2=1268 n_q3=1184 n_q4=1210 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:47.16 -09:24:31.9:  12.40 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:59:49.53 -08:31:18.0:  13.70 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:42:24.57 -06:00:19.6:  13.61 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:39:00.36 -09:16:52.8:  13.53 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:41.48 -06:46:10.3:  14.03 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:26:57.59 -14:40:51.3:  13.11 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:54:35.20 -07:43:44.4:  12.85 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:06:28.93 -13:25:14.0:  13.72 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:17:28.33 -10:23:31.5:  13.41 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:13:02.65 -05:59:52.1:  13.85 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:41.48 -06:46:10.3:  13.89 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:42:24.57 -06:00:19.6:  13.85 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:47.16 -09:24:31.9:  12.59 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:39:00.36 -09:16:52.8:  13.41 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:13:02.65 -05:59:52.1:  13.99 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:54:35.20 -07:43:44.4:  12.86 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:17:28.33 -10:23:31.5:  13.53 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:59:49.53 -08:31:18.0:  13.94 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:26:57.59 -14:40:51.3:  13.34 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:06:28.93 -13:25:14.0:  14.00 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.95 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.46 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.71 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.91 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.80 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:42:24.57 -06:00:19.6: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2442 delta=-0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:41.48 -06:46:10.3: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2553 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:00.36 -09:16:52.8: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1143 delta=-0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:02.65 -05:59:52.1: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3407 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:35.20 -07:43:44.4: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2495 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:28.33 -10:23:31.5: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0629 delta=-0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:47.16 -09:24:31.9: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0564 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:59:49.53 -08:31:18.0: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2277 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.83 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:57.59 -14:40:51.3: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3081 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:28.93 -13:25:14.0: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1747 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:46.44 -08:36:30.9:  15.21 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:48:06.68 -07:36:48.2:  12.86 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:51:01.60 -05:38:19.9:  12.79 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:01:05.80 -08:27:49.6:  15.56 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:49.58 -10:05:36.5:  15.50 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:30:00.26 -09:52:27.6:  12.45 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:36.15 -10:20:03.5:  13.93 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:29:34.43 -05:21:34.6:  13.73 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:36.25 -07:55:57.2:  11.77 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:48.92 -06:31:08.1:  13.28 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:01:05.80 -08:27:49.6:  15.57 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:51:01.60 -05:38:19.9:  12.97 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:36.15 -10:20:03.5:  13.96 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:49.58 -10:05:36.5:  15.53 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:29:34.43 -05:21:34.6:  13.61 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:51:01.60 -05:38:19.9: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4157 delta=-0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:48:06.68 -07:36:48.2:  13.04 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.95 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:36.15 -10:20:03.5: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9686 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.66 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:06.68 -07:36:48.2: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2994 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:34.43 -05:21:34.6: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8923 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:30:00.26 -09:52:27.6:  12.50 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:48.92 -06:31:08.1:  13.24 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:36.25 -07:55:57.2:  12.08 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:46.44 -08:36:30.9:  15.22 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.26 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:00.26 -09:52:27.6: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8139 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:48.92 -06:31:08.1: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3405 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:36.25 -07:55:57.2: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7041 delta=-0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:10.19 -12:23:26.3:  13.85 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:36:44.13 -05:21:44.4:  14.31 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:26:36.87 -14:52:39.8:  14.12 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:00:47.32 -09:01:10.8:  13.71 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:29:59.00 -14:20:25.9:  14.26 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:19:57.99 -11:38:22.4:  14.28 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:30.27 -08:23:18.8:  14.74 +/- 0.26  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:26:36.87 -14:52:39.8:  14.29 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:10.19 -12:23:26.3:  14.01 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.19 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.92 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:36.87 -14:52:39.8: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9141 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:10.19 -12:23:26.3: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0722 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:29:59.00 -14:20:25.9:  14.25 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:36:44.13 -05:21:44.4:  14.49 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:00:47.32 -09:01:10.8:  13.85 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.25 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.39 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:59.00 -14:20:25.9: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.9720 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:44.13 -05:21:44.4: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2637 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:19:57.99 -11:38:22.4:  14.51 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.77 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:47.32 -09:01:10.8: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0553 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.37 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:19:57.99 -11:38:22.4: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1429 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:30.27 -08:23:18.8:  14.44 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.55 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:30.27 -08:23:18.8: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.2648 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:31:18.30 -12:29:33.7:  15.07 +/- 0.31  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:29:18.93 -14:40:17.3:  14.55 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:25:58.29 -14:07:50.8:  14.49 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:37:54.91 -10:48:25.3:  14.36 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:31:08.02 -14:20:02.7:  15.12 +/- 0.35  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:30:57.05 -14:57:28.7:  14.31 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:17.80 -14:34:28.5:  14.42 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:25:58.29 -14:07:50.8:  14.57 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:37:54.91 -10:48:25.3:  14.37 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:31:18.30 -12:29:33.7:  14.81 +/- 0.24  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:29:18.93 -14:40:17.3:  14.31 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.53 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.36 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:58.29 -14:07:50.8: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2644 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.91 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:54.91 -10:48:25.3: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4010 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.41 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:18.30 -12:29:33.7: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.3326 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:31:08.02 -14:20:02.7:  14.45 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:18.93 -14:40:17.3: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1784 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.60 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:08.02 -14:20:02.7: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.2668 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:17.80 -14:34:28.5:  14.58 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:30:57.05 -14:57:28.7:  15.13 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.49 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:17.80 -14:34:28.5: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2735 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.31 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:57.05 -14:57:28.7: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.2553 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:29:12.62 -14:38:03.1:  14.28 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:26:13.83 -14:49:00.4:  14.72 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:30:28.41 -14:24:27.1:  14.13 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:30:42.91 -13:59:25.9:  14.11 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:28:38.58 -13:42:38.8:  14.12 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:31:00.18 -12:57:12.9:  14.64 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:22:28.10 -13:43:50.4:  14.68 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:26:13.83 -14:49:00.4:  14.33 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:30:28.41 -14:24:27.1:  14.87 +/- 0.32  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.46 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.27 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:13.83 -14:49:00.4: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2744 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:28.41 -14:24:27.1: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2901 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:28:38.58 -13:42:38.8:  14.21 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:30:42.91 -13:59:25.9:  14.44 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:29:12.62 -14:38:03.1:  14.79 +/- 0.26  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.23 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.16 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.43 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:42.91 -13:59:25.9: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0729 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:38.58 -13:42:38.8: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0658 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:12.62 -14:38:03.1: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3486 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:31:00.18 -12:57:12.9:  14.52 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:22:28.10 -13:43:50.4:  14.52 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.57 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:00.18 -12:57:12.9: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3757 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.58 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:28.10 -13:43:50.4: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3933 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:31:15.54 -12:54:57.8:  14.46 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:28:11.61 -14:33:06.1:  14.59 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:31:15.54 -12:54:57.8:  14.26 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.35 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:15.54 -12:54:57.8: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3921 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:28:11.61 -14:33:06.1:  14.62 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.61 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:11.61 -14:33:06.1: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.2959 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32585.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32934.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33159.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32433_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 32433_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.33    00:13:02.65 -05:59:51.8   2972 0713   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.35    00:13:02.66 -05:59:52.5   2966 0707   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=3.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32434_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 32434_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.14    00:06:28.94 -13:25:14.0   3785 5225   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.21    00:06:28.93 -13:25:14.0   3779 5218   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32435_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 32435_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.22    23:59:49.53 -08:31:18.3   4889 2316   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.23    23:59:49.52 -08:31:17.7   4884 2310   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=3.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32436_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 32436_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.14    23:39:00.36 -09:16:51.8   7969 2930   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.10    23:39:00.36 -09:16:53.9   7963 2924   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=3.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32437_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 32437_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.24    23:33:41.47 -06:46:10.2   8867 1454   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.27    23:33:41.49 -06:46:10.5   8862 1448   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=2.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32438_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 32438_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.24    23:42:24.55 -06:00:20.4   7574 0921   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.25    23:42:24.59 -06:00:18.7   7568 0915   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=3.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32439_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 32439_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.06    00:17:28.25 -10:23:30.6   2225 3345   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.06    00:17:28.41 -10:23:32.4   2219 3339   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=3.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32442_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 32442_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    13.55    00:26:57.61 -14:40:51.3   0739 5918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    13.19    00:26:57.57 -14:40:51.4   0733 5912   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=3.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32449_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 32449_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    13.28    23:54:35.23 -07:43:44.1   5691 1874   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    13.22    23:54:35.16 -07:43:44.6   5686 1868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=3.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32452_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 32452_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    13.03    23:56:47.15 -09:24:32.6   5317 2870   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    13.09    23:56:47.16 -09:24:31.2   5311 2863   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=3.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32453_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 32453_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    12.85    00:30:00.26 -09:52:27.9   0350 2983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    12.78    00:30:00.26 -09:52:27.4   0344 2977   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=3.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32455_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 32455_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    12.70    23:43:36.23 -07:55:56.6   7326 2078   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    12.71    23:43:36.28 -07:55:57.8   7321 2072   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=3.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32585_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
Preparing report for the candidate 32585_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32774_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 32774_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    13.24    23:48:06.67 -07:36:48.0   6662 1851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    13.37    23:48:06.69 -07:36:48.3   6656 1845   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=3.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32798_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 32798_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    13.34    23:52:48.90 -06:31:08.2   5992 1157   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    13.34    23:52:48.95 -06:31:08.1   5986 1150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=3.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32826_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 32826_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    13.41    23:51:01.61 -05:38:20.2   6287 0637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    13.42    23:51:01.59 -05:38:19.6   6282 0630   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=3.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32934_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
Preparing report for the candidate 32934_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33075_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33075_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    13.89    00:29:34.47 -05:21:35.1   0470 0233   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    13.89    00:29:34.40 -05:21:34.1   0464 0226   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=3.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33128_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33128_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.01    23:31:36.15 -10:20:03.5   9043 3636   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    13.93    23:31:36.16 -10:20:03.5   9037 3629   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33159_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
Preparing report for the candidate 33159_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33181_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33181_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.05    00:00:47.34 -09:01:11.9   4733 2610   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.06    00:00:47.30 -09:01:09.6   4728 2603   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=3.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33192_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33192_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.06    23:33:10.27 -12:23:26.3   8727 4867   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.09    23:33:10.11 -12:23:26.4   8722 4860   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33218_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33218_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.26    23:36:44.11 -05:21:44.3   8459 0573   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.26    23:36:44.15 -05:21:44.4   8453 0567   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33222_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33222_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    13.96    00:26:36.88 -14:52:40.0   0787 6039   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    13.88    00:26:36.85 -14:52:39.6   0782 6033   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33259_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33259_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.57    23:33:54.42 -06:44:17.2   8830 1427   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33263_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33263_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.02    00:29:58.93 -14:20:25.0   0293 5705   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    13.93    00:29:59.07 -14:20:26.8   0287 5699   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33279_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33279_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.15    00:19:58.02 -11:38:22.9   1831 4088   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.14    00:19:57.96 -11:38:22.0   1825 4082   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=3.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33283_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33283_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.30    23:33:30.32 -08:23:19.2   8831 2439   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.23    23:33:30.21 -08:23:18.4   8826 2432   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33288_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33288_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.09    00:29:18.91 -14:40:16.7   0388 5909   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.33    00:29:18.95 -14:40:17.9   0382 5903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33296_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33296_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.29    00:31:18.35 -12:29:33.4   0119 4574   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.54    00:31:18.25 -12:29:34.0   0114 4567   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33321_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33321_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.31    23:37:54.92 -10:48:25.8   8077 3861   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.58    23:37:54.90 -10:48:24.8   8071 3855   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33335_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33335_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.21    00:31:08.01 -14:20:01.8   0120 5699   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.42    00:31:08.02 -14:20:03.7   0115 5694   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33346_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33346_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.17    00:25:58.29 -14:07:52.4   0895 5584   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.40    00:25:58.29 -14:07:49.2   0889 5577   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33351_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33351_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.49    00:18:35.02 -08:04:11.9   2095 1931   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

**** FOUND  00:18:34.99 -08:04:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33358_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33358_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.27    23:31:17.80 -14:34:28.8   8924 6218   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.28    23:31:17.80 -14:34:28.1   8918 6211   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33366_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33366_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.25    00:30:57.00 -14:57:27.5   0139 6083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.27    00:30:57.10 -14:57:29.9   0133 6077   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33369_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33369_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.20    00:26:13.83 -14:49:01.0   0845 6002   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.41    00:26:13.83 -14:48:59.8   0840 5996   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33382_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33382_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.27    23:30:28.42 -14:24:27.6   9053 6125   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.31    23:30:28.39 -14:24:26.7   9047 6119   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33383_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33383_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.19    00:30:42.87 -13:59:26.1   0188 5490   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    13.99    00:30:42.96 -13:59:25.7   0182 5483   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33403_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33403_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.27    00:29:12.57 -14:38:02.8   0404 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.57    00:29:12.66 -14:38:03.3   0398 5880   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33475_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33475_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.28    00:28:38.60 -13:42:38.5   0502 5322   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    13.95    00:28:38.56 -13:42:39.1   0497 5316   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33485_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33485_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.35    00:22:28.15 -13:43:50.3   1422 5348   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.48    00:22:28.05 -13:43:50.4   1417 5342   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33493_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33493_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.35    00:31:00.27 -12:57:13.8   0159 4856   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.42    00:31:00.10 -12:57:12.1   0154 4849   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33503_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33503_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.38    00:31:15.53 -12:54:57.5   0121 4832   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.40    00:31:15.56 -12:54:58.1   0115 4826   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33526_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33526_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 11 05.21732    2461349.71732    14.30    00:28:11.55 -14:33:06.8   0557 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-12-46_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    14.30    00:28:11.67 -14:33:05.5   0551 5830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01200_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 01200_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 11 05.21795    2461349.71795    8.82    00:02:07.41 -14:40:33.1   4386 6003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_231436_TTUQ1b1x1_715174_kOy4tD7h/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_23-13-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461242.93905: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461243.93528: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71732: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.71795: SE_FLAGS=0.

**** FOUND  00:02:07.41 -14:40:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:31:46.44 -08:36:30.9
23:52:49.58 -10:05:36.5
00:01:05.80 -08:27:49.6
########### Completed Cet-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
23:31:46.44 -08:36:30.9
23:52:49.58 -10:05:36.5
00:01:05.80 -08:27:49.6
###################################################################################
23:31:46.44 -08:36:30.9  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
23:52:49.58 -10:05:36.5  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
00:01:05.80 -08:27:49.6  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.71732017 -observatory V36
14:34:05.57 -15:16:44.0 Mercury (6.3mag)
13:23:20.81 -12:53:06.1 Venus (-4.5mag)
09:33:11.77 +16:18:23.8 Mars (0.8mag)
09:47:54.83 +14:02:19.0 Jupiter (-2.0mag)
00:36:00.69 +00:58:18.0 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:08:44.36 +20:49:22.1 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:08:11.95 -00:39:06.3 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:32.53 -23:41:14.3 Pluto (14.5mag)
11:37:15.98 -00:28:54.9 Moon (-9.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Nov  4 23:17 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.71732017:
09:47:48.41 +14:02:56.7 Io (6.0mag)
09:48:04.04 +14:01:25.5 Europa (6.1mag)
09:47:43.08 +14:03:28.2 Ganymede (5.5mag)
09:48:23.65 +13:59:36.1 Callisto (6.8mag)
09:49:29.57 +14:10:35.2 Himalia (15.5mag)
09:47:53.36 +14:02:27.1 Thebe (16.3mag)
09:47:47.23 +14:27:24.3 Elara (17.4mag)
09:48:31.28 +13:30:41.3 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
09:44:49.36 +14:34:30.5 Carme (18.7mag)
00:36:12.81 +00:58:02.3 Titan (8.3mag)
00:35:55.18 +00:58:10.3 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:36:33.60 +00:59:18.6 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:35:56.66 +00:57:47.4 Hyperion (14.2mag)
00:34:13.96 +00:46:12.8 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Nov  4 23:17 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.71732017:
04:41:16.57 +16:52:10.8 JWST
18:56:19.73 +04:44:07.7 Chandra
06:29:52.07 +14:17:48.5 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Nov  4 23:17 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.71732017 -observatory V36
03:32:17.62 +19:54:08.4 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
07:47:10.45 +38:30:57.3 17.8mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill)
07:47:15.83 +38:30:44.4 17.8mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill)
07:46:34.05 +38:31:04.9 17.8mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill)
05:01:24.18 +38:47:25.6 17.7mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski)
18:50:07.07 -32:49:18.1 15.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:45:22.88 -74:01:12.1 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:10:59.55 +35:21:28.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
21:43:03.59 +20:29:54.0 17.9mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:35:50.71 +25:20:23.8 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:08:41.50 +38:47:30.7 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:38:13.95 +40:51:30.8 17.5mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:42:26.30 -13:30:52.2 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
14:17:15.69 -04:43:37.6 16.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
20:21:29.95 +51:53:32.2 15.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
13:09:16.64 +17:14:31.5 17.7mag A/2026 E1
15:56:09.73 -66:28:38.2 14.7mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
19:35:51.05 -05:23:34.9 17.1mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS)
10:46:50.79 +02:37:18.0 17.5mag P/2026 U1 (Gafton)
23:24:46.36 +13:35:12.9 16.9mag 2P/Encke
23:28:24.94 -25:15:56.2 15.5mag 10P/Tempel
02:42:08.07 +29:35:59.3 16.5mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:27:16.38 -10:10:51.5 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:10:04.64 -08:59:17.5 15.9mag 65P/Gunn
08:01:32.77 +13:24:28.3 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels
20:56:36.99 -24:20:01.5 16.5mag 84P/Giclas
10:41:45.84 +13:13:06.0 17.6mag 93P/Lovas
09:05:41.37 +46:19:58.7 16.8mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
09:54:29.16 +04:54:30.4 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
12:30:21.51 +07:38:48.0 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
23:26:14.35 -00:57:06.1 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
19:44:58.61 +14:52:24.9 10.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
11:15:52.28 -03:25:21.8 16.3mag 169P/NEAT
09:42:18.45 +23:24:59.7 18.0mag 186P/Garradd
03:08:58.65 +02:03:55.6 15.4mag 220P/McNaught
06:22:41.63 +50:04:21.8 15.9mag 260P/McNaught
07:58:17.47 +25:02:38.9 17.5mag 266P/Christensen
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Nov  4 23:17 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
00:58:35.28 +22:20:06.50  ASASSN-26fs  2026-11-2.4 12.31
02:29:41.13 -71:57:55.60  ASASSN-26fr  2026-11-1.22 13.7
21:27:22.43 -18:15:42.10  SN 2026agsu  2026-10-29.85 -1.08
17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70  TCP J17541876-2736362  2026-10-24.76 9.92
10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00  SN2026sqf  2026-10-24.6 13.27
21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90  ASASSN-26fq  2026-10-23.23 14.82
01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90  ASASSN-26fp  2026-10-23.34 12.9
01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10  ASASSN-26fo  2026-10-19.79 -4.88
00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10  SN2026afqd  2026-10-19.36 -0.77
22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60  ASASSN-26fm  2026-10-13.75 14.42
01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30  SN 2026aedl  2026-10-12.33 15.3
18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00  ASASSN-26fn  2026-10-11.74 15.23
21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30  SN2026acyb  2026-10-9.85 16.83
03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70  SN2026acvp  2026-10-9.95 17.75
04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20  SN2026adhl  2026-10-9.94 17.52
09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40  SN2026aeif  2026-10-9.47 15.93
02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90  ASASSN-26fl  2026-10-7.9 -0.85
02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00  SN 2026adfy  2026-10-4.88 16.61
22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70  AT2026adgn  2026-10-4.28 -2.56
15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40  ASASSN-26fj  2026-10-2.06 15.91
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90  ASASSN-26fi  2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20  ASASSN-26fh  2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90  AT2026adfv  2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50  SN2026abhc  2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80  SN2026acxa  2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40  ASASSN-26fg  2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40  SN2026aajs  2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70  AT2026acgs  2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90  ASASSN-26ff  2026-09-16.38 15.41
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20  SN2026yjv  2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30  SN 2026aafh  2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00  SN 2026aaks  2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20  SN2026aasi  2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80  SN2026aafk  2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60  SN2026aafs  2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50  SN2026aagh   -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10  ASASSN-26fe  2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30  SN2026aars  2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50  SN 2026znh  2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80  ASASSN-26fd  2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70  ASASSN-26fc  2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70  SN 2026zfw  2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10  SN2026aacj  2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10  SN2026zji  2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00  SN2026aaiv  2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60  ASASSN-26fb  2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50  AT2026aabo  2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60  SN 2026zhl  2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70  ASASSN-26fa  2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30  AT2026zwp  2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80  V488  2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60  V8055  2026-08-30.22 10.89
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10  ASASSN-26ez  2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00  AT2026zwo  2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90  AT2026zjy  2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50  SN2026ymb  2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30  SN2026yid  2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60  ASASSN-26ey  2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80  ASASSN-26ex  2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Nov  4 23:17 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3  PNV J00425465+4122593  2026-08-25.4712  18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76  PNV J00425038+4118587  2026-09-04.1512  18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4  PNV J00421276+4116284  2026-09-10.9176  18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7  TCP J17520680-2343207  2026-09-08.7896  12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1  PNV J00424094+4115371  2026-09-17.8925  18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8  TCP J08492013-0919158  2026-09-18.4698  13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6  PNV J00421393+4116356  2026-09-22.6597  19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5  TCP J18140158+1513555  2026-09-24.4645  14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5  TCP J00423661+4113505  2026-09-29.7462  17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8  TCP J22034629-1107578  2026-09-29.7438  14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2  TCP J22050206+2049012  2026-10-03.5715  17.13Cmag
00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2  TCP J00381501+4114472  2026-10-08.5978  17.72Cmag
01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4  TCP J01060583+0951204  2026-10-10.8543  14.54Cmag
17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2  TCP J17541876-2736362  2026-10-12.3993  10.8mag
09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2  PNV J09560079+6906152  2026-10-14.9274  19.38Cmag
00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3  PNV J00433083+4126553  2026-10-17.5651  18.61Cmag
04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6  TCP J04573208+3015416  2026-10-17.7818  18.21Cmag
05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3  TCP J05210764+2338213  2026-10-18.4020  10.3mag
05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5  TCP J05341101+2845305  2026-10-18.3604  16.6mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Nov  4 23:17 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
17:53:40.597 +65:17:02.64  AT 2026afyq  2026-09-27.00 27.37
17:54:09.428 +65:16:55.00  AT 2026afyp  2026-09-27.00 26.33
17:53:48.917 +65:14:08.09  AT 2026afyo  2026-09-27.00 28.45
17:54:06.374 +65:12:07.03  AT 2026afyn  2026-09-27.00 27.53
17:54:12.378 +65:11:36.46  AT 2026afym  2026-09-27.00 27.72
17:54:06.270 +65:11:07.40  AT 2026afyl  2026-09-27.00 25.92
17:53:27.005 +65:10:54.26  AT 2026afyk  2026-09-27.00 27.33
17:54:11.180 +65:09:41.88  AT 2026afyj  2026-09-27.00 26.3
17:53:38.059 +65:08:44.42  AT 2026afyi  2026-09-27.00 27.21
17:54:21.568 +65:08:31.22  AT 2026afyh  2026-09-27.00 24.81
17:54:22.489 +65:08:12.98  AT 2026afyg  2026-09-27.00 27.34
17:54:12.363 +65:07:56.68  AT 2026afyf  2026-09-27.00 25.37
17:53:32.198 +65:12:13.26  AT 2026afye  2026-08-07.00 27.52
17:54:17.450 +65:10:55.80  AT 2026afyd  2026-08-07.00 26.19
17:53:34.001 +65:15:33.76  AT 2026afyc  2026-05-27.00 27.28
17:53:39.791 +65:16:43.84  AT 2026afyb  2026-03-28.00 26.7
01:07:23.505 +32:00:53.10  AT 2026afya  2026-10-11.48 20.5
06:56:31.236 +52:33:55.44  AT 2026afxz  2026-10-06.58 20.74
04:59:34.078 -09:52:21.92  AT 2026afxy  2026-10-12.52 19.8
01:14:09.805 -13:39:55.41  AT 2026afxx  2026-10-06.43 19.69
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Nov  4 23:17 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Wed Nov  4 23:15:36 CST 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 22s (0.37 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 6s (0.10 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 35s (0.58 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 7 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 11s (0.18 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 9s (0.15 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 8s (0.13 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 30s (0.50 min)
FIELD_Cet-05-Q1b1x1: 77s (1.28 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 174s (2.90 min)
Finished: Wed Nov  4 23:18:30 CST 2026