######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5 FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3 ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES_HIGH_PRIORITY_EXTRA= default.sex.telephoto_lens_vTTU HIGH_PRIORITY_FIELDS= Sco6 Oph-08-Q1b1x1 Oph-08-Q2b1x1 Sco-04-Q1b1x1 Sco-04-Q2b1x1 Sgr-04-Q1b1x1 Sgr-04-Q2b1x1 242 STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=local (lib/catalogs/local_star_catalog -> local copy: Gaia DR2 gaia_source, G < 19.0, built from https://cdn.gea.esac.esa.int/Gaia/gdr2/gaia_source/csv on 2026-11-04) The APASS known-star check of the candidates is disabled (see the note in util/transients/report_transient.sh) WARNING: VizieR is unreachable (no mirror answered the test query) - the online identification of candidates is degraded for this run INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Dra-09-Q2b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Dra-09-Q2b1x1 ########### Processing Dra-09-Q2b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 684048 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 684048 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits_preview.png'
Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits
renamed 'Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits_preview.png'
Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. Field altitude during imaging: 19.8 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits Field altitude during imaging: 19.7 deg (FITS keyword CENTALT) Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 385.2809 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 474.2397 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1319.3115 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 474.6246 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1319.9477 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 474.2864 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.42428 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 12.3000001907349 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 12.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-04T20:14:29.2839927' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T02:14:29.2839927' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.0933944792 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T02:14:39.1839722' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.0935090627 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 232.939009302171 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 53.9997605884927 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 19.8166666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 322.3975 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.92747416580226 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Dra-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 31 46' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20697 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20697 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 12.3000001907349 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 12.3000001907349 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 8.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 73.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.61 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 12.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 8.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.0004 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/d_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits :) Spent 0.528556 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/d_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 12.3699998855591 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 12.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-11-04T20:15:24.3270862' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-11-05T02:15:24.3270862' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61349.0940315626 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-11-05T02:15:34.2308417' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61349.0941461804 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 232.939009326692 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 53.9997606466176 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 19.6980555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 322.472222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.94409496033167 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Dra-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 31 46' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20697 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20697 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 12.3699998855591 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 12.3699998855591 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 8.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 73.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 896.61 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 12.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 8.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.0004 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/d_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits :) Spent 0.578931 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/d_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits
fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461349.59351022 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:31:47.864 +54:00:02.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits Image size: 938.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:31:46.854 +53:59:58.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:31:47.864 +54:00:02.13 Second-epoch image center 15:31:46.854 +53:59:58.63 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0027 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits Image size: 938.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:31:46.953 +53:59:25.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:31:47.864 +54:00:02.13 Second-epoch image center 15:31:46.953 +53:59:25.99 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0103 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 15:31:46.854 +53:59:58.63 Second-epoch second image center 15:31:46.953 +53:59:25.99 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00907 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MOXCV25bjf Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3Zxg8wb1az Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eAtiMMYZJ0 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zlekaX1W8w Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8363 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1962 to 247.8655 deg, Dec +48.2431 to +59.2440 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1962 to 247.8655 deg, Dec 48.2431 to 59.2440 deg Loaded 6138 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4426 out of 4578 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4578 out of 8363 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.754150 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.754150 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.12 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8363 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1962 to 247.8655 deg, Dec +48.2431 to +59.2440 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1962 to 247.8655 deg, Dec 48.2431 to 59.2440 deg Loaded 6138 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4426 out of 4578 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4578 out of 8363 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits (aperture=6.4) Read 8357 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1964 to 247.8654 deg, Dec +48.2430 to +59.2441 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1964 to 247.8654 deg, Dec 48.2430 to 59.2441 deg Loaded 6138 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4429 out of 4579 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4579 out of 8357 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits 2.3 pix Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits 2.3 pix fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits 2.3 pix fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits 15.6 mag. Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits 15.0 mag. fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits 15.0 mag. fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.MOXCV25bjf (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=459, bad_region=1718, passed=8363 Got 8363 stars (including 6277 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8363 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6967 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6967 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6967 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5340) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=1712 n_q2=811 n_q3=1553 n_q4=779 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4855 N_valid=4855 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.016 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.265 p95_sep_arcsec=0.816 n_q1=1712 n_q2=811 n_q3=1553 n_q4=779 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.3Zxg8wb1az (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=460, bad_region=1712, passed=8357 Got 8357 stars (including 6274 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8357 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6968 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6968 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6968 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4849 stars left (next iteration limit 5335) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits N_match=4849 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=1711 n_q2=810 n_q3=1542 n_q4=786 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4849 N_valid=4849 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.029 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.275 p95_sep_arcsec=0.802 n_q1=1711 n_q2=810 n_q3=1542 n_q4=786 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.eAtiMMYZJ0 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=290, bad_region=925, passed=5364 Got 5364 stars (including 4191 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5364 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4083 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4077 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4077 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4077 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4623 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4083 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4077 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4623 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4077 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4623 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4077 stars left (next iteration limit 4484) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4077 robust_rms=7.403 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.438 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.438 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4077 robust_rms=0.480 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.590 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.590 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4077 robust_rms=0.372 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.454 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.454 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4077 robust_rms_before=0.658 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.310 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.372 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.436 worst_region_rms_after=0.454 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.719 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.454 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.436 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.436 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.310 arcsec matched=4077 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits N_match=4077 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=1446 n_q2=693 n_q3=1323 n_q4=615 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.040 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4077 N_valid=4077 bias_ra_arcsec=0.349 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.034 median_sep_arcsec=0.586 p95_sep_arcsec=1.282 n_q1=1446 n_q2=693 n_q3=1323 n_q4=615 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.zlekaX1W8w (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=272, bad_region=913, passed=5376 Got 5376 stars (including 4227 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5376 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4109 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4103 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4103 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4649 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4109 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4103 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4649 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4103 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4649 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4103 stars left (next iteration limit 4513) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4103 robust_rms=7.349 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.035 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.035 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4103 robust_rms=0.454 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.563 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.563 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4103 robust_rms=0.374 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.435 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.434 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4103 robust_rms_before=0.628 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.307 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.374 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.433 worst_region_rms_after=0.435 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.719 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.434 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.433 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.433 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.307 arcsec matched=4103 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits N_match=4103 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.310 n_q1=1436 n_q2=694 n_q3=1341 n_q4=632 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.019 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4103 N_valid=4103 bias_ra_arcsec=0.346 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.034 median_sep_arcsec=0.543 p95_sep_arcsec=1.207 n_q1=1436 n_q2=694 n_q3=1341 n_q4=632 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits sigma_overall=0.324 worst_q_ratio=1.146 ref2=Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.142 new1=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits sigma_overall=0.323 worst_q_ratio=1.040 new2=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits sigma_overall=0.312 worst_q_ratio=1.019 reference average sigma_overall=0.3275 worst_q_ratio=1.144 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313_astrometric_residuals.png (4855 matched stars from wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314_astrometric_residuals.png (4849 matched stars from wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094_astrometric_residuals.png (4077 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095_astrometric_residuals.png (4103 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:31:47.864 +54:00:02.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits Image size: 938.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:31:46.854 +53:59:58.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:31:47.864 +54:00:02.13 Second-epoch image center 15:31:46.854 +53:59:58.63 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0027 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits Image size: 938.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 15:31:46.953 +53:59:25.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 15:31:47.864 +54:00:02.13 Second-epoch image center 15:31:46.953 +53:59:25.99 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0103 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 15:31:46.854 +53:59:58.63 Second-epoch second image center 15:31:46.953 +53:59:25.99 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00907 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9ZKLY2Yz8q Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gXengyotWa Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits &> /tmp/tmp.snqqMgaKZ3 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KOXGnPrLPG Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 43365 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1458 to 248.0284 deg, Dec +48.1633 to +59.2687 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1458 to 248.0284 deg, Dec 48.1633 to 59.2687 deg Loaded 6236 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4201 out of 4603 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4603 out of 43365 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.630300 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.630300 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.84 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.79 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.79
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 43365 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1458 to 248.0284 deg, Dec +48.1633 to +59.2687 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1458 to 248.0284 deg, Dec 48.1633 to 59.2687 deg Loaded 6236 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4201 out of 4603 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4603 out of 43365 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits (aperture=4.9) Read 43531 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1459 to 248.0294 deg, Dec +48.1632 to +59.2726 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1459 to 248.0294 deg, Dec 48.1632 to 59.2726 deg Loaded 6241 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4225 out of 4601 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4601 out of 43531 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits (aperture=4.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 51 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits 2.2 pix Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits 2.3 pix fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits 2.3 pix fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.8 mag. Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits 15.8 mag. Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.9ZKLY2Yz8q (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=1952, bad_region=6920, passed=43342 Got 43342 stars (including 34785 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43342 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38015 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38015 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38015 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4851 stars left (next iteration limit 5335) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits N_match=4851 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=1720 n_q2=824 n_q3=1514 n_q4=793 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4851 N_valid=4851 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.030 bias_dec_arcsec=0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.262 p95_sep_arcsec=0.825 n_q1=1720 n_q2=824 n_q3=1514 n_q4=793 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.gXengyotWa (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1994, bad_region=6965, passed=43516 Got 43516 stars (including 34870 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43516 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4847 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38161 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38161 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4847 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38161 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4847 stars left (next iteration limit 5331) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits N_match=4847 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=1720 n_q2=833 n_q3=1504 n_q4=790 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.138 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4847 N_valid=4847 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.041 bias_dec_arcsec=0.011 median_sep_arcsec=0.273 p95_sep_arcsec=0.803 n_q1=1720 n_q2=833 n_q3=1504 n_q4=790 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.snqqMgaKZ3 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1126, bad_region=3474, passed=28868 Got 28868 stars (including 24534 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28868 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4818 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26214 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26214 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26214 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4818 stars left (next iteration limit 5299) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4818 robust_rms=7.168 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.572 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.572 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4818 robust_rms=0.485 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.601 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.601 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4818 robust_rms=0.376 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.438 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.438 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4818 robust_rms_before=0.662 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.312 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.376 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.429 worst_region_rms_after=0.438 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.711 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.438 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.429 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.429 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.312 arcsec matched=4818 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits N_match=4818 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=1737 n_q2=759 n_q3=1608 n_q4=714 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.036 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4818 N_valid=4818 bias_ra_arcsec=0.351 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.018 median_sep_arcsec=0.589 p95_sep_arcsec=1.288 n_q1=1737 n_q2=759 n_q3=1608 n_q4=714 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.KOXGnPrLPG (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1071, bad_region=3341, passed=28464 Got 28464 stars (including 24273 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28464 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4823 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25938 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25938 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25938 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4822 stars left (next iteration limit 5305) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4822 robust_rms=7.107 arcsec worst_region_rms=11.885 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.885 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4822 robust_rms=0.453 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.580 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.580 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4822 robust_rms=0.375 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.439 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.430 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4822 robust_rms_before=0.630 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.316 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.375 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.417 worst_region_rms_after=0.439 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.706 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.430 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.417 arcsec) - keeping the original SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.417 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.316 arcsec matched=4822 WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits N_match=4822 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1734 n_q2=763 n_q3=1600 n_q4=725 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.025 WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4822 N_valid=4822 bias_ra_arcsec=0.348 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.028 median_sep_arcsec=0.548 p95_sep_arcsec=1.216 n_q1=1734 n_q2=763 n_q3=1600 n_q4=725 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 15:50:47.34 +49:42:08.5: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:04:29.92 +51:27:53.2: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:03:00.20 +51:11:35.9: 10.29 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:08:56.68 +50:44:16.6: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:07:23.24 +50:58:23.0: 15.12 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:04:29.92 +51:27:53.2: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:03:00.20 +51:11:35.9: 10.26 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:08:56.68 +50:44:16.6: 14.17 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:09:56.45 +50:19:21.0: 15.35 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 15:50:47.34 +49:42:08.5: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.27 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:29.92 +51:27:53.2: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8473 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:56.68 +50:44:16.6: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0261 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:00.20 +51:11:35.9: ref_mag=10.27 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5327 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:07:23.24 +50:58:23.0: 15.36 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:47.34 +49:42:08.5: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9548 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:23.24 +50:58:23.0: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5024 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:09:56.45 +50:19:21.0: 15.48 +/- 0.24 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:56.45 +50:19:21.0: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7497 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52674_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 52674_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checksDiscovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 14.17 15:49:18.00 +51:04:10.1 3153 4941 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 15:49:18.00 +51:04:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52679_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 52679_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=2.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.70 16:15:37.19 +56:04:05.1 1062 1707 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52683_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 52683_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 12.70 15:38:19.41 +50:20:20.0 4193 5408 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 15:38:19.45 +50:20:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52684_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 52684_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.09351 2461349.59351 10.66 16:03:00.25 +51:11:35.8 1854 4788 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 10.43 16:03:00.15 +51:11:35.9 1854 4782 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52709_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 52709_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 11.14 16:18:37.61 +57:32:59.3 0940 0773 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52719_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 52719_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 11.53 16:19:40.02 +55:59:37.9 0711 1700 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52725_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 52725_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 11.79 16:11:57.49 +52:24:02.5 1093 3964 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52735_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 52735_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 11.97 16:16:16.92 +51:36:39.8 0623 4390 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 16:16:16.95 +51:36:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52806_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 52806_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=3.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=3.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 12.65 16:12:37.20 +55:29:19.7 1272 2092 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52842_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 52842_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.01 16:12:56.15 +51:45:20.3 0951 4343 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52873_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 52873_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.04 16:12:59.95 +51:22:46.2 0915 4570 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52882_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 52882_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.05 16:17:57.72 +54:03:43.6 0684 2888 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52932_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 52932_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.11 15:20:04.99 +51:59:23.5 5895 4363 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 15:20:05.00 +51:59:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52937_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 52937_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.28 16:20:25.30 +56:31:00.4 0696 1374 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52952_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 52952_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.37 16:15:09.96 +51:45:40.7 0741 4313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52981_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 52981_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.32 16:13:57.78 +55:08:13.2 1128 2289 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53010_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53010_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.44 16:12:42.88 +55:58:49.1 1302 1794 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53013_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53013_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.31 15:38:33.74 +50:23:47.9 4170 5373 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 15:38:33.77 +50:23:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53026_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53026_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.67 16:14:58.30 +55:03:39.1 1034 2323 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53028_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53028_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.47 15:06:08.35 +54:32:09.3 7027 2723 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 15:06:08.31 +54:32:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53029_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53029_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.70 16:15:17.83 +57:08:51.5 1179 1058 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53030_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53030_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.51 16:12:32.19 +57:10:25.2 1409 1074 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53062_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53062_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.78 16:15:55.09 +53:14:38.6 0797 3408 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 16:15:55.13 +53:14:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53072_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53072_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.71 16:18:26.90 +56:35:06.4 0868 1359 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53094_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53094_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.09351 2461349.59351 13.86 16:04:29.92 +51:27:52.3 1728 4610 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.84 16:04:29.93 +51:27:54.2 1728 4605 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53097_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53097_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=1.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.71 15:42:32.68 +54:32:48.1 3841 2858 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 15:42:32.71 +54:32:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53098_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53098_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 14.00 15:52:24.83 +55:48:30.3 3019 2062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 15:52:25.03 +55:48:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53102_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53102_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=1.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.67 16:19:34.41 +57:28:05.3 0855 0810 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53114_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53114_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.09351 2461349.59351 13.89 15:50:47.26 +49:42:09.1 2968 5771 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 14.04 15:50:47.43 +49:42:07.8 2968 5766 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53124_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53124_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.89 16:14:01.30 +50:08:42.8 0716 5307 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53131_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53131_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.91 16:13:46.86 +54:08:28.8 1064 2892 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53137_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53137_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 14.16 16:11:42.21 +53:14:40.3 1181 3457 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53139_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53139_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.09351 2461349.59351 14.01 16:08:56.58 +50:44:16.1 1255 5009 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 14.04 16:08:56.78 +50:44:17.0 1255 5003 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53142_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53142_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 14.15 15:36:08.06 +54:37:53.9 4403 2812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 15:36:08.01 +54:37:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53144_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53144_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 14.20 16:14:42.45 +53:45:36.4 0950 3111 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53165_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53165_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.94 15:35:59.50 +52:03:03.1 4417 4371 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 15:35:59.53 +52:03:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53183_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53183_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 14.13 16:17:58.97 +56:23:35.4 0890 1481 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53191_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53191_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.86 15:43:32.96 +51:04:32.6 3700 4955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 15:43:32.90 +51:04:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53240_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53240_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 14.33 16:16:55.14 +57:51:15.8 1106 0610 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53248_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53248_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.09351 2461349.59351 14.39 16:07:23.32 +50:58:23.2 1421 4881 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 14.73 16:07:23.15 +50:58:22.9 1421 4876 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53269_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53269_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 14.41 16:14:08.83 +50:59:39.1 0774 4790 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53301_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53301_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 14.52 16:13:48.82 +54:39:09.7 1102 2583 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53323_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53323_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 14.64 16:16:39.56 +52:50:14.0 0694 3644 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53338_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53338_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 14.74 15:49:46.82 +52:17:40.8 3143 4197 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
**** FOUND 15:49:46.80 +52:17:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53342_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53342_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 14.48 16:00:09.18 +50:26:08.2 2086 5265 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53388_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53388_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 1 2026 11 05.09351 2461349.59351 14.78 16:09:56.47 +50:19:21.8 1128 5250 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-14-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0094.fits Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 14.74 16:09:56.44 +50:19:20.2 1128 5245 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53397_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53397_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 15.04 15:56:37.55 +57:53:25.8 2750 0776 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53410_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 53410_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 2 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 14.78 15:58:39.91 +57:10:38.0 2552 1196 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 08555_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 08555_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 13.37 15:52:37.13 +56:58:47.3 3042 1351 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51330_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 51330_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461173.83300: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461173.83346: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 12.19 15:04:58.16 +57:24:20.3 6939 0981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 39038_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 The candidate 39038_fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095 did not pass the final checks
JD 2461173.83346: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.Discovery image 3 2026 11 05.09415 2461349.59415 12.01 16:07:21.00 +51:02:12.6 1429 4838 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_201956_TTUQ2b1x1_2493347_byaznClD/fd_Dra-09-Q2b1x1_2026-11-04_20-15-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0095.fits SExtractor measurement flags:
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Dra-09-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.59351022 -observatory V36 14:34:39.74 -15:22:11.0 Mercury (6.5mag) 13:23:26.83 -12:55:51.5 Venus (-4.4mag) 09:32:56.95 +16:19:23.7 Mars (0.8mag) 09:47:51.51 +14:02:34.0 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:36:02.35 +00:58:27.1 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:08:45.54 +20:49:25.1 Uranus (5.6mag) 00:08:12.49 -00:39:03.1 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:24:32.26 -23:41:15.6 Pluto (14.5mag) 11:29:09.52 +00:16:03.8 Moon (-9.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Nov 4 20:28 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.59351022: 09:47:46.28 +14:03:05.0 Io (6.0mag) 09:47:59.15 +14:01:49.1 Europa (6.1mag) 09:47:41.19 +14:03:34.9 Ganymede (5.5mag) 09:48:20.81 +13:59:48.2 Callisto (6.8mag) 09:49:25.74 +14:10:55.2 Himalia (15.5mag) 09:47:54.00 +14:02:20.2 Thebe (16.3mag) 09:47:43.47 +14:27:39.1 Elara (17.4mag) 09:48:28.58 +13:30:53.4 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 09:44:46.51 +14:34:44.4 Carme (18.7mag) 00:36:14.46 +00:58:10.3 Titan (8.3mag) 00:35:56.31 +00:58:21.2 Rhea (9.6mag) 00:36:35.11 +00:59:26.3 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:35:57.78 +00:57:57.1 Hyperion (14.2mag) 00:34:15.61 +00:46:21.6 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Nov 4 20:28 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461349.59351022: 04:41:06.27 +16:51:40.4 JWST 18:40:05.31 +13:56:56.4 Chandra 05:09:11.34 +44:18:46.0 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Nov 4 20:28 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461349.59351022 -observatory V36 03:32:23.41 +19:54:18.8 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 07:47:08.28 +38:30:23.8 17.8mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill) 07:47:13.66 +38:30:10.9 17.8mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill) 07:46:31.90 +38:30:31.4 17.8mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill) 05:01:26.54 +38:48:44.2 17.7mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski) 18:49:58.65 -32:49:32.7 15.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:45:22.62 -74:00:43.7 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:11:01.60 +35:21:15.6 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 21:43:05.02 +20:30:51.2 17.9mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:35:50.22 +25:20:23.1 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:08:41.05 +38:46:25.1 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 18:38:08.83 +40:51:34.2 17.5mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 05:42:28.97 -13:31:02.7 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 14:17:07.43 -04:43:03.4 16.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 20:21:02.67 +51:58:32.7 15.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 13:09:09.62 +17:13:27.6 17.7mag A/2026 E1 15:56:27.69 -66:24:41.0 14.7mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard) 19:35:43.69 -05:23:29.6 17.1mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS) 10:46:41.12 +02:38:22.9 17.5mag P/2026 U1 (Gafton) 23:25:03.54 +13:37:09.9 16.9mag 2P/Encke 23:28:15.65 -25:18:03.1 15.5mag 10P/Tempel 02:42:00.36 +29:39:59.8 16.5mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR 12:27:11.77 -10:10:15.8 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 00:10:07.15 -08:59:26.8 15.9mag 65P/Gunn 08:01:27.31 +13:25:11.5 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels 20:56:25.65 -24:20:49.0 16.5mag 84P/Giclas 10:41:36.96 +13:14:09.8 17.6mag 93P/Lovas 09:05:17.08 +46:18:21.8 16.8mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 09:54:15.34 +04:57:19.9 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 12:30:07.13 +07:40:26.5 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley 23:26:15.15 -00:56:55.1 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 19:45:14.38 +14:50:35.6 10.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 11:15:36.92 -03:24:04.8 16.3mag 169P/NEAT 09:42:15.45 +23:25:19.2 18.0mag 186P/Garradd 03:09:05.97 +02:04:24.3 15.4mag 220P/McNaught 06:22:41.95 +50:03:03.5 15.9mag 260P/McNaught 07:58:10.07 +25:02:45.3 17.5mag 266P/Christensen -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.9K Nov 4 20:28 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 00:58:35.28 +22:20:06.50 ASASSN-26fs 2026-11-2.4 12.31 02:29:41.13 -71:57:55.60 ASASSN-26fr 2026-11-1.22 13.7 21:27:22.43 -18:15:42.10 SN 2026agsu 2026-10-29.85 -1.08 17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92 10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27 21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82 01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9 01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88 00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77 22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42 01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3 18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23 21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83 03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75 04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52 09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93 02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85 02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61 22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56 15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91 08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82 21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94 20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42 00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57 21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65 04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73 05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04 19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84 00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41 23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32 16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02 23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89 16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58 16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4 23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17 21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh ------- 08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67 02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93 02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26 04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27 17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14 03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78 01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27 20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87 22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48 22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93 00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02 00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51 19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63 00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59 19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37 18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89 17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87 19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Nov 4 20:28 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag 00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag 00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag 17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag 00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag 08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag 00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag 18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag 00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag 22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag 22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag 00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag 01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag 17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag 09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag 00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag 04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag 05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag 05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Nov 4 20:28 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 17:53:38.059 +65:08:44.42 AT 2026afyi 2026-09-27.00 27.21 17:54:21.568 +65:08:31.22 AT 2026afyh 2026-09-27.00 24.81 17:54:22.489 +65:08:12.98 AT 2026afyg 2026-09-27.00 27.34 17:54:12.363 +65:07:56.68 AT 2026afyf 2026-09-27.00 25.37 17:53:32.198 +65:12:13.26 AT 2026afye 2026-08-07.00 27.52 17:54:17.450 +65:10:55.80 AT 2026afyd 2026-08-07.00 26.19 17:53:34.001 +65:15:33.76 AT 2026afyc 2026-05-27.00 27.28 17:53:39.791 +65:16:43.84 AT 2026afyb 2026-03-28.00 26.7 01:07:23.505 +32:00:53.10 AT 2026afya 2026-10-11.48 20.5 06:56:31.236 +52:33:55.44 AT 2026afxz 2026-10-06.58 20.74 04:59:34.078 -09:52:21.92 AT 2026afxy 2026-10-12.52 19.8 01:14:09.805 -13:39:55.41 AT 2026afxx 2026-10-06.43 19.69 03:41:26.334 -01:30:43.79 AT 2026afxw 2026-10-19.42 20.5509 08:32:00.397 +26:40:21.34 AT 2026afxv 2026-10-16.45 19.9231 10:01:37.234 +18:45:25.97 AT 2026afxu 2026-10-20.53 19.8573 08:45:36.212 +41:19:58.26 AT 2026afxt 2026-10-20.63 19.42 04:00:58.299 -10:16:09.69 AT 2026afxs 2026-10-05.57 20.89 00:26:23.104 -25:15:00.48 AT 2026afxr 2026-10-10.41 20.04 00:41:01.438 -13:28:04.05 AT 2026afxq 2026-10-20.26 20.1648 04:11:43.326 +03:04:54.81 AT 2026afxp 2026-10-18.36 20.3153 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Nov 4 20:28 tns_transients_list.txt
JD 2461173.83300: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461173.83346: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59351: SE_FLAGS=0.
JD 2461349.59415: SE_FLAGS=0.
