This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3189 2461347.8189 11.78 03:08:27.37 +14:39:19.1
165.64802 -36.60656 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.72 Feronia -0 -0 0 11.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:08:27.37 +14:39:19.1: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:08:27.37 +14:39:19.1: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3189* 03 08 27.37 +14 39 19.1 11.8 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8189,11.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3189 11.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3189 2461347.8189 12.26 03:58:22.35 +17:05:18.0
174.10054 -26.68413 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.62 Erato 0 0 0 12.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:22.35 +17:05:18.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:22.35 +17:05:18.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3189* 03 58 22.35 +17 05 18.0 12.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8189,12.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3189 12.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3189 2461347.8189 14.52 03:18:52.11 +14:26:27.7
168.20997 -35.16204 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1336 Zeelandia -1 0 1 14.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:18:52.11 +14:26:27.7: 16.10 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:18:52.11 +14:26:27.7: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.10 +/- 0.33
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3189* 03 18 52.11 +14 26 27.7 14.5 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8189,14.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3189 14.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3189 2461347.8189 13.02 03:42:39.56 +13:30:36.3
174.02796 -31.89478 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.443 Photographica 0 -0 0 13.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:42:39.56 +13:30:36.3: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:42:39.56 +13:30:36.3: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3189* 03 42 39.56 +13 30 36.3 13.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8189,13.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3189 13.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3189 2461347.8189 13.38 03:30:20.22 +16:41:08.3
168.91792 -31.65254 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.131 Vala -1 0 1 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:30:20.22 +16:41:08.3: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:30:20.22 +16:41:08.3: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3189* 03 30 20.22 +16 41 08.3 13.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8189,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3189 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3189 2461347.8189 13.49 03:08:31.36 +17:42:13.0
163.36369 -34.19271 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.586 Thekla -2 0 2 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:08:31.36 +17:42:13.0: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:08:31.36 +17:42:13.0: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3189* 03 08 31.36 +17 42 13.0 13.5 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8189,13.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3189 13.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3189 2461347.8189 13.54 03:42:38.59 +15:46:53.4
172.15124 -30.28948 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.742 Edisona 0 -0 0 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:42:38.59 +15:46:53.4: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:42:38.59 +15:46:53.4: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3189* 03 42 38.59 +15 46 53.4 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8189,13.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3189 13.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3189 2461347.8189 13.74 04:01:32.27 +13:28:24.6
177.68817 -28.56781 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1115 Sabauda 1 0 1 14.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 04:01:32.27 +13:28:24.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 04:01:32.27 +13:28:24.6: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3189* 04 01 32.27 +13 28 24.6 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8189,13.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3189 13.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3189 2461347.8189 14.11 03:45:30.51 +09:43:46.2
177.86971 -33.98965 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.655 Briseis 0 -1 1 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:45:30.51 +09:43:46.2: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:45:30.51 +09:43:46.2: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3189* 03 45 30.51 +09 43 46.2 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8189,14.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3189 14.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3189 2461347.8189 14.21 03:43:26.87 +09:38:30.2
177.53329 -34.42345 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1055 Tynka 0 0 0 14.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:43:26.87 +09:38:30.2: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:43:26.87 +09:38:30.2: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3189* 03 43 26.87 +09 38 30.2 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8189,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3189 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3189 2461347.8189 14.45 03:18:50.51 +18:21:30.3
165.18355 -32.16127 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.310 Margarita 0 0 0 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:18:50.51 +18:21:30.3: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:18:50.51 +18:21:30.3: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3189* 03 18 50.51 +18 21 30.3 14.4 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8189,14.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3189 14.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3189 2461347.8189 14.53 03:05:40.03 +18:59:45.7
161.77849 -33.56228 galactic Ari Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1879 Broederstroom -1 -0 1 14.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:05:40.03 +18:59:45.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:05:40.03 +18:59:45.7: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3189* 03 05 40.03 +18 59 45.7 14.5 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8189,14.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3189 14.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3189 2461347.8189 14.96 03:58:29.51 +17:40:44.6
173.64461 -26.25612 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 5.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.858 El Djezair 1 1 1 15.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:29.51 +17:40:44.6: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:29.51 +17:40:44.6: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3189* 03 58 29.51 +17 40 44.6 15.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8189,14.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3189 14.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3189 2461347.8189 14.82 03:39:41.12 +14:46:08.0
172.38329 -31.51201 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1350 Rosselia 0 -0 0 14.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:39:41.12 +14:46:08.0: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:39:41.12 +14:46:08.0: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3189* 03 39 41.12 +14 46 08.0 14.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461347.8189,14.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20261103.3189 14.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 11 03.3189 2461347.8189 15.12 03:25:13.95 +18:42:49.5
166.28652 -30.92140 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 5.1 pix
The object was found in VSX13" CSS_J032513.8+184238
Type: EW
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.360 CV Y 0.230 CV 0.263536000000 G7
The object was found in astcheck.1202 Marina -0 -0 0 15.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:25:13.95 +18:42:49.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:25:13.95 +18:42:49.5: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 11 03.3189* 03 25 13.95 +18 42 49.5 15.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
CSS_J032513.8+184238,2461347.8189,15.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
CSS_J032513.8+184238 20261103.3189 15.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
First image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Last image: 2461347.81916608 03.11.2026 07:39:25.949 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7879
Objects passed selection criteria: 7873
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7520.5
Average stars matched: 7318 (97.3074 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233788 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 01:44:21 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
First image: 2461049.67169814 09.01.2026 04:07:04.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Last image: 2461347.81916608 03.11.2026 07:39:25.949 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 80
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.01
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 48043
Objects passed selection criteria: 47932
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 45926.2
Average stars matched: 44120 (96.0671 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 267476 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Oct 15 15:05:03 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-241-g3eca6a38
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.25.2 (2026-10-15)
GNU bash, version 5.3.20(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Nov 3 01:46:22 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461347.81861588
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:09.490 +13:59:10.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:09.490 +13:59:10.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0457 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:09.524 +13:59:43.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:09.524 +13:59:43.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0440 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:33:09.490 +13:59:10.33
Second-epoch second image center 03:33:09.524 +13:59:43.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00914 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J9rybgJIaR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HW601KlvVT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bgolfockry
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rfXcAA4VqT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec +8.6205 to +19.2872 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec 8.6205 to 19.2872 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3742 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3742 out of 7716 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.950750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.950750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec +8.6205 to +19.2872 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6428 deg, Dec 8.6205 to 19.2872 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3742 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3742 out of 7716 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0650 to 61.6427 deg, Dec +8.6182 to +19.2791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0650 to 61.6427 deg, Dec 8.6182 to 19.2791 deg
Loaded 4354 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3534 out of 3736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3736 out of 7722 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
2.0 pix Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.J9rybgJIaR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=551, bad_region=0, passed=7716
Got 7716 stars (including 7157 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7716 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=1380 n_q2=1359 n_q3=1203 n_q4=953 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.327
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4895 N_valid=4895 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.000 bias_dec_arcsec=0.002 median_sep_arcsec=0.250 p95_sep_arcsec=0.766 n_q1=1380 n_q2=1359 n_q3=1203 n_q4=953 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HW601KlvVT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=536, bad_region=0, passed=7722
Got 7722 stars (including 7177 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7722 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7722 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=1378 n_q2=1355 n_q3=1207 n_q4=960 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.311
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4900 N_valid=4900 bias_ra_arcsec=0.004 bias_dec_arcsec=0.008 median_sep_arcsec=0.253 p95_sep_arcsec=0.779 n_q1=1378 n_q2=1355 n_q3=1207 n_q4=960 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bgolfockry (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=526, bad_region=0, passed=7404
Got 7404 stars (including 6877 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7404 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 548 (Dec 8.3 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5380)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=13.617 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.103 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.103 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.525 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.641 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.641 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.312 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.334 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.304 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4892 robust_rms_before=1.121 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.322 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.312 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.344 worst_region_rms_after=0.334 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.209 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.304
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.344 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.344 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.322 arcsec matched=4892
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=1422 n_q2=1337 n_q3=1200 n_q4=933 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4892 N_valid=4892 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.544 bias_dec_arcsec=0.605 median_sep_arcsec=1.036 p95_sep_arcsec=2.019 n_q1=1422 n_q2=1337 n_q3=1200 n_q4=933 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.rfXcAA4VqT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=526, bad_region=0, passed=7423
Got 7423 stars (including 6892 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7423 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 549 (Dec 8.4 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7423 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 549 (Dec 8.4 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7423 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7423 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5381)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=13.496 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.828 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.828 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.516 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.636 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.636 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.306 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.313 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.299 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4892 robust_rms_before=1.081 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.308 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.306 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.327 worst_region_rms_after=0.313 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.192 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.299
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.327 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.327 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.308 arcsec matched=4892
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1410 n_q2=1340 n_q3=1202 n_q4=940 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4892 N_valid=4892 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.507 bias_dec_arcsec=0.605 median_sep_arcsec=0.981 p95_sep_arcsec=1.933 n_q1=1410 n_q2=1340 n_q3=1202 n_q4=940 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits sigma_overall=0.305 worst_q_ratio=1.327
ref2=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits sigma_overall=0.307 worst_q_ratio=1.311
new1=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits sigma_overall=0.332 worst_q_ratio=1.097
new2=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits sigma_overall=0.324 worst_q_ratio=1.088
reference average sigma_overall=0.306 worst_q_ratio=1.319
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138_astrometric_residuals.png (4900 matched stars from wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349_astrometric_residuals.png (4892 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350_astrometric_residuals.png (4892 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:34:00.88 +16:04:03.4: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:50:08.47 +10:21:28.2: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:22.35 +17:05:18.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:08:27.37 +14:39:19.1: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:43:26.69 +12:49:58.0: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:43:26.69 +12:49:58.0: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:50:08.47 +10:21:28.2: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:08:27.37 +14:39:19.1: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:34:00.88 +16:04:03.4: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:22.35 +17:05:18.0: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:26.69 +12:49:58.0: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3802 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:50:08.47 +10:21:28.2: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3849 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:00.88 +16:04:03.4: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4245 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20481.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20520.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 55s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20481_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
Preparing report for the candidate 20481_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20520_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
Preparing report for the candidate 20520_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20527_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 20527_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20532_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 20532_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20536_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 20536_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05772_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 05772_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:28.63 +11:24:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 58s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
03:08:27.37 +14:39:19.1
03:58:22.35 +17:05:18.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:09.490 +13:59:10.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:09.490 +13:59:10.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0457 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:33:09.524 +13:59:43.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:20.383 +13:59:53.59
Second-epoch image center 03:33:09.524 +13:59:43.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0440 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:33:09.490 +13:59:10.33
Second-epoch second image center 03:33:09.524 +13:59:43.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00914 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C1dFEMy8wM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BfIfsqhw9s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j4nnwDF443
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VsMOShnoja
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 48584 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec +8.6191 to +19.2871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec 8.6191 to 19.2871 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3760 out of 48584 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.830300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.830300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.01
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.82
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.82
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 48584 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec +8.6191 to +19.2871 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0636 to 61.6458 deg, Dec 8.6191 to 19.2871 deg
Loaded 4361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3309 out of 3760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3760 out of 48584 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 48560 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 45.0650 to 61.6548 deg, Dec +8.6183 to +19.2794 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 45.0650 to 61.6548 deg, Dec 8.6183 to 19.2794 deg
Loaded 4358 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3320 out of 3753 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3753 out of 48560 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 71 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
1.9 pix Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.8 mag. Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
15.8 mag. Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
15.6 mag. fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.6 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.C1dFEMy8wM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2222, bad_region=4, passed=48568
Got 48568 stars (including 46270 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48568 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.252 n_q1=1362 n_q2=1350 n_q3=1192 n_q4=994 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.312
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4898 N_valid=4898 bias_ra_arcsec=0.008 bias_dec_arcsec=-0.003 median_sep_arcsec=0.245 p95_sep_arcsec=0.750 n_q1=1362 n_q2=1350 n_q3=1192 n_q4=994 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.BfIfsqhw9s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=2192, bad_region=5, passed=48544
Got 48544 stars (including 46257 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48544 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.256 n_q1=1361 n_q2=1351 n_q3=1201 n_q4=986 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4899 N_valid=4899 bias_ra_arcsec=0.013 bias_dec_arcsec=0.007 median_sep_arcsec=0.245 p95_sep_arcsec=0.763 n_q1=1361 n_q2=1351 n_q3=1201 n_q4=986 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.j4nnwDF443 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=34, blended=2382, bad_region=47, passed=44179
Got 44179 stars (including 41662 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44179 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4870 stars left (next iteration limit 5357)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=13.739 arcsec worst_region_rms=24.798 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=24.798 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.520 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.630 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.630 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.301 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.326 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.307 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4870 robust_rms_before=1.120 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.311 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.301 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.343 worst_region_rms_after=0.326 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.181 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.307
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.343 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.343 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.311 arcsec matched=4870
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits N_match=4870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=1410 n_q2=1325 n_q3=1182 n_q4=953 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4870 N_valid=4870 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.566 bias_dec_arcsec=0.644 median_sep_arcsec=1.047 p95_sep_arcsec=1.990 n_q1=1410 n_q2=1325 n_q3=1182 n_q4=953 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.VsMOShnoja (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=2296, bad_region=47, passed=43925
Got 43925 stars (including 41501 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43925 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4871 stars left (next iteration limit 5358)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=13.642 arcsec worst_region_rms=25.274 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=25.274 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.511 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.648 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.648 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4871 robust_rms=0.295 arcsec worst_region_rms=0.301 arcsec outer_annulus_rms=0.299 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4871 robust_rms_before=1.082 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.296 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.295 arcsec worst_region_rms_before=0.312 worst_region_rms_after=0.301 outer_annulus_rms_before=1.180 outer_annulus_rms_after=0.299
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-region baseline 0.312 arcsec) - keeping the original
SIP_REFIT_REJECTED: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits worst_region_rms_kept=0.312 arcsec robust_rms_kept=0.296 arcsec matched=4871
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits N_match=4871 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=1415 n_q2=1331 n_q3=1184 n_q4=941 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
WCS_HEADER_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits selection=current_pairs N_selected=4871 N_valid=4871 bias_ra_arcsec=-0.531 bias_dec_arcsec=0.637 median_sep_arcsec=1.000 p95_sep_arcsec=1.881 n_q1=1415 n_q2=1331 n_q3=1184 n_q4=941 occupied_cells_4x4=16/16
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-38-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0349.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-11-03_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_014016_TTUQ1b1x1_2492590_WgCc1AUJ/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:46:20.78 +18:00:02.6: 15.35 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:23:38.63 +18:59:18.9: 14.91 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:46:55.33 +18:38:28.9: 14.71 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:34:29.86 +13:36:49.9: 14.70 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 04:03:36.60 +16:13:39.6: 15.09 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:10:58.33 +13:59:01.9: 14.82 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:09:18.89 +09:53:27.9: 14.85 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:33:04.20 +18:55:12.3: 14.73 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:19:08.04 +10:11:16.9: 15.10 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:05:00.63 +12:21:33.3: 14.53 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:23:38.63 +18:59:18.9: 14.76 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:33:04.20 +18:55:12.3: 14.84 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:46:20.78 +18:00:02.6: 15.23 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 04:03:36.60 +16:13:39.6: 15.13 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:46:55.33 +18:38:28.9: 14.80 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:34:29.86 +13:36:49.9: 14.62 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:09:18.89 +09:53:27.9: 14.58 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:10:58.33 +13:59:01.9: 15.00 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:38.63 +18:59:18.9: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.9361 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:33:04.20 +18:55:12.3: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7820 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:19:08.04 +10:11:16.9: 15.34 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:20.78 +18:00:02.6: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0384 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:36.60 +16:13:39.6: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0359 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:29.86 +13:36:49.9: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.8306 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:55.33 +18:38:28.9: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7604 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:18.89 +09:53:27.9: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7544 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:58.33 +13:59:01.9: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9192 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:19:08.04 +10:11:16.9: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0433 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:05:00.63 +12:21:33.3: 14.63 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:05:00.63 +12:21:33.3: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6095 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:07:26.58 +17:28:15.1: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:03:35.69 +13:39:59.3: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:03.15 +18:09:01.8: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:53:42.58 +10:36:10.6: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:18:52.11 +14:26:27.7: 16.10 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:42:22.32 +09:25:47.9: 14.80 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:13:20.84 +13:35:12.4: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:14:21.30 +10:20:53.6: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:07:26.58 +17:28:15.1: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:03:35.69 +13:39:59.3: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:03.15 +18:09:01.8: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:26.58 +17:28:15.1: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2069 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:03.15 +18:09:01.8: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8115 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:03:35.69 +13:39:59.3: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1157 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:18:52.11 +14:26:27.7: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.10 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:18:52.11 +14:26:27.7: ref_mag=16.10 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=14.5190 delta=1.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:53:42.58 +10:36:10.6: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:42:22.32 +09:25:47.9: 14.96 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:53:42.58 +10:36:10.6: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8358 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:22.32 +09:25:47.9: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6927 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:13:20.84 +13:35:12.4: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:20.84 +13:35:12.4: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7432 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:42:39.56 +13:30:36.3: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:14:21.30 +10:20:53.6: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:21.30 +10:20:53.6: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9372 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:30:20.22 +16:41:08.3: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:42:39.56 +13:30:36.3: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 04:01:32.27 +13:28:24.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:42:38.59 +15:46:53.4: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:08:31.36 +17:42:13.0: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:45:30.51 +09:43:46.2: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:43:26.87 +09:38:30.2: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:30:20.22 +16:41:08.3: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:23:30.52 +17:10:26.6: 14.38 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 04:01:32.27 +13:28:24.6: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:42:38.59 +15:46:53.4: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:08:31.36 +17:42:13.0: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:43:23.95 +18:09:04.7: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:45:30.51 +09:43:46.2: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:43:26.87 +09:38:30.2: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:23:30.52 +17:10:26.6: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:23:30.52 +17:10:26.6: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2381 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:43:23.95 +18:09:04.7: 14.57 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:23.95 +18:09:04.7: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4224 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:16.44 +17:05:14.3: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:18:50.51 +18:21:30.3: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:16.44 +17:05:14.3: 14.50 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:18:50.51 +18:21:30.3: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:16.44 +17:05:14.3: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3999 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:57:43.01 +18:43:34.9: 15.00 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:57:43.01 +18:43:34.9: 14.90 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:43.01 +18:43:34.9: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6893 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:26:01.84 +18:58:40.8: 14.69 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:26:01.84 +18:58:40.8: 14.87 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:01.84 +18:58:40.8: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6881 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:05:40.03 +18:59:45.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:05:40.03 +18:59:45.7: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:58:29.51 +17:40:44.6: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:58:29.51 +17:40:44.6: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:39:41.12 +14:46:08.0: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:14:38.14 +09:37:07.7: 15.25 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:39:41.12 +14:46:08.0: 16.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:56:16.21 +18:38:18.4: 15.21 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:09:57.52 +19:07:16.3: 14.94 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:21:11.43 +18:50:15.9: 15.21 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:14:38.14 +09:37:07.7: 15.30 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:14:38.14 +09:37:07.7: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8559 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:11:59.71 +10:50:07.4: 15.33 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:56:16.21 +18:38:18.4: 15.10 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:16.21 +18:38:18.4: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9441 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:09:57.52 +19:07:16.3: 15.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:57.52 +19:07:16.3: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8278 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:21:11.43 +18:50:15.9: 15.09 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:21:11.43 +18:50:15.9: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9360 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:25:13.95 +18:42:49.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:11:59.71 +10:50:07.4: 15.48 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:59.71 +10:50:07.4: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9702 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 04:02:25.59 +12:54:48.3: 15.44 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:25:13.95 +18:42:49.5: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:56:57.32 +17:18:07.2: 15.33 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:09:38.61 +09:44:40.1: 15.17 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 04:02:25.59 +12:54:48.3: 15.58 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:52:42.58 +18:09:42.6: 15.73 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:02:25.59 +12:54:48.3: ref_mag=15.50 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.0604 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:56:57.32 +17:18:07.2: 15.82 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:57.32 +17:18:07.2: ref_mag=15.47 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.1287 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:15:32.03 +18:46:51.3: 15.09 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:09:38.61 +09:44:40.1: 15.49 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:38.61 +09:44:40.1: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9286 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:52:42.58 +18:09:42.6: 15.57 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.64 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:42.58 +18:09:42.6: ref_mag=15.64 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=15.1561 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:54:51.51 +18:21:09.4: 15.43 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:15:32.03 +18:46:51.3: 15.48 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:15:32.03 +18:46:51.3: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0739 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:09:21.20 +11:28:09.0: 15.16 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:27:43.63 +16:56:31.9: 15.36 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:13:15.95 +18:18:33.3: 15.20 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:54:51.51 +18:21:09.4: 15.09 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:51.51 +18:21:09.4: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1286 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:07:14.02 +18:33:30.4: 15.64 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:09:21.20 +11:28:09.0: 15.33 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:09:21.20 +11:28:09.0: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9749 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:03:10.60 +16:11:56.6: 15.21 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:13:15.95 +18:18:33.3: 15.02 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:15:16.91 +12:03:55.8: 15.32 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:27:43.63 +16:56:31.9: 15.48 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:15.95 +18:18:33.3: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.1070 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.41 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:27:43.63 +16:56:31.9: ref_mag=15.41 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1653 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:07:14.02 +18:33:30.4: 15.34 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.45 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:07:14.02 +18:33:30.4: ref_mag=15.45 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.1083 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:03:10.60 +16:11:56.6: 15.53 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:03:10.60 +16:11:56.6: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=15.1737 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:15:16.91 +12:03:55.8: 15.47 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:16:01.65 +09:14:50.0: 15.25 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:15:16.91 +12:03:55.8: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1640 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:10:39.16 +11:40:45.3: 15.50 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:18:20.05 +09:03:19.6: 15.71 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-07-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits at 03:02:28.79 +11:17:19.7: 15.22 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:16:01.65 +09:14:50.0: 15.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:16:01.65 +09:14:50.0: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.0679 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:10:39.16 +11:40:45.3: 15.38 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.44 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:10:39.16 +11:40:45.3: ref_mag=15.44 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0412 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:02:28.79 +11:17:19.7: 15.43 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-08-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits at 03:18:20.05 +09:03:19.6: 15.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:02:28.79 +11:17:19.7: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9914 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:18:20.05 +09:03:19.6: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.1960 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53582.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53908.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54042.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54088.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54117.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54218.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54433.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54474.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54591.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54724.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54840.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54868.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54960.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 110s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 11s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53534_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53534_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53543_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53543_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53544_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53544_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53546_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53546_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53550_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53550_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53551_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53551_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53552_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53552_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53558_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53558_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53561_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53561_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53563_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53563_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53568_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53568_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53569_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53569_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53582_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
Preparing report for the candidate 53582_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53587_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53587_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53589_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53589_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53601_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53601_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53602_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53602_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:38.01 +17:28:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53603_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53603_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53604_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53604_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53605_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53605_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:01.84 +18:05:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53607_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53607_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:37.24 +18:20:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53610_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53610_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53710_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53710_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:08:27.37 +14:39:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53757_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 53757_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:58:22.36 +17:05:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53908_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
Preparing report for the candidate 53908_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54042_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
Preparing report for the candidate 54042_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54088_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
Preparing report for the candidate 54088_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54117_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
Preparing report for the candidate 54117_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54218_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
Preparing report for the candidate 54218_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54341_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 54341_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:07:55.02 +16:03:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54433_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
Preparing report for the candidate 54433_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54474_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
Preparing report for the candidate 54474_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54553_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 54553_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54577_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 54577_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54581_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 54581_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54591_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
Preparing report for the candidate 54591_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54682_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 54682_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54692_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 54692_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54724_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
Preparing report for the candidate 54724_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54840_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
Preparing report for the candidate 54840_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54868_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
Preparing report for the candidate 54868_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54883_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 54883_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54895_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 54895_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54913_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 54913_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54914_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 54914_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54941_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 54941_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:28.95 +17:18:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54944_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 54944_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54960_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
Preparing report for the candidate 54960_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54973_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 54973_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54992_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 54992_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54999_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 54999_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55002_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 55002_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55015_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 55015_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55041_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 55041_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55042_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 55042_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55063_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 55063_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55088_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 55088_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55111_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 55111_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55116_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 55116_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55125_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 55125_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55126_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 55126_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55129_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 55129_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55143_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 55143_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55156_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 55156_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55183_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 55183_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42495_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 42495_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:28.63 +11:24:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13392_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 13392_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07244_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 07244_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46633_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 46633_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02331_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 02331_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46398_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350
The candidate 46398_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-11-03_01-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0350 did not pass the final checks
