This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.4229* 09 29 39.59 +16 32 57.0 6.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.9229,6.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.4229 6.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.4229* 09 47 06.96 +14 06 01.7 7.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.9229,7.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.4229 7.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.4229* 09 47 19.47 +14 04 45.8 7.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.9229,7.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.4229 7.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.4229* 09 47 36.35 +14 03 10.8 7.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.9229,7.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.4229 7.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.4229 2461347.9229 10.78 09:54:51.54 +09:05:01.9
227.80065 44.63768 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.6 Hebe 0 0 0 10.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:54:51.54 +09:05:01.9: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:54:51.54 +09:05:01.9: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.4229* 09 54 51.54 +09 05 01.9 10.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.9229,10.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.4229 10.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.4229* 09 29 39.59 +16 32 57.3 7.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.9229,7.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.4229 7.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.4229* 09 47 19.50 +14 04 46.0 7.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.9229,7.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.4229 7.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.4229* 09 47 36.37 +14 03 11.0 7.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.9229,7.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.4229 7.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.4229 2461347.9229 13.38 10:12:20.50 +16:02:51.2
221.33065 51.57445 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.245 Vera -2 1 2 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:12:20.50 +16:02:51.2: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:12:20.50 +16:02:51.2: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.4229* 10 12 20.50 +16 02 51.2 13.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.9229,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.4229 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.4229 2461347.9229 13.44 10:10:07.65 +10:15:01.6
229.02266 48.48671 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.1" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:10:07.65 +10:15:01.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:10:07.65 +10:15:01.6: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:10:07.65 +10:15:01.6: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.4229* 10 10 07.65 +10 15 01.6 13.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461347.9229,13.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20261103.4229 13.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.4229* 09 47 06.89 +14 06 01.5 8.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.9229,8.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.4229 8.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.68287475 20.03.2026 04:23:10.378 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461119.68287475 20.03.2026 04:23:10.378 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461347.92317779 03.11.2026 10:09:12.561 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6984
Objects passed selection criteria: 6976
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6011
Average stars matched: 5909.25 (98.3073 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233572 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 04:18:53 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.68287475 20.03.2026 04:23:10.378 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461119.68287475 20.03.2026 04:23:10.378 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461347.92317779 03.11.2026 10:09:12.561 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 188
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.11
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 37973
Objects passed selection criteria: 37878
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 30621.2
Average stars matched: 29280 (95.6199 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 261664 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 04:21:11 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.92267642
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:31.656 +14:00:33.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:41.037 +13:57:59.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:31.656 +14:00:33.25
Second-epoch image center 09:46:41.037 +13:57:59.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0570 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:41.892 +13:57:39.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:31.656 +14:00:33.25
Second-epoch image center 09:46:41.892 +13:57:39.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0636 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:46:41.037 +13:57:59.91
Second-epoch second image center 09:46:41.892 +13:57:39.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00670 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bUHVCiDbqH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Yne9M1pHb6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8mGl4GHEMB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0UiJ6chfhH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7795 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4767 to 154.9673 deg, Dec +8.5555 to +19.3045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4767 to 154.9673 deg, Dec 8.5555 to 19.3045 deg
Loaded 4795 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3891 out of 4080 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4080 out of 7795 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.915200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.915200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7795 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4767 to 154.9673 deg, Dec +8.5555 to +19.3045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4767 to 154.9673 deg, Dec 8.5555 to 19.3045 deg
Loaded 4795 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3891 out of 4080 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4080 out of 7795 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 7228 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4289 to 155.2668 deg, Dec +8.1760 to +19.5844 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4289 to 155.2668 deg, Dec 8.1760 to 19.5844 deg
Loaded 5216 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3897 out of 4082 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4082 out of 7228 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.1 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
3.4 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
3.4 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.5 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.bUHVCiDbqH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=485, bad_region=0, passed=7795
Got 7795 stars (including 7304 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7795 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4624 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4604 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4604 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4624 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4604 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4604 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4604 stars left (next iteration limit 5064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=4604 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1374 n_q2=1044 n_q3=1180 n_q4=1006 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4604 N_valid=4604 bias_ra_arcsec=0.007 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.317 p95_sep_arcsec=1.240 n_q1=1374 n_q2=1044 n_q3=1180 n_q4=1006 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Yne9M1pHb6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=490, bad_region=0, passed=7228
Got 7228 stars (including 6724 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7228 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4626 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4607 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4607 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4626 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4607 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4607 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4607 stars left (next iteration limit 5067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits N_match=4607 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1021 n_q2=1212 n_q3=1021 n_q4=1353 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.071
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4607 N_valid=4607 bias_ra_arcsec=0.007 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.249 p95_sep_arcsec=0.879 n_q1=1021 n_q2=1212 n_q3=1021 n_q4=1353 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8mGl4GHEMB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=310, bad_region=0, passed=4626
Got 4626 stars (including 4314 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4626 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4001 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3984 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3984 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3984 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3999 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 3982 stars left (next iteration limit 4382)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3982 robust_rms=11.924 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.448 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.448 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3982 robust_rms=0.432 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.764 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.764 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3982 robust_rms=0.321 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.453 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.420 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3982 robust_rms_before=1.108 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.345 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.321 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.501 worst_region_rms_after=0.453 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.514 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.420
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.501 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.501 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.345 arcsec matched=3982
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits N_match=3982 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.331 n_q1=1225 n_q2=739 n_q3=1140 n_q4=878 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3982 N_valid=3982 bias_ra_arcsec=0.718 bias_dec_arcsec=0.511 median_sep_arcsec=1.013 p95_sep_arcsec=2.204 n_q1=1225 n_q2=739 n_q3=1140 n_q4=878 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.0UiJ6chfhH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=318, bad_region=0, passed=4617
Got 4617 stars (including 4298 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4617 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4610 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4610 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4610 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 3957 stars left (next iteration limit 4354)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3957 robust_rms=11.905 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.023 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.023 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3957 robust_rms=0.440 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.723 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.723 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3957 robust_rms=0.321 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.468 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.418 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3957 robust_rms_before=1.138 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.336 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.321 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.478 worst_region_rms_after=0.468 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.408 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.418
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.478 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.478 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.336 arcsec matched=3957
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits N_match=3957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=1218 n_q2=728 n_q3=1141 n_q4=870 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.328
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=3957 N_valid=3957 bias_ra_arcsec=0.729 bias_dec_arcsec=0.537 median_sep_arcsec=1.032 p95_sep_arcsec=2.134 n_q1=1218 n_q2=728 n_q3=1141 n_q4=870 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.389 worst_q_ratio=1.128
ref2=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits sigma_overall=0.309 worst_q_ratio=1.071
new1=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits sigma_overall=0.315 worst_q_ratio=1.319
new2=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits sigma_overall=0.317 worst_q_ratio=1.328
reference average sigma_overall=0.349 worst_q_ratio=1.0995
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (4604 matched stars from wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138_astrometric_residuals.png (4607 matched stars from wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481_astrometric_residuals.png (3982 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482_astrometric_residuals.png (3957 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 09:54:51.54 +09:05:01.9: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 09:54:51.54 +09:05:01.9: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20376.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 84s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20363_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
Preparing report for the candidate 20363_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20364_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
Preparing report for the candidate 20364_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20365_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
Preparing report for the candidate 20365_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20366_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
Preparing report for the candidate 20366_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20368_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 20368_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:35:55.52 +14:22:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20371_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 20371_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20372_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 20372_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20374_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 20374_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20375_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 20375_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20376_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
Preparing report for the candidate 20376_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20378_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 20378_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20379_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 20379_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20380_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 20380_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20381_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 20381_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20386_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 20386_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 88s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
09:54:51.54 +09:05:01.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:31.656 +14:00:33.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:41.037 +13:57:59.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:31.656 +14:00:33.25
Second-epoch image center 09:46:41.037 +13:57:59.91
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0570 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:41.892 +13:57:39.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:31.656 +14:00:33.25
Second-epoch image center 09:46:41.892 +13:57:39.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0636 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:46:41.037 +13:57:59.91
Second-epoch second image center 09:46:41.892 +13:57:39.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00670 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bLdV1Znyg4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NLxtJLUrJ8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NS8bDnumu8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kLmOY3sTOW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 41224 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4693 to 154.9673 deg, Dec +8.5466 to +19.3048 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4693 to 154.9673 deg, Dec 8.5466 to 19.3048 deg
Loaded 4807 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3691 out of 4110 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4110 out of 41224 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.790900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.790900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.11
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 41224 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.4693 to 154.9673 deg, Dec +8.5466 to +19.3048 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.4693 to 154.9673 deg, Dec 8.5466 to 19.3048 deg
Loaded 4807 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3691 out of 4110 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4110 out of 41224 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 42226 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.3847 to 155.2957 deg, Dec +8.1204 to +19.5912 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.3847 to 155.2957 deg, Dec 8.1204 to 19.5912 deg
Loaded 5273 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3733 out of 4126 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4126 out of 42226 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 168 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.0 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
3.2 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
3.2 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.7 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
26.4 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
16.5 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 16.5 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.bLdV1Znyg4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1984, bad_region=0, passed=41202
Got 41202 stars (including 39163 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41202 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4609 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4593 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4593 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4609 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4593 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4593 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4593 stars left (next iteration limit 5052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=4593 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.373 n_q1=1357 n_q2=1062 n_q3=1139 n_q4=1035 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4593 N_valid=4593 bias_ra_arcsec=0.020 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.016 median_sep_arcsec=0.313 p95_sep_arcsec=1.217 n_q1=1357 n_q2=1062 n_q3=1139 n_q4=1035 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NLxtJLUrJ8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1796, bad_region=34, passed=42210
Got 42210 stars (including 40321 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42210 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4617 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4604 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4604 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42210 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4617 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4604 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42210 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4604 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42210 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4604 stars left (next iteration limit 5064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits N_match=4604 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.270 n_q1=1022 n_q2=1221 n_q3=1021 n_q4=1340 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.057
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4604 N_valid=4604 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=0.006 median_sep_arcsec=0.245 p95_sep_arcsec=0.849 n_q1=1022 n_q2=1221 n_q3=1021 n_q4=1340 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.NS8bDnumu8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=4, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=832, bad_region=32, passed=20029
Got 20029 stars (including 19144 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20029 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4644 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4625 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4625 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4625 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20029 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4644 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4625 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20029 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4625 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20029 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4625 stars left (next iteration limit 5087)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4625 robust_rms=11.370 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.415 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.415 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4625 robust_rms=0.444 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.767 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.767 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4625 robust_rms=0.336 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.476 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.425 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4625 robust_rms_before=1.112 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.340 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.336 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.489 worst_region_rms_after=0.476 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.500 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.425
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.489 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.489 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.340 arcsec matched=4625
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits N_match=4625 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.342 n_q1=1380 n_q2=841 n_q3=1377 n_q4=1027 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4625 N_valid=4625 bias_ra_arcsec=0.717 bias_dec_arcsec=0.501 median_sep_arcsec=1.009 p95_sep_arcsec=2.189 n_q1=1380 n_q2=841 n_q3=1377 n_q4=1027 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.kLmOY3sTOW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=2, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=826, bad_region=34, passed=20014
Got 20014 stars (including 19130 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20014 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4641 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4624 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4624 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20012 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4640 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4622 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20012 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4622 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20012 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4622 stars left (next iteration limit 5086)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4622 robust_rms=11.214 arcsec worst_region_rms=27.741 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=27.741 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4622 robust_rms=0.452 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.735 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.735 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4622 robust_rms=0.334 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.481 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.419 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4622 robust_rms_before=1.150 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.341 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.334 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.479 worst_region_rms_after=0.481 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.413 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.419
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.479 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.479 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.341 arcsec matched=4622
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits N_match=4622 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=1381 n_q2=841 n_q3=1370 n_q4=1030 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.427
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4622 N_valid=4622 bias_ra_arcsec=0.730 bias_dec_arcsec=0.533 median_sep_arcsec=1.035 p95_sep_arcsec=2.146 n_q1=1381 n_q2=841 n_q3=1370 n_q4=1030 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-08-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0481.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_041333_TTUQ1b1x1_2991083_Pexdf6D3/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:01:25.42 +15:40:22.1: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:01:25.42 +15:40:22.1: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:01:25.42 +15:40:22.1: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1736 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:12:20.50 +16:02:51.2: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-23-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 10:10:07.65 +10:15:01.6: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:12:20.50 +16:02:51.2: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_00-03-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0138.fits at 10:10:07.65 +10:15:01.6: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54921.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54928.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 477s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54787_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54787_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54792_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
Preparing report for the candidate 54792_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54793_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
Preparing report for the candidate 54793_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54794_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
Preparing report for the candidate 54794_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54797_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54797_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54798_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54798_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54799_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54799_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:54:51.55 +09:05:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54800_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54800_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54801_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54801_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54805_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54805_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54807_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54807_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54809_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54809_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54810_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54810_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54812_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54812_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:40:58.99 +09:52:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54815_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54815_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54816_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54816_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54817_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54817_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:08:08.75 +11:58:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54820_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54820_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54821_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54821_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54822_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54822_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54825_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54825_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54826_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54826_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54828_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54828_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54829_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54829_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54830_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54830_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54831_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54831_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54832_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54832_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54833_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54833_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54834_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54834_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54835_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54835_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54838_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54838_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54839_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54839_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54840_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54840_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54842_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54842_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54843_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54843_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54844_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54844_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54845_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54845_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54846_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54846_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54847_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54847_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54848_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54848_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54850_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54850_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54851_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54851_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54853_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54853_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54854_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54854_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54856_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54856_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54857_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54857_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54858_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54858_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54860_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54860_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54861_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54861_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54862_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54862_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54863_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54863_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:17:23.89 +13:03:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54864_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54864_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54865_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54865_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54866_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54866_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54868_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54868_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54870_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54870_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54871_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54871_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54872_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54872_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54874_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54874_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54876_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54876_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54877_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54877_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54879_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54879_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54882_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54882_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54884_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54884_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54886_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54886_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54887_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54887_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54889_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54889_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54891_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54891_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54892_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54892_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54895_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54895_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54896_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54896_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54897_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54897_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54898_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54898_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54899_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54899_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54900_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54900_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54902_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54902_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54903_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54903_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54904_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54904_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54905_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54905_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54906_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54906_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54907_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54907_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54910_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54910_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54911_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54911_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54916_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54916_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54919_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54919_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54920_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54920_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54921_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
Preparing report for the candidate 54921_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54923_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54923_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54924_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54924_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54925_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54925_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54927_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54927_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54928_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
Preparing report for the candidate 54928_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54929_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54929_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54930_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54930_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54932_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54932_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54934_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54934_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54937_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54937_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54940_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54940_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54944_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54944_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54945_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54945_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54946_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54946_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54949_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54949_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54950_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54950_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54951_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54951_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54952_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54952_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54953_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54953_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54954_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54954_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54958_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54958_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54959_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54959_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54960_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54960_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54962_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54962_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54963_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54963_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54964_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54964_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54965_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54965_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54966_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54966_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54967_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54967_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54968_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54968_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54969_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54969_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54971_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54971_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54972_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54972_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54973_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54973_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54974_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54974_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54975_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54975_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54976_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54976_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54978_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54978_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54979_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54979_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54980_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54980_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54981_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54981_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54982_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54982_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54983_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54983_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54984_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54984_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54985_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54985_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54986_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54986_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54987_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54987_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54988_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54988_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54990_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54990_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54991_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54991_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54992_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54992_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54993_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54993_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54996_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54996_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54997_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54997_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54998_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 54998_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55000_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55000_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55004_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55004_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55007_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55007_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55009_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55009_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55011_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55011_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55012_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55012_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55019_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55019_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55021_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55021_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55022_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55022_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55023_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55023_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55024_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55024_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55025_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55025_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55027_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55027_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55043_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55043_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55044_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55044_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55048_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55048_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55050_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55050_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55051_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55051_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55052_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55052_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55053_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55053_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55054_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55054_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55061_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55061_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55063_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 55063_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22215_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
Preparing report for the candidate 22215_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11029_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 11029_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25139_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482
The candidate 25139_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_04-09-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0482 did not pass the final checks
