This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 11.51 05:04:31.43 +26:06:58.7
177.24850 -9.13113 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales 1 0 1 11.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:31.43 +26:06:58.7: 14.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:31.43 +26:06:58.7: 14.83 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 04.2606* 05 04 31.43 +26 06 58.7 11.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461348.7606,11.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261104.2606 11.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 10.27 04:52:01.72 +29:00:04.0
173.22142 -9.57767 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0720 Tau
Type: LB:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.200 pg 14.700 pg M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:52:01.72 +29:00:04.0: 11.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:52:01.72 +29:00:04.0: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 04.2606* 04 52 01.72 +29 00 04.0 10.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0720 Tau,2461348.7606,10.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0720 Tau 20261104.2606 10.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 8.81 05:19:01.80 +24:45:52.6
180.27724 -7.24324 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" NSV 1919
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.670 V Y 0.440 V 2453365.00000 209.976089000000 M6.5
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:19:01.80 +24:45:52.6: 9.74 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:19:01.80 +24:45:52.6: 9.75 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.74 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 04.2606* 05 19 01.80 +24 45 52.6 8.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 1919,2461348.7606,8.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 1919 20261104.2606 8.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 13.64 05:29:57.37 +24:55:57.3
181.52178 -5.08896 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.4" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 05:29:57.37 +24:55:57.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:29:57.37 +24:55:57.3: 15.06 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:29:57.37 +24:55:57.3: 14.99 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 04.2606* 05 29 57.37 +24 55 57.3 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461348.7606,13.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261104.2606 13.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 13.48 04:56:50.86 +33:51:30.7
170.02428 -5.75483 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.0" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 04:56:50.86 +33:51:30.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:56:50.86 +33:51:30.7: 14.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:56:50.86 +33:51:30.7: 14.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461348.7606,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261104.2606 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 13.22 05:31:33.36 +24:40:20.1
181.93947 -4.92631 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 05:31:33.36 +24:40:20.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:31:33.36 +24:40:20.1: 15.24 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:31:33.36 +24:40:20.1: 15.45 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.17
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 04.2606* 05 31 33.36 +24 40 20.1 13.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461348.7606,13.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261104.2606 13.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 12.71 05:31:57.55 +27:21:35.4
179.72806 -3.38780 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 4.8 pix
The object was found in VSX18" Gaia DR3 3442299056614752128
Type: DSCT|GDOR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.110 G 12.140 G B
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:31:57.55 +27:21:35.4: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:31:57.55 +27:21:35.4: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 04.2606* 05 31 57.55 +27 21 35.4 12.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3442299056614752128,2461348.7606,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3442299056614752128 20261104.2606 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 12.76 04:28:15.59 +29:56:35.1
169.07616 -12.91213 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.224 Oceana -0 0 0 12.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:28:15.59 +29:56:35.1: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:28:15.59 +29:56:35.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 04.2606* 04 28 15.59 +29 56 35.1 12.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461348.7606,12.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261104.2606 12.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 13.42 05:07:58.49 +31:38:03.1
173.22655 -5.24518 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.359 Georgia 2 1 2 13.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:07:58.49 +31:38:03.1: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:07:58.49 +31:38:03.1: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461348.7606,13.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261104.2606 13.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 13.38 05:34:28.52 +31:17:35.4
176.72279 -0.78905 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 5.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" ZTF J053429.00+311736.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.413 r Y 0.658 r 2458405.54520 223.740858400000 M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:34:28.52 +31:17:35.4: 15.30 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:34:28.52 +31:17:35.4: 15.34 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.13
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J053429.00+311736.8,2461348.7606,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J053429.00+311736.8 20261104.2606 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 14.14 04:36:15.34 +30:28:08.6
169.84786 -11.27153 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1189 Terentia -1 -0 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:36:15.34 +30:28:08.6: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:36:15.34 +30:28:08.6: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 04.2606* 04 36 15.34 +30 28 08.6 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461348.7606,14.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261104.2606 14.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 13.65 04:47:18.85 +32:18:19.7
169.97687 -8.28407 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 04:47:18.85 +32:18:19.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:47:18.85 +32:18:19.7: 14.80 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:47:18.85 +32:18:19.7: 14.62 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461348.7606,13.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261104.2606 13.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 12.57 05:17:43.22 +25:25:05.3
179.56513 -7.11739 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 5.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 7" V1215 Tau
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.200 V < 18.200 V 2456338.00000 510.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:17:43.22 +25:25:05.3: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:17:43.22 +25:25:05.3: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 04.2606* 05 17 43.22 +25 25 05.3 12.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1215 Tau,2461348.7606,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1215 Tau 20261104.2606 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 13.76 05:32:36.82 +31:27:01.5
176.37467 -1.03700 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" ASASSN-V J053237.30+312701.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.230 g Y 0.850 g 2459310.64200 735.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:32:36.82 +31:27:01.5: 14.82 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:32:36.82 +31:27:01.5: 14.91 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J053237.30+312701.9,2461348.7606,13.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J053237.30+312701.9 20261104.2606 13.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 12.66 05:25:51.48 +25:45:32.5
180.31719 -5.40740 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.0" and 6.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" ASASSN-V J052551.78+254535.1
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.180 V 14.640 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:25:51.48 +25:45:32.5: 13.73 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:25:51.48 +25:45:32.5: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 04.2606* 05 25 51.48 +25 45 32.5 12.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J052551.78+254535.1,2461348.7606,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J052551.78+254535.1 20261104.2606 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 13.67 04:30:24.32 +28:19:16.4
170.63789 -13.64673 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 5.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 6" NSVS J0430243+281911
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.691 R1 Y 0.497 R1 94.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:30:24.32 +28:19:16.4: 14.74 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:30:24.32 +28:19:16.4: 14.59 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 04.2606* 04 30 24.32 +28 19 16.4 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0430243+281911,2461348.7606,13.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0430243+281911 20261104.2606 13.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 13.30 05:36:13.52 +32:12:40.0
176.15143 0.02002 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 5.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 9" NSVS J0536150+321229
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.570 g Y 0.880 g 2459467.02700 142.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:36:13.52 +32:12:40.0: 14.80 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:36:13.52 +32:12:40.0: 14.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0536150+321229,2461348.7606,13.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0536150+321229 20261104.2606 13.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 13.68 05:05:16.10 +34:31:18.6
170.56524 -3.97113 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 5.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ZTF J050516.19+343115.3
Type: RS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.440 r Y 0.080 r 2458523.69630 0.435471000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:05:16.10 +34:31:18.6: 14.62 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:05:16.10 +34:31:18.6: 14.66 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J050516.19+343115.3,2461348.7606,13.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J050516.19+343115.3 20261104.2606 13.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 13.37 05:18:23.68 +27:30:34.2
177.92064 -5.80340 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.9" and 3.7 pix
The object was found in VSX24" Gaia DR3 3421443829295283840
Type: RS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.750 G 13.880 G G
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:18:23.68 +27:30:34.2: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:18:23.68 +27:30:34.2: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 04.2606* 05 18 23.68 +27 30 34.2 13.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3421443829295283840,2461348.7606,13.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3421443829295283840 20261104.2606 13.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 12.42 05:07:11.48 +29:09:18.6
175.13171 -6.85297 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 5.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0507115+290917
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.601 R1 Y 0.400 R1 167.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:07:11.48 +29:09:18.6: 13.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:07:11.48 +29:09:18.6: 13.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0507115+290917,2461348.7606,12.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0507115+290917 20261104.2606 12.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 13.58 04:41:46.78 +31:41:53.3
169.68488 -9.57340 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 04:41:46.78 +31:41:53.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:41:46.78 +31:41:53.3: 14.53 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:41:46.78 +31:41:53.3: 14.51 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461348.7606,13.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261104.2606 13.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 13.38 05:11:35.42 +31:14:05.1
174.00738 -4.85870 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.7" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 05:11:35.42 +31:14:05.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:11:35.42 +31:14:05.1: 14.39 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:11:35.42 +31:14:05.1: 14.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461348.7606,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261104.2606 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 13.24 05:30:17.60 +24:42:57.0
181.74605 -5.14317 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 4.9 pix
The object was found in VSX10" ASASSN-V J053018.07+244249.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.320 g Y 0.510 g 2458771.87000 588.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:30:17.60 +24:42:57.0: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:30:17.60 +24:42:57.0: 14.34 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 04.2606* 05 30 17.60 +24 42 57.0 13.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J053018.07+244249.7,2461348.7606,13.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J053018.07+244249.7 20261104.2606 13.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 13.15 04:46:06.07 +31:22:53.4
170.53058 -9.07177 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.2 pix
The object was found in VSX10" Gaia DR3 159504644308215808
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.260 G 17.460 G M
ATTENTION: measured mag 13.15 is 4.1 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 17.26 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:46:06.07 +31:22:53.4: 14.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:46:06.07 +31:22:53.4: 14.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 159504644308215808,2461348.7606,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 159504644308215808 20261104.2606 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 13.23 05:33:24.80 +28:12:58.6
179.18357 -2.65208 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 5.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 8" Gaia DR3 3442367359479512832
Type: SR|M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.230 G 12.550 G 509.900000000000 M
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:33:24.80 +28:12:58.6: 14.25 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:33:24.80 +28:12:58.6: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 04.2606* 05 33 24.80 +28 12 58.6 13.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3442367359479512832,2461348.7606,13.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3442367359479512832 20261104.2606 13.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 13.11 05:34:31.56 +32:13:04.4
175.95150 -0.27876 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 05:34:31.56 +32:13:04.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:34:31.56 +32:13:04.4: 14.45 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:34:31.56 +32:13:04.4: 14.55 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461348.7606,13.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261104.2606 13.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 04.2606 2461348.7606 9.10 05:22:16.07 +34:39:56.8
172.49659 -1.04946 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" IRAS 05189+3437
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.200 V 10.600 V 2457375.00000 63.090000000000 M5
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:22:16.07 +34:39:56.8: 10.02 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:22:16.07 +34:39:56.8: 10.02 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.02 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
IRAS 05189+3437,2461348.7606,9.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
IRAS 05189+3437 20261104.2606 9.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461348.76091802 04.11.2026 06:15:33.317 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 44
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15340
Objects passed selection criteria: 15312
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13630.2
Average stars matched: 13315.2 (97.689 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 240836 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Nov 4 00:29:00 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
First image: 2461032.80049318 23.12.2025 07:12:32.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Last image: 2461348.76091802 04.11.2026 06:15:33.317 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 349
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 36 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 116660
Objects passed selection criteria: 116437
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 89617.8
Average stars matched: 86008.2 (95.9723 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 578528 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Nov 4 00:30:59 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461348.76026199
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:05.168 +30:00:05.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:05.168 +30:00:05.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0165 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:05.617 +30:00:35.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:01.042 +29:59:39.82
Second-epoch image center 05:00:05.617 +30:00:35.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0226 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:05.168 +30:00:05.19
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:05.617 +30:00:35.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00854 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YhbVPZnIAX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h28ymVdvyi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5CwjAj3Cin
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oLu2tKFqiU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.988300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.988300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6655 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2863 deg
Loaded 8426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6039 out of 6740 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6740 out of 16295 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec +24.3644 to +35.2864 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5633 to 84.6688 deg, Dec 24.3644 to 35.2864 deg
Loaded 8429 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6042 out of 6743 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6743 out of 16349 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 42 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
6.0 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
6.0 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.YhbVPZnIAX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1498, bad_region=0, passed=16295
Got 16295 stars (including 14768 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4801 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits N_match=4801 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=2038 n_q2=976 n_q3=1109 n_q4=678 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4801 N_valid=4801 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.256 p95_sep_arcsec=1.309 n_q1=2038 n_q2=976 n_q3=1109 n_q4=678 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.h28ymVdvyi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1486, bad_region=0, passed=16349
Got 16349 stars (including 14839 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4801 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4838 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4800 stars left (next iteration limit 5281)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits N_match=4800 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=2037 n_q2=978 n_q3=1111 n_q4=674 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4800 N_valid=4800 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.003 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.258 p95_sep_arcsec=1.293 n_q1=2037 n_q2=978 n_q3=1111 n_q4=674 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5CwjAj3Cin (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=598, bad_region=0, passed=10888
Got 10888 stars (including 10290 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10888 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.90"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.91"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.94"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.98"
Excluding outliers - 4782 stars left (next iteration limit 5256)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4782 robust_rms=12.554 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.237 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.237 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4782 robust_rms=0.832 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.394 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.394 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4782 robust_rms=0.787 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.416 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.416 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4782 robust_rms_before=1.252 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.887 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.832 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.636 worst_region_rms_after=1.394 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.148 outer_annulus_rms_after=1.394
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.sip_refit.fRpW4K/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.sip_refit.fRpW4K/candidate.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:05.203 +30:00:04.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 10888 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.sip_refit.fRpW4K/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_3917401.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.sip_refit.fRpW4K/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.19IujR' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_3917401.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 1.252 -> 0.832 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 4.2 arcsec, 4782 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4519 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4519 pairs (4782 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4519 robust_rms=12.146 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.763 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.763 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4519 robust_rms=0.799 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.330 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.330 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4519 robust_rms=0.755 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.314 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.314 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4519 robust_rms_before=0.799 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.799 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.799 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.327 worst_region_rms_after=1.330 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.327 outer_annulus_rms_after=1.330
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 1.330 vs 1.327 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4519 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.83"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4519 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits N_match=4519 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.795 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.731 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.972 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.854 n_q1=661 n_q2=922 n_q3=1037 n_q4=1899 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.221
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4519 N_valid=4519 bias_ra_arcsec=0.018 bias_dec_arcsec=0.022 median_sep_arcsec=0.639 p95_sep_arcsec=2.341 n_q1=661 n_q2=922 n_q3=1037 n_q4=1899 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.oLu2tKFqiU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=627, bad_region=0, passed=11431
Got 11431 stars (including 10803 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11431 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.91"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11431 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.91"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11431 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.94"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11431 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.98"
Excluding outliers - 4780 stars left (next iteration limit 5256)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=12.327 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.059 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.059 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=0.845 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.429 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.429 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4780 robust_rms=0.800 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.410 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.410 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4780 robust_rms_before=1.265 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.902 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.845 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.649 worst_region_rms_after=1.429 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.251 outer_annulus_rms_after=1.429
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.sip_refit.LLfbWw/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.sip_refit.LLfbWw/candidate.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:05.651 +30:00:34.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11431 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.sip_refit.LLfbWw/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_3917453.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.sip_refit.LLfbWw/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.74AUkh' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_3917453.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 3, robust RMS 1.265 -> 0.845 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 4.2 arcsec, 4780 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4528 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4528 pairs (4780 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4528 robust_rms=12.109 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.607 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.607 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4528 robust_rms=0.813 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.340 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.340 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4528 robust_rms=0.771 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.313 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.313 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4528 robust_rms_before=0.813 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.813 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.813 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.340 worst_region_rms_after=1.340 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.340 outer_annulus_rms_after=1.340
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 1.340 vs 1.340 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4528 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11431 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.84"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4528 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits N_match=4528 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.809 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.765 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.972 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.852 n_q1=652 n_q2=942 n_q3=996 n_q4=1938 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4528 N_valid=4528 bias_ra_arcsec=0.031 bias_dec_arcsec=0.019 median_sep_arcsec=0.640 p95_sep_arcsec=2.412 n_q1=652 n_q2=942 n_q3=996 n_q4=1938 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.114
ref2=Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new1=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits sigma_overall=0.795 worst_q_ratio=1.221
new2=fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits sigma_overall=0.809 worst_q_ratio=1.203
reference average sigma_overall=0.37 worst_q_ratio=1.1215
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: not retrying 1st new image (fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits): sigma=0.795 arcsec is inside the 1.48 arcsec floor, so exceeding 2.0x of the reference average sigma is not worth a re-solve; the worst quadrant (ratio=1.221) is within its own threshold too
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: not retrying 2nd new image (fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits): sigma=0.809 arcsec is inside the 1.48 arcsec floor, so exceeding 2.0x of the reference average sigma is not worth a re-solve; the worst quadrant (ratio=1.203) is within its own threshold too
WARNING: 1st new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=0.795 -- 2.15x the reference average (0.37); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 2nd new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=0.809 -- 2.19x the reference average (0.37); plate solution may be of low accuracy
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362_astrometric_residuals.png (4801 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363_astrometric_residuals.png (4800 matched stars from wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054_astrometric_residuals.png (4519 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.58 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055_astrometric_residuals.png (4528 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.57 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-14-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-04_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_001939_TTUQ1b1x1_3813844_H7GRVvVB/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:04:31.43 +26:06:58.7: 14.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:31:10.67 +31:23:37.9: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:21:27.36 +32:24:40.6: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:14:03.98 +33:25:32.9: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:49:37.61 +33:42:39.5: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:24:00.49 +33:51:44.9: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:21:27.36 +32:24:40.6: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:31:10.67 +31:23:37.9: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:04:31.43 +26:06:58.7: 14.83 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:21:27.36 +32:24:40.6: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7202 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:04:31.43 +26:06:58.7: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=11.5088 delta=3.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:10.67 +31:23:37.9: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8766 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 04:52:01.72 +29:00:04.0: 11.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:49:37.61 +33:42:39.5: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:24:00.49 +33:51:44.9: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:14:03.98 +33:25:32.9: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:37.61 +33:42:39.5: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3109 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:00.49 +33:51:44.9: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3150 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:14:03.98 +33:25:32.9: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1389 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 04:52:01.72 +29:00:04.0: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:52:01.72 +29:00:04.0: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.2645 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-12-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0362.fits at 05:19:01.80 +24:45:52.6: 9.74 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-13-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0363.fits at 05:19:01.80 +24:45:52.6: 9.75 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.74 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:19:01.80 +24:45:52.6: ref_mag=9.74 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=8.8126 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11788.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out15255.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21155.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 29s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21119_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21122_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21122_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21148_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21148_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.43 +28:42:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21155_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 21155_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21159_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21159_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:37.46 +29:52:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:21.34 +30:55:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21167_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21167_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:02.53 +30:01:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21171_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21171_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.76 +32:33:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21176_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21176_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:53.60 +27:26:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21183_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21183_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:29.72 +29:26:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21184_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21184_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:11.87 +33:18:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21185_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21185_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:41.50 +34:20:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21188_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21188_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:55.36 +27:35:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21189_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21189_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:05.07 +32:51:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21190_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21190_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:30.45 +33:28:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21191_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21191_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:48.63 +34:11:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21192_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21192_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:25.68 +34:44:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21195_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21195_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21197_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21197_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21203_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21203_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21211_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21211_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:41.19 +33:09:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21215_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21215_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:36.85 +33:40:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04021_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 04021_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:59.66 +33:09:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20856_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 20856_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.98 +31:53:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13740_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 13740_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:16.46 +27:22:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11788_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 11788_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10680_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 10680_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:33.57 +29:20:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05423_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 05423_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:39.23 +32:37:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11712_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 11712_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:35.77 +29:00:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00487_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 00487_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:47.35 +35:02:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15527_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 15527_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.32 +26:08:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 01618_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.21 +34:08:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 08619_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:21.54 +30:42:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15255_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 15255_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09141_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 09141_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:14.49 +30:29:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13154_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 13154_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:47.36 +27:53:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12896_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 12896_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:45.10 +28:01:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04940_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 04940_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:23.99 +32:41:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16039_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 16039_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:16.44 +25:08:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03391_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 03391_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:10.40 +33:22:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05396_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 05396_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:43.64 +32:11:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11604_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 11604_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151164_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151180_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151180_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151183_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151183_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151204_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151204_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151236_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 151236_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151251_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151251_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151258_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151258_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151267_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151267_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151272_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151272_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151275_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151275_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:40.51 +32:45:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151283_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151283_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151296_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151296_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151297_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151297_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151312_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151312_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151359_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151359_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151363_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151363_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151365_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151365_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151375_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151375_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151376_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151376_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151380_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151380_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151388_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151388_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151391_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151391_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151392_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151392_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151398_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151398_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:47.88 +25:24:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151402_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151402_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151403_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151403_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151406_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 151406_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151410_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151410_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151412_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 151412_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151417_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151417_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151423_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151423_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151428_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151428_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151429_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151429_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151442_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151442_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151447_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151447_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151452_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151452_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151458_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151458_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151460_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151460_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151475_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151475_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151486_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151486_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151487_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151487_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151489_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151489_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151491_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151491_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151492_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151492_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151495_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151495_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151501_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151501_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151504_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151504_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151514_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151514_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151524_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151524_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151526_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151526_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151533_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151533_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151538_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151538_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151539_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151539_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:23.69 +24:45:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151548_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151548_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:37.15 +33:23:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151554_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151554_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151563_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 151563_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151565_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151565_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151621_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151621_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151633_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151633_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.76 +32:33:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151637_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151637_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151709_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151709_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151711_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 151711_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151717_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151717_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151724_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151724_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:22.33 +28:31:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151765_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151765_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151797_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151797_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:28.21 +30:16:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151805_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151805_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151812_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151812_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.60 +26:10:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151823_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151823_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151828_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151828_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:09.50 +29:02:26.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#esa_tap#, MAG_MEAN=13.03, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.01)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.831 156526922007481728 074.53933999978 +29.04072866317 11.9056 10.3409 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.831#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151857_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151857_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151866_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151866_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151874_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151874_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151889_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151889_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151903_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151903_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151938_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151938_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151947_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 151947_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151959_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151959_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151961_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151961_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 151982_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 151982_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:46.51 +27:25:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152004_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 152004_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152018_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152018_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152031_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152031_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152062_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152062_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:07.24 +34:19:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152068_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152068_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:44.01 +34:50:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152085_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152085_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:42.67 +34:09:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152104_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152104_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152110_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152110_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152121_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152121_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152132_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152132_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152152_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152152_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:13.72 +30:07:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152169_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 152169_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152180_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152180_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152186_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152186_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152200_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152200_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152201_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152201_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152209_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152209_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152212_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152212_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152223_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152223_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152226_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152226_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152239_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152239_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152243_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152243_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152246_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152246_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152268_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152268_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:56.77 +33:38:41.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#esa_tap#, MAG_MEAN=14.18, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.16)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.623 181237213189374336 080.23731150373 +33.64509653884 13.1478 11.6505 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.623#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152280_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152280_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152286_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152286_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152290_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152290_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152297_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152297_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:06.23 +30:57:02.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#esa_tap#, MAG_MEAN=14.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.248 160001657925062528 073.02501288724 +30.95103474013 13.5956 12.0820 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.248#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152303_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152303_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152307_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152307_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152321_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152321_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152338_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152338_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152351_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152351_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152358_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152358_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152381_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 152381_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97638_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 97638_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:44.30 +25:28:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141163_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 141163_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:25.79 +29:15:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 57253_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.58 +31:18:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18582_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 18582_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:01.82 +33:55:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43613_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 43613_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54729_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 54729_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:02.06 +31:29:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33348_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 33348_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95878_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 95878_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:44.14 +24:57:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57431_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 57431_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:58.17 +31:19:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 33767_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:29.47 +32:44:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94186_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 94186_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:50.13 +24:45:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144901_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 144901_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 39926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:02.87 +32:26:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144771_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 144771_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.14 +32:10:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 82888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:14.76 +29:35:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98052_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 98052_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143994_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 143994_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:37.57 +26:23:15.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#esa_tap#, MAG_MEAN=13.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.936 3421119473365027328 079.90711293696 +26.38752932675 13.2086 11.7309 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.936#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 104277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:50.97 +26:46:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49850_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 49850_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 07731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:26.07 +34:39:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99216_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 99216_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 64643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:21.12 +30:48:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106214_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 106214_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19970_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 19970_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:15.13 +33:49:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121158_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 121158_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:28.76 +27:58:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120278_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 120278_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:18.18 +27:30:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61400_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 61400_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:02.59 +30:45:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 105568_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:47.33 +26:45:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141054_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 141054_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:59.20 +30:06:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 46603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:14.17 +32:02:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140604_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 140604_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:05.14 +34:13:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140439_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 140439_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140161_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 140161_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:12.33 +34:32:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62859_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 62859_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:21.35 +30:55:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 113941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:57.75 +27:26:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110611_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 110611_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:31.46 +26:06:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110580_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 110580_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:01.42 +26:59:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93940_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 93940_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:35.43 +25:01:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16878_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 16878_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:41.72 +33:57:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 96888_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:08.96 +25:22:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 123731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:50.77 +28:10:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09710_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 09710_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 97196_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:49.21 +25:24:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117692_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 117692_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96598_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 96598_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:03.92 +25:01:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110472_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 110472_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:31.12 +27:01:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103574_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 103574_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:44.57 +26:23:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23624_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 23624_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55489_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 55489_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 104960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:45.55 +26:37:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48877_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 48877_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:38.13 +31:55:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10334_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 10334_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:02.58 +34:25:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86413_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 86413_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49463_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 49463_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:45.38 +31:50:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37569_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 37569_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:08.56 +32:28:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09745_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 09745_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76531_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 76531_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:37.46 +29:52:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 121345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:15.43 +28:42:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17435_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 17435_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:52.47 +33:59:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100499_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 100499_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:36.03 +25:44:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 18313_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:11.28 +33:50:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88378_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 88378_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126751_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 126751_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:39.43 +28:00:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 117170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:53.53 +27:26:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78701_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 78701_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76267_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 76267_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:02.56 +30:01:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87050_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 87050_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 28113_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:11.89 +33:18:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12438_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 12438_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:41.51 +34:20:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25439_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 25439_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:30.42 +33:28:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03816_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 03816_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:12.94 +34:57:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52132_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 52132_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34959_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 34959_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:05.08 +32:51:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42434_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 42434_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:47.59 +32:07:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84209_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 84209_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:29.72 +29:26:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23971_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 23971_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37374_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 37374_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91174_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 91174_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:23.97 +28:40:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49024_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 49024_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.99 +31:53:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 101102_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:12.36 +25:58:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76838_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 76838_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:07.80 +29:58:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39496_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 39496_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:17.35 +32:11:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21097_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21097_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:10.86 +33:20:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 01960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:47.33 +35:02:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14454_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 14454_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03761_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 03761_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:30.41 +34:49:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39075_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 39075_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:25.18 +32:37:11.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#esa_tap#, MAG_MEAN=14.08, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.06)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.060 161314642311196544 071.10429251663 +32.61994854694 12.9710 11.4331 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.060#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89704_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 89704_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:35.76 +29:00:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34197_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 34197_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:41.80 +32:54:57.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#esa_tap#, MAG_MEAN=13.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.739 181638741091160192 076.42399880855 +32.91640637690 12.9920 11.5721 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.739#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 107910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.33 +26:08:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51042_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 51042_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:03.27 +31:38:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87999_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 87999_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:20.41 +29:14:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69503_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 69503_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122907_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 122907_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112802_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 112802_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28843_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 28843_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:24.48 +33:03:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95321_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 95321_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:54.52 +25:01:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33915_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 33915_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:35.83 +32:55:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 70734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:49.74 +30:05:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 41372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:11.24 +32:26:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 113106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:16.43 +27:22:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 54309_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:26.22 +31:29:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11714_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 11714_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:36.99 +34:02:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77691_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 77691_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:22.79 +29:29:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122626_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 122626_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57237_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 57237_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 108616_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:08.19 +27:03:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30241_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 30241_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:24.85 +32:57:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96408_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 96408_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:58.60 +25:08:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12426_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 12426_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:00.12 +33:56:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 113795_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:57.11 +27:27:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127459_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 127459_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:30.21 +28:38:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103810_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 103810_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:43.22 +26:03:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 66229_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:55.92 +30:38:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92956_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 92956_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:42.70 +24:38:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94270_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 94270_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44278_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 44278_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:03.36 +32:09:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 128910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:18.55 +28:34:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113860_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 113860_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:04.94 +27:11:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12393_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 12393_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:11.79 +34:21:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107352_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 107352_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:15.06 +26:43:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39489_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 39489_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:22.72 +32:28:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45877_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 45877_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 08465_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:49.54 +34:37:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88411_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 88411_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32373_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 32373_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:18.52 +33:03:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56491_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 56491_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128048_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 128048_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119522_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 119522_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:22.53 +27:44:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 80620_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:50.47 +29:42:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89537_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 89537_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:01.72 +29:00:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51483_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 51483_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97274_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 97274_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 80722_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:33.58 +29:20:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36697_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 36697_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:39.22 +32:37:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18012_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 18012_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.69 +33:44:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30352_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 30352_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:27.52 +33:10:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38146_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 38146_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29397_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 29397_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:35.13 +32:47:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102076_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 102076_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38835_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 38835_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:39.67 +32:28:56.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#esa_tap#, MAG_MEAN=13.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.886 181012324403023232 079.16551825305 +32.48284878317 12.6768 11.1967 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.886#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04891_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 04891_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:19.28 +34:55:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40884_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 40884_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:51.16 +32:03:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 09926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.16 +34:08:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96324_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 96324_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:23.78 +25:15:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 62858_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:21.56 +30:42:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04255_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
Preparing report for the candidate 04255_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93273_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 93273_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:01.74 +24:45:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 11571_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:19.76 +34:08:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33758_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 33758_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:52.62 +32:28:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58403_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 58403_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:10.52 +31:09:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76756_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 76756_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:43.82 +29:47:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68788_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 68788_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:23.32 +30:32:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66692_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 66692_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:14.46 +30:29:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117946_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 117946_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:38.00 +27:41:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61154_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 61154_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:34.88 +30:47:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41624_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 41624_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:36.84 +32:19:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 61734_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:27.43 +30:48:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75122_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 75122_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:38.11 +29:54:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122846_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 122846_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:44.98 +28:01:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119884_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 119884_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:47.33 +27:53:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53689_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 53689_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:13.09 +31:26:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25109_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 25109_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:59.64 +33:09:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 37731_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:19.20 +32:35:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33443_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 33443_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:23.98 +32:41:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87478_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 87478_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:22.85 +28:56:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78812_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 78812_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:12.42 +29:34:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123790_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 123790_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:59.28 +27:57:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128979_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 128979_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:20.08 +28:36:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28396_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 28396_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:43.13 +32:44:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53531_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 53531_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:38.28 +31:13:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21034_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 21034_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:10.36 +33:22:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94158_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 94158_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:09.44 +25:03:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82518_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 82518_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:40.67 +29:11:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97203_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 97203_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:16.51 +25:08:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54482_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 54482_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:38.33 +31:08:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 88342_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:17.53 +28:36:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04550_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 04550_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:38.75 +34:28:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12946_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 12946_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:00.79 +33:57:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37087_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 37087_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:43.61 +32:11:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67090_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 67090_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:08.13 +30:12:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16231_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055
The candidate 16231_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-04_00-15-33_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:59.97 +33:44:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 3s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 445s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
04:52:01.72 +29:00:04.0
05:19:01.80 +24:45:52.6
05:04:31.43 +26:06:58.7
05:22:16.07 +34:39:56.8
05:05:16.10 +34:31:18.6
04:30:24.32 +28:19:16.4
05:18:23.68 +27:30:34.2
05:33:24.80 +28:12:58.6
05:36:13.52 +32:12:40.0
05:29:57.37 +24:55:57.3
04:56:50.86 +33:51:30.7
05:31:33.36 +24:40:20.1
05:31:57.55 +27:21:35.4
04:28:15.59 +29:56:35.1
05:07:58.49 +31:38:03.1
05:34:28.52 +31:17:35.4
04:36:15.34 +30:28:08.6
05:34:31.56 +32:13:04.4
04:47:18.85 +32:18:19.7
05:32:36.82 +31:27:01.5
04:41:46.78 +31:41:53.3
04:46:06.07 +31:22:53.4
05:11:35.42 +31:14:05.1
05:07:11.48 +29:09:18.6
05:30:17.60 +24:42:57.0
05:17:43.22 +25:25:05.3
05:25:51.48 +25:45:32.5
########### Completed Aur-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
05:04:31.43 +26:06:58.7
04:52:01.72 +29:00:04.0
05:19:01.80 +24:45:52.6
05:29:57.37 +24:55:57.3
04:56:50.86 +33:51:30.7
05:31:33.36 +24:40:20.1
05:31:57.55 +27:21:35.4
04:28:15.59 +29:56:35.1
05:07:58.49 +31:38:03.1
05:34:28.52 +31:17:35.4
04:36:15.34 +30:28:08.6
04:47:18.85 +32:18:19.7
05:17:43.22 +25:25:05.3
05:32:36.82 +31:27:01.5
05:25:51.48 +25:45:32.5
04:30:24.32 +28:19:16.4
05:36:13.52 +32:12:40.0
05:05:16.10 +34:31:18.6
05:18:23.68 +27:30:34.2
05:07:11.48 +29:09:18.6
04:41:46.78 +31:41:53.3
05:11:35.42 +31:14:05.1
05:30:17.60 +24:42:57.0
04:46:06.07 +31:22:53.4
05:33:24.80 +28:12:58.6
05:34:31.56 +32:13:04.4
05:22:16.07 +34:39:56.8
###################################################################################
05:04:31.43 +26:06:58.7 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
04:52:01.72 +29:00:04.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
05:19:01.80 +24:45:52.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
05:29:57.37 +24:55:57.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
04:56:50.86 +33:51:30.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
05:31:33.36 +24:40:20.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
05:31:57.55 +27:21:35.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
04:28:15.59 +29:56:35.1 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
05:07:58.49 +31:38:03.1 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
05:34:28.52 +31:17:35.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
04:36:15.34 +30:28:08.6 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
04:47:18.85 +32:18:19.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
05:17:43.22 +25:25:05.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
05:32:36.82 +31:27:01.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
05:25:51.48 +25:45:32.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
04:30:24.32 +28:19:16.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
05:36:13.52 +32:12:40.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
05:05:16.10 +34:31:18.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
05:18:23.68 +27:30:34.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
05:07:11.48 +29:09:18.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
04:41:46.78 +31:41:53.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
05:11:35.42 +31:14:05.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
05:30:17.60 +24:42:57.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
04:46:06.07 +31:22:53.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
05:33:24.80 +28:12:58.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
05:34:31.56 +32:13:04.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
05:22:16.07 +34:39:56.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
04:30:24.32 +28:19:16.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
04:41:46.78 +31:41:53.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
04:46:06.07 +31:22:53.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
04:47:18.85 +32:18:19.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
04:52:01.72 +29:00:04.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
04:56:50.86 +33:51:30.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
05:05:16.10 +34:31:18.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
05:07:11.48 +29:09:18.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
05:11:35.42 +31:14:05.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
05:17:43.22 +25:25:05.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
05:18:23.68 +27:30:34.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
05:19:01.80 +24:45:52.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
05:22:16.07 +34:39:56.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
05:25:51.48 +25:45:32.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
05:29:57.37 +24:55:57.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
05:30:17.60 +24:42:57.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
05:31:33.36 +24:40:20.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
05:31:57.55 +27:21:35.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
05:32:36.82 +31:27:01.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
05:33:24.80 +28:12:58.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
05:34:28.52 +31:17:35.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
05:34:31.56 +32:13:04.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
05:36:13.52 +32:12:40.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
04:30:24.32 +28:19:16.4 -- a known variable star
04:41:46.78 +31:41:53.3 -- not a known variable star
04:46:06.07 +31:22:53.4 -- a known variable star
04:47:18.85 +32:18:19.7 -- not a known variable star
04:52:01.72 +29:00:04.0 -- a known variable star
04:56:50.86 +33:51:30.7 -- not a known variable star
05:05:16.10 +34:31:18.6 -- a known variable star
05:07:11.48 +29:09:18.6 -- a known variable star
05:11:35.42 +31:14:05.1 -- not a known variable star
05:17:43.22 +25:25:05.3 -- a known variable star
05:18:23.68 +27:30:34.2 -- a known variable star
05:19:01.80 +24:45:52.6 -- a known variable star
05:22:16.07 +34:39:56.8 -- a known variable star
05:25:51.48 +25:45:32.5 -- a known variable star
05:29:57.37 +24:55:57.3 -- not a known variable star
05:30:17.60 +24:42:57.0 -- a known variable star
05:31:33.36 +24:40:20.1 -- not a known variable star
05:31:57.55 +27:21:35.4 -- a known variable star
05:32:36.82 +31:27:01.5 -- a known variable star
05:33:24.80 +28:12:58.6 -- a known variable star
05:34:28.52 +31:17:35.4 -- a known variable star
05:34:31.56 +32:13:04.4 -- not a known variable star
05:36:13.52 +32:12:40.0 -- a known variable star
Found 7 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
23 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
04:30:24.32 +28:19:16.4
04:41:46.78 +31:41:53.3
04:46:06.07 +31:22:53.4
04:47:18.85 +32:18:19.7
04:52:01.72 +29:00:04.0
04:56:50.86 +33:51:30.7
05:05:16.10 +34:31:18.6
05:07:11.48 +29:09:18.6
05:11:35.42 +31:14:05.1
05:17:43.22 +25:25:05.3
05:18:23.68 +27:30:34.2
05:19:01.80 +24:45:52.6
05:22:16.07 +34:39:56.8
05:25:51.48 +25:45:32.5
05:29:57.37 +24:55:57.3
05:30:17.60 +24:42:57.0
05:31:33.36 +24:40:20.1
05:31:57.55 +27:21:35.4
05:32:36.82 +31:27:01.5
05:33:24.80 +28:12:58.6
05:34:28.52 +31:17:35.4
05:34:31.56 +32:13:04.4
05:36:13.52 +32:12:40.0
05:19:37.57 +26:23:15.7
04:58:09.50 +29:02:26.3
05:20:56.77 +33:38:41.1
04:52:06.23 +30:57:02.3
05:05:41.80 +32:54:57.4
05:16:39.67 +32:28:56.5
04:44:25.18 +32:37:11.0
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461348.76026199 -observatory V36
14:38:36.01 -15:58:40.9 Mercury (6.4mag)
13:24:20.44 -13:14:27.9 Venus (-4.4mag)
09:31:18.79 +16:26:11.7 Mars (0.8mag)
09:47:29.44 +14:04:17.0 Jupiter (-2.0mag)
00:36:13.29 +00:59:29.2 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:08:53.52 +20:49:46.1 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:08:16.11 -00:38:40.9 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:30.32 -23:41:24.0 Pluto (14.5mag)
10:53:19.72 +05:20:22.8 Moon (-9.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Nov 4 00:29 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461348.76026199:
09:47:35.89 +14:03:40.2 Io (6.0mag)
09:47:22.42 +14:04:56.3 Europa (6.1mag)
09:47:31.01 +14:04:09.0 Ganymede (5.5mag)
09:48:00.36 +14:01:21.4 Callisto (6.8mag)
09:49:00.17 +14:13:12.1 Himalia (15.5mag)
09:47:32.65 +14:04:00.1 Thebe (16.3mag)
09:47:18.48 +14:29:20.2 Elara (17.4mag)
09:48:10.65 +13:32:16.9 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
09:44:27.64 +14:36:19.9 Carme (18.7mag)
00:36:24.51 +00:59:05.8 Titan (8.3mag)
00:36:07.77 +00:59:33.0 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:36:44.94 +01:00:18.6 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:36:05.26 +00:59:03.6 Hyperion (14.2mag)
00:34:26.54 +00:47:21.7 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Nov 4 00:29 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461348.76026199:
04:38:30.28 +17:07:39.5 JWST
17:14:57.06 +38:20:15.2 Chandra
12:12:41.06 -61:35:11.2 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Nov 4 00:29 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461348.76026199 -observatory V36
03:33:01.07 +19:55:35.2 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
07:46:53.75 +38:26:45.5 17.8mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill)
07:46:59.13 +38:26:32.6 17.8mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill)
07:46:17.51 +38:26:53.0 17.8mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill)
05:01:41.18 +38:57:43.6 17.7mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski)
18:49:02.00 -32:51:04.9 15.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:45:20.82 -73:57:35.2 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:11:15.30 +35:19:54.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
07:35:46.85 +25:20:22.3 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:08:38.26 +38:39:10.4 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:37:34.60 +40:51:53.1 17.5mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:42:46.51 -13:32:12.9 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
14:16:12.43 -04:39:12.1 16.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
20:17:56.50 +52:31:44.8 15.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
13:08:23.04 +17:06:19.5 17.7mag A/2026 E1
15:58:31.93 -65:56:15.9 14.6mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
19:34:54.08 -05:22:51.5 17.1mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS)
23:26:56.67 +13:50:14.8 16.8mag 2P/Encke
23:27:09.95 -25:32:14.1 15.4mag 10P/Tempel
02:40:55.96 +30:07:05.0 16.3mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:26:41.11 -10:06:15.4 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:10:23.42 -09:00:26.9 15.9mag 65P/Gunn
08:00:50.87 +13:30:08.0 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels
09:02:33.86 +46:07:54.6 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
09:52:43.43 +05:16:21.6 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
12:28:31.26 +07:51:29.5 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
19:47:01.79 +14:37:58.4 10.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
11:13:55.29 -03:15:23.6 16.3mag 169P/NEAT
09:41:55.48 +23:27:33.4 18.0mag 186P/Garradd
03:09:53.47 +02:07:44.3 15.3mag 220P/McNaught
06:22:41.32 +49:54:48.6 15.6mag 260P/McNaught
07:57:20.55 +25:03:38.1 17.5mag 266P/Christensen
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.6K Nov 4 00:29 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
02:29:41.13 -71:57:55.60 ASASSN-26fr 2026-11-1.22 13.7
21:27:22.43 -18:15:42.10 SN 2026agsu 2026-10-29.85 -1.08
17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92
10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27
21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82
01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9
01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88
00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77
22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42
01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3
18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23
21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83
03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75
04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52
09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93
02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85
02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61
22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56
15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Nov 4 00:29 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag
00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag
01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag
17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag
09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag
00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag
04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag
05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag
05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Nov 4 00:29 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
11:49:07.467 +20:28:27.00 AT 2026afvq 2026-10-18.54 19.0025
05:21:07.640 +23:38:21.30 AT 2026afvp 2026-10-18.40 10.3
09:31:51.300 -05:51:50.06 AT 2026afvo 2026-10-18.53 19.3989
11:47:33.570 +15:53:59.36 AT 2026afvn 2026-10-18.54 17.9673
04:08:22.865 -01:57:41.49 AT 2026afvm 2026-10-03.57 20.74
02:57:23.229 +23:15:05.14 AT 2026afvl 2026-10-14.38 21.6
03:39:38.127 +00:06:23.78 AT 2026afvk 2026-10-03.54 20.86
06:28:56.066 -21:10:56.44 AT 2026afvj 2026-10-17.61 20.66
22:36:58.814 +12:17:43.08 AT 2026afvi 2026-10-18.22 20.88
22:19:44.739 +14:32:54.10 AT 2026afvh 2026-10-18.22 21.11
03:33:51.668 +02:12:48.26 AT 2026afvg 2026-10-18.34 20.3423
01:50:59.284 -14:35:47.52 AT 2026afvf 2026-10-15.29 19.8509
03:33:40.648 +03:15:42.84 AT 2026afve 2026-10-18.41 20.2098
05:47:54.576 +66:31:16.59 AT 2026afvd 2026-10-15.40 19.7645
01:21:24.040 +10:11:02.74 AT 2026afvc 2026-10-13.74 21.71
00:04:52.660 +28:32:15.80 AT 2026afvb 2026-10-13.53 19.96
23:32:22.880 +13:42:51.02 AT 2026afva 2026-10-17.77 20.92
07:39:44.850 +58:14:11.33 AT 2026afuz 2026-10-08.88 21.51
23:05:43.620 +33:22:00.16 AT 2026afuy 2026-10-08.85 21.74
23:59:42.800 +15:17:57.90 AT 2026afux 2026-10-05.79 21.82
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Nov 4 00:29 tns_transients_list.txt
