This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3980 2461347.8980 12.74 04:21:06.74 +26:53:39.0
170.30169 -16.13043 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.344 Desiderata 0 0 0 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:21:06.74 +26:53:39.0: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:21:06.74 +26:53:39.0: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3980* 04 21 06.74 +26 53 39.0 12.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8980,12.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3980 12.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3980 2461347.8980 12.84 04:22:47.99 +25:55:28.9
171.31229 -16.50723 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.112 Iphigenia 0 -1 1 13.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:22:47.99 +25:55:28.9: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:22:47.99 +25:55:28.9: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3980* 04 22 47.99 +25 55 28.9 12.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8980,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3980 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3980 2461347.8980 12.91 04:28:55.76 +29:55:51.8
169.18517 -12.81269 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.224 Oceana -0 0 0 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:28:55.76 +29:55:51.8: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:28:55.76 +29:55:51.8: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3980* 04 28 55.76 +29 55 51.8 12.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8980,12.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3980 12.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3980 2461347.8980 14.24 04:02:15.47 +24:57:02.3
168.66781 -20.52824 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.341 California 1 -0 1 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:02:15.47 +24:57:02.3: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:02:15.47 +24:57:02.3: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3980* 04 02 15.47 +24 57 02.3 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8980,14.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3980 14.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3980 2461347.8980 14.38 03:47:47.31 +26:48:05.6
164.77017 -21.40637 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.427 Galene -0 0 0 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:47:47.31 +26:48:05.6: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:47:47.31 +26:48:05.6: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3980* 03 47 47.31 +26 48 05.6 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8980,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3980 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3980 2461347.8980 14.94 04:12:56.80 +32:57:24.3
164.52401 -13.19006 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.784 Pickeringia -0 -0 0 15.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:12:56.80 +32:57:24.3: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:12:56.80 +32:57:24.3: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3980* 04 12 56.80 +32 57 24.3 14.9 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8980,14.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3980 14.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461347.89839558 03.11.2026 09:33:31.378 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 21
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14186
Objects passed selection criteria: 14180
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13609
Average stars matched: 13112.5 (96.3517 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 240008 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 03:40:50 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461347.89839558 03.11.2026 09:33:31.378 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 90
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.93
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 40 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 93109
Objects passed selection criteria: 92913
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 87675.8
Average stars matched: 84906.2 (96.8412 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 480912 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 03:42:25 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.89768642
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:54.342 +30:01:50.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 03:59:54.342 +30:01:50.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0372 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:57.190 +30:01:15.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 03:59:57.190 +30:01:15.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0238 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:59:54.342 +30:01:50.25
Second-epoch second image center 03:59:57.190 +30:01:15.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01419 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.i5haSvM5Li
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FfwaPVZT8L
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HUfR6cY3Yz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits &> /tmp/tmp.49L9Gg26vM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3062 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3062 deg
Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5544 out of 6056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6056 out of 13390 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.967300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.967300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.71
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.71
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3062 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3062 deg
Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5544 out of 6056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6056 out of 13390 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5733 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3107 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5733 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3107 deg
Loaded 7269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5557 out of 6071 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6071 out of 13513 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 20 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.i5haSvM5Li (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13390
Got 13390 stars (including 12252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1524 n_q2=1103 n_q3=892 n_q4=1376 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4895 N_valid=4895 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.005 bias_dec_arcsec=0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.259 p95_sep_arcsec=0.880 n_q1=1524 n_q2=1103 n_q3=892 n_q4=1376 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.FfwaPVZT8L (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13513
Got 13513 stars (including 12361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1523 n_q2=1108 n_q3=895 n_q4=1373 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4899 N_valid=4899 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.012 bias_dec_arcsec=0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.267 p95_sep_arcsec=0.918 n_q1=1523 n_q2=1108 n_q3=895 n_q4=1373 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HUfR6cY3Yz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=821, bad_region=1, passed=13965
Got 13965 stars (including 13129 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13965 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4887 stars left (next iteration limit 5376)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=11.872 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.852 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.852 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=0.370 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.884 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.884 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=0.276 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.521 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.521 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4887 robust_rms_before=0.892 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.307 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.276 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.587 worst_region_rms_after=0.521 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.209 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.521
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.sip_refit.35idps/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.sip_refit.35idps/candidate.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:54.365 +30:01:49.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 13965 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.sip_refit.35idps/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_862225.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.sip_refit.35idps/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.rQna6T' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_862225.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.892 -> 0.276 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4887 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4753 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4753 pairs (4887 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4753 robust_rms=11.888 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.398 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.398 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4753 robust_rms=0.368 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.884 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.884 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4753 robust_rms=0.275 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.521 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.521 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4753 robust_rms_before=0.275 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.275 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.275 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.521 worst_region_rms_after=0.521 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.521 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.521
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.sip_refit.yMcwJE/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.sip_refit.yMcwJE/candidate.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:54.365 +30:01:49.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 13965 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.sip_refit.yMcwJE/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_865197.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.sip_refit.yMcwJE/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.8FEgTz' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_865197.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.275 -> 0.275 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits N_match=4753 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1531 n_q2=1072 n_q3=880 n_q4=1270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4753 N_valid=4753 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.007 bias_dec_arcsec=0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.232 p95_sep_arcsec=0.957 n_q1=1531 n_q2=1072 n_q3=880 n_q4=1270 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.49L9Gg26vM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=810, bad_region=0, passed=13844
Got 13844 stars (including 13022 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13844 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4887 stars left (next iteration limit 5375)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=11.936 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.743 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.743 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=0.426 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.825 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.825 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4887 robust_rms=0.307 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.553 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.553 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4887 robust_rms_before=0.909 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.306 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.307 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.582 worst_region_rms_after=0.553 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.227 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.553
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.582 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.582 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.306 arcsec matched=4887
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits N_match=4887 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=1572 n_q2=1100 n_q3=908 n_q4=1307 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4887 N_valid=4887 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.425 bias_dec_arcsec=0.551 median_sep_arcsec=0.815 p95_sep_arcsec=1.777 n_q1=1572 n_q2=1100 n_q3=908 n_q4=1307 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.233
ref2=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.337 worst_q_ratio=1.288
new1=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits sigma_overall=0.295 worst_q_ratio=1.201
new2=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits sigma_overall=0.310 worst_q_ratio=1.219
reference average sigma_overall=0.338 worst_q_ratio=1.2605
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (4899 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443_astrometric_residuals.png (4753 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444_astrometric_residuals.png (4887 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:15:53.66 +32:19:28.8: 12.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:21:41.06 +30:11:52.8: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:07:43.94 +31:49:37.2: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:26:56.55 +34:22:43.8: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:02:05.07 +31:23:51.6: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:21:51.91 +27:16:11.5: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:07:06.10 +30:10:47.9: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:04:06.87 +30:42:41.2: 12.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:24:00.53 +33:51:47.6: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:00:03.29 +27:55:04.2: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:15:53.66 +32:19:28.8: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:21:41.06 +30:11:52.8: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:07:43.94 +31:49:37.2: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:53.66 +32:19:28.8: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4121 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:41.06 +30:11:52.8: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4933 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:43.94 +31:49:37.2: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4732 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:26:56.55 +34:22:43.8: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:56.55 +34:22:43.8: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5253 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:07:06.10 +30:10:47.9: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:06.10 +30:10:47.9: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5002 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:21:51.91 +27:16:11.5: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:51.91 +27:16:11.5: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4982 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:02:05.07 +31:23:51.6: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:00:03.29 +27:55:04.2: 12.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:04:06.87 +30:42:41.2: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:24:00.53 +33:51:47.6: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:05.07 +31:23:51.6: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5184 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:03.29 +27:55:04.2: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5440 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:06.87 +30:42:41.2: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5235 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:00.53 +33:51:47.6: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5272 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:00:46.17 +32:09:20.7: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:00:46.17 +32:09:20.7: 12.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:46.17 +32:09:20.7: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5471 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20887_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 20887_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20888_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 20888_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20919_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 20919_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:56.04 +30:22:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20926_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 20926_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:11.18 +31:27:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20941_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 20941_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:15.22 +33:48:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20954_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 20954_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:04.99 +25:42:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20959_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 20959_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:53.65 +32:11:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20968_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 20968_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20969_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 20969_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:47.98 +31:30:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20972_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 20972_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20977_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 20977_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20978_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 20978_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20979_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 20979_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20980_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 20980_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20983_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 20983_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20987_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 20987_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20988_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 20988_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20992_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 20992_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11141_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 11141_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:42.35 +26:27:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01673_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 01673_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:37.97 +34:15:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:54.365 +30:01:49.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 03:59:54.365 +30:01:49.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0371 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:57.190 +30:01:15.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 03:59:57.190 +30:01:15.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0238 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:59:54.365 +30:01:49.71
Second-epoch second image center 03:59:57.190 +30:01:15.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01403 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R8qDI4yajw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uVgmMx0zLt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5aqVVHLOWp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qTCHkKJNiD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3061 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3061 deg
Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4826 out of 6103 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6103 out of 99190 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.833900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.833900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.93
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.90
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.90
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3061 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3061 deg
Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4826 out of 6103 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6103 out of 99190 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 98825 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5581 to 69.6814 deg, Dec +24.3528 to +35.3112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5581 to 69.6814 deg, Dec 24.3528 to 35.3112 deg
Loaded 7286 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4805 out of 6109 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6109 out of 98825 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 81 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
1.9 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.9 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.R8qDI4yajw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=7855, bad_region=9, passed=99158
Got 99158 stars (including 91129 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99158 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4903 stars left (next iteration limit 5393)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=4903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1459 n_q2=1121 n_q3=933 n_q4=1390 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4903 N_valid=4903 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=0.006 median_sep_arcsec=0.249 p95_sep_arcsec=0.881 n_q1=1459 n_q2=1121 n_q3=933 n_q4=1390 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.uVgmMx0zLt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=7957, bad_region=10, passed=98800
Got 98800 stars (including 90683 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98800 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=1460 n_q2=1117 n_q3=937 n_q4=1390 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4904 N_valid=4904 bias_ra_arcsec=0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=0.014 median_sep_arcsec=0.258 p95_sep_arcsec=0.939 n_q1=1460 n_q2=1117 n_q3=937 n_q4=1390 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.5aqVVHLOWp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=5233, bad_region=47, passed=77516
Got 77516 stars (including 72153 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77516 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77516 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77516 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77516 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=12.157 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.608 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.608 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.378 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.894 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.894 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.277 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.480 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.480 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4890 robust_rms_before=0.276 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.297 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.277 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.516 worst_region_rms_after=0.480 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.516 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.480
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.516 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.516 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.276 arcsec matched=4890
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.248 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=1537 n_q2=1082 n_q3=937 n_q4=1334 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4890 N_valid=4890 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.010 bias_dec_arcsec=0.017 median_sep_arcsec=0.234 p95_sep_arcsec=1.181 n_q1=1537 n_q2=1082 n_q3=937 n_q4=1334 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qTCHkKJNiD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=5291, bad_region=48, passed=77390
Got 77390 stars (including 71966 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77390 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5376)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=12.221 arcsec worst_region_rms=30.281 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=30.281 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.437 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.815 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.815 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.304 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.543 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.543 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4888 robust_rms_before=0.921 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.299 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.304 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.564 worst_region_rms_after=0.543 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.246 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.543
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.564 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.564 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.299 arcsec matched=4888
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.274 n_q1=1534 n_q2=1094 n_q3=933 n_q4=1327 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4888 N_valid=4888 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.434 bias_dec_arcsec=0.560 median_sep_arcsec=0.834 p95_sep_arcsec=1.789 n_q1=1534 n_q2=1094 n_q3=933 n_q4=1327 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-32-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0443.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_033546_TTUQ1b1x1_576793_Q4IA2fQy/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:18:55.40 +27:05:35.3: 14.68 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:11:11.85 +33:21:23.8: 14.82 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:56:53.28 +28:11:30.8: 15.04 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:42:46.86 +33:54:29.3: 14.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:47:16.33 +30:41:59.1: 14.82 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:58:31.90 +33:03:04.7: 15.08 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:54:52.00 +29:35:05.2: 14.52 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:32:29.43 +29:12:59.1: 14.99 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:19:44.74 +26:32:26.9: 15.05 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:16:49.65 +31:38:31.5: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:11:11.85 +33:21:23.8: 15.02 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:58:31.90 +33:03:04.7: 15.14 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:54:52.00 +29:35:05.2: 14.64 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:42:46.86 +33:54:29.3: 14.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:11.85 +33:21:23.8: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9060 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:32:29.43 +29:12:59.1: 14.91 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:56:53.28 +28:11:30.8: 15.22 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:31.90 +33:03:04.7: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0171 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:18:55.40 +27:05:35.3: 14.78 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:47:16.33 +30:41:59.1: 14.95 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:19:44.74 +26:32:26.9: 14.68 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:52.00 +29:35:05.2: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5970 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:46.86 +33:54:29.3: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3702 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:55.40 +27:05:35.3: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7770 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:32:29.43 +29:12:59.1: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9963 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:53.28 +28:11:30.8: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9614 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:47:16.33 +30:41:59.1: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.9319 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:44.74 +26:32:26.9: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6958 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:16:49.65 +31:38:31.5: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:49.65 +31:38:31.5: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2240 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:41:58.80 +33:55:08.0: 13.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:25:56.87 +30:16:05.7: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:28:33.19 +34:05:14.2: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:41:24.20 +30:34:00.5: 13.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:40:42.19 +34:02:46.4: 13.95 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:34:42.34 +34:03:43.6: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:19:29.37 +30:51:26.6: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:21:06.74 +26:53:39.0: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:22:47.99 +25:55:28.9: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:28:55.76 +29:55:51.8: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:41:58.80 +33:55:08.0: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:58.80 +33:55:08.0: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5441 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:25:56.87 +30:16:05.7: 12.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:56.87 +30:16:05.7: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6836 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:28:33.19 +34:05:14.2: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:34:42.34 +34:03:43.6: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:40:42.19 +34:02:46.4: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:33.19 +34:05:14.2: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0335 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:42.34 +34:03:43.6: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9364 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:41:24.20 +30:34:00.5: 13.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:42.19 +34:02:46.4: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0887 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:24.20 +30:34:00.5: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7067 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:22:47.99 +25:55:28.9: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:19:29.37 +30:51:26.6: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:28:55.76 +29:55:51.8: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:29.37 +30:51:26.6: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6701 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:21:06.74 +26:53:39.0: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:28:08.65 +33:29:23.2: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:11:06.06 +33:36:49.2: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:07:46.82 +33:39:12.4: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:46:03.28 +28:51:33.9: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:41.73 +28:44:13.6: 13.94 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:59:36.64 +31:21:51.1: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:28:08.65 +33:29:23.2: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:28:08.65 +33:29:23.2: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3207 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:07:46.82 +33:39:12.4: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:46.82 +33:39:12.4: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4742 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:46:03.28 +28:51:33.9: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:11:06.06 +33:36:49.2: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:03.28 +28:51:33.9: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6560 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:06.06 +33:36:49.2: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7340 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:41.73 +28:44:13.6: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:41.73 +28:44:13.6: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7462 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:59:36.64 +31:21:51.1: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:36.64 +31:21:51.1: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9436 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:24:30.49 +29:02:32.3: 14.06 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:19:11.77 +33:01:10.0: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:20:15.01 +28:47:35.2: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:09:38.28 +27:52:57.1: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:24:30.49 +29:02:32.3: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:30.49 +29:02:32.3: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0013 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:26:33.96 +29:16:14.6: 14.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:19:11.77 +33:01:10.0: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:11.77 +33:01:10.0: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0948 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:09:38.28 +27:52:57.1: 13.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:20:15.01 +28:47:35.2: 14.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:09:38.28 +27:52:57.1: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0106 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:15.01 +28:47:35.2: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0213 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:35:53.68 +33:37:37.1: 14.15 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:02:15.47 +24:57:02.3: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:26:33.96 +29:16:14.6: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:33.96 +29:16:14.6: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2737 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:08:38.84 +31:22:08.1: 14.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:38:41.00 +28:22:13.0: 14.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:35:53.68 +33:37:37.1: 14.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:58:59.98 +32:00:40.8: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:02:15.47 +24:57:02.3: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:53.68 +33:37:37.1: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2919 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:26:34.70 +30:35:35.1: 14.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:08:38.84 +31:22:08.1: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:38:41.00 +28:22:13.0: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:58:59.98 +32:00:40.8: 14.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:38.84 +31:22:08.1: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2316 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:38:41.00 +28:22:13.0: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2312 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:59.98 +32:00:40.8: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1706 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:26:34.70 +30:35:35.1: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:34.70 +30:35:35.1: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3627 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:57:07.82 +32:01:49.2: 14.10 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:03:49.58 +29:10:38.1: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:15:25.48 +29:21:15.5: 14.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:39:24.45 +26:50:27.6: 14.26 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:45:08.71 +29:36:52.6: 14.53 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:03:49.58 +29:10:38.1: 14.29 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:53:29.20 +28:09:12.6: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:49.58 +29:10:38.1: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4044 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:57:07.82 +32:01:49.2: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:07.82 +32:01:49.2: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2834 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:15:25.48 +29:21:15.5: 14.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:45:08.71 +29:36:52.6: 14.44 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:39:24.45 +26:50:27.6: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:15:25.48 +29:21:15.5: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3541 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:53:29.20 +28:09:12.6: 14.55 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:08.71 +29:36:52.6: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4278 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:39:24.45 +26:50:27.6: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1684 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:29.20 +28:09:12.6: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4180 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:10.04 +29:00:39.1: 14.33 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:47:47.31 +26:48:05.6: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:21:23.85 +30:16:35.8: 14.63 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:05:02.19 +34:24:17.7: 14.55 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:11:13.13 +33:36:34.7: 14.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:26:51.68 +33:00:17.3: 14.43 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:10.04 +29:00:39.1: 14.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:47:47.31 +26:48:05.6: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:10.04 +29:00:39.1: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3480 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:21:23.85 +30:16:35.8: 14.69 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:05:02.19 +34:24:17.7: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:26:51.68 +33:00:17.3: 14.50 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:11:13.13 +33:36:34.7: 14.90 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:23.85 +30:16:35.8: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5577 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:02.19 +34:24:17.7: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5444 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:13.13 +33:36:34.7: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6607 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:51.68 +33:00:17.3: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5308 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:31:17.13 +26:37:48.1: 15.65 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:03:50.50 +35:01:38.1: 15.19 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:36:54.64 +33:08:18.5: 15.24 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:00:01.24 +25:53:05.2: 15.03 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:23:45.85 +32:35:01.5: 15.51 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:31:17.13 +26:37:48.1: 15.60 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.62 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:17.13 +26:37:48.1: ref_mag=15.62 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=15.0216 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:03:50.50 +35:01:38.1: 15.30 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:36:54.64 +33:08:18.5: 15.16 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:00:01.24 +25:53:05.2: 15.25 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:23:45.85 +32:35:01.5: 15.27 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:50.50 +35:01:38.1: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8544 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:54.64 +33:08:18.5: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0017 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:01.24 +25:53:05.2: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9651 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:45.85 +32:35:01.5: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9251 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:33:56.32 +25:38:17.1: 15.57 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:06:55.64 +34:33:23.2: 15.71 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:12:56.80 +32:57:24.3: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:13:06.73 +27:04:45.9: 15.08 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:33:56.32 +25:38:17.1: 15.71 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.63 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:33:56.32 +25:38:17.1: ref_mag=15.63 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.9263 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:43:46.05 +33:51:09.4: 15.63 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:06:55.64 +34:33:23.2: 15.51 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:12:56.80 +32:57:24.3: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:13:06.73 +27:04:45.9: 15.29 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.59 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:55.64 +34:33:23.2: ref_mag=15.59 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.2048 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:13:06.73 +27:04:45.9: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1688 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:43:46.05 +33:51:09.4: 15.61 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.62 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:46.05 +33:51:09.4: ref_mag=15.62 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1679 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:12:18.78 +33:14:20.3: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:12:18.78 +33:14:20.3: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:18.78 +33:14:20.3: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8229 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117771.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117791.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117799.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out118278.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out118436.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out118777.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 58s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117541_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117541_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117544_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117544_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117547_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117547_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117548_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117548_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117565_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117565_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117576_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117576_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117587_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117587_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117590_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117590_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117605_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117605_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117608_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117608_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:07.06 +34:44:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117610_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117610_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117612_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117612_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:27:04.72 +33:21:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117614_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117614_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117618_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117618_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117620_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117620_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117621_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117621_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117625_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117625_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117626_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117626_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117628_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117628_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:34.48 +34:52:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117689_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117689_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:49.10 +33:34:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117758_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117758_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117771_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
Preparing report for the candidate 117771_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117791_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
Preparing report for the candidate 117791_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117799_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
Preparing report for the candidate 117799_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117908_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117908_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:06.57 +33:36:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117917_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117917_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117950_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 117950_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118033_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118033_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:21.29 +33:28:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118037_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118037_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118045_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118045_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118071_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118071_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118082_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118082_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:39.98 +32:28:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118137_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118137_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118163_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118163_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:19.72 +33:46:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118182_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118182_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118193_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118193_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118211_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118211_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:53.65 +32:27:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118227_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118227_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118236_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118236_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:49.20 +34:28:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118265_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118265_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:41.92 +30:27:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118275_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118275_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118278_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
Preparing report for the candidate 118278_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118301_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118301_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118327_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118327_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118330_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118330_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118342_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118342_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118345_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118345_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118353_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118353_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:24.60 +31:03:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118354_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118354_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118360_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118360_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118372_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118372_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118413_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118413_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118428_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118428_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118429_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118429_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118431_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118431_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118436_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
Preparing report for the candidate 118436_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118442_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118442_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118485_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118485_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118499_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118499_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118642_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118642_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118689_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118689_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118697_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118697_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118714_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118714_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118755_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118755_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118770_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118770_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118775_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118775_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118777_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
Preparing report for the candidate 118777_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118819_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118819_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118914_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118914_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118916_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118916_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118927_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 118927_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49632_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 49632_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:16.89 +30:44:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112693_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 112693_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:39:03.07 +32:52:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110352_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 110352_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52535_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 52535_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:56.08 +30:22:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34592_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 34592_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:53.64 +32:11:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78181_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 78181_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:04.90 +25:42:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 11217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:15.27 +33:48:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 11025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:37.98 +34:15:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75492_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444
The candidate 75492_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_03-33-31_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0444 did not pass the final checks
