######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242 STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=local (lib/catalogs/local_star_catalog -> local copy: Gaia DR2 gaia_source, G < 19.0, built from https://cdn.gea.esac.esa.int/Gaia/gdr2/gaia_source/csv on 2026-11-04) The APASS known-star check of the candidates is disabled (see the note in util/transients/report_transient.sh) WARNING: VizieR is unreachable (no mirror answered the test query) - the online identification of candidates is degraded for this run INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ########### Processing Cet-09-Q2b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 632439 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 632439 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits_preview.png'
Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits_preview.png'
Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. Field altitude during imaging: 38.4 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Field altitude during imaging: 38.4 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2300.5383 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.8181 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1475.3714 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 546.5166 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1473.9354 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 545.5055 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 0.641316 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 10.6099996566772 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 11.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-04T21:58:40.6576093' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T03:58:40.6576093' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.1657483447 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T03:58:50.5573961' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.1658629281 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.999404032139 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.999878884408 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 38.3725 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 182.249166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.60843732055183 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20686 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20686 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 10.6099996566772 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 10.6099996566772 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 78.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.99 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 11.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 348.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits :) Spent 0.553414 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 10.4799995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 11.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-04T21:59:32.0122278' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T03:59:32.0122278' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.1663427316 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T03:59:41.9158319' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.1664573494 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.999404067677 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9998788572561 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 38.365 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 182.512777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.60870199272753 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20686 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20686 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 10.4799995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 10.4799995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 78.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.99 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 11.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 348.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits :) Spent 0.584562 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits
fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461349.66586409 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Image size: 936.9'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:01.882 -18:00:32.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.882 -18:00:32.87 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0106 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits Image size: 936.9'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.440 -18:00:13.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.440 -18:00:13.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0028 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:00:01.882 -18:00:32.87 Second-epoch second image center 00:00:00.440 -18:00:13.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00787 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qMIJVWihhl Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.44JQpdTk31 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bLYgoDCyG1 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MXc5ZZ8sub Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.377200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.377200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.05 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.33 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.33
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=6.1) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg Loaded 4123 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1992 out of 2014 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2014 out of 2454 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=6.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 2.2 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 2.5 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits 2.4 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.3 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 14.3 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 15.2 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits 15.2 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.qMIJVWihhl (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=208, bad_region=499, passed=2460 Got 2460 stars (including 1784 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5854 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5854 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1726 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1723 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5853 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5853 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1726 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 1723 stars left (next iteration limit 1895) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=1723 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=568 n_q2=322 n_q3=534 n_q4=299 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.041 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=1723 N_valid=1723 bias_ra_arcsec=0.012 bias_dec_arcsec=0.027 median_sep_arcsec=0.290 p95_sep_arcsec=1.192 n_q1=568 n_q2=322 n_q3=534 n_q4=299 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.44JQpdTk31 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=201, bad_region=492, passed=2454 Got 2454 stars (including 1791 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5961 through 0 to 8.4401, gap 8.4401 to 351.5961 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1733 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1729 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5952 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5952 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1733 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 1729 stars left (next iteration limit 1901) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=1729 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=569 n_q2=319 n_q3=549 n_q4=292 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.054 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=1729 N_valid=1729 bias_ra_arcsec=0.069 bias_dec_arcsec=0.022 median_sep_arcsec=0.329 p95_sep_arcsec=2.097 n_q1=569 n_q2=319 n_q3=549 n_q4=292 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.bLYgoDCyG1 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=281, bad_region=1081, passed=4872 Got 4872 stars (including 3553 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4872 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5956 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5956 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3461 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3459 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3459 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3459 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4005 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5959 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5959 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3462 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3458 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4005 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3458 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4005 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 3458 stars left (next iteration limit 3804) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3458 robust_rms=7.774 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.079 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.079 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3458 robust_rms=0.350 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.608 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.608 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3458 robust_rms=0.288 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.393 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.393 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3458 robust_rms_before=0.987 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.292 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.288 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.407 worst_region_rms_after=0.393 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.058 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.393 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.407 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.407 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.292 arcsec matched=3458 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits N_match=3458 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=1078 n_q2=653 n_q3=1094 n_q4=633 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.054 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3458 N_valid=3458 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.708 bias_dec_arcsec=0.553 median_sep_arcsec=0.934 p95_sep_arcsec=1.647 n_q1=1078 n_q2=653 n_q3=1094 n_q4=633 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.MXc5ZZ8sub (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=304, bad_region=1089, passed=4835 Got 4835 stars (including 3488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4835 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5955 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5955 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3397 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3395 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3395 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3395 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5959 through 0 to 8.4410, gap 8.4410 to 351.5959 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3398 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3394 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3394 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 3394 stars left (next iteration limit 3734) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3394 robust_rms=7.721 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.978 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.978 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3394 robust_rms=0.369 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.577 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.577 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3394 robust_rms=0.303 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.359 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.359 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3394 robust_rms_before=0.995 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.292 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.303 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.372 worst_region_rms_after=0.359 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.094 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.359 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.372 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.372 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.292 arcsec matched=3394 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits N_match=3394 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=1055 n_q2=643 n_q3=1058 n_q4=638 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3394 N_valid=3394 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.711 bias_dec_arcsec=0.522 median_sep_arcsec=0.930 p95_sep_arcsec=1.685 n_q1=1055 n_q2=643 n_q3=1058 n_q4=638 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.041 ref2=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.054 new1=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits sigma_overall=0.297 worst_q_ratio=1.054 new2=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits sigma_overall=0.301 worst_q_ratio=1.077 reference average sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.0475 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472_astrometric_residuals.png (1723 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473_astrometric_residuals.png (1729 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198_astrometric_residuals.png (3458 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199_astrometric_residuals.png (3394 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:55:48.58 -17:47:26.3: 10.79 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:05:56.35 -20:39:15.1: 10.83 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:05:56.35 -20:39:15.1: 10.77 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:55:48.58 -17:47:26.3: 10.84 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.80 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.81 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:05:56.35 -20:39:15.1: ref_mag=10.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0131 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:48.58 -17:47:26.3: ref_mag=10.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9056 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20091_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 20091_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 11 05.16586 2461349.66586 11.02 00:05:56.35 -20:39:15.3 3957 4801 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 11.01 00:05:56.36 -20:39:15.0 3954 4804 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20092_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 20092_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.16586 2461349.66586 10.92 23:55:48.58 -17:47:26.6 5396 3063 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 10.89 23:55:48.58 -17:47:26.0 5393 3066 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20132_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 20132_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 8.66 00:02:07.41 -14:40:35.2 4474 1183 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 00:02:07.41 -14:40:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20470_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 20470_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 11.19 23:49:36.82 -15:50:59.8 6299 1898 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 23:49:36.83 -15:50:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01803_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 01803_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 7.24 23:43:50.10 -15:17:09.8 7150 1566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 23:43:50.09 -15:17:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Image size: 936.9'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:01.882 -18:00:32.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.882 -18:00:32.87 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0106 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits Image size: 936.9'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 00:00:00.440 -18:00:13.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.440 -18:00:13.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0028 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 00:00:01.882 -18:00:32.87 Second-epoch second image center 00:00:00.440 -18:00:13.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00787 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5t8vjx77KM Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PbQNvJTKlP Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q1hVKP8EU0 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UzYM5Z9b7g Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_
JD 2461233.94143: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461233.94194: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=4. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=4. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable..fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.243850 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.243850 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.46 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.46
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=4.8) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 15163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg Loaded 4148 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3365 out of 3470 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3470 out of 15163 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=4.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 68 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 2.1 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 2.4 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits 2.3 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.5 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 14.5 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 15.2 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits 15.3 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.5t8vjx77KM (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=477, bad_region=2343, passed=14965 Got 14965 stars (including 12255 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14965 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5847 through 0 to 8.4424, gap 8.4424 to 351.5847 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5844 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5844 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 4851 stars left (next iteration limit 5335) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=4851 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=1541 n_q2=825 n_q3=1604 n_q4=881 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.043 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4851 N_valid=4851 bias_ra_arcsec=0.013 bias_dec_arcsec=0.023 median_sep_arcsec=0.351 p95_sep_arcsec=1.229 n_q1=1541 n_q2=825 n_q3=1604 n_q4=881 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.PbQNvJTKlP (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=621, bad_region=2493, passed=15162 Got 15162 stars (including 12248 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15162 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5857 through 0 to 8.4400, gap 8.4400 to 351.5857 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4843 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5846 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5846 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 4843 stars left (next iteration limit 5327) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=4843 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=1540 n_q2=830 n_q3=1606 n_q4=867 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4843 N_valid=4843 bias_ra_arcsec=0.093 bias_dec_arcsec=0.010 median_sep_arcsec=0.392 p95_sep_arcsec=2.054 n_q1=1540 n_q2=830 n_q3=1606 n_q4=867 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Q1hVKP8EU0 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=963, bad_region=4165, passed=23159 Got 23159 stars (including 18288 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23159 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5845 through 0 to 8.4421, gap 8.4421 to 351.5845 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4800 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20071 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5848 through 0 to 8.4430, gap 8.4430 to 351.5848 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20071 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20071 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4799 stars left (next iteration limit 5280) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=7.616 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.012 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.012 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=0.367 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.652 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.652 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4799 robust_rms=0.312 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.412 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.412 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4799 robust_rms_before=0.992 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.310 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.312 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.443 worst_region_rms_after=0.412 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.059 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.412 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.443 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.443 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.310 arcsec matched=4799 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits N_match=4799 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=1539 n_q2=883 n_q3=1514 n_q4=863 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.053 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4799 N_valid=4799 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.704 bias_dec_arcsec=0.561 median_sep_arcsec=0.942 p95_sep_arcsec=1.641 n_q1=1539 n_q2=883 n_q3=1514 n_q4=863 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.UzYM5Z9b7g (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1086, bad_region=4227, passed=23683 Got 23683 stars (including 18757 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23683 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5845 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5845 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4800 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4790 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20535 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5848 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5848 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4799 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20535 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20535 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4789 stars left (next iteration limit 5269) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=7.597 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.785 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.785 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=0.383 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.566 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.566 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=0.317 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.381 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.381 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4789 robust_rms_before=0.999 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.308 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.317 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.388 worst_region_rms_after=0.381 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.088 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.381 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.388 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.388 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.308 arcsec matched=4789 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits N_match=4789 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1527 n_q2=900 n_q3=1503 n_q4=859 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.060 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4789 N_valid=4789 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.712 bias_dec_arcsec=0.521 median_sep_arcsec=0.940 p95_sep_arcsec=1.677 n_q1=1527 n_q2=900 n_q3=1503 n_q4=859 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:11:00.47 -18:33:07.6: 12.19 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:11:00.47 -18:33:07.6: 12.17 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:11:00.47 -18:33:07.6: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1302 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:18:21.30 -21:12:36.0: 13.61 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:17:09.55 -21:53:46.6: 13.97 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:18:28.75 -22:12:01.9: 13.77 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:13:19.58 -21:18:39.2: 13.86 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:18:01.21 -21:52:16.3: 14.07 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:15:25.30 -21:26:41.3: 13.76 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:15:33.05 -21:23:29.6: 14.04 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:17:09.55 -21:53:46.6: 13.86 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:18:28.75 -22:12:01.9: 13.72 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:09.55 -21:53:46.6: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6464 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:18:21.30 -21:12:36.0: 13.70 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:28.75 -22:12:01.9: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5033 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:21.30 -21:12:36.0: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6588 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:06:56.44 -22:09:33.4: 13.69 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:18:01.21 -21:52:16.3: 13.84 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:01.21 -21:52:16.3: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7243 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:13:19.58 -21:18:39.2: 13.93 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:15:25.30 -21:26:41.3: 13.84 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:15:33.05 -21:23:29.6: 14.26 +/- 0.23 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:19.58 -21:18:39.2: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6645 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:25.30 -21:26:41.3: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6798 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:33.05 -21:23:29.6: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7177 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:06:56.44 -22:09:33.4: 13.68 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:56.44 -22:09:33.4: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6853 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:47:50.14 -22:00:50.3: 13.82 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:05:16.68 -16:28:37.0: 13.64 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:47:50.14 -22:00:50.3: 13.78 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:47:50.14 -22:00:50.3: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7080 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:05:16.68 -16:28:37.0: 14.03 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:05:16.68 -16:28:37.0: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7678 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20957_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 20957_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.82 23:57:36.85 -19:43:17.4 5133 4233 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21243_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 21243_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 10.64 23:42:37.86 -15:52:16.7 7319 1924 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21366_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 21366_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=4. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=4. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 11.28 00:06:22.29 -18:03:32.5 3875 3235 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21517_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 21517_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 11.46 23:45:20.65 -14:19:48.3 6939 0981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21780_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 21780_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.16586 2461349.66586 12.13 00:11:00.48 -18:33:07.9 3217 3540 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 12.13 00:11:00.46 -18:33:07.4 3213 3543 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21882_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 21882_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 12.32 00:14:21.03 -21:54:21.6 2777 5588 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21922_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 21922_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 12.15 23:44:02.86 -15:15:16.3 7119 1546 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22006_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22006_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 12.38 00:10:07.40 -17:31:49.6 3330 2923 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22056_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22056_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 12.42 23:44:44.09 -21:34:11.3 6950 5374 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22140_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22140_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 12.37 23:44:51.53 -14:38:08.6 7007 1168 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22144_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22144_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 12.47 00:02:33.13 -15:14:41.0 4413 1528 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22199_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22199_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 12.69 00:04:43.87 -22:04:21.6 4133 5663 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22237_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22237_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 12.57 23:45:05.31 -17:33:37.9 6941 2942 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22326_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22326_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 12.92 00:17:46.16 -18:25:32.8 2238 3489 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22390_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22390_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 12.86 00:02:22.30 -21:57:45.1 4464 5593 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22469_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22469_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 12.90 00:06:22.48 -17:24:37.3 3870 2843 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22503_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22503_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.19 23:50:23.82 -21:52:23.1 6148 5544 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22536_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22536_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 12.96 00:04:01.86 -15:13:57.0 4197 1522 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22566_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22566_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.18 00:18:02.02 -20:57:24.6 2241 5026 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22592_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22592_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.03 00:16:29.14 -19:04:04.1 2433 3873 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22595_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22595_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.00 00:09:53.50 -14:13:02.4 3330 0914 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22604_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22604_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 12.95 23:48:50.56 -17:42:07.9 6397 3020 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22605_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22605_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.06 00:08:09.37 -22:07:19.9 3652 5700 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22613_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22613_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 12.96 00:11:05.15 -13:51:26.3 3150 0697 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22663_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22663_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 12.96 23:49:34.74 -18:58:32.9 6282 3789 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22728_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22728_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.06 23:48:15.00 -18:31:31.5 6476 3519 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22739_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22739_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.07 23:50:11.22 -17:42:14.9 6203 3019 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22762_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22762_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.13 23:48:18.12 -16:06:11.3 6488 2053 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22792_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22792_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.20 23:55:58.55 -20:59:35.7 5364 5003 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22845_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22845_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.18 23:50:40.52 -19:40:17.0 6121 4208 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22857_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22857_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.26 00:18:55.40 -21:46:50.1 2128 5532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22923_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22923_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.16 23:41:53.41 -18:03:45.8 7398 3255 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22964_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22964_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.10 23:41:58.80 -20:24:04.7 7355 4673 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22991_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22991_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.35 00:11:38.74 -20:06:31.5 3139 4487 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22997_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22997_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.41 00:05:07.91 -21:36:27.9 4074 5381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22998_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 22998_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.15 23:45:55.22 -20:23:56.1 6793 4659 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23023_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23023_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.33 00:07:23.42 -18:30:16.0 3732 3506 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23045_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23045_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.27 00:11:10.24 -14:04:37.0 3140 0831 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23069_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23069_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.16586 2461349.66586 13.54 00:18:28.72 -22:12:02.1 2201 5783 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.47 00:18:28.78 -22:12:01.6 2198 5786 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23085_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23085_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.54 23:58:45.33 -20:39:39.0 4971 4801 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23087_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23087_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.48 00:16:36.47 -16:00:52.1 2368 2023 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23114_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23114_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.16586 2461349.66586 13.56 00:17:09.60 -21:53:46.1 2383 5590 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.76 00:17:09.50 -21:53:47.1 2380 5594 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23152_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23152_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.59 00:13:19.74 -18:29:53.1 2879 3517 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23203_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23203_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.35 23:53:46.25 -15:00:44.9 5696 1386 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23209_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23209_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.16586 2461349.66586 13.66 00:18:21.30 -21:12:35.8 2203 5178 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.66 00:18:21.31 -21:12:36.3 2199 5182 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23213_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23213_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.47 23:59:35.13 -17:27:45.6 4849 2868 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23288_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23288_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.36 23:41:31.77 -16:24:18.7 7473 2251 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23317_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23317_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.16586 2461349.66586 13.66 00:13:19.59 -21:18:39.2 2918 5219 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.67 00:13:19.56 -21:18:39.3 2914 5222 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23361_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23361_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=1.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.56 23:55:14.02 -20:24:59.7 5470 4654 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23387_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23387_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.16586 2461349.66586 13.71 00:15:25.25 -21:26:41.7 2623 5308 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.65 00:15:25.34 -21:26:40.8 2619 5311 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23388_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23388_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.16586 2461349.66586 13.73 00:18:01.24 -21:52:16.4 2261 5579 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.72 00:18:01.17 -21:52:16.2 2258 5583 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23398_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23398_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.16586 2461349.66586 13.72 00:15:33.07 -21:23:29.8 2603 5276 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.72 00:15:33.03 -21:23:29.4 2600 5280 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23411_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23411_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.48 00:00:47.86 -20:40:10.2 4682 4807 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23420_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23420_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.59 00:17:52.37 -15:50:52.1 2180 1926 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23425_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23425_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.16586 2461349.66586 13.69 00:06:56.47 -22:09:33.4 3826 5716 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.68 00:06:56.41 -22:09:33.4 3823 5720 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23534_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23534_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.70 00:14:21.77 -16:56:29.7 2709 2578 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23556_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23556_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.43 23:42:45.20 -17:07:11.3 7285 2681 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23579_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23579_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.75 00:10:46.67 -14:59:26.7 3208 1386 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23603_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23603_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.57 23:49:25.13 -19:06:57.2 6304 3874 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23616_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23616_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.64 23:43:02.09 -13:52:37.0 7286 0709 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23679_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23679_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.16586 2461349.66586 13.71 23:47:50.18 -22:00:51.1 6511 5632 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.71 23:47:50.09 -22:00:49.6 6508 5635 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23687_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23687_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.16586 2461349.66586 13.78 00:05:16.71 -16:28:37.6 4026 2274 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-58-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0198.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.76 00:05:16.65 -16:28:36.3 4023 2277 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23910_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 23910_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.52 23:45:25.02 -17:01:24.5 6899 2616 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 24079_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 24079_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 13.56 23:43:35.11 -13:45:27.2 7206 0635 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 06325_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 06325_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 12.91 23:56:00.63 -18:16:02.0 5363 3354 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 12864_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 12864_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461233.94143: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 8.79 00:02:07.42 -14:40:35.4 4474 1183 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 00:02:07.42 -14:40:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 11033_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 11033_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461233.94143: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461233.94194: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 12.38 00:05:17.42 -16:21:22.4 4020 2204 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 13583_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 The candidate 13583_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461233.94143: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461233.94194: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=2.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.16646 2461349.66646 7.43 23:43:50.09 -15:17:09.8 7150 1566 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_220958_TTUQ2b1x1_207305_Se6j7jkC/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_21-59-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0199.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 23:43:50.08 -15:17:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.66586409 -observatory V36 14:34:19.71 -15:18:59.7 Mercury (6.4mag) 13:23:23.24 -12:54:14.4 Venus (-4.5mag) 09:33:05.63 +16:18:48.6 Mars (0.8mag) 09:47:53.46 +14:02:25.2 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:36:01.38 +00:58:21.8 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:08:44.85 +20:49:23.4 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:08:12.18 -00:39:05.0 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:32.42 -23:41:14.8 Pluto (14.5mag) 11:33:54.71 -00:10:12.5 Moon (-9.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Nov 4 22:15 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.66586409: 09:47:47.38 +14:03:01.0 Io (6.0mag) 09:48:02.06 +14:01:35.0 Europa (6.1mag) 09:47:42.29 +14:03:31.0 Ganymede (5.5mag) 09:48:22.48 +13:59:41.0 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:49:27.98 +14:10:43.5 Himalia (15.5mag) 09:47:53.66 +14:02:24.0 Thebe (16.3mag) 09:47:45.67 +14:27:30.4 Elara (17.4mag) 09:48:30.16 +13:30:46.3 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 09:44:48.18 +14:34:36.2 Carme (18.7mag) 00:36:13.50 +00:58:05.6 Titan (8.3mag) 00:35:55.63 +00:58:14.8 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:36:34.23 +00:59:21.8 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:35:57.12 +00:57:51.4 Hyperion (14.2mag) 00:34:14.65 +00:46:16.4 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Nov 4 22:15 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.66586409: 04:41:15.64 +16:52:02.4 JWST 18:48:06.63 +08:57:42.7 Chandra 06:07:33.49 +25:17:07.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Nov 4 22:15 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.66586409 -observatory V36 03:32:20.05 +19:54:12.8 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:47:09.56 +38:30:43.3 17.8mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill) 07:47:14.94 +38:30:30.4 17.8mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 07:46:33.17 +38:30:50.9 17.8mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill) 05:01:25.19 +38:47:58.3 17.7mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski) 18:50:03.56 -32:49:24.2 15.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:45:22.78 -74:01:00.3 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:11:00.40 +35:21:22.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 21:43:04.18 +20:30:17.8 17.9mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:35:50.52 +25:20:23.5 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:08:41.32 +38:47:03.3 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:38:11.81 +40:51:32.2 17.5mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:42:27.42 -13:30:56.6 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 14:17:12.25 -04:43:23.4 16.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 20:21:18.59 +51:55:37.3 15.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 13:09:13.72 +17:14:04.9 17.7mag A/2026 E1 15:56:17.10 -66:26:59.6 14.7mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 19:35:47.98 -05:23:32.7 17.1mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS) 10:46:46.77 +02:37:45.0 17.5mag P/2026 U1 (Gafton) 23:24:53.49 +13:36:01.6 16.9mag 2P/Encke 23:28:21.07 -25:16:49.2 15.5mag 10P/Tempel 02:42:04.94 +29:37:39.8 16.5mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:27:14.46 -10:10:36.7 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:10:05.68 -08:59:21.4 15.9mag 65P/Gunn 08:01:30.52 +13:24:46.2 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 20:56:32.26 -24:20:21.4 16.5mag 84P/Giclas 10:41:42.16 +13:13:32.4 17.6mag 93P/Lovas 09:05:31.31 +46:19:18.2 16.8mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:54:23.43 +04:55:40.8 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 12:30:15.53 +07:39:28.9 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 23:26:14.68 -00:57:01.5 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 19:45:05.12 +14:51:39.6 10.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 11:15:45.91 -03:24:49.8 16.3mag 169P/NEAT 09:42:17.21 +23:25:07.8 18.0mag 186P/Garradd 03:09:01.72 +02:04:07.5 15.4mag 220P/McNaught 06:22:41.83 +50:03:49.2 15.9mag 260P/McNaught 07:58:14.41 +25:02:41.5 17.5mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Nov 4 22:15 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:58:35.28 +22:20:06.50 ASASSN-26fs 2026-11-2.4 12.31 02:29:41.13 -71:57:55.60 ASASSN-26fr 2026-11-1.22 13.7 21:27:22.43 -18:15:42.10 SN 2026agsu 2026-10-29.85 -1.08 17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92 10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27 21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82 01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9 01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88 00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77 22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42 01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3 18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Nov 4 22:15 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag 05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag 05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Nov 4 22:15 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 17:54:06.374 +65:12:07.03 AT 2026afyn 2026-09-27.00 27.53 17:54:12.378 +65:11:36.46 AT 2026afym 2026-09-27.00 27.72 17:54:06.270 +65:11:07.40 AT 2026afyl 2026-09-27.00 25.92 17:53:27.005 +65:10:54.26 AT 2026afyk 2026-09-27.00 27.33 17:54:11.180 +65:09:41.88 AT 2026afyj 2026-09-27.00 26.3 17:53:38.059 +65:08:44.42 AT 2026afyi 2026-09-27.00 27.21 17:54:21.568 +65:08:31.22 AT 2026afyh 2026-09-27.00 24.81 17:54:22.489 +65:08:12.98 AT 2026afyg 2026-09-27.00 27.34 17:54:12.363 +65:07:56.68 AT 2026afyf 2026-09-27.00 25.37 17:53:32.198 +65:12:13.26 AT 2026afye 2026-08-07.00 27.52 17:54:17.450 +65:10:55.80 AT 2026afyd 2026-08-07.00 26.19 17:53:34.001 +65:15:33.76 AT 2026afyc 2026-05-27.00 27.28 17:53:39.791 +65:16:43.84 AT 2026afyb 2026-03-28.00 26.7 01:07:23.505 +32:00:53.10 AT 2026afya 2026-10-11.48 20.5 06:56:31.236 +52:33:55.44 AT 2026afxz 2026-10-06.58 20.74 04:59:34.078 -09:52:21.92 AT 2026afxy 2026-10-12.52 19.8 01:14:09.805 -13:39:55.41 AT 2026afxx 2026-10-06.43 19.69 03:41:26.334 -01:30:43.79 AT 2026afxw 2026-10-19.42 20.5509 08:32:00.397 +26:40:21.34 AT 2026afxv 2026-10-16.45 19.9231 10:01:37.234 +18:45:25.97 AT 2026afxu 2026-10-20.53 19.8573 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Nov 4 22:15 tns_transients_list.txt
JD 2461233.94143: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461233.94194: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.66586: SE_FLAGS=4. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.
JD 2461349.66646: SE_FLAGS=4. SATURATED - magnitude unreliable.
