fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 05.11547 | 2461349.61547 | 11.50 | 05:04:08.57 +26:06:14.5 | 5287 0827 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 05.11615 | 2461349.61615 | 11.51 | 05:04:08.59 +26:06:14.5 | 5281 0833 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits |
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 05.1158 2461349.6158 11.51 05:04:08.58 +26:06:14.5
177.20712 -9.20723 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
49 Pales 1 1 2 11.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:08.58 +26:06:14.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:08.58 +26:06:14.5: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
| Date (UTC) | JD(UTC) | mag. | R.A. & Dec.(J2000) | X & Y (pix) | Image | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 11 05.11547 | 2461349.61547 | 13.23 | 05:07:26.45 +31:40:20.6 | 5769 4189 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 11 05.11615 | 2461349.61615 | 13.29 | 05:07:26.47 +31:40:20.6 | 5763 4195 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits |
SExtractor measurement flags:
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 05.1158 2461349.6158 13.26 05:07:26.46 +31:40:20.6
173.12784 -5.31377 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.
359 Georgia 1 1 1 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:07:26.46 +31:40:20.6: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:07:26.46 +31:40:20.6: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS. Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs. WISE atlas Aladin Lite SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242 STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=local (lib/catalogs/local_star_catalog -> local copy: Gaia DR2 gaia_source, G < 19.0, built from https://cdn.gea.esac.esa.int/Gaia/gdr2/gaia_source/csv on 2026-11-04) The APASS known-star check of the candidates is disabled (see the note in util/transients/report_transient.sh) WARNING: VizieR is unreachable (no mirror answered the test query) - the online identification of candidates is degraded for this run INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Aur-05-Q2b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Aur-05-Q2b1x1 ########### Processing Aur-05-Q2b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 660296 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 660296 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.png' -> 'transient_report/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits_preview.png'
Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
renamed 'Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.png' -> 'transient_report/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits_preview.png'
Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. Field altitude during imaging: 15.1 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Field altitude during imaging: 15.3 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 565.0960 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 645.3049 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1636.0928 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 547.8921 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1625.4347 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 549.9967 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.89525 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.004 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 12.1499996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 12.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-04T20:46:07.0036970' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T02:46:07.0036970' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.1153588309 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T02:46:16.9065023' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.1154734492 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 74.9981247422321 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 29.9991950872232 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.0833333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 63.6747222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.79057980183859 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Aur-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '05 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20697 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20697 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 12.1499996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 12.1499996185303 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 8.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 72.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.72 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 12.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.50052 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/d_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits :) Spent 0.791581 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/d_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 12.2399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 12.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-04T20:47:04.9547292' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T02:47:04.9547292' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.1160295601 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T02:47:14.8541399' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.1161441435 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 74.9981246923815 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 29.9991950789543 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.2638888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 63.785 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.74805998229899 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Aur-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '05 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+30 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20697 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20697 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 12.2399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 12.2399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 8.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 72.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.72 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 12.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 21.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.50052 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/d_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits :) Spent 0.808855 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/d_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits
fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461349.61547457 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Image size: 941.2'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:00:00.375 +30:00:10.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 Second-epoch image center 05:00:00.375 +30:00:10.04 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0087 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits Image size: 941.1'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:00:03.332 +29:59:32.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 Second-epoch image center 05:00:03.332 +29:59:32.14 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0085 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 05:00:00.375 +30:00:10.04 Second-epoch second image center 05:00:03.332 +29:59:32.14 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01499 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n2dnZx9j1U Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VxtRQNXZus Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Tiys5t3ovi Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s6FzVtkWwc Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.981000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.981000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=5.9) Read 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2864 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2864 deg Loaded 8429 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6042 out of 6743 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6743 out of 16349 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=5.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 1.9 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 2.4 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits 2.4 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 15.7 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.n2dnZx9j1U (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1498, bad_region=2648, passed=16295 Got 16295 stars (including 12280 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14059 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4843 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14059 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14059 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 4802 stars left (next iteration limit 5283) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4802 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.271 n_q1=2427 n_q2=541 n_q3=1322 n_q4=512 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.065 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4802 N_valid=4802 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.010 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.263 p95_sep_arcsec=1.433 n_q1=2427 n_q2=541 n_q3=1322 n_q4=512 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.VxtRQNXZus (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, bad_region=2654, passed=16349 Got 16349 stars (including 12341 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4799 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14119 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14119 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14119 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 4797 stars left (next iteration limit 5278) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4797 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.279 n_q1=2431 n_q2=544 n_q3=1318 n_q4=504 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4797 N_valid=4797 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.267 p95_sep_arcsec=1.371 n_q1=2431 n_q2=544 n_q3=1318 n_q4=504 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Tiys5t3ovi (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=424, bad_region=2463, passed=7497 Got 7497 stars (including 4750 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7497 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4594 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4551 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4551 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4551 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5589 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4593 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4552 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5589 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4552 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5589 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Excluding outliers - 4552 stars left (next iteration limit 5006) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4552 robust_rms=6.639 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.493 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.493 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4552 robust_rms=0.686 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.893 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.893 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4552 robust_rms=0.524 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.803 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.803 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4552 robust_rms_before=1.646 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.518 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.524 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.780 worst_region_rms_after=0.803 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.448 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.803 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.780 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.780 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.518 arcsec matched=4552 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits N_match=4552 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.506 n_q1=891 n_q2=821 n_q3=1422 n_q4=1418 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.196 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4552 N_valid=4552 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.432 bias_dec_arcsec=0.718 median_sep_arcsec=1.501 p95_sep_arcsec=2.999 n_q1=891 n_q2=821 n_q3=1422 n_q4=1418 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.s6FzVtkWwc (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=417, bad_region=2472, passed=7564 Got 7564 stars (including 4805 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7564 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4643 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4603 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4603 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4603 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5649 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4641 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4603 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5649 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4603 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5649 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" Excluding outliers - 4603 stars left (next iteration limit 5063) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4603 robust_rms=6.771 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.745 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.745 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4603 robust_rms=0.675 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.963 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.963 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4603 robust_rms=0.498 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.790 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.790 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4603 robust_rms_before=1.681 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.503 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.498 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.842 worst_region_rms_after=0.790 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.608 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.790 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.842 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.842 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.503 arcsec matched=4603 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits N_match=4603 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.624 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.489 n_q1=921 n_q2=838 n_q3=1416 n_q4=1428 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4603 N_valid=4603 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.453 bias_dec_arcsec=0.712 median_sep_arcsec=1.476 p95_sep_arcsec=3.063 n_q1=921 n_q2=838 n_q3=1416 n_q4=1428 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.392 worst_q_ratio=1.065 ref2=Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.079 new1=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits sigma_overall=0.518 worst_q_ratio=1.196 new2=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits sigma_overall=0.503 worst_q_ratio=1.241 reference average sigma_overall=0.3845 worst_q_ratio=1.072 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (4802 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (4797 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128_astrometric_residuals.png (4552 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129_astrometric_residuals.png (4603 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:08.58 +26:06:14.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:08.58 +26:06:14.5: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21866.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21866_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 Preparing report for the candidate 21866_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 05:04:08.58 +26:06:14.5 wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Image size: 941.2'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:00:00.375 +30:00:10.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 Second-epoch image center 05:00:00.375 +30:00:10.04 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0087 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits Image size: 941.1'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:00:03.332 +29:59:32.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 Second-epoch image center 05:00:03.332 +29:59:32.14 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0085 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 05:00:00.375 +30:00:10.04 Second-epoch second image center 05:00:03.332 +29:59:32.14 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01499 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DXfKBXp8kZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zoLZ8QgP49 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B7YxA2A4GG Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6IpuoGjmgz Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6871 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6871 out of 129003 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.831850 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.831850 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.99 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.84 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.84
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 129003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec +24.3225 to +35.3000 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5559 to 84.6888 deg, Dec 24.3225 to 35.3000 deg Loaded 8484 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4942 out of 6871 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6871 out of 129003 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=4.4) Read 129055 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.2955 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6902 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.2955 deg Loaded 8479 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4936 out of 6879 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6879 out of 129055 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=4.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 55 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.8 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 1.9 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 2.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits 2.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.8 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 15.8 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits 14.9 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.DXfKBXp8kZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=14027, bad_region=17069, passed=128981 Got 128981 stars (including 98831 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 128981 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4808 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115119 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115119 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115119 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4807 stars left (next iteration limit 5288) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4807 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.241 n_q1=2304 n_q2=552 n_q3=1394 n_q4=557 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.071 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4807 N_valid=4807 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.018 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.000 median_sep_arcsec=0.250 p95_sep_arcsec=1.236 n_q1=2304 n_q2=552 n_q3=1394 n_q4=557 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.zoLZ8QgP49 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=13827, bad_region=17078, passed=129033 Got 129033 stars (including 99032 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 129033 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115182 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115182 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115182 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5284) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.252 n_q1=2299 n_q2=560 n_q3=1389 n_q4=556 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.064 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4804 N_valid=4804 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.012 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.258 p95_sep_arcsec=1.251 n_q1=2299 n_q2=560 n_q3=1389 n_q4=556 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.B7YxA2A4GG (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=3308, bad_region=14433, passed=61908 Got 61908 stars (including 45005 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61908 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4783 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51568 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51568 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51568 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" Excluding outliers - 4785 stars left (next iteration limit 5261) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4785 robust_rms=6.450 arcsec worst_region_rms=14.126 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=14.126 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4785 robust_rms=0.686 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.930 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.930 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4785 robust_rms=0.524 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.802 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.802 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4785 robust_rms_before=1.676 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.511 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.524 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.841 worst_region_rms_after=0.802 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.423 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.802 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.841 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.841 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.511 arcsec matched=4785 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits N_match=4785 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.500 n_q1=983 n_q2=894 n_q3=1401 n_q4=1507 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4785 N_valid=4785 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.478 bias_dec_arcsec=0.763 median_sep_arcsec=1.541 p95_sep_arcsec=2.987 n_q1=983 n_q2=894 n_q3=1401 n_q4=1507 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.6IpuoGjmgz (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3339, bad_region=14518, passed=61995 Got 61995 stars (including 45022 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61995 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4783 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51627 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51627 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51627 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" Excluding outliers - 4784 stars left (next iteration limit 5260) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=6.614 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.787 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.787 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=0.668 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.978 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.978 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=0.500 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.754 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.754 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4784 robust_rms_before=1.695 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.491 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.500 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.837 worst_region_rms_after=0.754 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.540 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.754 SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 1.695 -> 0.500 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits is a symbolic link SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4784 pairs from the previous matching) UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4600 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4600 pairs (4784 from the previous matching) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4600 robust_rms=6.567 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.146 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.146 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4600 robust_rms=0.668 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.960 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.960 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4600 robust_rms=0.497 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.751 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.751 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4600 robust_rms_before=0.498 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.498 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.497 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.751 worst_region_rms_after=0.751 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.751 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.751 SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 0.498 -> 0.497 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits is a symbolic link Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4600 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51627 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4600 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51606 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits N_match=4600 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.643 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.478 n_q1=946 n_q2=831 n_q3=1357 n_q4=1466 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4600 N_valid=4600 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.474 bias_dec_arcsec=0.740 median_sep_arcsec=1.472 p95_sep_arcsec=2.836 n_q1=946 n_q2=831 n_q3=1357 n_q4=1466 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:13:28.62 +26:08:05.4: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:49:32.29 +28:21:23.2: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:59:40.30 +30:53:33.2: 14.19 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:51:34.49 +29:07:25.8: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:14:19.63 +33:19:40.2: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:12:52.93 +30:45:09.8: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:49:32.29 +28:21:23.2: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:59:40.30 +30:53:33.2: 14.19 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:51:34.49 +29:07:25.8: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:32.29 +28:21:23.2: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2491 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:14:19.63 +33:19:40.2: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:13:28.62 +26:08:05.4: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:34.49 +29:07:25.8: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8908 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:59:40.30 +30:53:33.2: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0743 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:14:19.63 +33:19:40.2: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8916 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:28.62 +26:08:05.4: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9516 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:43:52.87 +26:43:11.9: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:12:52.93 +30:45:09.8: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:12:52.93 +30:45:09.8: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9091 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:52:18.15 +31:47:11.9: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:18:38.72 +33:39:15.0: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:43:52.87 +26:43:11.9: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:52.87 +26:43:11.9: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6732 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:52:18.15 +31:47:11.9: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:18.15 +31:47:11.9: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7096 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:18:38.72 +33:39:15.0: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:18:38.72 +33:39:15.0: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9458 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:07:26.46 +31:40:20.6: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:17:10.62 +27:23:40.1: 13.17 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:07:26.46 +31:40:20.6: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:17:10.62 +27:23:40.1: 13.09 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:10.62 +27:23:40.1: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3520 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:19:26.86 +30:19:06.4: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:45.53 +30:13:12.2: 14.29 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:19:26.86 +30:19:06.4: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:19:26.86 +30:19:06.4: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7546 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:06:23.09 +29:50:22.6: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:45.53 +30:13:12.2: 14.09 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:45.53 +30:13:12.2: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0709 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:06:23.09 +29:50:22.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:06:23.09 +29:50:22.6: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9849 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out153724.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 149652_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 149652_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 1 2026 11 05.11547 2461349.61547 14.34 04:49:32.36 +28:21:23.0 3374 2249 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 14.18 04:49:32.22 +28:21:23.4 3367 2256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 149661_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 149661_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.11547 2461349.61547 14.07 05:13:28.62 +26:08:05.4 6554 0838 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.87 05:13:28.62 +26:08:05.4 6548 0844 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 149666_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 149666_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 14.02 04:54:41.73 +32:01:57.8 4136 4448 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 04:54:41.74 +32:01:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 149671_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 149671_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.11547 2461349.61547 14.05 04:59:40.32 +30:53:32.1 4760 3733 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 14.11 04:59:40.29 +30:53:34.3 4753 3740 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 149672_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 149672_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 14.17 04:58:10.37 +28:15:17.1 4511 2153 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 04:58:10.41 +28:15:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 149675_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 149675_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=2.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.92 05:03:36.93 +33:23:47.1 5291 5244 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:03:36.94 +33:23:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 149677_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 149677_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.11547 2461349.61547 13.90 05:14:19.63 +33:19:39.2 6650 5194 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.89 05:14:19.62 +33:19:41.1 6644 5201 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 149678_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 149678_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.11547 2461349.61547 13.92 04:51:34.49 +29:07:25.2 3665 2701 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.87 04:51:34.49 +29:07:26.5 3659 2708 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 149680_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 149680_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.11547 2461349.61547 13.86 05:12:52.91 +30:45:09.3 6469 3633 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.98 05:12:52.94 +30:45:10.2 6463 3639 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 149685_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 149685_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.82 05:01:55.18 +32:54:10.3 5071 4948 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:01:55.20 +32:54:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 149690_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 149690_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.11547 2461349.61547 13.74 04:43:52.82 +26:43:12.3 2559 1296 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.62 04:43:52.91 +26:43:11.4 2553 1303 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 149705_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 149705_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.11547 2461349.61547 12.95 05:18:38.73 +33:39:14.7 7195 5402 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 12.94 05:18:38.72 +33:39:15.3 7189 5408 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 149710_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 149710_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.11547 2461349.61547 12.73 04:52:18.15 +31:47:12.0 3830 4304 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 12.69 04:52:18.14 +31:47:11.9 3824 4311 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 149714_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 149714_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 12.34 04:42:31.61 +31:29:55.1 2557 4204 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 04:42:31.53 +31:29:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151171_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 151171_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 12.12 05:18:18.01 +33:47:32.8 7144 5492 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:18:18.04 +33:47:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151534_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 151534_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 12.35 05:15:29.72 +32:42:36.6 6794 4828 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:15:29.74 +32:42:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 151985_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 151985_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 12.59 05:14:46.50 +31:23:50.5 6707 4031 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:14:46.52 +31:23:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152400_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 152400_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 12.78 04:51:22.03 +28:31:16.4 3615 2345 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 04:51:21.98 +28:31:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152696_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 152696_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 12.78 05:05:45.96 +26:25:47.1 5504 1028 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:05:45.95 +26:25:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153601_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 153601_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.05 05:18:28.50 +33:11:29.6 7171 5127 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:18:28.55 +33:11:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153611_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 153611_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=2.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.22 04:59:17.31 +32:33:37.9 4732 4749 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 04:59:17.39 +32:33:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153724_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 Preparing report for the candidate 153724_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153760_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 153760_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=1.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=1.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.20 05:17:19.63 +33:12:06.9 7025 5130 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:17:19.81 +33:12:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153826_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 153826_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=1.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.31 04:48:18.87 +29:47:15.4 3250 3128 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 04:48:18.89 +29:47:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154190_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 154190_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.31 05:04:49.99 +29:58:35.0 5412 3174 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:04:49.98 +29:58:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154243_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 154243_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.23 05:09:49.78 +29:48:29.2 6064 3068 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:09:49.72 +29:48:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154272_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 154272_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.45 04:48:17.72 +29:45:37.3 3246 3112 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 04:48:17.75 +29:45:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154377_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 154377_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.55 05:19:27.70 +34:00:25.0 7289 5626 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:19:27.65 +34:00:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154456_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 154456_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.48 05:19:17.46 +31:00:38.4 7294 3807 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:19:17.39 +31:00:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154582_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 154582_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=1.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.61 05:19:18.24 +33:59:48.2 7269 5619 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:19:18.20 +33:59:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154725_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 154725_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.11547 2461349.61547 13.37 05:17:10.52 +27:23:40.8 7049 1606 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.34 05:17:10.72 +27:23:39.4 7043 1613 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154853_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 154853_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.54 05:18:09.22 +33:24:15.7 7129 5255 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:18:09.20 +33:24:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154868_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 154868_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.44 05:17:17.86 +33:11:43.7 7021 5126 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:17:17.90 +33:11:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 155321_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 155321_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.71 04:49:22.27 +29:33:47.5 3381 2986 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 04:49:22.25 +29:33:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 155686_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 155686_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.74 05:12:52.74 +32:19:51.0 6461 4594 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:12:52.74 +32:19:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 155875_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 155875_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.70 04:59:12.21 +33:29:14.6 4737 5310 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 04:59:12.20 +33:29:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 155916_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 155916_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.51 05:10:31.69 +30:49:30.9 6158 3682 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:10:31.72 +30:49:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 155956_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 155956_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.82 04:59:24.18 +31:04:55.8 4722 3855 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 04:59:24.17 +31:04:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 156130_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 156130_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.89 05:04:38.93 +32:11:19.2 5410 4511 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:04:38.96 +32:11:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 156140_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 156140_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.74 04:50:52.88 +29:08:40.2 3568 2724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 04:50:52.91 +29:08:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 156231_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 156231_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=1.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=1.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.83 04:59:38.27 +31:15:22.1 4755 3959 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 04:59:38.22 +31:15:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 156476_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 156476_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.79 05:15:53.09 +30:28:33.3 6854 3476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:15:53.05 +30:28:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 156667_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 156667_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.11547 2461349.61547 13.79 05:19:26.82 +30:19:06.4 7327 3382 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.72 05:19:26.89 +30:19:06.5 7321 3388 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 156960_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 156960_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 14.10 05:09:59.00 +27:39:18.7 6078 1767 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:09:58.95 +27:39:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 157003_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 157003_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.92 05:12:52.27 +31:01:07.8 6461 3800 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:12:52.19 +31:01:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 157213_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 157213_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.74 05:07:47.91 +30:15:40.3 5801 3343 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:07:47.86 +30:15:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 157701_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 157701_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 14.15 05:16:00.26 +33:43:33.5 6855 5445 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:16:00.21 +33:43:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 157779_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 157779_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=1.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.11547 2461349.61547 14.07 05:05:45.41 +30:13:11.6 5541 3313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 14.07 05:05:45.65 +30:13:12.7 5535 3320 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 158241_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 158241_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 14.24 05:02:11.45 +29:59:10.5 5067 3186 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:02:11.41 +29:59:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 143958_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 143958_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.48 05:10:32.20 +32:10:41.6 6162 4500 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:10:32.06 +32:10:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78967_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 78967_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461032.80097: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.11547 2461349.61547 14.10 05:06:23.11 +29:50:22.2 5620 3083 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-46-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0128.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.91 05:06:23.08 +29:50:23.0 5613 3090 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76531_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 76531_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461032.80049: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 12.27 05:16:37.50 +29:52:07.7 6954 3110 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:16:37.51 +29:52:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461032.80049: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461032.80097: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 12.37 05:03:15.50 +28:42:52.2 5192 2416 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:03:15.44 +28:42:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461032.80049: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461032.80097: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 13.71 05:13:11.27 +33:50:55.8 6499 5515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:13:11.31 +33:50:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 99874_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 The candidate 99874_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461032.80049: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461032.80097: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.11615 2461349.61615 11.52 05:04:08.54 +26:06:13.7 5281 0833 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_210354_TTUQ2b1x1_1076477_JRFcJf2L/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-47-04_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0129.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 05:04:08.54 +26:06:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 05:04:08.58 +26:06:14.5 05:07:26.46 +31:40:20.6 ########### Completed Aur-05-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 05:04:08.58 +26:06:14.5 05:07:26.46 +31:40:20.6 ################################################################################### 05:04:08.58 +26:06:14.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 05:07:26.46 +31:40:20.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.61547457 -observatory V36 14:34:33.64 -15:21:12.9 Mercury (6.4mag) 13:23:25.71 -12:55:21.9 Venus (-4.4mag) 09:32:59.59 +16:19:13.0 Mars (0.8mag) 09:47:52.10 +14:02:31.3 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:36:02.06 +00:58:25.5 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:08:45.33 +20:49:24.6 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:08:12.40 -00:39:03.6 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:32.31 -23:41:15.3 Pluto (14.5mag) 11:30:35.59 +00:08:04.9 Moon (-9.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Nov 4 21:16 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.61547457: 09:47:46.57 +14:03:04.0 Io (6.0mag) 09:48:00.05 +14:01:44.8 Europa (6.1mag) 09:47:41.52 +14:03:33.7 Ganymede (5.5mag) 09:48:21.32 +13:59:46.0 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:49:26.42 +14:10:51.7 Himalia (15.5mag) 09:47:53.96 +14:02:20.9 Thebe (16.3mag) 09:47:44.14 +14:27:36.4 Elara (17.4mag) 09:48:29.06 +13:30:51.2 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 09:44:47.02 +14:34:41.9 Carme (18.7mag) 00:36:14.17 +00:58:08.9 Titan (8.3mag) 00:35:56.10 +00:58:19.3 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:36:34.84 +00:59:25.0 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:35:57.58 +00:57:55.3 Hyperion (14.2mag) 00:34:15.32 +00:46:20.0 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Nov 4 21:16 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.61547457: 04:41:10.15 +16:51:47.4 JWST 18:42:09.55 +12:32:08.0 Chandra 05:32:36.31 +38:03:59.6 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Nov 4 21:16 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.61547457 -observatory V36 03:32:22.39 +19:54:17.0 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:47:08.67 +38:30:29.7 17.8mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill) 07:47:14.05 +38:30:16.8 17.8mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 07:46:32.29 +38:30:37.3 17.8mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill) 05:01:26.14 +38:48:30.3 17.7mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski) 18:50:00.14 -32:49:30.1 15.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:45:22.67 -74:00:48.7 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:11:01.24 +35:21:17.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 21:43:04.76 +20:30:41.1 17.9mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:35:50.31 +25:20:23.2 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:08:41.13 +38:46:36.7 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:38:09.73 +40:51:33.6 17.5mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:42:28.50 -13:31:00.8 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 14:17:08.90 -04:43:09.4 16.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 20:21:07.50 +51:57:39.5 15.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 13:09:10.86 +17:13:38.9 17.7mag A/2026 E1 15:56:24.45 -66:25:23.1 14.7mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 19:35:44.99 -05:23:30.6 17.1mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS) 10:46:42.83 +02:38:11.4 17.5mag P/2026 U1 (Gafton) 23:25:00.49 +13:36:49.2 16.9mag 2P/Encke 23:28:17.30 -25:17:40.8 15.5mag 10P/Tempel 02:42:01.77 +29:39:17.4 16.5mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:27:12.58 -10:10:22.1 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:10:06.71 -08:59:25.2 15.9mag 65P/Gunn 08:01:28.29 +13:25:03.8 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 20:56:27.66 -24:20:40.7 16.5mag 84P/Giclas 10:41:38.54 +13:13:58.4 17.6mag 93P/Lovas 09:05:21.41 +46:18:38.8 16.8mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:54:17.80 +04:56:49.8 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 12:30:09.68 +07:40:09.0 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 23:26:15.01 -00:56:57.0 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 19:45:11.56 +14:50:55.1 10.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 11:15:39.65 -03:24:18.5 16.3mag 169P/NEAT 09:42:15.98 +23:25:15.7 18.0mag 186P/Garradd 03:09:04.69 +02:04:19.2 15.4mag 220P/McNaught 06:22:41.93 +50:03:17.4 15.9mag 260P/McNaught 07:58:11.39 +25:02:44.1 17.5mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Nov 4 21:16 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:58:35.28 +22:20:06.50 ASASSN-26fs 2026-11-2.4 12.31 02:29:41.13 -71:57:55.60 ASASSN-26fr 2026-11-1.22 13.7 21:27:22.43 -18:15:42.10 SN 2026agsu 2026-10-29.85 -1.08 17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92 10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27 21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82 01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9 01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88 00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77 22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42 01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3 18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Nov 4 21:16 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag 05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag 05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Nov 4 21:16 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 17:54:06.374 +65:12:07.03 AT 2026afyn 2026-09-27.00 27.53 17:54:12.378 +65:11:36.46 AT 2026afym 2026-09-27.00 27.72 17:54:06.270 +65:11:07.40 AT 2026afyl 2026-09-27.00 25.92 17:53:27.005 +65:10:54.26 AT 2026afyk 2026-09-27.00 27.33 17:54:11.180 +65:09:41.88 AT 2026afyj 2026-09-27.00 26.3 17:53:38.059 +65:08:44.42 AT 2026afyi 2026-09-27.00 27.21 17:54:21.568 +65:08:31.22 AT 2026afyh 2026-09-27.00 24.81 17:54:22.489 +65:08:12.98 AT 2026afyg 2026-09-27.00 27.34 17:54:12.363 +65:07:56.68 AT 2026afyf 2026-09-27.00 25.37 17:53:32.198 +65:12:13.26 AT 2026afye 2026-08-07.00 27.52 17:54:17.450 +65:10:55.80 AT 2026afyd 2026-08-07.00 26.19 17:53:34.001 +65:15:33.76 AT 2026afyc 2026-05-27.00 27.28 17:53:39.791 +65:16:43.84 AT 2026afyb 2026-03-28.00 26.7 01:07:23.505 +32:00:53.10 AT 2026afya 2026-10-11.48 20.5 06:56:31.236 +52:33:55.44 AT 2026afxz 2026-10-06.58 20.74 04:59:34.078 -09:52:21.92 AT 2026afxy 2026-10-12.52 19.8 01:14:09.805 -13:39:55.41 AT 2026afxx 2026-10-06.43 19.69 03:41:26.334 -01:30:43.79 AT 2026afxw 2026-10-19.42 20.5509 08:32:00.397 +26:40:21.34 AT 2026afxv 2026-10-16.45 19.9231 10:01:37.234 +18:45:25.97 AT 2026afxu 2026-10-20.53 19.8573 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Nov 4 21:16 tns_transients_list.txt
JD 2461032.80049: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461032.80097: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61547: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.61615: SE_FLAGS=0.
