This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3347 2461347.8347 13.21 04:28:05.68 +02:00:39.4
192.73610 -30.31376 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.618 Elfriede 0 -0 0 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:28:05.68 +02:00:39.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:28:05.68 +02:00:39.4: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3347* 04 28 05.68 +02 00 39.4 13.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8347,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3347 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3347 2461347.8347 14.58 04:13:58.00 +06:18:47.7
186.29886 -30.72718 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1564 Srbija 0 0 0 14.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:13:58.00 +06:18:47.7: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:13:58.00 +06:18:47.7: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3347* 04 13 58.00 +06 18 47.7 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8347,14.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3347 14.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3347 2461347.8347 14.71 03:59:40.44 +06:42:42.9
183.36103 -33.28816 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.2235 Vittore -1 0 1 14.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:59:40.44 +06:42:42.9: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:59:40.44 +06:42:42.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3347* 03 59 40.44 +06 42 42.9 14.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8347,14.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3347 14.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3347 2461347.8347 14.96 04:22:44.89 +09:57:42.6
184.47681 -26.79219 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 8.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.874 Rotraut 1 1 1 15.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:22:44.89 +09:57:42.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:22:44.89 +09:57:42.6: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3347* 04 22 44.89 +09 57 42.6 15.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8347,14.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3347 14.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.69103028 21.01.2026 04:34:55.016 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
First image: 2461061.69103028 21.01.2026 04:34:55.016 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Last image: 2461347.83521898 03.11.2026 08:02:32.920 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8246
Objects passed selection criteria: 8223
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6332.75
Average stars matched: 5781 (91.2874 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233800 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 02:57:26 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.69103028 21.01.2026 04:34:55.016 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
First image: 2461061.69103028 21.01.2026 04:34:55.016 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Last image: 2461347.83521898 03.11.2026 08:02:32.920 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 83
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.09
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 49816
Objects passed selection criteria: 49702
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 39656.5
Average stars matched: 36117.5 (91.0759 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 266524 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 02:58:22 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.83422715
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:09.036 +05:59:57.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14
Second-epoch image center 04:17:09.036 +05:59:57.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0379 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:12.098 +05:59:44.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14
Second-epoch image center 04:17:12.098 +05:59:44.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0252 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:17:09.036 +05:59:57.83
Second-epoch second image center 04:17:12.098 +05:59:44.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01325 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f5srvwl6I3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bYjLbKsXRa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Xlkkv2UkY8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o77NgPmsmd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8663 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3081 to 72.2820 deg, Dec +0.6924 to +11.2683 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3081 to 72.2820 deg, Dec 0.6924 to 11.2683 deg
Loaded 5018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4111 out of 4342 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4342 out of 8663 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.922800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.922800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8663 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3081 to 72.2820 deg, Dec +0.6924 to +11.2683 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3081 to 72.2820 deg, Dec 0.6924 to 11.2683 deg
Loaded 5018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4111 out of 4342 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4342 out of 8663 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 7732 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.2889 to 72.2642 deg, Dec +0.7253 to +11.3032 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.2889 to 72.2642 deg, Dec 0.7253 to 11.3032 deg
Loaded 5008 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4066 out of 4298 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4298 out of 7732 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
2.1 pix Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.f5srvwl6I3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=654, bad_region=1709, passed=8663
Got 8663 stars (including 6418 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8663 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7295 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.236 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.234 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.207 n_q1=1740 n_q2=718 n_q3=1781 n_q4=660 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4899 N_valid=4899 bias_ra_arcsec=0.007 bias_dec_arcsec=0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.215 p95_sep_arcsec=0.697 n_q1=1740 n_q2=718 n_q3=1781 n_q4=660 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -region wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bYjLbKsXRa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=626, bad_region=1495, passed=7732
Got 7732 stars (including 5720 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7732 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6528 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6528 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6528 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=1755 n_q2=718 n_q3=1774 n_q4=652 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4899 N_valid=4899 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.002 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.009 median_sep_arcsec=0.286 p95_sep_arcsec=0.796 n_q1=1755 n_q2=718 n_q3=1774 n_q4=652 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits -region wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Xlkkv2UkY8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=512, bad_region=2721, passed=8912
Got 8912 stars (including 5822 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8912 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=7.966 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.026 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.026 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=0.392 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.121 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.121 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=0.300 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.437 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.437 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4891 robust_rms_before=0.794 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.300 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.300 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.467 worst_region_rms_after=0.437 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.958 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.437
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.467 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.467 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.300 arcsec matched=4891
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=1329 n_q2=1064 n_q3=1489 n_q4=1009 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.033
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4891 N_valid=4891 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.250 bias_dec_arcsec=0.524 median_sep_arcsec=0.703 p95_sep_arcsec=1.658 n_q1=1329 n_q2=1064 n_q3=1489 n_q4=1009 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.o77NgPmsmd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=541, bad_region=2748, passed=8824
Got 8824 stars (including 5692 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8824 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=7.944 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.060 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=16.060 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.431 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.914 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.914 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4897 robust_rms=0.343 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.434 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.434 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4897 robust_rms_before=0.864 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.343 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.343 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.458 worst_region_rms_after=0.434 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.942 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.434
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.458 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.458 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.343 arcsec matched=4897
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=1338 n_q2=1066 n_q3=1485 n_q4=1008 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4897 N_valid=4897 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.293 bias_dec_arcsec=0.540 median_sep_arcsec=0.774 p95_sep_arcsec=1.690 n_q1=1338 n_q2=1066 n_q3=1485 n_q4=1008 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits sigma_overall=0.254 worst_q_ratio=1.197
ref2=Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits sigma_overall=0.354 worst_q_ratio=1.246
new1=fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.033
new2=fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits sigma_overall=0.362 worst_q_ratio=1.088
reference average sigma_overall=0.304 worst_q_ratio=1.2215
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193_astrometric_residuals.png (4899 matched stars from wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108_astrometric_residuals.png (4899 matched stars from wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452_astrometric_residuals.png (4891 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453_astrometric_residuals.png (4897 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:34:51.08 +05:00:24.3: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:13:43.02 +06:37:25.1: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:25:22.55 +05:07:03.1: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:31:15.48 +06:34:10.9: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:22:40.00 +03:45:44.9: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:14:00.79 +05:53:43.4: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:17:25.15 +06:53:06.5: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:17:25.15 +06:53:06.5: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:31:15.48 +06:34:10.9: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:25.15 +06:53:06.5: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3124 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:34:51.08 +05:00:24.3: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:25:22.55 +05:07:03.1: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:14:00.79 +05:53:43.4: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:13:43.02 +06:37:25.1: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:22:40.00 +03:45:44.9: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:22.55 +05:07:03.1: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2215 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:00.79 +05:53:43.4: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2799 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:15.48 +06:34:10.9: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1844 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:51.08 +05:00:24.3: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1625 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:40.00 +03:45:44.9: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1351 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:13:43.02 +06:37:25.1: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3203 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21176_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 21176_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21179_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 21179_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21212_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 21212_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21222_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 21222_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21293_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 21293_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21295_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 21295_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21315_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 21315_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01031_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 01031_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:11.63 +09:56:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:09.036 +05:59:57.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14
Second-epoch image center 04:17:09.036 +05:59:57.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0379 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:17:12.098 +05:59:44.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:16.928 +05:58:49.14
Second-epoch image center 04:17:12.098 +05:59:44.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0252 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:17:09.036 +05:59:57.83
Second-epoch second image center 04:17:12.098 +05:59:44.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01325 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JJ4x9ongXs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2ESPzEvEdr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4tCQOu1RDY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits &> /tmp/tmp.runwooMeDo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits and wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 52195 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3081 to 72.2950 deg, Dec +0.6737 to +11.2686 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3081 to 72.2950 deg, Dec 0.6737 to 11.2686 deg
Loaded 5032 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3858 out of 4399 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4399 out of 52195 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.791450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.791450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.09
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.70
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.70
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 52195 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.3081 to 72.2950 deg, Dec +0.6737 to +11.2686 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.3081 to 72.2950 deg, Dec 0.6737 to 11.2686 deg
Loaded 5032 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3858 out of 4399 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4399 out of 52195 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 48772 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.2863 to 72.2652 deg, Dec +0.7157 to +11.3031 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.2863 to 72.2652 deg, Dec 0.7157 to 11.3031 deg
Loaded 5015 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3858 out of 4392 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4392 out of 48772 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 55 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
1.9 pix Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JJ4x9ongXs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2672, bad_region=8043, passed=52186
Got 52186 stars (including 41786 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52186 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4913 stars left (next iteration limit 5404)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits N_match=4913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.246 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.232 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.225 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.207 n_q1=1732 n_q2=718 n_q3=1791 n_q4=672 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4913 N_valid=4913 bias_ra_arcsec=0.009 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.213 p95_sep_arcsec=0.718 n_q1=1732 n_q2=718 n_q3=1791 n_q4=672 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits -region wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2ESPzEvEdr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2468, bad_region=7460, passed=48761
Got 48761 stars (including 39142 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48761 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=1733 n_q2=718 n_q3=1797 n_q4=663 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4911 N_valid=4911 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.000 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.276 p95_sep_arcsec=0.814 n_q1=1733 n_q2=718 n_q3=1797 n_q4=663 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits -region wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4tCQOu1RDY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2356, bad_region=11705, passed=48305
Got 48305 stars (including 35048 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48305 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=7.839 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.623 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.623 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.391 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.193 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.193 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.305 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.425 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.425 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4873 robust_rms_before=0.789 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.300 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.305 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.473 worst_region_rms_after=0.425 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.955 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.425
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 0.789 -> 0.305 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits is a symbolic link
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4873 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4766 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4766 pairs (4873 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4766 robust_rms=7.796 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.700 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.700 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4766 robust_rms=0.386 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.223 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.223 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4766 robust_rms=0.304 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.424 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.424 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4766 robust_rms_before=0.303 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.303 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.304 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.425 worst_region_rms_after=0.424 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.425 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.424
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 0.303 -> 0.304 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits is a symbolic link
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=1311 n_q2=1022 n_q3=1439 n_q4=994 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.065
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4766 N_valid=4766 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.252 bias_dec_arcsec=0.521 median_sep_arcsec=0.700 p95_sep_arcsec=1.568 n_q1=1311 n_q2=1022 n_q3=1439 n_q4=994 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.runwooMeDo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=2435, bad_region=11983, passed=49504
Got 49504 stars (including 35938 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49504 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4867 stars left (next iteration limit 5353)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4867 robust_rms=7.811 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.574 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=15.574 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4867 robust_rms=0.427 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.998 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.998 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4867 robust_rms=0.341 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.430 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.430 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4867 robust_rms_before=0.852 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.344 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.341 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.453 worst_region_rms_after=0.430 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.937 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.430
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.453 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.453 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.344 arcsec matched=4867
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits N_match=4867 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=1340 n_q2=1049 n_q3=1472 n_q4=1006 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4867 N_valid=4867 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.297 bias_dec_arcsec=0.536 median_sep_arcsec=0.771 p95_sep_arcsec=1.683 n_q1=1340 n_q2=1049 n_q3=1472 n_q4=1006 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-01-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0452.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_025216_TTUQ2b1x1_1634670_J5VMIORt/wcs_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:11:52.77 +06:49:34.7: 14.48 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:28:05.68 +02:00:39.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:59:36.94 +08:13:05.9: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:19:48.00 +06:45:31.4: 14.98 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:12:30.96 +07:06:21.6: 13.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:23:51.94 +06:56:30.1: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:12:56.47 +06:22:59.3: 14.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:27:49.18 +05:43:28.8: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:30:01.85 +08:42:26.6: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:13:58.00 +06:18:47.7: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:12:30.96 +07:06:21.6: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:12:56.47 +06:22:59.3: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:23:51.94 +06:56:30.1: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:27:49.18 +05:43:28.8: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:11:52.77 +06:49:34.7: 14.69 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:28:05.68 +02:00:39.4: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:19:48.00 +06:45:31.4: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:59:36.94 +08:13:05.9: 14.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:56.47 +06:22:59.3: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5705 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:30.96 +07:06:21.6: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2285 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:51.94 +06:56:30.1: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1472 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:52.77 +06:49:34.7: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5887 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:49.18 +05:43:28.8: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1816 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:48.00 +06:45:31.4: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7275 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:36.94 +08:13:05.9: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0551 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:30:01.85 +08:42:26.6: 14.33 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:01.85 +08:42:26.6: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5055 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:13:58.00 +06:18:47.7: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:13:44.32 +03:23:30.3: 14.45 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:28:10.90 +10:09:56.8: 14.45 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:22:31.53 +05:42:27.5: 14.47 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:17:56.61 +05:51:41.8: 14.64 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:23:34.60 +08:04:32.5: 14.49 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:23:52.34 +06:56:54.7: 14.68 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:03:40.18 +06:48:22.5: 14.61 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:06:01.87 +04:40:05.6: 14.94 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:28:10.90 +10:09:56.8: 14.24 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:23:52.34 +06:56:54.7: 14.56 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:23:34.60 +08:04:32.5: 14.38 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:17:56.61 +05:51:41.8: 14.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:13:44.32 +03:23:30.3: 14.57 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:22:31.53 +05:42:27.5: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:03:40.18 +06:48:22.5: 14.33 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:52.34 +06:56:54.7: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6832 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:34.60 +08:04:32.5: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5152 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:10.90 +10:09:56.8: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5880 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:56.61 +05:51:41.8: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5274 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:13:44.32 +03:23:30.3: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5519 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:40.18 +06:48:22.5: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6668 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:31.53 +05:42:27.5: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5647 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:06:01.87 +04:40:05.6: 15.07 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:01.87 +04:40:05.6: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7385 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:03:57.54 +05:39:00.1: 14.86 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:16:15.08 +06:23:16.3: 15.03 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:07:50.72 +09:56:25.0: 15.30 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:14:17.76 +04:24:18.2: 14.89 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:59:40.44 +06:42:42.9: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:19:47.18 +04:30:16.0: 14.77 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:32:14.96 +10:13:58.0: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:27:04.38 +04:06:49.2: 14.86 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:07:50.72 +09:56:25.0: 15.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:19:47.18 +04:30:16.0: 14.50 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:03:57.54 +05:39:00.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:16:15.08 +06:23:16.3: 14.99 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:14:17.76 +04:24:18.2: 14.89 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:32:14.96 +10:13:58.0: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:50.72 +09:56:25.0: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8885 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:59:40.44 +06:42:42.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:47.18 +04:30:16.0: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8078 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:57.54 +05:39:00.1: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6937 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:16:15.08 +06:23:16.3: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7903 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:14.96 +10:13:58.0: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8208 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:17.76 +04:24:18.2: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7953 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:27:04.38 +04:06:49.2: 14.94 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:04.38 +04:06:49.2: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7647 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:04:19.51 +03:58:20.1: 15.24 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:02:00.58 +02:37:39.5: 15.15 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:26:28.52 +07:42:07.4: 15.19 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:31:30.82 +08:55:55.4: 15.20 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:32:14.39 +09:24:28.8: 15.14 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:59:46.92 +07:13:29.2: 15.21 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:26:28.52 +07:42:07.4: 15.06 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:31:30.82 +08:55:55.4: 15.30 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:04:19.51 +03:58:20.1: 15.30 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:32:14.39 +09:24:28.8: 14.77 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:59:46.92 +07:13:29.2: 15.22 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:02:00.58 +02:37:39.5: 15.43 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:28.52 +07:42:07.4: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9437 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:30.82 +08:55:55.4: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9692 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:03:40.17 +04:39:16.4: 15.78 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:14.39 +09:24:28.8: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8163 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:19.51 +03:58:20.1: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9191 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:46.92 +07:13:29.2: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9628 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:00.58 +02:37:39.5: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8005 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:03:40.17 +04:39:16.4: 15.28 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:40.17 +04:39:16.4: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9738 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 03:59:53.28 +09:16:45.4: 14.83 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:00:09.59 +03:17:41.8: 15.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:33:08.10 +08:20:24.0: 15.23 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:04:00.73 +07:01:30.8: 15.36 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:10:48.62 +09:00:07.9: 15.12 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:01:42.55 +03:28:04.5: 15.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:04:00.73 +07:01:30.8: 15.38 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:01:42.55 +03:28:04.5: 15.37 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:10:48.62 +09:00:07.9: 15.07 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 03:59:53.28 +09:16:45.4: 15.37 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:33:08.10 +08:20:24.0: 14.72 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:00:09.59 +03:17:41.8: 15.32 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:48.62 +09:00:07.9: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9087 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:08.10 +08:20:24.0: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9275 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:00.73 +07:01:30.8: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9433 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:42.55 +03:28:04.5: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8084 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:53.28 +09:16:45.4: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9821 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:00:09.59 +03:17:41.8: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9695 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:04:56.21 +04:04:16.1: 14.82 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:04:56.21 +04:04:16.1: 14.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:56.21 +04:04:16.1: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7209 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:01:08.53 +01:49:01.1: 14.85 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:01:31.71 +02:12:32.4: 14.95 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:23:12.07 +06:42:00.6: 14.95 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:22:44.89 +09:57:42.6: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:20:15.32 +08:21:31.5: 15.47 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:06:35.57 +06:37:15.7: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:01:08.53 +01:49:01.1: 15.48 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:01:31.71 +02:12:32.4: 14.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:22:44.89 +09:57:42.6: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:06:35.57 +06:37:15.7: 15.65 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:23:12.07 +06:42:00.6: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:08.53 +01:49:01.1: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0077 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:20:15.32 +08:21:31.5: 15.55 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:31.71 +02:12:32.4: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9445 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:06:35.57 +06:37:15.7: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9693 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:12.07 +06:42:00.6: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.0069 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:15.32 +08:21:31.5: ref_mag=15.50 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0240 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:34:11.89 +03:39:45.4: 14.95 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:34:11.89 +03:39:45.4: 14.88 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:11.89 +03:39:45.4: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9121 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:33:41.74 +07:03:56.2: 15.54 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:01:44.67 +03:00:39.1: 15.22 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:26:12.19 +09:51:53.6: 15.58 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:10:52.33 +01:45:38.8: 15.41 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_22-34-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0193.fits at 04:20:55.31 +02:57:14.9: 15.04 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:20:55.31 +02:57:14.9: 15.14 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:26:12.19 +09:51:53.6: 15.72 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:33:41.74 +07:03:56.2: 15.62 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:01:44.67 +03:00:39.1: 15.19 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-44-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0108.fits at 04:10:52.33 +01:45:38.8: 15.10 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.63 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.58 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:55.31 +02:57:14.9: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9883 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:12.19 +09:51:53.6: ref_mag=15.63 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=15.0209 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:41.74 +07:03:56.2: ref_mag=15.58 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=15.0236 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:01:44.67 +03:00:39.1: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9065 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:52.33 +01:45:38.8: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0124 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66982.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70284.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out71466.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72267.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 86s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64474_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 64474_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64476_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 64476_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64483_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 64483_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64488_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 64488_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64489_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 64489_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64492_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 64492_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66187_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 66187_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:53.71 +07:07:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66982_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
Preparing report for the candidate 66982_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67907_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 67907_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:21.42 +06:13:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69062_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 69062_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70284_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
Preparing report for the candidate 70284_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70469_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 70469_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70579_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 70579_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70619_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 70619_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70626_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 70626_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70704_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 70704_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70732_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 70732_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70986_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 70986_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71125_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 71125_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71128_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 71128_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71135_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 71135_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71287_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 71287_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71419_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 71419_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71423_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 71423_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71466_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
Preparing report for the candidate 71466_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71492_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 71492_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71633_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 71633_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71661_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 71661_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71708_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 71708_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71755_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 71755_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71831_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 71831_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71999_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 71999_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72013_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 72013_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72078_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 72078_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72087_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 72087_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72098_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 72098_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72101_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 72101_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72106_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 72106_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72119_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 72119_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72122_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 72122_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72135_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 72135_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72179_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 72179_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72251_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 72251_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72263_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 72263_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72267_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
Preparing report for the candidate 72267_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72268_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 72268_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72269_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 72269_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72278_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 72278_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72279_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 72279_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72307_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 72307_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72308_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 72308_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72412_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 72412_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72424_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 72424_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72459_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 72459_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04926_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453
The candidate 04926_fd_Tau-08-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_02-02-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0453 did not pass the final checks
