This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3996 2461347.8996 11.40 07:21:46.43 +28:38:49.8
189.67547 18.76496 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope 1 -0 2 11.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:21:46.43 +28:38:49.8: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:21:46.43 +28:38:49.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8996,11.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3996 11.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3996 2461347.8996 12.84 07:18:07.64 +30:44:11.4
187.31562 18.77980 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.702 Alauda 2 -0 2 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:18:07.64 +30:44:11.4: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:18:07.64 +30:44:11.4: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8996,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3996 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3996 2461347.8996 13.20 07:22:36.49 +34:08:59.0
184.25681 20.84455 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.172 Baucis 1 -1 1 13.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:22:36.49 +34:08:59.0: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:22:36.49 +34:08:59.0: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8996,13.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3996 13.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3996 2461347.8996 13.52 06:30:28.75 +33:49:31.1
180.28491 10.73752 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.984 Gretia 1 -0 1 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:30:28.75 +33:49:31.1: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:30:28.75 +33:49:31.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8996,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3996 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
PNV J06501960+3002449,2461347.8996,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
PNV J06501960+3002449 20261103.3996 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461347.89993669 03.11.2026 09:35:44.530 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 60
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 26397
Objects passed selection criteria: 26377
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 24642.5
Average stars matched: 23475 (95.2623 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249824 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 03:42:57 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461347.89993669 03.11.2026 09:35:44.530 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 146
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.04
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 86 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 159428
Objects passed selection criteria: 159089
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 145854
Average stars matched: 140594 (96.3932 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 617444 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 03:46:05 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.89917081
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:11.695 +29:58:18.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 07:00:11.695 +29:58:18.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0472 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:09.285 +29:57:41.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 07:00:09.285 +29:57:41.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0468 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:11.695 +29:58:18.97
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:09.285 +29:57:41.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01357 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jJL6XK7AaV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wZOizOKt2Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W4ZhmrwwDx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FoZW3IxuNy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec +24.1612 to +35.3654 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec 24.1612 to 35.3654 deg
Loaded 15250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10848 out of 11976 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11976 out of 24243 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.910000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.910000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec +24.1612 to +35.3654 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2299 to 114.2898 deg, Dec 24.1612 to 35.3654 deg
Loaded 15250 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10848 out of 11976 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11976 out of 24243 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2298 to 114.2895 deg, Dec +24.1920 to +35.3691 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2298 to 114.2895 deg, Dec 24.1920 to 35.3691 deg
Loaded 15195 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10824 out of 11955 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11955 out of 24037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 59 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
3.2 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
3.2 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.6 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.jJL6XK7AaV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2293, bad_region=0, passed=24243
Got 24243 stars (including 21925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4779 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4779 stars left (next iteration limit 5256)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4779 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=1413 n_q2=1099 n_q3=1188 n_q4=1079 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4779 N_valid=4779 bias_ra_arcsec=0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.267 p95_sep_arcsec=1.287 n_q1=1413 n_q2=1099 n_q3=1188 n_q4=1079 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wZOizOKt2Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2282, bad_region=0, passed=24037
Got 24037 stars (including 21723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4780 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4780 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=4780 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1410 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1181 n_q4=1087 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4780 N_valid=4780 bias_ra_arcsec=0.000 bias_dec_arcsec=0.006 median_sep_arcsec=0.265 p95_sep_arcsec=1.274 n_q1=1410 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1181 n_q4=1087 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.W4ZhmrwwDx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1613, bad_region=3, passed=25400
Got 25400 stars (including 23754 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25400 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4776 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4773 stars left (next iteration limit 5249)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=12.812 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.641 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.641 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.401 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.864 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.864 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.290 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.510 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.510 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4773 robust_rms_before=0.897 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.354 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.290 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.645 worst_region_rms_after=0.510 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.034 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.510
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.sip_refit.D8ToKl/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.sip_refit.D8ToKl/candidate.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:11.684 +29:58:18.13 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 25400 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.sip_refit.D8ToKl/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_984679.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.sip_refit.D8ToKl/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.DSNh3i' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_984679.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.897 -> 0.290 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4773 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4585 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4585 pairs (4773 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4585 robust_rms=12.534 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.633 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.633 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4585 robust_rms=0.397 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.837 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.837 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4585 robust_rms=0.287 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.493 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.493 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4585 robust_rms_before=0.285 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.285 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.287 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.493 worst_region_rms_after=0.493 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.493 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.493
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.sip_refit.91Bjde/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.sip_refit.91Bjde/candidate.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:11.685 +29:58:18.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 25400 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.sip_refit.91Bjde/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_987725.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.sip_refit.91Bjde/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.h6ugKg' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_987725.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.285 -> 0.287 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4585 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4585 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits N_match=4585 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=1422 n_q2=993 n_q3=1181 n_q4=989 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.124
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4585 N_valid=4585 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.241 p95_sep_arcsec=0.980 n_q1=1422 n_q2=993 n_q3=1181 n_q4=989 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FoZW3IxuNy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1607, bad_region=2, passed=25513
Got 25513 stars (including 23883 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25513 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4777 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4777 stars left (next iteration limit 5254)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=12.776 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.354 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.354 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=0.411 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.918 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.918 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4777 robust_rms=0.292 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.522 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.522 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4777 robust_rms_before=0.862 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.356 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.292 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.677 worst_region_rms_after=0.522 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.041 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.522
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.sip_refit.vWINdG/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.sip_refit.vWINdG/candidate.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:09.265 +29:57:40.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 25513 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.sip_refit.vWINdG/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_984692.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.sip_refit.vWINdG/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.I9jAUQ' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_984692.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.862 -> 0.292 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4777 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4589 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4589 pairs (4777 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4589 robust_rms=12.418 arcsec worst_region_rms=29.628 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=29.628 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4589 robust_rms=0.406 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.898 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.898 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4589 robust_rms=0.290 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.517 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.517 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4589 robust_rms_before=0.290 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.290 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.290 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.508 worst_region_rms_after=0.517 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.508 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.517
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs is worse than the solution it would replace (worst-region 0.517 vs 0.508 arcsec) - keeping the current solution
SIP_REFIT: the refit on the re-matched pairs was not applied - keeping the current solution
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4589 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4589 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits N_match=4589 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.239 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=1423 n_q2=1000 n_q3=1174 n_q4=992 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4589 N_valid=4589 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.239 p95_sep_arcsec=1.015 n_q1=1423 n_q2=1000 n_q3=1174 n_q4=992 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.284
ref2=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.250
new1=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits sigma_overall=0.309 worst_q_ratio=1.124
new2=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits sigma_overall=0.295 worst_q_ratio=1.152
reference average sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.267
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226_astrometric_residuals.png (4779 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227_astrometric_residuals.png (4780 matched stars from wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445_astrometric_residuals.png (4585 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446_astrometric_residuals.png (4589 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.21 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:38:24.15 +31:46:32.0: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:01:59.25 +30:29:40.1: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:55:22.75 +28:59:47.0: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:33:50.76 +26:56:45.5: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:21:46.43 +28:38:49.8: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:32:34.63 +27:57:02.5: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:42:07.25 +31:25:12.8: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:02:12.48 +30:13:18.6: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:57:18.55 +31:16:28.5: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:01:59.25 +30:29:40.1: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:21:46.43 +28:38:49.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:33:50.76 +26:56:45.5: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:55:22.75 +28:59:47.0: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:38:24.15 +31:46:32.0: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:59.25 +30:29:40.1: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1628 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:22.75 +28:59:47.0: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1749 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:38:24.15 +31:46:32.0: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1064 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:33:50.76 +26:56:45.5: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2108 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:32:34.63 +27:57:02.5: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:32:34.63 +27:57:02.5: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2824 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:42:07.25 +31:25:12.8: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:02:12.48 +30:13:18.6: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:57:18.55 +31:16:28.5: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:07.25 +31:25:12.8: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3099 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:12.48 +30:13:18.6: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2335 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:18.55 +31:16:28.5: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2600 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:48:59.78 +32:19:16.7: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:58:45.45 +29:22:54.4: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:48:59.78 +32:19:16.7: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:48:59.78 +32:19:16.7: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3048 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:00:11.82 +29:14:56.5: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:46:30.14 +28:50:28.5: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:35:28.27 +28:30:56.7: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:28:25.71 +30:19:10.6: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:54:18.22 +29:00:29.5: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:58:45.45 +29:22:54.4: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:45.45 +29:22:54.4: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2544 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:56:30.21 +29:47:32.3: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:00:11.82 +29:14:56.5: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:00:11.82 +29:14:56.5: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3062 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:35:28.27 +28:30:56.7: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:35:28.27 +28:30:56.7: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3833 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:46:30.14 +28:50:28.5: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:46:30.14 +28:50:28.5: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3466 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:54:18.22 +29:00:29.5: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:28:25.71 +30:19:10.6: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:18.22 +29:00:29.5: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3351 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:25.71 +30:19:10.6: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4036 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:56:03.61 +29:35:59.6: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:56:30.21 +29:47:32.3: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:30.21 +29:47:32.3: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3539 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:29:11.34 +26:45:06.4: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:56:48.35 +32:44:57.7: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:56:03.61 +29:35:59.6: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:03.61 +29:35:59.6: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3615 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:48:06.94 +28:21:45.3: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:56:15.18 +29:12:34.3: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:46:09.19 +29:36:28.2: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:29:11.34 +26:45:06.4: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:51:16.65 +29:55:28.5: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:11.34 +26:45:06.4: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4167 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:56:48.35 +32:44:57.7: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:48.35 +32:44:57.7: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3564 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:04:49.05 +28:48:14.6: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:48:06.94 +28:21:45.3: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:55:19.04 +29:01:44.4: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:56:15.18 +29:12:34.3: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:48:06.94 +28:21:45.3: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3829 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:46:09.19 +29:36:28.2: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:15.18 +29:12:34.3: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3444 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:51:16.65 +29:55:28.5: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:46:09.19 +29:36:28.2: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3813 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:16.65 +29:55:28.5: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4048 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:07:53.68 +29:11:17.1: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:55:01.77 +30:10:23.5: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:04:49.05 +28:48:14.6: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:04:49.05 +28:48:14.6: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3445 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:55:19.04 +29:01:44.4: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:19.04 +29:01:44.4: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4142 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:52:51.55 +28:43:57.0: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:07:53.68 +29:11:17.1: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:53.68 +29:11:17.1: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3449 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:12:06.26 +26:44:40.3: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:52:28.61 +28:26:24.7: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:54:33.52 +30:38:28.8: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:00:57.08 +27:37:51.3: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:55:01.77 +30:10:23.5: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:01.77 +30:10:23.5: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4188 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:52:51.55 +28:43:57.0: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:51.55 +28:43:57.0: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3979 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:52:28.61 +28:26:24.7: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:00:57.08 +27:37:51.3: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:28.61 +28:26:24.7: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4024 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:00:57.08 +27:37:51.3: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3884 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:54:33.52 +30:38:28.8: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:12:06.26 +26:44:40.3: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:57:21.43 +28:47:05.3: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:33.52 +30:38:28.8: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4362 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:58:08.12 +29:58:09.9: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:06.26 +26:44:40.3: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4351 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:58:37.86 +29:06:33.5: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:58:08.12 +29:58:09.9: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:08.12 +29:58:09.9: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4255 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:57:21.43 +28:47:05.3: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:21.43 +28:47:05.3: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4143 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:58:37.86 +29:06:33.5: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:58:37.86 +29:06:33.5: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4226 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31728.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 54s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31406_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 31406_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31448_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 31448_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:04.59 +25:21:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31728_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
Preparing report for the candidate 31728_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31869_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 31869_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31897_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 31897_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:18.84 +29:41:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31946_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 31946_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31953_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 31953_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:00.29 +34:12:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31962_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 31962_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31964_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 31964_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:04.49 +30:01:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31968_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 31968_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31999_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 31999_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32000_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32000_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32001_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32001_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:58.15 +26:55:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32004_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32004_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32006_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32006_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32010_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32010_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:29.37 +27:12:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32011_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32011_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32023_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32023_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32024_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32024_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:53.60 +33:23:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32043_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32043_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:34.16 +28:18:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32046_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32046_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.60 +31:35:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32052_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32052_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32053_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32053_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:34.00 +27:42:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32057_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32057_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32060_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32060_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32062_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32062_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:54.16 +29:11:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32068_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32068_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32072_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32072_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:06.20 +32:35:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32078_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32078_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32079_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32079_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:01.53 +31:08:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32081_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32081_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32082_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32082_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32083_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32083_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32087_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32087_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32089_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32089_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32096_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32096_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32105_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32105_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32108_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32108_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:49.76 +25:04:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32113_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32113_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32116_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32116_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32121_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32121_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32125_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32125_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32127_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32127_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32128_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32128_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32136_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32136_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32144_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32144_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32145_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32145_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32148_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32148_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32158_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32158_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32159_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32159_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32170_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32170_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:32.64 +26:47:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32246_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32246_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:32.92 +26:28:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32297_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 32297_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:14.32 +33:29:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.09 +30:16:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12283_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 12283_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:14.06 +29:07:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21515_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 21515_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:45.16 +34:06:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.25 +33:22:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 03075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:33.97 +25:59:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 55s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:21:46.43 +28:38:49.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:11.685 +29:58:18.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 07:00:11.685 +29:58:18.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0473 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:09.265 +29:57:40.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.338 +29:59:43.36
Second-epoch image center 07:00:09.265 +29:57:40.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0469 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:11.685 +29:58:18.14
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:09.265 +29:57:40.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01357 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JwYGipeMqF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T7E7jIkQ6X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MMySzLPqku
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lbboI4PKlg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec +24.1432 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec 24.1432 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8758 out of 12241 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12241 out of 167542 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.776200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.776200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.04
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.74
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.74
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec +24.1432 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1852 to 114.3067 deg, Dec 24.1432 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8758 out of 12241 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12241 out of 167542 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 166985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2096 to 114.3128 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3760 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2096 to 114.3128 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3760 deg
Loaded 15290 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8659 out of 12225 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12225 out of 166985 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 133 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
3.1 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
3.1 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.7 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JwYGipeMqF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=53, blended=20873, bad_region=1, passed=167489
Got 167489 stars (including 146337 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167489 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4800 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4801 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4765 stars left (next iteration limit 5242)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits N_match=4765 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=1316 n_q2=1150 n_q3=1167 n_q4=1132 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.302
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4765 N_valid=4765 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.254 p95_sep_arcsec=1.216 n_q1=1316 n_q2=1150 n_q3=1167 n_q4=1132 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.T7E7jIkQ6X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20907, bad_region=3, passed=166934
Got 166934 stars (including 145737 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 166934 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4796 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4797 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4764 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4764 stars left (next iteration limit 5241)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits N_match=4764 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=1335 n_q2=1141 n_q3=1157 n_q4=1131 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.301
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4764 N_valid=4764 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.259 p95_sep_arcsec=1.145 n_q1=1335 n_q2=1141 n_q3=1157 n_q4=1131 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.MMySzLPqku (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=13155, bad_region=48, passed=126840
Got 126840 stars (including 113492 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 126840 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4808 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 126840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 126840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4763 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 126840 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4763 stars left (next iteration limit 5239)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4763 robust_rms=13.113 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.983 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.983 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4763 robust_rms=0.402 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.862 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.862 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4763 robust_rms=0.290 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.492 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.492 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4763 robust_rms_before=0.290 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.341 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.290 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.497 worst_region_rms_after=0.492 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.497 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.492
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.497 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.497 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.290 arcsec matched=4763
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits N_match=4763 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1457 n_q2=1024 n_q3=1213 n_q4=1069 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.158
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4763 N_valid=4763 bias_ra_arcsec=0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.022 median_sep_arcsec=0.245 p95_sep_arcsec=1.578 n_q1=1457 n_q2=1024 n_q3=1213 n_q4=1069 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.lbboI4PKlg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=13146, bad_region=48, passed=125733
Got 125733 stars (including 112391 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 125733 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4809 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 125733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 125733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 125733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5243)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4766 robust_rms=13.026 arcsec worst_region_rms=28.672 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=28.672 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4766 robust_rms=0.411 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.876 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.876 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4766 robust_rms=0.291 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.489 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.489 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4766 robust_rms_before=0.291 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.344 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.291 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.502 worst_region_rms_after=0.489 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.502 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.489
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.502 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.502 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.291 arcsec matched=4766
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1464 n_q2=1015 n_q3=1219 n_q4=1068 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.174
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4766 N_valid=4766 bias_ra_arcsec=0.011 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.020 median_sep_arcsec=0.243 p95_sep_arcsec=1.550 n_q1=1464 n_q2=1015 n_q3=1219 n_q4=1068 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-34-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0445.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_033731_TTUQ1b1x1_773316_Z5EJWxRe/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:08:10.32 +33:00:50.7: 14.95 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:49:02.37 +32:47:45.5: 15.01 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:46:09.88 +33:33:11.4: 14.90 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:39:00.80 +29:37:00.9: 14.70 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:39:04.72 +30:53:36.4: 14.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:13:08.97 +25:55:07.3: 14.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:01:51.42 +32:21:56.2: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:39:00.80 +29:37:00.9: 14.85 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:08:10.32 +33:00:50.7: 15.08 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:49:02.37 +32:47:45.5: 14.76 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:46:09.88 +33:33:11.4: 14.76 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:00.80 +29:37:00.9: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8835 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:10.32 +33:00:50.7: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9052 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:02.37 +32:47:45.5: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8703 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:46:09.88 +33:33:11.4: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6498 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:13:08.97 +25:55:07.3: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:39:04.72 +30:53:36.4: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:08.97 +25:55:07.3: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4138 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:04.72 +30:53:36.4: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4221 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:43:51.21 +27:28:05.3: 14.38 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:01:51.42 +32:21:56.2: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:51.42 +32:21:56.2: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4789 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:43:51.21 +27:28:05.3: 14.39 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:51.21 +27:28:05.3: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3577 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:25:12.83 +27:58:53.8: 14.47 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:28:24.87 +30:34:11.8: 14.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:22:58.75 +25:29:59.9: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:54:50.38 +29:12:02.0: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:25:12.83 +27:58:53.8: 14.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:12.83 +27:58:53.8: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3822 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:28:24.87 +30:34:11.8: 14.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:24.87 +30:34:11.8: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2844 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:22:58.75 +25:29:59.9: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:22:58.75 +25:29:59.9: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0461 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:24:57.05 +32:51:55.2: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:54:50.38 +29:12:02.0: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:50.38 +29:12:02.0: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8060 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:24:57.05 +32:51:55.2: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:24:57.05 +32:51:55.2: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9729 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:18:07.64 +30:44:11.4: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:22:36.49 +34:08:59.0: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:18:07.64 +30:44:11.4: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:30:28.75 +33:49:31.1: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:22:36.49 +34:08:59.0: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:30:28.75 +33:49:31.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:25:07.52 +27:05:56.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:25:07.52 +27:05:56.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:07.52 +27:05:56.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:27:03.05 +31:58:52.2: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:27:03.05 +31:58:52.2: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:03.05 +31:58:52.2: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9461 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:26:05.06 +30:18:17.8: 14.26 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:38:51.20 +33:13:39.2: 14.36 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:03:38.55 +29:41:42.7: 14.21 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:26:05.06 +30:18:17.8: 14.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:05.06 +30:18:17.8: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1223 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:38:51.20 +33:13:39.2: 14.22 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:03:38.55 +29:41:42.7: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:38:51.20 +33:13:39.2: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2711 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:38.55 +29:41:42.7: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1867 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:49:57.32 +24:55:59.3: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:49:57.32 +24:55:59.3: 14.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:57.32 +24:55:59.3: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3100 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:29:42.87 +34:32:23.2: 14.35 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:29:42.87 +34:32:23.2: 14.21 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:42.87 +34:32:23.2: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3211 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:23:04.55 +32:25:56.4: 14.50 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:14:48.81 +31:28:42.4: 14.46 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:25:38.81 +30:16:25.8: 15.34 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:14:48.81 +31:28:42.4: 14.26 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:23:04.55 +32:25:56.4: 14.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:14:48.81 +31:28:42.4: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1959 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:23:04.55 +32:25:56.4: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3716 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:25:38.81 +30:16:25.8: 15.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:50:44.26 +26:16:24.7: 14.68 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:38.81 +30:16:25.8: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7958 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:26:13.29 +31:13:45.7: 14.92 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:55:58.34 +32:48:11.0: 15.28 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:50:44.26 +26:16:24.7: 14.74 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:50:44.26 +26:16:24.7: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8155 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:26:13.29 +31:13:45.7: 15.00 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:55:58.34 +32:48:11.0: 15.40 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:13.29 +31:13:45.7: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9678 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:58.34 +32:48:11.0: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9441 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:28:19.97 +26:20:44.4: 15.13 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:35:51.51 +31:07:33.6: 14.78 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:00:33.55 +28:31:35.4: 15.07 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:28:19.97 +26:20:44.4: 14.92 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:19.97 +26:20:44.4: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9530 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:35:51.51 +31:07:33.6: 15.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:35:51.51 +31:07:33.6: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9729 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:00:33.55 +28:31:35.4: 15.19 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:00:33.55 +28:31:35.4: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9986 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193180.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193575.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out193815.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 55s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191915_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 191915_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191920_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 191920_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191926_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 191926_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191934_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 191934_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191935_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 191935_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191936_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 191936_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191939_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 191939_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191942_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 191942_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:51.67 +28:34:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191951_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 191951_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191962_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 191962_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:28.54 +29:52:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191974_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 191974_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191978_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 191978_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:25.13 +30:58:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191987_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 191987_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191989_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 191989_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191994_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 191994_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:02.87 +34:47:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191998_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 191998_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:25.17 +33:47:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192006_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192006_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192009_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192009_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:49.94 +28:05:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192015_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192015_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192016_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192016_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192018_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192018_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192019_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192019_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:34.48 +34:16:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192030_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192030_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192037_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192037_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:35.76 +31:57:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192038_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192038_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:37.73 +30:23:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192039_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192039_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:27.57 +31:09:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192049_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192049_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192058_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192058_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:57.13 +27:55:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192065_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192065_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:47.26 +26:05:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192066_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192066_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:25.92 +31:14:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192071_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192071_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192075_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:43.89 +29:29:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192076_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192076_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:04.38 +26:33:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192113_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192113_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:04.52 +25:21:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192143_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192143_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:20.62 +24:47:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192327_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192327_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:42.13 +27:55:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192399_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192399_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:46.43 +28:38:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192514_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192514_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:54.53 +27:49:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192843_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192843_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:17.72 +27:48:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192875_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192875_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:51.05 +32:48:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192908_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 192908_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:52.04 +29:43:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193138_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 193138_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:15.56 +27:12:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193180_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
Preparing report for the candidate 193180_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193195_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 193195_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:23.56 +25:04:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193487_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 193487_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:08.24 +33:08:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193575_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
Preparing report for the candidate 193575_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193590_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 193590_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.10 +32:21:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193668_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 193668_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:31.36 +30:38:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193699_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 193699_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:27.41 +25:34:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193815_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
Preparing report for the candidate 193815_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193816_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 193816_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:03.12 +27:02:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193842_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 193842_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:13.65 +28:32:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193854_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 193854_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:49.04 +25:18:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193860_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 193860_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:46.66 +26:19:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193905_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 193905_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:02.92 +25:10:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193923_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 193923_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:01.27 +26:03:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194009_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194009_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:36.71 +30:31:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194053_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194053_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:20.91 +30:56:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194087_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194087_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:25.70 +24:59:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194092_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194092_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194095_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194095_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.29 +26:04:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194114_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194114_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:51.88 +27:10:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194126_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194126_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:53.52 +26:47:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194168_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194168_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.55 +26:19:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194280_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194280_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:57.32 +32:46:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194310_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194310_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:13.71 +25:34:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194345_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194345_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:30.78 +32:10:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194492_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194492_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194507_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194507_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:28.36 +28:45:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:30.85 +32:10:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194695_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194695_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:41.08 +32:38:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194721_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194721_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:44.52 +26:17:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194754_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194754_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:50.74 +25:33:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194778_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194778_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:58.60 +27:40:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194800_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194800_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:24.58 +25:21:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194920_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194920_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:31.75 +30:51:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194945_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194945_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:57.84 +30:51:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194948_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194948_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:02.00 +31:30:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194971_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194971_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:04.11 +28:25:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194989_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 194989_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:44.03 +31:28:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195012_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195012_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:08.44 +27:43:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195041_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195041_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:07.03 +29:52:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195098_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195098_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195151_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195151_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:35.52 +28:45:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195153_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195153_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:53.51 +31:36:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195203_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195203_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195216_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195216_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195245_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195245_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:36.16 +32:49:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195253_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195253_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:07.85 +32:34:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195301_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195301_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:09.63 +32:24:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195304_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195304_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:51.43 +32:06:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195454_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195454_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:22.08 +30:06:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195520_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195520_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195523_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195523_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:07.82 +34:07:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195529_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195529_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:53.52 +27:10:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195531_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195531_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:17.40 +27:35:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195542_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195542_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:34.73 +28:23:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195543_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195543_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195544_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195544_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:46.34 +28:54:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195561_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195561_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:46.42 +26:31:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195600_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195600_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:02.29 +28:24:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195624_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195624_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:45.60 +31:19:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195629_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195629_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:09.93 +28:24:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195663_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195663_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:25.19 +28:57:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195840_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195840_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:46.17 +26:53:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195853_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195853_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:44.10 +34:37:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195950_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195950_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195954_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195954_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195962_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 195962_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196002_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 196002_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:10.54 +34:18:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196112_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 196112_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:43.64 +31:27:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196175_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 196175_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:56.31 +29:18:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196282_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 196282_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196442_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 196442_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:13.64 +31:58:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196566_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 196566_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196617_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 196617_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196626_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 196626_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196643_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 196643_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:53.19 +27:01:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196673_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 196673_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196722_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 196722_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196762_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 196762_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 108118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:42.71 +30:33:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191008_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
Preparing report for the candidate 191008_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188699_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 188699_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:18.58 +28:38:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62271_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 62271_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59889_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 59889_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:54.62 +27:45:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.18 +33:22:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20138_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 20138_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:33.97 +25:59:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.08 +30:16:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85332_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 85332_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:14.15 +29:07:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.23 +27:57:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166693_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 166693_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:45.16 +34:06:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55671_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446
The candidate 55671_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-35-44_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0446 did not pass the final checks
