This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.4809 2461347.9809 8.68 10:51:18.97 -28:37:40.3
273.32080 27.24845 galactic Hya Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 3.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" RS Hya
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.200 V 14.400 V 2439169.00000 338.600000000000 M6e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:51:18.97 -28:37:40.3: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:51:18.97 -28:37:40.3: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
RS Hya,2461347.9809,8.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
RS Hya 20261103.4809 8.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.4809 2461347.9809 9.81 10:27:18.03 -25:32:57.3
266.40358 26.91485 galactic Hya Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 3.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" CZ Hya
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.880 V 12.800 V 2427546.00000 442.000000000000 Ce
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:27:18.03 -25:32:57.3: 11.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:27:18.03 -25:32:57.3: 11.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.20 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CZ Hya,2461347.9809,9.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CZ Hya 20261103.4809 9.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.4809 2461347.9809 12.21 10:45:45.97 -24:32:57.8
269.70072 30.09248 galactic Hya Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 4.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J104546-2432.9
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.050 V Y 1.810 V 2452612.90000 864.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:45:45.97 -24:32:57.8: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:45:45.97 -24:32:57.8: 13.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J104546-2432.9,2461347.9809,12.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J104546-2432.9 20261103.4809 12.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.4809 2461347.9809 9.09 10:34:03.11 -28:35:55.0
269.71684 25.27056 galactic Hya Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 3.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J103403-2835.9
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.110 V Y 1.270 V 2452555.30000 238.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:34:03.11 -28:35:55.0: 10.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:34:03.11 -28:35:55.0: 10.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.05 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J103403-2835.9,2461347.9809,9.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J103403-2835.9 20261103.4809 9.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461140.69873281 10.04.2026 04:46:00.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
First image: 2461140.69873281 10.04.2026 04:46:00.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Last image: 2461347.98116411 03.11.2026 11:32:42.579 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 32
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.85
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7040
Objects passed selection criteria: 7030
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6393.75
Average stars matched: 6241.25 (97.6149 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233236 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 05:38:37 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461140.69873281 10.04.2026 04:46:00.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
First image: 2461140.69873281 10.04.2026 04:46:00.515 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Last image: 2461347.98116411 03.11.2026 11:32:42.579 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 147
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 49070
Objects passed selection criteria: 48932
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 39781.5
Average stars matched: 38510.2 (96.8044 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 271188 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 05:40:26 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.98065811
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:33:33.655 -26:01:20.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
Image size: 942.8'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:33:45.628 -26:01:48.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:33:33.655 -26:01:20.98
Second-epoch image center 10:33:45.628 -26:01:48.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0455 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
Image size: 942.8'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:33:46.926 -26:02:03.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:33:33.655 -26:01:20.98
Second-epoch image center 10:33:46.926 -26:02:03.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0511 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:33:45.628 -26:01:48.14
Second-epoch second image center 10:33:46.926 -26:02:03.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00653 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uznvZJevei
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JHBJA0z5OA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZuBRVTwdLg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uJFrvKQcTe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits and wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits and wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits and wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits) and catalog (wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7204 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 148.9436 to 167.1698 deg, Dec -31.5131 to -20.1684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 148.9436 to 167.1698 deg, Dec -31.5131 to -20.1684 deg
Loaded 9105 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5610 out of 5792 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5792 out of 7204 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.664000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.664000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.85
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.81
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.81
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7204 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 148.9436 to 167.1698 deg, Dec -31.5131 to -20.1684 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 148.9436 to 167.1698 deg, Dec -31.5131 to -20.1684 deg
Loaded 9105 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5610 out of 5792 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5792 out of 7204 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 7193 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 148.9436 to 167.1895 deg, Dec -31.5130 to -20.0556 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 148.9436 to 167.1895 deg, Dec -31.5130 to -20.0556 deg
Loaded 9197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5601 out of 5798 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5798 out of 7193 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 30 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
2.1 pix Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
3.9 pix fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
3.9 pix fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
14.8 mag. Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.uznvZJevei (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits' -> 'wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=515, bad_region=0, passed=7204
Got 7204 stars (including 6677 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7204 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7204 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7204 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7204 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=1074 n_q2=1238 n_q3=1216 n_q4=1377 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4905 N_valid=4905 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.268 p95_sep_arcsec=0.799 n_q1=1074 n_q2=1238 n_q3=1216 n_q4=1377 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits -region wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JHBJA0z5OA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=535, bad_region=0, passed=7193
Got 7193 stars (including 6650 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7193 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=1081 n_q2=1233 n_q3=1228 n_q4=1368 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.230
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4910 N_valid=4910 bias_ra_arcsec=0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=0.000 median_sep_arcsec=0.263 p95_sep_arcsec=0.836 n_q1=1081 n_q2=1233 n_q3=1228 n_q4=1368 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits -region wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZuBRVTwdLg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=254, bad_region=0, passed=5661
Got 5661 stars (including 5405 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5661 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5661 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=11.731 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.891 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.891 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.611 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.008 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.830 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4898 robust_rms=0.483 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.717 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.660 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4898 robust_rms_before=1.648 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.435 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.483 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.639 worst_region_rms_after=0.717 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.082 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.660
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.639 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.639 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.435 arcsec matched=4898
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.631 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.386 n_q1=1447 n_q2=960 n_q3=1443 n_q4=1048 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.479
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4898 N_valid=4898 bias_ra_arcsec=1.241 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.263 median_sep_arcsec=1.481 p95_sep_arcsec=3.101 n_q1=1447 n_q2=960 n_q3=1443 n_q4=1048 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits -region wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.uJFrvKQcTe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=230, bad_region=0, passed=5695
Got 5695 stars (including 5464 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5695 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5381)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=11.625 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.931 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.931 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.621 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.969 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.834 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.498 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.679 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.668 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4892 robust_rms_before=1.648 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.428 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.498 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.650 worst_region_rms_after=0.679 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.056 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.668
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.650 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.650 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.428 arcsec matched=4892
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.586 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=1446 n_q2=958 n_q3=1435 n_q4=1053 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.406
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4892 N_valid=4892 bias_ra_arcsec=1.257 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.287 median_sep_arcsec=1.487 p95_sep_arcsec=3.096 n_q1=1446 n_q2=958 n_q3=1435 n_q4=1053 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits -region wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits sigma_overall=0.313 worst_q_ratio=1.163
ref2=Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits sigma_overall=0.321 worst_q_ratio=1.230
new1=fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits sigma_overall=0.427 worst_q_ratio=1.479
new2=fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits sigma_overall=0.417 worst_q_ratio=1.406
reference average sigma_overall=0.317 worst_q_ratio=1.1965
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055_astrometric_residuals.png (4905 matched stars from wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056_astrometric_residuals.png (4910 matched stars from wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555_astrometric_residuals.png (4898 matched stars from wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556_astrometric_residuals.png (4892 matched stars from wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Hya-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:28:26.60 -22:34:15.9: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:06:53.02 -22:29:42.4: 11.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:23:01.38 -22:53:10.5: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:51:18.97 -28:37:40.3: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:22:57.61 -24:00:11.0: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:30:00.25 -24:11:23.5: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:02:43.73 -20:50:33.4: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:31:29.96 -25:02:58.3: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:19:14.19 -23:44:08.0: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:29:26.44 -24:41:48.8: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:23:01.38 -22:53:10.5: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:22:57.61 -24:00:11.0: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:28:26.60 -22:34:15.9: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:06:53.02 -22:29:42.4: 11.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:30:00.25 -24:11:23.5: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:02:43.73 -20:50:33.4: 11.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:28:26.60 -22:34:15.9: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4426 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:22:57.61 -24:00:11.0: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5068 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:31:29.96 -25:02:58.3: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:23:01.38 -22:53:10.5: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4855 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:06:53.02 -22:29:42.4: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4879 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:51:18.97 -28:37:40.3: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:02:43.73 -20:50:33.4: ref_mag=11.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4698 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:30:00.25 -24:11:23.5: ref_mag=11.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4392 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:31:29.96 -25:02:58.3: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3683 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:51:18.97 -28:37:40.3: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=8.6814 delta=3.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:19:14.19 -23:44:08.0: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:29:26.44 -24:41:48.8: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:19:14.19 -23:44:08.0: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5004 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:29:26.44 -24:41:48.8: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4992 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:00:40.81 -23:35:54.1: 11.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:03:44.45 -22:21:14.9: 11.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:00:37.48 -23:29:48.3: 11.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:28:29.80 -21:32:40.0: 11.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:20:36.87 -20:49:41.9: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:03:42.78 -23:45:16.1: 11.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:11:35.34 -21:16:55.0: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:23:37.03 -22:22:15.3: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:11:53.44 -24:09:15.7: 11.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:03:44.45 -22:21:14.9: 11.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:00:40.81 -23:35:54.1: 11.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:28:29.80 -21:32:40.0: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:20:36.87 -20:49:41.9: 11.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:03:44.45 -22:21:14.9: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5499 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:00:37.48 -23:29:48.3: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:03:42.78 -23:45:16.1: 11.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:00:40.81 -23:35:54.1: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5485 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:28:29.80 -21:32:40.0: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5373 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:00:37.48 -23:29:48.3: ref_mag=11.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5327 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:36.87 -20:49:41.9: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4904 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:03:42.78 -23:45:16.1: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5376 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:11:35.34 -21:16:55.0: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:23:37.03 -22:22:15.3: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:35.34 -21:16:55.0: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6132 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:23:37.03 -22:22:15.3: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6282 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:11:53.44 -24:09:15.7: 11.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:53.44 -24:09:15.7: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6039 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:11:04.32 -24:53:20.4: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:08:15.95 -20:39:07.6: 12.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:26:49.69 -21:10:52.0: 11.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:03:36.17 -23:36:23.1: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:03:56.22 -22:21:23.8: 12.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:05:28.12 -23:37:56.7: 11.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:06:12.92 -26:56:41.6: 11.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:27:18.03 -25:32:57.3: 11.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:08:15.95 -20:39:07.6: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:11:04.32 -24:53:20.4: 11.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:08:15.95 -20:39:07.6: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5970 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:04.32 -24:53:20.4: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6117 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:26:49.69 -21:10:52.0: 11.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:03:56.22 -22:21:23.8: 12.09 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:03:36.17 -23:36:23.1: 12.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:06:12.92 -26:56:41.6: 11.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:26:49.69 -21:10:52.0: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6081 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:05:28.12 -23:37:56.7: 11.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:03:36.17 -23:36:23.1: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6467 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:03:56.22 -22:21:23.8: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6482 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:06:12.92 -26:56:41.6: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6373 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:05:28.12 -23:37:56.7: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6115 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:27:18.03 -25:32:57.3: 11.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:27:18.03 -25:32:57.3: ref_mag=11.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=9.8116 delta=1.39 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out03010.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20401.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 52s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20401_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
Preparing report for the candidate 20401_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20484_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20484_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:18:29.84 -22:45:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20489_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20489_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20492_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20492_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:07:28.03 -22:31:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20494_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20494_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20497_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20497_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20500_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20500_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20502_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20502_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20503_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20503_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20504_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20504_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20505_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20505_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20507_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20507_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20508_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20508_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20510_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20510_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20511_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20511_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20512_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20512_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20514_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20514_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20517_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20517_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20522_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20522_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:16:25.97 -21:09:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20524_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20524_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20528_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20528_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20529_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20529_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20531_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20531_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20532_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20532_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20534_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20534_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20538_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20538_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20540_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20540_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20545_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20545_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20547_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 20547_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03010_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
Preparing report for the candidate 03010_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 54s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Hya-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:27:18.03 -25:32:57.3
10:51:18.97 -28:37:40.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:33:33.655 -26:01:20.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
Image size: 942.8'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:33:45.628 -26:01:48.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:33:33.655 -26:01:20.98
Second-epoch image center 10:33:45.628 -26:01:48.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0455 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
Image size: 942.8'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:33:46.926 -26:02:03.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:33:33.655 -26:01:20.98
Second-epoch image center 10:33:46.926 -26:02:03.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0511 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:33:45.628 -26:01:48.14
Second-epoch second image center 10:33:46.926 -26:02:03.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00653 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FUM69KcQG6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JLFKKfu4ZV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d2niROmnbz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DafDjUvi1K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits and wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits and wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits and wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits) and catalog (wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 52991 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 148.9436 to 167.1775 deg, Dec -31.5405 to -20.0756 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 148.9436 to 167.1775 deg, Dec -31.5405 to -20.0756 deg
Loaded 9197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6702 out of 7322 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7322 out of 52991 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.522700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.522700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 52991 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 148.9436 to 167.1775 deg, Dec -31.5405 to -20.0756 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 148.9436 to 167.1775 deg, Dec -31.5405 to -20.0756 deg
Loaded 9197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6702 out of 7322 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7322 out of 52991 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 53198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 148.9436 to 167.1895 deg, Dec -31.5295 to -20.0556 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 148.9436 to 167.1895 deg, Dec -31.5295 to -20.0556 deg
Loaded 9211 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6688 out of 7320 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7320 out of 53198 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 134 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
1.9 pix Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
3.6 pix fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
3.6 pix fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
15.0 mag. Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FUM69KcQG6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits' -> 'wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=2215, bad_region=1, passed=52973
Got 52973 stars (including 50661 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52973 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=1062 n_q2=1246 n_q3=1223 n_q4=1379 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.174
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4910 N_valid=4910 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.006 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.264 p95_sep_arcsec=0.778 n_q1=1062 n_q2=1246 n_q3=1223 n_q4=1379 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits -region wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.JLFKKfu4ZV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits' -> 'wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2290, bad_region=1, passed=53188
Got 53188 stars (including 50799 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53188 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53188 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53188 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53188 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=1066 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1233 n_q4=1370 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4912 N_valid=4912 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=0.000 median_sep_arcsec=0.260 p95_sep_arcsec=0.832 n_q1=1066 n_q2=1243 n_q3=1233 n_q4=1370 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits -region wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.d2niROmnbz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1073, bad_region=32, passed=27043
Got 27043 stars (including 25910 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27043 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=11.630 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.167 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.167 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.611 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.997 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.814 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.483 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.707 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.645 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4893 robust_rms_before=1.652 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.432 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.483 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.638 worst_region_rms_after=0.707 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.077 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.645
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.638 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.638 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.432 arcsec matched=4893
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.379 n_q1=1431 n_q2=945 n_q3=1470 n_q4=1047 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.502
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4893 N_valid=4893 bias_ra_arcsec=1.258 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.280 median_sep_arcsec=1.489 p95_sep_arcsec=3.054 n_q1=1431 n_q2=945 n_q3=1470 n_q4=1047 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits -region wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.DafDjUvi1K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1123, bad_region=28, passed=27182
Got 27182 stars (including 26007 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27182 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.4 to -20.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4895 robust_rms=11.639 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.876 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.876 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4895 robust_rms=0.613 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.931 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.832 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4895 robust_rms=0.493 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.678 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.665 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4895 robust_rms_before=1.656 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.427 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.493 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.642 worst_region_rms_after=0.678 outer_annulus_rms_before=2.048 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.665
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.642 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.642 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.427 arcsec matched=4895
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.597 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.379 n_q1=1433 n_q2=947 n_q3=1469 n_q4=1046 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.438
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4895 N_valid=4895 bias_ra_arcsec=1.258 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.308 median_sep_arcsec=1.491 p95_sep_arcsec=3.073 n_q1=1433 n_q2=947 n_q3=1469 n_q4=1046 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits -region wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-31-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0555.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_053331_TTUQ1b1x1_1516541_yajMeTLu/wcs_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Hya-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:30:13.93 -28:34:09.8: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:41:15.21 -27:54:55.5: 12.90 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:28:37.38 -23:04:55.6: 13.47 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:41:15.21 -27:54:55.5: 12.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:28:37.38 -23:04:55.6: 13.67 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:15.21 -27:54:55.5: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6800 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:28:37.38 -23:04:55.6: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3405 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:30:13.93 -28:34:09.8: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:30:13.93 -28:34:09.8: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7041 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:00:46.61 -28:13:49.3: 14.29 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:00:46.61 -28:13:49.3: 14.17 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:00:46.61 -28:13:49.3: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5136 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:45:45.97 -24:32:57.8: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-46-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0055.fits at 10:34:03.11 -28:35:55.0: 10.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:45:45.97 -24:32:57.8: 13.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_23-47-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0056.fits at 10:34:03.11 -28:35:55.0: 10.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:45:45.97 -24:32:57.8: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.2057 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.05 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:34:03.11 -28:35:55.0: ref_mag=10.05 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.0910 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out17439.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out47991.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67354_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67354_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67357_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67357_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67360_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67360_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67363_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67363_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67402_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67402_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67403_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67403_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67404_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67404_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67412_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67412_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67454_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67454_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67470_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67470_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67473_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67473_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67483_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67483_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67517_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67517_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:05:11.77 -27:17:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67531_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67531_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67533_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67533_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67546_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67546_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67547_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67547_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67551_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67551_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67552_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67552_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67553_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67553_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67556_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67556_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67559_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67559_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67568_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67568_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67582_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67582_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67588_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67588_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67592_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67592_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67594_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67594_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67600_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67600_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67602_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67602_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67603_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67603_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67607_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67607_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67609_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67609_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67612_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67612_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67620_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67620_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67624_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67624_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67631_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67631_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67635_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67635_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67641_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67641_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67652_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67652_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67654_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67654_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67661_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67661_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:03:24.04 -23:05:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67664_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67664_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67667_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67667_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67669_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67669_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67673_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67673_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67677_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67677_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67687_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67687_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67689_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67689_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67690_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67690_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67691_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67691_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67694_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67694_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:11:56.14 -21:16:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67696_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67696_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67714_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67714_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:23:33.20 -23:27:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67715_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67715_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67720_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67720_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67726_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67726_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67730_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67730_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67731_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67731_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67737_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67737_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67741_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67741_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67742_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67742_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67743_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67743_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67745_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67745_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67747_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67747_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67748_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67748_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67750_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67750_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67751_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67751_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67760_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67760_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67766_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67766_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67768_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67768_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67777_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67777_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67780_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67780_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67781_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67781_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67782_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67782_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67792_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67792_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67805_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67805_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67822_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67822_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67828_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67828_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67835_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67835_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67838_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67838_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67843_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67843_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67845_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67845_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67851_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67851_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67852_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67852_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67855_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67855_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67857_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67857_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67859_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67859_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67860_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67860_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67862_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67862_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67868_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67868_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67871_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67871_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67873_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67873_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67874_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67874_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67878_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67878_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67886_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67886_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67896_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67896_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67897_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67897_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67898_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67898_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67902_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67902_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67907_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67907_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67909_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67909_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67910_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67910_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67911_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67911_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67914_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67914_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67916_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67916_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67919_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67919_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67920_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67920_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67921_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67921_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67923_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67923_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67924_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67924_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67926_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67926_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67927_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67927_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67929_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67929_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67930_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67930_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67933_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67933_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67934_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67934_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67938_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67938_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67941_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67941_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67944_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67944_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67947_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67947_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67948_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67948_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67950_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67950_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67953_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67953_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67959_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67959_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67962_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67962_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67963_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 67963_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65369_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 65369_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48871_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 48871_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:51:18.96 -28:37:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24001_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 24001_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:27:18.03 -25:32:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47839_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 47839_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17439_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
Preparing report for the candidate 17439_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47991_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
Preparing report for the candidate 47991_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10193_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 10193_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:51:28.29 -23:13:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11055_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556
The candidate 11055_fd_Hya-10-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_05-32-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0556 did not pass the final checks