######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242 STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=local (lib/catalogs/local_star_catalog -> local copy: Gaia DR2 gaia_source, G < 19.0, built from https://cdn.gea.esac.esa.int/Gaia/gdr2/gaia_source/csv on 2026-11-04) The APASS known-star check of the candidates is disabled (see the note in util/transients/report_transient.sh) WARNING: VizieR is unreachable (no mirror answered the test query) - the online identification of candidates is degraded for this run INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Dra-05-Q2b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Dra-05-Q2b1x1 ########### Processing Dra-05-Q2b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 610320 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 610320 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits_preview.png'
Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
renamed 'Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits_preview.png'
Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. Field altitude during imaging: 31.9 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Field altitude during imaging: 31.8 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 431.0400 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 575.7506 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1103.0624 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 611.0411 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1103.6177 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 610.4101 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.55907 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 11.3000001907349 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 11.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-04T22:56:12.5333775' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T04:56:12.5333775' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.2057006136 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T04:56:22.4336655' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.205815197 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 288.002581748794 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 69.9999622934143 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 31.9194444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 336.303888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.8866847643061 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Dra-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '19 12 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20691 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20691 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 11.3000001907349 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 11.3000001907349 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 77.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.99 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 11.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 358.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.50052 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/d_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits :) Spent 0.614536 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/d_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 11.2799997329712 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 11.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-04T22:57:07.0668315' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T04:57:07.0668315' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.2063317825 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T04:57:16.9673374' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.2064463771 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 288.002581910088 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 69.9999623162117 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 31.8441666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 336.3225 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.8906465074903 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Dra-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '19 12 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20691 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20691 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 11.2799997329712 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 11.2799997329712 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 77.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.99 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 11.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 358.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.50052 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/d_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits :) Spent 0.648618 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/d_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits
fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461349.70581635 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 19:12:05.049 +70:01:39.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Image size: 937.5'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 19:11:48.536 +70:00:14.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 19:12:05.049 +70:01:39.09 Second-epoch image center 19:11:48.536 +70:00:14.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0332 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 19:11:46.816 +70:00:44.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 19:12:05.049 +70:01:39.09 Second-epoch image center 19:11:46.816 +70:00:44.25 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0301 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 19:11:48.536 +70:00:14.80 Second-epoch second image center 19:11:46.816 +70:00:44.25 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00854 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JoBnAPQqAO Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HfmrYzwXTT Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KAm8Tg1w8M Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aiILnd6rN5 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits and wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits and wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits and wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 15402 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 260.2575 to 316.2869 deg, Dec +63.6442 to +75.2942 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 260.2575 to 316.2869 deg, Dec 63.6442 to 75.2942 deg Loaded 13053 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7897 out of 8251 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8251 out of 15402 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.691200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.691200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 15402 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 260.2575 to 316.2869 deg, Dec +63.6442 to +75.2942 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 260.2575 to 316.2869 deg, Dec 63.6442 to 75.2942 deg Loaded 13053 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7897 out of 8251 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8251 out of 15402 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits (aperture=6.1) Read 15513 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 260.2579 to 316.2882 deg, Dec +63.6441 to +75.2969 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 260.2579 to 316.2882 deg, Dec 63.6441 to 75.2969 deg Loaded 13055 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7907 out of 8266 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8266 out of 15513 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits (aperture=6.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits 2.2 pix Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits 2.3 pix fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits 2.3 pix fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits 15.5 mag. Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.JoBnAPQqAO (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=889, bad_region=3680, passed=15395 Got 15395 stars (including 10990 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15395 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12489 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12489 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12489 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.413 n_q1=1563 n_q2=1085 n_q3=1372 n_q4=877 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.090 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4897 N_valid=4897 bias_ra_arcsec=0.009 bias_dec_arcsec=0.006 median_sep_arcsec=0.348 p95_sep_arcsec=1.717 n_q1=1563 n_q2=1085 n_q3=1372 n_q4=877 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits -region wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.HfmrYzwXTT (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=885, bad_region=3629, passed=15513 Got 15513 stars (including 11153 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15513 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12647 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12647 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12647 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.430 n_q1=1569 n_q2=1079 n_q3=1374 n_q4=874 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4896 N_valid=4896 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=0.009 median_sep_arcsec=0.337 p95_sep_arcsec=1.722 n_q1=1569 n_q2=1079 n_q3=1374 n_q4=874 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits -region wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.KAm8Tg1w8M (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=749, bad_region=2337, passed=12913 Got 12913 stars (including 9953 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12913 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11100 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11100 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11100 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4889 stars left (next iteration limit 5377) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=7.154 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.692 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.692 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.414 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.052 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.052 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4889 robust_rms=0.352 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.657 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.657 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4889 robust_rms_before=0.573 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.376 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.352 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.689 worst_region_rms_after=0.657 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.982 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.657 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.689 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.689 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.376 arcsec matched=4889 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits N_match=4889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.406 n_q1=1366 n_q2=802 n_q3=1789 n_q4=932 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.091 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4889 N_valid=4889 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.109 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.284 median_sep_arcsec=0.495 p95_sep_arcsec=1.604 n_q1=1366 n_q2=802 n_q3=1789 n_q4=932 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.aiILnd6rN5 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=767, bad_region=2345, passed=12889 Got 12889 stars (including 9903 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12889 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11055 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11055 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11055 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=7.254 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.263 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.263 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.443 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.100 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.100 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.355 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.643 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.643 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4890 robust_rms_before=0.596 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.364 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.355 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.687 worst_region_rms_after=0.643 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.108 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.643 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.687 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.687 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.364 arcsec matched=4890 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=1366 n_q2=806 n_q3=1788 n_q4=930 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.124 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4890 N_valid=4890 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.092 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.305 median_sep_arcsec=0.515 p95_sep_arcsec=1.663 n_q1=1366 n_q2=806 n_q3=1788 n_q4=930 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.090 ref2=Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.142 new1=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits sigma_overall=0.380 worst_q_ratio=1.091 new2=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.124 reference average sigma_overall=0.378 worst_q_ratio=1.116 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238_astrometric_residuals.png (4897 matched stars from wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252_astrometric_residuals.png (4889 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 18:59:53.42 +70:15:10.9: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:06:45.22 +71:41:45.8: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 18:59:53.42 +70:15:10.9: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:06:45.22 +71:41:45.8: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:53.42 +70:15:10.9: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3499 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:45.22 +71:41:45.8: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3603 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20786_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 20786_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 12.24 19:23:51.39 +66:45:55.0 4073 5144 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 19:23:51.37 +66:45:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21664_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 21664_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 11.07 18:22:01.17 +69:50:10.9 7367 3031 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 18:22:01.17 +69:50:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23014_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 23014_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 12.14 18:34:20.04 +68:40:44.8 6842 3839 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 18:34:20.10 +68:40:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23103_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 23103_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 12.17 18:51:29.78 +70:25:20.2 5814 2902 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 18:51:29.81 +70:25:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23349_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 23349_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 12.36 19:06:45.20 +71:41:45.8 5027 2169 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 12.36 19:06:45.25 +71:41:45.8 5025 2174 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23351_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 23351_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 12.35 18:59:53.40 +70:15:10.8 5396 3028 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 12.35 18:59:53.44 +70:15:10.9 5395 3033 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 05445_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 05445_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 10.27 19:40:57.97 +67:46:05.5 3126 4458 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 19:40:57.97 +67:46:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits Image size: 937.1'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 19:12:05.049 +70:01:39.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Image size: 937.5'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 19:11:48.536 +70:00:14.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 19:12:05.049 +70:01:39.09 Second-epoch image center 19:11:48.536 +70:00:14.80 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0332 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 19:11:46.816 +70:00:44.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 19:12:05.049 +70:01:39.09 Second-epoch image center 19:11:46.816 +70:00:44.25 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0301 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 19:11:48.536 +70:00:14.80 Second-epoch second image center 19:11:46.816 +70:00:44.25 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00854 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fktcJ8r6f9 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RcGITOORYj Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2E6PfNpUHO Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AHEcpTFkxf Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits and wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_
JD 2461202.84134: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461202.84179: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0..fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits and wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits and wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 87306 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 259.8704 to 316.2868 deg, Dec +63.5731 to +75.2954 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 259.8704 to 316.2868 deg, Dec 63.5731 to 75.2954 deg Loaded 13259 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7206 out of 8361 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8361 out of 87306 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.553500 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.553500 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.84 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.71 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.71
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 87306 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 259.8704 to 316.2868 deg, Dec +63.5731 to +75.2954 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 259.8704 to 316.2868 deg, Dec 63.5731 to 75.2954 deg Loaded 13259 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7206 out of 8361 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8361 out of 87306 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits (aperture=4.7) Read 87167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 259.8495 to 316.2882 deg, Dec +63.6400 to +75.3023 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 259.8495 to 316.2882 deg, Dec 63.6400 to 75.3023 deg Loaded 13146 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7230 out of 8373 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8373 out of 87167 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits (aperture=4.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 81 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits 2.1 pix Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits 2.2 pix fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits 2.3 pix fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits 15.7 mag. Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits 15.4 mag. fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits 15.4 mag. fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.fktcJ8r6f9 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=6474, bad_region=14130, passed=87289 Got 87289 stars (including 68116 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 87289 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76747 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76747 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76747 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.415 n_q1=1549 n_q2=1051 n_q3=1436 n_q4=873 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4909 N_valid=4909 bias_ra_arcsec=0.013 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.340 p95_sep_arcsec=1.717 n_q1=1549 n_q2=1051 n_q3=1436 n_q4=873 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits -region wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.RcGITOORYj (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=6408, bad_region=13846, passed=87157 Got 87157 stars (including 68236 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 87157 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76812 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76812 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76812 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.419 n_q1=1559 n_q2=1045 n_q3=1431 n_q4=874 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4909 N_valid=4909 bias_ra_arcsec=0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.335 p95_sep_arcsec=1.696 n_q1=1559 n_q2=1045 n_q3=1431 n_q4=874 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits -region wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.2E6PfNpUHO (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=5349, bad_region=9074, passed=74244 Got 74244 stars (including 60827 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74244 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67469 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67469 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67469 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=7.124 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.656 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.656 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=0.411 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.130 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.130 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4900 robust_rms=0.351 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.675 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.675 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4900 robust_rms_before=0.572 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.364 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.351 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.724 worst_region_rms_after=0.675 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.039 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.675 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.724 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.724 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.364 arcsec matched=4900 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=1393 n_q2=793 n_q3=1768 n_q4=946 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4900 N_valid=4900 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.102 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.267 median_sep_arcsec=0.488 p95_sep_arcsec=1.592 n_q1=1393 n_q2=793 n_q3=1768 n_q4=946 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.AHEcpTFkxf (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=5188, bad_region=9021, passed=73613 Got 73613 stars (including 60338 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73613 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66911 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66911 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66911 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=7.209 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.434 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.434 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.442 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.189 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.189 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.352 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.676 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.676 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4898 robust_rms_before=0.594 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.360 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.352 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.719 worst_region_rms_after=0.676 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.133 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.676 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.719 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.719 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.360 arcsec matched=4898 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=1395 n_q2=804 n_q3=1763 n_q4=936 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4898 N_valid=4898 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.093 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.292 median_sep_arcsec=0.512 p95_sep_arcsec=1.663 n_q1=1395 n_q2=804 n_q3=1763 n_q4=936 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/wcs_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:57:03.61 +71:49:03.7: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:42:26.71 +66:46:12.5: 14.16 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:24:46.04 +72:43:16.7: 15.03 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 20:09:38.49 +71:38:04.4: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:49:15.63 +70:24:41.2: 14.46 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:52:02.40 +67:23:46.8: 14.44 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 20:06:27.85 +71:46:25.4: 14.31 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:22:04.25 +69:54:29.1: 14.48 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:27:35.43 +71:22:43.7: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:46:56.45 +67:26:43.7: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:24:46.04 +72:43:16.7: 15.11 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:24:46.04 +72:43:16.7: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9706 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:57:03.61 +71:49:03.7: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:42:26.71 +66:46:12.5: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 20:09:38.49 +71:38:04.4: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:03.61 +71:49:03.7: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5913 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:22:04.25 +69:54:29.1: 14.61 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 20:06:27.85 +71:46:25.4: 14.52 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:42:26.71 +66:46:12.5: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3942 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:38.49 +71:38:04.4: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5844 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:52:02.40 +67:23:46.8: 14.53 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:49:15.63 +70:24:41.2: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:27:35.43 +71:22:43.7: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:22:04.25 +69:54:29.1: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.8560 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:27.85 +71:46:25.4: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4346 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:02.40 +67:23:46.8: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5930 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:49:15.63 +70:24:41.2: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6762 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:35.43 +71:22:43.7: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4484 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:46:56.45 +67:26:43.7: 14.54 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:56.45 +67:26:43.7: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5614 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:57:10.75 +66:53:33.1: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:56:27.64 +70:15:20.3: 14.45 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:54:34.57 +66:41:44.7: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:27:35.28 +67:53:40.5: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 18:55:52.73 +73:29:15.4: 14.31 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:43:47.39 +65:42:12.8: 14.43 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:28:47.11 +67:01:36.3: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:49:46.56 +69:03:41.4: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 20:03:37.66 +73:38:27.8: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:54:34.57 +66:41:44.7: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:57:10.75 +66:53:33.1: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:34.57 +66:41:44.7: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2072 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:43:47.39 +65:42:12.8: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:27:35.28 +67:53:40.5: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:56:27.64 +70:15:20.3: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:10.75 +66:53:33.1: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4051 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 18:55:52.73 +73:29:15.4: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:47.39 +65:42:12.8: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4083 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:49:46.56 +69:03:41.4: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:27.64 +70:15:20.3: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5993 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:35.28 +67:53:40.5: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0150 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:28:47.11 +67:01:36.3: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:55:52.73 +73:29:15.4: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0932 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 20:03:37.66 +73:38:27.8: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:49:46.56 +69:03:41.4: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1754 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:47.11 +67:01:36.3: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3916 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:37.66 +73:38:27.8: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0949 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:43:12.53 +65:47:04.0: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:46:57.16 +66:30:14.5: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:41:54.53 +66:29:42.1: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:45:47.83 +66:25:13.9: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:43:50.62 +71:12:31.3: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:43:12.53 +65:47:04.0: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:12.53 +65:47:04.0: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0201 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:32:29.00 +71:48:39.9: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:46:57.16 +66:30:14.5: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:57.16 +66:30:14.5: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7263 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:45:47.83 +66:25:13.9: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:43:50.62 +71:12:31.3: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:41:54.53 +66:29:42.1: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:47.83 +66:25:13.9: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2748 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:50.62 +71:12:31.3: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3499 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:54.53 +66:29:42.1: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9413 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:32:29.00 +71:48:39.9: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:29.00 +71:48:39.9: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9399 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 20:10:43.67 +72:07:49.7: 14.91 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:44:18.45 +69:15:52.6: 14.43 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:27:54.02 +73:47:27.7: 14.76 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:43:04.74 +67:39:20.1: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:51:17.06 +66:46:13.1: 14.25 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:53:02.36 +65:30:36.0: 14.91 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 20:13:35.87 +73:25:29.8: 15.21 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:56:30.36 +72:02:31.9: 14.88 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 20:10:43.67 +72:07:49.7: 14.60 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:43.67 +72:07:49.7: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4828 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:44:18.45 +69:15:52.6: 14.53 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:27:54.02 +73:47:27.7: 14.76 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:18.45 +69:15:52.6: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5025 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:54.02 +73:47:27.7: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4063 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 20:13:35.87 +73:25:29.8: 14.81 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:43:04.74 +67:39:20.1: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:53:02.36 +65:30:36.0: 15.24 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:51:17.06 +66:46:13.1: 14.51 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:56:30.36 +72:02:31.9: 15.15 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:13:35.87 +73:25:29.8: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7831 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:43:04.74 +67:39:20.1: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5235 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:02.36 +65:30:36.0: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7406 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:17.06 +66:46:13.1: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4893 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:30.36 +72:02:31.9: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6223 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:28:55.10 +73:36:11.1: 15.02 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 20:12:23.57 +73:36:22.5: 14.84 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:52:23.98 +73:41:04.3: 14.78 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:28:55.10 +73:36:11.1: 14.87 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:55.10 +73:36:11.1: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7768 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 20:12:23.57 +73:36:22.5: 15.26 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:23.57 +73:36:22.5: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7574 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:56:33.15 +73:23:18.4: 15.29 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 20:07:44.71 +71:40:24.6: 15.14 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:51:51.85 +67:04:32.8: 14.99 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:46:12.29 +69:49:13.2: 15.26 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:22:16.07 +69:36:32.9: 14.94 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 20:06:00.33 +70:41:03.3: 15.08 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:46:13.61 +72:13:01.2: 14.95 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:52:23.98 +73:41:04.3: 14.98 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:23.98 +73:41:04.3: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8417 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:56:33.15 +73:23:18.4: 15.06 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:33.15 +73:23:18.4: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7733 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 20:07:44.71 +71:40:24.6: 15.31 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:07:44.71 +71:40:24.6: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8943 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:46:12.29 +69:49:13.2: 15.30 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:51:51.85 +67:04:32.8: 15.16 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:12.29 +69:49:13.2: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9144 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:46:13.61 +72:13:01.2: 14.98 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:51.85 +67:04:32.8: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8840 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 20:06:00.33 +70:41:03.3: 15.06 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:13.61 +72:13:01.2: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7120 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:22:16.07 +69:36:32.9: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:00.33 +70:41:03.3: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9267 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:22:16.07 +69:36:32.9: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8075 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:26:47.68 +73:26:55.3: 15.03 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:45:35.32 +65:56:43.4: 14.99 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:46:01.62 +71:14:45.1: 15.38 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:26:47.68 +73:26:55.3: 15.06 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:47.68 +73:26:55.3: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9067 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:45:35.32 +65:56:43.4: 15.12 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:35.32 +65:56:43.4: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7782 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 20:01:28.81 +69:28:39.8: 14.79 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-11-22_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0238.fits at 19:39:56.17 +66:32:46.3: 15.09 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:46:01.62 +71:14:45.1: 15.11 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:01.62 +71:14:45.1: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9532 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 20:01:28.81 +69:28:39.8: 15.13 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:01:28.81 +69:28:39.8: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9782 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-11_03-12-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 19:39:56.17 +66:32:46.3: 15.25 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:56.17 +66:32:46.3: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0368 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103357_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103357_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.92 19:24:46.30 +72:43:16.6 4204 1537 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 15.04 19:24:45.79 +72:43:16.8 4202 1542 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103367_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103367_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.86 19:22:04.29 +69:54:30.0 4257 3243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.85 19:22:04.21 +69:54:28.2 4256 3248 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103374_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103374_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.55 18:30:09.32 +70:43:11.0 6856 2584 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103379_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103379_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.78 19:57:03.62 +71:49:03.0 2661 1903 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.50 19:57:03.60 +71:49:04.5 2660 1908 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103394_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103394_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.68 19:49:15.48 +70:24:40.8 2897 2808 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.67 19:49:15.77 +70:24:41.6 2896 2813 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103407_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103407_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=1.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=1.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.49 19:27:35.46 +71:22:43.5 4026 2341 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.41 19:27:35.40 +71:22:43.9 4025 2346 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103413_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103413_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.52 20:06:27.93 +71:46:26.8 2218 1838 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.37 20:06:27.76 +71:46:24.1 2216 1844 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103414_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103414_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=2.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.49 19:42:26.73 +66:46:13.1 2968 5045 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.33 19:42:26.68 +66:46:11.9 2967 5050 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103415_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103415_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=2.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.59 20:09:38.52 +71:38:03.5 2051 1886 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.58 20:09:38.46 +71:38:05.3 2049 1891 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103416_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103416_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.60 19:52:02.43 +67:23:47.2 2461 4589 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.59 19:52:02.36 +67:23:46.3 2459 4594 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103418_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103418_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=2.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.51 19:46:56.47 +67:26:43.7 2759 4604 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.63 19:46:56.43 +67:26:43.8 2758 4609 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103420_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103420_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=2.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.51 19:56:27.67 +70:15:20.2 2519 2840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.79 19:56:27.61 +70:15:20.4 2517 2845 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103422_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103422_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.43 19:28:47.16 +67:01:37.1 3792 4965 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.36 19:28:47.07 +67:01:35.5 3790 4970 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103425_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103425_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.42 19:43:47.62 +65:42:13.6 2804 5679 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.40 19:43:47.15 +65:42:12.0 2803 5684 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103430_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103430_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.40 19:57:10.73 +66:53:32.5 2108 4840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.41 19:57:10.77 +66:53:33.6 2107 4845 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103436_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103436_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.23 19:37:05.42 +65:54:21.3 3232 5608 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 19:37:05.34 +65:54:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103440_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103440_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.20 19:54:34.59 +66:41:44.1 2241 4985 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.21 19:54:34.55 +66:41:45.3 2239 4990 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103441_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103441_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.10 18:55:52.75 +73:29:15.6 5469 1062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.08 18:55:52.71 +73:29:15.1 5468 1067 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103443_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103443_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.18 19:49:46.43 +69:03:41.5 2746 3611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.17 19:49:46.68 +69:03:41.3 2745 3617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103444_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103444_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.02 19:27:35.37 +67:53:40.7 3895 4444 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.01 19:27:35.19 +67:53:40.3 3894 4449 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103447_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103447_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.06 20:03:37.60 +73:38:27.9 2586 0757 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.15 20:03:37.72 +73:38:27.7 2584 0762 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103450_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103450_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.17 19:49:03.96 +66:23:56.9 2540 5221 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 19:49:03.89 +66:23:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103451_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103451_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.07 19:28:29.29 +68:31:52.4 3868 4061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 19:28:29.37 +68:31:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103452_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103452_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 13.99 19:43:12.34 +65:47:03.2 2847 5635 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.05 19:43:12.73 +65:47:04.7 2845 5640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103454_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103454_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 13.83 19:43:38.76 +69:53:40.6 3138 3163 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 19:43:38.67 +69:53:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103458_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103458_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 13.74 19:13:46.70 +67:34:03.7 4677 4673 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 19:13:46.77 +67:34:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103460_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103460_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 13.69 18:56:17.15 +69:41:41.7 5601 3359 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 18:56:16.99 +69:41:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103461_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103461_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 13.74 19:46:57.19 +66:30:14.1 2677 5170 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 13.71 19:46:57.13 +66:30:14.9 2676 5175 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103462_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103462_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=2.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 13.58 19:57:38.78 +68:09:21.1 2222 4085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 19:57:38.66 +68:09:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103463_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103463_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 13.34 19:43:50.67 +71:12:31.2 3232 2368 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 13.36 19:43:50.56 +71:12:31.4 3230 2373 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103464_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103464_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 13.31 19:45:47.88 +66:25:13.8 2740 5230 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 13.24 19:45:47.79 +66:25:14.0 2738 5235 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103467_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103467_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 12.91 19:41:54.63 +66:29:42.1 2980 5215 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 13.00 19:41:54.44 +66:29:42.1 2978 5220 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103470_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103470_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 12.35 19:58:33.97 +72:13:57.0 2637 1648 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 19:58:33.87 +72:13:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 103471_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 103471_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 12.12 19:44:34.44 +66:50:11.1 2846 4994 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 19:44:34.39 +66:50:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 106099_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 106099_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 12.26 18:36:29.19 +66:09:13.7 6950 5374 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 107616_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 107616_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 12.94 19:32:29.05 +71:48:40.7 3812 2063 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 12.94 19:32:28.94 +71:48:39.1 3811 2068 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 108145_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 108145_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 13.01 18:37:20.36 +67:21:13.7 6793 4659 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 108493_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 108493_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 12.93 18:22:18.43 +69:27:50.0 7398 3255 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 109398_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 109398_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 13.43 19:11:19.99 +66:59:45.0 4820 5020 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 19:11:20.04 +66:59:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 110414_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 110414_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 13.69 19:50:04.33 +68:57:43.5 2720 3674 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 19:50:04.39 +68:57:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 110709_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 110709_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 13.66 19:44:24.34 +71:20:43.0 3214 2287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 19:44:24.41 +71:20:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 111418_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 111418_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 13.81 18:48:45.76 +72:25:36.9 5835 1681 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 18:48:45.86 +72:25:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 111702_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 111702_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=1.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=1.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 13.70 18:30:59.81 +67:14:33.4 7171 4669 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 112110_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 112110_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 13.77 18:59:46.99 +66:27:54.2 5519 5323 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 18:59:47.00 +66:27:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 114723_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 114723_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.10 18:21:16.44 +69:44:53.7 7416 3075 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 115153_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 115153_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.42 20:10:43.68 +72:07:49.8 2071 1580 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.57 20:10:43.66 +72:07:49.7 2070 1586 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 115564_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 115564_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.17 18:24:30.99 +68:36:25.6 7384 3788 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 115616_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 115616_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.50 19:44:18.56 +69:15:52.7 3056 3531 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.51 19:44:18.34 +69:15:52.5 3054 3536 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 115811_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 115811_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.51 19:51:17.05 +66:46:13.0 2444 4972 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.47 19:51:17.08 +66:46:13.2 2442 4977 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 116000_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 116000_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.40 19:27:53.99 +73:47:28.2 4104 0880 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.41 19:27:54.05 +73:47:27.3 4103 0886 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 116151_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 116151_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.52 19:43:04.67 +67:39:19.0 2998 4507 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.52 19:43:04.81 +67:39:21.1 2997 4512 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 116713_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 116713_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=1.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.58 19:56:30.16 +72:02:32.0 2712 1774 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.68 19:56:30.56 +72:02:31.8 2710 1779 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117168_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 117168_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.72 19:53:02.39 +65:30:35.7 2211 5714 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.76 19:53:02.32 +65:30:36.3 2210 5719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117376_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 117376_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.68 20:13:35.90 +73:25:30.5 2136 0784 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.95 20:13:35.84 +73:25:29.2 2135 0789 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117387_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 117387_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.77 18:26:07.89 +68:50:01.2 7270 3670 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117483_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 117483_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.69 20:11:02.52 +72:10:31.0 2062 1556 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 117508_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 117508_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.66 18:38:22.37 +66:07:56.2 6837 5403 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118023_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 118023_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.71 19:28:55.04 +73:36:11.0 4054 0992 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.90 19:28:55.15 +73:36:11.1 4052 0997 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118211_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 118211_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.75 20:12:24.07 +73:36:22.4 2214 0690 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.76 20:12:23.06 +73:36:22.7 2213 0695 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118223_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 118223_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.73 19:52:23.65 +73:41:05.3 3063 0823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 15.04 19:52:24.31 +73:41:03.2 3061 0828 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118244_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 118244_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.77 19:22:16.07 +69:36:31.8 4240 3423 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.89 19:22:16.06 +69:36:33.9 4238 3428 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118505_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 118505_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.77 19:56:33.15 +73:23:18.7 2856 0969 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.78 19:56:33.15 +73:23:18.1 2855 0974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118553_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 118553_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.86 20:06:00.13 +70:41:04.3 2095 2488 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 15.05 20:06:00.53 +70:41:02.3 2093 2494 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118588_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 118588_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.77 19:46:13.77 +72:13:02.5 3201 1747 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.67 19:46:13.45 +72:13:00.0 3199 1752 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118756_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 118756_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.88 20:07:44.70 +71:40:24.3 2145 1884 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.92 20:07:44.71 +71:40:24.9 2143 1889 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118768_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 118768_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.87 19:46:12.34 +69:49:13.1 3001 3184 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.99 19:46:12.23 +69:49:13.3 3000 3189 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118868_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 118868_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.88 19:51:51.73 +67:04:33.0 2439 4783 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.89 19:51:51.98 +67:04:32.5 2438 4788 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 118875_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 118875_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.91 19:26:47.61 +73:26:53.9 4139 1091 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.91 19:26:47.75 +73:26:56.7 4137 1096 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 119160_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 119160_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.89 19:45:35.20 +65:56:44.3 2713 5519 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 14.71 19:45:35.44 +65:56:42.5 2711 5524 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 119224_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 119224_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.91 19:46:01.58 +71:14:46.4 3129 2331 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 15.03 19:46:01.66 +71:14:43.9 3128 2336 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 119314_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 119314_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.96 20:01:28.90 +69:28:39.2 2171 3253 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 15.00 20:01:28.72 +69:28:40.5 2170 3258 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 119427_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 119427_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.20582 2461349.70582 14.95 19:39:56.21 +66:32:45.7 3102 5197 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-56-12_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0252.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 15.21 19:39:56.14 +66:32:46.9 3100 5202 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 120247_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 120247_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 15.06 18:52:48.10 +71:27:04.1 5698 2287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 120384_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 120384_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 15.00 18:27:28.54 +70:27:40.1 7017 2714 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 49207_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 49207_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 11.07 18:22:01.26 +69:50:10.7 7367 3031 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 18:22:01.26 +69:50:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52348_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 52348_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461202.84134: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461202.84179: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 13.24 19:10:34.28 +70:33:11.1 4849 2868 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 10616_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 10616_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461202.84134: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461202.84179: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 12.39 19:22:29.69 +65:55:00.2 4133 5663 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 28890_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 28890_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461202.84134: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461202.84179: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 10.46 19:40:57.94 +67:46:05.6 3126 4458 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 19:40:57.96 +67:46:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 37528_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 37528_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461202.84134: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461202.84179: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 12.15 18:34:20.05 +68:40:44.6 6841 3839 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 18:34:20.10 +68:40:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21260_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 21260_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461202.84134: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461202.84179: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=2.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 13.54 19:53:28.79 +66:40:25.9 2302 5014 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 19:53:29.03 +66:40:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54148_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 The candidate 54148_fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461202.84134: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=2.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.20645 2461349.70645 13.17 18:22:10.82 +70:25:43.1 7285 2681 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_225957_TTUQ2b1x1_3290204_vP5n4SoV/fd_Dra-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_22-57-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0253.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Dra-05-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.70581635 -observatory V36 14:34:08.73 -15:17:14.3 Mercury (6.3mag) 13:23:21.35 -12:53:21.3 Venus (-4.5mag) 09:33:10.40 +16:18:29.4 Mars (0.8mag) 09:47:54.53 +14:02:20.4 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:36:00.85 +00:58:18.9 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:08:44.47 +20:49:22.4 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:08:12.00 -00:39:06.0 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:32.51 -23:41:14.4 Pluto (14.5mag) 11:36:31.44 -00:24:43.6 Moon (-9.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Nov 4 23:02 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.70581635: 09:47:48.16 +14:02:57.7 Io (6.0mag) 09:48:03.60 +14:01:27.6 Europa (6.1mag) 09:47:42.90 +14:03:28.8 Ganymede (5.5mag) 09:48:23.39 +13:59:37.2 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:49:29.22 +14:10:37.0 Himalia (15.5mag) 09:47:53.40 +14:02:26.5 Thebe (16.3mag) 09:47:46.88 +14:27:25.7 Elara (17.4mag) 09:48:31.03 +13:30:42.4 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 09:44:49.10 +14:34:31.8 Carme (18.7mag) 00:36:12.96 +00:58:03.0 Titan (8.3mag) 00:35:55.28 +00:58:11.3 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:36:33.74 +00:59:19.4 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:35:56.76 +00:57:48.3 Hyperion (14.2mag) 00:34:14.11 +00:46:13.6 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Nov 4 23:02 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.70581635: 04:41:16.74 +16:52:09.8 JWST 18:54:16.41 +05:44:23.7 Chandra 06:25:36.50 +16:35:49.5 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Nov 4 23:02 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.70581635 -observatory V36 03:32:18.17 +19:54:09.4 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:47:10.25 +38:30:54.1 17.8mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill) 07:47:15.63 +38:30:41.3 17.8mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 07:46:33.85 +38:31:01.8 17.8mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill) 05:01:24.41 +38:47:33.0 17.7mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski) 18:50:06.28 -32:49:19.4 15.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:45:22.86 -74:01:09.4 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:10:59.74 +35:21:26.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 21:43:03.72 +20:29:59.3 17.9mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:35:50.67 +25:20:23.8 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:08:41.46 +38:47:24.5 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:38:13.47 +40:51:31.1 17.5mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:42:26.55 -13:30:53.2 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 14:17:14.92 -04:43:34.4 16.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 20:21:27.40 +51:54:00.1 15.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 13:09:15.99 +17:14:25.6 17.7mag A/2026 E1 15:56:11.37 -66:28:16.1 14.7mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 19:35:50.36 -05:23:34.4 17.1mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS) 10:46:49.89 +02:37:24.0 17.5mag P/2026 U1 (Gafton) 23:24:47.95 +13:35:23.8 16.9mag 2P/Encke 23:28:24.07 -25:16:08.1 15.5mag 10P/Tempel 02:42:07.38 +29:36:21.9 16.5mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:27:15.95 -10:10:48.2 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:10:04.87 -08:59:18.4 15.9mag 65P/Gunn 08:01:32.27 +13:24:32.3 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 20:56:35.93 -24:20:06.0 16.5mag 84P/Giclas 10:41:45.02 +13:13:11.9 17.6mag 93P/Lovas 09:05:39.13 +46:19:49.6 16.8mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:54:27.88 +04:54:46.1 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 12:30:20.18 +07:38:57.2 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 23:26:14.43 -00:57:05.1 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 19:45:00.06 +14:52:14.8 10.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 11:15:50.86 -03:25:14.6 16.3mag 169P/NEAT 09:42:18.17 +23:25:01.5 18.0mag 186P/Garradd 03:08:59.34 +02:03:58.2 15.4mag 220P/McNaught 06:22:41.68 +50:04:14.5 15.9mag 260P/McNaught 07:58:16.79 +25:02:39.5 17.5mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Nov 4 23:02 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:58:35.28 +22:20:06.50 ASASSN-26fs 2026-11-2.4 12.31 02:29:41.13 -71:57:55.60 ASASSN-26fr 2026-11-1.22 13.7 21:27:22.43 -18:15:42.10 SN 2026agsu 2026-10-29.85 -1.08 17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92 10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27 21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82 01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9 01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88 00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77 22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42 01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3 18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Nov 4 23:02 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag 05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag 05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Nov 4 23:02 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 17:54:06.374 +65:12:07.03 AT 2026afyn 2026-09-27.00 27.53 17:54:12.378 +65:11:36.46 AT 2026afym 2026-09-27.00 27.72 17:54:06.270 +65:11:07.40 AT 2026afyl 2026-09-27.00 25.92 17:53:27.005 +65:10:54.26 AT 2026afyk 2026-09-27.00 27.33 17:54:11.180 +65:09:41.88 AT 2026afyj 2026-09-27.00 26.3 17:53:38.059 +65:08:44.42 AT 2026afyi 2026-09-27.00 27.21 17:54:21.568 +65:08:31.22 AT 2026afyh 2026-09-27.00 24.81 17:54:22.489 +65:08:12.98 AT 2026afyg 2026-09-27.00 27.34 17:54:12.363 +65:07:56.68 AT 2026afyf 2026-09-27.00 25.37 17:53:32.198 +65:12:13.26 AT 2026afye 2026-08-07.00 27.52 17:54:17.450 +65:10:55.80 AT 2026afyd 2026-08-07.00 26.19 17:53:34.001 +65:15:33.76 AT 2026afyc 2026-05-27.00 27.28 17:53:39.791 +65:16:43.84 AT 2026afyb 2026-03-28.00 26.7 01:07:23.505 +32:00:53.10 AT 2026afya 2026-10-11.48 20.5 06:56:31.236 +52:33:55.44 AT 2026afxz 2026-10-06.58 20.74 04:59:34.078 -09:52:21.92 AT 2026afxy 2026-10-12.52 19.8 01:14:09.805 -13:39:55.41 AT 2026afxx 2026-10-06.43 19.69 03:41:26.334 -01:30:43.79 AT 2026afxw 2026-10-19.42 20.5509 08:32:00.397 +26:40:21.34 AT 2026afxv 2026-10-16.45 19.9231 10:01:37.234 +18:45:25.97 AT 2026afxu 2026-10-20.53 19.8573 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Nov 4 23:02 tns_transients_list.txt
JD 2461202.84134: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461202.84179: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70582: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.70645: SE_FLAGS=0.
