This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 10.64 08:22:02.73 -22:25:55.5
243.40501 8.21155 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 9.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V0639 Pup
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.500 V 13.000 V 2452248.70000 800.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:22:02.73 -22:25:55.5: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:22:02.73 -22:25:55.5: 11.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0639 Pup,2461347.8332,10.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0639 Pup 20261103.3332 10.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 13.21 07:47:01.18 -21:40:54.9
238.44786 1.72743 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 9.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" GDS_J0747011-214055
Type: VAR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.810 r Y 0.540 r M9
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:47:01.18 -21:40:54.9: 14.80 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:47:01.18 -21:40:54.9: 14.68 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.17
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GDS_J0747011-214055,2461347.8332,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GDS_J0747011-214055 20261103.3332 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 11.13 08:26:14.96 -19:03:47.0
241.12622 10.90732 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" NSVS J0826152-190349
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.719 R1 Y 0.291 R1 112.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:26:14.96 -19:03:47.0: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:26:14.96 -19:03:47.0: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0826152-190349,2461347.8332,11.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0826152-190349 20261103.3332 11.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 12.47 07:55:32.87 -21:32:00.4
239.33017 3.50911 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 9.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" GDS_J0755329-213202
Type: VAR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.310 r Y 0.640 r
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:55:32.87 -21:32:00.4: 13.61 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:55:32.87 -21:32:00.4: 13.47 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GDS_J0755329-213202,2461347.8332,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GDS_J0755329-213202 20261103.3332 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 12.19 08:05:59.13 -22:43:28.7
241.61716 4.94428 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J080559.15-224331.2
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.810 V 14.370 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:05:59.13 -22:43:28.7: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:05:59.13 -22:43:28.7: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J080559.15-224331.2,2461347.8332,12.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J080559.15-224331.2 20261103.3332 12.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 12.29 08:19:56.13 -18:29:53.7
239.80801 9.97367 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 9.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J081956.14-182953.9
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.500 V 14.320 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:19:56.13 -18:29:53.7: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:19:56.13 -18:29:53.7: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J081956.14-182953.9,2461347.8332,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J081956.14-182953.9 20261103.3332 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 12.13 08:00:48.44 -22:12:05.4
240.53770 4.20467 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 9.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J080048.33-221205.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.480 V 13.890 V 2457415.90000 113.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:00:48.44 -22:12:05.4: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:00:48.44 -22:12:05.4: 12.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J080048.33-221205.3,2461347.8332,12.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J080048.33-221205.3 20261103.3332 12.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 11.93 08:12:04.55 -15:54:12.0
236.56263 9.78982 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 9.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J081204.50-155411.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.860 V 15.000 V 2457122.80000 259.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:12:04.55 -15:54:12.0: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:12:04.55 -15:54:12.0: 13.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J081204.50-155411.8,2461347.8332,11.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J081204.50-155411.8 20261103.3332 11.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 12.03 07:53:09.47 -18:52:53.3
236.75945 4.38669 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J075309.41-185253.5
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.020 V 13.540 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:53:09.47 -18:52:53.3: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:53:09.47 -18:52:53.3: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J075309.41-185253.5,2461347.8332,12.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J075309.41-185253.5 20261103.3332 12.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 11.99 07:57:41.74 -15:00:04.9
233.96102 7.29944 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J075741.78-150006.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.010 V 14.200 V 2457285.10000 281.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:57:41.74 -15:00:04.9: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:57:41.74 -15:00:04.9: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J075741.78-150006.3,2461347.8332,11.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J075741.78-150006.3 20261103.3332 11.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 11.71 07:38:05.10 -18:55:58.9
235.02077 1.27289 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" GDS_J0738049-185558
Type: VAR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.400 r Y 0.530 r M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:38:05.10 -18:55:58.9: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:38:05.10 -18:55:58.9: 12.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GDS_J0738049-185558,2461347.8332,11.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GDS_J0738049-185558 20261103.3332 11.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 11.59 08:04:39.29 -22:19:25.7
241.11247 4.89684 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 9.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ASASSN-V J080439.11-221928.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.190 V 13.880 V 2457095.80000 66.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:04:39.29 -22:19:25.7: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:04:39.29 -22:19:25.7: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J080439.11-221928.8,2461347.8332,11.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J080439.11-221928.8 20261103.3332 11.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 11.73 08:06:50.41 -20:59:28.1
240.24866 6.03457 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 9.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J080650.30-205929.9
Type: SRS
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.910 V 13.110 V 2458196.70600 22.884000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:06:50.41 -20:59:28.1: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:06:50.41 -20:59:28.1: 12.66 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J080650.30-205929.9,2461347.8332,11.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J080650.30-205929.9 20261103.3332 11.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 11.37 08:08:08.39 -21:03:45.8
240.47208 6.25310 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 8.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ASAS J080809-2103.7
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.091 Ic Y 0.536 Ic 2452834.30000 147.700000000000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:08:08.39 -21:03:45.8: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:08:08.39 -21:03:45.8: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J080809-2103.7,2461347.8332,11.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J080809-2103.7 20261103.3332 11.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 13.10 07:54:42.35 -18:17:51.2
236.44341 5.00012 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 9.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J075442.32-181750.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.430 V 15.120 V 2458498.26110 148.075804200000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:54:42.35 -18:17:51.2: 14.42 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:54:42.35 -18:17:51.2: 14.14 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J075442.32-181750.7,2461347.8332,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J075442.32-181750.7 20261103.3332 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 11.39 07:50:35.32 -18:31:24.3
236.14044 4.04432 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 9.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J075035-1831.4
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.590 Ic Y 0.447 Ic 2452713.20000 138.100000000000 M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:50:35.32 -18:31:24.3: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:50:35.32 -18:31:24.3: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J075035-1831.4,2461347.8332,11.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J075035-1831.4 20261103.3332 11.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 12.37 08:02:13.12 -19:08:58.7
238.09975 6.08284 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 9.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J080213.22-190855.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.460 g Y 0.510 g 2458467.63400 599.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:02:13.12 -19:08:58.7: 13.53 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:02:13.12 -19:08:58.7: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J080213.22-190855.9,2461347.8332,12.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J080213.22-190855.9 20261103.3332 12.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 12.04 07:51:48.24 -21:20:39.9
238.72043 2.85790 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 9.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" GDS_J0751482-212040
Type: VAR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.400 r Y 0.780 r M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:51:48.24 -21:20:39.9: 13.60 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:51:48.24 -21:20:39.9: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GDS_J0751482-212040,2461347.8332,12.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GDS_J0751482-212040 20261103.3332 12.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 12.30 08:19:15.41 -15:58:31.8
237.56435 11.20931 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 9.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J081915.41-155831.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.380 g Y 0.830 g 2458852.75400 183.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:19:15.41 -15:58:31.8: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:19:15.41 -15:58:31.8: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J081915.41-155831.1,2461347.8332,12.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J081915.41-155831.1 20261103.3332 12.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 12.52 08:18:02.19 -14:23:35.6
236.04114 11.81142 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 9" NSVS J0818016-142339
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.560 R1 Y 0.375 R1 130.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:18:02.19 -14:23:35.6: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:18:02.19 -14:23:35.6: 13.48 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0818016-142339,2461347.8332,12.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0818016-142339 20261103.3332 12.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 12.36 07:55:19.83 -18:11:18.3
236.42540 5.18339 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 9.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J075519.74-181118.9
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.660 V 14.130 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:55:19.83 -18:11:18.3: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:55:19.83 -18:11:18.3: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J075519.74-181118.9,2461347.8332,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J075519.74-181118.9 20261103.3332 12.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 10.14 08:17:53.46 -16:12:42.6
237.58671 10.80557 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSV 3992
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.330 V Y 0.660 V 2452563.20000 119.700000000000 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:17:53.46 -16:12:42.6: 11.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:17:53.46 -16:12:42.6: 11.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.10 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 3992,2461347.8332,10.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 3992 20261103.3332 10.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 9.64 08:02:03.19 -18:46:59.4
237.76482 6.24079 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 9.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J080203-1847.0
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.850 V Y 0.530 V 2452725.60000 210.000000000000 M6
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:02:03.19 -18:46:59.4: 10.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:02:03.19 -18:46:59.4: 10.44 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.60 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J080203-1847.0,2461347.8332,9.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J080203-1847.0 20261103.3332 9.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3332 2461347.8332 13.02 08:02:01.19 -17:43:43.2
236.85470 6.78335 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 9.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J080201.14-174341.8
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.560 V 15.270 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:02:01.19 -17:43:43.2: 14.17 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:02:01.19 -17:43:43.2: 13.78 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J080201.14-174341.8,2461347.8332,13.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J080201.14-174341.8 20261103.3332 13.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.84486016 21.01.2026 08:16:25.918 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
First image: 2461061.84486016 21.01.2026 08:16:25.918 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
Last image: 2461347.83350183 03.11.2026 08:00:04.558 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 34
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.87
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25885
Objects passed selection criteria: 25849
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 21191.8
Average stars matched: 20737 (97.8541 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 254124 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 02:05:29 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.84486016 21.01.2026 08:16:25.918 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
First image: 2461061.84486016 21.01.2026 08:16:25.918 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
Last image: 2461347.83350183 03.11.2026 08:00:04.558 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 164
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 58 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 181744
Objects passed selection criteria: 181316
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 142747
Average stars matched: 136977 (95.9582 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 580780 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 02:07:27 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.83287568
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:01.388 -18:00:01.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
Image size: 945.9'x627.4' 15.8(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.93"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:01.323 -18:00:55.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:01.388 -18:00:01.31
Second-epoch image center 08:00:01.323 -18:00:55.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0150 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
Image size: 945.8'x627.4' 15.8(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.93"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:04.117 -18:00:13.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:01.388 -18:00:01.31
Second-epoch image center 08:00:04.117 -18:00:13.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0113 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:01.323 -18:00:55.16
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:04.117 -18:00:13.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01599 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O8D8QPS3gC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vX9axwXy04
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QWH4zF4HHv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rcmSSifHMv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits and wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits and wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits and wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits) and catalog (wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28414 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 111.6371 to 128.6618 deg, Dec -23.3378 to -12.4232 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 111.6371 to 128.6618 deg, Dec -23.3378 to -12.4232 deg
Loaded 27000 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 18080 out of 19664 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 19664 out of 28414 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.840900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.840900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.87
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28414 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 111.6371 to 128.6618 deg, Dec -23.3378 to -12.4232 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 111.6371 to 128.6618 deg, Dec -23.3378 to -12.4232 deg
Loaded 27000 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 18080 out of 19664 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 19664 out of 28414 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 26657 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 111.6557 to 128.6148 deg, Dec -23.3082 to -12.5341 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 111.6557 to 128.6148 deg, Dec -23.3082 to -12.5341 deg
Loaded 26605 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 17495 out of 18666 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18666 out of 26657 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 25 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
2.5 pix Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
4.0 pix fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
4.0 pix fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
14.9 mag. Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.O8D8QPS3gC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits' -> 'wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2860, bad_region=0, passed=28414
Got 28414 stars (including 25530 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28414 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5377)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=935 n_q2=1333 n_q3=1119 n_q4=1503 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4890 N_valid=4890 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.001 bias_dec_arcsec=0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.254 p95_sep_arcsec=1.963 n_q1=935 n_q2=1333 n_q3=1119 n_q4=1503 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits -region wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vX9axwXy04 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2191, bad_region=1, passed=26657
Got 26657 stars (including 24443 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26657 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26657 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26657 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26657 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.663 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.824 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.893 n_q1=930 n_q2=1379 n_q3=1092 n_q4=1482 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.347
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4883 N_valid=4883 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.063 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.457 p95_sep_arcsec=4.722 n_q1=930 n_q2=1379 n_q3=1092 n_q4=1482 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits -region wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QWH4zF4HHv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=785, bad_region=1, passed=15067
Got 15067 stars (including 14273 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15067 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013137 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010510 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5340)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=7.375 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.953 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.560 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.949 arcsec worst_region_rms=2.131 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.232 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4855 robust_rms=0.731 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.991 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.991 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4855 robust_rms_before=2.641 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.710 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.731 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.110 worst_region_rms_after=0.991 outer_annulus_rms_before=3.527 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.991
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.sip_refit.D3weI4/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.sip_refit.D3weI4/candidate.fits
Image size: 946.4'x627.2' 15.8(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.93"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:01.454 -18:00:57.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 15067 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.sip_refit.D3weI4/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_280783.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.sip_refit.D3weI4/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.vRsvna' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_280783.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 2.641 -> 0.731 arcsec)
SIP_REFIT: re-matching the catalog with the refit solution (cycle 1, search radius 3.7 arcsec, 4855 pairs from the previous matching)
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4565 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
SIP_REFIT: re-match found 4565 pairs (4855 from the previous matching)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4565 robust_rms=6.856 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.164 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=11.840 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4565 robust_rms=0.896 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.785 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.084 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4565 robust_rms=0.706 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.947 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.947 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4565 robust_rms_before=0.706 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.706 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.706 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.949 worst_region_rms_after=0.947 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.949 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.947
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.sip_refit.EvGZrJ/candidate.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.sip_refit.EvGZrJ/candidate.fits
Image size: 946.4'x627.2' 15.8(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.93"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:01.449 -18:00:56.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 15067 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.sip_refit.EvGZrJ/candidate.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction_281625.cat.log'
'wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.sip_refit.EvGZrJ/candidate.wcscat.xy2sky.fSpjPD' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction_281625.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.706 -> 0.706 arcsec)
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4565 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4565 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits N_match=4565 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.711 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.829 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.947 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.695 n_q1=1451 n_q2=691 n_q3=1590 n_q4=833 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.333
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4565 N_valid=4565 bias_ra_arcsec=0.013 bias_dec_arcsec=0.012 median_sep_arcsec=0.564 p95_sep_arcsec=1.736 n_q1=1451 n_q2=691 n_q3=1590 n_q4=833 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits -region wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.rcmSSifHMv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=791, bad_region=0, passed=15186
Got 15186 stars (including 14383 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15186 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013136 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010509 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4856 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4849 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 4849 stars left (next iteration limit 5341)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4849 robust_rms=7.688 arcsec worst_region_rms=15.962 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.002 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4849 robust_rms=0.873 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.715 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.201 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4849 robust_rms=0.717 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.997 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.997 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4849 robust_rms_before=2.477 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.705 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.717 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.057 worst_region_rms_after=0.997 outer_annulus_rms_before=3.330 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.997
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 1.057 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits worst_region_rms_kept=1.057 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.705 arcsec matched=4849
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits N_match=4849 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.682 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.793 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.931 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.638 n_q1=1562 n_q2=757 n_q3=1661 n_q4=869 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.366
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4849 N_valid=4849 bias_ra_arcsec=1.019 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.424 median_sep_arcsec=2.075 p95_sep_arcsec=7.418 n_q1=1562 n_q2=757 n_q3=1661 n_q4=869 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits -region wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits sigma_overall=0.382 worst_q_ratio=1.131
ref2=Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits sigma_overall=0.663 worst_q_ratio=1.347
new1=fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits sigma_overall=0.711 worst_q_ratio=1.333
new2=fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits sigma_overall=0.682 worst_q_ratio=1.366
reference average sigma_overall=0.5225 worst_q_ratio=1.239
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047_astrometric_residuals.png (4883 matched stars from wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.61 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359_astrometric_residuals.png (4565 matched stars from wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360_astrometric_residuals.png (4849 matched stars from wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.64 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Pup-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:29:43.32 -22:32:43.2: 9.83 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:48:22.31 -20:58:32.1: 11.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:38:45.48 -22:07:07.9: 12.16 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:29:43.32 -22:32:43.2: 9.77 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:48:22.31 -20:58:32.1: 11.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.80 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:29:43.32 -22:32:43.2: ref_mag=9.80 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.7702 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:48:22.31 -20:58:32.1: ref_mag=11.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0381 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:22:02.73 -22:25:55.5: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:38:45.48 -22:07:07.9: 11.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:45.48 -22:07:07.9: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4346 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:22:02.73 -22:25:55.5: 11.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:22:02.73 -22:25:55.5: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.6452 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23415.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31237_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 31237_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:30.26 -13:45:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31238_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 31238_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31284_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 31284_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31327_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 31327_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31350_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 31350_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31360_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 31360_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:43.06 -15:19:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31431_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 31431_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31444_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 31444_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:50.06 -16:36:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31472_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 31472_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31511_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 31511_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31557_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 31557_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31559_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 31559_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31561_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 31561_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31568_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 31568_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31645_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 31645_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31668_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 31668_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:50.12 -18:58:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31688_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 31688_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31690_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 31690_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31695_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 31695_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31718_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 31718_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20504_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 20504_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:23.21 -20:45:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22107_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 22107_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:32.75 -21:11:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21239_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 21239_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:39.43 -20:58:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23415_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 23415_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23951_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 23951_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:42.98 -22:10:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Pup-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
08:22:02.73 -22:25:55.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:01.388 -18:00:01.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
Image size: 946.4'x627.2' 15.8(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.93"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:01.449 -18:00:56.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:01.388 -18:00:01.31
Second-epoch image center 08:00:01.449 -18:00:56.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0155 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
Image size: 945.8'x627.4' 15.8(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.93"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:04.117 -18:00:13.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:01.388 -18:00:01.31
Second-epoch image center 08:00:04.117 -18:00:13.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0113 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:01.449 -18:00:56.93
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:04.117 -18:00:13.60
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01602 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w6E0Y8K1cq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J4LBluXx1T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Qls8RNDOPY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KSCTIUrXAA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits and wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits and wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits and wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits) and catalog (wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 208194 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 111.6275 to 128.6690 deg, Dec -23.3379 to -12.3964 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 111.6275 to 128.6690 deg, Dec -23.3379 to -12.3964 deg
Loaded 27096 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15559 out of 22785 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 22785 out of 208194 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.677300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.677300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 208194 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 111.6275 to 128.6690 deg, Dec -23.3379 to -12.3964 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 111.6275 to 128.6690 deg, Dec -23.3379 to -12.3964 deg
Loaded 27096 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 15559 out of 22785 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 22785 out of 208194 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 195863 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 111.6381 to 128.6148 deg, Dec -23.3103 to -12.4932 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 111.6381 to 128.6148 deg, Dec -23.3103 to -12.4932 deg
Loaded 26734 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 16429 out of 22112 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 22112 out of 195863 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 135 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
2.3 pix Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
3.9 pix fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
3.9 pix fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
15.1 mag. Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.w6E0Y8K1cq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits' -> 'wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=32716, bad_region=8, passed=208162
Got 208162 stars (including 175148 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 208162 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 390 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4908 stars left (next iteration limit 5398)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits N_match=4908 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=992 n_q2=1292 n_q3=1166 n_q4=1458 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4908 N_valid=4908 bias_ra_arcsec=0.012 bias_dec_arcsec=0.015 median_sep_arcsec=0.254 p95_sep_arcsec=1.889 n_q1=992 n_q2=1292 n_q3=1166 n_q4=1458 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits -region wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.J4LBluXx1T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=80, blended=27260, bad_region=1, passed=195783
Got 195783 stars (including 168316 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 195783 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 195783 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 195783 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 195783 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.636 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.738 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.832 n_q1=958 n_q2=1342 n_q3=1114 n_q4=1485 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.308
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4899 N_valid=4899 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.078 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.004 median_sep_arcsec=0.448 p95_sep_arcsec=4.311 n_q1=958 n_q2=1342 n_q3=1114 n_q4=1485 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits -region wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Qls8RNDOPY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=8611, bad_region=31, passed=85570
Got 85570 stars (including 76860 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 85570 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 946.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 946.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013144 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010516 (37.9 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=7.421 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.265 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=12.463 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.943 arcsec worst_region_rms=2.188 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.189 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.733 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.965 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.965 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=0.732 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.718 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.733 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.979 worst_region_rms_after=0.965 outer_annulus_rms_before=0.979 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.965
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.979 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.979 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.718 arcsec matched=4876
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.696 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.815 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.942 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.711 n_q1=1566 n_q2=747 n_q3=1650 n_q4=913 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.353
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4876 N_valid=4876 bias_ra_arcsec=0.016 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.001 median_sep_arcsec=0.595 p95_sep_arcsec=4.146 n_q1=1566 n_q2=747 n_q3=1650 n_q4=913 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits -region wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KSCTIUrXAA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=8568, bad_region=30, passed=85464
Got 85464 stars (including 76795 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 85464 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013136 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010509 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.4 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4869 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Excluding outliers - 4869 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=7.966 arcsec worst_region_rms=16.161 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=13.365 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.912 arcsec worst_region_rms=1.731 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=1.218 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4869 robust_rms=0.722 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.991 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.991 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4869 robust_rms_before=2.471 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.721 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.722 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=1.040 worst_region_rms_after=0.991 outer_annulus_rms_before=3.320 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.991
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 1.040 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits worst_region_rms_kept=1.040 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.721 arcsec matched=4869
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits N_match=4869 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.690 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.783 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.959 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.646 n_q1=1564 n_q2=750 n_q3=1653 n_q4=902 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.390
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4869 N_valid=4869 bias_ra_arcsec=1.018 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.444 median_sep_arcsec=2.073 p95_sep_arcsec=7.248 n_q1=1564 n_q2=750 n_q3=1653 n_q4=902 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits -region wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-59-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0359.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_020101_TTUQ1b1x1_50733_1JhGnfd6/wcs_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Pup-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:27:35.03 -16:01:40.0: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:00:54.60 -19:08:07.9: 12.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:51:16.12 -15:33:17.0: 13.28 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:14:39.42 -13:10:56.5: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:34:54.40 -18:47:18.4: 13.28 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:35:49.59 -14:05:31.9: 13.48 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:35:37.95 -13:25:54.5: 13.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:58:41.76 -18:31:19.7: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:33:36.08 -14:03:50.1: 13.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:31:00.80 -14:35:03.5: 13.22 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:35:49.59 -14:05:31.9: 13.58 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:27:35.03 -16:01:40.0: 12.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:14:39.42 -13:10:56.5: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:35:37.95 -13:25:54.5: 13.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:00:54.60 -19:08:07.9: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:34:54.40 -18:47:18.4: 13.21 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:51:16.12 -15:33:17.0: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:49.59 -14:05:31.9: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6778 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:27:35.03 -16:01:40.0: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5755 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:14:39.42 -13:10:56.5: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9847 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:37.95 -13:25:54.5: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3160 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:54.40 -18:47:18.4: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3090 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:00:54.60 -19:08:07.9: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4935 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:51:16.12 -15:33:17.0: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1076 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:58:41.76 -18:31:19.7: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:33:36.08 -14:03:50.1: 13.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:58:41.76 -18:31:19.7: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6683 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:36.08 -14:03:50.1: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1710 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:31:00.80 -14:35:03.5: 13.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:00.80 -14:35:03.5: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0531 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:51:17.33 -21:57:29.9: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:47:56.52 -22:42:58.1: 13.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:01:38.67 -20:05:57.7: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:57:45.86 -20:21:11.2: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:30:04.61 -16:38:09.4: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:33:12.24 -20:43:06.8: 12.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:35:14.41 -14:42:53.4: 12.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:51:17.33 -21:57:29.9: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:51:17.33 -21:57:29.9: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3717 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:47:56.52 -22:42:58.1: 13.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:57:45.86 -20:21:11.2: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:47:56.52 -22:42:58.1: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.3871 delta=0.81 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:57:45.86 -20:21:11.2: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3071 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:01:38.67 -20:05:57.7: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:30:04.61 -16:38:09.4: 12.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:01:38.67 -20:05:57.7: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4295 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:04.61 -16:38:09.4: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9068 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:42:37.33 -12:48:37.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:33:12.24 -20:43:06.8: 12.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:12.24 -20:43:06.8: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6276 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:35:14.41 -14:42:53.4: 12.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:14.41 -14:42:53.4: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1250 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:42:37.33 -12:48:37.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:42:37.33 -12:48:37.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:45:16.10 -12:48:03.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:36:24.84 -16:15:44.5: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:12:59.57 -13:31:37.3: 12.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:27:50.04 -19:40:35.6: 12.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:36:24.84 -16:15:44.5: 12.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:12:59.57 -13:31:37.3: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:45:16.10 -12:48:03.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:45:16.10 -12:48:03.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:36:24.84 -16:15:44.5: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3627 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:12:59.57 -13:31:37.3: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0931 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:32:33.76 -20:39:05.4: 12.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:37:28.61 -15:41:17.4: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:27:50.04 -19:40:35.6: 13.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:50.04 -19:40:35.6: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.4752 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:36:41.95 -12:51:39.8: 12.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:32:33.76 -20:39:05.4: 12.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:32:33.76 -20:39:05.4: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3749 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:37:28.61 -15:41:17.4: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:37:28.61 -15:41:17.4: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7302 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:39:36.93 -13:51:59.1: 13.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:07:09.95 -17:21:46.6: 12.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:32:29.66 -13:03:26.7: 12.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:36:41.95 -12:51:39.8: 13.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:36:41.95 -12:51:39.8: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0167 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:39:36.93 -13:51:59.1: 13.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:40:18.58 -12:48:56.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:07:09.95 -17:21:46.6: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:39:36.93 -13:51:59.1: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9097 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:07:09.95 -17:21:46.6: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5364 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:32:29.66 -13:03:26.7: 13.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:32:29.66 -13:03:26.7: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2208 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:29:04.84 -18:29:25.1: 13.25 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:04:21.34 -19:46:24.4: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:40:18.58 -12:48:56.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:18.58 -12:48:56.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:01:06.03 -14:29:44.2: 13.25 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:29:04.84 -18:29:25.1: 13.43 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:47:01.18 -21:40:54.9: 14.80 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:04.84 -18:29:25.1: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9701 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:04:21.34 -19:46:24.4: 12.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:04:21.34 -19:46:24.4: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5409 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:01:06.03 -14:29:44.2: 13.19 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:01:06.03 -14:29:44.2: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1229 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:27:09.45 -22:11:43.1: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:28:30.73 -20:57:51.8: 13.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:47:01.18 -21:40:54.9: 14.68 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:47:01.18 -21:40:54.9: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.1814 delta=1.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:55:32.87 -21:32:00.4: 13.61 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:26:14.96 -19:03:47.0: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:16:58.88 -22:39:45.6: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:28:30.73 -20:57:51.8: 13.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:27:09.45 -22:11:43.1: 12.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:30.73 -20:57:51.8: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7687 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:27:09.45 -22:11:43.1: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1715 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:55:32.87 -21:32:00.4: 13.47 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:55:32.87 -21:32:00.4: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.4706 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:26:14.96 -19:03:47.0: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:26:14.96 -19:03:47.0: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1294 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:16:58.88 -22:39:45.6: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:16:58.88 -22:39:45.6: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8647 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:18:58.47 -22:44:49.6: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:05:59.13 -22:43:28.7: 13.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:19:56.13 -18:29:53.7: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:22:25.29 -22:13:01.9: 11.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:18:58.47 -22:44:49.6: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:18:58.47 -22:44:49.6: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8119 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:19:56.13 -18:29:53.7: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:19:56.13 -18:29:53.7: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.2749 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:05:59.13 -22:43:28.7: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:05:59.13 -22:43:28.7: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1680 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:22:25.29 -22:13:01.9: 11.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:22:25.29 -22:13:01.9: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1442 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:21:36.51 -22:26:31.7: 12.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:00:48.44 -22:12:05.4: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:12:04.55 -15:54:12.0: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:21:36.51 -22:26:31.7: 12.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:00:48.44 -22:12:05.4: 12.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:21:36.51 -22:26:31.7: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6174 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:00:48.44 -22:12:05.4: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1304 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:12:04.55 -15:54:12.0: 13.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:12:04.55 -15:54:12.0: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.9125 delta=1.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:53:09.47 -18:52:53.3: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:53:09.47 -18:52:53.3: 12.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:53:09.47 -18:52:53.3: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0229 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:29:02.70 -20:42:14.2: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:29:02.70 -20:42:14.2: 11.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:29:02.70 -20:42:14.2: ref_mag=11.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8127 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:26:01.48 -22:35:29.7: 9.88 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:26:01.48 -22:35:29.7: 9.90 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.89 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:26:01.48 -22:35:29.7: ref_mag=9.89 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3663 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:25:52.55 -20:26:29.8: 11.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:25:52.55 -20:26:29.8: 11.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:25:52.55 -20:26:29.8: ref_mag=11.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5053 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:36:57.88 -19:25:08.6: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:36:57.88 -19:25:08.6: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:36:57.88 -19:25:08.6: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0912 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:29:39.15 -20:33:11.2: 12.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:29:39.15 -20:33:11.2: 13.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:29:39.15 -20:33:11.2: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.6129 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:30:48.54 -21:36:36.4: 12.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:30:48.54 -21:36:36.4: 13.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:48.54 -21:36:36.4: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8236 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:32:03.72 -14:19:29.9: 13.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:32:03.72 -14:19:29.9: 13.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:32:03.72 -14:19:29.9: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9541 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:30:13.66 -20:19:37.1: 13.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:30:13.66 -20:19:37.1: 13.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:13.66 -20:19:37.1: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0028 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:17:08.22 -22:56:00.4: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:17:08.22 -22:56:00.4: 12.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:17:08.22 -22:56:00.4: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3962 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:57:41.74 -15:00:04.9: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:57:41.74 -15:00:04.9: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:57:41.74 -15:00:04.9: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9940 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:38:05.10 -18:55:58.9: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:26:55.64 -20:25:28.0: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:04:39.29 -22:19:25.7: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:38:05.10 -18:55:58.9: 12.63 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:31:56.42 -19:15:11.5: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:26:55.64 -20:25:28.0: 11.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:38:05.10 -18:55:58.9: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7064 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:26:55.64 -20:25:28.0: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8367 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:06:50.41 -20:59:28.1: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:04:39.29 -22:19:25.7: 12.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:04:39.29 -22:19:25.7: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.5893 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:31:56.42 -19:15:11.5: 12.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:31:56.42 -19:15:11.5: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9390 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:06:50.41 -20:59:28.1: 12.66 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:06:50.41 -20:59:28.1: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7291 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:08:08.39 -21:03:45.8: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:08:08.39 -21:03:45.8: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:08:08.39 -21:03:45.8: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3644 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:57:37.58 -22:15:35.8: 12.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:57:37.58 -22:15:35.8: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:54:42.35 -18:17:51.2: 14.42 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:57:37.58 -22:15:35.8: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4989 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:54:42.35 -18:17:51.2: 14.14 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:54:42.35 -18:17:51.2: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.0356 delta=1.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:50:35.32 -18:31:24.3: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:50:35.32 -18:31:24.3: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:50:35.32 -18:31:24.3: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3908 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:02:13.12 -19:08:58.7: 13.53 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:51:48.24 -21:20:39.9: 13.60 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:02:13.12 -19:08:58.7: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:02:13.12 -19:08:58.7: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3680 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:51:48.24 -21:20:39.9: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:51:48.24 -21:20:39.9: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.0430 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:19:15.41 -15:58:31.8: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:18:02.19 -14:23:35.6: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:19:15.41 -15:58:31.8: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:19:15.41 -15:58:31.8: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.2997 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:18:02.19 -14:23:35.6: 13.48 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:18:02.19 -14:23:35.6: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.5206 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 07:55:19.83 -18:11:18.3: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:55:19.83 -18:11:18.3: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:17:53.46 -16:12:42.6: 11.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:55:19.83 -18:11:18.3: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3557 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:17:53.46 -16:12:42.6: 11.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:17:53.46 -16:12:42.6: ref_mag=11.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.1378 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:02:03.19 -18:46:59.4: 10.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:02:03.19 -18:46:59.4: 10.44 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.60 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:24:33.65 -22:46:32.3: 10.57 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:02:03.19 -18:46:59.4: ref_mag=10.60 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.6420 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-21_02-16-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0384.fits at 08:02:01.19 -17:43:43.2: 14.17 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:24:33.65 -22:46:32.3: 10.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.58 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:24:33.65 -22:46:32.3: ref_mag=10.58 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8175 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-15_21-46-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:02:01.19 -17:43:43.2: 13.78 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:02:01.19 -17:43:43.2: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.9857 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103379.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out105128.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out110487.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out114249.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117457.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117688.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out118146.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out123832.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out128005.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159810.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out168028.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out170852.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out185564.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out189539.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out192917.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195738.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out238311.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32495.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out41003.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out60485.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out63244.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out68868.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94759.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 55s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 13s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235220_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235220_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235227_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235227_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235236_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235236_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235237_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235237_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235238_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235238_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235246_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235246_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235256_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235256_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235257_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235257_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235258_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235258_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235260_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235260_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:32.53 -14:52:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235269_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235269_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235274_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235274_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235275_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235275_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235276_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235276_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235280_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235280_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235281_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235281_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235282_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235282_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:12:47.05 -13:27:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235283_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235283_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235293_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235293_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235294_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235294_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235297_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235297_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235299_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235299_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:27.10 -20:28:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235302_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235302_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:20:13.95 -21:15:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235305_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235305_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235486_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235486_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:43.06 -15:19:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235573_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235573_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235728_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235728_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:33.90 -13:48:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235743_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235743_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:44.51 -12:54:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 235860_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 235860_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:43.73 -14:28:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236026_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 236026_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:48.90 -15:59:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236069_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 236069_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:09.06 -14:30:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236170_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 236170_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:26.28 -14:27:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236252_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 236252_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236403_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 236403_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236417_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 236417_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236436_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 236436_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:48.04 -20:40:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236450_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 236450_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:45.64 -14:28:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236471_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 236471_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:10.74 -18:18:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236560_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 236560_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:30.18 -15:17:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236590_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 236590_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236648_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 236648_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236697_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 236697_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:24.85 -17:55:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236707_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 236707_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:20.81 -17:41:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236757_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 236757_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236848_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 236848_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:33.18 -15:58:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236914_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 236914_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236931_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 236931_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:07.89 -20:08:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237021_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 237021_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:30.48 -14:44:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237040_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 237040_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237093_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 237093_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:38.36 -20:59:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237130_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 237130_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:46.82 -17:40:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237133_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 237133_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237149_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 237149_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237155_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 237155_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:23.40 -14:58:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237260_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 237260_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (76.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237293_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 237293_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237339_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 237339_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:15.36 -13:03:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237387_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 237387_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237396_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 237396_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:13.38 -15:18:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237438_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 237438_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:13:41.99 -22:19:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237469_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 237469_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:42.74 -13:35:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237502_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 237502_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:54.02 -12:49:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237562_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 237562_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237596_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 237596_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:01.68 -15:02:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237639_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 237639_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237669_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 237669_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:24.11 -15:33:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237802_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 237802_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:28.16 -15:32:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237915_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 237915_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238311_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 238311_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128005_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 128005_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185564_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 185564_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165257_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 165257_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220148_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 220148_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221199_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 221199_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:24:21.77 -13:06:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158875_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 158875_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206274_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 206274_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159810_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 159810_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114249_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 114249_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166341_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 166341_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170852_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 170852_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162061_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 162061_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60485_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 60485_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 224855_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 224855_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:23.31 -15:04:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117457_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 117457_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223534_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 223534_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:30:22.15 -21:20:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194883_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 194883_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223066_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 223066_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:26.88 -20:35:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207530_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 207530_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156221_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 156221_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221718_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 221718_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220986_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 220986_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220959_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 220959_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220837_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 220837_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220612_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 220612_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 220576_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 220576_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71150_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 71150_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:50.07 -16:36:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41003_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 41003_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118146_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 118146_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71393_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 71393_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168028_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 168028_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 156055_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 156055_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195738_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 195738_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133551_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 133551_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192917_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 192917_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46982_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 46982_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:22:28.76 -15:06:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98375_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 98375_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:22:02.77 -17:41:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131214_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 131214_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:13:19.11 -19:20:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41370_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 41370_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:01:39.24 -15:00:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170061_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 170061_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105128_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 105128_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150639_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 150639_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:43.99 -20:30:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110487_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 110487_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197734_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 197734_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:39.44 -20:58:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130479_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 130479_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:02.28 -19:32:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123832_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 123832_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142758_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 142758_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:13:11.27 -19:56:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189539_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 189539_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12913_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 12913_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:25.53 -13:32:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13104_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 13104_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:40.77 -13:33:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164056_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 164056_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:02.08 -22:37:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190884_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 190884_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:32.75 -21:11:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63244_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 63244_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32495_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 32495_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88604_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 88604_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:17:02.71 -17:12:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103379_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 103379_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152732_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 152732_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:12:03.42 -20:21:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124346_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 124346_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:21.44 -19:05:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68868_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 68868_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121971_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 121971_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:50.08 -18:58:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117688_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 117688_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205999_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 205999_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176556_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 176556_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:26:31.38 -21:38:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94759_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
Preparing report for the candidate 94759_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173593_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 173593_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:59.17 -21:56:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 204046_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360
The candidate 204046_fd_Pup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_02-00-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0360 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (97.6") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 2s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 70s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Pup-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
08:22:02.73 -22:25:55.5
07:55:19.83 -18:11:18.3
07:54:42.35 -18:17:51.2
07:50:35.32 -18:31:24.3
08:19:56.13 -18:29:53.7
07:53:09.47 -18:52:53.3
08:02:03.19 -18:46:59.4
07:38:05.10 -18:55:58.9
08:02:13.12 -19:08:58.7
08:26:14.96 -19:03:47.0
08:05:59.13 -22:43:28.7
08:04:39.29 -22:19:25.7
08:00:48.44 -22:12:05.4
07:55:32.87 -21:32:00.4
07:51:48.24 -21:20:39.9
08:08:08.39 -21:03:45.8
08:06:50.41 -20:59:28.1
07:47:01.18 -21:40:54.9
08:18:02.19 -14:23:35.6
07:57:41.74 -15:00:04.9
08:12:04.55 -15:54:12.0
08:19:15.41 -15:58:31.8
08:17:53.46 -16:12:42.6
08:02:01.19 -17:43:43.2
########### Completed Pup-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
08:22:02.73 -22:25:55.5
07:47:01.18 -21:40:54.9
08:26:14.96 -19:03:47.0
07:55:32.87 -21:32:00.4
08:05:59.13 -22:43:28.7
08:19:56.13 -18:29:53.7
08:00:48.44 -22:12:05.4
08:12:04.55 -15:54:12.0
07:53:09.47 -18:52:53.3
07:57:41.74 -15:00:04.9
07:38:05.10 -18:55:58.9
08:04:39.29 -22:19:25.7
08:06:50.41 -20:59:28.1
08:08:08.39 -21:03:45.8
07:54:42.35 -18:17:51.2
07:50:35.32 -18:31:24.3
08:02:13.12 -19:08:58.7
07:51:48.24 -21:20:39.9
08:19:15.41 -15:58:31.8
08:18:02.19 -14:23:35.6
07:55:19.83 -18:11:18.3
08:17:53.46 -16:12:42.6
08:02:03.19 -18:46:59.4
08:02:01.19 -17:43:43.2
###################################################################################
08:22:02.73 -22:25:55.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
07:47:01.18 -21:40:54.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:26:14.96 -19:03:47.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
07:55:32.87 -21:32:00.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:05:59.13 -22:43:28.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:19:56.13 -18:29:53.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:00:48.44 -22:12:05.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:12:04.55 -15:54:12.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
07:53:09.47 -18:52:53.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
07:57:41.74 -15:00:04.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
07:38:05.10 -18:55:58.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:04:39.29 -22:19:25.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:06:50.41 -20:59:28.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:08:08.39 -21:03:45.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
07:54:42.35 -18:17:51.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
07:50:35.32 -18:31:24.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:02:13.12 -19:08:58.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
07:51:48.24 -21:20:39.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:19:15.41 -15:58:31.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:18:02.19 -14:23:35.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
07:55:19.83 -18:11:18.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:17:53.46 -16:12:42.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:02:03.19 -18:46:59.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
08:02:01.19 -17:43:43.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
07:38:05.10 -18:55:58.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
07:47:01.18 -21:40:54.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
07:50:35.32 -18:31:24.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
07:51:48.24 -21:20:39.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
07:53:09.47 -18:52:53.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
07:54:42.35 -18:17:51.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
07:55:19.83 -18:11:18.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
07:55:32.87 -21:32:00.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
07:57:41.74 -15:00:04.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:00:48.44 -22:12:05.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:02:01.19 -17:43:43.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:02:03.19 -18:46:59.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:02:13.12 -19:08:58.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:04:39.29 -22:19:25.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:05:59.13 -22:43:28.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:06:50.41 -20:59:28.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:08:08.39 -21:03:45.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:12:04.55 -15:54:12.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:17:53.46 -16:12:42.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:18:02.19 -14:23:35.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:19:15.41 -15:58:31.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:19:56.13 -18:29:53.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:22:02.73 -22:25:55.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
08:26:14.96 -19:03:47.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
07:38:05.10 -18:55:58.9 -- a known variable star
07:47:01.18 -21:40:54.9 -- a known variable star
07:50:35.32 -18:31:24.3 -- a known variable star
07:51:48.24 -21:20:39.9 -- a known variable star
07:53:09.47 -18:52:53.3 -- a known variable star
07:54:42.35 -18:17:51.2 -- a known variable star
07:55:19.83 -18:11:18.3 -- a known variable star
07:55:32.87 -21:32:00.4 -- a known variable star
07:57:41.74 -15:00:04.9 -- a known variable star
08:00:48.44 -22:12:05.4 -- a known variable star
08:02:01.19 -17:43:43.2 -- a known variable star
08:02:03.19 -18:46:59.4 -- a known variable star
08:02:13.12 -19:08:58.7 -- a known variable star
08:04:39.29 -22:19:25.7 -- a known variable star
08:05:59.13 -22:43:28.7 -- a known variable star
08:06:50.41 -20:59:28.1 -- a known variable star
08:08:08.39 -21:03:45.8 -- a known variable star
08:12:04.55 -15:54:12.0 -- a known variable star
08:17:53.46 -16:12:42.6 -- a known variable star
08:18:02.19 -14:23:35.6 -- a known variable star
08:19:15.41 -15:58:31.8 -- a known variable star
08:19:56.13 -18:29:53.7 -- a known variable star
08:22:02.73 -22:25:55.5 -- a known variable star
08:26:14.96 -19:03:47.0 -- a known variable star
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
24 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
07:38:05.10 -18:55:58.9
07:47:01.18 -21:40:54.9
07:50:35.32 -18:31:24.3
07:51:48.24 -21:20:39.9
07:53:09.47 -18:52:53.3
07:54:42.35 -18:17:51.2
07:55:19.83 -18:11:18.3
07:55:32.87 -21:32:00.4
07:57:41.74 -15:00:04.9
08:00:48.44 -22:12:05.4
08:02:01.19 -17:43:43.2
08:02:03.19 -18:46:59.4
08:02:13.12 -19:08:58.7
08:04:39.29 -22:19:25.7
08:05:59.13 -22:43:28.7
08:06:50.41 -20:59:28.1
08:08:08.39 -21:03:45.8
08:12:04.55 -15:54:12.0
08:17:53.46 -16:12:42.6
08:18:02.19 -14:23:35.6
08:19:15.41 -15:58:31.8
08:19:56.13 -18:29:53.7
08:22:02.73 -22:25:55.5
08:26:14.96 -19:03:47.0
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461347.83287568 -observatory V36
14:42:59.98 -16:38:45.8 Mercury (5.3mag)
13:25:25.94 -13:35:47.4 Venus (-4.3mag)
09:29:28.44 +16:33:46.1 Mars (0.8mag)
09:47:04.33 +14:06:13.9 Jupiter (-2.0mag)
00:36:25.71 +01:00:39.9 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:09:02.30 +20:50:09.0 Uranus (5.6mag)
00:08:20.20 -00:38:15.7 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:24:28.27 -23:41:33.1 Pluto (14.5mag)
10:08:51.62 +10:56:42.5 Moon (-9.9mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Nov 3 02:05 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461347.83287568:
09:46:59.01 +14:06:45.3 Io (6.0mag)
09:46:56.98 +14:06:58.0 Europa (6.1mag)
09:47:18.03 +14:04:55.4 Ganymede (5.5mag)
09:47:33.63 +14:03:27.0 Callisto (6.8mag)
09:48:31.15 +14:15:46.0 Himalia (15.5mag)
09:47:01.06 +14:06:32.6 Thebe (16.3mag)
09:46:50.15 +14:31:14.5 Elara (17.4mag)
09:47:50.12 +13:33:52.9 Pasiphae (17.7mag)
09:44:06.12 +14:38:08.1 Carme (18.7mag)
00:36:34.41 +01:00:11.3 Titan (8.3mag)
00:36:26.75 +01:00:40.3 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:36:55.95 +01:01:18.0 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:36:14.29 +01:00:20.5 Hyperion (14.2mag)
00:34:38.97 +00:48:30.2 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Nov 3 02:05 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461347.83287568:
04:35:30.02 +17:22:36.1 JWST
14:28:58.40 +53:49:41.8 Chandra
06:58:44.77 -04:15:18.8 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Nov 3 02:05 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461347.83287568 -observatory V36
03:33:42.58 +19:56:56.6 17.1mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
07:46:36.70 +38:22:44.5 17.9mag P/2004 V5 (LINEAR-Hill)
07:46:42.06 +38:22:31.5 17.9mag P/2004 V5-A (LINEAR-Hill)
07:46:00.62 +38:22:51.2 17.9mag P/2004 V5-B (LINEAR-Hill)
05:01:55.86 +39:07:26.8 17.8mag P/2009 Y2 (Kowalski)
18:47:59.36 -32:52:47.1 15.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:45:17.88 -73:54:04.3 17.2mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:11:30.20 +35:18:23.6 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
07:35:42.40 +25:20:22.1 16.9mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:08:34.06 +38:31:10.7 16.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
18:36:57.42 +40:52:20.8 17.4mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
05:43:05.21 -13:33:24.0 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
14:15:11.30 -04:34:53.6 16.3mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
20:14:28.12 +53:08:16.7 15.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
13:07:31.01 +16:58:30.0 17.7mag A/2026 E1
16:00:47.84 -65:22:30.1 14.5mag P/2026 R2 (Leonard)
19:33:59.39 -05:22:05.8 17.1mag P/2026 T1 (ATLAS)
23:29:05.17 +14:04:46.3 16.8mag 2P/Encke
23:25:57.67 -25:47:57.0 15.4mag 10P/Tempel
02:39:51.37 +30:36:50.3 16.3mag 11P/Tempel-Swift-LINEAR
12:26:06.69 -10:01:46.9 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
00:10:42.47 -09:01:27.4 15.9mag 65P/Gunn
08:00:08.73 +13:35:40.2 14.0mag 78P/Gehrels
08:59:32.59 +45:55:59.9 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
09:50:59.85 +05:37:31.5 17.8mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
12:26:44.13 +08:03:49.5 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
19:49:07.57 +14:23:31.4 10.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
11:12:00.52 -03:05:35.9 16.2mag 169P/NEAT
09:41:32.66 +23:30:04.7 18.0mag 186P/Garradd
03:10:46.54 +02:11:38.1 15.3mag 220P/McNaught
06:22:38.80 +49:45:22.3 15.6mag 260P/McNaught
07:56:24.25 +25:04:38.3 17.6mag 266P/Christensen
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 1.6K Nov 3 02:05 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
17:54:18.84 -27:36:35.70 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-24.76 9.92
10:38:47.97 +53:30:34.00 SN2026sqf 2026-10-24.6 13.27
21:49:53.30 +14:07:44.90 ASASSN-26fq 2026-10-23.23 14.82
01:00:14.36 +34:04:05.90 ASASSN-26fp 2026-10-23.34 12.9
01:06:23.14 -63:46:37.10 ASASSN-26fo 2026-10-19.79 -4.88
00:25:28.03 +20:14:39.10 SN2026afqd 2026-10-19.36 -0.77
22:14:03.37 -45:07:18.60 ASASSN-26fm 2026-10-13.75 14.42
01:57:48.19 -33:14:42.30 SN 2026aedl 2026-10-12.33 15.3
18:05:22.06 +17:52:41.00 ASASSN-26fn 2026-10-11.74 15.23
21:50:55.86 -02:51:49.30 SN2026acyb 2026-10-9.85 16.83
03:40:34.04 +02:31:56.70 SN2026acvp 2026-10-9.95 17.75
04:33:25.91 -13:41:04.20 SN2026adhl 2026-10-9.94 17.52
09:20:05.05 +27:03:12.40 SN2026aeif 2026-10-9.47 15.93
02:58:07.77 -65:18:52.90 ASASSN-26fl 2026-10-7.9 -0.85
02:49:03.98 -49:55:57.00 SN 2026adfy 2026-10-4.88 16.61
22:03:46.31 -11:07:57.70 AT2026adgn 2026-10-4.28 -2.56
15:03:12.98 +49:51:05.40 ASASSN-26fj 2026-10-2.06 15.91
08:07:27.96 -65:51:03.90 ASASSN-26fi 2026-10-1.36 15.82
21:02:34.66 +23:57:26.20 ASASSN-26fh 2026-10-1.27 15.94
20:00:16.62 +03:26:29.90 AT2026adfv 2026-10-1.3 16.42
00:08:42.74 -32:33:16.50 SN2026abhc 2026-09-29.15 15.57
21:02:30.26 -19:27:41.80 SN2026acxa 2026-09-29.13 14.65
04:39:17.45 -28:06:12.40 ASASSN-26fg 2026-09-23.25 15.73
05:25:07.80 +04:38:32.40 SN2026aajs 2026-09-21.32 17.04
19:56:12.67 +08:25:27.70 AT2026acgs 2026-09-18.14 15.84
00:02:34.06 +52:55:18.90 ASASSN-26ff 2026-09-16.38 15.41
23:44:33.18 +17:46:12.20 SN2026yjv 2026-09-15.38 18.32
16:21:12.24 +57:37:51.30 SN 2026aafh 2026-09-14.11 15.02
23:36:00.27 -19:28:18.00 SN 2026aaks 2026-09-14.44 16.89
16:35:24.86 -05:32:38.20 SN2026aasi 2026-09-12.99 16.58
16:46:08.71 +37:25:21.80 SN2026aafk 2026-09-13.25 17.4
23:48:37.86 +50:25:24.60 SN2026aafs 2026-09-13.47 17
21:20:27.02 +02:10:42.50 SN2026aagh -------
08:02:26.85 -24:37:44.10 ASASSN-26fe 2026-09-13.34 13.67
02:29:34.91 +23:06:56.30 SN2026aars 2026-09-12.27 16.93
02:47:25.52 -32:58:34.50 SN 2026znh 2026-09-9.92 16.26
04:59:14.53 -83:27:58.80 ASASSN-26fd 2026-09-9.11 17.27
17:52:06.79 -23:43:20.70 ASASSN-26fc 2026-09-8.79 12.14
03:52:53.26 -14:19:28.70 SN 2026zfw 2026-09-8 17.78
01:53:26.46 +10:07:25.10 SN2026aacj 2026-09-7.17 16.27
20:04:34.47 +62:38:38.10 SN2026zji 2026-09-7.14 15.87
22:37:05.64 +34:24:35.00 SN2026aaiv 2026-09-7.25 13.48
22:24:21.29 -10:25:31.60 ASASSN-26fb 2026-09-5.3 13.93
00:44:54.28 +41:33:10.50 AT2026aabo 2026-09-3.29 15.02
00:52:12.40 -58:22:08.60 SN 2026zhl 2026-08-31.92 16.51
19:53:57.87 +61:00:19.70 ASASSN-26fa 2026-08-31.18 14.63
00:21:50.96 -09:29:16.30 AT2026zwp 2026-08-31.41 15.59
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.79 -22:25:29.10 V8055 2026-08-30 10.76
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.89 -10:37:05.90 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.05 15.79
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Nov 3 02:05 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
00:42:50.38 +41:18:58.76 PNV J00425038+4118587 2026-09-04.1512 18.2mag
00:42:12.76 +41:16:28.4 PNV J00421276+4116284 2026-09-10.9176 18.67Cmag
17:52:06.80 -23:43:20.7 TCP J17520680-2343207 2026-09-08.7896 12.6mag
00:42:40.94 +41:15:37.1 PNV J00424094+4115371 2026-09-17.8925 18.3mag
08:49:20.13 -09:19:15.8 TCP J08492013-0919158 2026-09-18.4698 13.3mag
00:42:13.93 +41:16:35.6 PNV J00421393+4116356 2026-09-22.6597 19.66Cmag
18:14:01.58 +15:13:55.5 TCP J18140158+1513555 2026-09-24.4645 14.1mag
00:42:36.61 +41:13:50.5 TCP J00423661+4113505 2026-09-29.7462 17.4mag
22:03:46.29 -11:07:57.8 TCP J22034629-1107578 2026-09-29.7438 14.51Cmag
22:05:02.06 +20:49:01.2 TCP J22050206+2049012 2026-10-03.5715 17.13Cmag
00:38:15.01 +41:14:47.2 TCP J00381501+4114472 2026-10-08.5978 17.72Cmag
01:06:05.83 +09:51:20.4 TCP J01060583+0951204 2026-10-10.8543 14.54Cmag
17:54:18.76 -27:36:36.2 TCP J17541876-2736362 2026-10-12.3993 10.8mag
09:56:00.79 +69:06:15.2 PNV J09560079+6906152 2026-10-14.9274 19.38Cmag
00:43:30.83 +41:26:55.3 PNV J00433083+4126553 2026-10-17.5651 18.61Cmag
04:57:32.08 +30:15:41.6 TCP J04573208+3015416 2026-10-17.7818 18.21Cmag
05:21:07.64 +23:38:21.3 TCP J05210764+2338213 2026-10-18.4020 10.3mag
05:34:11.01 +28:45:30.5 TCP J05341101+2845305 2026-10-18.3604 16.6mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 191K Nov 3 02:05 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
04:49:00.563 -20:22:30.78 AT 2026afqw 2026-10-16.48 19.4415
07:26:25.375 -34:28:52.68 AT 2026afqv 2026-10-17.34 19.271
21:46:13.715 +36:36:26.80 AT 2026afqu 2026-10-15.87 19.7
03:11:38.085 -02:01:36.09 AT 2026afqt 2026-10-16.06 19.51
07:41:25.037 +21:02:16.50 SN 2026afqs 2026-10-13.18 19.73
08:37:58.823 +12:32:25.90 SN 2026afqr 2026-10-17.23 19.93
04:51:17.403 -26:27:57.01 AT 2026afqq 2026-10-17.26 19.449
04:37:45.596 -24:04:12.02 AT 2026afqp 2026-10-17.26 19.535
01:25:03.389 -32:39:10.49 AT 2026afqo 2026-10-12.21 19.322
03:17:26.864 -15:58:34.85 AT 2026afqn 2026-10-17.30 19.375
17:53:52.220 +41:47:24.16 AT 2026afqm 2026-10-16.83 19.331
06:23:17.419 +70:33:15.10 SN 2026afql 2026-10-17.15 18.737
02:38:36.934 +41:55:58.84 SN 2026afqk 2026-10-17.04 19.369
05:26:14.588 -27:06:01.24 AT 2026afqj 2026-10-17.29 19.31
02:01:09.758 -36:18:14.69 AT 2026afqi 2026-10-12.26 19.361
09:44:49.328 +38:11:23.47 SN 2026afqh 2026-10-17.22 18.467
17:38:02.102 +55:52:14.30 AT 2026afqg 2026-10-16.84 19.253
02:35:38.526 -36:21:14.39 AT 2026afqf 2026-10-17.25 19.522
00:43:30.828 +41:26:55.48 AT 2026afqe 2026-10-17.57 18.61
00:25:27.859 +20:14:37.33 SN 2026afqd 2026-10-17.09 19.18
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 89K Nov 3 02:05 tns_transients_list.txt
