This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3191 2461347.8191 12.96 04:22:52.07 +25:55:34.8
171.32175 -16.49481 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.112 Iphigenia 0 1 1 13.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:22:52.07 +25:55:34.8: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:22:52.07 +25:55:34.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3191* 04 22 52.07 +25 55 34.8 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8191,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3191 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3191 2461347.8191 13.89 04:48:16.66 +24:34:44.7
176.22439 -12.98127 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1219 Britta 0 0 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:16.66 +24:34:44.7: 16.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:16.66 +24:34:44.7: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3191* 04 48 16.66 +24 34 44.7 13.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8191,13.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3191 13.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3191 2461347.8191 13.99 04:46:26.58 +21:52:54.1
178.14100 -14.98001 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.940 Kordula 0 -1 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:26.58 +21:52:54.1: 16.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:26.58 +21:52:54.1: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3191* 04 46 26.58 +21 52 54.1 14.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8191,13.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3191 13.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3191 2461347.8191 14.52 04:35:44.94 +20:22:29.0
177.74807 -17.86916 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.311 Claudia 1 -0 1 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:44.94 +20:22:29.0: 16.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:44.94 +20:22:29.0: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3191* 04 35 44.94 +20 22 29.0 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8191,14.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3191 14.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3191 2461347.8191 14.84 04:55:42.52 +22:09:07.4
179.26625 -13.11099 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1728 Goethe Link 1 3 3 15.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:42.52 +22:09:07.4: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:42.52 +22:09:07.4: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3191* 04 55 42.52 +22 09 07.4 14.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8191,14.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3191 14.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461347.81937309 03.11.2026 07:39:43.835 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 15
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11239
Objects passed selection criteria: 11194
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8570
Average stars matched: 7779.5 (90.776 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236084 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 02:33:11 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461347.81937309 03.11.2026 07:39:43.835 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 126
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.93
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 77700
Objects passed selection criteria: 77506
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 60668.5
Average stars matched: 55601.5 (91.6481 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 292436 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 02:34:21 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.81888029
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.653 +21:59:57.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:56.653 +21:59:57.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0061 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:55.462 +22:00:30.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:55.462 +22:00:30.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0150 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:56.653 +21:59:57.78
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:55.462 +22:00:30.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01020 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.D2XfLARBZz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mqYFpuOyUX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fOo4v4qDZc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XAQ7Vyosis
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.991000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.991000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.75
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2796 deg
Loaded 5169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3956 out of 4300 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4300 out of 11076 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 14 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.1 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.D2XfLARBZz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=967, bad_region=2517, passed=11927
Got 11927 stars (including 8622 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4820 stars left (next iteration limit 5302)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4820 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1641 n_q2=611 n_q3=1816 n_q4=752 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4820 N_valid=4820 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.019 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.017 median_sep_arcsec=0.253 p95_sep_arcsec=1.217 n_q1=1641 n_q2=611 n_q3=1816 n_q4=752 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.mqYFpuOyUX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=897, bad_region=2444, passed=11076
Got 11076 stars (including 7922 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4818 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4818 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1645 n_q2=622 n_q3=1785 n_q4=766 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4818 N_valid=4818 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.016 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.292 p95_sep_arcsec=1.156 n_q1=1645 n_q2=622 n_q3=1785 n_q4=766 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fOo4v4qDZc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=719, bad_region=3431, passed=11646
Got 11646 stars (including 7701 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11646 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4870 stars left (next iteration limit 5357)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=8.140 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.188 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.188 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.472 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.738 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.738 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.392 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.579 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.579 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4870 robust_rms_before=1.104 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.416 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.392 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.631 worst_region_rms_after=0.579 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.187 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.579
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.631 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.631 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.416 arcsec matched=4870
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits N_match=4870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.482 n_q1=1433 n_q2=1119 n_q3=1510 n_q4=808 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4870 N_valid=4870 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.614 bias_dec_arcsec=0.706 median_sep_arcsec=1.032 p95_sep_arcsec=1.997 n_q1=1433 n_q2=1119 n_q3=1510 n_q4=808 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.XAQ7Vyosis (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=760, bad_region=3443, passed=11639
Got 11639 stars (including 7659 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11639 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5357)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=8.131 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.229 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.229 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.481 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.720 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.720 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.393 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.573 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.573 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4871 robust_rms_before=1.100 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.416 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.393 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.605 worst_region_rms_after=0.573 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.188 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.573
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.605 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.605 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.416 arcsec matched=4871
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.514 n_q1=1442 n_q2=1099 n_q3=1520 n_q4=810 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4871 N_valid=4871 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.600 bias_dec_arcsec=0.686 median_sep_arcsec=1.023 p95_sep_arcsec=1.960 n_q1=1442 n_q2=1099 n_q3=1520 n_q4=810 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.284
ref2=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.245
new1=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits sigma_overall=0.411 worst_q_ratio=1.172
new2=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits sigma_overall=0.410 worst_q_ratio=1.254
reference average sigma_overall=0.3385 worst_q_ratio=1.2645
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (4820 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202_astrometric_residuals.png (4818 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426_astrometric_residuals.png (4870 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427_astrometric_residuals.png (4871 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:33.66 +22:12:43.5: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:50.07 +22:54:24.3: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:44.28 +21:57:43.2: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:06.49 +21:14:33.1: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:07.54 +22:37:23.1: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:47.48 +22:21:26.7: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:03.70 +21:55:13.9: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:24:23.99 +17:53:04.2: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:39.70 +21:26:26.7: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:58.68 +22:49:42.5: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:03.70 +21:55:13.9: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:50.07 +22:54:24.3: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:44.28 +21:57:43.2: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:47.48 +22:21:26.7: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:33.66 +22:12:43.5: 12.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:24:23.99 +17:53:04.2: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:07.54 +22:37:23.1: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:06.49 +21:14:33.1: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:03.70 +21:55:13.9: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5319 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:50.07 +22:54:24.3: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5185 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:33.66 +22:12:43.5: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4596 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:47.48 +22:21:26.7: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2915 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:23.99 +17:53:04.2: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4550 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:06.49 +21:14:33.1: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4791 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:44.28 +21:57:43.2: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3624 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:07.54 +22:37:23.1: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5081 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:39.70 +21:26:26.7: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:58.68 +22:49:42.5: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:39.70 +21:26:26.7: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5891 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:58.68 +22:49:42.5: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5831 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:26.24 +22:23:30.3: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:45:28.80 +23:49:07.0: 12.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:26.24 +22:23:30.3: 12.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:45:28.80 +23:49:07.0: 12.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:26.24 +22:23:30.3: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5579 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:28.80 +23:49:07.0: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5734 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20722_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 20722_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:25.28 +17:54:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21797_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 21797_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21842_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 21842_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21899_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 21899_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:28.59 +26:10:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21949_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 21949_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21952_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 21952_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21995_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 21995_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22043_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 22043_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22066_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 22066_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22090_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 22090_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22106_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 22106_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22118_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 22118_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22121_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 22121_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22125_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 22125_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.653 +21:59:57.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:56.653 +21:59:57.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0061 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Image size: 937.1'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:55.462 +22:00:30.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:55.462 +22:00:30.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0150 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:56.653 +21:59:57.78
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:55.462 +22:00:30.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01020 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uEuW8Hq1dd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GSZI1wWlfE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6wnyhqIfvq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TatPrfUqV5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.845600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.845600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -6.93
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.92
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.92
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 80651 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec +16.4671 to +27.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec 16.4671 to 27.2945 deg
Loaded 5197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3489 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 80651 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 101 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.9 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.8 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.7 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uEuW8Hq1dd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=6242, bad_region=13891, passed=86324
Got 86324 stars (including 66886 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4848 stars left (next iteration limit 5332)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4848 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=1602 n_q2=612 n_q3=1848 n_q4=786 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4848 N_valid=4848 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.018 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.009 median_sep_arcsec=0.248 p95_sep_arcsec=1.203 n_q1=1602 n_q2=612 n_q3=1848 n_q4=786 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.GSZI1wWlfE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=5759, bad_region=13221, passed=80633
Got 80633 stars (including 62313 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80633 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5329)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1583 n_q2=633 n_q3=1821 n_q4=807 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4844 N_valid=4844 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.018 bias_dec_arcsec=0.005 median_sep_arcsec=0.280 p95_sep_arcsec=1.124 n_q1=1583 n_q2=633 n_q3=1821 n_q4=807 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.6wnyhqIfvq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=4907, bad_region=15432, passed=67404
Got 67404 stars (including 48831 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67404 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55692 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55692 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55692 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4867 stars left (next iteration limit 5352)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4867 robust_rms=8.133 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.921 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.921 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4867 robust_rms=0.480 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.740 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.740 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4867 robust_rms=0.399 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.578 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.578 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4867 robust_rms_before=1.102 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.415 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.399 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.643 worst_region_rms_after=0.578 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.176 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.578
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 1.102 -> 0.399 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits is a symbolic link
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.0 arcsec, 4867 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4715 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4715 pairs (4867 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4715 robust_rms=8.108 arcsec worst_region_rms=12.777 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.777 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4715 robust_rms=0.477 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.724 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.724 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4715 robust_rms=0.393 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.560 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.560 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4715 robust_rms_before=0.395 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.395 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.393 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.568 worst_region_rms_after=0.560 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.568 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.560
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 0.395 -> 0.393 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits is a symbolic link
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55692 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits N_match=4715 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.494 n_q1=1405 n_q2=1024 n_q3=1501 n_q4=785 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.190
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4715 N_valid=4715 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.618 bias_dec_arcsec=0.706 median_sep_arcsec=1.021 p95_sep_arcsec=1.842 n_q1=1405 n_q2=1024 n_q3=1501 n_q4=785 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.TatPrfUqV5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=4940, bad_region=15504, passed=67891
Got 67891 stars (including 49303 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67891 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56082 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56082 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4867 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56082 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4867 stars left (next iteration limit 5353)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4867 robust_rms=8.099 arcsec worst_region_rms=13.107 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.107 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4867 robust_rms=0.487 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.739 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.739 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4867 robust_rms=0.396 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.580 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.580 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4867 robust_rms_before=1.098 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.414 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.396 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.605 worst_region_rms_after=0.580 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.187 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.580
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.605 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.605 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.414 arcsec matched=4867
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits N_match=4867 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.527 n_q1=1463 n_q2=1050 n_q3=1535 n_q4=819 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4867 N_valid=4867 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.599 bias_dec_arcsec=0.686 median_sep_arcsec=1.023 p95_sep_arcsec=1.969 n_q1=1463 n_q2=1050 n_q3=1535 n_q4=819 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0426.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_022614_TTUQ2b1x1_3007076_GHT9IVbQ/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:25.07 +23:42:30.6: 15.69 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:38:02.51 +22:17:50.7: 15.43 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:11.64 +24:46:06.1: 15.05 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:43:41.27 +22:34:56.8: 15.68 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:06.94 +24:28:56.9: 15.35 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:45:41.23 +21:56:21.7: 14.89 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:30:41.43 +25:10:25.8: 15.01 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:39.55 +19:20:31.2: 15.38 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:50.47 +21:13:57.7: 14.79 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:56:13.40 +25:27:35.1: 15.17 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:25.07 +23:42:30.6: 15.32 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:45:41.23 +21:56:21.7: 15.16 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:38:02.51 +22:17:50.7: 15.16 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:06.94 +24:28:56.9: 15.49 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:11.64 +24:46:06.1: 15.49 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:50.47 +21:13:57.7: 14.92 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:25.07 +23:42:30.6: ref_mag=15.47 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1512 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:41.23 +21:56:21.7: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9570 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:02.51 +22:17:50.7: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1016 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:06.94 +24:28:56.9: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1388 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:50.47 +21:13:57.7: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.9906 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:56:13.40 +25:27:35.1: 14.93 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:39.55 +19:20:31.2: 15.32 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:30:41.43 +25:10:25.8: 14.90 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:11.64 +24:46:06.1: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9238 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:43:41.27 +22:34:56.8: 15.05 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:56:13.40 +25:27:35.1: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9656 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:41.43 +25:10:25.8: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=15.0819 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:41.27 +22:34:56.8: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9918 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:39.55 +19:20:31.2: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9843 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:22:22.58 +25:43:38.6: 14.92 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:37.45 +24:08:10.5: 15.09 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:38.52 +25:34:28.7: 14.59 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:31.71 +25:47:53.2: 14.62 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:19.76 +21:47:57.1: 14.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:43:38.84 +18:06:52.5: 13.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:36.83 +23:07:54.5: 14.86 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:14.07 +23:12:20.1: 15.07 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:24:56.15 +24:05:14.4: 14.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:38.52 +25:34:28.7: 14.52 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:38.52 +25:34:28.7: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5080 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:37.45 +24:08:10.5: 15.08 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:22:22.58 +25:43:38.6: 15.05 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:19.76 +21:47:57.1: 14.22 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:37.45 +24:08:10.5: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8051 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:36.83 +23:07:54.5: 14.77 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:31.71 +25:47:53.2: 14.56 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:43:38.84 +18:06:52.5: 13.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:22.58 +25:43:38.6: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9147 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:19.76 +21:47:57.1: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0706 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:36.83 +23:07:54.5: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8131 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:31.71 +25:47:53.2: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7368 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:14.07 +23:12:20.1: 15.14 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:38.84 +18:06:52.5: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0363 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:14.07 +23:12:20.1: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9793 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:24:56.15 +24:05:14.4: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:56.15 +24:05:14.4: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8726 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:22:52.07 +25:55:34.8: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:16.66 +24:34:44.7: 16.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:49:27.01 +23:15:08.6: 13.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:54.31 +26:03:37.9: 14.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:26.58 +21:52:54.1: 16.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:17.73 +24:00:00.5: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:22:52.07 +25:55:34.8: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:12.08 +18:28:57.8: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:51.20 +22:09:14.1: 14.72 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:16.66 +24:34:44.7: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:54.31 +26:03:37.9: 14.16 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:49:27.01 +23:15:08.6: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:54.31 +26:03:37.9: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1383 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:27.01 +23:15:08.6: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9796 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:26.75 +18:49:53.7: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:26.58 +21:52:54.1: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:17.73 +24:00:00.5: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:17.73 +24:00:00.5: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9790 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:12.08 +18:28:57.8: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:51.20 +22:09:14.1: 14.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:12.08 +18:28:57.8: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9746 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:51.20 +22:09:14.1: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4414 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:26.75 +18:49:53.7: 14.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:26.75 +18:49:53.7: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2411 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:53:38.07 +19:03:13.2: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:25.22 +17:51:22.2: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:23:55.28 +23:01:43.3: 14.23 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:45.31 +19:20:16.6: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:14.76 +23:46:24.7: 14.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:53:38.07 +19:03:13.2: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:53:38.07 +19:03:13.2: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2786 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:25.22 +17:51:22.2: 14.29 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:25.22 +17:51:22.2: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3081 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:23:55.28 +23:01:43.3: 14.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:55.28 +23:01:43.3: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4322 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:14.76 +23:46:24.7: 14.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:44.94 +20:22:29.0: 16.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:45.31 +19:20:16.6: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:14.76 +23:46:24.7: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4048 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:45.31 +19:20:16.6: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2166 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:48.36 +19:42:38.8: 14.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:44.94 +20:22:29.0: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:55.54 +23:59:00.6: 14.54 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:48.36 +19:42:38.8: 14.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:48.36 +19:42:38.8: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4007 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:21.13 +22:55:29.9: 14.75 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:55.54 +23:59:00.6: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:01.15 +19:10:16.6: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:30.43 +20:35:36.9: 15.25 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:55.54 +23:59:00.6: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4879 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:21.13 +22:55:29.9: 14.72 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:21.13 +22:55:29.9: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5320 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:53:35.96 +22:48:21.9: 14.62 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:30.43 +20:35:36.9: 15.30 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:30.43 +20:35:36.9: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7545 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:01.15 +19:10:16.6: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:49:38.33 +24:07:25.9: 15.30 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:01.15 +19:10:16.6: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5704 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:53:35.96 +22:48:21.9: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:53:35.96 +22:48:21.9: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7933 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:45.17 +23:20:18.7: 15.45 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:49:38.33 +24:07:25.9: 15.24 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:38.33 +24:07:25.9: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8274 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:23.89 +19:35:58.1: 15.80 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:45.17 +23:20:18.7: 15.16 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:58.05 +18:20:45.3: 15.38 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:42.52 +22:09:07.4: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:45.17 +23:20:18.7: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0381 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:23.89 +19:35:58.1: 15.48 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.62 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:23.89 +19:35:58.1: ref_mag=15.62 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.0469 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:00.77 +24:25:12.9: 15.18 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:32:09.15 +22:12:17.0: 15.33 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:58.05 +18:20:45.3: 15.19 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:42.52 +22:09:07.4: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:58.05 +18:20:45.3: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0491 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:00.77 +24:25:12.9: 15.27 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:00.77 +24:25:12.9: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9688 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:32:09.15 +22:12:17.0: 15.22 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:55.07 +21:36:58.5: 15.49 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:09.15 +22:12:17.0: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1358 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:30:47.96 +25:07:34.9: 15.59 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:51.17 +22:48:51.9: 15.92 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:30:47.96 +25:07:34.9: 15.78 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:55.07 +21:36:58.5: 15.04 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.66 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:47.96 +25:07:34.9: ref_mag=15.66 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.1999 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:55.07 +21:36:58.5: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0585 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:22:31.76 +20:46:27.7: 15.35 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:44.18 +22:40:16.7: 15.71 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:51.17 +22:48:51.9: 15.54 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.67 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:51.17 +22:48:51.9: ref_mag=15.67 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.0121 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:22:31.76 +20:46:27.7: 15.41 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:31.76 +20:46:27.7: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.2142 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:44.18 +22:40:16.7: 15.43 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:37:30.24 +22:03:39.4: 15.30 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.55 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:44.18 +22:40:16.7: ref_mag=15.55 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.2208 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:19.32 +20:35:25.6: 15.16 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:37:30.24 +22:03:39.4: 15.18 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:19.32 +20:35:25.6: 15.24 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:30.24 +22:03:39.4: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.1208 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:24:34.51 +24:09:23.5: 15.93 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:19.32 +20:35:25.6: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0721 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:16.72 +20:03:37.3: 15.61 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:26.86 +22:32:58.8: 15.24 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:24:34.51 +24:09:23.5: 15.48 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.65 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:34.51 +24:09:23.5: ref_mag=15.65 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.2663 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:16.72 +20:03:37.3: 15.81 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.68 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:16.72 +20:03:37.3: ref_mag=15.68 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.2188 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:23:25.68 +24:52:37.3: 16.08 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:26.86 +22:32:58.8: 15.47 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:08.62 +20:39:41.0: 15.27 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:26.86 +22:32:58.8: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=15.0912 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:23:25.68 +24:52:37.3: 15.91 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:08.62 +20:39:41.0: 14.98 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.99 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:25.68 +24:52:37.3: ref_mag=15.99 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=15.1974 delta=0.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:08.62 +20:39:41.0: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.1839 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:28:12.43 +21:18:47.2: 15.35 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:46.26 +25:55:31.2: 15.53 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:38:41.63 +20:07:06.1: 15.35 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:28:12.43 +21:18:47.2: 15.64 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:12.43 +21:18:47.2: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1848 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:46.26 +25:55:31.2: 15.73 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.61 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:46.26 +25:55:31.2: ref_mag=15.61 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.1431 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:32:01.62 +25:42:41.4: 15.67 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:23:10.70 +22:31:19.1: 15.46 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:38:41.63 +20:07:06.1: 15.18 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:41.63 +20:07:06.1: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1320 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:32:01.62 +25:42:41.4: 15.39 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:23:10.70 +22:31:19.1: 15.16 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:32:01.62 +25:42:41.4: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1329 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:10.70 +22:31:19.1: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1397 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:21:19.69 +20:54:23.8: 15.61 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:22:11.91 +21:07:54.5: 15.97 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:21:19.69 +20:54:23.8: 15.49 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:13.36 +22:52:34.6: 15.26 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.55 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:19.69 +20:54:23.8: ref_mag=15.55 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.2042 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:22:11.91 +21:07:54.5: 15.86 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.92 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:11.91 +21:07:54.5: ref_mag=15.92 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=15.2899 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:31.69 +19:07:24.6: 15.17 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:26:29.69 +21:16:54.4: 15.48 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:13.36 +22:52:34.6: 15.10 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:13.36 +22:52:34.6: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.2318 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:26:29.69 +21:16:54.4: 15.51 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:31.69 +19:07:24.6: 15.05 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.49 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:29.69 +21:16:54.4: ref_mag=15.49 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.2386 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:31.69 +19:07:24.6: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.1292 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:34:44.42 +19:52:23.7: 15.49 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:49:41.79 +22:01:30.2: 15.29 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:10.66 +20:43:49.6: 15.29 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:34:44.42 +19:52:23.7: 15.33 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:34:44.42 +19:52:23.7: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1771 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:49:41.79 +22:01:30.2: 15.37 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:41.79 +22:01:30.2: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.2039 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:09.66 +22:26:03.0: 15.16 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:10.66 +20:43:49.6: 15.54 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:10.66 +20:43:49.6: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1719 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:09.66 +22:26:03.0: 15.50 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:09.66 +22:26:03.0: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.1942 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:12.06 +25:58:26.3: 14.33 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:12.06 +25:58:26.3: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:12.06 +25:58:26.3: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5414 delta=0.80 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102955.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106017.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106760.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out109390.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112178.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 35s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100440_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100440_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100444_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100444_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100445_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100445_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100448_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100448_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100449_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100449_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100451_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100451_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100452_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100452_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100454_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100454_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100456_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100456_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100458_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100458_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100459_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100459_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100461_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100461_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100466_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100466_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100467_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100467_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100470_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100470_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100471_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100471_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100480_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100480_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100482_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100482_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100484_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100484_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:21.90 +25:28:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100492_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100492_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:44.32 +25:22:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100493_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100493_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100496_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100496_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.80 +24:18:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100981_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 100981_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:25.27 +17:54:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101191_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 101191_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:23.71 +19:10:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102196_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 102196_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:45.28 +19:28:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102955_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
Preparing report for the candidate 102955_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103821_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 103821_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:24.70 +22:56:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104092_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 104092_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:45.23 +19:58:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104483_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 104483_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:07.85 +21:31:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104836_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 104836_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:30.10 +21:45:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104889_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 104889_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:27.18 +19:11:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105216_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 105216_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:16.64 +21:52:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105305_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 105305_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:25.49 +18:42:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106017_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
Preparing report for the candidate 106017_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106283_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 106283_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106545_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 106545_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106690_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 106690_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:57.96 +21:03:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106760_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
Preparing report for the candidate 106760_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106769_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 106769_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106876_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 106876_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:28.46 +23:36:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106947_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 106947_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:58.91 +20:19:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107212_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 107212_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107746_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 107746_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107754_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 107754_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:25.72 +19:11:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107784_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 107784_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108169_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 108169_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:26.62 +23:36:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108170_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 108170_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:40.55 +21:44:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108197_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 108197_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108457_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 108457_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108517_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 108517_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108717_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 108717_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108839_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 108839_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109004_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 109004_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:28.61 +20:33:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109014_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 109014_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:13.88 +23:20:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109390_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
Preparing report for the candidate 109390_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109403_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 109403_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109721_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 109721_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110203_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 110203_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:49.11 +22:53:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110260_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 110260_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110287_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 110287_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110374_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 110374_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110946_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 110946_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111324_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 111324_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111349_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 111349_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111613_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 111613_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112058_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 112058_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112178_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
Preparing report for the candidate 112178_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112289_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 112289_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112449_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 112449_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112450_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 112450_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112474_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 112474_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112501_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 112501_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112569_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 112569_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112594_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 112594_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112609_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 112609_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112619_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 112619_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112672_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 112672_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112728_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 112728_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112737_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 112737_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112744_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 112744_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112873_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 112873_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112929_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 112929_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112953_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 112953_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112962_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 112962_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112969_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 112969_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112974_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 112974_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112983_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 112983_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113007_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 113007_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113129_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 113129_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113130_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 113130_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113188_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 113188_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113288_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 113288_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113435_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 113435_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113481_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 113481_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113482_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 113482_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68386_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 68386_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07914_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 07914_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:28.59 +26:10:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99413_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 99413_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20082_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 20082_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:55.42 +24:28:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73403_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 73403_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:44.45 +18:37:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08727_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427
The candidate 08727_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0427 did not pass the final checks
